Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Fondo
● La clavícula es un hueso de doble curva en forma de S que actúa como un puntal
para la escápula con el !n de suspender la extremidad superior lejos del tórax y
permitir un amplio rango de movimiento.
● La clavícula es el hueso más comúnmente fracturado en el cuerpo, con > 90 % en la
ubicación del eje medio en los adolescentes.
● Las fracturas de la clavícula se pueden clasi!car en función de la ubicación anatómi-
ca.
⚬ Grupo I: fractura del tercio medio de la clavícula
⚬ Grupo II: fractura del tercio lateral (distal) de la clavícula
⚬ Grupo III: fractura del tercio medial (proximal) de la clavícula
● Las fracturas ocurren con mayor frecuencia después de caer sobre el hombro.
Otras causas incluyen un trauma directo en la clavícula, una caída sobre una mano
extendida y un trauma de nacimiento.
● La curación de las fracturas de la clavícula comienza inmediatamente después de
una lesión por 2 vías potenciales: curación ósea indirecta (más común) o curación
ósea directa.
● Las complicaciones raras de las fracturas de la clavícula incluyen neumotórax o le-
siones neurovasculares.
● La mayoría de los niños tienen buenos resultados funcionales después de una frac-
tura de la clavícula, y las no uniones son extremadamente raras.
Evaluación
● Las fracturas de la clavícula en los recién nacidos pueden ser asintomáticas o estar
Gestión
● La mayoría de las fracturas de clavícula en niños y adolescentes se manejan de for-
ma no operativa.
● El manejo no operativo puede consistir en
⚬ Analgesia para ayudar a controlar el dolor
⚬ Inmovilización del hombro con un simple cabestrillo durante 3-4 semanas
⚬ Aumento gradual del rango de movimiento
⚬ Volver al fortalecimiento a las 6 semanas
● Se deben considerar los siguientes tipos de fracturas para el manejo quirúrgico:
⚬ Fracturas abiertas
⚬ Fracturas con perforación cercana a la piel
⚬ Implicación neurovascular
⚬ Lesión "otante en el hombro
● Para la fractura de la clavícula neonatal:
⚬ No se necesita un tratamiento especí!co
⚬ Considere el acetaminofén oral o rectal para el control del dolor
● La reducción abierta y la !jación interna con una placa y un tornillo contorneados
es el procedimiento quirúrgico más utilizado para las fracturas de la clavícula, pero
la !jación con un pasador intramedular también se utiliza para fracturas menos
complejas.
● El cable de Kirschner debe evitarse en la !jación de las fracturas de la clavícula debi-
Related Topics
● Clavicle Fracture in Adults
● Clavicle Fracture - Emergency Management
● Acromioclavicular (AC) Joint Injuries
● Acromioclavicular Separation - Emergency Management
General Information
Description
● fracture of the clavicle (collarbone) of the shoulder, typically resulting in acute
shoulder pain, bruising, tenderness, and limited range of motion (J Am Acad Orthop
Surg 2011 Jul;19(7):392)
Also Called
● broken collarbone
● collarbone fracture
● midshaft clavicle fracture
● distal clavicle fracture
● lateral clavicle fracture
● medial clavicle fracture
Types
● Allman classi!cation of clavicle fractures (most widely used)
⚬ group I: fracture of middle third of clavicle
⚬ group II: fracture of lateral (distal) third of clavicle
⚬ group III: fracture of medial (proximal) third of clavicle
⚬ References - J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967 Jun;49(4):774,
Epidemiology
Incidence/Prevalence
● clavicle is the most commonly fractured bone in the body 3
● clavicle fractures account for reported 10%-15% of all fractures in children (J Pediatr
Orthop 2012 Jun;32 Suppl 1:S1)
● reported > 90% of clavicle fractures in adolescents are midshaft fractures 1
● clavicle is most commonly injured bone during labor and delivery, accounting for
reported 90% of all obstetrical fractures and reported in 1%-7% of all births (Orthop
Nurs 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):210-4; quiz 215-6)
