Método de Precipitación

1. MÉTODO ARITMETICO

NUMERO PRECIPITACION
1 70
2 62
3 65
4 55
5 50
TOTAL 302

PRECIPITACION(mm) 60.4

2. MÉTODO DEL POLIGONO DE THIESSEN

NUMERO PRECIPITACION AREA A*Prec

1 70 678772.411 47514068.78
2 62 837566.707 51929135.83
3 65 516544.425 33575387.61
4 55 1858721.690 102229692.94
5 50 581649.212 29082460.62
TOTAL 4473254.445 264330745.78

PRECIPITACION(mm) 59.091

3. MÉTODO DE ISOYETAS

COTA (m.s.n.m.) AREA Longitud (Km)

53 1348122.0763 1348.12
59 1972793.5624 1972.79
66 811897.0541 811.90
63 302388.9335 302.39
4435201.63 4435.20

Pm = 54.503245871882

Intensidad

INTENSIDADES MAXIMAS (mm/h) ESTACION AUGUSTO WEBERBAUER

WEBERBAWER Departamento: CAJAMARCA

Altitud 2536.00 msnm Provincia: CAJAMARCA
Latitud: 07 º 10' 03'' S Longitud: 78 º 29' 35" W

Año 5 min 10 min 30 min 60 min 120 min

1973 101.00 71.00 24.00 14.00 11.00
1974 73.00 58.00 34.00 18.00 19.00
1975 90.00 50.00 24.00 16.00 10.00
1976 68.00 63.00 37.00 19.00 9.00
1977 65.00 53.00 37.00 21.00 11.00
1978 26.00 24.00 21.00 12.00 6.00
1979 60.00 60.00 38.00 23.00 14.00
1980 73.00 60.10 33.80 21.10 9.30
1981 67.20 54.80 29.10 15.50 13.00
1982 88.29 75.20 37.20 23.10 13.30
1983 75.30 50.40 31.40 23.70 14.00
1984 112.80 71.80 27.60 15.60 9.80
1985 59.31 54.40 25.60 14.70 8.10
1986 84.60 65.40 30.10 15.60 8.20
1987 76.00 49.20 21.60 13.20 8.00
1988 70.40 52.80 23.00 13.80 7.90
1989 73.60 47.80 28.00 16.00 9.60
1990 111.60 75.00 37.90 23.00 12.00
1991 83.00 73.00 41.00 26.00 14.00
1992 56.00 39.00 19.00 10.00 5.00
1993 58.00 51.00 28.00 18.00 10.00
1994 91.49 64.20 36.20 24.70 12.40
 1995 71.11 56.30 28.70 16.70 9.30
1996 81.30 60.20 32.40 17.90 11.10
1997 82.20 68.10 35.00 17.90 8.90
1998 92.00 66.30 40.60 27.10 13.50
1999 70.80 42.90 20.10 11.00 4.40
2003 27.26 17.80 8.20 5.40 4.00
2004 110.00 92.50 34.00 34.00 17.00
2005 6.67 6.30 5.20 3.90 3.20
2006 39.00 25.50 10.30 6.40 4.60
2007 15.43 15.40 5.50 2.80 2.30
2008 36.00 25.00 14.60 10.10 7.60
2009 85.50 51.20 29.40 17.00 8.80
2010 27.00 27.00 24.90 17.20 11.00
2011 16.50 15.00 9.20 7.10 5.30
2012 32.40 32.40 11.00 7.80 4.20

TRANSPOSICION DE INTENSIDADES (mm/hr)

