Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Reseña
El experto en desarrollo organizacional Edgar H. Schein, quien tiene medio siglo de
experiencia como consultor, comparte sus saberes para enseñarle a desarrollar la
importante práctica de preguntar con humildad. Aunque el texto puede parecer al principio
un tanto reiterativo sobre ciertas ideas, a medida que la lectura avanza, dichas nociones
se van revelando con mayor detalle y profundidad. Mediante una exposición clara y
amena, apoyada en nociones de los negocios, la sociología y la psicología, así como en
ejemplos y ejercicios, Schein guía al lector de manera didáctica en el aprendizaje del arte
de plantear preguntas con humildad. getAbstract recomienda esta útil obra a las personas
en posiciones de liderazgo, a los ejecutivos de todo nivel y a quien desee comunicarse
mejor y generar relaciones más sanas y efectivas tanto en su entorno profesional como
personal.
Ideas fundamentales
En el mundo actual, cada vez más interconectado, interdependiente y diverso,
establecer una comunicación eficaz resulta de enorme valía.
Dicha comunicación debe promover la comprensión entre actores variados, y debe
fundarse en el respeto, la confianza y el reconocimiento de los otros.
Es importante aprender a estructurar preguntas más eficaces que nos permitan
comunicarnos mejor, lo que promueve mejores relaciones tanto en lo personal
como en lo organizacional.
Una comunicación exitosa reconoce que las personas pueden ser las depositarias
de saberes que pueden ayudarnos a realizar o mejorar una tarea. Ello requiere
humildad.
Preguntar con humildad permite lograr la apertura entre interlocutores y se basa
en la curiosidad y en el interés por la otra persona.
Para generar un clima adecuado para practicar el preguntar con humildad, evite
las afirmaciones dogmáticas, practique la escucha y el agradecimiento.
Hay tres modelos de humildad según el estatus: básica, optativa y “aquí y ahora”.
Para preguntar con humildad, puede optar por un enfoque colectivo inclusivo en
términos de “nosotros” en vez de “usted o yo”.
A diferencia de otros tipos de interrogantes, la pregunta humilde no pretende
establecer un control sobre la comunicación.
La pregunta humilde se basa en el aquí y ahora.
Resumen
La importancia de preguntar con humildad
En la actualidad, vivimos en un mundo cada vez más complejo, interconectado,
interdependiente y diverso, donde interactuar con personas de otras actividades
profesionales, distintas ocupaciones y variadas nacionalidades y culturas es cada vez
más frecuente. Por ello, es crucial establecer una comunicación confiable y eficaz, basada
en la construcción de buenas relaciones, entre los diversos actores de una situación, en
especial entre los miembros de distintos niveles jerárquicos.
“Debemos mejorar nuestra capacidad de preguntar y afirmar menos cosas dentro de una
cultura que sobrevalora las afirmaciones dogmáticas””.
Esta comunicación debe permitir y facilitar la comprensión mutua, con base en el respeto
y en la aceptación de que los demás pueden tener conocimientos o información que
podríamos aprender para hacer una tarea o para hacerla de mejor manera. A fin de
generar relaciones positivas y organizaciones efectivas, es fundamental aprender a
estructurar y comunicar preguntas más eficaces. Dado que no todas las preguntas son
iguales ni equivalentes, puede poner en práctica una manera concreta de plantear
preguntas, llamada “la pregunta humilde”, que se define como “el arte sutil de conseguir
que otros se abran, que formulen preguntas cuya respuesta usted no conoce, de forjar
una relación basada en la curiosidad y en el interés por la otra persona”.
“Lo que optamos por preguntar, cuándo lo hacemos, cuál es nuestra actitud subyacente
cuando lo hacemos, son elementos clave para crear relaciones, para la comunicación y
para la realización de tareas”.
Aprender a plantear preguntas humildes ayuda mejorar el frecuente patrón de
comportamiento en el que, debido a unos métodos de comunicación deficiente y la falta
de relaciones sólidas basadas en el respeto y la confianza, muchas veces los empleados
subalternos prefieren asumir opciones arriesgadas con tal de no molestar a sus
superiores con noticias potencialmente negativas. Se debe generar un ambiente de
confianza y respeto, y los líderes de los niveles altos deben aprender a plantear preguntas
humildes. Con ello, propiciarán una comunicación efectiva y bidireccional entre los actores
de los diversos niveles jerárquicos o que participan en una situación dada.Hay que
plantearse cómo crear un clima en el que los individuos expresen sus opiniones, brinden
información e incluso corrijan a quienes ocupan puestos más altos cuando estos estén a
punto de equivocarse. La respuesta radica en aprender a realizar menos afirmaciones que
resulten dogmáticas y a desarrollar nuestra capacidad de plantear preguntas adecuadas,
de la manera adecuada. Aprender a escuchar antes de hablar y agradecer la respuesta,
es primordial. Las preguntas han de abrir el canal de información antes de brindar
recomendaciones o consejos.
Decir y preguntar
Hay diferencias importantes entre asumir una de dos de actitudes: decir y preguntar. Al
decir algo se posiciona al interlocutor en una posición de inferior: se implica de antemano
que no sabe algo que debería de saber. Cuando se pregunta, los roles cambian
temporalmente: se asume que uno no posee una información que el interlocutor sí tiene.
Si además de obtener información se desea mejorar la relación entre las partes que
participan en la conversación, es mejor preguntar, hacer la pregunta humilde que expresa
disposición de escuchar al otro y voluntad de aprender de él.
Tres tipos de humildad
Para comprender la pregunta humilde, deben distinguirse tres tipos de humildad, que se
clasifican según el estatus:
1. “Humildad básica” – Las culturas establecen diversas normas respecto al estatus
de las personas, ya sea por su edad, posición social heredada al nacimiento o
méritos, entre otros modelos. Mas, por lo común, todos reconocemos que, en tanto
“seres humanos, nos debemos cierto respeto básico y debemos actuar con cierto
grado de cortesía”.
2. “Humildad optativa” – Al estar ante la presencia de personas cuyos éxitos
admiramos y/o que son socialmente reconocidos, podemos experimentar
humildad. Esta es optativa pues podemos elegir estar o no en presencia de dichas
de personas. La cultura ocupacional puede definir los protocolos o las conductas
adecuadas para expresar respeto en tales circunstancias.
3. “Humildad aquí y ahora” – Es el tipo de humildad clave para comprender la
naturaleza de la pregunta humilde. Es la que se experimenta al saber que se
depende temporalmente de alguien porque dicha persona sabe algo que uno
requiere para poder realizar algo o lograr un objetivo. En este caso también se
puede elegir, pues se tiene la opción de evitar dicha interdependencia temporal;
sin embargo, en consecuencia, no se aprendería lo que se desea saber. Esta
forma de humildad no se fundamenta en el estatus de los participantes, sino en el
reconocimiento de que hay una interdependencia entre las partes en ese momento
preciso.
“Es triste que a menudo las personas prefieran fracasar a admitir su dependencia de
otros””.
En el trabajo en equipo, es muy importante que el líder o la persona en la posición
jerárquica alta practique la pregunta humilde con sus subordinados, y que estos también
practiquen la “humildad aquí y ahora”. Así se fortalecen las relaciones de equipo entre
jefes y subordinados y se promueve un flujo efectivo de información en momentos clave.
Este ejercicio implica que, en ciertas circunstancias y según el contexto, usted se sienta
cómodo incluso planteando preguntas humildes, como “¿Lo estoy haciendo
correctamente? Díganme si hago algo mal”, sin avergonzarse.
El arte y la ciencia de preguntar
La manera, el contenido, el lugar y las circunstancias influyen en el éxito de plantear una
pregunta de manera efectiva. La pregunta humilde va más allá de hacer una pregunta
directa, y debe transmitir tanto curiosidad como interés, así como el deseo de una forma
de comunicación más abierta. Es importante discernir entre una pregunta humilde, que
implica y demuestra interés, curiosidad y respeto, y otro tipo de preguntas. La diferencia
radica en la intención y el sentimiento al momento de preguntar. Hay que tener cuidado de
no plantear “preguntas directivas, retóricas, vergonzantes o las afirmaciones con forma de
pregunta”. Asimismo, hay que tomar en cuenta la situación, los actores y el contexto, y
actuar de manera sensible en función de ellos.
“A veces, una pregunta abierta formulada en el momento oportuno es todo lo que hace
falta para iniciar la resolución efectiva de problemas””.
La pregunta humilde como una forma de cultura comunicativa también puede dar pie a un
proceso de cambio para la mejoría y el crecimiento de los involucrados. Para practicar el
preguntar con humildad, inspírese en la humildad que le causan las personas que usted
respeta y admira, así como en la manera en que usted depende de los demás, en un
proceso de mutua ayuda.
“La pregunta humilde, por definición, es más personal, porque se centra en manifestar
curiosidad por la otra persona e interesarse en ella, pero la elección del tema puede
centrarse en ámbitos que van desde lo laboral hasta lo más íntimo””.
Mediante el ejercicio de poner atención y ser sensible a las situaciones y las interacciones
que se presenten en su vida cotidiana, identifique cuando se presentan oportunidades
para mejorarlas y cómo puede usar una pregunta humilde para obtener el apoyo de sus
subordinados. La pregunta humilde puede ayudarle a plantear preguntas difíciles y a
lograr que su equipo de trabajo se comprometa mediante la motivación de sus miembros,
al saberse valiosos y reconocidos.
“Las preguntas antagónicas pueden ser humildes si el motivo que tiene usted al
formularlas es ser útil, y si la relación ya ha creado la confianza suficiente como para
permitir que el preguntar con humildad otro se sienta ayudado en vez de cuestionado””.
Entre otras técnicas que puede aplicar para preguntar de manera humilde, puede
“explorar el nosotros en vez de optar por una actitud ’usted o yo’”; formular preguntas
abiertas que requieran más que un sí o no como respuesta; pedir ejemplos; dilucidar
antes de preguntar cuál es la información que usted requiere y qué tipo de planteamiento
puede ayudar a que la obtenga. Cuando esté en grupo, es importante fijar normas de
mutuo acuerdo para la dinámica del intercambio comunicativo y cuidar de escuchar cada
participante. El moderador debe recordar que le toca “controlar el proceso, no el
contenido”. Dado que preguntar con humildad y responder de la misma manera implica un
proceso relacional, cuando usted está en la posición de responder, primero asegúrese de
comprender plenamente lo que se le pregunta y no dé por sentado que quien plantea la
interrogante ha formulado la pregunta correcta para lo que esa persona quiere saber.
Maneras de preguntar
La pregunta humilde se diferencia de otras maneras de interrogación en que no pretende
controlar el flujo de la comunicación más allá de lo que se desea, en una situación
específica. Al reflexionar cómo se puede ser útil a los demás, es posible distinguir estas
cuatro maneras de interrogar:
1. “La pregunta humilde” – Al potenciar la curiosidad y el interés por el otro con
respeto, los prejuicios y las ideas preconcebidas se minimizan. Hay un ambiente
de reconocimiento. “La pregunta humilde no influencia ni el contenido (…) ni la
forma en que lo dice”.
2. “La pregunta diagnóstica”– A diferencia de la pregunta humilde, la pregunta
diagnóstica solo se concentra en aquello por lo que siente curiosidad en concreto.
Esto “influye en el proceso mental” de su interlocutor y puede subdividirse diversos
tipos de preguntas, por ejemplo en “sentimientos y reacciones”, en “causas y
motivos”, en “la acción” y en “preguntas sistémicas” que interrogan sobre la
situación en general.
3. “La pregunta antagónica” – Usted introduce sus ideas a manera de pregunta y,
en consecuencia, quien plantea la pregunta está asumiendo el control del proceso
conversacional y de su contenido. Si, más que preguntar, se está aconsejando, es
posible provocar una resistencia en el interlocutor. Estas preguntas incluyen las
mismas subcategorías temáticas que las del punto anterior. Pero una pregunta
antagónica puede ser humilde si su fin es el de ser útil, considerando que haya
suficiente confianza y el contexto adecuado.
4. “La pregunta orientada al proceso” – La conversación se centra en sí misma y
la pregunta se sitúa en el aquí y ahora, en lugar de seguir el flujo de la
conversación. La humildad de la pregunta depende “de los motivos [de quien] sitúe
el foco en la conversación”. Una pregunta orientada al proceso puede mostrar
cualquiera de las tres características: humilde, diagnóstica o antagónica.
Retos culturales
La cultura puede ser el inhibidor principal de la pregunta humilde. La cultura
estadounidense está muy orientada al pragmatismo, al individualismo y al éxito como
medida de estatus. Aunque estas son solo algunas características y las cosas están
cambiando, existe cierta tendencia a valorar más alcanzar objetivos que forjar relaciones.
Esto puede contraponerse en situaciones de trabajo intercultural en las que se debe
colaborar con miembros de culturas para las cuales las relaciones y la confianza tienen
una importancia intrínseca. Otro reto a tener en cuenta es la valoración que se da a la
noción de tener la razón y de tener el conocimiento. Esto puede traducirse en
afirmaciones que tienen como fin aventajar a los demás. Al preguntar y también al
responder, la información que fluya ha de ser relevante y adecuada al contexto y a los
intereses de los interlocutores. Antes de dar un consejo, piense y considere a su
interlocutor. En un mundo cada vez más diverso, interdependiente e interconectado
resulta más necesario, y a la vez, más complejo, establecer relaciones para conseguir
objetivos. La pregunta humilde, que se basa en el aquí y ahora, es una herramienta de la
mayor utilidad.
Roles, personalización e innovación
En especial los líderes deben aumentar su capacidad de plantear preguntas con
humildad. Una herramienta útil es poner atención al tipo “de relaciones de rol” de una
situación y a la posición de estatus que usted tiene respecto de las personas con las que
interactúa. Es fundamental reconocer que su interlocutor es una persona, no solo el
representante o actor de un rol social. A este proceso de reconocimiento se le llama
“personalización”. Aunque la pregunta humilde es personalizada, tenga en cuenta que “lo
que se considera personal queda determinado por las normas que se desprenden de las
historias organizacionales, las culturas ocupacionales y las nacionales”.
“Los ingredientes que suelen faltar en la mayoría de conversaciones son la curiosidad y la
disposición para formular preguntas cuya respuesta aún no conocemos””.
Lo mismo aplica para la noción de confianza, así como para la permisibilidad de los
tópicos sobre los que se puede hablar o no, según el contexto y los interlocutores. Tenga
en cuenta estos elementos contextuales para practicar de manera efectiva y exitosa la
pregunta humilde. Puede apoyarse en el uso de un “lenguaje normal basado en una
cultura común”, y reflexionar sobre sus propios prejuicios y su conducta tras un evento
comunicativo. Pregúntese cómo mejorar y aprender sobre otras culturas (organizativa,
social, nacional). Pregunte antes de afirmar o actuar. Use sus capacidades imaginativas y
creativas e innove en las situaciones que pueden mejorarse. Genere “islas culturales” con
sus interlocutores, en las que la confianza, la apertura y el reconocimiento generen
cohesión, y lidere practicando el arte de preguntar con humildad.
Sobre el autor
Edgar H. Schein es profesor emérito del MIT Sloan School of Management, experto en
desarrollo organizacional y autor, entre varios otros libros, de Organizational Culture and
Leadership y Process Consultation Revisited: Building the Helping Relationship.