Risk Factors
● participation in all types of sports, including
⚬ cycling (may involve falling over the handlebars) (BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med
2016;2(1):e000042)
⚬ hockey (Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2017 May/Jun;46(3):123)
⚬ football (Int J Sports Med 2014 Jan;35(1):83)
⚬ wrestling (Orthop J Sports Med 2019 May;7(5):2325967119847470)
⚬ judo (Orthop J Sports Med 2019 May;7(5):2325967119847470)
⚬ weightlifting (powerlifting) (Scand J Med Sci Sports 2016 Oct;26(10):1233)
Associated Conditions
● neonatal clavicle fracture associated with brachial plexus birth palsy (Orthop Clin
North Am 2014 Apr;45(2):225 )
Pathogenesis
● clavicle forms by both endochondral and intramembranous ossi!cation 2
⚬ primary ossi!cation center of the clavicle appears in utero at about 5.5 weeks
gestation and continues to facilitate postnatal clavicular growth, which occurs via
intramembranous ossi!cation
⚬ lateral and medial growth centers appear in adolescence and contribute growth
at the ends of the clavicle via endochondral ossi!cation
– lateral epiphyseal growth center fuses at age 19 years
– medial epiphyseal growth center fuses at age 25 years
⚬ adolescent patients may have increased potential for remodeling of the clavicle
compared to adult patients 1
● bone healing begins immediately following injury
⚬ 2 potential healing pathways
– indirect bone healing (most common pathway)
● bone's natural healing process, which begins immediately following injury
● consists of both intramembranous and endochondral bone formation
Clinical Presentation
● clavicle fracture in infants and children
History
● ask about history of congenital disorders associated with increased risk of fracture,
including 3
⚬ oxalosis
⚬ osteogenesis imperfecta
● ask about 3
⚬ participation in sports
⚬ smoking history
● ask about any concerns about nonaccidental trauma (Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2019
Jun;58(6):618)
Physical
● if no history of trauma, look for signs of physical abuse (Am Fam Physician 2008 Jan
1;77(1):65, commentary can be found in Am Fam Physician 2008 Sep 15;78(6):697)
Clavicle
Assess the posterior aspect of the shoulder, and look for bruising or dimpling of the
skin in displaced fractures of the lateral end of the clavicle.
Lungs
● if pneumothorax suspected, assess for diminished breath sounds (J Emerg Trauma
Shock 2008 Jan;1(1):34)
● !ndings of pneumothorax may also include
⚬ decreased vocal resonance and tactile fremitus
⚬ increased tympany with percussion on a#ected side
⚬ unequal chest wall excursion
⚬ see Pneumothorax - Emergency Management for additional information
Neurovascular
Diagnosis
Di!erential Diagnosis
● in patients with history of trauma, other possible causes of shoulder pain include
⚬ acromioclavicular separation
⚬ sternoclavicular joint dislocation (rare)
⚬ proximal humerus fracture
Testing Overview
● x-rays are typically initial imaging method; standard views include 2
⚬ upright anteroposterior (AP) of site of injury (clavicle and ipsilateral shoulder)
⚬ upright AP with 30-degree cephalic tilt
● additional imaging may be needed
⚬ for assessing distal clavicle fractures (axillary lateral view of shoulder or magnetic
resonance imaging)
⚬ for assessing extent of other injuries, including possible pneumothorax (compu-
ted tomography)
⚬ if medial clavicle fracture suspected but initial x-rays not conclusive (computed
tomography)
● if signi!cant trauma, review imaging for other musculoskeletal injuries and lung
!elds for pneumothorax (J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018 Nov 15;26(22):e468)
X-ray
Distal (lateral) clavicle fractures may appear benign on an x-ray but can be associated with
signi!cant displacement. Look for signs of pain, bruising, or puckering of the skin in the
posterior aspect of the shoulder.
