Act2 - 16040887

Instituto Tecnológico de Durango.
Diseño Avanzado de Estructuras de Concreto.

Miguel Ángel R. Reyes 16040887 Ingeniería Civil.
Método Directo del ACI.

Se analiza el siguiente entrepiso, correspondiente a una losa de entrepiso diseñada para una
sala de juegos:
kg
f'c ≔ 280 ――
cm 2
Se calcula el espesor mínimo de la losa utilizando el método empírico del peralte efectivo. Se
analiza el tablero D-E ; 3-4 ya que es donde se encontrará el espesor mayor:
5.25 m + 6.5 m + ((1.25 ((5.25 m + 6.5 m))))

hminDE34 ≔ ―――――――――――――= 14.6875 cm
180
El resultado obtenido se redondea a los 15 cm.
Como siguiente paso se procede a calcular el peralte mínimo por el método ACI:
Verificación por deflexiones ( α ), se analiza el tablero más desfavorable:
α1
kg kg
h ≔ 15 cm a ≔ 50 cm fy ≔ 4200 ―― 2
f'c ≔ 280 ――
cm cm 2
bw ≔ 30 cm lde ≔ 6.5 m
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2 A2 ⋅ y2 + A1 ⋅ y1
y ≔ ――――― → ―――――
A1 + A2 A2 + A1
lde bw
l2 ≔ ― + ―= 3.4 m
2 2
beq ≔ ‖ if bw + ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 4 ⋅ h| | = 0.65 m

‖ || l2 ⋅ h 3
‖ ‖ beq ← bw + ((a - h)) Ixs1 ≔ ――= 95625 cm 4
|| |
‖ ‖ | 12
-1-
beq ≔ ‖ if bw + ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 4 ⋅ h| | = 0.65 m

‖ || l2 ⋅ h 3
‖ ‖ beq ← bw + ((a - h)) Ixs1 ≔ ――= 95625 cm 4
|| |
‖ ‖ | 12
a
A1 ≔ a ⋅ bw = 1500 cm 2 y1 ≔ ―= 25 cm Ecb ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
2
h
A2 ≔ h ⋅ ⎛⎝beq - bw⎞⎠ = 525 cm 2 y2 ≔ a - ―= 42.5 cm
2 Ecs ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2
y ≔ ――――― = 0.2954 m
A1 + A2
2 2
bw ⋅ a 3 ⎛⎝beq - bw⎞⎠ ⋅ h 3 ⎛ a⎞ ⎛ h⎞ 4
Ixb1 ≔ ――― + ――――― + A1 ⋅ ⎜y - ―⎟ + A2 ⋅ ⎜a - y - ―⎟ = 441440.9722 cm
12 12 ⎝ 2⎠ ⎝ 2⎠
Ixb1 = 441440.9722 cm 4 Ixs1 = 95625 cm 4
Ecb ⋅ Ixb1
α1 ≔ ―――= 4.6164
Ecs ⋅ Ixs1
α2
kg kg
h ≔ 15 cm a ≔ 50 cm fy ≔ 4200 ―― f'c ≔ 280 ――
cm 2 cm 2
bw ≔ 30 cm l34 ≔ 5.25 m
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2
y ＝ ―――――
A1 + A2
l34 bw
l2 ≔ ― + ―= 2.775 m
2 2
beq ≔ ‖ if bw + ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 4 ⋅ h| | = 0.65 m