HUMILDAD – Edgar H. Schein – Humble Inquiry The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of
Telling – INGLES
Editorial Rating
8
Recommendation
Retired MIT professor Edgar H. Schein makes a solid case for humility. He explores the
way American culture prioritizes action, practicality and competition over courteousness
and respect. Schein encourages openness and curiosity about others in the form of
“Humble Inquiry” – “the fine art of drawing someone out, of asking questions to which you
do not already know the answer, of building a relationship based on curiosity and interest
in the other person.” To counter a working environment often short of manners and
civility, getAbstract recommends this slim but powerful book to executives, managers,
leaders and anyone who wants to know how to ask a polite question and who really wants
to know the answer.
Take-Aways
“Humble Inquiry” means “asking questions to which you do not already know the
answer” and “building a relationship based on...interest in the other person.”
American culture focuses on “Telling” instead of “Asking.”
When you tell instead of ask, you can offend or demean others.
Asking builds better relationships because you put others’ needs before your own.
Use “diagnostic inquiry” to ask clarifying questions to find out feelings, reactions,
causes, motives, future actions and the big picture.
“Confrontational inquiry” means telling people what to do or giving advice while
phrasing it as a question.
“Process-oriented inquiry” focuses on the inquiry itself.
Problems arise when boundaries change, such as when “task-oriented”
relationships become personal.
Barriers to humble inquiry include status, rank, role and internal psychological
makeup.
Practice humility by slowing down, becoming more mindful, developing greater
awareness of your surroundings and asking questions.
Summary
“Humble Inquiry”
American culture encourages “Telling” instead of “Asking.” But telling hinders relationships,
because when you tell people what to do, you assume they’re incompetent or lack
information and that you’re the expert. “Asking” fosters better relationships. When you ask
people for their input, you humble yourself and empower them. This nourishes long-term,
productive interactions.
“Humble inquiry is the fine art of drawing someone out, of asking questions to which you
do not already know the answer, of building a relationship based on curiosity and interest
in the other person.”
When you ask instead of tell, your partner can lead the conversation, and that builds trust.
If you hear something you didn’t know or even something you didn’t want to know, you’ve
still learned from the exchange. Telling shuts down communication. People hurrying
through the workday do ask questions, but often their questions are biased toward action
and are not humble inquiries.
“The culture of ‘Do and Tell’ does not teach us how to change pace, decelerate, take stock
of what we are doing, observe ourselves and others, try new behaviors [and] build new
relationships.”
Humility comes in three forms: “basic, optional and here-and-now.” Across all cultures,
humiliating another person – causing someone to lose face – is a social offense. Avoiding
it means practicing basic humility. Certain cultures have class systems or hierarchies;
people born into a particular status level never lose that status. Members of upper classes
enjoy higher rank and different treatment than members of lower classes. Even within such
systems, people treat each other with a minimum, basic level of respect and civility.
“Life in civilized society is reciprocal, and we all learn the rules of the culture in which we
grow up of when and how to reciprocate.”
Optional humility occurs in cultures where people earn prestige rather than being granted it
as a birthright. When someone’s achievements might humble those who observe them, the
observers can choose to be admiring or disdainful, making their humility “optional,”
because they have choices about how they react.
“A low-key question along the lines of ‘How do each of you feel about the direction we are
going in?’ produces far better decisions than motions, seconds and votes.”
Humble inquiry is a part of “here-and-now humility.” If someone has something you need,
you can humble yourself and ask for help, or you can refuse to ask and not get what you
need. Here-and-now humility can be difficult to perceive during peer interactions in which
everyone shares equal status. Consider an operating room. If everyone treats doctors as
deities, patients suffer. People of high status find it challenging to “become here-and-now
humble,” because that means recognizing that, at certain times, they are “dependent on
subordinates and other lower-status team members.”
More Forms of Inquiry
Other forms of questioning include “diagnostic inquiry, confrontational inquiry and process-
oriented inquiry.” For inquiry to be truly humble, it must be genuine. When you ask a
question, don’t promote your agenda. “Try to minimize your own preconceptions, clear
your mind at the beginning of a conversation and maximize your listening as the
conversation proceeds.” Good starting phrases for a humble inquiry include: “What’s
happening?”, “What brings you here?” and “Can you give me an example?”
“Questioning is both a science and an art.”
Diagnostic questions examine “feelings and reactions” or “causes and motives.” Asking
how people feel or how they’re reacting to a situation could push their boundaries; they
might consider such questions intrusive. In fact, depending on the context, diagnostic
questions may or may not be humble inquiries. Diagnostic inquiry calls for asking several
types of questions, including:
“Clarifying” – These queries involve “steering the conversation and influencing the
other person’s mental process.”
“Cause and motive” – Such questions probe for actions and their consequences,
for instance, “What may have caused this?” and “Why do you suppose this
happened?”
“Action-oriented” – These inquiries focus on past or future plans of action. They
could include, “How did you get here?” and “What have you tried so far?”
“Systemic” – These inquiries help you assemble your “understanding of the total
situation” and give you a picture of other people’s thoughts, actions and feelings.
Examples include, “How do you think she felt when you did that?” and “What do
you think he will do if you follow through?”
“Even ordinary conversation is a complex dance involving moment-to-moment decisions
on what to say, how to say it and how to respond to what the other says.”
Confrontational questions relay your ideas in question form and they are rarely humble
inquiries. When you give advice phrased as a question, people feel defensive. Listeners
can tell whether you care about them or if you are just trying to insert your own views.
Process-oriented inquiry is the most difficult and potentially most rewarding kind of
questioning. It shifts the focus of your probing onto the inquiry itself. Such inquiries can be
humble, diagnostic or confrontational. For example, you might humbly ask, “Is this too
personal?” or “Have we gone too far” instead of confronting your counterpart with, “Why
were you so defensive just now?” or “Are you upset?” Despite potentially being awkward,
process-oriented inquiries allow both parties to readjust their expectations. Humble inquiry
takes time and practice.
“Doing and Telling”
Western culture’s preference for doing and telling is the “main inhibitor” of humble inquiry.
Society in the United States is based on the individual. This mind-set considers each
person’s rights and freedoms more important than those of a group or society at large.
Americans and many other Westerners are practical, action-oriented and individualistic;
they value getting the job done over building relationships. Here-and-now humility is hard
to achieve in societies so fragmented by rank and status. American society doesn’t readily
acknowledge an individual’s dependence on others.
“The social art of asking a question has been strangely neglected.”
Americans are competitive and want to win; US politicians and salespeople build
relationships with their constituents and consumers, but only as a means to an end.
Americans become impatient doing business with cultures that value relationships more
than productivity. They don’t want to sit through get-to-know-you dinners before getting
down to brass tacks. In the US, “status and prestige are gained by task accomplishment,
and once you are above someone else, you are licensed to tell them what to do.” This
causes problems when high achievers are unwilling to listen or learn from lower-status
individuals.
“Timing, tone of voice, and various other cues tell the listener about your motives.”
Americans value telling more than asking because requesting help or clarification denotes
weakness. You’re supposed to know what you’re doing, especially if you manage or lead
others. Stephen Potter, author of Gamesmanship, said in the 1950s that Western cultures
live in a state of “gamesmanship” or “one-upmanship.” He believed that Americans keep
score by “making a smart remark, putting down someone who has claimed too much and
turning a clever phrase, even if it embarrasses someone else in the conversation.”
Consider the pre-election presidential debates. Observers became more concerned with
who “won” the debate than with the issues the candidates discussed. Americans
fundamentally believe life is a competition with clear winners and losers. They have little
patience with listening to information they think they already know.
“In the telling mode, we hope to educate, to impress, to score points, to entertain; when
we are in listening mode, we want to be educated, impressed and entertained.”
The culture of the US is changing as people realize that the world is becoming more
complex and interdependent. Americans across a range of occupations – airline pilots and
their crews, surgical teams, sports teams, conductors and their orchestras, and others –
see how much they rely on their team members. People who trust each other work well
together, but first they must slow down and take the time to build the critical foundation of
trust.
Barriers to Humble Inquiry
Status, rank, role and internal psychological makeup inhibit humble inquiry. Subordinates
and superiors follow their own codes of conduct. Subordinates generally obey “rules of
deference” that govern how they act in front of their superiors, while superiors generally
obey “rules of demeanor” or appropriate rules of behavior in front of their subordinates.
People notice when someone fails to follow these unwritten rules, such as when a boss
publicly berates an employee.
“Confrontational questions can be humble if your motive is to be helpful and if the
relationship has enough trust built up to allow the other to feel helped rather than
confronted.”
Your role and status determine how you relate to others. Meeting your friend for dinner is a
different experience than going to the doctor or buying a new dress. Relationships can be
“task-oriented,” and revolve around transactions that happen when you need something
from someone. Or, relationships can be person-oriented, when you like each other or
share the same interests. Problems arise when boundaries change, such as when task-
based relationships become personal.
“In a relationship-building process, the most difficult issue is how far to go in revealing
something that normally we would conceal, knowing at the same time that unless we open
up more, we can not build the relationship.”
Researcher Amy Edmondson investigated how cardiac surgical teams work together on
open-heart surgery. At lunch, many teams segregate, with professional peers sitting
according to rank and status. One successful team’s members sat only with each other.
This team performed more complex surgical procedures because everyone learned
together as a team and eliminated barriers. Melissa Valentine conducted similar research
in emergency rooms. To reduce patient wait times, one ER created small “pods,” each with
an available doctor, nurse and technician. By rotating through the pods, each professional
came to know their colleagues personally. Some hospitals “refused the pod system
because it would force more closeness than the staff was ready for.”
“It takes...discipline and practice to access one’s ignorance, to stay focused on the other
person.”
Joe Luft and Harry Ingham created the concept of the Johari window – a grid of the “four
parts” of the “socio-psychological self” – to explain internal psychological forces which can
impede humble inquiry. Some things are known “only to self,” while some are known “only
to others.” Certain safe topics, like the weather, are part of the “open self.” However,
people unknowingly send signals showing “blind self,” including body language, tone of
voice, figures of speech, dress and behavior. Your “concealed self” harbors potentially
embarrassing personal information you’re aware of but “are not supposed to reveal
because it might offend or hurt others.” The “unknown self” refers to hidden talents,
thoughts and feelings that others don’t know about you and you don’t yet know either.
“The ORJI Cycle”
Human behavior follows the ORJI cycle:
“Observe” – Observation is an active process involving all your senses and
cognitive processes. Humans are prone to focus their “defense mechanisms of
denial” on things they don’t want to see. They also use “projection” and interpret
matters according to what they do want to see. Many people deny their feelings or
suppress them, an impulse that a task-oriented culture reinforces. This is the most
critical step in the cycle. Careful observation lets people show humility by slowing
down and encouraging questions.
“React emotionally” – Reactions are based on observations and sometimes kick
in before someone mentally processes an observation.
“Make judgments” – People reach conclusions by processing and analyzing data.
“Intervene” – This means behaving “overtly in order to make something happen.”
Intervention, whether rash or considered, occurs when people act on their
judgments.
Learning Humility
You can learn to be humble. Practicing humble-inquiry skills will help you in your personal
life and at work, especially if you’re a manager or executive. Leaders must acknowledge
their subordinates in order to communicate and establish trust. Expand your “perception
and insight” to “identify when and where you might do less telling and more asking.” You
will find yourself battling the anxieties of learning and unlearning: Learning new skills is
difficult and may provoke anxiety. Unlearning bad habits and developing good ones is
often even harder.
“Sometimes we don’t want to build a positive relationship; we want to be one up and win.”
Slow down and change tempo. Develop greater awareness of your surroundings. Learn to
value personal relationships over task management. Reach out to others. For example,
invite your work colleagues to lunch to get to know them better. Use humble inquiry on
yourself. Ask: “What is going on here? What would be the appropriate thing to do? What
am I thinking and feeling and wanting?” Consider whom you depend on and who depends
on you. Practice mindfulness. Learning a new skill – drawing, painting, acting or the like –
will humble you and broaden your horizons. Experiencing a new culture through travel
polishes your humble-inquiry skills.
In the workplace, recognize the presence or absence of humble inquiry. Bring team
members together with informal activities. One Swiss-German company had its executives
participate in arcane sports no one knew – like shooting a crossbow – to bring people
together regardless of different ranks.
About the Author
Professor Edgar H. Schein retired from the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is the
author of several books, including Helping and The Corporate Culture Survival Guide.
Recommendation
In a world characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity, versatile
leadership makes more sense than the shopworn model of lofty corporate “heroes and
disruptors” who are supposedly invincible. Edgar H. Schein, a management scholar, and
his son Peter A. Schein, an expert on organizations, explain how to achieve cultural
change through “humble leadership.” The theme picks up on their previous books, Humble
Consulting and Humble Inquiry. Their guidance will be especially useful to coaches,
mentors and HR officials who work on leadership development.
Take-Aways
The four levels of leadership are 1) “Level Minus 1, inhumane”; 2) “Level 1,
impersonal”; 3) “Level 2, totally humane”; and 4) “Level 3, bonded.”
Level 2 calls for “humble leadership,” which is open, personal, engaging and
trusting.
Humble leaders see every individual as valuable.
This leadership approach thrives in a transparent corporate culture with robust
workforce relationships.
Humble leadership is collaborative.
It has nothing to do with “vertical hierarchy” or the “heroic performance” of
designated leaders.
Humble leaders build strong relationships and understand group dynamics.
Every relationship, including managerial relationships, relies on aligned mutual
expectations.
An archaic, authoritarian and punitive management culture can easily
overwhelm humble leaders.
Their goal should be to transform their corporate culture to make Level 2
leadership accepted, expected and sustainable.
Summary
“Humble Leadership”
In organizations that run on cutthroat competitiveness, employees often regard their
leaders as “heroic” superstars who brilliantly meet their challenges. But companies don’t
gain from positioning their leaders as masters of the hierarchy and designated heroes.
“Leadership exists in all corners and levels of all organizations.”
Instead, they should turn to a different model: Collaborative, cooperative, group-
oriented and relationship-based “humble leadership.” This contemporary leadership tactic
“hinges on open and trusting relationships” within groups. Its hallmarks – candor, trust
and openness – become the welcome, defining characteristics of humble leaders’
corporate cultures. In dismal contrast, many traditional organizations carry the burden
of role-based, authoritative, disciplinary and transactional leadership marred by a lack of
trust or openness.
“We have to think…more broadly about the future of work itself, to consider how our
concepts of Level 2 relationships and humble leadership will prove to be necessary for
sustained effectiveness.”
Smart organizations are no longer hierarchal. They know worthwhile leaders can emerge
from any tier in a company. Depending on their circumstances, talents and capabilities,
everyday people can and do step up and lead, often contributing substantial knowledge
and expertise.
The Leaders’ “Relationship Continuum”
Leadership generally means getting other people to join you in taking on “new and better”
challenges. Leaders operate at four different levels of relationship representing common
societal norms. Organizationally, the relationship continuum includes:
1. “Level Minus 1” leadership – This oppressive leadership style relies on
intimidation, domination and power. It doesn’t recognize people’s common
humanity. Think of prisoners and their guards or sweatshop bosses and
their workers.
2. “Level 1” leadership – This transactional, arms-length, machine-like,
impersonal style relies on the designated roles and rules of the “basic managerial
culture.” Examples include traditional bosses and their team members. Sometimes,
Level 1 leaders try to masquerade as Level 2 leaders, but they seldom can
perpetuate this fraud for long. People sense their lack of authenticity. Striving to
remain relevant, but increasingly unable to do so, Level 1 leadership devolves to
individual competencies. It views employees as expendable “human resources.”