● CT not routinely used in patients with nondisplaced clavicle fractures (Skeletal Ra-
diol 2011 Jul;40(7):831)
● CT scans should be carefully considered given exposure to moderate levels of radia-
tion (Prim Care 2013 Dec;40(4):849)
● if medial clavicle fracture suspected and x-rays inconclusive, CT scan may be obtai-
ned (Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020 Jun;46(3):519)
● CT scan may also be used to
⚬ determine direction of displacement in medial clavicle fractures (Phys Sportsmed
2011 Sep;39(3):142)
⚬ determine direction and severity of displacement in lateral "clavicular sleeve"
physeal fracture (Radiographics 2016 Oct;36(6):1672)
⚬ di#erentiate between clavicle fractures and sternoclavicular joint dislocations
(Prim Care 2013 Dec;40(4):911)
⚬ help rule out pneumothorax if high clinical suspicion for injury and chest x-ray
and extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma are nondiagnos-
tic; see Pneumothorax - Emergency Management for additional information
Management
Management Overview
● focus of treatment on prevention of malunion and functional de!cits 2
● 3 factors di#erentiating clavicle fractures in children or adolescents from those in
adults 1
⚬ growth remaining; clavicle achieves 80% of its length by age
– 9 years in girls
– 12 years in boys
⚬ increased remodeling potential in children and adolescents
⚬ greater physical activity during childhood/adolescence
● most clavicle fractures in children are managed nonoperatively
⚬ no speci!c treatment necessary for neonatal clavicle fracture
⚬ sling typically preferred over !gure-of-8 bracing
⚬ nonoperative management of simple closed fractures may not require regular
orthopedic and radiographic follow-up
⚬ for displaced clavicle fractures in adolescents, good functional outcomes have
been reported for nonoperative management, but there are also reports of ma-
lunion after nonoperative management
● following types of fractures should be considered for surgery
⚬ indications for surgical treatment of clavicle fractures in children include
– open fractures
– fractures with near skin perforation
Nonoperative Management
● most clavicle fractures in children and adolescents managed nonoperatively 2
● nonoperative management may consist of 2
⚬ analgesia to help manage pain
⚬ immobilization of shoulder with a simple sling for 3-4 weeks
⚬ gradual increase in range of motion
⚬ return to strengthening at 6 weeks
● in neonates with clavicle fracture
⚬ no speci!c treatment is needed
⚬ oral or rectal acetaminophen can be used for pain management
⚬ Reference - Pediatr Rev 2016 Nov;37(11):451
STUDY
● SUMMARY
high rates of reunion and return to sports reported in children with mostly sim-
ple clavicle fractures managed nonoperatively; mean 4.2 radiographs/child re-
ported during combined treatment and follow-up DynaMed Level 3
COHORT STUDY: Pediatr Emerg Care 2018 Oct;34(10):706
Details
⚬ based on retrospective cohort study
⚬ 340 children aged 0.1-17.8 years managed for clavicle fractures at a single pedia-
tric hospital were included
⚬ 93% were simple fractures; 4.1% had skin tenting, 0.6% were open fractures, and
none had neurovascular involvement
⚬ fracture involvement
– middle third of clavicle in 82%
– distal (lateral) clavicle in 17.4%
– medial (proximal) clavicle in 0.6%
⚬ 98% managed nonoperatively
⚬ clinical and radiographic reunion occurred in all children, and all children retur-
ned to sports
● nonoperative management of simple closed fractures may not require regular ort-
hopedic and radiographic follow-up
STUDY
⚬ SUMMARY
simple clavicle fractures in adolescents < 16 years old managed with sling by
primary care physician reported to result in complete union, full range of mo-
tion, and no pain DynaMed Level 3
CASE SERIES: Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2017 May;56(5):467
Details
– based on case series
– 16 adolescents < 16 years old (88% male) with simple clavicle fractures were
treated conservatively with sling by primary care physician
– simple clavicle fractures included angulated, minimally displaced, or greens-
tick fractures
– no malunions and no nonunions occurred
– at mean follow-up of 83 days
● all adolescents had full range of motion
● no reports of painful bumps, paresthesias, or di$culties with daily activities
– Reference - Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2017 May;56(5):467
STUDY
⚬ SUMMARY
fracture shortening 15 mm at or near time of injury not associated with worse
functional outcomes in adolescents with displaced clavicle fracture managed
nonoperatively
COHORT STUDY: Injury 2015 Jul;46(7):1372
Details
– based on retrospective cohort study
– 22 adolescents (mean age 14 years, 77% male) with displaced clavicle fracture
treated nonoperatively had measurement of fracture shortening from x-ray
obtained at or near time of injury and were evaluated
● management consisted of sling plus non-weight-bearing for 2-4 weeks with
gradual return to activity at 1-3 months
● functional and subjective outcomes evaluated using Constant Score and
STUDY
⚬ SUMMARY
symptomatic malunion reported in 5 of 14 adolescents with displaced midshaft
clavicle fractures after nonoperative management DynaMed Level 3
CASE SERIES: J Pediatr Orthop 2010 Jun;30(4):307
Details
– based on case series
– 42 adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with 43 closed midshaft clavicle fractures
were included
● 25 adolescents treated nonoperatively with sling or !gure-of-8 brace for
mean 4 weeks
● 17 adolescents treated operatively with open reduction internal !xation
(ORIF)
– excluded from study were adolescents with open fracture, objective neurolo-
gic !ndings associated with neurovascular injury, or medical contraindication
Indications
● following types of clavicle fractures should be evaluated for surgery 1,2
⚬ open fractures
⚬ fractures with near skin perforation
⚬ fractures with neurovascular involvement
⚬ displaced clavicle fractures in "oating shoulder injuries
⚬ markedly displaced "clavicular sleeve" lateral physeal fractures that have poten-
tial for Y-shaped malunion of the clavicle after nonoperative management Case
Rep Orthop 2016;2016:4015212
"Poke hole" open fractures may be irrigated in the emergency department and treated
with oral antibiotics for 5-7 days. The need for surgery in fractures with near skin perfo-
ration may depend on the degree of skin tenting. Associated neurologic or vascular in-
jury should be thoroughly evaluated to determine the appropriateness of surgery. The
need for surgery in "oating shoulder injuries depends on the fracture pattern. Grossly
unstable injuries should be !xed on both sides. Relatively stable injury patterns may
bene!t from stable !xation of either the clavicle or humerus fracture.
