Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Septiembre 2006
Hidronefrosis prenatal
Fig. 1. Hidronefrosis grado 1 : pelvis renal está dilatada sin dilatación de los
cálices renales. (From Shimada K, Kakizaki H, Kubota M, et al. Standard
methodology for diagnosing dilatation of the renal pelvis and ureter
discovered in the fetus, neonate or infant. Int J Urol 2004;11(3):130)
Fig. 2. Hidronefrosis grado 2 : dilatación de la pelvis renal. Some of the calices
are dilated. (From Shimada K, Kakizaki H, Kubota M, et al. Standard
methodology for diagnosing dilatation of the renal pelvis and ureter
discovered in the fetus, neonate or infant. Int J Urol 2004;11(3):131)
Fig. 3. Grade 3 hydronephrosis: dilatation of the renal pelvis. All of calices are
dilated. (From Shimada K, Kakizaki H, Kubota M, et al. Standard
methodology for diagnosing dilatation of the renal pelvis and ureter
discovered in the fetus, neonate or infant. Int J Urol 2004;11(3):131)
Fig. 4. Hidronefrosis grado 4 : cálices protruídos en su forma y se extienden al
interior del parénquima.(From Shimada K, Kakizaki H, Kubota M, et al.
Standard methodology for diagnosing dilatation of the renal pelvis and ureter
discovered in the fetus, neonate or infant. Int J Urol 2004;11(3):131)
Evaluación postnatal
Manejo postnatal
Intervención quirúrgica
Reflujo vésicoureteral
Ureterocele
Mega-uréter
Uréter ectópico
Un riñón displásico multiquístico puede ser confundido con una UPJO severa.
La cuidadosa revisión de la ecografía y la evaluación de la función renal
diferencia entre los dos. En la ecografía , el riñón displásico multiquístico
muestra una colección de quistes renales de variado tamaño sin un quiste
central o intermedio más grande (fig. 9). Los estudios funcionales renales
demuestran < 10 % de función del riñón displásico multiquístico . Son más
comunes en el lado izquierdo, y las anomalías contralaterales incluyen UPJO
(3 - 12%) y VUR (18 - 43%) (58) .
Fig. 9. Multicystic dysplastic kidney with multiple, variable-sized cysts
without a central dominant cyst. (From Peters CA. Perinatal urology. In:
Walsh OC, Retik AB, Vaughn ED, et al, editors Campbell’s urology. 8th
edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002. p. 1787.)
Referencias
1. Grisoni ER, Gauderer MWL, Wolfson RN, et al. Antenatal
ultrasonography: the experience in a high risk perinatal center. J
Pediatr Surg 1986;21:358– 61.
2. D’Ottavio G, Mandruzzato G, Meir YJ, et al. Comparisons of first and
second trimester screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci
1998;847:200–9.
3. Whitlow BJ. The value of sonography in early pregnancy for the
detection of fetal abnormalities in an unselected population. Br J
Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:929– 36.
4. Taipale P, Ammala M, Salonen R, et al. Two-stage ultrasonography in
screening for fetal anomalies at 13–14 and 18–22 weeks of gestation.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:1141– 6.
5. Elder JS. Antenatal hydronephrosis: fetal and neonatal management.
Pediatr Clin North Am 1997;44(5):1299– 321.
6. Mandell J, Peters C. Perinatal urology. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB,
Stamey TA, et al, editors. Campbell’s urology. 7th edition.
Philadelphia7 WB Saunders; 1998. p. 247– 8.
7. Siemens DR, Prouse KA, MacNeily AE, et al. Antenatal
hydronephrosis: thresholds of renal pelvic diameter to predict
insignificant postnatal pelvicaliectasis. Tech Urol 1998;4(4):198 –201.
8. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, et al. Urinary tract dilatation in
utero: classification and clinical application. Radiology
1986;160(3):645– 51.
9. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of
hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for
Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:478– 80.
10. Lim DJ, Park JY, Kim JH, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome
of hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasonography. J Korean
Med Sci 2003;18(6):859–62.
