Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
SEMINARIO DE DOCTORADO
Dr. Marcelo Alegre, Dra. Paula Gaido, Dr. Roberto Gargarella, Dr. Julio Montero, Dr. Eduardo
Rivera Lpez, Dra. Marina Velasco
Duracin: 36 horas
Presentacin
El presente seminario se propone explorar dos familias de problemas relacionadas con la teora
de la democracia. La primera de ellas se refiere a cmo debe una democracia lidiar con
violaciones de derechos humanos cometidas en el pasado. En particular, se desea analizar qu
responsabilidad les cabe a diversos actores institucionales, especialmente a los jueces, por su
participacin en un orden institucional criminal. A los trabajos ya clsicos en la materia, se han
aadido en la ltima dcada importantes contribuciones que brindan un nuevo marco terico
para pensar sobre estos problemas. La influyente obra Complicity de Christofer Kutz fue seguida
por numerosos artculos y libros que elaboran criterios de asignacin de responsabilidad
sumamente novedosos. La segunda familia de problemas que el seminario aborda explora
algunos desarrollos recientes en el campo de la teora de la democracia, como su relacin con la
justicia distributiva, la igualdad, la prctica constitucional y el poder. Luego de discutir aportes
recientes de importantes autores como Thomas Christiano y Philip Pettit, se analizan una serie de
perspectivas crticas que obligan a revisar varios aspectos de la nocin tradicional de democracia.
Objetivos
El principal objetivo del seminario es discutir una serie de problemas relacionados con la teora
de la democracia y la responsabilidad moral por violaciones derechos de derechos humanos. Se
espera asimismo brindar a los/as participantes un entrenamiento intensivo en la prctica
argumentacin filosfica.
Cronograma de lecturas
1 de abril
Julio Montero: Human rights, international human rights and sovereign political authority.
22 de abril
13 de mayo
C. Kutz, Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age, caps. 4 y 5 (a cargo de Ezequiel
Monti).
10 de junio
R. Goodin y C. Lepora, Complicity and its conceptual cousins, working paper (a cargo de Julio
Montero).
1 de julio
22 de julio
2 de septiembre
23 de septiembre
21 de octubre
J. Waldron: Constitutionalism: A Skeptical View, Public Law and Legal Theory Research
Papers Working Series, Paper N. 10-87 (a cargo de Marcelo Alegre).
11 de noviembre
2 de diciembre
Jane Mansbridge, Jane Bohman, David Estlund: The place of self-interest and the role of power
in deliberative democracy, The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1) (2010), pp. 64-100 (a
cargo de Ezequiel Monti).
Actividades
Todos los participantes del seminario deben cumplir con una asistencia del 75%, colaborar con la
presentacin y discusin de los textos durante el seminario y colaborar en la realizacin de una
memoria de lo discutido durante las reuniones.
Evaluacin
Para la aprobacin del seminario se debe presentar adems un trabajo escrito de entre 4.000 y
5.000 palabras, que desarrolle un argumento original relacionado con alguno de los temas
discutidos durante el curso. La fecha de entrega del trabajo es el viernes 19 de diciembre. Se
brindarn ms precisiones respecto del trabajo final durante la cursada.
Bibliografa general
Sobre Democracia
Arneson, R., 2002, Democracy at the National Level, in Philosophy and Democracy,
ed. T. Christiano, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beitz, C., 1989, Political Equality: An Essay on Democratic Theory, Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Buchanan, J. and Tullock, G., 1965, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of
Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Christiano, T., 1996, The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory,
Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Dahl, R., 1959, A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downs, A., 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.
Dworkin, R., 2000, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Ely, J. H., 1980, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Elster, J., 2002, The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,
in Philosophy and Democracy, ed. T. Christiano, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Estlund, David, 2002, Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of
Democratic Authority, in Philosophy and Democracy, ed. T. Christiano, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Gould, C., 1988, Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Cooperation in Politics,
Economics and Society, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hayek, F., 1960, The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hume, D., 1748, Of the Original Contract, in Hume's Ethical Writings, ed. Alasdair
MacIntyre, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.
Madison, J., Hamilton, A. and Jay, J., 1788, The Federalist Papers, ed. Isaac Kramnick,
Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 1987.