● need for surgery in children and adolescents with 100% displaced fractures and/or
fractures with signi!cant shortening of clavicle (> 2 cm) is controversial 2
⚬ evidence in adults showing worse functional outcomes associated with nonope-
rative management compared to open reduction and !xation supports more fre-
quent operative management of clavicle fractures in adults
⚬ switch away from nonoperative management of clavicle fractures in adults has
in"uenced management decisions in adolescents
⚬ evidence too limited to know if outcomes improved with more frequent surgical
intervention in adolescents
● in younger adolescents aged 10-14 years, severe displacement may be an indication
for surgical management severity determined at discretion of treating surgeon 2
● other factors that may prompt consideration of surgical !xation include 1
⚬ marked comminution
⚬ polytrauma
⚬ vertical bone fragment
⚬ fractures of proximal (medial) or distal (lateral) part of the clavicle
⚬ signi!cant cosmetic deformity (Transl Med UniSa 2012 Jan;2:47)
Procedures
E"cacy
STUDY
● SUMMARY
elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) associated with similar improve-
ments in postoperative pain and function but better cosmesis compared to pla-
ting in children aged 10-14 years with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures
DynaMed Level 2
STUDY
● SUMMARY
high rate of return to full activity with minimal complications reported after open
reduction and fixation of completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in chil-
dren DynaMed Level 3
STUDY
● SUMMARY
intramedullary fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures reported to result
in return to sport at mean 18 weeks postinjury in adolescent athletes
DynaMed Level 3
STUDY
● SUMMARY
second surgery to remove hardware required in reported 28% of children with
displaced clavicle fracture after open reduction and internal fixation with plate
and screw
CASE SERIES: J Pediatr Orthop 2011 Jul-Aug;31(5):507
Details
⚬ based on case series
Early recognition is important to avoid this complication. A#ected patients will have ten-
derness, bruising, or skin puckering in the posterior aspect of the shoulder, near the
trapezius muscle. Surgical treatment with reduction of the fracture and repair of the
periosteal sleeve results in an anatomic or near-anatomic reconstruction. A computed
tomography scan may be indicated to accurately assess the position of the clavicle sin-
ce plain x-rays often underestimate the degree of displacement.