MICRO CUENCA: 50 DEPARTAMENTO: CAJAMARCA

ALTITUD: 2536.00 PROVINCIA: CAJAMARCA
ALTITUD MEDIA: 2800.0000

𝑰_𝟐=𝑰_𝟏×𝑯_𝒎𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒂/𝑯_𝟏

Donde: I2 : Intensidad de la micro cuenca HMEDIA : De la micro cuenca

I1 : Intensidad de la est. Weberbawer H1 : Alt. de la est. Weberbawer

TABLA Nº 1: INTENSIDADES MAXIMAS TRANSPUESTAS A LA MICROCUENCA

m AÑO 5 10 30 60 120 5 10 30 60 120

1 1973 111.5 78.4 26.5 15.5 12.1 134.3 110.1 48.8 40.5 22.6
2 1974 80.6 64.0 37.5 19.9 21.0 132.8 89.5 48.3 32.3 20.2
3 1975 99.4 55.2 26.5 17.7 11.0 130.9 89.3 45.2 30.9 16.7
4 1976 75.1 69.6 40.9 21.0 9.9 120.2 86.9 45.1 29.4 16.7
5 1977 71.8 58.5 40.9 23.2 12.1 109.5 85.5 44.3 28.2 16.7
6 1978 28.7 26.5 23.2 13.2 6.6 108.9 84.5 44.0 27.5 16.1
7 1979 66.2 66.2 42.0 25.4 15.5 107.1 81.1 44.0 27.4 15.8
8 1980 80.6 66.4 37.3 23.3 10.3 105.1 78.9 43.1 27.4 15.5
9 1981 74.2 60.5 32.1 17.1 14.4 101.8 77.8 41.7 25.1 14.8
10 1982 97.5 83.0 41.1 25.5 14.7 100.7 76.4 40.5 25.0 14.3
11 1983 83.1 55.6 34.7 26.2 15.5 98.8 75.0 40.5 22.6 13.2
12 1984 124.5 79.3 30.5 17.2 10.8 97.8 71.7 40.2 21.4 13.1
13 1985 65.5 60.1 28.3 16.2 8.9 96.8 71.5 38.6 21.4 13.1
14 1986 93.4 72.2 33.2 17.2 9.1 90.5 71.4 37.4 21.3 13.1
15 1987 83.9 54.3 23.8 14.6 8.8 89.6 69.0 35.8 21.3 11.9
16 1988 77.7 58.3 25.4 15.2 8.7 87.6 67.0 35.0 20.5 11.9
17 1989 81.3 52.8 30.9 17.7 10.6 86.9 65.2 34.6 20.2 11.7
18 1990 123.2 82.8 41.8 25.4 13.2 86.9 64.8 34.2 19.9 11.4
19 1991 91.6 80.6 45.3 28.7 15.5 84.6 63.1 33.3 19.0 11.1
20 1992 61.8 43.1 21.0 11.0 5.5 84.3 62.9 33.3 19.0 11.1
21 1993 64.0 56.3 30.9 19.9 11.0 83.8 60.9 32.9 18.6 10.7
22 1994 101.0 70.9 40.0 27.3 13.7 80.9 60.7 30.5 18.6 10.6
23 1995 78.5 62.2 31.7 18.4 10.3 80.0 60.0 29.6 18.5 10.5
24 1996 89.8 66.5 35.8 19.8 12.3 77.4 59.5 28.6 17.5 9.8
25 1997 90.8 75.2 38.6 19.8 9.8 71.4 58.6 28.6 16.7 9.6
26 1998 101.6 73.2 44.8 29.9 14.9 70.6 56.9 27.4 16.4 9.5
27 1999 78.2 47.4 22.2 12.1 4.9 69.0 51.1 25.7 15.7 9.4
28 2003 30.1 19.7 9.1 6.0 4.4 66.7 46.4 25.0 14.3 9.0
29 2004 121.5 102.1 37.5 37.5 18.8 46.4 38.6 23.9 13.1 7.1
30 2005 7.4 7.0 5.7 4.3 3.5 42.9 32.1 22.6 12.0 6.3
31 2006 43.1 28.2 11.4 7.1 5.1 38.6 30.4 17.4 11.9 6.0
32 2007 17.0 17.0 6.1 3.1 2.5 32.4 29.8 13.1 9.3 5.5
33 2008 39.7 27.6 16.1 11.2 8.4 32.1 28.6 12.3 8.5 5.2
34 2009 94.4 56.5 32.5 18.8 9.7 30.9 21.2 11.0 7.6 5.0
35 2010 29.8 29.8 27.5 19.0 12.1 19.6 18.3 9.8 6.4 4.8
36 2011 18.2 16.6 10.2 7.8 5.9 18.4 17.9 6.5 4.6 3.8
37 2012 35.8 35.8 12.1 8.6 4.6 7.9 7.5 6.2 3.3 2.7
PROMEDIO 73.31 55.65 29.05 17.88 10.44 79.04 60.00 31.32 19.28 11.25
DESVIACION ESTANDAR 30.74 22.13 11.32 7.61 4.27 33.14 23.86 12.21 8.20 4.60