11. Chevalier R, Howards S. Renal function in the fetus, neonate, and
child. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al, editors. Campbell’s
urology. 8th edition. Philadelphia7 WB Saunders; 2002. p. 1766.
12. Rabinowitz R, Peters MT, Vyas S, et al. Measurement of fetal urine
production in normal pregnancy by real-time ultrasonography. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1264– 6.
13. Curran M, Nijland MJ, Mann SE, et al. Human amniotic fluid
mathematical model: determination and effect of intramembranous
sodium flux. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178(3):484– 90.
14. Nakayama DK, Harrison MR, deLorimier AA. Prognosis of posterior
urethral valves presenting at birth. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:43 – 5.
15. Manning FA, Harrison MR, Rodeck C. Catheter shunts for fetal
hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus: report of the International Fetal
Surgery Registry. N Engl J Med 1986;315:336– 40.
16. Glick PL, Harrison MR, Golbus MS, et al. Management of the fetus
with congenital hydronephrosis. II. Prognostic criteria and selection
for treatment. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20(4):376–87.
17. Freedman AL, Johnson MP, Gonzalez R. Fetal therapy for obstructive
uropathy: past, present. . ..future? Pediatr Nephrol 2000;14(2):167–
76.
18. Walker RD, Padron M. The management of posterior urethral valves
by initial vesicostomy and delayed valve ablation. J Urol
1990;144(5):1212– 4.
19. Reinberg Y, Gonzalez R, Fryd D, et al. The outcome of renal
transplantation in children with posterior urethral valves. J Urol
1988;140(6):1491–3.
20. Docimo SG, Silver RI. Renal ultrasonography in newborns with
prenatally detected hydronephrosis: why wait? J Urol
1997;157(4):1387–9.
21. Wiener J, Ohara S. Optimal timing of initial postnatal
ultrasonography in newborns with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol
2002;168(4, Suppl 2):1826– 9.
22. Ransley PG, Dhillon HK, Gordon I, et al. The postnatal management
of hydronephrosis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound. J Urol
1990;144:584–7.
23. Koff SA. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis using an
observational approach [editorial comment]. Urology 2000;55:609.
24. Farhat W, McLorie G, Deary D, et al. The natural history of neonatal
reflux associated with antenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 2000 ;
164(3):1057– 60.
25. Brophy M, Austin F, Yan Y, et al. Vesicoureteral reflux and clinical
outcomes in infants with prenatally detected hydronephrosis. J Urol
2002;168:1716 –9.
26. Ismaili K, Avni FE, Hall M, and the Brussels Free University Perinatal
Nephrology (BFUPN) Study Group. Results of systematic voiding
cystourethrography in infants with antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis
dilation. J Pediatr 2002;141(1):21 –4.
27. Yerkes E, Adams M, Pope JC, et al. Does every patient with prenatal
hydronephrosis need voiding cystourethrography? J Urol
1999;162:1218 –20.
28. Vates TS, ShullMJ, Underberg-Davis SJ, et al. Complications of
voiding cystourethrography in the evaluation of infants with prenatally
detected hydronephrosis. J Urol 1999;162(3, Suppl 2):1221–3.
29. Herndon CD, McKenna PH, Kolon T, et al. A multicenter outcomes
analysis of patients with neonatal reflux presenting with prenatal
hydronephrosis. J Urol 1999;162:1203– 8.
30. Livera LN, Brookfield DS, Egginton JA, et al. Antenatal
ultrasonography to detect fetal renal abnormalities: a prospective
screening programme. BMJ 1989;298(6685):1421– 3.
31. Lowe F, Marshall SF. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.
Urology 1984;23:331– 5.
32. Brown T, Mandell J, Lebowitz RL. Neonatal hydronephrosis in the
sonographic era. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148(5):959–63.
33. Wiener JS, Emmert GK, Mesrobian HG, et al. Are modern imaging
techniques over diagnosing ureteropelvic junction obstruction? J Urol
1995;154(2, Suppl 2):659– 61.
34. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. The longterm followup of newborns
with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively.
J Urol 2000;164(3, Suppl 2):1101– 15.
35. Dhillon HK. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond
Street Experience. BJU 1998;81(Suppl 2):39–44.
