.

Anexo 2
Tarea 3 - Disoluciones y gases
Tablas para el desarrollo de los ejercicios.
Gumer Fabián arenas Código (documento de
Nombre y apellidos: 1120583952
Saldaña identidad)
Nombre del tutor: Nira Díaz Programa académico: zootecnia

Ejercicio 1. Leyes de los gases ideales

Tabla 1. Leyes de los gases ideales

Número de
Ley de Boyle Ley de Charles Ley de Gay-Lussac
estudiante
p2=3,75 mmhg p2=1,63 atm
5 v 2=53,18 l
Escriba aquí abajo el procedimiento matemático.
Ley de charles
v1∗p 1=v2∗p 2 v 2=53,18l
1 mmhg Ley de gay- Lussac
2.5 l∗4,50 torr =3l∗p 2
1 torr p1 P 2
p2=3.75 mmhg =
T1 T2

Ley de charles p1
v1 v2 T =p
= T1 2 2
T1 T2 1.52 atm
( 321 )= p2
25+273.15
23 l v2
=
32℉ 74 ℉ p2=1,63 atm
.

Ejercicio 2: Gases ideales

Tabla 2. Gases ideales
Número de
estudiante Gases ideales

5 Datos

1 mm Hg 1 atm
p1=85 torr =0.118 atm
1 torr 760 mm Hg
v1 =4 l
T 1=72+273=345 k

Como el n no cambia de un estado a otro tenemos

P1V 1 P2V 2
=
RT 1 R T 2

P1V 1 P2V 2
=
T1 T2

P1V 1
T =P2
T1 V 2 2

0.118 atm∗4 l∗(473 k)

=P2
3 1000 l
345 k∗5 m 3
1m

91.29 x 10−4 atm=P 2

II)
.

3
V 2=10 m

p2=6 atm

P1V 1 P2V 2
=
T1 T2

P2V 2T 1
T 2=
P1 V 1

6 atm∗10 m3∗345 k
T 2= 3
1m
0.118 atm∗4 l
1000 l

T 2=43855932 k

Ejercicio 3: Soluciones.
Tabla 3. Soluciones
Número Datos del ejercicio
de I II III
estudiante
.

gr
∗1 mol
ml
∗69 %
63,01 gr mol
1,51 =0.0165
100 % ml
Oluto Cuál es el % peso a peso Fracción molar
mol de la concentración final
∗1000 ml
ml moles
0.0165 =16.5
1l Litro
p masa del soluto
Luego cual es la cantidad de soluto % = acido∗1 mol
que necesito para alcanzar esta p masa de solucion 24,70 gr de =0,392
63,01 gr
Preparar 150 ml 1.8 m solución
solucion=soluto+ solvente
1mol
133,65 gr * =7,425 mol
5 Se encuentra al 1,51 gr 18 gr
16,36 ml =24,70 gr
69% con densidad moles 1l ml
1,8 ∗150 ml =0,27 moles
1.51 gr/ml Litros 1000 ml
1 gr
133,65 ml =133,65 gr solucion=0,392+7,45
ml
solucion=7,817 moles
0,27∗1 L p 24,70 gr
=0,0163 l % =
16,5 moles p 24,70 gr +133,65 gr 0,392
fracciones de soluto=
7,817
Luego para preparar esa solución se p
necesitarían % =15 %
p fracion del soluto=0.05

16,36 ml del acido

133,65 ml de agua

Escriba aquí abajo el procedimiento matemático.

.

Ejercicio 4: Aplicación del tema

Tabla 4. Aplicación del tema asignado

Número Área de Referencia bibliográfica Párrafo
de campo
estudiante asignada
3 zootecnia http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rccp/v18n1/v18n1a06.pdf The gas methane in the cattle production and alternative
to measure its emissions and to lessen its impact at
environmental and productive level The ruminants are
great contributors to the global heating and
deterioration of the ozone layer, by the liberation of
high amounts of gases to the atmosphere, among them,
the carbon dioxide gas and the methane. The methane
produced in rumen is generated mainly by fermentative
processes of the food that enters to rumen. The main
biotic factor at level of rumen in the methane
production are the metanogenic anaerobic bacteria.
These bacterias use different substrates for the methane
production, but the main ones are the H2 and the CO2 .
The elimination of these gases, mainly of the H2 implies
the removal of a factor implied in the stability of pH
ruminal being this essential for an optimal fermentation.
But at the same way this methane production is
considered like a loss of potentially usable energy. The
effects of the metanogenic bacteria are employees
mainly of the present substrates in the diet and of the
interactions with other populations. Interventions in the
feeding offered to the animals, oriented towards
optimizing the process of ruminal fermentation, repel
generally in an improvement of the productive and
reproductive parameters, had, among other aspects, to
.

one better use of the energy. In addition, the diminution

of the emissions to the atmosphere receives great
importance in the protection of the environment. The
diverse evidences show that the rate of methane
emission by ruminal fermentation, is related to the
characteristics physical-chemistries of the diet, which
affect the level of consumption and the frequency of
feeding. By this the subnutrition contributes to increase
the methane emissions. The possibility of limiting the
methane emissions by the cattle in tropical production
systems, provides economic and environmental
benefits. A reduction option consists of the substitution
of conventional technologies by new concomitants
alternatives with a suitable production and minimums
environmental effects. Within these alternatives of
potential use in tropic it is the handling of pastures,
tending towards improving his quality. An alternative of
wide potential and that until the moment has taken
force by its multiple benefits are the silvopastoral
systems, but little has investigated its effect on the
ruminal methane production. For the determination of
emissions and the efficiency of the implemented
alternatives, one is due to resort to appropriate
methodologies that allows to extrapolate the results to
the real conditions in alive. Within these alternatives,
the system in vitro RUSITEC, has presented a high
correlation with the own characteristics of the animal.
The objective of this revision is to visualize different
factors that determine the methane emissions,
measurement alternatives and options to diminish the
production of this gas in the cattle systems, for the sake
of a more efficient production and than it protects the
environment
.

Referencia (Normas APA):

Registre en este espacio las referencias bibliográficas de consulta.

 Brown, T., Lemay, E., Murphy, C., Bursten, B., Woodward, P. (2014). Química, la ciencia central. (pp. 383-402, 425-440,
513-529, 530-550). Biblioteca Virtual UNAD http://www.ebooks7-24.com.bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/?il=971&pg=431
 Chang, R. Goldsby, K. (2013). Química. (12a. ed.). (pp. 172-227, 465-517, 518-531, 532-546) Biblioteca Virtual UNAD
http://www.ebooks7-24.com.bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co/?il=5202&pg=203