3. “Level 2” leadership – In contrast, leaders at this level recognize employees as
individuals. They know everyone is valuable. They practice personalized, trusting
humble leadership, which is collaborative and cooperative. Level 2 doesn’t rely on
hierarchical roles. It replaces subordination with collaboration. Examples include
close colleagues on corporate teams. Level 2 leadership isn’t for executives
only. Today, doctors, teachers and other professionals are learning that
friendly, personal relationships with their colleagues and those they serve are more
effective and enduring than formal, distant ones.
4. “Level 3” leadership – People experience this elevated “bonded” leadership in
their closest relationships. Examples include loving couples or intense work
groups, such as teams of US Navy Seals. Great teams operate at Level 3, since
Levels 1 and 2 can’t nourish the necessary caliber of performance. Executives
often assume that Level 3 leadership will foment problems in ongoing business
operations.
“Individual Competencies” Within Group Dynamics
Calm, steady, humble leadership aligns and attunes to the chaotic circumstances of the
modern world more effectively than ossified impersonal leadership. Humble leadership,
which relies on group dynamics, is sensible and natural. People welcome it and adapt to
it easily.
“Leadership always refers to some task that can be improved and to some group whose
values and culture will ultimately determine what is better.”
Humble leaders know that group dynamics outweigh rugged individualism in today’s
workforce. They show particular expertise at group dynamics and “group
sensemaking.” Group interaction frequently calls on the skills that define humble leaders,
such as understanding when to step into a situation by defining the context, checking for a
consensus, laying out plans or making decisions. The group environment is also conducive
for “setting goals, asking for ideas, brainstorming” and “building systemic understanding.”
“I See You”
A Level 2 leader recognizes other people’s “total presence” – which is not to say that he or
she wants to be your friend or hang out socially. Instead, these leaders
understand that you are both engaged in a mutual business relationship. They are aware
of the individuality of the people they lead, attuned to their humanity and conscious of how
much the firm depends on them.
“Even, or especially, in the US military, the old model – organizations as machines led by
heroes – is the past, not the future.”
For example, the CEO of a giant, international chemical conglomerate works on an
intimate daily basis with 11 trusted division heads and other managers. The CEO made
these 11 advisers jointly responsible for the firm’s financial and operational health and
overall performance. The CEO and this team share responsibility for the firm’s future – not
the CEO alone.
“Hierarchy is a structural characteristic of organizational life, but what actually goes on
between someone higher and someone lower is not automatically prescribed.”
These 12 executives meet regularly to plot strategy. Every three years, the advisers switch
responsibilities. Each person moves to a different division, so over time they all develop a
thorough understanding of the business. This prevents them from becoming insular, close-
minded champions of any one department. Their joint accountability promotes honest
dialogue and stress-free group decisions. During meetings, everyone speaks openly. They
also retain group-oriented process consultants who help them work together effectively.
“It is possible to have a closer, more open and trusting relationship in the work situation
while being quite sensitive to boundaries of privacy and propriety.”
This novel working arrangement exemplifies the invigorating Level 2 changes now
underway within many organizations. Companies often undertake these changes
experimentally to test new methods. Leaders’ strong personal relationships with their
employees become a unifying element in these new arrangements.
Moving from Level 1 To Level 2
Most people understand how to create Level 2 relationships with their friends and
relatives. Transforming Level 1 relationships into Level 2 relationships takes work.
New Level 2 leaders will need personal and professional development to help bring
about this change. They should:
Read and reflect – Study group processes and the “dynamics of complex
systems.”
Learn to design “work relationships” – Assess your workplace networks and
relationships. Remember that relationships are always interactive. Create a
“relationship map” with yourself in the center. Place the names of the people in
your work and personal life above your name, beside or below your name to
indicate how much they expect of you. Vary the thickness of the lines connecting
each person to you to indicate your “degree of mutually perceived connection.” For
example, the line to your family would be quite thick. The line to your CEO
might be a thread. This map, which provides a clear overview of your level of
personal connection with the people in your workforce, can guide you in connecting
to and interacting with them.
Develop your “behavioral skills” – Conversations build relationships. To achieve
Level 2 communication, ask questions that are a bit more personal than normal,
but stay aware of the boundaries of cultural norms. Both parties can mutually
reveal a little more about themselves. Make eye contact and listen well. The
process of building the skills required for closer professional relationships doesn’t
follow a set formula. If you know your intuition is reliable, trust your instincts.
“Instead of heading into work wondering how you alone can solve the problem, what if you
went to work committed to sorting it out with a partner [or] team?”
A strong relationship relies on “some symmetry in mutual expectations,” that is, you can
reliably predict how the other party will behave. This knowledge drives trust. Humble
leadership depends on “personization,” which means basing a relationship on a person’s
humanity, not on his or her assigned role. It involves sharing personal information in an
honest, interactive way. The challenge is establishing how much personization works for
both parties.
A New Model for Leadership
Today’s challenges require Level 2 leadership because:
1. Tasks are getting harder “exponentially” – Organizational activities and tasks
are growing more convoluted and perplexing. Businesses face the challenges of
booming technology and increasing diversity.
2. “Managerial culture is myopic” and “often self-defeating” – Engineering
advances, technological breakthroughs and automation eliminate most production
errors. Yet quality and safety issues confound manufacturers due to management
deficiencies emerging from outmoded leadership structures. Humble leadership
can fix these problems.
3. “Generational changes” reshape “social and work values” – Younger
employees want their firms to be purposeful and socially and
environmentally responsible. They want their jobs to have meaning. Conventional
managers usually don’t care about these dynamics, but humble leaders recognize
their importance.
“The Soft Stuff”
Soft skills carry little or no weight in Level 1 top-down cultures, but are essential to Level
2 leadership. To illustrate the Level 1 leader’s lack of soft skills, consider the typical
hierarchy-based meeting – often the bane of business life. Efficiently run meetings should
work like machines: They start and finish on time. They stick closely to agendas.
Designated individuals organize and run them. They often involve the “judicious if not
brutal assignment of action items and deliverables.”
“Ironically, the single best indicator that…humble leadership can proliferate is that messy
complex problems are becoming more common and the importance of growth is as high
as ever.”
Relentlessly managed meetings embody a corporate hierarchy with no room
for personization. New employees attending these such meetings often wonder why
they’re attending at all, what management expects of them, whether they can speak freely
and if there are hidden agendas.
“Once one has made the transition from Level 1 to Level 2 relationships, the new
environment feels more comfortable, more real and more effective.”
To make business meetings less formal and more productive, apply the soft skills of
humble leadership, especially when new employees are present. Don’t label get-
togethers as “meetings.” Use “informal check-ins” so attendees learn about each other
and the purpose of the gathering without pressures or expectations. Sharing a meal or
snacks represents “breaking bread,” which is the way people have come together
amicably for thousands of years. Don’t designate organizing psychologically safe meetings
to HR or outside consultants; humble leaders perform this task themselves.
The Future of Humble Leadership
As the future organizations evolve, humble leadership will evolve along with them. This
coevolution is likely to unfold along six parameters:
1. “Context over content” – Partly due to the growing importance of artificial
intelligence, “context and process” will matter even more than “content and
expertise.”
2. “Cultural heterogeneity” – Tribalism and its attendant unconscious biases are
growing more dominant in society. Humble leadership must work around
this phenomenon.
3. “Distributed power” – Morally compromised leaders abuse their power. Humble
leadership’s distributed power makes sure that no individual gathers enough power
to be abusive.
4. “Mass customization” – Humble leadership is adaptive. Tailor your leadership
strategies to meet the disparate needs of all your stakeholders, customers and
employees.
5. “Dynamic organizational design” – As mobile online business becomes more
dominant as the way people connect with each other, humble leadership will have
to adjust continually to this new dynamic.
6. “Virtual presence” – Large organizations are increasingly global. To remain
relevant, effective and influential, humble leaders must develop a strong virtual
presence. Employees worldwide need to know that their leader is available to them
when needed and is always ready to address their concerns.
About the Authors
Edgar H. Schein, PhD, is professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology’s Sloan School of Management. His son Peter A. Schein co-founded and is
chief operating officer of the Organizational Culture and Leadership Institute.
HUMILDAD – Edgar H. Schein – Asesorar con humildad Cómo proporcionar
verdadera ayuda más rápido – ESPAÑOL
Clasificación editorial
7
Cualidades
Analítico
Aplicable
Bien estructurado
Reseña
Los asesores ya no pueden operar como antes: asumir el papel de médico corporativo,
diagnosticar los desafíos de la organización y proporcionar prescripciones detalladas. La
asesoría tradicional es inadecuada para el entorno empresarial actual, dice Edgar H.
Schein. Él cree que un nuevo modelo de asesoría es necesario. El “padre de la asesoría
de procesos” pasó 50 años enseñando e investigando la cultura organizacional. Su
modelo de asesoría con humildad ayuda a los consultores a analizar problemas complejos
y ayudar a sus clientes a establecer soluciones pequeñas y productivas. Schein cree que
el cliente y el asesor, sin ser demasiado amigables, deben desarrollar una relación abierta
y de confianza para ser socios eficaces. getAbstract recomienda su manual instructivo y
perspicaz a asesores, consejeros, entrenadores e incluso a padres de familia.
Ideas fundamentales
La asesoría tradicional es inadecuada para los enormes desafíos empresariales
actuales.
La asesoría con humildad no requiere un diagnóstico detallado, una intervención
ambiciosa, soluciones apresuradas o reacciones irreflexivas.
Los asesores humildes entienden los problemas complejos y ayudan a los clientes
a establecer soluciones pequeñas y productivas.
Preguntan a cada cliente: “¿Qué problema trata de resolver?”
Con la asesoría con humildad el cliente y el consultor desarrollan una relación
abierta y de confianza para convertirse en socios eficaces.
El asesor humilde es un ayudante.
El ayudante ilumina la complejidad de la situación e inicia rápidos movimientos de
adaptación para el cliente.
Estas pequeñas intervenciones conducen, de manera secuencial, a otras.
El movimiento adaptativo más efectivo es ayudar al cliente a reconocer
los aspectos confusos del problema y entender que las soluciones convencionales
no ayudarán.
La asesoría con humildad también resulta de utilidad para
entrenadores, consejeros y padres de familia.
Resumen
Problemas organizacionales
Los problemas a los que se enfrentan las organizaciones hoy día son complejos,
ambiguos y confusos. No ceden fácilmente a las soluciones técnicas y a menudo
involucran diferentes tropos culturales, grupos constituyentes, suposiciones, objetivos no
alineados y silos desconectados. Estos problemas son generalmente inestables y
cambian de manera constante. Las compañías a menudo tratan de reunir a las personas
adecuadas para coordinar sus pensamientos y acciones con el fin de arreglar las cosas
rápidamente. Incluso conseguir que estas personas entren en la misma habitación puede
ser difícil, si no imposible. Muchas veces, no pueden comunicarse. Casi siempre estarán
en desacuerdo.
“Los clientes a menudo piensan que saben cómo quieren que se aborde un problema, y
como están pagando por ello, creen que saben lo que el consultor puede y debe hacer
por ellos””.
Los problemas complejos no ceden ante el diagnóstico y la intervención consultiva
estándar. Esta estrategia que hace perder el tiempo a menudo se centra en las cuestiones
equivocadas. La mayoría de los problemas organizativos requieren un nuevo enfoque de
asesoría, coaching y pensamiento: el enfoque es la asesoría con humildad (AH). Se le
llama así porque reconoce la complejidad de los problemas a los que se enfrentan los
clientes, así como la dificultad de avanzar productivamente. El objetivo de la AH es lograr
que el consultor –o “ayudante”– ayude al cliente a lograr algo que no puede lograr por sí
solo. Depende del cliente decidir si el ayudante fue, de hecho, útil.
“La profundidad de una relación es una decisión mutua basada en el nivel de comodidad
al que cada parte llega a través de la interacción””.
Este método de consulta evita las soluciones apresuradas y las reacciones irreflexivas.
Utiliza diagnósticos iniciales, movimientos adaptativos e intervención limitada. Los
movimientos adaptativos son intervenciones pequeñas que conducen secuencialmente a
otras intervenciones pequeñas. Los movimientos adaptativos específicos que un consultor
sugiere dependerán del problema particular del cliente. El movimiento adaptativo más
efectivo es ayudar a los clientes a reconocer los aspectos confusos de su problema,
entender que las soluciones convencionales no les ayudarán, y aceptar que necesitan
“solucionadores de problemas” diferentes y conversaciones frescas.
Respuestas útiles
La asesoría con humildad ofrece respuestas rápidas y útiles a alguna parte de un gran
problema o al gran problema en sí. Los movimientos adaptativos no son herramientas
tradicionales de consulta. Los ayudantes que usan estrategias de AH calculan qué
respuestas iniciales funcionarán mejor. Gracias a la AH, los ayudantes no tienen que
angustiarse de no saber qué hacer en un inicio. Con la AH, el ayudante puede ser
vulnerable. Esta estrategia no es solo para los consultores. Entrenadores, consejeros y
padres de familia pueden usar esta metodología. La asesoría con humildad depende de
que el ayudante construya una relación de confianza con el cliente y elimine su distancia
profesional inicial. Construir una relación cálida y amable, sin ser demasiado amistosa,
ayuda a mostrar al cliente que el ayudante no está a cargo y no tiene la intención de
estarlo.
El primer contacto
En su primer contacto con un cliente, comunique que ha venido a ayudar. No es deseable
enviar un mensaje de que ha llegado para diagnosticar la situación de la empresa y
proponer una solución. Tampoco quiere transmitir un mensaje peor: que pretende
promocionarse a sí mismo, sus ideas y sus habilidades. En vez de eso, pregúntele al
cliente: “¿Qué problema está tratando de resolver?” Exprese humildad en las
interacciones con su cliente. Deje claro que desea trabajar con él para solucionar los
problemas juntos, no para tomar el relevo e imponer su solución. Los principio de la
AH son que el ayudante se preocupa por el cliente, se compromete a ayudarle, siente
curiosidad por saber a qué se enfrenta y está decidido a comprender lo que el cliente
piensa sobre el problema. Para apoyar a sus clientes, ayúdeles a clarificar su compleja
situación actual y comprenderla. Explique que los movimientos rápidos y adaptables
ofrecen las soluciones más efectivas. Este enfoque es más práctico que un diagnóstico
detallado y una intervención multifacética.
Las tres C
La AH no usa una conversación exploratoria o un diagnóstico. En su lugar, participe en
una discusión franca y positiva que fomente una relación fuerte. La gestión de esta
conversación requiere que el consultor tenga la mentalidad que encarna las tres C:
1. Compromiso – Esté preparado emocionalmente para ayudar a los clientes,
quienes sentirán una falta de compromiso.
2. Curiosidad – Sea curioso acerca de quiénes son sus clientes y a qué se
enfrentan. Sus clientes sabrán si usted no está genuinamente interesado en su
problema.
3. Cuidado – Los clientes quieren saber que usted está de su lado. Comunique su
lealtad demostrando su preocupación por ellos como individuos. Comience a
cuidar de sus clientes poniendo atención a lo que dicen y piensan. Preste atención
a la manera en que explican su empresa y sus problemas, y haga caso omiso de
lo que aparece en los folletos y en los materiales de información corporativa que
recibió antes de la reunión. Los clientes se sentirán importantes y honrados de ser
el centro de su atención.
Las relaciones
La asesoría con humildad depende de la creación y el mantenimiento de relaciones de
calidad: un conjunto de expectativas mutuas sobre el comportamiento futuro del otro
basadas en interacciones pasadas. Las personas en una relación comparten una simetría
de expectativas, conocimiento que reconforta a todos los involucrados. Las personas en
una relación también comparten la responsabilidad de mantenerla. Una persona en una
relación puede trabajar duro para mantenerla fuerte, pero si la otra persona no iguala este
esfuerzo, la relación se resiente. En una relación débil, nadie se siente involucrado
emocionalmente. En una relación fuerte, la participación emocional es robusta.
