Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Keywords:
Low density aBSTRACT RESUMEN
lipoprotein, PCSK9
inhibitor, evolocumab, Introduction: A new target level for low-density lipoprotein Introducción: Se ha establecido un nuevo nivel objetivo de
ischemic heart disease, cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established in patients at lipoproteína de baja densidad (C-LDL) en pacientes con muy
cholesterol. very high cardiovascular risk. However, treatment with alto riesgo cardiovascular. Sin embargo, no se ha evaluado
evolocumab combined with atorvastatin to attain this si el tratamiento con evolocumab en combinación con ator-
Palabras clave: target level has not been evaluated. Objective: To evaluate vastatina permite alcanzar estos niveles. Objetivo: Evaluar
Lipoproteína de baja the efficacy of evolocumab to achieve the target LDL-C la eficacia de evolocumab para lograr los niveles objetivo
densidad, inhibidor levels in patients with ischemic heart disease at very high de C-LDL en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica y muy alto
PCSK9, evolocumab, cardiovascular risk. Material and methods: Twenty patients riesgo cardiovascular. Material y métodos: Veinte pacientes
cardiopatía isquémica, with ischemic heart disease at very high cardiovascular con cardiopatía isquémica y muy alto riesgo cardiovascular
colesterol. risk were treated with evolocumab and atorvastatin for 24 fueron tratados con evolocumab más atorvastatina durante
weeks. Levels of serum LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein 24 semanas. Se determinaron los niveles de C-LDL, C-HDL,
cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, and triglycerides colesterol total y triglicéridos en suero antes y después del
were determined before and after treatment. Results: After 24 tratamiento. Resultados: Después de las 24 semanas de tra-
weeks of treatment, an average percentage reduction of 55% tamiento, se obtuvo un promedio del porcentaje de reducción
for LDL-C was obtained, and 11 of the 20 patients reached de C-LDL de 55% y 11 de los 20 pacientes alcanzaron los
the target levels for LDL-C. No differences were found in the niveles objetivos de C-LDL. No se encontraron diferencias
levels of HDL-C or triglycerides. Conclusions: evolocumab en los niveles de (lipoproteínas de alta densidad) HDL ni de
treatment was safe, effective, and reduced the concentration triglicéridos. Conclusiones: El tratamiento con evolocumab
of LDL-C in all patients. However, the target level for LDL-C fue seguro y eficaz, ya que redujo la concentración de C-LDL
was only reached in half of the patients. en todos los pacientes; sin embargo, sólo se alcanzó el nivel
objetivo de C-LDL en la mitad de los pacientes.
www.medigraphic.com/cms www.cardiovascularandmetabolicscience.org.mx
Ramos-Martínez JC et al. Treatment with evolocumab in ischemic heart disease 67
infarction that does not respond to Recently, the European Society of Cardiology
statin therapy.2,3 (ESC) has set new targets in managing of
In the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes patients at very high cardiovascular risk. A
Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects target concentration of LDL-C ≤ of 55 mg/dL
with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial, treatment with a reduction of more than 50% has been
with evolocumab for 48 weeks reduced LDL-C established.9 These targets are more ambitious
levels from an average of 92 to 30 mg/dL, with than recommendations outlined in 2016.10
an average percentage reduction of 59% (95% Therefore, therapies that combine a PCSK9
CI, 58-60). Also, evolocumab reduced the inhibitor and statins are a treatment option to
risk of cardiovascular events, non-HDL-C and achieve the new target LDL-C concentrations in
apolipoprotein B levels.4 patients at very high cardiovascular risk.