STUDY
● SUMMARY
good long-term functional outcomes reported after operative and nonoperative
management of distal clavicle fractures in children DynaMed Level 3
● cannulated screw !xation technique reported to result in full range of motion at 12-
month follow-up in 3 children (aged 8-17 years) with distal clavicle fracture associa-
ted with coracoclavicular ligament rupture in case series (J Trauma 2006
Jun;60(6):1358)
STUDY
● SUMMARY
successful closed reduction reported in adolescents with posterior sternoclavicu-
lar joint injuries treated within 24 hours of injury DynaMed Level 3
STUDY
● SUMMARY
surgical management of posterior sternoclavicular joint injuries reported to re-
sult in high rate of return to full activity in adolescents DynaMed Level 3
Postoperative Management
● postoperative management for midshaft clavicle fractures 2
⚬ sling for comfort worn for 2 weeks, and pendulum exercises allowed
⚬ range of motion is progressed from weeks 2 to 6
⚬ shoulder strengthening can commence at 6 weeks
⚬ contact sports can be resumed once full radiographic union and strength achie-
ved
● postoperative management for distal clavicle fractures
⚬ sling immobilization for 6 weeks
⚬ supine passive and active-assisted range-of-motion exercises begun immediately
⚬ active range-of-motion exercises started at 6 weeks
⚬ strengthening exercises beginning 6-12 weeks postoperatively
⚬ restricted from heavy labor or sports for 12 weeks
⚬ Reference - J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011 Jul;19(7):392
● postoperative management for proximal clavicle fractures
⚬ sling immobilization for 6 weeks until healing evident on radiograph
⚬ active-assisted shoulder stretching exercises beginning at 6 weeks
⚬ strengthening exercises at about 8 weeks, with return to sports at about 10
Complications
● potential, rare complications of clavicle fracture include 3
⚬ pneumothorax (rare)
⚬ neurovascular injuries
● reported complications from nonoperative management include 1,2
⚬ symptomatic malunion including pain, fatigability, and decreased endurance of
a#ected extremity
⚬ dissatisfaction with appearance of shoulder
Prognosis
General Prognosis
● nonunions exceedingly rare in children and adolescents 2
● only reported 10%-20% of malunions after clavicle fracture in adolescents are sym-
ptomatic (J Pediatr Orthop 2016 Jun;36 Suppl 1:S41)
● uncomplicated, closed isolated midshaft clavicle fractures treated with nonoperati-
ve management generally result in good functional outcomes 1
● neonatal clavicle fractures
⚬ generally heals rapidly with pain subsiding after callus formation (usually by 7-10
days)
⚬ patients typically have excellent outcomes without any long-term complications
⚬ References - Pediatr Rev 2016 Nov;37(11):451,
STUDY
● SUMMARY
increasing age and complete displacement associated with increased risk of com-
plications in children with clavicle fracture managed nonoperatively
COHORT STUDY: J Emerg Med 2012 Jul;43(1):29
STUDY
● SUMMARY
angulated fractures associated with increased risk of refracture compared to
completely displaced fractures in children
COHORT STUDY: J Orthop Trauma 2014 Nov;28(11):648
Details
⚬ based on cohort study
⚬ 161 children < 18 years old with clavicle fractures managed nonoperatively were
included
– 120 children had angulated fractures
– 41 children had completely displaced, nonangulated fractures
⚬ refracture de!ned as new fracture treated nonoperatively ≥ 1 year after initial
European Guidelines
Review Articles
● review of clavicle fractures in adolescents can be found in JBJS Rev 2018 Sep;6(9):e4
● review of clavicle fractures in adolescents can be found in Orthop Clin North Am
2017 Jan;48(1):47
● review of clavicle fractures in the emergency department can be found in Am J
Emerg Med 2021 Nov;49:315
● review of birth injuries in neonates can be found in Pediatr Rev 2016 Nov;37(11):451
● review of imaging and classi!cation of clavicle fractures can be found in Curr Probl
Diagn Radiol 2020 May-Jun;49(3):199
● review of management of simple clavicle fractures by primary care physicians can
be found in Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2017 May;56(5):467
MEDLINE Search
● to search MEDLINE for ([Clavicle fracture] AND [infant OR child]) with targeted
search (Clinical Queries), click therapy , diagnosis , or prognosis
Patient Information
● handout from EBSCO Health or in Spanish
● handout from Victorian Paediatric Orthopaedic Network PDF
● handout from KidsHealth or in Spanish
References
2. Yang S, Andras L. Clavicle Shaft Fractures in Adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am.
2017 Jan;48(1):47-58.
3. Burnham JM, Kim DC, Kamineni S. Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Critical Review. Ort-
hopedics. 2016 Sep 1;39(5):e814-21.
Special Acknowledgements
● DynaMed topics are written and edited through the collaborative e#orts of the abo-
ve individuals. Deputy Editors, Section Editors, and Topic Editors are active in clinical
Topic Editors de!ne the scope and focus of each topic by formulating a set of
clinical questions and suggesting important guidelines, clinical trials, and other
data to be addressed within each topic. Topic Editors also serve as consultants
for the internal DynaMed Editorial Team during the writing and editing process,
and review the !nal topic drafts prior to publication.
Section Editors have similar responsibilities to Topic Editors but have a broader
role that includes the review of multiple topics, oversight of Topic Editors, and
systematic surveillance of the medical literature.
Published by EBSCO Information Services. Copyright © 2024, EBSCO Information Services. All rights reserved. No
part of this may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission.
EBSCO Information Services accepts no liability for advice or information given herein or errors/omissions in the
text. It is merely intended as a general informational overview of the subject for the healthcare professional.