“Estamos enfrentando problemas nuevos y complejos, nuevos tipos de sistemas de
clientes y un nuevo sentido de urgencia en nuestros clientes””.
Las personas mantienen cuatro niveles de relaciones:
1. Nivel Menos Uno – Estas relaciones son hostiles o explotadoras.
2. Nivel Uno – Las emociones desempeñan poco o nada en estas relaciones
impersonales. Todos entienden intuitivamente lo que los demás esperan de ellos:
por ejemplo, “Yo te doy algo; tú dices ‘Gracias’”. Las relaciones de Nivel Uno se
vuelven confusas cuando la gente solicita la ayuda de los llamados “ayudantes
profesionales”, por ejemplo, médicos, abogados, trabajadores sociales y
consejeros. La distancia profesional separa a los ayudantes de las personas que
solicitan su ayuda. Los ayudantes creen que deben reaccionar de manera
impersonal cuando los clientes comparten información personal. Los clientes se
sienten en desventaja y eso inhibe la confianza y la apertura. La mayoría de los
consultores operan en el Nivel Uno con sus clientes. El Nivel Uno puede funcionar
para un consultor que entiende el problema del cliente de inmediato y tiene las
habilidades para solucionarlo.
3. Nivel Dos – El cliente ya no es un “caso”, alguien que el ayudante mantiene a una
distancia profesional. El ayudante trata al cliente como una persona importante, no
como un extraño. A cambio, el cliente se siente cómodo y se abre a aceptar ayuda.
En las relaciones de Nivel Dos, los ayudantes preguntan periódicamente:
“¿Realmente ayuda lo que estamos haciendo?”
4. Nivel Tres – Es un estado avanzado de conexión; el Nivel Tres abarca amistades
cercanas, amor e intimidad. Las preocupaciones éticas hacen que el Nivel Tres
sea inapropiado para el trabajo de consultoría, ya que puede conducir a la
confraternización, el nepotismo y otros comportamientos que son corruptos en un
entorno empresarial. Esta es la constricción que proscribe las relaciones íntimas
entre terapeutas y pacientes o entre colegas en el trabajo.
“Una relación orientada a tareas de Nivel Dos es necesaria para crear suficiente confianza
para que los verdaderos motivos, problemas y preocupaciones del ayudante y del cliente
salgan a la luz””.
En el momento del contacto inicial, el ayudante y el cliente, que por lo general no se
conocen, operan en el Nivel Uno. Si el ayudante dice las cosas incorrectas durante esta
conversación inicial, la relación permanecerá atascada en este nivel. Decir las palabras
correctas puede ser inmediatamente útil y puede ayudar al consultor a desarrollar una
relación positiva y productiva en el Nivel Dos. Los gerentes que se proponen ayudar a sus
jefes, subordinados y compañeros deben salvar la distancia profesional habitual.
Necesitan establecer relaciones de Nivel Dos con sus colegas y consultores.
Escuchar
Los asesores humildes deben ser ávidos oyentes que muestran dos tipos de empatía. En
la Empatía Uno, los ayudantes de AH escuchan atentamente para aprender sobre el
problema del cliente. En la Empatía Dos, siguen escuchando atentamente, pero ahora
tratan de descubrir qué es lo que irrita al cliente sobre su problema. Por ejemplo, el cliente
dice: “Me preocupa el nivel de compromiso de mis empleados. ¿Podría ayudarme a
construir una cultura de compromiso?” En la Empatía Uno, procure entender lo que el
cliente quiere decir con “compromiso” y “cultura”. En la Empatía Dos, pregunte: “¿Por qué
le preocupa esto?”
“Los jefes y subordinados pueden tener que encontrar formas de personalizar sus
relaciones entre ellos para facilitar más confianza y comunicación abierta””.
El ayudante de AH no es distante ni emite dictámenes fríos sobre lo que el cliente debe
hacer. Para lograr una relación de Nivel Dos, el ayudante interactúa con el cliente. No se
exceda; personalice la relación con su cliente en grados. Si usted se vuelve demasiado
personal demasiado rápido, el cliente puede aprovecharse de usted. Evite ser demasiado
amigable o informal con su cliente –por ejemplo, comer juntos– porque corre el riesgo de
crear una sensación de estar en una relación de igualdad de la que se puede arrepentir y
que lo hace menos efectivo como ayudante.
El diálogo útil
En la AH, el ayudante y el cliente realizan una exploración conjunta dialógica. En este tipo
de discusión sin restricciones, ninguna persona sabe exactamente hacia dónde se dirigen
las cosas o qué movimientos adaptativos pueden surgir. Se trata de una conversación
abierta y de recopilación de información, no de la discusión competitiva y orientada a la
resolución de problemas convencional en la que los consultores y los clientes a menudo
caen como resultado de la presión de tiempo o de opciones de conversación limitadas. La
asesoría con humildad se basa en diez propuestas de trabajo:
1. Para ayudar realmente al cliente, el ayudante debe determinar su problema
específico.
2. Un diálogo franco con el cliente es la única manera de asegurar esta información.
3. Para entablar un diálogo exploratorio y revelador, el ayudante debe establecer una
relación de Nivel Dos con el cliente que vaya más allá de la relación típica de Nivel
Uno.
4. Construir una relación a Nivel Dos requiere personalizar la relación, sin exagerar.
5. La investigación humilde hace que esta relación sea especial. Implica preguntas
personales y expresar sentimientos y pensamientos personales.
6. Durante el contacto inicial, el ayudante explica la necesidad de desarrollar una
relación personal que alcance el Nivel Dos.
7. El ayudante y el cliente deben participar en un diálogo conjunto.
8. Determine si el problema es un solo problema o un conjunto de problemas
superpuestos que requieren más de una solución.
9. El ayudante y el cliente deben decidir conjuntamente las acciones necesarias para
abordar el problema o problemas del cliente y deben desarrollar prioridades.
10. Si el problema del cliente es simple, el ayudante puede adoptar una postura
consultiva tradicional. Si el problema es complejo, ayudante y cliente deben
planificar juntos los movimientos de adaptación. Saben que ello por sí solo
puede no resolver el problema, pero sí apuntar al movimiento de adaptación a
intentar.
El proceso
Como ayudante en el Nivel Dos, no caiga presa de la “seducción del contenido”, es decir,
de la consideración de cómo actuaría usted en el lugar del cliente. Usted no es su cliente;
no entiende su negocio o cultura corporativa de la manera en que este lo hace. Su papel
es ser un catalizador, dar ayuda y coaching. No intente hacerse cargo del problema; los
clientes deben resolver sus problemas. Esto significa que el cliente, no usted, tiene que
manejar el trabajo de diagnóstico y las soluciones sugeridas. Un ayudante eficaz incluye
directamente a los clientes en la determinación de lo que salió mal y cómo abordarlo.
La colaboración
Trabaje con los clientes para desarrollar acciones útiles de adaptación. Ayúdeles a evaluar
las posibles consecuencias. Ofrezca sugerencias sobre el proceso. Los clientes rara vez
consideran las ramificaciones de los cambios que quieren introducir y cómo podrían
afectar su cultura corporativa. Conocen sus objetivos, pero pueden no estar seguros de
cómo alcanzarlos o de cómo empezar. Muéstreles la mejor manera de proceder. Ayúdeles
a encontrar nuevas maneras de identificar y solucionar problemas.
Sobre el autor
El psicólogo social Edgar Henry Schein, PhD, es experto en desarrollo organizacional.
Anteriormente enseñó en la Sloan School of Management del MIT. También
escribió Preguntar con humildad.
HUMILDAD – Edgar H. Schein – Humble Consulting How to Provide Real Help Faster
– INGLES
Editorial Rating
7
Recommendation
Consultants can no longer operate as they once did: Assume the role of corporate doctor,
diagnose organizational challenges and provide detailed prescriptions. Traditional
consultancy is inadequate for today’s daunting business environment, says Edgar H.
Schein. He believes a fresh consultancy model is in order, and so he delivers it. The
“father of process consultation,” he spent 50 years teaching and researching
organizational culture. His “humble consulting” model helps consultants parse complex
issues and help their clients institute small, productive fixes. Schein believes the client and
consultant, without being too chummy, must develop “an open, trusting relationship” to be
effective working partners. getAbstract recommends his insightful, instructive manual to
consultants, counselors, coaches and even parents.
Take-Aways
Traditional consultancy is inadequate for today’s daunting business challenges.
Humble consulting (HC) doesn’t require a detailed diagnosis, ambitious
intervention, “quick fixes” or “knee-jerk reactions.”
Humble consultants understand complex issues and help clients institute small,
productive fixes.
They ask each client, “What problem are you trying to solve?”
With humble consulting, a client and a consultant develop an “open, trusting
relationship” in order to become effective working partners.
The humble consultant is a “helper.”
The helper illuminates the situation’s complexity and initiates quick “adaptive
moves.”
These “small interventions” sequentially lead to further small interventions.
The most effective adaptive move is helping the client to acknowledge the
problem’s “messiness” and to understand that conventional solutions won’t help.
Humble consulting also works for coaches, counselors and parents.
Summary
Organizational Problems
The problems that confront organizations today are complex, ambiguous and confusing.
They don’t yield easily to technical solutions and they often involve different cultural tropes,
constituent groups, assumptions, unaligned goals and disconnected silos. These problems
are generally unstable and in constant flux. Companies often try to gather the right people
to coordinate their thoughts and actions to fix things quickly. Even getting these people into
the same room can be difficult, if not impossible. Many times, they can’t communicate.
Almost always, they won’t agree.
“Clients often think they know how they want a problem approached, and because they
are paying for it, they think they know what the consultant can and should do for them.”
Complex problems don’t yield to standard consultative diagnosis and intervention. This
time-wasting strategy often targets the wrong issues. Most organizational problems require
a fresh approach to consulting, coaching and thinking. The approach is “Humble
consulting” (HC). It’s called “humble” because it acknowledges the complexity of the
problems clients face, as well as the difficulty of moving ahead productively. The goal of
HC is to have the consultant – or “helper” – assist the client in achieving something the
client can’t accomplish alone. It’s up to the client to decide if the helper was, indeed,
helpful.
“The depth of a relationship is a mutual decision based on the comfort level that each
party arrives at through interaction.”
This consulting method avoids “quick fixes” and “knee-jerk reactions.” It uses initial
diagnoses, “adaptive moves” and limited intervention. Adaptive moves are “small
interventions” that sequentially lead to other small interventions. The specific adaptive
moves that a consultant suggests will depend on the client’s particular problem. The most
effective adaptive move is to help clients acknowledge their problem’s “messiness,”
understand that conventional solutions won’t help, and accept that they need different
“problem solvers” and fresh conversations.
Useful Responses
Humble consulting features fast, useful responses to some part of a large problem or to
the big problem itself. Adaptive moves aren’t traditional consultative tools. Helpers using
HC strategies figure out which initial responses will work best. Thanks to HC, helpers don’t
have to fret that initially they “don’t know what to do.” With HC, the helper can be
vulnerable. This strategy isn’t just for consultants. Coaches, counselors and parents can
use this methodology fruitfully. Humble consulting depends on the helper building a
trusting relationship with the client, eliminating their initial “professional distance.” Building
a warm, friendly relationship, without excess chumminess, helps show the client that the
helper isn’t in charge and doesn’t intend to be.
First Contact
In your first contact with a client, communicate that you’ve come to help. You don’t want to
deliver a message that you’ve arrived to diagnose the firm’s situation and propose a
solution. Nor do you want to deliver a worse message: that you intend to promote yourself,
your insights and your skills. Instead ask the client, “What problem are you trying to
solve?”
“We are dealing with new complex problems, new kinds of client systems and a new
sense of urgency in our clients.”
Convey humility during interactions with your client. Make clear that you want to work with
the client to fix problems together, not to take over and impose your solution. The essential
assumptions of HC are that the helper cares about the client, is committed to assisting the
client, is curious about what the client faces and is determined to understand what the
client thinks about the problem. To support your clients, help them “clarify” their current
complex situation and understand it better. Explain that quick, adaptive moves offer the
most effective solutions. This approach is more practical than a detailed diagnosis and
multifaceted intervention.
“The Three Cs”
Humble consulting doesn’t use an “exploratory conversation” or diagnosis. Instead,
engage in a candid, positive discussion that fosters a strong relationship. Managing this
vital initial conversation requires the consultant to have the proper mind-set embodying the
three Cs:
1. “Commitment” – Be prepared emotionally to assist clients, who will sense a lack
of commitment.
2. “Curiosity” – Be genuinely curious about who your clients are and what they are
up against. Your clients will perceive any lack of curiosity and will know if you aren’t
genuinely interested in their problem.
3. “Caring” – Clients want to know that you’re on their side. Communicate your
allegiance by demonstrating your concern about them as individuals. Begin caring
about your clients – presumably strangers to you at first – by devoting attention to
what they say and think. Pay heed to how they explain their company and its
problems, and disregard what’s in the brochures and corporate background
materials you received in advance of your meeting. Clients will feel important and
honored to be the focus of your attention.
Relationships
Humble consulting depends on creating and nurturing quality relationships: “a set of
mutual expectations about each other’s future behavior based on past interactions.”
People in a relationship share a symmetry of expectations – knowledge that comforts
everyone involved. People in a relationship also share the responsibility for maintaining it.
One person in a relationship may work hard to keep it strong, but if the other person
doesn’t match this effort, the relationship suffers. In a weak relationship, no one feels
emotional involvement. In a strong relationship, emotional involvement is robust.
“Being ‘professional’ and ‘keeping appropriate distance between the helper and the client’
can be a terrible trap.”
People share four levels of relationships:
1. “Level Minus One” – These relationships are hostile or exploitative, like those that
could be part of the experience of “prisoners, POWs, slaves…elderly or emotionally
ill people,” people in unfamiliar cultures and victims of con men or criminals.
2. “Level One” – Emotions play little or no role in these impersonal relationships.
Everyone intuitively understands what others expect of them – for example, “I give
you something; you say ‘Thank you’.” Level One relationships become confusing
when people solicit the assistance of “so-called professional helpers – doctors,
lawyers, ministers and human relations helpers such as social workers, counselors,
and psychiatrists.” Professional distance separates the helpers and the people who
solicit their help. The helpers believe they must react impersonally when clients
share personal information. Clients feel at a disadvantage and that inhibits trust
and openness. Most consultants operate at Level One with their clients. Level One
can work for a consultant who understands the client’s problem and has the skills
to fix it.
3. “Level Two” – The client is no longer a “case” – someone the helper keeps at a
professional distance. The helper instead treats the client as an important person,
not a stranger. In return, the client feels comfortable and opens up to accepting
help. In Level Two relationships, helpers periodically ask, “Is what we are doing
really helping?”
4. “Level Three” – As an advanced state of connection, Level Three encompasses
“close friendships, love and intimacy.” Ethical concerns make Level Three
inappropriate for consulting work since it can lead to “fraternization, nepotism” and
other behaviors that are “corrupt” in a business environment. This is the stricture
that proscribes intimate relationships between therapists and patients or between
colleagues at work.
“The client asking you for help may…unwittingly ‘content seduce’ you into your official area
of expertise, and thereby get you preoccupied with your own personal skills and agenda.”
At the time of initial contact, the helper and the client, who usually are strangers, operate
at Level One. If the helper says the wrong things during this initial conversation, the
relationship will remain stuck at this level. Saying the right words can be “immediately
helpful” and can help the consultant develop a positive, productive Level Two relationship.
