Está en la página 1de 12

“AÑO DE LA UNIDAD, LA PAZ Y EL DESARROLLO”

UNIVERSIDAD PRIVADA DEL NORTE

FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DE LA SALUD


CARRERA DE PSICOLOGÍA

DOCENTE:

➢ ANDY RICK SÁNCHEZ VILLENA

ESTUDIANTES:

➢Álvarez Silva, Diana Marina (si trabaj )


➢Campos Chávez, Roxana Elizabeth (si trabaj )
➢Chomba Cabanillas, riana erbelina (si trabaj )
➢León Altamirano, Mirella Yojana (si trabaj )
➢ are a Espinoza, athia (si trabaj )
➢Sán hez alenz ela, o ani anira (si trabaj )

CURSO:

CONSTRUCCI N DE PRUEBAS PSICOL GICAS

Ciclo Académico:
2023–
Resultados

Descriptivas
Descriptivas

Asimetría Curtosis

N Media Mediana DE Asimetría EE Curtosis EE

Item 1 299 4.13 4 0.835 -0.5624 0.141 -0.3976 0.281


Item 2 299 2.36 2 1.134 0.2765 0.141 -0.8237 0.281
Item 3 299 3.30 3 1.008 -0.0298 0.141 -0.0514 0.281
Item 4 299 2.16 2 1.106 0.6531 0.141 -0.3001 0.281
Item 5 299 1.95 2 1.024 0.8568 0.141 0.1221 0.281
Item 6 299 2.38 2 1.148 0.3406 0.141 -0.7121 0.281

Análisis Factorial Exploratorio


Cargas de los Factores

Factor

1 2 Unicidad

Item 1 0.578 0.763


Item 2 0.600 0.421
Item 3 0.520 0.697
Item 4 0.644 0.517
Item 5 0.818 0.371
Item 6 0.522 0.603

Nota. El método de extracción ‘Residuo mínimo’ se usó en combinación con una rotación ‘oblimin’
[3]

Comprobaciones de Supuestos

Prueba de Esfericidad de Bartlett

χ² gl p

432 15 < .001


Medida de Idoneidad del Muestreo KMO

MSA

Global 0.777
Item 1 0.694
Item 2 0.796
Item 3 0.836
Item 4 0.748
Item 5 0.758
Item 6 0.812

Análisis de Fiabilidad
Estadísticas de Fiabilidad de Escala

Alfa de Cronbach ω de McDonald

escala . .

[3]

Análisis de Fiabilidad
Estadísticas de Fiabilidad de Escala

Alfa de Cronbach ω de McDonald

escala 0.685 0.688

[3]

Análisis de Fiabilidad
Estadísticas de Fiabilidad de Escala

Alfa de Cronbach ω de McDonald

escala 0.597 0.607

[3]

Referencias
[1] The jamovi project (2023). jamovi. (Version 2.4) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

[2] R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from
https://cran.r-project.org. (R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2023-04-07).
[3] Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. [R package]. Retrieved from
https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych.
Resultados

Análisis Factorial Exploratorio


Cargas de los Factores

Factor

1 Unicidad

item2 0.623 0.612


item4 0.651 0.576
item5 0.654 0.573
item6 0.571 0.674

Nota. El método de extracción ‘Residuo mínimo’ se usó en combinación con una rotación ‘oblimin’
[3]

Análisis de Componentes Principales


Cargas de los Componentes

Componente

1 Unicidad

[3]

Análisis de Fiabilidad
Estadísticas de Fiabilidad de Escala

Alfa de Cronbach

escala 0.719

[3]

Structural Equation Modelling


Models Info

Estimation Method DWLS .


Optimization Method NLMINB
Number of observations 320
Free parameters 20
Standard errors Robust
Scaled test Mean adjusted scaled and shifted
Converged TRUE
Iterations 13

Model Endogenous1=~item2+item4+item5+item6

Nota. Variable (item2,item4,item5,item6) has been coerced to ordered type.