SELECCION DEL MODELO MATEMATICO

PARA EL MODELO MATEMATICO DE GUMBEL

PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE (SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV) (T = 5 min)

𝑭(𝒙)=𝒆^( 〖−𝒆〗 ^(−((𝒙−𝝁)/𝜶) ) )

Estimació n de los pará metros:

Para N = 37

𝑼=𝒙 ̅−𝜶𝝁_𝒚 𝟏/𝜶=𝝈_𝒚/𝑺

Donde:
X = 73.31 σy = 1.1339 uy = 0.5418
S = 30.74 α = 27.11 u = 58.62

TABLA Nº 2: PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV PARA 5 min.

P(X>x)=m/(N+1)
m I 5min P(X>x) Weibull 1-P(X>x) F(X < x) |P(X<x)-F(X < x)|
1 134.3 0.026 0.974 0.940 0.033
2 132.8 0.053 0.947 0.937 0.010
3 130.9 0.079 0.921 0.933 0.012
4 120.2 0.105 0.895 0.902 0.007
5 109.5 0.132 0.868 0.858 0.010
6 108.9 0.158 0.842 0.855 0.013
7 107.1 0.184 0.816 0.846 0.030
8 105.1 0.211 0.789 0.835 0.046
9 101.8 0.237 0.763 0.816 0.053
10 100.7 0.263 0.737 0.809 0.072
11 98.8 0.289 0.711 0.797 0.086
12 97.8 0.316 0.684 0.790 0.106
13 96.8 0.342 0.658 0.783 0.125
14 90.5 0.368 0.632 0.734 0.103
15 89.6 0.395 0.605 0.727 0.122
16 87.6 0.421 0.579 0.709 0.131
17 86.9 0.447 0.553 0.703 0.150
18 86.9 0.474 0.526 0.703 0.177
19 84.6 0.500 0.500 0.682 0.182
20 84.3 0.526 0.474 0.678 0.205
21 83.8 0.553 0.447 0.674 0.226
22 80.9 0.579 0.421 0.645 0.224
23 80.0 0.605 0.395 0.635 0.240
24 77.4 0.632 0.368 0.606 0.238
25 71.4 0.658 0.342 0.536 0.194
26 70.6 0.684 0.316 0.526 0.210
27 69.0 0.711 0.289 0.506 0.217
28 66.7 0.737 0.263 0.475 0.212
29 46.4 0.763 0.237 0.208 0.028
30 42.9 0.789 0.211 0.167 0.043
31 38.6 0.816 0.184 0.123 0.061
32 32.4 0.842 0.158 0.072 0.086
33 32.1 0.868 0.132 0.070 0.061
34 30.9 0.895 0.105 0.062 0.043
35 19.6 0.921 0.079 0.015 0.064
36 18.4 0.947 0.053 0.012 0.041
37 7.9 0.974 0.026 0.002 0.025
Δ max = 0.240

PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE (SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV) (T = 10 min)

Donde:
X = 55.65 σy = 1.1339 uy = 0.5418
S = 22.13 α = 19.52 u = 45.08

TABLA Nº 3: PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV PARA 10 min.