36. Palmer L, Maizels M, Cartwright P, et al. Surgery versus observation
for managing obstructive grade 3 to 4 unilateral hydronephrosis: a
report from the Society for Fetal Urology. J Urol 1998; 159:222– 8.
37. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, et al. Retroperitoneal
laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol
2005;173(5):1710– 3.
38. Paltiel HJ, Lebowitz RL. Neonatal hydronephrosis due to primary
vesicoureteric reflux: trends in diagnosis and treatment. Radiology
1989;170(3, Suppl 1):787– 9.
39. Kaplan GW, Scherz HC. Posterior urethra. In: Kelalis P, King L,
Belman AB, et al, editors. Clinical pediatric urology. 3rd edition.
Philadelphia7 WB Saunders; 1992. p. 835.
40. Gloor JM. Management of prenatally detected fetal hydronephrosis.
Mayo Clin Proc 1995; 70(2):145– 52.
41. Kitagawa H, Pringle KC, Stone P, et al. Postnatal followup of
hydronephrosis detected by prenatal ultrasound: the natural history.
Fetal Diagn Ther 1998;13(1):19 – 25.
42. Hutton KA, Thomas DF, Davies BW. Prenatally detected posterior
urethral valves: qualitative assessment of second trimester scans and
prediction of outcome. J Urol 1997;158(3, Suppl 2): 1022– 5.
43. El Ghoneimi A, DesgrippesA, Luton D, et al. Outcome of posterior
urethral valves: to what extent is it improved by prenatal diagnosis? J
Urol 1999;162(3, Suppl 1):849– 53.
44. Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Ectopic ureter, ureterocele, and other
anomalies of the ureter. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al,
editors. Campbell’s urology. 8th edition. Philadelphia7 WB Saunders;
2002. p. 2022.
45. Coplen DR, Duckett JW. The modern approach to ureteroceles. J Urol
1995;153(1):166–71.
46. Soothill PW, Bartha JL, Tizard J. Ultrasound guided laser treatment
for fetal bladder outlet obstruction resulting from ureterocele. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 2003;188(4):1107– 8.
47. Quintero RA, Homsy Y, Bornick PW, et al. In-utero treatment of fetal
bladder outlet obstruction by a ureterocele. Lancet 2001;357:1947– 8.
48. Hansen WF, Cooper CS, Yankowitz J. Ureterocele causing
anhydramnios successfully treated with percutaneous decompression.
Obstet Gynecol 2002;99(5, Suppl 2):953– 6.
49. Bolduc S, Upadhyay J, Sherman C, et al. Histology of the upper pole is
unaffected by prenatal diagnosis in duplex system ureteroceles. J Urol
2002;168(3):1123– 6.
50. Van Savage JG, Mesrobian HG. The impact of prenatal
ultrasonography on the morbidity and outcome of patients with renal
duplication anomalies. J Urol 1995;153(3):768– 70.
51. Hulbert WC, Rabinowitz R. Prenatal diagnosis of duplex system
hydronephrosis: effect on renal salvage. Urology 1998;52(Suppl 2):23.
52. Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Fleming P, et al. Long-term outcome based
on the initial surgical approach to ureterocele. J Urol 1999;162(part
2):1072– 6.
53. Upadhyay J, Bolduc S, Braja L, et al. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on
the morbidity associated with ureterocele management. J Urol
2002;167(6):2560– 5.
54. Williams DI, Hulme-Moir I. Primary obstructive mega-ureter. Br J
Urol 1970;42(2):140 –9.
55. Smith ED. Report of working party to establish an international
nomenclature for the large ureter. In: Bergsman D, Duckett JW,
editors. Birth defects. Original Articles Series 1977;13(5):3–8.
56. Schulman CC. The single ectopic ureter. Eur Urol 1976;2(2):64–9.
57. Ellerker AG. The extravesical ectopic ureter. Br J Surg 1958;45:344.
58. Atiyeh B, Husmann D, Baum M. Contralateral renal abnormalities in
multicystic-dysplastic kidney. J Pediatr 1992;121(1):65 –7.