‖ || l2 ⋅ h 3
‖ ‖ beq ← bw + ((a - h)) Ixs1 ≔ ――= 78046.875 cm 4
|| |
‖ ‖ | 12
a
A1 ≔ a ⋅ bw = 1500 cm 2 y1 ≔ ―= 25 cm Ecb ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
2
h
A2 ≔ h ⋅ ⎛⎝beq - bw⎞⎠ = 525 cm 2 y2 ≔ a - ―= 42.5 cm
2 Ecs ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2
y ≔ ――――― = 0.2954 m
A1 + A2
-2-
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2
y ≔ ――――― = 0.2954 m
A1 + A2
2 2
bw ⋅ a 3 ⎛⎝beq - bw⎞⎠ ⋅ h 3 ⎛ a⎞ ⎛ h⎞ 4
Ixb1 ≔ ――― + ――――― + A1 ⋅ ⎜y - ―⎟ + A2 ⋅ ⎜a - y - ―⎟ = 441440.9722 cm
12 12 ⎝ 2⎠ ⎝ 2⎠
Ixb1 = 441440.9722 cm 4 Ixs1 = 78046.875 cm 4
Ecb ⋅ Ixb1
α2 ≔ ―――= 5.6561
Ecs ⋅ Ixs1
α3
A1 ⋅ y1 + a2 ⋅ y2
y ＝ ――――― h ≔ 15 cm a ≔ 45 cm
A1 + A2 bw ≔ 25 cm l34 ≔ 5.25 m l23 ≔ 4.5 m
kg l34 l23
f'c ≔ 280 ―― l2 ≔ ― + ― = 4.875 m
cm 2 2 2
beq ≔ ‖ if bw + 2 ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 8 ⋅ h| | = 0.85 m
‖ || l2 ⋅ h 3
‖ ‖ beq ← bw + 2 ((a - h)) Ixs3 ≔ ――= 137109.375 cm 4
|| |
‖ ‖ | 12
a
A1 ≔ a ⋅ bw = 1125 cm 2 y1 ≔ ―= 22.5 cm Ecb ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
2
Ecs ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
h
A2 ≔ h ⋅ ⎛⎝beq - bw⎞⎠ = 900 cm 2 y2 ≔ a - ―= 37.5 cm
2
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2
y ≔ ――――― = 0.2917 m
A1 + A2
2 2
bw ⋅ a 3 ⎛⎝beq + bw⎞⎠ ⋅ h 3 ⎛ a⎞ ⎛ h⎞ 4
Ixb3 ≔ ――― + ――――― + A1 ⋅ ⎜y - ― ⎟ + A2 ⋅ ⎜a - y - ― ⎟ = 333281.25 cm
12 12 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
Ixb3 = 333281.25 cm 4 Ixs3 = 137109.375 cm 4
Ecb ⋅ Ixb3
α3 ≔ ―――= 2.4308
Ecs ⋅ Ixs3
α4
-3-
α4
A1 ⋅ y1 + a2 ⋅ y2
y ＝ ――――― h ≔ 15 cm a ≔ 45 cm
A1 + A2 bw ≔ 25 cm lde ≔ 6.5 m lcd ≔ 5 m
kg lde lcd
f'c ≔ 280 ―― l2 ≔ ― + ―= 5.75 m
cm 2 2 2
beq ≔ ‖ if bw + 2 ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 8 ⋅ h| | = 0.85 m
‖ || l2 ⋅ h 3
‖ ‖ beq ← bw + 2 ((a - h)) Ixs3 ≔ ――= 161718.75 cm 4
|| |
‖ ‖ | 12
a
A1 ≔ a ⋅ bw = 1125 cm 2 y1 ≔ ―= 22.5 cm Ecb ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
2
Ecs ≔ 15100 ⋅ ‾‾‾
f'c
h
A2 ≔ h ⋅ ⎛⎝beq - bw⎞⎠ = 900 cm 2 y2 ≔ a - ―= 37.5 cm
2
A1 ⋅ y1 + A2 ⋅ y2
y ≔ ――――― = 0.2917 m
A1 + A2
2 2
bw ⋅ a 3 ⎛⎝beq + bw⎞⎠ ⋅ h 3 ⎛ a⎞ ⎛ h⎞ 4
Ixb3 ≔ ――― + ――――― + A1 ⋅ ⎜y - ―⎟ + A2 ⋅ ⎜a - y - ―⎟ = 333281.25 cm
12 12 ⎝ 2⎠ ⎝ 2⎠
Ixb3 = 333281.25 cm 4 Ixs3 = 161718.75 cm 4
Ecb ⋅ Ixb3
α4 ≔ ―――= 2.0609
Ecs ⋅ Ixs3
Cálculo del peralte mínimo, realizando el tablero más desfavorable:

650 cm
β ≔ ――― = 1.2381 Ln ≔ 650 cm
525 cm *Como todas nuestras deflexiones
⎛ fy ⎞
Ln ⋅ ⎜0.8 + ――――⎟ dan un alfa mayor a 2, se utiliza la
⎜ kg ⎟
14000 ―― formula de peralte mínimo
⎜⎝ cm 2 ⎟⎠ mostrado.
h ≔ ―――――――― = 15.1667 cm
36 + 9 ⋅ β
Nuestro peralte mínimo sigue siendo de 15 cm.
-4-
Se verifica que la rigidez relativa de cada panel sea mayor de 0.2 y menor de 5:
α1 ⋅ l2 2
0.2 < ――― <5
α2 ⋅ l1 2
α1 = 4.6164 α2 = 5.6561 α3 = 2.4308 α4 = 2.0609
l1 ≔ 4.875 l2 ≔ 5.75
Panel 1 Panel 2
⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2
――――― = 1.1487 hor. ――――― = 1.9108 hor.
⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

――――― = 0.8706 ver. ――――― = 1.0129 ver.
⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
Panel 3 Panel 4
⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2
――――― = 1.9108 hor. ――――― = 1.1487 hor.
⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

――――― = 1.0129 ver. ――――― = 1.6849 ver.
⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α1 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
Panel 5 Panel 6
-5-
Panel 5 Panel 6
⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2
――――― = 0.7091 hor. ――――― = 1.1795 hor.
⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

――――― = 2.7295 ver. ――――― = 1.6409 ver.
⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
Panel 7 Panel 8
⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2
――――― = 1.1795 ――――― = 0.7091 hor.
⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

――――― = 1.6409 ――――― = 2.7295 ver.
⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α4⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
Panel 9 Panel 10
2
⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 ⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2
――――― = 1.1487 hor. ――――― = 1.9108 hor.
⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

――――― = 1.6849 ver. ――――― = 1.0129 ver.
⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
Panel 11 Panel 12
⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2
――――― = 1.9108 hor. ――――― = 1.1487 hor.
⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

――――― = 1.0129 ver. ――――― = 1.6849 ver.
⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α4 + α1⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2
Todos los paneles cumplen con la condición.
Análisis de Cargas:
-6-
Análisis de Cargas:
Como la losa arroja un espesor mínimo de 15 cm., se propone una losa aligerada con las
siguientes caracteristicas:
b1 ≔ 15 cm b2 ≔ 65 cm h1 ≔ 15.5 cm h2 ≔ 5 cm ( esp ≔ 15 cm )
kg
Se propone casetón de 50 cm. x 50 cm. x 15.5 cm. Pconc ≔ 2400 ――
m3
Se calcula el momento de inercia de la losa si fuera sólida:

b2 ⋅ esp 3
Isld ≔ ―――= 18281.25 cm 4
12
Se calcula el momento de inercia de la losa aligerada:
⎛ h1 ⎛ h2 ⎞⎞
⎜⎛⎝b1 ⋅ h1⎞⎠ ⋅ ―+ ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ h2⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜h1 + ―⎟⎟
⎝ 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠⎠
yt ≔ ――――――――――― = 13.7253 cm
⎛⎝b1 ⋅ h1⎞⎠ + ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ h2⎞⎠
2 2
b1 ⋅ h 1 3 ⎛ h1 ⎞ b2 ⋅ h 2 3 ⎛ h2 ⎞
Ialg ≔ ――― + ⎛⎝b1 ⋅ h1⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜yt - ―⎟ + ――― + ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ h2⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜⎛⎝h1 + h2 - yt⎞⎠ - ―⎟ = 19571.9005 cm 4
12 ⎝ 2⎠ 12 ⎝ 2⎠
Propuesta ≔ ‖ if Ialg < Isld ||