[4] [5]

Overall Tests

Model tests

Label X² df p

User Model 3.95 2 0.139


Baseline Model 600.66 6 < .001
Scaled User 7.63 2 0.022
Scaled Baseline 492.71 6 < .001

Fit indices

95% Confidence Intervals

Type SRMR RMSEA Lower Upper RMSEA p

Classical 0.033 0.055 0.000 0.136 0.350


Robust 0.020 0.128 0.045 0.226 0.059
Scaled 0.020 0.094 0.030 0.169 0.110

User model versus baseline model

Model

Comparative Fit Index (CFI) 0.997


Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 0.990
Bentler-Bonett Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI) 0.990
Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI) 0.997
Bentler-Bonett Normed Fit Index (NFI) 0.993
Bollen's Relative Fit Index (RFI) 0.980
Bollen's Incremental Fit Index (IFI) 0.997
Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) 0.331
Additional fit indices

Model

Hoelter Critical N (CN), a=0.05 485.1732


Hoelter Critical N (CN), a=0.01 745.2922
Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) 0.9964
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) 0.9599
Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI) 0.0906
McDonald Fit Index (MFI) 0.9970
Expected Cross-Validation Index (ECVI) .
Loglikelihood user model (H0) .
Loglikelihood unrestricted model (H1) .
Akaike (AIC) .
Bayesian (BIC) .
Sample-size adjusted Bayesian (SABIC) .

Estimates

Measurement model

95% Confidence Intervals

Latent Observed Estimate SE Lower Upper β z p

Endogenous1 item2 1.000 0.0000 1.000 1.00 0.695


item4 1.083 0.0981 0.890 1.27 0.753 11.03 < .001
item5 1.099 0.0978 0.907 1.29 0.764 11.24 < .001
item6 0.897 0.0908 0.719 1.07 0.623 9.87 < .001

Variances and Covariances

95% Confidence Intervals

Variable 1 Variable 2 Estimate SE Lower Upper β z p

item2 item2 0.517 0.0000 0.517 0.517 0.517


item4 item4 0.433 0.0000 0.433 0.433 0.433
item5 item5 0.416 0.0000 0.416 0.416 0.416
item6 item6 0.611 0.0000 0.611 0.611 0.611
Endogenous1 Endogenous1 0.483 0.0633 0.359 0.607 1.000 7.64 < .001

Intercepts

95% Confidence Intervals

Variable Intercept SE Lower Upper z p

item2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000


item4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
item5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
item6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Endogenous1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Thresholds

95% Confidence Intervals

Variable Step Thresholds SE Lower Upper z p

item2 t1 -0.394 0.072 -0.535 -0.252 -5.455 < .001


item2 t2 -0.134 0.070 -0.272 0.004 -1.897 0.058
item2 t3 -0.047 0.070 -0.185 0.091 -0.670 0.503
item2 t4 0.533 0.074 0.389 0.678 7.216 < .001

item4 t1 -0.524 0.074 -0.669 -0.380 -7.106 < .001


item4 t2 -0.343 0.072 -0.484 -0.203 -4.790 < .001
item4 t3 -0.261 0.071 -0.401 -0.122 -3.680 < .001
item4 t4 0.411 0.072 0.269 0.553 5.676 < .001

item5 t1 -0.645 0.076 -0.794 -0.497 -8.519 < .001


item5 t2 -0.552 0.074 -0.697 -0.406 -7.434 < .001
item5 t3 -0.489 0.073 -0.632 -0.345 -6.668 < .001
item5 t4 0.205 0.071 0.067 0.344 2.900 0.004

item6 t1 -0.385 0.072 -0.527 -0.244 -5.344 < .001


item6 t2 -0.110 0.070 -0.248 0.028 -1.563 0.118
item6 t3 -0.024 0.070 -0.161 0.114 -0.335 0.738
item6 t4 0.607 0.075 0.460 0.754 8.087 < .001

Additional outputs

Reliability indices

Variable α Ordinal α ω₁ ω₂ ω₃ AVE

Endogenous1 0.719 0.798 0.731 0.731 0.735 0.506

[6]

Path Model
Path diagrams
[7]

Referencias
[1] The jamovi project (2023). jamovi. (Version 2.4) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

[2] R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-
project.org. (R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2023-04-07).