P(X>x)=m/(N+1)
m I 10min P(X>x) Weibull 1-P(X>x) F(X < x) |P(X<x)-F(X < x)|
1 110.1 0.026 0.974 0.965 0.009
2 89.5 0.053 0.947 0.902 0.045
3 89.3 0.079 0.921 0.901 0.020
4 86.9 0.105 0.895 0.889 0.005
5 85.5 0.132 0.868 0.881 0.013
6 84.5 0.158 0.842 0.876 0.034
7 81.1 0.184 0.816 0.854 0.038
8 78.9 0.211 0.789 0.838 0.049
9 77.8 0.237 0.763 0.830 0.067
10 76.4 0.263 0.737 0.818 0.081
11 75.0 0.289 0.711 0.806 0.095
12 71.7 0.316 0.684 0.774 0.090
13 71.5 0.342 0.658 0.773 0.115
14 71.4 0.368 0.632 0.772 0.140
15 69.0 0.395 0.605 0.746 0.141
16 67.0 0.421 0.579 0.723 0.144
17 65.2 0.447 0.553 0.700 0.148
18 64.8 0.474 0.526 0.694 0.168
19 63.1 0.500 0.500 0.672 0.172
20 62.9 0.526 0.474 0.669 0.195
21 60.9 0.553 0.447 0.642 0.194
22 60.7 0.579 0.421 0.638 0.217
23 60.0 0.605 0.395 0.628 0.233
24 59.5 0.632 0.368 0.621 0.252
25 58.6 0.658 0.342 0.606 0.264
26 56.9 0.684 0.316 0.579 0.264
27 51.1 0.711 0.289 0.479 0.190
28 46.4 0.737 0.263 0.393 0.130
29 38.6 0.763 0.237 0.248 0.011
30 32.1 0.789 0.211 0.144 0.067
31 30.4 0.816 0.184 0.119 0.065
32 29.8 0.842 0.158 0.112 0.046
33 28.6 0.868 0.132 0.097 0.034
34 21.2 0.895 0.105 0.033 0.072
35 18.3 0.921 0.079 0.020 0.059
36 17.9 0.947 0.053 0.018 0.035
37 7.5 0.974 0.026 0.001 0.025
Δ max = 0.264

PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE (SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV) (T = 30 min)

Donde:
X = 29.05 σy = 1.1339 uy = 0.5418
S = 11.32 α = 9.99 u = 23.64

TABLA Nº 4: PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV PARA 30 min.

P(X>x)=m/(N+1)
m I 30min P(X>x) Weibull 1-P(X>x) F(X < x) |P(X<x)-F(X < x)|
1 48.8 0.026 0.974 0.923 0.051
2 48.3 0.053 0.947 0.919 0.028
3 45.2 0.079 0.921 0.891 0.030
4 45.1 0.105 0.895 0.890 0.005
5 44.3 0.132 0.868 0.881 0.013
6 44.0 0.158 0.842 0.878 0.036
7 44.0 0.184 0.816 0.878 0.063
8 43.1 0.211 0.789 0.867 0.078
9 41.7 0.237 0.763 0.848 0.085
10 40.5 0.263 0.737 0.831 0.094
11 40.5 0.289 0.711 0.831 0.120
12 40.2 0.316 0.684 0.827 0.143
13 38.6 0.342 0.658 0.799 0.141
14 37.4 0.368 0.632 0.777 0.145
15 35.8 0.395 0.605 0.744 0.139
16 35.0 0.421 0.579 0.726 0.147
17 34.6 0.447 0.553 0.717 0.165
18 34.2 0.474 0.526 0.706 0.179
19 33.3 0.500 0.500 0.685 0.185
20 33.3 0.526 0.474 0.685 0.211
21 32.9 0.553 0.447 0.672 0.225
22 30.5 0.579 0.421 0.604 0.183
23 29.6 0.605 0.395 0.578 0.183
24 28.6 0.632 0.368 0.543 0.175
25 28.6 0.658 0.342 0.543 0.201
26 27.4 0.684 0.316 0.503 0.187
27 25.7 0.711 0.289 0.444 0.154
28 25.0 0.737 0.263 0.418 0.155
29 23.9 0.763 0.237 0.378 0.142
30 22.6 0.789 0.211 0.330 0.120
31 17.4 0.816 0.184 0.154 0.030
32 13.1 0.842 0.158 0.056 0.101
33 12.3 0.868 0.132 0.044 0.088
 34 11.0 0.895 0.105 0.028 0.077
35 9.8 0.921 0.079 0.018 0.061
36 6.5 0.947 0.053 0.004 0.049
37 6.2 0.974 0.026 0.003 0.023
Δ max = 0.225

PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE (SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV) (T = 60 min)

Donde:
X = 17.88 σy = 1.1339 uy = 0.5418
S = 7.61 α = 6.71 u = 14.25

TABLA Nº 5: PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV PARA 60 min.

P(X>x)=m/(N+1)
m I 60min P(X>x) Weibull 1-P(X>x) F(X < x) |P(X<x)-F(X < x)|
1 40.5 0.026 0.974 0.980 0.006
2 32.3 0.053 0.947 0.934 0.013
3 30.9 0.079 0.921 0.920 0.001
4 29.4 0.105 0.895 0.901 0.006
5 28.2 0.132 0.868 0.883 0.014
6 27.5 0.158 0.842 0.870 0.028
7 27.4 0.184 0.816 0.868 0.052
8 27.4 0.211 0.789 0.868 0.079
9 25.1 0.237 0.763 0.820 0.057
10 25.0 0.263 0.737 0.818 0.081
11 22.6 0.289 0.711 0.750 0.040
12 21.4 0.316 0.684 0.710 0.025
13 21.4 0.342 0.658 0.710 0.052
14 21.3 0.368 0.632 0.705 0.074
15 21.3 0.395 0.605 0.705 0.100
16 20.5 0.421 0.579 0.673 0.094
17 20.2 0.447 0.553 0.664 0.111
18 19.9 0.474 0.526 0.649 0.123
19 19.0 0.500 0.500 0.613 0.113
20 19.0 0.526 0.474 0.613 0.139
21 18.6 0.553 0.447 0.591 0.144
22 18.6 0.579 0.421 0.591 0.170
23 18.5 0.605 0.395 0.586 0.191
24 17.5 0.632 0.368 0.540 0.172
25 16.7 0.658 0.342 0.498 0.156
26 16.4 0.684 0.316 0.485 0.170
27 15.7 0.711 0.289 0.448 0.158
28 14.3 0.737 0.263 0.370 0.107
29 13.1 0.763 0.237 0.305 0.068
30 12.0 0.789 0.211 0.248 0.038
31 11.9 0.816 0.184 0.242 0.058
32 9.3 0.842 0.158 0.123 0.035
33 8.5 0.868 0.132 0.093 0.038
34 7.6 0.895 0.105 0.068 0.037
35 6.4 0.921 0.079 0.040 0.038
36 4.6 0.947 0.053 0.015 0.037
37 3.3 0.974 0.026 0.006 0.020
Δ max = 0.191

PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE (SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV) (T = 120 min)

Donde:
X = 10.44 σy = 1.1339 uy = 0.5418
S = 4.27 α = 3.76 u = 8.40

TABLA Nº 6: PRUEBA DE BONDAD DE AJUSTE SMIRNOV - KOLMOGOROV PARA 120 min.