‖ ||
‖ ‖‖ esp ← “Aumentar espesor del casetón” | |
‖ | |
‖ if Ialg > Isld | |
‖ ‖ esp ← “Se acepta espesor” | |
‖ ‖ |
yt = 13.7253 cm Ialg = 19571.9005 cm 4 Isld = 18281.25 cm 4
Propuesta = “Se acepta espesor”
Pconc ⋅ ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ b2 ⋅ ⎛⎝h1 + h2⎞⎠ - ⎛⎝⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ ⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ h1⎞⎠⎞⎠ kg

CMlosa_alg ≔ ――――――――――――――― = 271.8817 ――
b2 ⋅ b2 m2
-7-
Pconc ⋅ ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ b2 ⋅ ⎛⎝h1 + h2⎞⎠ - ⎛⎝⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ ⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ h1⎞⎠⎞⎠ kg

CMlosa_alg ≔ ――――――――――――――― = 271.8817 ――
b2 ⋅ b2 m2
kg
CMlosa_alg ≔ 272 ――
m2
kg kg
Aplanado de yeso: 1 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 0.02 ⋅ 1500 ―― = 30 ――
m2 m2
kg
Pega azulejo: por especificación 5 ――
m2
kg kg
Piso de granito: 1 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 0.02 ⋅ 3500 ―― 2
= 70 ――
m m2
kg kg kg kg kg
Carga muerta: Cmuerta ≔ 272 ―― 2
+ 30 ―― 2
+ 5 ――2
+ 70 ――2
= 377 ――
m m m m m2
kg
Carga viva: Cviva ≔ 350 ――
m2
kg
valor de W; W ≔ 1.2 ⎛⎝Cmuerta⎞⎠ + 1.6 ⎛⎝Cviva⎞⎠ = 1012.4 ――
m2
kg
W ≔ 1013 ――
m2
Existe una condición que indica que la división entre la carga viva y la carga muerta no
debe ser mayor a 2.
Cviva
――― = 0.9284 Se acepta.
Cmuerta
kg
Wu ≔ W ⋅ .65 = 658.45 ―― .65 separación entre nervaduras.
m2
Se procede a realizar el cálculo del momento, donde:

Wu : Peso de la losa.
ln : Lado a analizar.
l2 :Franja perpendicular del lado analizado. -8-
Se procede a realizar el cálculo del momento, donde:

Wu : Peso de la losa.
ln : Lado a analizar.
l2 :Franja perpendicular del lado analizado.
Analisis de ejes horizontales:
Eje 1-A B:
Wu ⋅ 2.5 ⋅ 5.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――― = 1080.2695 ――
8 m2
Eje 1-B C:
Wu ⋅ 2.5 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――― = 874.5039 ――
8 m2
Eje 1-C D:
Wu ⋅ 2.5 ⋅ 4.75 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 977.3867 ――
8 m2
Eje 1-D E:
Wu ⋅ 2.5 ⋅ 6.25 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 1286.0352 ――
8 m2
Eje 2-A B:
Wu ⋅ 4.5 ⋅ 5.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――― = 1944.4852 ――
8 m2
Eje 2-B C:
Wu ⋅ 4.5 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――― = 1574.107 ――
8 m2
Eje 2-C D:
Wu ⋅ 4.5 ⋅ 4.75 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 1759.2961 ――
8 m2
Eje 2-D E:
-9-
Eje 2-D E:
Wu ⋅ 4.5 ⋅ 6.25 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 2314.8633 ――
8 m2
Eje 3-A B:
Wu ⋅ 4.875 ⋅ 5.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――― = 2106.5256 ――
8 m2
Eje 3-B C:
Wu ⋅ 4.875 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――― = 1705.2826 ――
8 m2
Eje 3-C D:
Wu ⋅ 4.875 ⋅ 4.75 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 1905.9041 ――
8 m2
Eje 3-D E:
Wu ⋅ 4.875 ⋅ 6.25 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 2507.7686 ――
8 m2
Eje 4-A B:
Wu ⋅ 2.875 ⋅ 5.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――― = 1242.31 ――
8 m2
Eje 4-B C:
Wu ⋅ 2.875 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――― = 1005.6795 ――
8 m2
Eje 4-C D:
Wu ⋅ 2.875 ⋅ 4.75 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 1123.9947 ――
8 m2
Eje 4-D E:
Wu ⋅ 2.875 ⋅ 6.25 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 1478.9404 ――
8 m2
Análisis de ejes verticales:
- 10 -
Wu ⋅ 2.875 ⋅ 6.25Diseño Avanzado kg de Estructuras de Concreto.
MoA34 ≔ ――――― = 1478.9404
Miguel Ángel ――
R. Reyes 16040887 Ingeniería Civil.
8 m2
Análisis de ejes verticales:
Eje A-1 2:
Wu ⋅ 3 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――= 1049.4047 ――
8 m2
Eje A-2 3:
Wu ⋅ 3 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――= 1049.4047 ――
8 m2
Eje A-3 4:
Wu ⋅ 3 ⋅ 5 kg
MoA34 ≔ ―――= 1234.5938 ――
8 m2
Eje B-1 2:
Wu ⋅ 5 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――= 1749.0078 ――
8 m2
Eje B-2 3:
Wu ⋅ 5 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――= 1749.0078 ――
8 m2
Eje B-3 4:
Wu ⋅ 5 ⋅ 5 kg
MoA34 ≔ ―――= 2057.6563 ――
8 m2
Eje C-1 2:
Wu ⋅ 4.75 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ―――――= 1661.5574 ――
8 m2
Eje C-2 3:
Wu ⋅ 4.75 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ―――――= 1661.5574 ――
8 m2
Eje C-3 4:
- 11 -
Eje C-3 4:
Wu ⋅ 4.75 ⋅ 5 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――= 1954.7734 ――
8 m2
Eje D-1 2:
Wu ⋅ 5.75 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ―――――= 2011.359 ――
8 m2
Eje D-2 3:
Wu ⋅ 5.75 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ―――――= 2011.359 ――
8 m2
Eje D-3 4:
Wu ⋅ 5.75 ⋅ 5 kg
MoA34 ≔ ――――= 2366.3047 ――
8 m2
Eje E-1 2:
Wu ⋅ 3.5 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA12 ≔ ――――― = 1224.3055 ――
8 m2
Eje E-2 3:
Wu ⋅ 3.5 ⋅ 4.25 kg
MoA23 ≔ ――――― = 1224.3055 ――
8 m2
Eje E-3 4:
Wu ⋅ 3.5 ⋅ 5 kg
MoA34 ≔ ―――― = 1440.3594 ――
8 m2
Cálculo de la constante de torsión para viga tipo L:
- 12 -
Cálculo de la constante de torsión para viga tipo L:
Cálculo del parámetro βt :

C
βt ＝ ――
2 ⋅ Is
Opción A Opción B
Para la opción A:
bwL ≔ 25 cm beqL ≔ 65.5 cm aL ≔ 50 cm h ≔ 15 cm
⎛ 0.63 ⋅ bwL ⎞ bwL 3 ⋅ aL ⎛ 3

