Texto Sep Cap7 Guizada

Sistemas Eléctricos de Potencia








Ing. Max Guizada Sainz

𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑉; 𝛿 𝑃 = 0; 𝑄 = 0
𝑃 ;𝑉 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑄; 𝛿 𝑃 ;𝑉
Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 2

𝑉; 𝛿 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝛿
𝑉𝑦𝛿
𝛿=0
𝛿

∆𝑃 ∆𝑃
≫>
∆𝛿 ∆𝑉


𝑃 𝐵 𝐵 𝐵 ⋯ 𝐵 𝛿
⎡𝑃 ⎤ ⎡𝐵 ⎤ ⎡𝛿 ⎤
𝐵
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎢𝑃 ⎥ = − ⎢𝐵 𝐵 ⎥ ⎢𝛿 ⎥
⎢⋮ ⎥ ⎢ ⋮ ⋱ ⎥⎢ ⋮ ⎥
⎣𝑃 ⎦ ⎣𝐵 𝐵 ⎦ ⎣𝛿 ⎦
𝐵 =𝐵

[𝑃 ]( ) = −[𝐵]( ) ( ) [𝛿 ]( )
[𝛿 ] = −[𝐵 ] [𝑃 ]
𝑃 =𝐵 𝛿 −𝛿
𝛿 =0
𝑃 = 𝑃 − 𝑃
𝑟 ≪< 𝑥

Para el sistema que se muestra en la figura:
a. Determinar la matriz de suceptancias nodales.

b. Determinar el flujo de potencia activa.
c. Dibujar el flujograma correspondiente.
𝑃 = 𝑃 − 𝑃 = 0.283 − 0.15 = 0.133
𝑃 = 100𝑀𝑊

𝑃 = 13.3𝑀𝑊
1
𝑏 =
𝑥
𝒊 𝒋 𝑿 𝟏
𝑩=
𝑿
𝑁𝑜𝑑𝑜 1 → 𝑆𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑑𝑜 1.

𝐵 = 0.7968 + 1.6584 + 2.9240 + 1.0607 = 6.439834
𝐵 = 0.7968 + 2.3364 = 3.1332
𝐵 = 1.6584 + 2.3364 = 3.9948
𝐵 = 2.9240 + 4.9751 = 7.8991
𝐵 = 4.9751 + 0.7320 = 5.7071
𝐵 = 0.7320 + 3.9840 = 4.7161
𝐵 = 3.9840 + 5.5249 = 9.5089
𝐵 = 5.5249 + 1.0607 = 6.5855
𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜 → 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎
𝐵 = −0.796813
𝐵 = −1.658375
𝐵 = −2.9240
𝐵 = −1.0607
𝐵 = −2.3364
𝐵 = −4.9751
𝐵 = −0.7320

𝐵 = −3.9840
𝐵 = −5.5249
𝐵 =0
[𝐵] =
𝐵 =𝐵
[𝐵] =
𝑃 =𝑃 −𝑃
𝑃
⎡𝑃 ⎤ ⎡−0.003⎤
⎢ ⎥ ⎢−0.120⎥
𝑃
⎢ ⎥ ⎢−0.040⎥
[𝑃] = ⎢𝑃 ⎥=⎢ 0 ⎥
⎢𝑃 ⎥ ⎢ 0.150 ⎥
⎢𝑃 ⎥ ⎢ −0.05 ⎥
⎣𝑃 ⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦
[𝛿 ] = −[𝐵 ] [𝑃 ]

𝛿
⎡ ⎤ 0.038324
𝛿 ⎡ 0.1194 ⎤
⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0.09581 ⎥
⎢𝛿 ⎥
[𝛿] = ⎢𝛿 ⎢ ⎥
⎥ = −0.000352
⎢ −0.02811 ⎥
⎢𝛿 ⎥
⎢ 0.06966 ⎥
⎢𝛿 ⎥
⎣ 0.004046 ⎦
⎣𝛿 ⎦
𝑃 =𝐵 𝛿 −𝛿
𝛿 =0
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −0.796813(0.038324 − 0.1194) = 0.0646𝑝𝑢 → 6.46𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −1.658375(0.038324 − 0.09581) = 0.0953 → 9.53𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −2.9240(0.038324 − −0.000352) = −0.1223 → −12.23𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −1.0607(0.038324 − 0) = −0.0406 → −4.06𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −2.3364(0.1194 − 0.09581) = −0.0551 → −5.51𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −4.9751(−0.000352 − −0.02811) = −0.1224 → −12.24𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −0.7320(−0.02811 − 0.06966) = 0.0276 → 2.76𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −3.9840(0.06966 − 0.004046) = −0.0224 → −2.24𝑀𝑊
𝑃 = 𝐵 (𝛿 −𝛿 ) = −5.5249(0.004046 − 0) = −0.0224 → −2.24𝑀𝑊
𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑗𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑑𝑜 = 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑗𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑑𝑜

13.3
4,06
0.3
8
1
6,46
12,24 7 2,24
7
9,53
2
4 2,24
12,24
11,97 5,51
3
6
2,76
[MW] 4 15 5 5

(RESOLUCION DEL PROBLEMA: METODO DC)
DESCRIPCION: SISTEMA DE 8 BARRAS
Power World

SEP 600 – SISTEMAS ELECTRICOS DE POTENCIA

FLUJO DE POTENCIA
(METODO DC)
1. Para el sistema que se muestra en la figura, utilizando el método DC:
a. Determinar la matriz de suceptancias nodales.

b. Determinar el flujo de potencia activa considerando que es liberada la carga del nodo
PQ.
c. Dibujar el flujograma correspondiente al inciso b) indicando el flujo entre nodos.
Power
World.


Capacidad efectiva (Oferta)
Indisponibilidades
forzadas y programadas
Capacidad disponible
Reserva rotante
Reserva fría (7% -21,5%)
Perdidas por
transporte (5,2%)
Demanda
máxima
00:15 02:15 04:15 06:15 08:15 10:15 12:15 14:15 16:15 18:15 20:15 22:15

80MW
1 4 2
60MW 50MW
1% 2%
40MW 25MW
2% 2%
100MW 20MW
𝑂𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 = 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 = 𝑃 [𝑀𝑊 ] = 60 + 50 + 100 = 210𝑀𝑊
𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 = 𝑃 [𝑀𝑊 ] = 40 + 25 + 20 + 80 = 165𝑀𝑊

80MW
1 4 2
60MW 50MW
1% 2%
40MW 25MW
2% 2%
100MW 20MW
∆𝑃 = 60𝑀𝑊 ∗ 0.01 = 0.6𝑀𝑊

∆𝑃 = 50𝑀𝑊 ∗ 0.02 = 1𝑀𝑊
∆𝑃 = 100𝑀𝑊 ∗ 0.02 = 2𝑀𝑊
∆𝑃 = 100𝑀𝑊 ∗ 0.02 = 2𝑀𝑊
∆𝑃 = ∆𝑃 = 5.6𝑀𝑊
𝐷 =𝐷 + ∆𝑃 = 165 + 5.6 = 170.6𝑀𝑊
𝐶 =𝐷 ∗ 𝑅 = 170.6 ∗ 1.07 = 182.4𝑀𝑊
𝑅 = 𝑂𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 − 𝐶 . = 210 − 182.4 = 27.6𝑀𝑊

𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 = 100𝑀𝑊 → 𝐻𝑜𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 (𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎)

𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠 = 60𝑀𝑊 → 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑜 (𝑈𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑜)
𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒ñ𝑎𝑠 = 50𝑀𝑊 → 𝑈𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜 (𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎)
80MW
1 59.4MW 4 20.6MW 2
60MW 7.6MW
0.6MW* 0.4MW
40MW 25MW
0.8MW 0.8MW*
40MW 38.4MW
100MW 20MW


FLUJO DE POTENCIA
(METODO APROXIMADO)
100MW
1 4 2
60MW 50MW
1% 3%
35MW 25MW
50MW
1% 8%
100MW 20MW

𝜀
|𝑥 − 𝑥 |≤𝜀→0
∗
𝑆
= 𝑌 𝑉
𝑉
𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑉; 𝛿
𝑃 ;𝑉 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑄 ;𝛿
𝑉; 𝛿 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑃 ;𝑄

∗
𝑆
= 𝑌 𝑉 + 𝑌 𝑉 + 𝑌 𝑉 + ⋯+ 𝑌 𝑉 + ⋯+ 𝑌 𝑉
𝑉
𝑉
∗
𝑆 1
𝑉 = − 𝑌 𝑉 − 𝑌 𝑉 − 𝑌 𝑉 − ⋯− 𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌
⎡ ∗ ⎤
𝑆 1
𝑉 = ⎢⎢ − 𝑌 𝑉 ⎥⎥
⎢ 𝑉 ⎥𝑌
⎣ ⎦
∗
𝑆 =𝑉 𝑌 𝑉 = 𝑃 −𝑃 +𝑗 𝑄 −𝑄 → 𝑄 = 𝐼𝑚(𝑆 )
∗
𝑆 =𝑉 𝑌 𝑉
𝑆 = 𝑃 −𝑃 +𝑗 𝑄 −𝑄