Managers who set out to help their “bosses, subordinates and peers” should bridge the
usual professional distance. They need to establish Level Two relationships with their
colleagues and consultants.
Listening
Humble consultants must be avid listeners who exhibit two different kinds of empathy. In
“Empathy One,” HC helpers listen carefully to learn about the client’s problem. In “Empathy
Two,” they continue to listen intently, but now they move on to trying to discover what
irritates the client about his or her problem. To illustrate, the client says, “I am concerned
about the level of engagement of my employees. Could you help me build a culture of
engagement?” In Empathy One, try to learn what the client means by “engagement” and
“culture.” In Empathy Two, ask, “Why are you worried about this?”
“The Level Two relationship has to be built around the joint task that the helper and client
are engaged in. It is bounded by the cultural rules [of] giving and receiving help.”
The HC helper isn’t aloof and doesn’t issue bloodless edicts about what the client should
do. To achieve a Level Two relationship, the helper interacts with the client. Don’t go
overboard; personalize your relationship with your client in degrees. If you get too personal
too quickly, the client may take advantage of you. Avoid getting too chummy or informal
with your client – for example, enjoying meals together – because you risk creating a
sense of being on an “equal footing” that you may come to regret and that may make you
less effective as a helper.
Helpful Dialogue
In HC, the helper and the client engage in a “dialogic joint exploration.” In this unfettered
type of discussion, neither person knows exactly where things are heading or what
adaptive moves may surface. This is an open, information-gathering conversation, not the
conventional “goal-oriented competitive problem-solving discussion” that consultants and
clients often fall into as a result of time pressure or limited conversational options.
“A Level Two task-oriented relationship becomes necessary in order to create enough trust
that the real motives, issues and concerns of both helper and client surface.”
Humble consulting rests on “ten working propositions”:
1. To truly assist the client, the helper must determine his or her specific problem.
2. A frank and open dialogue with the client is the only way to secure this information.
3. To engage in an exploratory, revealing dialogue, the helper must establish a Level
Two relationship with the client that goes beyond the typical Level One relationship.
4. Building a Level Two working relationship requires personalizing the relationship to
some extent, but don’t go overboard.
5. “Humble inquiry” makes this relationship special. It involves personal questions and
expressing personal feelings and thoughts.
6. During the initial contact, the helper explains the need to develop a personal
relationship that reaches Level Two.
7. The helper and client must participate in a joint dialogue.
8. Determine whether the problem is a single problem or a set of overlapping
problems that require more than one solution.
9. The helper and the client must “jointly decide” on the actions needed to address
the client’s problem or problems and should develop priorities.
10. If the client’s problem is simple, the helper can adopt a traditional consultative
posture. If the client’s problem is complex, the helper and the client should jointly
plan the best adaptive moves. While the client and helper understand this alone
may not solve the client’s problem, they know it may point to the best adaptive
move to try next.
The Process
As a Level Two helper, don’t fall prey to “content seduction” – that is, contemplating how
you’d act in the client’s shoes. You aren’t your clients. You don’t understand their business
or corporate culture in the way that they do. Your role is to be a catalyst and to provide
help and coaching – not to focus on your own abilities and priorities.
“Bosses and subordinates may have to find ways to personalize their relationships with
one another to facilitate more trust and open communication.”
Don’t try to take over the client’s problem. Clients need to solve their own problems. This
means the client – not you – has to handle “diagnostic work” and implement suggested
solutions. An effective helper directly includes clients in determining what went awry and
how to address it.
Collaboration
Work with clients to develop useful adaptive moves. Help them evaluate the possible
consequences of those moves. Offer “process suggestions.” Clients seldom consider the
ramifications of the changes they want to introduce and how they might affect their
corporate culture. Clients know their goals, but they may not be sure how to achieve them
or even how to start. Show them the best way to proceed. Help them find new ways to
identify and fix problems.
About the Author
Social psychologist Edgar Henry Schein, PhD, is an organizational development expert.
He formerly taught at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He also wrote Humble
Inquiry.
It’s 12:45 am and you’re laying there in bed, wide awake and in horror as you remember
something embarrassing you said when you were 12. It doesn’t help that you just watched
the news tonight and all they talked about was how awful everything is right now.
We live in a world where negative things seem to get all the attention, whether in our own
minds or otherwise. You get a whole bunch of positive thoughts but for some reason, the
one bad one takes control of your brain. Why is this? And how do we fix it?
Social psychologist Roy Baumeister and experienced science writer John Tierney are here
with the solutions in their book The Power of Bad: How the Negativity Effect Rules Us and
How We Can Rule It. You’ll get some answers on why negativity is so powerful, as well as
science-based strategies to bring more optimism into your life.
Let’s see how much we can learn from this book in just 3 lessons:
1. For every negative experience you have, try to get at least four positive ones.
2. People listen to criticism more even when it’s within a sea of compliments, but it
can help them grow if done correctly.
3. If you’re around someone with a bad attitude, you’re more likely to develop one
yourself, so you should remove these people from your life.
Negativity isn’t good but learning about it is about to help you become happier! Let’s go!
If you want to save this summary for later, download the free PDF and read it
whenever you want.
Lesson 1: You need to have five positive experiences to combat the overwhelming
effects of just a single negative one.
How do you measure whether you should stay in a relationship or not? The perfect one
doesn’t exist, after all. Our partners are usually great but once in a while their dark side
comes out. Does that mean you should leave?
One of the authors, Roy Baumeister, once asked himself this same question. To help him
decide, he started tracking the good, bad, and neutral days. Months later the data showed
that for every two good days there was 1 bad.
In other words, only 67% of days were good, so he left the relationship.
Baumeister’s efforts show the power of a positivity ratio, which is how many bad events
there are relative to good ones. It’s an important number, too, because research
shows that it has to be high if you want to succeed.
There’s a famous study by psychologist John Gottman that shows the truth of this. He had
married couples track their positive and negative interactions. In the end, those with an
even number of both broke up. But those who were the happiest had five good interactions
for every bad.
If you’re trying to improve yourself, though, Baumeister suggests you shot for a minimum
of four positives for every negative. So if you miss a run, for example, don’t be too hard on
yourself, just try to make it happen for the next four days.
Lesson 2: Sandwiching criticism between compliments doesn’t work, but when you
deliver feedback correctly it can help others grow.
I recently saw a video while scrolling through Facebook that interested me because I could
relate. It showed a woman standing between two large jars. One began filling slowly with
jelly beans, which eventually reached the brim.
The woman picked up the full jar and held it tight. Then one single jelly bean drops into the
other jar and she immediately drops the full one and picks the other up.
In this example, the jar full of jelly beans represents all of our positive interactions, while
the other is a symbol for the bad ones. The lesson, then, is that we have so much good
going on, but the negative takes over our minds, no matter how small.
Sometimes we need to give people feedback though. You might have heard that you
should say something nice, give the information, and then add another compliment at the
end. This is also known as the feedback sandwich, but it doesn’t work.
One psychologist did a study in which he told students they were reading words that
described their personalities. Although most were positive, a few insults were scattered in
there. Amid all the good, these were all the students could remember.
So when you need to give feedback, remember what doctors do when sharing bad news
with patients. They involve them in the conversation by asking them questions. This two-
way conversation helps them understand that they have more control than they initially
think.
Lesson 3: Remove people that have a bad attitude from your life so that you don’t
catch their infectious negativity.
Eliza Byington knows a thing or two about the power of a bad apple. Where once her office
was tense and gloomy, one day everything changed for the better. What happened? The
grumpiest employee started working from home!
They say that one bad apple will ruin the bunch, and this is true for people too. How you
feel and perform is a function of the attitudes of the people around you. In the famous
words of Jim Rohn:
“You are the average of the five people you spend the most time with.”
Science has a word or two to say about this, too. Patients who have good social
support, that is, a good network of family and friends who are positive, recover
faster.
On the other hand, if those family and friends are negative, they give social undermining
and slow recovery.
Research in the workplace shows similar results. Teams with only one person with a
negative attitude perform as bad as those where everyone is a downer! The authors
suggest watching out for three types of bad apples:
The Jerk, who is rude.
The Slacker, marked by laziness.
The Downer, a person that is always pessimistic.
To limit their effect on your team, start by catching it early before they can make things
worse. Another useful tactic is to change the situation, like a unique task or a different
environment.
Start My Risk-Free Trial »
The Power Of Bad Review
I love the lessons this book teaches! It may sound counterintuitive, but The Power Of
Bad is one of the best books on happiness that I’ve ever read. The advice and scientific
research to back it up is motivational to help anyone and everyone get over the bad things
in life to have more of the good!
Who would I recommend The Power Of Bad summary to?
The 29-year-old who is a pessimist at heart but is sick of always being miserable, the 53-
year-old that loves to learn about psychology and how to use it to improve their life, and
anyone that wants a new perspective on how to be happier.
STRESS – Robert M. Sapolsky – Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers The Acclaimed Guide
to Stress, Stress-Related Diseases, and Coping – BUENON
Editorial Rating
10
Recommendation
Your body is a sophisticated machine. If it were an automobile, it would be a top-of-the-
line, luxury-class vehicle with all of the latest options. There’s just one problem: Your body
was designed for the savannas of Africa, not the streets and sidewalks of some urban
metropolis. This is a major issue due to one of your body’s great fail-safe systems: the
stress-response mechanism, also called the “fight-or-flight syndrome.” This mechanism
provides your body with its best chance to get away safely from sudden peril, such as
when a lion attacks you. It immediately floods your muscles with robust energy. Thus
strengthened, you are far more able to evade the hungry predator. Unfortunately, this
same stress-response also kicks in during psychological stress. In much of modern city life
(even without stalking lions), such stress is often chronic, making your stress-response
mechanism work dangerously overtime, and putting your body at risk of numerous stress-
related disorders and diseases. Robert M. Sapolsky, a leading neuroendocrinologist,
explains it all in this lively and entertaining, yet highly informative book. He writes with
delightful, ironic verve and dry, irrepressible wit. He details how chronic stress can
undermine your health, and explains what you can do about it, even in the urban
jungle. getAbstract feels calmer just suggesting that anyone experiencing stress could
benefit from reading this book.
Take-Aways
The stress-response mechanism sends energy to the muscles during a short-term
physical crisis. This “fight or flight” response helps you escape from sudden danger.
Chronic stress can trigger this mechanism and keep it activated for long periods.
Such sustained stress-response activity can be horribly damaging to your health.
Even if you exercise, eat well, maintain a proper weight and get plenty of rest, you
still may become seriously, even fatally, ill.
However, science has not established a link between stress and cancer.
Preventative stress relief can stave off or reverse many disorders.
Regular exercise can substantially relieve stress.
Other stress relief tactics include meditating, getting psychotherapy, releasing
frustration, gaining control over your life or socializing more.
Most experts say you should not live in denial, but if a major catastrophe rocks your
life, denial can be a particularly effective coping strategy.
Positive thinking can mitigate stress and its damaging effects.
Summary
Lions and Tigers and Zebras, Oh My!
A zebra on an African savanna lives a less complicated life than the average urban-
dwelling human – but it is in far more danger. A zebra, indeed, all savanna animals, must
routinely contend with severe, acutely physical crises. While grazing, resting or just
ambling along, a zebra must be ready to race away in a split second if a large predator,
such as a lion or tiger, suddenly appears. Similarly, a lion must be instantly ready to stalk
and pursue the zebra. Otherwise, the predator can’t eat. Physically challenging activities
like racing away from predators or attacking prey are hugely stressful.
“There has been a revolution in medicine...It involves recognizing the interactions between
the body and the mind.”
Today, most people do not have to deal with lions. Instead, they face daily psychological or
social disruptions: worrying about taxes, getting along with relatives, feeling inadequate,
being overlooked for promotion, fretting about feeling ill and a million other things. Such
worries represent severe, sustained psychological stress.
“Stress-related disease emerges [because] we so often activate a physiological system
that has evolved for responding to acute physical emergencies, but we turn it on for
months on end.”
Return briefly to that sweltering savanna, home of the alert zebra and the hungry lion. Both
animals possess “physiological response mechanisms” that are perfectly adapted to deal
with their immediate physical emergencies: for the zebra, racing away from the lion, and
for the lion, capturing the zebra. Such stress-response mechanisms enable animals to
deal with short-term, highly stressful physical crises.
“Sustained or repeated stress can disrupt our bodies in seemingly endless ways.”
Once the chase is over, however, the animals’ stress-response mechanisms relax (if the
zebra survives). The stress-responses have done their jobs, and everything goes back to
normal. The animals’ bodies return to homeostasis, a default condition where physiological
traits such as oxygen level, temperature and acidity quickly stabilize. For the zebra, the
lion and the other creatures, once a physical crisis passes, all bodily systems quickly
return to default homeostatic “settings.” The stress-response did its job, the crisis is over
and things can quickly revert to the way they were.
“What goes on in your head can affect how well your immune system functions.”
All animals, including humans, possess this stress-response mechanism. Most people no
longer need to outrun lions, but this same stress-response mechanism unfortunately kicks
in when people feel psychologically stressed and it can remain active indefinitely in people
who feel chronically stressed. This can cause immense physical damage, and can lead to
major stress-related medical problems and diseases.
How Your Body Adapts to Psychological Stressors
Simple worry can trigger an instant stress response. The primary purpose of this
mechanism, also known as the “fight or flight syndrome,” is to deliver vast amounts of
energy to the muscles for fighting or running. (Interestingly, a different response
mechanism can trigger a separate “tend and befriend” response in women.) When the
stress response kicks in, glucose, simple proteins and fats pour out of the liver and fat
cells, and also come from certain muscles, to supply quick energy to the specific muscles
that will keep you alive, for example, leg muscles to run from danger. At the same time,
your breathing rate, heart rate and blood pressure increase to send oxygen and nutrients
at an accelerated rate throughout your body. Digestion is not necessary in a physical
emergency, so it immediately shuts down, as do growth and reproductive functions. Thus,
when the stress-response mechanism kicks in chronically, men find it difficult to maintain
erections, women ovulate less frequently, immunity is inhibited and the “perception of pain
is blunted.”
“Our current patterns of disease would be unrecognizable to our great-grandparents...We
are now living well enough and long enough to slowly fall apart.”
The stress-response mechanism does a superb job of helping an animal in a short-term
physical crisis. But the story is much different for humans. The radical physiological
changes provoked by the stress-response mechanism over a sustained period of chronic
psychological stress can be incredibly damaging. For example, mobilizing vast reserves of
energy during a nonphysical crisis depletes needed vigor, resulting in chronic fatigue.
Elevated blood pressure is great when you’re fleeing a hungry tiger, but having your blood
pressure soar every time you look at your kid’s messy bedroom or sit in traffic fretting
about being late to a meeting is worse than useless.
“Many of the damaging disease of slow accumulation can be either caused or made far
worse by stress.”
Chronic stress is a likely path to eventual cardiovascular disease. Chronically stressed
children can experience suppressed growth. Women’s menstrual cycles can swing wildly
out of whack. Hormones secreted during stress can harm the brain. Constant stress
increases your chances of becoming ill, including with infectious diseases, since the
stress-response inhibits immunity. It is at the root of many “stress”-related diseases.
Hormones and Their Relationship to Stress-Response
The autonomic nervous system is directly involved with stress-response. It includes the
sympathetic nervous system, which originates in the brain and travels through the spinal
column to every part of the body. It mediates the “four F’s of behavior – flight, fight, fright
and sex.” Stress makes this system release hormones, including adrenaline (also called
epinephrine) and norepinephrine. Stress also releases glucocorticoids (steroid hormones)
and glucagons, a hormone from the pancreas. These “chemical messengers” activate your
organs during stress. The autonomic nervous system also includes the parasympathetic
nervous system, which mediates calmness, “everything but the four F’s.”
