Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Semestre Neurorreanimación
Agosto 2019
Grupo de Neurointensivismo
TRATAMIENTO DE LA HIC
• APLICABLES A TODOS
• EFECTIVAS
TRATAMIENTO DE LA HIC
ESTRATEGIA PROGRESIVA
• ESCALONADA: NIVELES
TERAPÉUTICOS
• BALANCE RIESGO / BENEFICIO
(mayor complejidad e invasividad)
• ADITIVA
GUÍAS LABIC
REVISIONES COCHRANE
TRATAMIENTO DE LA HIC
DEFINICIÓN
• AUSENCIA DE RESPUESTA A
MEDIDAS DE PRIMER NIVEL (A TOPE)
15-30%
HIC REFRACTARIA
FISIOPATOLOGÍA
• VASORREACTIVIDAD CEREBRAL
• COMPLIANCE INTRACRANEANA
HIC REFRACTARIA
IMPACTO PRONÓSTICO
MORTALIDAD
60-70%
HIC REFRACTARIA
HERALDOS
1. HIPOXIA - HIPOTENSIÓN
2. SINDROME HERNIARIO PREVIO
3. SWELLING INTRAOPERATORIO
4. “OPEN PRESSURE” > 18 mm Hg
5. TRASTORNO DE CRASIS
6. HIPERLEUCOCITOSIS MANTENIDA
TRATAMIENTO DE LA HIC
GUÍAS DEL SUR
• BAJO COSTO
• AINE (EICOSANOIDES)
• ESPECIAL ACCIÓN CEREBRAL
• VASOMODULADOR
EFECTO DEL BOLO DE
INDOMETACINA SOBRE PIC
47,5 n= 11
45
35 34,4
PIC
25
21,3 23,6
15 16,4
9,2
5
t
ANTES DESPUES
P = 0.0001
BIESTRO Y COL
J NEUROSURG; 83:627-630, 199
INDOMETACINA
FSC-CMRO2
35% SN
10% NS
✓ MANTENIMIENTO DE LA PPC
✓ MEJORÍA DE AUTORREGULACIÓN
(Otras medidas resultan más efectivas)
INDOMETACINA
DOSIS
• BOLO 50 mg 15-20 min
• INFUSIÓN 30 mg/h
Abstract
Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of indomethacin and its effects on intracranial
pressure (ICP) in patients with neurological illness. All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health,
Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to July 2014), reference lists of
relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. Two reviewers independently identified all manuscripts utilizing
the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Humans, prospective studies (five or more patients), documented ICP response to indomethacin, and English.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
non-English, retrospective studies, no documentation of ICP response to indomethacin, and animal studies. A two-tier
filter of references was conducted. First, we screened manuscripts by title and abstract. Second, those references
passing the first filter were pulled, and the full manuscript was checked to see if it matched the criteria for inclusion.
Two reviewers independently extracted data including population characteristics and treatment characteristics. The
strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology. Our search strategy produced
a total of 208 citations. Twelve original articles, 10 manuscripts, and 2 meeting proceeding, were considered for the
review with all utilizing indomethacin, while documenting ICP in neurological patients. All studies were prospective.
Across all studies, there were a total of 177 patients studied, with 152 receiving indomethacin and 25 serving as
controls in a variety of heterogeneous studies. All but one study documented a decrease in ICP with indomethacin
administration, with both bolus and continuous infusions. No significant complications were described. There
currently exists Oxford level 2b, GRADE C evidence to support that indomethacin reduces ICP in the severe TBI
population. Similar conclusions in other populations cannot be made at this time.
Comments on its impact, on patient outcome, and side effects cannot be made given the
available data. At this time, indomethacin for ICP control remains experimental and
further prospective study is warranted.
TROMETAMINA (THAM)
0,3 M
ACETATO
• pH 8,6
• pk 7,82 (Bic. Na pK 6,1)
• 380 mOsmol/L
THAM
PROPIEDADES FARMACOLÓGICAS
• BASE DÉBIL
• CAPACIDAD AMORTIGUADORA
THAM
CAPACIDAD AMORTIGUADORA
PROPIEDADES FARMACOLÓGICAS
• PENETRACIÓN CELULAR
PROPIEDADES FARMACOLÓGICAS
• ELIMINACIÓN RENAL
• CONTRAINDICADO EN LA I. RENAL
THAM
MECANISMO DE ACCIÓN
• SE POSTULA:
3) AUTORREGULACION CEREBRAL?