∗
𝑆
= 𝑌 𝑉
𝑉

𝑆 = 100 𝑀𝑉𝐴
𝑉 = 69 𝑘𝑉 𝑆 = 0.10 + 𝑗0.05 𝑦 = 9.95∠ − 85°
𝑆 = 0.25 + 𝑗0.11 𝑦
= 7 ∗ 10 ∠90°
2
𝑦
𝑦 + −𝑦 𝑌 𝑌
[𝑌] = 2 =
𝑦 𝑌 𝑌
−𝑦 𝑦 +
2
[𝑌] 9.9493∠ − 84.9996° 9.9500∠95.00°

=
9.9500∠95.00° 9.9493∠ − 84.9996°

𝑃 = 0; 𝑄 =0 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑉;𝛿
1∠0°
𝑉 ∠𝛿 = 1∠0° 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑃 ;𝑄
∗ ∗
𝑆 1 ( ) 𝑆 1
𝑉 = −𝑌 𝑉 →𝑉 = ( )
−𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌 𝑉 𝑌
𝑆
𝑆 = 𝑃 −𝑃 +𝑗 𝑄 −𝑄 → 𝑆 (𝑃𝑄) = 0 → 𝑆 = −𝑆
𝑆 = −0.25 − 𝐽0.11 = 0.27313∠ − 156.2505°

𝑉
( )
𝑉 = 1∠0°
𝑉 = 𝑉 = 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 = 1∠0°
∗
( ) 𝑆 1
𝑉 = ( )
−𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌
𝑘=1
∗
( ) 𝑆 1
𝑉 = ( )
−𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌
∗
( ) 0.27313∠ − 156.2505° 1
𝑉 = − 9.9500∠95.00° ∗ 1∠0°
1∠0° 9.9493∠ − 84.9996°
( )
𝑉 = 0.98716∠ − 1.397°

𝑘=2
∗
( ) 𝑆 1
𝑉 = ( )
−𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌
∗
( ) 0.27313∠ − 156.2505° 1
𝑉 = − 9.9500∠95.00° ∗ 1∠0°
0.98716∠ − 1.397° 9.9493∠ − 84.9996°
( )
𝑉 = 0.9864∠ − 1.3973°
𝑘=3
∗
( ) 𝑆 1
𝑉 = ( )
−𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌
∗
( ) 0.27313∠ − 156.2505° 1
𝑉 = − 9.9500∠95.00° ∗ 1∠0°
0.9864∠ − 1.3973° 9.9493∠ − 84.9996°
( )
𝑉 = 0.986387∠ − 1.398468°
𝑘=4
∗
( ) 𝑆 1
𝑉 = ( )
−𝑌 𝑉
𝑉 𝑌
∗
( ) 0.27313∠ − 156.2505° 1
𝑉 = − 9.9500∠95.00° ∗ 1∠0°
0.986387∠ − 1.398468° 9.9493∠ − 84.9996°
( )
𝑉 = 0.986386∠ − 1.3985°
|0.986386∠ − 1.3985° − 0.986387∠ − 1.398468°| ≤ 𝜀
𝜀 = 0.000001
𝑆 =𝑆 −𝑆
( )
𝑆 =𝑉 𝑌 ∗𝑉 +𝑌 ∗ 𝑉
𝑆 = 1∠0°(9.9493∠ − 84.9996° ∗ 1∠0° + 9.9500∠95.00° ∗ 0.986386∠ − 1.3985°)

𝑆 = 0.276344∠24.8829° = 0.25069 + 𝑗0.11627

→ 𝑃𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑦𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎 1
0.25069 = 𝑃 − 0.10 𝑃 = 0.35069

𝑆 = 𝑃 −𝑃 +𝑗 𝑄 −𝑄 → →
0.11627 = 𝑄 − 0.05 𝑄 = 0.16627
𝑦 ∗
𝑆 = 𝑉 ∗ 𝐼∗ = 𝑉 𝑉 −𝑉 𝑦 +𝑉
2
∗
( ) 𝑦
𝑆 =𝑉 𝑉 − 𝑉 𝑦 +𝑉
2
𝑆 = 1∠0°[(1∠0° − 0.986386∠ − 1.3985°)9.95∠ − 85° + 1∠0° ∗ 7 ∗ 10 ∠90°]∗