“Zebras and lions may see trouble coming in the next minute and mobilize a stress-
response...but they can’t get stressed about events far in the future.”
The brain is the “master gland” that mobilizes all activities during stress. When the brain
experiences a stressor (worrying about taxes, getting yelled at), it quickly activates the
stress-response mechanism, flooding the body with hormones, the “workhorses” of your
stress-response mechanism, and raising your body’s glucose levels. The stress-response
also inhibits other hormones, such as testosterone, estrogen and progesterone.
“If you’re running 26 miles in a day, you’re either very intent on eating someone or
someone’s very intent on eating you.”
The immediate release of stress-fighting hormones to react to sudden danger can save
your life, but the routine release of such powerful hormones over an extended period is
incredibly harmful. Long-term stress-response is uniformly destructive. It wrecks your
metabolism, bursts blood cells, and elevates blood pressure and heart rate. It can cause
atherosclerosis, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and hypertension. It increases the risk of
gastrointestinal disorders and ulcers, which, by the way, are not a danger to zebras
because their stress is periodic, not chronic. The lion comes: big stress; the lion goes: no
stress. In human beings, chronic stress can affect memory and damage the brain, ruin
your sleep and accelerate aging. It is often a factor in depression. The list goes on and on.
(However, scientists have not yet established a firm link between cancer and stress.)
Treating Stress
Stress affects different people different ways, and so do stress relief methods. Experts
offer many possible stress reduction solutions, and recommend maintaining your “cognitive
flexibility” and perhaps trying various approaches to see if you are better served by
changing the stressor or by adjusting how you perceive it.
“Everything bad in human health now is not caused by stress, nor is it in our power to cure
ourselves of all our worst medical nightmares merely by reducing stress and thinking
healthy thoughts...Would that it were so. And shame on those who would profit from
selling this view.”
Should you concentrate on gaining control of your emotions or consider joining a club to
gain social support? Your choices depend on your personality and circumstances, as well
as the type of stressors you experience. You could adopt one coping strategy today and
another one tomorrow. Just trying something new is often the best strategy. Change can
be energizing and often extremely healthful. Different tactics you can test to try to ease the
harmful effects of chronic psychological stress, include:
Exercise – Improving your physical conditioning often significantly reduces stress.
Exercise elevates mood, lowers resting heart rate and blood pressure, and
increases lung capacity. Regular exercise lowers the risk of cardiovascular and
metabolic diseases, or makes it less likely that stress will exacerbate them.
Socialization – People who socialize often are less stressed than loners. But
choose your pals wisely. Even a little time with cantankerous people can be very
stressful.
Control – When nursing-home residents exercise more control over their own
affairs, they become happier and more content. Hospital patients who are able to
self-administer their painkillers also experience less stress. Whenever possible,
gain control of as many aspects of your life as possible, but don’t waste your time
with recriminations about past events or with efforts to control what may transpire in
the uncontrollable future.
Predictability – Though the future is unknowable, you will feel calmer if you do
know how and when something will occur than if you don’t. Thus, it often is helpful
to establish predictability when possible. On the other hand, sometimes knowing
too much about coming events can also become stressful.
Meditation – Glucocorticoid levels and blood pressure drop during meditation, but
it isn’t clear whether these salutary effects remain after the meditative experience.
The “80/20 rule” – The initial 20% of your efforts will reduce 80% of your stress.
As any mental health professional will tell you, getting a person to do something
about emotional problems – even just scheduling an appointment to discuss things
with a therapist – often makes all the difference. Thus it is productive to take action
of some kind to reduce stress. Instituting an immediate change is the best way to
relieve stress quickly. Do something to change your life. Take action now.
Denial – When life deals you a truly catastrophic hand, something that is far
beyond prevention, control and healing, denial often proves to be the best coping
strategy. In the face of utter disaster, never give up hope that things can improve.
This may sound utterly naive and optimistic, but such a positive attitude will help
you minimize stress.
Find an “outlet for your frustrations” – Maybe it’s swimming. Maybe it’s
smashing up ratty furniture in the backyard with a sledgehammer. Maybe it’s
singing a song at the top of your lungs. Whatever it is, do it regularly if it helps.
Repetition of stressful events – Ironically, the more often you do something
stressful, the less stressful it can become. Studies of Norwegian soldiers show that
their epinephrine and glucocorticoid levels are extremely high for hours before and
after their first few parachute jumps. But after a large number of jumps, their
hormone secretion patterns return to normal – except when they actually leap out
of the plane.
Psychotherapy – Professional help can change your behavior and the way you
handle stress, as well as altering your cholesterol profile and other health
indicators.
In the Absence of Magic Cures, Try for Serenity
Unfortunately, a magic pill for stress management does not exist. You may gain maximum
control and predictability, become a social leader, and engage in numerous stress-fighting
activities, and yet continue to suffer stress. Stress affects everyone differently, and how it
hits you may have as much to do with your prenatal biology and other noncontrollable
factors as with the positive steps you take.
“Hope for the best and let that dominate most of your emotions, but at the same time let
one small piece of you prepare for the worst.”
Many believe that spirituality and religion greatly alleviate stress and improve health. While
extensive literature exists on this subject, the jury is still out regarding the salutary effects
of religion and spirituality on stress. Strive to maintain a default position of “energized
calm” when stressors occur. While such a mental state may be hard to achieve during
psychological stress, this idealized goal offers real benefits.
“When something good happens, you want to believe that this outcome arose from your
efforts, and has broad, long-lasting implications for you.”
How can you achieve such admirable serenity? Christian theologian Reinhold Niebuhr
suggests one path with this immortal prayer: “God grant me the serenity to accept the
things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can and the wisdom to know
the difference.” The Quakers offer a profound, old-time saying: “In the face of strong winds,
let me be a blade of grass. In the face of strong walls, let me be a gale of wind.” With
psychological stress, sometimes your task may be to blow down a wall. Other times, it may
be to bend in a strong wind without breaking. Wisdom means knowing when to be the gale
and when to be the blade of grass.
“When the outcome is bad, you want to believe that it was due to something out of your
control, and is just a transient event with very local, limited implications.”
Here’s something far more prosaic: Did your grandparents tell you to stop worrying so
much? Or did your Mom? Such advice may sound banal and trivial, but scientists have
reduced the chances that lab rats will get sick by making them perceive their reality in a
positive way. Indeed, experts who study stress believe that your body’s “physiology is often
no more decisive than [its] psychology.” Maintaining a positive, optimistic attitude in the
face of trouble and stress can make all the difference. Think of the zebra; the lion will come
when and if it comes and, until then, you might as well graze.
About the Author
Robert M. Sapolsky is a professor of biological sciences, neurology and neurological
sciences at Stanford University. He conducts research on stress and neuron degeneration.
In 1987, he received a MacArthur Fellowship “genius” grant.
Reseña
El consultor Dan Pontefract ofrece una estrategia para pensar más claramente y tomar
mejores decisiones. Mientras explica cómo funciona su sistema “soñar, decidir, hacer”,
ofrece ejemplos de la vida real de pensadores abiertos cuyos logros provienen de sus
prácticas cognitivas deliberativas. La gente tiende a apresurarse a sacar conclusiones,
aceptar información errónea, saltarse matices o confiar en suposiciones superficiales. En
vez de eso, dice Pontefract, haz una pausa para reflexionar. La efectividad de su proceso
de pensamiento depende de qué tan bien clasifique la evidencia, reflexione sobre ella y
cuestione sus conclusiones. getAbstract recomienda el manual de Pontefract a quienes
deseen tomar mejores decisiones u obtener información útil sobre sus propios procesos
de pensamiento.
Ideas fundamentales
Las personas y las organizaciones a menudo llegan a conclusiones y toman
decisiones sin una consideración cuidadosa.
Un pensador abierto se toma su tiempo para reflexionar, sopesar la evidencia y
llegar a conclusiones informadas.
El pensamiento abierto equilibra la reflexión y la acción.
Los pensadores abiertos utilizan el pensamiento creativo, crítico y aplicado.
Cuestionan todo y se mantienen receptivos a las nuevas ideas.
El pensamiento abierto tiene tres aspectos: la creatividad, el juicio y la acción.
La creatividad depende de una cuidadosa deliberación e ideas audaces.
El juicio requiere razonamiento informado, análisis y toma de decisiones.
Tome acción solo después de aplicar una consideración atenta a la resolución de
problemas y a la toma de decisiones.
Como un pensador abierto, incluya tiempo para soñar, decidir y hacer cada día.
Resumen
Pausar para reflexionar.
Hoy día, la gente está más ocupada que nunca. Tienen poco tiempo para hacer algo bien,
incluido el proceso vital de pensar bien las cosas. Para muchas personas, el pensamiento
claro es un bien cada vez más escaso. La gente no siempre llega a los pasos necesarios
para sopesar cuidadosamente sus opciones, construir experiencia y llegar a sus propias
conclusiones razonadas para resolver problemas y tomar decisiones. Algunos
subcontratan su pensamiento creativo y crítico a Alexa, Siri o Wikipedia. Los pensadores
cerrados no están dispuestos a abrir sus mentes a nuevas ideas. Parecen pensar que es
más conveniente pasar por la vida aislado de la información y las ideas nuevas.
Demasiadas organizaciones también funcionan de manera cerrada.
“Cuando pensamos, estamos usando nuestra mente para formar o conectar activamente
una idea (…) Pensar es también un enfoque, una posibilidad, una deliberación, una
opinión o una actitud. Incluso puede ser una creencia o una conclusión””.
Muchas personas y empresas necesitan adoptar un nuevo proceso de pensamiento para
construir sus habilidades de toma de decisiones y agilidad. Este sistema de pensamiento
mejorado –pensamiento abierto– es un enfoque holístico de reflexión, toma de decisiones
y acción para asegurar un resultado ético. El pensamiento abierto requiere una
consideración cuidadosa para tomar acción a través de un proceso de “soñar, decidir y
hacer”. Con un pensamiento abierto, usted trabaja en un asunto, sopesa la evidencia,
decide cómo resolverlo y luego toma las medidas necesarias. El pensamiento abierto es
iterativo, inclusivo, contemplativo e interrogativo. Es deliberativo, no automático ni
reflexivo.
La reflexión y la acción.
El pensamiento abierto equilibra la reflexión y la acción. Si estos elementos no se alinean,
tres malos hábitos pueden arraigarse:
1. La indiferencia – El hábito atrapa a las personas a permanecer con sus métodos
y procesos de pensamiento actuales sin importar cuán contraproducentes sean.
2. La indecisión – Aquellos que tienen dificultades para tomar decisiones
constantemente se confunden sobre qué hacer o no hacer. Caen presas de
sueños interminables, un estado de ánimo que el experto en gestión estratégica H.
Igor Ansoff llama “parálisis por análisis”.
3. La inflexibilidad – Muchas personas se sienten incómodas pensando
conscientemente en lo que creen o en las acciones que van a tomar. Evitan
analizar sus propios procesos y se lanzan al agua. Eligen la actividad por encima
de una mezcla ponderada de ideación, pausa, consideración y respuesta (…) El
acto de hacer se convierte en lo más importante.
Dé la bienvenida a las buenas ideas.
Los pensadores abiertos permanecen receptivos a nuevas ideas e información de una
amplia variedad de fuentes. Aceptan conceptos innovadores y ven el dogma aceptado con
escepticismo. Los pensadores abiertos van más allá de lo que saben. Reconocen lo que
no saben y están dispuestos a aprender. Persiguen el descubrimiento incluso si el nuevo
conocimiento puede molestarlos o hacer pedazos su actual visión del mundo. Para
determinar si debe incorporar el pensamiento abierto en su forma de manejar la
información, realizar análisis y tomar decisiones, hágase tres preguntas sobre la forma en
que piensa ahora: ¿Dedica suficiente tiempo a reflexionar y soñar? ¿Se basa en datos
verificables para tomar decisiones? Y, ¿se toma el tiempo necesario para hacer las cosas
correctamente? El pensamiento abierto tiene tres elementos centrales:
1. El pensamiento creativo.
El pensamiento creativo abarca la ideación y la reflexión, que conducen a mejores ideas.
El mitólogo Joseph Campbell se hizo famoso por su detallada y perspicaz argumentación
sobre los arquetipos culturales. Su ejemplo más notable es el “héroe”, la inspiración para
el personaje de Luke Skywalker en la franquicia cinematográfica de La guerra de las
galaxias. Campbell se dio tiempo para reflexionar profundamente, abandonó la escuela de
postgrado para viajar y pensar antes de producir su clásico, El héroe de las mil caras.
“Pensar, como comer, es algo que todos hacemos. De hecho, todos estamos pensando
constantemente. Pero al igual que con la comida, hay hábitos saludables y no
saludables””.
Los pensadores abiertos están dispuestos a vagar y tomarse el tiempo necesario para
pensar las cosas. Tomarse el tiempo para pensar significa hacer tiempo para soñar
despierto, un componente esencial de la creatividad. Cuando sueña, se detiene y
observa. Pasa el tiempo pensando. Soñar despierto le ayuda a encontrar nuevas
soluciones y procesos. Para un aspirante a pensador abierto o practicante que quiere
hacer una pausa y reflexionar, el tiempo se convierte en el bien más valioso. No malgaste
su tiempo, como la mayoría de las organizaciones quieren que haga. Explóralo.
Establezca un sistema de gestión de tiempo de calidad para proteger su tiempo. No se
comprometa demasiado. Libere su día tanto como sea posible.
2. El pensamiento crítico.
El pensamiento crítico se centra en el análisis y el juicio; genera una mejor toma de
decisiones. Todo el mundo tiene sesgos cognitivos que se interponen en el camino del
pensamiento claro y lógico. Conozca sus prejuicios y compénselos. Desafíe su
pensamiento y las conclusiones a las que llega. Busque nuevas ideas e información. Esté
abierto a las opiniones opuestas o disconformes.
“Pensar mejor es difícil, no es fácil. Pensar mejor lleva tiempo, no prisa. No hay ningún
atajo””.
Colaborar con sus colegas ayuda a promover el pensamiento abierto. Pregunte a las
personas en las que confía y respeta sus sugerencias y consejos. Cuantas más personas
involucre en su toma de decisiones, mejores serán, dentro de unos límites. Al pensar en
nuevos enfoques y conceptos, tenga en cuenta que el fracaso no es negativo para las
personas u organizaciones si usted y su empresa evalúan sus errores. El fracaso puede
tener valor como experiencia de aprendizaje. Puede ayudarle a diagnosticar dónde su
pensamiento crítico personal o corporativo puede haberse descarrilado. Para aprovechar
al máximo los procesos y actividades cotidianas, así como los éxitos o fracasos, los
líderes deben ser pensadores abiertos que comprendan las cualidades cruciales de
liderazgo que forman parte del pensamiento crítico.
3. El pensamiento aplicado.
El pensamiento aplicado significa actuar sobre sus decisiones. El pensamiento aplicado
actualiza su compromiso de ejecutar una decisión. No se centra en qué hacer, sino en
cómo hacerlo. Para obtener los resultados deseados, el cómo siempre cuenta. Establezca
metas claras que todos los miembros de su equipo puedan entender. Para inspirar a sus
colegas para que desarrollen sus propias soluciones, apoye las soluciones que sugieren y
aplíquelas en un proceso de acción planificada. Demuestre su empatía y comprensión
acerca de su lucha para encontrar esas soluciones. Ya que las condiciones externas
cambiarán constantemente, manténgase flexible.