In the YUKAWA-2 (Study of LDL- Despite the benefits of evolocumab shown
Cholesterol Reduction Using a Monoclonal in previous studies, this drug’s general use
PCSK9 Antibody in Japanese Patients is uncommon due to its relatively high cost
with Advanced Cardiovascular Risk) trial, compared to statins.11 Thus, a cost-benefit
performed in Japanese individuals at high assessment of treatment with evolocumab
risk of cardiovascular disease, evolocumab in should first be considered. 12 As shown in
combination with atorvastatin was found to previous studies, the benefit of this treatment
reduce LDL-C concentration by 60-70%. The depends on the intrinsic characteristics of
increased reduction in LDL-C concentration the population to be treated.6 Therefore, it is
of this trial, compared to the FOURIER4 and necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety
LAPLACE-2 (LDL-C Assessment with PCSK9 of evolocumab treatment and to establish
Monoclonal Antibody Inhibition Combined whether the new objectives set by the ESC for
With Statin Therapy)5 trials, is due to intrinsic patients at very high cardiovascular risk can be
differences in the Japanese population at high achieved. In the present study, we evaluated
cardiovascular risk and not to complementary levels of LDL-C, HDL-C, total cholesterol, and
treatments or the baseline levels of LDL-C or triglycerides, before and after treatment with
PCSK9.6 Other phase III clinical trials have been evolocumab in combination with atorvastatin.
consistent in showing a reduction of LDL-C with Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of
evolocumab treatment.7,8 evolocumab to achieve the target LDL-C levels
in patients with ischemic heart disease at very
high cardiovascular risk.
Table 1: Clinical characteristics of the patients studied.
Material and methods
Patient characteristics Number of patients
A pre-experimental study was conducted and
Total patients 20 approved by the Committee of Health Research
Age 58 ± 9.9 years and Ethics Research with registration number
Females 6 043/18. The procedures followed were per
Diabetes mellitus 2 10 relevant clinical research ethics committee
Systemic arterial hypertension 18 regulations and with those of the Code of Ethics
Smoking 11 of the World Medical Association (declaration
Dyslipidemia 20 of Helsinki). Twenty patients with a diagnosis of
Ischemic heart disease 20 ischemic heart disease diagnosed by coronary
Previous cardiovascular complications 20 angiography were included in the study.
Pre-treatment The patients were treated at the Cardiology
Statin 17 Department of the Instituto de Seguridad
Fibrates 4 Social del Estado de México y Municipios. The
Ezetimibe 4 inclusion criteria for this study were males
Statin intolerance 1 and females 18 years or older, diagnosis of
ischemic cardiopathy, and failure to reach
A Statistical analysis
400 p = 0.0006
The results are reported as a mean ± S.E.M.
300 Data were checked for normality with the
LDL-C (mg/dL)
Figure 1: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the Wilcoxon
200 matched-pairs test was performed. All statistical
Treatment with analyses were performed with the GraphPad
evolocumab decreases Prisma software version 5.
100
the concentration
of LDL-C but not Results
0
HDL-C in plasma. Before After
The graph shows the The patients treated included six women and
concentration in mg/ B 14 men of mixed race, with an average age of
n.s.
dL of LDL-C (A) 80 58 ± 9.9 years. All patients presented previous
and HDL-C (B) of cardiovascular complications, 20 patients had
20 patients before acute coronary ischemic syndrome, a patient
60
and after treatment had ventricular tachycardia, and another had a
HDL-C (mg/dL)
although not attributed as a side effect. objective of the present study was to evaluate
No neurocognitive adverse events were if the target level of LDL-C could be achieved
observed either. in the Mexican population without having
to use an additional drug. Using two drugs
Discussion is advantageous because it allows for greater
adherence to treatment. Administration of
In our study, patients at very high cardiovascular more than two drugs correlates with poor
risk were treated with 140 mg of evolocumab treatment adherence, a key factor in lipid-
every two weeks, combined with atorvastatin. lowering therapies.16
Clinical trials of evolocumab, alone or in The average percentage reduction of
combination with statins, have shown that LDL-C concentration in this work was
treatment with 140 mg every two weeks or with 55% (95% CI, 45-65). This percentage of
420 mg once a month are of equal efficacy.4,6,8 reduction was similar to the one obtained
Patients had previously been treated with in the FOURIER trial, where an average
ezetimibe in combination with high-intensity percentage reduction for LDL-C of 59% (95%
statins, yet LDL-C levels were not achieved. For CI, 58-60) was obtained.4 The significant
this reason, it was decided to add evolocumab variability in our results can be attributed
to the therapy, in combination with a high- to the sample size. In the YUKAWA-2 trial,
intensity statin. Dual therapy was maintained a 75.9% reduction in LDL-C concentration
in our study, but in a Mexican population, as was found in Japanese patients at very high
in the YUKAWA-2 and LAPLACE-2 studies, cardiovascular risk treated with 140 mg of
since in these studies a significant reduction evolocumab every two weeks combined with
of LDL-C was achieved and the target levels 20 mg/day of atorvastatin.6 This percentage
of LDL-C were reached.6,15 Therefore, the reduction was higher than that reported in
our study, although the atorvastatin dose in
our study was four times higher. This more
A significant reduction in LDL-C concentration
Figure 2: p = 0.0002 was not due to the differences at the baseline
400
level since the YUKAWA-2 trial baseline
Treatment with was 109 ± 35 mg/dL, and in our study, the
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
evolocumab reduces 300 baseline was 138 ± 67 mg/dL, which are not
the concentration statistically different. Although the reduction
of total cholesterol 200 in LDL-C in our study was not as pronounced
in plasma but as that observed in the YUKAWA-2 trial, 11
not triglyceride 100 of 20 patients managed to achieve an LDL-C
concentration. The concentration ≤ 55 mg/dL, the recommended
graph shows the 0 level by the ESC.