𝑆 = 0.276335∠24.8843° = 0.250679 + 𝑗0.11627
25.07
25.00 1 35.07
2
[MW]
10.00
11.63
16.63
11.00 2
1
[MVAr]
5.00
𝑆 ≠𝑆
∗
( ) ( ) ( )𝑦
𝑆 =𝑉 𝑉 −𝑉 𝑦 +𝑉
2
𝑆 = 0.9864∠
− 1.398°[(0.9864∠ − 1.398° − 1∠0°)9.95∠ − 85° + 0.9864∠ − 1.398°
∗ 7 ∗ 10 ∠90°]∗
𝑆 = 0.27314∠153.4543° = −0.244346 + 𝑗0.12207

∆𝑆 = 𝑆 +𝑆 = 0.250679 + 𝑗0.11627 − 0.244346 + 𝑗0.12207 = 0.006333 + 𝑗0.0094
𝑃 = 0.06333𝑀𝑊
𝑄 = 0.94𝑀𝑉𝐴𝑟

(RESOLUCION DEL PROBLEMA: METODO GAUSS SEIDEL)
DESCRIPCION: SISTEMA DE 2 BARRAS (PQ- SLACK)



FLUJO DE POTENCIA
(METODO GAUSS SEIDEL)
𝑆 = 150 𝑀𝑉𝐴
𝑉 = 115 𝑘𝑉 𝑆 = 0.10 + 𝑗0.05 Ω
𝑥 = 0.4
𝑆 = 0.25 + 𝑗0.11 𝐾𝑚
Ω
𝑅 = 0.03
𝐾𝑚
𝑥 . = 0.3𝑀𝛺 − 𝐾𝑚
𝑅 𝑥 𝑦
2

𝜀
|𝑥 − 𝑥 |≤𝜀→0
𝑆 = 𝑉 𝐼∗
𝑃 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝑄 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃

𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑃
𝑃 −𝑃 ∆𝛿
= 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉
𝑄 −𝑄 𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄 ∆𝑉
𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉
𝛿 𝛿 ∆𝛿
= +
𝑉 𝑉 ∆𝑉
[∆𝑃, ∆𝑄] 𝑃
𝑃 ,𝑄
𝐷𝑖𝑚 = #𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑉 + 2#𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑄
𝜕𝑃
=− 𝑉 𝑉 𝑌 sen 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑃
= 𝑉 𝑉 𝑌 sen 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑃
= 2𝑉 𝑌 cos −𝜃 + 𝑉 𝑌 cos 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑃
= 𝑉 𝑌 cos 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑄
= 𝑉 𝑉 𝑌 cos 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
= −𝑉 𝑉 𝑌 cos 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
= 2𝑉 𝑌 sen −𝜃 + 𝑉 𝑌 sen 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑄
= 𝑉 𝑌 sen 𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝑄
𝑃 ,𝑄

𝑆 = 100 𝑀𝑉𝐴
|𝑉 | = 1.05 𝑃 = 48𝑀𝑊 𝑟 = 0.005
𝛿 = 0° 𝑄 = 25𝑀𝑉𝐴𝑟 𝑥 = 0.018
𝑦
= 0.0008
2
𝑦
𝑦 + −𝑦 𝑌 𝑌
[𝑌] = 2 =
𝑦 𝑌 𝑌
−𝑦 𝑦 +
2
𝑦 1
𝑌 =𝑌 =𝑦 + = + 0.0008𝑗 = 14.3266 − 51.5751𝑗
2 0.005 + 0.018𝑗
1
𝑌 = 𝑌 = −𝑦 =− = −14.3266 + 51.5759𝑗
0.005 + 0.018𝑗

14.3266 − 51.5751𝑗 −14.3266 + 51.5759𝑗

[𝑌] =
−14.3266 + 51.5759𝑗 14.3266 − 51.5751𝑗
[𝑌] 53.5280∠ − 74.4756° 53.5288∠105.5241°