0.63 ⋅ h ⎞ h ⋅ ⎛⎝beqL - bwL⎞⎠
Ca ≔ ⎜1 - ―――⎟ ⋅ ―――+ ⎜1 - ―――― ⎟ ⋅ ――――― = 213316.6667 cm 4
⎝ aL ⎠ 3 ⎝ ⎛ ⎞
⎝beqL - bwL⎠ ⎠ 3
Para la opción B:
⎛ 0.63 ⋅ bwL ⎞ bwL 3 ⋅ ⎛⎝aL - h⎞⎠ ⎛ 3

0.63 ⋅ h ⎞ h ⋅ beqL
Ca ≔ ⎜1 - ―――⎟ ⋅ ――――― + ⎜1 - ――― ⎟ ⋅ ――― = 163316.6667 cm 4
⎝ ⎛ a
⎝ L - h ⎞
⎠ ⎠ 3 ⎝ b eqL ⎠ 3
Se utiliza el mayor valor de C:
C ≔ Ca = 163316.6667 cm 4
Método del Marco Equivalente.
- 13 -
Método del Marco Equivalente.

Se analiza el siguiente entrepiso, correspondiente a una losa de entrepiso diseñada para una
sala de juegos:
- 14 -

Act2 - 16040887

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Act2 - 16040887

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Instituto Tecnológico de Durango.

Diseño Avanzado de Estructuras de Concreto.

Método Directo del ACI.

5.25 m + 6.5 m + ((1.25 ((5.25 m + 6.5 m))))

beq ≔ ‖ if bw + ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 4 ⋅ h| | = 0.65 m

beq ≔ ‖ if bw + ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 4 ⋅ h| | = 0.65 m

Ixb1 = 441440.9722 cm 4 Ixs1 = 95625 cm 4

beq ≔ ‖ if bw + ((a - h)) ≤ bw + 4 ⋅ h| | = 0.65 m

Ixb1 = 441440.9722 cm 4 Ixs1 = 78046.875 cm 4

Ixb3 = 333281.25 cm 4 Ixs3 = 137109.375 cm 4

Ixb3 = 333281.25 cm 4 Ixs3 = 161718.75 cm 4

Cálculo del peralte mínimo, realizando el tablero más desfavorable:

Nuestro peralte mínimo sigue siendo de 15 cm.

α1 = 4.6164 α2 = 5.6561 α3 = 2.4308 α4 = 2.0609

⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l1 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

⎛⎝α2 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

⎛⎝α3 + α3⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2 ⎛⎝α3 + α2⎞⎠ ⋅ l2 2

Todos los paneles cumplen con la condición.

Se calcula el momento de inercia de la losa si fuera sólida:

Propuesta ≔ ‖ if Ialg < Isld ||

yt = 13.7253 cm Ialg = 19571.9005 cm 4 Isld = 18281.25 cm 4

Propuesta = “Se acepta espesor”

Pconc ⋅ ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ b2 ⋅ ⎛⎝h1 + h2⎞⎠ - ⎛⎝⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ ⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ h1⎞⎠⎞⎠ kg

Pconc ⋅ ⎛⎝b2 ⋅ b2 ⋅ ⎛⎝h1 + h2⎞⎠ - ⎛⎝⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ ⎛⎝b2 - b1⎞⎠ h1⎞⎠⎞⎠ kg

Se procede a realizar el cálculo del momento, donde:

Se procede a realizar el cálculo del momento, donde:

Analisis de ejes horizontales:

Cálculo de la constante de torsión para viga tipo L:

Cálculo de la constante de torsión para viga tipo L:

Cálculo del parámetro βt :

bwL ≔ 25 cm beqL ≔ 65.5 cm aL ≔ 50 cm h ≔ 15 cm

⎛ 0.63 ⋅ bwL ⎞ bwL 3 ⋅ aL ⎛ 3

⎛ 0.63 ⋅ bwL ⎞ bwL 3 ⋅ ⎛⎝aL - h⎞⎠ ⎛ 3

Se utiliza el mayor valor de C:

Método del Marco Equivalente.

Método del Marco Equivalente.

También podría gustarte