concentration in mg/dL Before After In our work, we did not find an increase
of total cholesterol (A) in HDL-C concentration after treatment with
and triglycerides (B) B Evolocumab. However, other studies have
n.s.
of 20 patients before 1,000 reported an increase in HDL-C levels. For
and after treatment example, in the YUKAWA-2 trial, evolocumab
with evolocumab. The increased HDL-C by 10-17%.6,17 A direct
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
800
horizontal lines indicate mechanism can be attributed to this increase
the mean and standard 600 in HDL-C concentration has not been
error. Total cholesterol evaluated yet. However, a possible indirect
400
and triglyceride mechanism may act through the decrease in the
concentrations were concentration of LDL-C, which would affect the
200
compared with the enzymatic activity of cholesteryl ester transfer
Wilcoxon matched- 0 protein, an enzyme that transfers cholesterol
pairs test. Before After from HDL to LDL.6
In previous reports, there has been a low scholarship provided to Edgar Gustavo Ramos
rate of complications inherent to treatment Martínez with number 511-6/2019.-15976.
with evolocumab. In the FOURIER study,
only 0.1% of patients stopped treatment References
due to reactions at the puncture site.4 In our 1. Seidah NG, Awan Z, Chrétien M, Mbikay M. PCSK9:
study, there were no complications related a key modulator of cardiovascular health. Circ Res.
to medications, and all patients finished the 2014; 114 (6): 1022-1036.
entire treatment. No cases of neurocognitive 2. C a t a p a n o A L , Pi r i l l o A , N o r a t a G D. N e w
pharmacological approaches to target PCSK9. Curr
adverse events were reported after 24 weeks Atheroscler Rep. 2020; 22 (7): 24.
of treatment. Long-term studies such as 3. Deibe FL, Pardo DE, Martínez IP. Actualidad de los
EBBINGHAUS (Evaluating PCSK9 Binding Inhibidores de la PCSK9. [PCSK9 Inhibitors Update].
antiBody Influence oN coGnitive HeAlth Rev Clínica Med Fam. 2019; 12(3):125-131.
4. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N,
in High cardiovascUlar Risk Subjects) study Wiviott SD, Murphy S et al. Evolocumab and clinical
did not find differences in cognitive function outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N
between patients treated with evolocumab Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1713-1722.
and the placebo group, as well.18 5. Robinson JG, Nedergaard BS, Rogers WJ, Fialkow J,
Neutel JM, Ramstad D et al. Effect of evolocumab
A limitation of the present study is the lack or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity
of ezetimibe as a complementary treatment. statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with
Possibly, the combined use of the three therapies hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized
(evolocumab, atorvastatin, and ezetimibe) will clinical trial. JAMA. 2014; 311 (18): 1870-1882.