P(X>x)=m/(N+1)
m I 120min P(X>x) Weibull 1-P(X>x) F(X < x) |P(X<x)-F(X < x)|
1 22.6 0.026 0.974 0.977 0.004
2 20.2 0.053 0.947 0.958 0.010
3 16.7 0.079 0.921 0.895 0.026
4 16.7 0.105 0.895 0.895 0.000
5 16.7 0.132 0.868 0.895 0.026
6 16.1 0.158 0.842 0.878 0.036
7 15.8 0.184 0.816 0.870 0.055
8 15.5 0.211 0.789 0.859 0.069
9 14.8 0.237 0.763 0.832 0.068
10 14.3 0.263 0.737 0.811 0.074
11 13.2 0.289 0.711 0.757 0.047
12 13.1 0.316 0.684 0.750 0.066
13 13.1 0.342 0.658 0.750 0.092
14 13.1 0.368 0.632 0.750 0.119
15 11.9 0.395 0.605 0.674 0.069
16 11.9 0.421 0.579 0.674 0.095
17 11.7 0.447 0.553 0.657 0.105
18 11.4 0.474 0.526 0.639 0.113
19 11.1 0.500 0.500 0.612 0.112
20 11.1 0.526 0.474 0.612 0.138
21 10.7 0.553 0.447 0.582 0.135
22 10.6 0.579 0.421 0.572 0.151
23 10.5 0.605 0.395 0.562 0.167
24 9.8 0.632 0.368 0.498 0.130
25 9.6 0.658 0.342 0.487 0.145
26 9.5 0.684 0.316 0.476 0.160
27 9.4 0.711 0.289 0.465 0.176
28 9.0 0.737 0.263 0.431 0.168
29 7.1 0.763 0.237 0.247 0.011
30 6.3 0.789 0.211 0.175 0.035
31 6.0 0.816 0.184 0.147 0.037
32 5.5 0.842 0.158 0.114 0.044
33 5.2 0.868 0.132 0.099 0.033
34 5.0 0.895 0.105 0.085 0.021
35 4.8 0.921 0.079 0.072 0.007
36 3.8 0.947 0.053 0.034 0.019
37 2.7 0.974 0.026 0.011 0.015
Δ max = 0.176

CUADRO RESUMEN

WEIBULL ( ∆C MAX) 0.240 0.264 0.225 0.191 0.176

DURACION DE INTENSIDAD 5 10 30 60 120

Cálculo del Do Critico

Do = 1.36 /( N )^0.5 = 0.22

 Si los Dcmáx < Do , entonces los datos se ajustan al modelo de Gumbel.

𝒙=𝝁−𝜶(ln⁡(−(ln⁡(1−1/𝑇) )) )

TABLA Nº 7: PARAMETROS PARA MODELO GUMBELL

5MIN 10MIN 30MIN 60MIN 120MIN

PARAMETRO MAX MAX MAX MAX MAX
PROMEDIO 73.31 55.65 29.05 17.88 10.44
DESV ESTA. 30.74 22.13 11.32 7.61 4.27
ALPHA 27.11 19.52 9.99 6.71 3.76
U 58.62 45.08 23.64 14.25 8.40

TABLA Nº 8: CALCULO PARA DE LAS INTENSIDADES PARA UN TIEMPO DE RETORNO DE 10 AÑOS

TR = 10 años
5min 10min 30min 60min 120min
Max. Max. Max. Max. Max.
119.63 89.00 46.12 29.35 16.87

TABLA Nº 9: CURVA INTENSIDAD - DURACION -TIEMPO DE RETORNO

Tiempo (Min.) Intensidades (m.m)

5 119.629
10 89.000
30 46.117 300.962
60 29.348
120 16.868

TABLA Nº 10: CALCULO PARA DE LAS INTENSIDADES PARA UN TIEMPO DE RETORNO DE 50 AÑOS

TR = 50 años
5min 10min 30min 60min 120min
Max. Max. Max. Max. Max.
164.40 121.23 62.61 40.43 23.08

TABLA Nº 11: CURVA INTENSIDAD - DURACION -TIEMPO DE RETORNO

Tiempo (Min.) Intensidades (m.m)