=
53.5288∠105.5241° 53.5280∠ − 74.4756°
𝑃 = 0; 𝑄 =0 𝑃 ;𝑄 𝑉;𝛿
1∠0°
𝑉 ∠𝛿 = 1.05∠0° 𝑃 = 0; 𝑃 ;𝑄
𝑄 =0
𝐷𝑖𝑚 = #𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑉 + 2#𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑄 = 0 + 2 ∗ 1 = 2 → 𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑧 𝑑𝑒 2𝑥2
𝑃 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos(𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃 ) + 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos(−𝜃 )
𝑄 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen(𝛿 − 𝛿 − 𝜃 ) + 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen(−𝜃 )
𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑃
⎡ ⎤
𝑃 −𝑃 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉 ∆𝛿
=⎢ ⎥
𝑄 −𝑄 ⎢𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄 ⎥ ∆𝑉
⎣ 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉 ⎦
𝛿 𝛿 ∆𝛿
= +
𝑉 𝑉 ∆𝑉

𝑉 = 1∠0°
𝑃 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃 +𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos(−𝜃 )
𝑃 = 53.5288 ∗ 1 ∗ 1.05 cos(0 − 0 − 105.5241°) + 53.5280 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 cos(74.4756°)
𝑘 = 1 → 𝑃 = −0.71623
𝑄 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃 +𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen(−𝜃 )
𝑄 = 53.5288 ∗ 1 ∗ 1.05 sen(0 − 0 − 105.5241°) + 53.5280 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 sen(74.4756°)
𝑘 = 1 → 𝑄 = −2.57964
𝜕𝑃
= 2𝑉 𝑌 cos(−𝜃 ) + 𝑌 𝑉 cos 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑃
= 2 ∗ 1 ∗ 53.5280 cos(74.4756°) + 53.5288 ∗ 1.05 cos(0 − 0 − 105.5241°)
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑃
𝑘=1→ = 13.610424
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑃
= −𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑃
= −53.5288 ∗ 1 ∗ 1.05 sen(0 − 0 − 105.5241°)
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑃
𝑘=1→ = 54.154758
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
= 2𝑉 𝑌 sen(−𝜃 ) + 𝑉 𝑌 sen 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑄
= 2 ∗ 1 ∗ 53.5280 sen(74.4756°) + 1.05 ∗ 53.5288 sen(0 − 0 − 105.5241°)
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑄
𝑘=1→ = 49.995470
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑄
=𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
= 53.5288 ∗ 1 ∗ 1.05 cos(0 − 0 − 105.5241°)
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
𝑘=1→ = −15.042977
𝜕𝛿

𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑃 𝜕𝑃
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
𝑃 −𝑃 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉 ∆𝛿 ∆𝛿 ⎛ 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉 ⎞ 𝑃 −𝑃
=⎢ ⎥ → = ⎜⎢ ⎥
⎟
𝑄 −𝑄 ⎢𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄 ⎥ ∆𝑉 ∆𝑉 ⎢𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄 ⎥ 𝑄 −𝑄
⎣ 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉 ⎦ ⎝⎣ 𝜕𝛿 𝜕𝑉 ⎦ ⎠
∆𝛿 54.154758 13.610424 −0.48 + 0.716227 −0.007044 −0.4036°

= = =
∆𝑉 −15.042977 48.995470 −0.25 + 2.579644 0.04538 0.04538
𝛿 𝛿 ∆𝛿
= +
𝑉 𝑉 ∆𝑉
𝛿 0 −0.4036° −0.4036°
𝑘=1→ = + =
𝑉 1 0.04538 1.04538
𝑃 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃 +𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos(−𝜃 )
𝑘 = 2 → 𝑃 = −0.4675
𝑄 = 𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃 +𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen(−𝜃 )
𝑘 = 2 → 𝑄 = −0.1378
𝜕𝑃
= 2𝑉 𝑌 cos(−𝜃 ) + 𝑌 𝑉 cos 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑃
𝑘=2→ = 14.529618
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑃
= −𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 sen 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑃
𝑘=2→ = 56.500124
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
= 2𝑉 𝑌 sen(−𝜃 ) + 𝑉 𝑌 sen 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝑉
𝜕𝑄
𝑘=2→ = 53.783736
𝜕𝑉

𝜕𝑄
=𝑌 𝑉 𝑉 cos 𝛿 −𝛿 −𝜃
𝜕𝛿
𝜕𝑄
𝑘=2→ = −16.124019
𝜕𝛿
∆𝛿 56.500124 14.529618 −0.48 + 0.4675 0.0002926 0.01676°