ACCIÓN A DISTANCIA
THAM
INDICACIONES NEUROINJURIA
1- PIC REFRACTARIA
2- CORRECCIÓN DE HV ACCIDENTAL
3- IPA/DISTRESS
THAM y PIC
Experiencia CTI-HC
45
40,6 n=7
40
35
31,7
30
25
22,8
20 18,4
15
12,1
10
5,8
5
0
SINERGIA
HIPERVENTILACIÓN HIPOTERMIA
SSH?
THAM
INDICACIONES
2- CORRECCIÓN HV ACCIDENTAL
Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of tromethamine (THAM) and its effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) in
patients with neurological illness. All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the
International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to February 2014), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched.
Two reviewers independently identified all manuscripts pertaining to the administration of THAM in human patients that recorded effects on ICP.
Secondary outcomes of effect on cerebral perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, patient outcome, and adverse effects were recorded. Two
reviewers independently extracted data including population characteristics and treatment characteristics. The strength of evidence was
adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology. Our search strategy produced a total 2,268 citations. Twelve articles, 9
manuscripts, and 3 meeting proceedings were considered for the review with all utilizing THAM while documenting ICP in neurosurgical patients.
All studies were prospective. Across all studies, there were a total of 488 patients studied, with 263 receiving THAM and 225 serving as controls
in a variety of heterogeneous studies. All but one study documented a decrease in ICP with THAM administration, with both bolus and
continuous infusions. One study documented a reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure. No significant renal dysfunction, hepatocellular injury,
or hypoglycemia were reported.
Three prospective randomized control trials displayed trends to improved outcome in severe traumatic
brain injury (TBI) patients with THAM administration.
There currently exists Oxford level 2b, GRADE B evidence to support that THAM reduces ICP in the TBI and malignant ischemic infarct
population, with minimal side effects.
The literature suggests THAM may be useful for ICP reduction in certain cases, though the
safety of the compound in these circumstances is still unclear. Further prospective study
is warranted.
• FACTOR TIEMPO
TRATAMIENTO DE LA HIC
GUÍAS DEL SUR
• REPERCUSIÓN HEMODINÁMICA
• DOSIS <5 mg /K /h
• 3 - 4DÍAS
TRATAMIENTO DE LA HIC
REFRACTARIA
• AA EXCITATORIOS
1.NIVEL o GRADO
2.DURACIÓN (48hs o PIC)
3.RECALIENTAMIENTO PASIVO
4.NO asociar BBT
HIPOTERMIA TERAPÉUTICA
PROBLEMAS ¨VITALES¨
• HIPOTERMIA TERAPÉUTICA:
DESCOMPRESIVA
(1900)
DESCOMPRESIVA
DEFINICIÓN: procedimiento BIFÁSICO
• RESECCIÓN ÓSEA + DUROPLASTIA (Yoo 1999, PIVOT)
• CRANIECTOMÍA (1) CRANIOPLASTIA (2)
DIMENSIONES
• PUNTO CLAVE PARA QUE REALMENTE CUMPLA
SU ROL
AUMENTO
≥12 cm CAPACIDAD
INTRACRANEANA
FOSA TEMPORAL
DECOMPRESIVA TÉRMICA
37º
?
<36º
36.5º
DESCOMPRESIVA
CLASIFICACIÓN
• PRIMARIA
• SECUNDARIA
TIPOS
• BIFRONTAL
• TEMPORAL
• FOSA POSTERIOR
DESCOMPRESIVA
LATERAL
DESCOMPRESIVA
• HIC REFRACTARIA
¨…….ICP will be reduced, fewer episodes of intracranial
hypertension will occur, and functional outcome and quality of life
may be better than in children treated with medical management
alone¨.