[3] Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-
project.org/package=psych.

[4] Gallucci, M., Jentschke, S. (2021). SEMLj: jamovi SEM Analysis. [jamovi module]. For help please visit https://semlj.github.io/.

[5] Rosseel, Y. (2019). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. link.

[6] Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., Rosseel, Y., Miller, P., Quick, C., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Selig, J., Boulton, A., Preacher, K.,
Coffman, D., Rhemtulla, M., Robitzsch, A., Enders, C., Arslan, R., Clinton, B., Panko, P., Merkle, E., Chesnut, S., Byrnes, J., Rights, J. D., Longo, Y.,
Mansolf, M., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Rönkkö, M. (2019). semTools: Useful Tools for Structural Equation Modeling. [R Package]. Retrieved from
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools.

[7] Epskamp S. , Stuber S., Nak J., Veenman M,, Jorgensen T.D. (2019). semPlot: Path Diagrams and Visual Analysis of Various SEM Packages'
Output. [R Package]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot.
Overall Tests

Model tests

Label X² df p

User Model 25.8 18 0.105


Baseline Model 651.4 12 < .001
Scaled User 37.5 18 0.004
Scaled Baseline 532.5 12 < .001

Constraints score tests

Type Par 1 Par 2 X² df p

Univariate p2 == p36 1.3016 1 0.254


p3 == p37 2.5499 1 0.110
p4 == p38 0.0140 1 0.906
p5 == p39 3.5479 1 0.060
p6 == p40 1.3633 1 0.243
p7 == p41 0.3540 1 0.552
p8 == p42 1.6595 1 0.198
p9 == p43 1.1187 1 0.290
p10 == p44 0.0261 1 0.872
p11 == p45 0.0132 1 0.909
p12 == p46 0.3492 1 0.555
p13 == p47 0.1971 1 0.657
p14 == p48 0.4276 1 0.513
p15 == p49 0.1011 1 0.750
p16 == p50 2.3749 1 0.123
p17 == p51 0.1245 1 0.724
p18 == p52 3.9119 1 0.048
p19 == p53 6.5121 1 0.011
p20 == p54 1.1102 1 0.292

Total 20.8794 19 0.344

Nota. lavaan WARNING: se is not `standard'; not implemented yet; falling back to ordinary score test

Fit indices

95% Confidence Intervals

Type SRMR RMSEA Lower Upper RMSEA p

Classical 0.040 0.052 0.000 0.094 0.430


Robust 0.065
Scaled 0.065 0.083 0.045 0.120 0.074
User model versus baseline model

Model Scaled

Comparative Fit Index (CFI) 0.988 0.962


Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 0.992 0.975
Bentler-Bonett Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI) 0.992 0.975
Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI) 0.988 0.962
Bentler-Bonett Normed Fit Index (NFI)
Bollen's Relative Fit Index (RFI)
Bollen's Incremental Fit Index (IFI) 0.988 0.962
Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) 1.441 1.394

Additional fit indices

Model

Hoelter Critical N (CN), a=0.05 357.322


Hoelter Critical N (CN), a=0.01 430.588
Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) 0.979
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) 0.948
Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI) 0.400
McDonald Fit Index (MFI) 0.988
Expected Cross-Validation Index (ECVI) .
Loglikelihood user model (H0) .
Loglikelihood unrestricted model (H1) .
Akaike (AIC) .
Bayesian (BIC) .
Sample-size adjusted Bayesian (SABIC) .
CFI RMSEA SRMR Δ CFI Δ RMSEA Δ SRMR
M1 0.991 0.088 0.022
M2 0.997 0.04 0.025 0.006 -0.048 0.003
M3 0.962 0.083 0.065 -0.035 0.043 0.04
M4 0.962 0.083 0.065 0 0 0

También podría gustarte