Rawls, J., 1996, Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, revised
edition.
Rousseau, J.-J., 1762, The Social Contract, trans. Charles Frankel, New York: Hafner
Publishing Co., 1947.
Schumpeter, J., 1956, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and
Row.
Waldron, J., 1999, Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, I. M., 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Appiah, Anthony, 1987, Racism and Moral Pollution, Philosophical Forum, 18: 185
202.
Bar-on, Zvi, 1991, Measuring Responsibility, in Larry May and Stacey Hoffman
(eds.), Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied
Ethics, Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bates, Stanley, 1971, The Responsibility of Random Collections, Ethics, 81: 343
349.
, 1999, Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency, New York:
Cambridge University Press.
, 1998, Responsibility and the System, in Peter French (ed.), Individual and
Collective Responsibility, Rochester, VT: Schenkman.
Copp, David, 1979, Collective Actions and Secondary Actions, American
Philosophical Quarterly, 16: 177186.
, 1984, What Collectives Are: Agency, Individualism and Legal Theory, Dialogue,
23: 253268.
Crawford, Neta, 2007, Individual and Collective Moral Responsibility for Systematic
Military Atrocity, Journal of Political Philosophy, 15/2: 187212.
Durkheim, Emile, 1895, The Rules of Sociological Method, trans. W. D. Halls, New York:
Free Press, 1982.
French, Peter, 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility, New York: Columbia
University Press.
Friedman, Marilyn and Larry May, 1985, Harming Women as a Group, Social Theory
and Practice, 11: 218221.
Gilbert, Margaret, 1997, Group Wrongs and Guilt Feelings, Journal of Ethics, 1: 65
84.
Goldman, Alvin, 1970, A Theory of Human Action, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gomperz, H., 1939, Individual, Collective and Social Responsibility, Ethics, 49: 329
342.
Hardin, Garret, 1968, The Tragedy of the Commons in Science, 162: 124348.
Hurwitz, Agnes, 2009, The Collective Responsibility of the State to Project Refugees,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaspers, Karl, 1961, The Question of German Guilt, trans. by E.B. Ashton, New York:
Capricorn.
Kutz, Christopher, 2000, Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age,New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Le Bon, Gustav, 1896, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, London: T. Fisher
Unwin.
, 1987, The Morality of Groups, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
, 2006, State Aggression, Collective Liability, and Individual Mens Rea Midwest
Studies in Philosophy, XXX: 309324.
May, Larry and Hoffman, Stacey (eds.), 1991, Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of
Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics, Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
May, Larry and Strikwerda, Robert, 1994, Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for
Rape, Hypatia, 9: 134151.
McGary, Howard, 1986, Morality and Collective Liability, Journal of Value Inquiry,
20: 157165.
Miller, David, 2007, National Responsibility and Global Justice, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Osiel, Mark, 2009, Making Sense of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Pfeiffer, Raymond S., 1988, The Meaning and Justifications of Collective Moral
Responsibility, Public Affairs Quarterly, 2: 6983.
Radzik, Linda, 2001, Collective Responsibility and Duties to Respond, Social Theory
and Practice, 27: 455471.
Raikka, Juha, 1997, On Dissociating Oneself from Collective Responsibility, Social
Theory and Practice 23: 19.
Reiff, Mark, 2008, Terrorism, Retribution, and Collective Responsibility Social Theory
and Practice, 28(3): 442455.
Sadler, Brook Jenkins, 2006, Shared Intentions and Shared Responsibility Midwest
Studies in Philosophy, XXX: 115144.
Sartre, Jean-Paul, 1960, Critique of Dialectical Reason, trans. Alan Sheridan-Smith, New
York: Verso, 1976.
Simmel, Georg, 1971, On Individuality and Social Forms, trans. D. N. Levine, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Smiley, Marion, 1992, Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Sosa, David, 2009, What is It Like to Be a Group? Social Philosophy and Policy, 26
(1): 212226.
Janna Thompson, 2002, Taking Responsibility for the Past: Reparations and Historical
Injustice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Beld, Ton, 2002, Can Collective Responsibility For Perpetrated Evil Persist
Over Generations?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 5(2): 1812000.
Weber, Max, 1914, Economy and Society, Vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1978.