“Nuestros sentidos son bombardeados diariamente por propaganda política y noticias
falsas. Fluctuamos entre un alto nivel de filtrado y la credulidad. La verdad se está
volviendo cada vez más difícil de discernir””.
No asuma que sus soluciones de pensamiento aplicado siempre funcionarán bien o sin
problemas. No lo harán. Espere problemas en el camino. En cualquier esfuerzo reflexivo,
los tropezones y las bolas curvas vienen con el territorio. Evite que su organización se
convierta en una fábrica de acciones. Mantener a todo el mundo con un aspecto de estar
súper ocupados todo el tiempo puede generar un barniz de eficiencia, pero el trabajo
apurado no es eficiente. Usted quiere que sus empleados sean atentos en sus acciones.
Ello no puede ocurrir cuando todo el mundo se mueve a 100 kilómetros por hora. Ayude a
sus empleados y colegas a centrarse en el largo plazo, no en el corto plazo.
El pensamiento aplicado en su organización.
Al practicar el pensamiento aplicado, sea despiadado sobre el largo plazo. Sí, usted debe
lograr cosas hoy, pero no se deje seducir por el éxito aparente de la acción constante.
Usted puede, por reflejo, querer priorizar acciones inmediatas, y debe permanecer alerta
sobre el corto plazo, pero siempre pregunte cómo lo que haga hoy afectará su propósito
central y dará forma a su futuro. Para vigilar de cerca el corto plazo y estar al tanto del
largo plazo, perfeccione sus prácticas organizacionales internas, como la gestión del
tiempo. Reconozca que la información y los procesos se volverán obsoletos, a veces más
rápidamente de lo que pueda imaginar. Por lo tanto, si bien debe aceptar los errores, la
forma en que responda a estos aspectos inevitables de hacer negocios pondrá de relieve
la eficacia, o su ausencia, de su pensamiento aplicado. Construya una cultura ágil,
resiliente y tolerante; evite el pensamiento rígido.
El chef Peter Gilmore: un pensador abierto.
El chef ejecutivo australiano Peter Gilmore planifica y supervisa la preparación de
alimentos en dos restaurantes galardonados en Sidney, Australia: el Quay y el Bennelong.
Su forma de trabajar es un ejemplo de pensamiento abierto. Aplica la visualización
creativa cuando planea un nuevo platillo, comida o menú. Durante esta etapa, evita la
practicidad porque limitaría su pensamiento, pero nunca olvida que los platillos que crea
deben convertirse en elementos del menú. Equilibra la reflexión y la acción. Sus platillos
encarnan los aspectos del pensamiento abierto de soñar, decidir y hacer.
“La mayor barrera en nuestra sociedad es la falta de diálogo genuino y la práctica
crítica””. ( – Lisa Helps, alcaldesa de Victoria, Columbia Británica)
Para retener sus ideas emergentes, Gilmore escribe todo. Prueba nuevas recetas y se
mueve entre los pensamientos creativo, crítico y aplicado. Gilmore depende de la
colaboración con su equipo de cocina para desarrollar, formalizar y finalizar todos los
aspectos de un platillo. Documenta el proceso de preparación y el costo de los nuevos
platos. Se los explica al equipo del salón y ayuda a los camareros a describir la emoción y
la intención de un nuevo platillo a los clientes. Las cocinas de Gilmore funcionan como
campos de prueba y de demostración para el pensamiento abierto.
10 pautas esenciales para el pensamiento abierto.
Siga estos 10 principios para practicar el pensamiento abierto:
1. Permítase suficiente tiempo para pensar con claridad y de manera integral. Nunca
se apresure a pensar. El pensamiento abierto es un movimiento de pensamiento
lento.
2. Pensar demasiado, repensar y volver a repensar puede llegar a ser
contraproducente. Lo mismo puede ocurrir con demasiada colaboración. Después
de una cuidadosa reflexión y conversación, siga adelante con decisión.
3. Nunca tome medidas solo por tomarlas. Tenga cuidado y decida qué no va a
hacer.
4. Sea flexible en su forma de pensar. Deje que el conocimiento dé forma a sus ideas
y opiniones.
5. Escriba sus mejores pensamientos. El flujo de ideas es un recurso continuo.
6. Sea sistemático y organizado en todo lo que dice y hace. Los cerebros dispersos
son pensadores y planificadores ineficaces.
7. No se puede ser creativo si se está siempre ocupado. Tome descansos para
refrescarse y darse tiempo para que surjan nuevas ideas.
8. Busque información para permitir un análisis adecuado y una toma de decisiones
informada. Nunca se precipite. No se conforme con datos insuficientes. Lisa Helps,
alcaldesa de Victoria, Columbia Británica, piensa que la gente llega a conclusiones
prematuras después de leer “tres cosas en Facebook”. Ella enfrenta cada situación
lista para recibir información significativa.
9. Mantenga su concentración. No sucumba a distracciones que le hagan perder el
tiempo.
10. Como un pensador abierto, incluya tiempo para soñar, decidir y hacer cada día.
Agilidad y flexibilidad.
Los pensadores abiertos se mantienen flexibles y adaptables. Dion Hinchcliffe, director de
estrategia de 7Summits, un proveedor de soluciones en línea, dice que hay que probar
nuevas ideas si las viejas no funcionan. Hinchcliffe desarrolló un sistema de cinco pasos
para la resolución flexible de problemas:
1. Desarrolle una idea o solución.
2. Pruebe su idea. Experimente. Si falla, falle rápidamente.
3. Tome la decisión más refinada posible. Continúe resolviendo problemas.
4. Si no puede encontrar una solución, ponga el problema actual en el estante.
Concéntrese en un nuevo problema y trate de resolverlo en su lugar.
5. Mantener un ciclo alimenta la flexibilidad. Esté preparado para volver al problema
original. Este proceso lo educa continuamente.
“Los analfabetos del siglo XXI no serán los que no saben leer ni escribir, sino los que no
pueden aprender, desaprender y volver a aprender””. ( – Futurista Alfred Toffler)
John Dalla Costa, fundador del Centro de Orientación Ética de Toronto, dice que los
pensadores abiertos tienen tres rasgos:
1. Valor – Los pensadores abiertos se conectan con nuevas ideas, incluso si esas
ideas van en contra de su actual visión del mundo.
2. Responsabilidad – Los pensadores abiertos aceptan información nueva y
verificable y dan la bienvenida a nuevos datos que los acercan a una verdad
máxima.
3. Equidad – Los pensadores abiertos saben que la investigación y la
experimentación a menudo implican errores, que pueden ser los mejores maestros
de todos.
Sobre el autor
Dan Pontefract es el “visionario en jefe” de TELUS, una empresa de telecomunicaciones
canadiense, donde dirige la Oficina de Transformación, un grupo consultor sobre el futuro
del trabajo. También escribió Flat Army y The Purpose Effect.
LEADERSHIP – Flat Army – INGLES
Creating a Connected and Engaged Organization
Dan Pontefract
Editorial Rating
7
Recommendation
The old command-and-control management style still prevails, but it is as relevant to
contemporary business as horse-drawn carriages are to transportation. Engage and
empower will be the preferred management method in the future, as learning professional
Dan Pontefract explains. His title uses “flat” to mean equal and “army” to suggest ships
moving in unison like an armada – thus envisioning people of equal status working
collaboratively. While Pontefract can be obtuse (“Think of being continuous as defining
your level of leadership cadence”) or even nonsensical (“I want Flat Army to become a
disease within the organization”), most of his 90,000 words make solid sense, and he
writes with a refreshing, straight-from-the-shoulder style.
Take-Aways
Command and control has been the corporate default management approach.
Industrial efficiency expert Frederick Taylor and business management theorist
Henri Fayol championed this hierarchical, rigid system.
Command and control is obsolete and fosters employee disengagement.
The “Flat Army” approach draws on openness, sharing, harmony and trust.
Workers in a Flat Army experience “horizontal connectedness” and “psychological
ownership” of their work.
Flat Army leaders are “involving, empathizing, developing, communicating,
analyzing, deciding, delivering, cooperating” and “clowning.”
They must also “coach, measure, explore and adapt.”
“Collaborative leadership” is “continuous, authentic, reciprocal and educational.”
The “collaborative leader action model” has six aspects: “Connect, consider,
communicate, create, confirm quality results and congratulate” the team.
Transforming your company into a Flat Army firm takes time.
Summary
Command and Control
The command-and-control management style that dominated business operations for
hundreds of years is now completely outdated. Yet, even though smart, forward-looking
corporations should immediately retire this rigid, hierarchical system, it remains the default
management approach.
“Many leaders have somehow become so comfortable with the status quo that they do not
question why this pyramidal structure and operating practice continue to exist today.”
Command and control has significant historical roots. In 1600, Britain’s Queen Elizabeth I
approved the formation of the East India Trading Company (EIC) as the exclusive
commercial entity for all British trade east of Africa’s Cape of Good Hope. The EIC
patterned itself after the English monarchy, which exercised absolute power according to
divine right. This was the authority formula for all monarchies dating back to the Roman
Empire, which first introduced the command-and-control system. EIC exercised tight,
monopolistic control of all British commerce in India and throughout Asia, with 250,000
workers, a vast fleet and a rigid command-and-control management structure. At its most
powerful, the EIC thus controlled more than 20% of the global population.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol
Industrial efficiency expert Frederick Taylor and business management theorist Henri Fayol
provided the 20th century intellectual foundations for command and control. In 1911, Taylor
wrote The Scientific Principles of Management, which casts employees as puppets in the
scientific equations of industrial production time-efficiency studies. Fayol recommended
that all corporations adopt rigid hierarchical structures. He wrote: “To manage is to
forecast, to plan, to organize, to command, to coordinate and control.”
“Any individual in an organization can have an impact on any facet of the organization,
regardless of title or rank.”
Such inflexible hierarchies and dictatorships may have worked in the past, but they are no
longer appropriate, efficient or effective. Today’s employees insist upon being empowered
and engaged. They want to collaborate with everyone – their co-workers, their supervisors
and their companies’ top executives. They want open leadership and reject
micromanagers who dictate what they must do on a daily basis. Today’s employees want
no part of “hierarchical hell.”
Gallup reports that only 11% of today’s employees feel engaged at work. The other 89%
operates in sort of a “corporate coma.” Other research indicates that only a microscopically
small 0.3% of employees feel satisfied in their work. Companies cannot attain their best
results if most of their workers are withdrawn from or miserable with their work. Research
says employee engagement strongly affects your company’s bottom line. The income of
companies with engaged employees is up 19%, while firms with disengaged employees
suffer a 32% income drop. Turnover falls off by 87% when employees are engaged, and
performance increases by 20%.
Enlisting in the “Flat Army”
Today’s workforce needs Flat Army management. A “flat” structure suggests equality. The
term “army” derives from the Latin word armata, which concerns a fleet – an armada – of
ships moving together. This suggests a system in which everyone in an organization
advances smoothly in unison toward a shared goal. The Flat Army approach empowers
employees and engages them in a system of “horizontal connectedness.” It links them
together, builds their enthusiasm and provides a sense of “psychological ownership” of
their jobs.
“Openness, both as a quality of the leader and an expectation of the team, fosters a
harmonious relationship among all parties.”
In a Flat Army corporate culture, reciprocity matters. Everyone works together in harmony.
Financial goals are paramount, but staff well-being is a close second. The Flat Army
strategy of “trust, involvement and empathy” relies on five basic principles: “connection”
with engaged leaders, “collaboration” among staff and managers, “participation” in all kinds
of networks, “learning” on a continuous basis, and “technology” that enables connectivity
and cooperation.
“Pervasive learning and collaboration technologies” are primary elements of the Flat Army
philosophy. Learning is not restricted to the classroom. People learn as they work, through
social networks, from each other and via other channels.
“Connected Leader Attributes”
Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York is the ideal connected leader. He shares
information with his subordinates and collaborates with them when appropriate. To remain
fully accessible, Bloomberg does not work in a private office. He sits in the middle of a
large room – the “bullpen” – surrounded by his subordinates, none of whom work behind
closed doors or in cubicles.
“Millennials actually prefer to learn through mentoring than any other formal, informal or
social learning type.”
Bloomberg, the quintessential Flat Army leader, routinely displays the 15 attributes that
connected leaders must live by:
1. “Trusting” – Pay attention to what others think and say. Allow employees to make
mistakes without retribution so they can learn. Be consistent.
2. “Involving” – Make sure everyone on your team contributes. Eliminate barriers
that prevent subordinates from participating in team activities.
3. “Empathizing” – Consider what your workplace experience is like for the people
on your team. When people have difficulties, don’t be critical. Help them grow.
4. “Developing” – Provide pathways that enable your employees to develop
themselves professionally. Assist them in setting up individual “development action
plans.”
5. “Communicating” – Make sure your staffers get the information they need to do
their jobs well. Listen to everyone, no matter what his or her position may be.
6. “Analyzing” – Connect with your subordinates to ensure that your analysis of any
situation is accurate. Take the time you need to figure things out properly.
7. “Deciding” – Consider the effects of your decisions. Ask others for their opinions.
Examine all your options. Hold decision makers accountable.
8. “Delivering” – Never rush. Never dodge problems. Confront them head-on. When
you set objectives or make plans to achieve them, be firm.
9. “Cooperating” – Foster a spirit of cooperation among your team members. Don’t
isolate yourself from others. Involve your subordinates in all activities.
10. “Clowning” – People work better when they’re relaxed. Create a warm
atmosphere by lightening up and smiling. Don’t take yourself too seriously. Don’t be
afraid to tell a joke.
11. “Coaching” – Use every opportunity to counsel your subordinates. Provide them
with useful feedback, but never offer advice until you have all the facts.
12. “Measuring” – Pay attention to “quantitative business metrics,” like fiscal
numbers, and “qualitative humanistic metrics,” like employee work-satisfaction
levels.
13. “Exploring” – Play devil’s advocate to explore all options. Get out of your office
and learn what is taking place around you.
14. “Adapting” – Stay flexible. Be ready to change, no matter what the situation.
15. “Bettering” – Don’t settle for the status quo. Strive to increase the effectiveness of
your organization and to improve the workplace for your subordinates.
The “Participating Leader Framework”
To make your organization more inclusive and “direct-network driven,” become a
participatory leader by following the “CARE principle.”
“Don’t let fancy technology become a dividing influence in your newly engaged corporate
culture.”
It states that collaborative leadership should be:
“Continuous” – Promote participation at all times.
“Authentic” – Being real encourages the same behavior from your subordinates.
“Reciprocal” – Participatory leadership depends on give-and-take.
“Educating” – Teach your subordinates and urge them to learn.
The more direct contacts, networks and relationships you have, the more effective you can
be as a leader. Take the time to expand your “direct professional network.” Encourage your
subordinates to do the same. Constantly seek new knowledge and learn from your
subordinates. Utilize your personal or professional networks to share information.
“The Collaborative Leader Action Model”
Collaboration is “the unfettered allowance and encouragement of employees to both
contribute and consume knowledge, insight or ideas with any direct relationship via
professional or personal networks to achieve an outcome.”
The collaborative leader action model (CLAM) generates superior collaboration across any
firm. Its six facets are:
1. “Connect (with others)” – Don’t plan things alone; reach out to your employees
and benefit from their thinking.
2. “Consider (all options)” – Discuss your alternatives with your team.
3. “Communicate (the decision and action plan)” – Plan your actions and share
your plans with all your stakeholders.
4. “Create (the result)” – Business requires successful execution.