6. Kiyosue A, Honarpour N, Kurtz C, Xue A, Wasserman
allow a greater number of patients to achieve SM, Hirayama A. A phase 3 study of evolocumab
target C-LDL levels. Although this study has (AMG 145) in statin-treated Japanese patients at high
its limitations such as the length of time for cardiovascular risk. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117 (1): 40-47.
treatment and sample size, results showed 7. Blom DJ, Hala T, Bolognese M, Lillestol MJ, Toth PD,
Burgess L et al. A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of
that treatment with evolocumab combined evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;
with atorvastatin reduces LDL-C concentration 370: 1809-1819.
to the recommended levels. However, not all 8. Stroes E, Robinson JG, Raal FJ, Dufour R, Sullivan D,
the patients achieved the LDL-C target level, Kassahun H et al. Consistent LDL-C response with
evolocumab among patient subgroups in PROFICIO: A
and given the high cost of the drug, cost- pooled analysis of 3146 patients from phase 3 studies.
benefit analyses are required to assess therapy Clin Cardiol. 2018; 41 (10): 1328-1335.
with evolocumab. 9. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula
M, Badimon L et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the
management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification
Conclusions to reduce cardiovascular risk The Task Force for the
management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society
A 55% reduction in LDL-C concentration was of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis
observed in patients treated with evolocumab Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2020; 41 (1): 111-188.
10. Catapano AL, Graham I, Backer G De, Wiklund O,
in combination with atorvastatin. The Chapman MJ, Drexel H, et al. Guías ESC/EAS 2016
LDL-C level recommended by the ESC sobre el tratamiento de las dislipidemias. [ESC/EAS
was reached in 11 of the 20 patients 2016 guide on the treatment of dyslipemias]. Rev
treated. Given the high cost of treatment Española Cardiol. 2017; 70(2):115.e1-115.e64.
11. de Labry Lima A, Ballester VG, Sánchez JFS, Hoces
with evolocumab, additional strategies are AM, González-Outón J, del Rey EJ. Coste-efectividad e
required to achieve the target LDL-C level impacto presupuestario del tratamiento con evolocumab
in a greater patients population. frente a estatinas y ezetimiba para la hipercolesterolemia
en España. [Cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact of
treatment with evolocumab versus statins and ezetimibe
Acknowledgements for hypercholesterolemia in Spain]. Rev Española
Cardiol. 2018; 71(12):1027-1035.
The authors thank Ivan Emmanuel Ramos- 12. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher
Martinez and Eduardo Pérez Campos for their KK, Blumenthal R et al. 2018 Guideline on the
management of blood cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol.
reviews and editorial assistance. We thank the 2019; 73 (24): e285-e350.
Secretaría de Educación Pública-Subsecretaría de 13. Black SA, Espino DV, Mahurin R, Lichtenstein
Educación Superior (SEP-SES), Mexico, for the MJ, Hazuda HP, Fabrizio D et al. The influence
of noncognitive factors on the Mini-Mental State for hypercholesterolemia: the MENDEL-2 randomized,
Examination in older Mexican-Americans: findings controlled phase III clinical trial of evolocumab. J Am
from the Hispanic EPESE. Established Population Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63 (23): 2531-2540.
for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly. J Clin 18. Giugliano RP, Mach F, Zavitz K, Kurtz C, Im K, Kanevsky
Epidemiol. 1999; 52 (11): 1095-1102. E et al. Cognitive function in a randomized trial of
14. Llamas-Velasco S, Llorente-Ayuso L, Contador I, evolocumab. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377 (20): 633-643.
Bermejo-Pareja F. Versiones en español del Minimental
State Examination (MMSE). Cuestiones para su uso en
la práctica clínica. [Spanish versions of the Mini-Mental Funding/support: No funds were available
State Examination (MMSE). Questions for use in clinical for this study.
practice]. Rev Neurol 2015; 61 (8): 363-371. Conflict of interests: The author declares that
15. Robinson JG, Nedergaard BS, Rogers WJ, Fialkow J,
Neutel JM, Ramstad D et al. Effect of evolocumab
there is no conflict of interest.
or ezetimibe added to moderate- or high-intensity Data availability: The datasets during
statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with and/or analyzed during the current study
hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized available from the corresponding author on
clinical trial. JAMA. 2014; 311 (18): 1870-1882.
16. Ts u y u k i R T, B u n g a r d T J. Po o r a d h e r e n c e
reasonable request.
with hypolipidemic drugs: a lost opportunity.
Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 21 (5): 576-582. Correspondence:
17. Koren MJ, Lundqvist P, Bolognese M, Neutel JM, Edgar Gustavo Ramos-Martínez
Monsalvo ML, Yang J et al. Anti-PCSK9 monotherapy E-mail: edgargus2@gmail.com