= = =
∆𝑉 −16.124019 53.783736 −0.25 + 0.1378 −0.001998 −0.001998
𝛿 𝛿 ∆𝛿
= +
𝑉 𝑉 ∆𝑉
𝛿 −0.4036° 0.01676° −0.3868°
𝑘=2→ = + =
𝑉 1.04538 −0.001998 1.04308

(RESOLUCION DEL PROBLEMA: METODO NEWTON RAPHSON)
DESCRIPCION: SISTEMA DE 2 BARRAS (PQ- SLACK)



FLUJO DE POTENCIA
(METODO NEWTON RAPHSON)
𝑆 = 150 𝑀𝑉𝐴
|𝑉 | = 1.05 𝑃 = 50𝑀𝑊 𝑟 = 0.004
𝛿 = 0° 𝑄 = 20𝑀𝑉𝐴𝑟 𝑥 = 0.025
𝑦
= 0.0009
2


(TEORIA)

Texto Sep Cap7 Guizada

Cargado por

Información del documento

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Texto Sep Cap7 Guizada

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Sistemas Eléctricos de Potencia

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 2

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 3

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 4

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 5

Para el sistema que se muestra en la figura:

a. Determinar la matriz de suceptancias nodales.

𝑃 = 𝑃 − 𝑃 = 0.283 − 0.15 = 0.133

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 6

𝑁𝑜𝑑𝑜 1 → 𝑆𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑑𝑜 1.

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 7

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 8

𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑗𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑑𝑜 = 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑗𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑑𝑜

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 9

(RESOLUCION DEL PROBLEMA: METODO DC)

DESCRIPCION: SISTEMA DE 8 BARRAS

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 10

SEP 600 – SISTEMAS ELECTRICOS DE POTENCIA

1. Para el sistema que se muestra en la figura, utilizando el método DC:

a. Determinar la matriz de suceptancias nodales.

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 11

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 12

Capacidad efectiva (Oferta)

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 13

𝑂𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 = 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 = 𝑃 [𝑀𝑊 ] = 60 + 50 + 100 = 210𝑀𝑊

𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 = 𝑃 [𝑀𝑊 ] = 40 + 25 + 20 + 80 = 165𝑀𝑊

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 14

∆𝑃 = 60𝑀𝑊 ∗ 0.01 = 0.6𝑀𝑊

𝐷 =𝐷 + ∆𝑃 = 165 + 5.6 = 170.6𝑀𝑊

𝐶 =𝐷 ∗ 𝑅 = 170.6 ∗ 1.07 = 182.4𝑀𝑊

𝑅 = 𝑂𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 − 𝐶 . = 210 − 182.4 = 27.6𝑀𝑊

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 15

𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 = 100𝑀𝑊 → 𝐻𝑜𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 (𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎)

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 16

SEP 600 – SISTEMAS ELECTRICOS DE POTENCIA

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 17

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 18

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 19

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 20

[𝑌] 9.9493∠ − 84.9996° 9.9500∠95.00°

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 21

𝑆 = −0.25 − 𝐽0.11 = 0.27313∠ − 156.2505°

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 22

|0.986386∠ − 1.3985° − 0.986387∠ − 1.398468°| ≤ 𝜀

𝑆 = 1∠0°(9.9493∠ − 84.9996° ∗ 1∠0° + 9.9500∠95.00° ∗ 0.986386∠ − 1.3985°)

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 23

𝑆 = 0.276344∠24.8829° = 0.25069 + 𝑗0.11627

0.25069 = 𝑃 − 0.10 𝑃 = 0.35069

𝑆 = 1∠0°[(1∠0° − 0.986386∠ − 1.3985°)9.95∠ − 85° + 1∠0° ∗ 7 ∗ 10 ∠90°]∗

𝑆 = 0.27314∠153.4543° = −0.244346 + 𝑗0.12207

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 24

∆𝑆 = 𝑆 +𝑆 = 0.250679 + 𝑗0.11627 − 0.244346 + 𝑗0.12207 = 0.006333 + 𝑗0.0094

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 25

(RESOLUCION DEL PROBLEMA: METODO GAUSS SEIDEL)

DESCRIPCION: SISTEMA DE 2 BARRAS (PQ- SLACK)

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 26

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 27

SEP 600 – SISTEMAS ELECTRICOS DE POTENCIA

(METODO GAUSS SEIDEL)

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 28

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 29

𝐷𝑖𝑚 = #𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑉 + 2#𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑄

Ing. Max Guizada Sainz 30