5. “Confirm (the result met the target)” – Quantify your outcome.
6. “Congratulate (through feedback and recognition)” – Employees want to know
that you value them, so honor their good work.
Pervasive Learning and Collaboration Technologies
Learning can occur anywhere at any time. Such pervasive learning can be “formal” and
take place at conferences or in classrooms. It can be “informal” and occur as webinars,
mentoring, podcasts and coaching. Or, learning can be “social” and spring from micro-
blogging, blogs, wikis, tagging, videos, online discussions, and so on. Today’s
“collaboration technologies” encompass the advanced, innovative tools you and your
employees can use to connect, cooperate, enjoy unfettered conversation and create
online content.
“Micro-managing...is merely another name for distrust.”
Establish a fruitful, shared context for that content by using online tools such as:
“Search” – Increase your contacts.
“Profiles” – Post professional portraits on Facebook and LinkedIn.
“Badging” – Identify talents and specialties.
“Ratings” – Let others rank your content.
“Tagging” – Use the most familiar accepted terms to identify content.
“The Flat Army in Action”
Successful companies that exemplify the Flat Army spirit include:
Hitachi – This Japanese firm’s culture exemplifies trust, collaboration and
openness. Anyone can speak with anyone, from mail clerks to the CEO. Its spirit
epitomizes the Flat Army philosophy: “Wa: harmony, trust and
respect; Makoto: sincerity, fairness, honesty and integrity; and Kaitakusha-Seishin:
pioneering spirit and challenge.”
Zappos – Visionary CEO Tony Hsieh has one prevailing corporate mantra:
Success depends on taking good care of your employees. This philosophy enabled
Zappos to increase its revenues from around $1.6 million in 2000 to nearly $2
billion in 2012.
HCL Technologies – This Indian global information-technology-services company
believes strongly in employee engagement. To promote that engagement, it hosts
an online forum in which any employee can participate. The CEO, Vineet Nayar,
and his executive team respond to any questions posted. Nayar says that the
purpose of this forum is to promote “open conversation” among all employees and
executives.
To roll out the Flat Army management style within your organization, first introduce the
collaborative leader action model. Later, focus on pervasive learning and collaboration
technologies. After that, institute the participative leader framework. But be patient;
converting an organization to a full-fledged Flat Army can take two or three years.
About the Author
As head of learning and coaching, Dan Pontefract is responsible for leadership
development and collaboration strategy for 40,000 TELUS team members. He is also the
author of Open to Think, The Purpose Effect and Lead. Care. Win.
Take-Aways
The sales process isn’t complicated, but many salespeople make it so.
Salespeople should reach out to a variety of people, not only their peers.
A poor first impression can make it virtually impossible to sell anything.
You can become a stronger salesperson if you fix what you don’t do.
Become an expert about your product, industry and customers.
Be an avid student of your buyers’ personalities and inclinations.
Develop your mastery of presenting, countering objections, closing sales and
dealing with prospects.
Focus your sales presentations on your buyers’ problems and present them with
solutions.
Buyers now hold all the cards.
Summary
The sales process isn’t complicated, but many salespeople make it so.
Professional selling always comes down to the relationship between two people – the
salesperson and the prospect. Often, it’s salespeople, not prospects, who undermine this
relationship. In fact, maladroit salespeople can find dozens of ways to mess up their sales,
but salespeople don't need to work in fear.
“Nothing happens in a company until someone sells something.”
Actually, the sales process isn’t that complicated, though salespeople can turn it into a
labyrinth with a million dead-ends. To avoid the pitfalls, set a straightforward path by
knowing your field and focusing on your buyers.
Salespeople should reach out to a variety of people, not only their peers.
Selling to people who aren’t like you can be tough, but if you confine your sales efforts only
to your peers, you won’t make much money.
“Around 90% of salespeople give up after the fourth call. Statistics, however, show that
when it comes to prospects, more than three-quarters say no four times before they make
their purchase.”
To develop profitable relationships with people who differ from you, become a chameleon
and adapt yourself to them and their concerns. Many salespeople can’t make this
adjustment, but you can if you think of it as turning your attention totally to your clients,
even those you may not understand at first.
A poor first impression can make it virtually impossible to sell anything.
Salespeople must be observant and acutely sensitive to the moods, styles and
personalities of their prospects. To get on their wavelength, adjust how you come across.
Your goal is to be in harmony with your potential buyer.
“Today’s successful salesperson is likable, reliable and oozes integrity.”
If you do not align with your prospects, you may inadvertently turn them off by being out of
step with how they dress, act, speak or carry themselves. Within the first 30 seconds of
meeting you, prospects intuitively make tacit assumptions about what kind of person you
are and whether they will feel good about you. This is simple human nature. The
prospect’s gut reaction to you, although not necessarily rational, boils down to liking you or
not. That instinctive response will influence whether someone buys from you. This is why
your first – and follow-up – impressions are so important. This highlights the need to
develop objective self-awareness. Know who you are and how people – including your
prospects – feel about you.
You can become a stronger salesperson if you fix what you don’t do.
Weak salespeople must strengthen their work and improve their results. To become a
stronger salesperson, you need to:
Operate strategically. Pay attention to targets and goals.
Learn from setbacks and failures. You can gain crucial lessons from deals that
don’t work out.
Stay positive and upbeat with your clients and colleagues.
Shelve your negative feelings, including anger.
Carefully serve your small clients, not just the big shots.
Educate yourself about your offerings. You can’t just hand a prospect a brochure
anymore. Build up deep knowledge in your area of sales, and read the relevant
trade journals. Recognize the value of research. Knowledge is power, and it
enhances your credibility.
Be sincere, straight and honest. Faking authenticity doesn’t work.
Put in the necessary hours to make enough calls, including cold calls.
Work past your last planned sales appointment. If you finish early, spend time
prospecting instead of stopping for the day.
Engage in advanced sales training and work to improve your sales skills.
Plan your sales calls. Always show up on time for sales appointments.
Persevere when prospects turn you down.
Show prospects the features and benefits that make your goods or
services special. Don’t fall for the myth that customers care only about price.
Stay on top of your paperwork and record-keeping.
Listen to your prospects. They have important information to share.
Get to know your customers. Show concern about helping them achieve their goals
instead of focusing only on your sales objectives. Build relationships with your
clients, and stay in touch with former buyers.
Follow up on sales. Weak salespeople worry that if they contact their buyers after
the sale, the buyers will cancel the order. Deciding to keep your head down and
stay out of sight is not a winning sales philosophy.
Use trial closes.
Spot your prospects’ buying signals, and understand that their objections are
genuine.
Use PowerPoint effectively to make factual sales presentations. Don’t try to be
flashy.
“Ask for the order.”
Send thank-you cards to customers after successful sales.
Become an expert about your product, industry and customers.
Successful salespeople acquire and leverage knowledge. They learn all they can about
their buyers – who they are, what they want, and what they like and don’t like.
“Sales is only complicated if you let it become more about getting the order and less about
meeting your customers’ needs.”
Additionally, good salespeople strive to become experts about their products or
services, their industry and their competition. This knowledge gives productive salespeople
a business advantage. Top salespeople are curious, constantly on the lookout for the next
big opportunity and always asking: “What if…?”
Be an avid student of your buyers’ personalities and inclinations.
Selling is the ultimate people business. To do well, you must be acutely tuned into your
buyers’ personalities and inclinations. Selling is a professional endeavor that requires you
to know a great deal not only about your products, services and industry, but also
about your prospects and their businesses.
“Prospects can spot a slick sales pitch from a mile away; sales presentations need to be
delivered in an inclusive, interactive fashion and not as a product or salesperson’s ego
trip.”
Do you know everything you should about your customers? Are they complex
corporations? Small businesses? Franchises? Family-owned enterprises? Do you
understand their organizational structure and decision-making process? What about their
finances? Can they afford what you’re selling? Which internal executives have the
authority to make purchases? Are you in touch with the right people?
You also need a sound working knowledge of your own company. Fully commit to your
company, not because it pays you, but because you believe in it, its offerings and its
mission. Be loyal to your firm. You can’t expect prospects to be enthusiastic about your
company if you’re not.
Develop your mastery of presenting, countering objections, closing sales and
dealing with prospects.
Leading salespeople can handle all aspects of selling, including presentations, answering
objections, closing contracts and following up. They aren’t afraid to ask prospects for their
business straight out.
“Salespeople the world over seem to find every way possible to screw up getting the order,
when in reality closing a sale is the natural conclusion to a positive interaction between
those with a need and those with something that can satisfy that need at a price the
prospect can afford to pay.”
To top salespeople, the closing phase is a satisfying exercise, the logical culmination of
their previous positive sales activities and interactions with prospects. The contract is
a logical, sensible agreement between two parties who share a transaction. One has a
need and the other can fulfill it at an acceptable price. In contrast, weak salespeople falter
and stumble when they try to close and can’t quite wrap up the deal.
Focus your sales presentations on your buyers’ problems and present them with
solutions.
Salespeople must present effectively to succeed. To impress your audience, detail the
challenges that face your prospects and explain how your offering can solve those
problems. Open with relevant facts and figures, and stress how you will accomplish the
client’s goals.
“Sales is only complicated if you let it become more about getting the order and less about
meeting your customers’ needs.”
Keep your presentation brief – no more than 20 minutes. On each PowerPoint slide,
include no more than 10 short bullet points in readable text.Touch only briefly on your
firm’s stature and experience, and don’t feature detailed financial information on your
slides. Use hand-outs instead. When you are done, take questions. Focus on painting
a positive picture of how things will change when the prospect buys from you.
Buyers now hold all the cards.
Sales have always been tough, but they’re becoming tougher because customers have
gained all the power. Be assured that your prospects have researched their product
options on line, including price comparisons, so they are far more informed than clients
were in the past. Today’s customers also can buy from suppliers who are based almost
anywhere, from your town to the other side of the planet.
“Back in the 1950s, salespeople had all the power; today that power has shifted to the
customer. Never before have salespeople had to sell to such knowledgeable people.”
With such challenges, salespeople must operate at the top of their game. Now you know
what bad salespeople do or don’t do. Here’s what great salespeople do:
Maintain integrity.
Adapt their sales persona to make each prospect comfortable.
Stay well-informed, likable, reliable and trustworthy.
Offer research that helps buyers make purchasing decisions.
Select prospects carefully, and pitch to firms that need and can afford their
offerings.
Treat buyers as respected partners in decision-making.
Figure out what customers need. Understand their personalities and build lasting
relationships.
Delve into prospects’ objections, including hidden objections.
Listen instead of doing all the talking.
Read prospects’ buying signals.Ask open-ended questions and probe for more
information.
Suggest purchases that serve their clients instead of being pushy.
Stay in touch with customers and maintain strong relationships so clients see
them as a valuable resource.
The awards Eberhardt has garnered for her groundbreaking work include the
William James Book Award from the American Psychological Association and
The Society for Personality and Social Psychology Book Prize. Bias was
Nonfiction Runner-Up for the Dayton Literary Peace Prize.
Esquire.com found this to be, “an exhaustive investigation of how bias infiltrates every
sector of public and private life…Eberhardt offers tips for reforming business practices,
police departments and day-to-day interactions in pursuit of a fairer world for
everyone.” Psychology Today admires it as, “An immensely informative and insightful
analysis of race-based stereotypes….[that] also offers practical suggestions for managing
mechanisms of prejudice that ‘are rooted in the structures of our brains’.”
Racial Categories
Writing in crisp language, Eberhardt says the human brain evolved with a “same-race
advantage,” a built-in bias that, she asserts, often leads to the misidentification of criminals
if they’re from a different race than their victims.
Bias determines who gets to shine, who’s allowed to stand out, who is lauded for being a
‘disrupter,’ and who is sidelined for being disruptive.JENNIFER L. EBERHARDT
White Americans, the author reports, often associate African-Americans with aggression,
and so they misinterpret Black people’s facial expressions. Parents transmit biases to
their children. When kids see someone being treated badly or without respect, they
assume that person must be bad and must deserve poor treatment.
Police Interactions
Eberhardt details how, shockingly, police officers killed almost 1,000 people in the US in
2016. The author developed training methods for law enforcement personnel to help them
combat implicit bias. She showed officers and non-officers words related to criminal
activity, and discovered this caused them to focus attention on a Black face instead of a
white one. Study participants saw Black people’s bodies as bigger and more threatening
than they were.
California mandates the collection of demographic data for every police interaction.
Eberhardt explains that residents of Oakland, California advocated for this record-
keeping in the late 1990s when “vigilante cops” framed innocent people, assaulting and
arresting them.
Eberhardt invites readers into the saga of how her team analyzed 28,000 police stops in
Oakland between 2013 and 2014 and found that police disproportionately stopped
Black residents, and were more likely to arrest them than white residents they stopped.
Oakland police, the author notes, hear “male Black” hundreds of times daily over their
radios. They pair race and crime, and that subliminally affects their perceptions.
Eberhardt’s on-the-ground research and profound immersion in these law enforcement
issues grants her particular credibility when describing police officers’ emotions.
Research and real-life experience have shown that if officers act in accordance with four
tenets – voice, fairness, respect, trustworthiness – residents will be more inclined to think
of the police as legitimate authorities.JENNIFER L. EBERHARDT
Police stop Black people twice as often as whites. Some departments use stops as a
revenue source. When minor traffic stops escalate, Eberhardt reveals, police charge
drivers with other offenses. Arrested drivers must post bail, but the poor often can’t afford
it. With great compassion and quiet outrage, Eberhardt chronicles how, when the system
detains and imprisons people, their bills mount, their employers grow impatient, their
landlords threaten to evict them, and they lose custody of their children.
This makes suspects desperate for freedom, so they enter guilty pleas, even when they’re
innocent. Then they must live with the long-term consequences of a criminal conviction.
Discrimination
Eberhardt describes the stringencies of racism in American life before the Civil Rights
movement: government-backed segregation determined where Blacks went to school,
what parks their children could play in, and what restaurants, hotels and hospitals would
accept them. Despite integration, economic disparities separate Black and white people
today.
Integrated schools promise to turn us into global citizens, appreciative of cultural
differences, skilled at navigating diversity.JENNIFER L. EBERHARDT
Eberhardt sadly offers the shocking truth that segregation in the United States has “more
than tripled” since the 1980s, due to court rulings constraining busing and overturning
desegregation programs.
Bias extends beyond prejudice against African-Americans, the author notes. For example,
from 2015 to 2017, anti-Semitic acts including threats and vandalism spiked 60%.
Starbucks
After a Starbucks manager had two Black customers arrested because they used his
shop’s bathroom without buying coffee, Starbucks closed all its stores to conduct
employee training on discrimination. This effort may not change employee biases, but
it proclaimed that Starbucks will not tolerate discrimination. Eberhardt applauds Starbucks’
conviction and believes public displays by large corporations breed greater tolerance, or at
least reduced tolerance for intolerance.
Impassioned Scholarship
Jennifer Eberhardt won a rare honor: a MacArthur fellowship. You cannot apply for this
considerable cash award. You cannot lobby for it. The MacArthur Foundation gives its
rewards on the basis of the recipients’ creativity and contribution to society. The judges
chose Eberhardt for her evocative, readable writing, which is rare among academics, and
for the impact of her work. The number of years she put in on the front lines of research in
her field are even more unusual. Eberhardt earned the qualifications and standing to write
credibly about the processes of bias in the United States. She never devolves into political
rant, though she also doesn’t try to hide her sadness, frustration and outrage. Amazingly,
Eberhardt believes that progress against bias is possible. Delving into her extraordinary
report is an excellent first step in making that progress.