DESCOMPRESIVA
CANDIDATOS
• < 60 AÑOS
• LESIÓN III- IV
• COMPROMISO SISTÉMICO Y/O
POLITRAUMA
TIMING
• < 48 horas
• HIC refractaria: >25
• En el contexto de manejo
progresivo
DESCOMPRESIVA
COMPLICACIONES
EN MAS o EXPANSIVAS EN MENOS o EXCAVADAS
• PIC ELEVADA • PIC BAJA
1. AGUDAS 1. Presentación ALEJADA
• HEMATOMAS 2. Agravados por PL y el
• LESIONES DE REPERFUSIÓN Ortostatismo
3. Mejoran con CRANIOPLASTIA
2. SUBAGUDA o CRÓNICA
• HIDROCEFALIA
Precedida por FÍSTULA LCR y/o
HIGROMA lateral/interhemisférico
DESCOMPRESIVA
SEMIOLOGÍA DE LA DESCOMPRESIVA
• HERIDA
• LATIDO
Kramer AH1,2,3, Deis N4,5, Ruddell S4, Couillard P4,5,6, Zygun DA7, Doig CJ4,8, Gallagher C4,5,6.
BACKGROUND:
In patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), multicenter randomized controlled trials have assessed
decompressive craniectomy (DC) exclusively as treatment for refractory elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP).
DC reliably lowers ICP but does not necessarily improve outcomes. However, some patients undergo DC as
treatment for impending or established transtentorial herniation, irrespective of ICP.
METHODS:
We performed a population-based cohort study assessing consecutive patients with moderate-severe TBI.
Indications for DC were compared with enrollment criteria for the DECRA and RESCUE-ICP trials.
RESULTS:
Of 644 consecutive patients, 51 (8 %) were treated with DC. All patients undergoing DC had compressed basal
cisterns, 82 % had at least temporary preoperative loss of ≥1 pupillary light reflex (PLR), and 80 % had >5 mm of
midline shift. Most DC procedures (67 %) were "primary," having been performed concomitantly with evacuation of
a space-occupying lesion. ICP measurements influenced the decision to perform DC in 18 % of patients. Only 10
and 16 % of patients, respectively, would have been eligible for the DECRA and RESCUE-ICP trials. DC improved
basal cistern compression in 76 %, and midline shift in 94 % of patients. Among patients with ≥1 absent PLR at
admission, DC was associated with lower mortality (46 vs. 68 %, p = 0.03), especially when the admission Marshall
CT score was 3-4 (p = 0.0005). No patients treated with DC progressed to brain death. Variables predictive of poor
outcome following DC included loss of PLR(s), poor motor score, midline shift ≥11 mm, and development of
perioperative cerebral infarcts.
CONCLUSIONS:
DC is most often performed for clinical and radiographic evidence of herniation, rather than for
refractory ICP elevation. Results of previously completed randomized trials do not directly apply
to a large proportion of patients undergoing DC in practice.
• RESURGIMIENTO
1.Pseudotumor Cerebral
2.Meningitis Criptocóccica
OPCIÓN
REQUISITOS
1. VENTRICULOSTOMÍA
2. CISTERNAS PRESENTES
3. AUSENCIA LESION MASA y/o DLM
DRENAJE LUMBAR
FUNDAMENTOS
• ESPACIO ESPINAL : > 50 % DE LCR
>30% DE LA COMPLIANCE CRANIOSPINAL
External lumbar drainage in uncontrollable intracranial pressure in adults with severe head injury: a
report of 7 cases.
Willemse RB, Egeler-Peerdeman SM.
CONTRAINDICACIONES
1.CIERRE INMEDIATO
2.POSICIÓN DE TRENDELENBURG
URGENTE
DRENAJE LUMBAR
?
Sindrome Levy-Rekate
EDEMA CEREBRAL
F. CENTRÍPETA SUMA ARITMÉTICA
Hipertensión Intracraneana
RESTA GIOMÉTRICA
HIDROCEFALIA
F. CENTRÍFUGA
¨Cisternas Presentes¨
PATRÓN SEUDONORMAL
Osmoterapia carga iv
HV 25-30 BBT bolo iv
SSH/Manitol
Neuromonitoreo
Multimodal
✓Si persiste HIC:
1-Chequear topes terapéuticos
Si disponemos DVE y continuamos de otras medidas de 1 Nivel utilizadas
Si se realizó Dsc. PIC
con HIC abrirla dado que es No contamos DVE 2- Si están al máximo, pasar al 2 y/o 3 N
usualmente controlada
altamente efectiva 3- Rechequear topes en la evolución
y mantener medidas al máximo mientra
continúe con HIC refractaria
THAM Indometacina
Descompresiva
Propofol Hipotermia Terapéutica Drenaje Lumbar
Secundaria