5 164.402
10 121.234
30 62.612 411.762
60 40.431
120 23.083

TABLA Nº 12: CALCULO PARA DE LAS INTENSIDADES PARA UN TIEMPO DE RETORNO DE 100 AÑOS

TR = 100 años
5min 10min 30min 60min 120min
Max. Max. Max. Max. Max.
183.33 134.86 69.59 45.12 25.71

TABLA Nº 13: CURVA INTENSIDAD - DURACION -TIEMPO DE RETORNO

Tiempo (Min.) Intensidades (m.m)

5 183.330
10 134.861
30 69.585 458.603
60 45.116
120 25.711

Intensidad- Duracion Frecuencia

200.000
f(x) = 530.38373157126 x^-0.614618061309715
180.000
f(x) = 476.343107462328 x^-0.61469398818269
160.000
140.000
Intensidad(mm)

120.000 f(x) = 348.507288349698 x^-0.614967660823269

100.000
80.000
60.000

40.000
20.000
0.000
ECUACIÓN DE AJUSTE DE LA CURVA 40
0 20 60 80 100 120 140
Tiempo(min)

y = 513.56x-0.61510 Power (10)

= 50
y = 513.56Tc
Power (50) 100
-0.615
Power (100) Power (100)

Donde:
I = Intensidad
Tc = Tiempo de concentració n

TIEMPO DE CONCENTRACION

𝒕_𝒄=𝟎.𝟎𝟏𝟗𝟓×(𝑳^𝟑/𝑯)^(𝟎.𝟑𝟖𝟓)

L: Longitud de recorrido de cauce principal en metros.

H: Diferencia de elevació n entre los punto extremos del cauce principal en metro.

L = 36.11 m COTAMAYOR = 3350 m.s.n.m

H = 600.00 m COTAMENOR = 2750 m.s.n.m

𝑡_𝑐=0.0195∗( 〖 2817.40 〗 ^3/600)^0.385

Tc= 16.03 min

Resolviendo la ecuacion Y tenemos:

 Tr = 10 años y = 571.82x-0.615 I= 94.00 mm/h
Tr = 50 años y = 513.56x-0.615 I= 93.23 mm/h
Tr = 100 años y = 375.74x-0.615 I= 68.21 mm/h

MÉTODO RACIONAL

1. Método racional clásico :

𝑄=𝐶𝑥𝐼𝑥𝐴/3.6

a) Determinación del coeficiente de escorrentía ( C )

Tabla para determinar los coeficientes de escorrentía :

Covertura Tipo de suelo Coeficiente (C) Área

Sin vegetación Semipermeable 0.65 1455308.2246

Cultivos Semipermeable 0.55 955818.7226

Pendiente de la cuenca de estudio :

Bosques Semipermeable 0.4 3376716.4292

P= 29.43%

La pendiente es alta ya que 34.70% > 20%

C 0.488

b) Determinación del tiempo de concetracion (Tc)

𝑇𝑐=0.0195 ∗ 〖 (𝐿^3/𝐻) 〗 ^0.385

Datos :
L= 36.11 m m
Tc 0
H= 600.00 m m

C) Determinación de la intensidad de lluvia para TR = 50 años

Tr = 10 años y = 571.82x-0.615 I= 94.00 mm/h

Tr = 50 años y = 513.56x-0.615 I= 93.23 mm/h
Tr = 100 años y = 375.74x-0.615 I= 68.21 mm/h

Caudal: Área de la cuenca : 562.9137 km^2

10 años
 𝑄=𝐶𝑥𝐼𝑥𝐴/3.6
7167.639 m^3/s

50 años

𝑄=𝐶𝑥𝐼𝑥𝐴/3.6
7108.673 m^3/s

100 años

𝑄=𝐶𝑥𝐼𝑥𝐴/3.6
5200.975 m^3/s