Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
1 2
Ensayo Clínico
vs
3 4
Ensayo clínico
(fase final y decisiva de numerosas 1
líneas de investigación)
5 6
¿Porqué se realizan ensayos clínicos?
Permiten a los investigadores probar hipótesis
biológicas en pacientes vivos y tienen la
Muchos nuevos tratamientos y medicamentos
posibilidad de modificar las normas asistenciales.
prueban ser seguros y eficaces en tubos de
ensayo y en animales, pero deben probar ser
seguros y efectivos en humanos antes de que se Permiten obtener información válida sobre el
puedan prescribir. efecto de intervenciones en salud que buscan
prevenir o tratar un problema.
7 8
Tratamiento Prevención
9 10
Diagnóstico
Ensayos Clínicos
Incluyen a personas que tienen (y no tienen) Investigación Clínica
signos o síntomas de la enfermedad o ECA “estándar de oro”
condición
11 12
ECA “estándar de oro”
• Grupo control
Ensayo clínico aleatorizado controlado • similares al inicio para que las diferencias al final
puedan ser atribuidas a la intervención
13 14
Aleatorización Ciego
Enmascaramiento
15 16
Desventajas
Costo
Ventaja Tiempo
Pregunta “limitada”
Diseño capaz de comprobar hipótesis Los voluntarios pueden ser diferentes a las personas que no aceptan la
aleatorización
causales
Complejidad
3
17 18
¿Porqué realizarlos? Diseños
19 20
Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery following Efficacy and safety of 10% and 16% carbamide peroxide tooth-
postoperative treatment with moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin and clavulanic whitening gels: a randomized clinical trial
acid: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study
21 22
Low intensity laser therapy in temporomandibular disorder: a Sodium fluoride and chlorhexidine effect in the inhibition of mutans
phase II double-blind study streptococci in children with dental caries: a randomized, double-
blind clinical trial
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of Low Intensity
Laser Therapy (LILT) and its influence on masticatory efficiency in patients
with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD). This study was performed using Thirty-five healthy volunteers, aged 4-8 years, with at least one
a random, placebo-controlled, and double-blind research design. Fourteen active carious lesion and no previous history of allergies were
patients were selected and divided into two groups (active and placebo).
Infrared laser (780 nm, 70 mw, 60s, 105J/cm2) was applied precisely and selected to participate in the study. A gel formulation containing
continuously into five points of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area: either 1.23% sodium fluoride or 1% chlorhexidine was topically
lateral point (LP), superior point (SP), anterior point (AP), posterior point (PP), administered to the dentition every 24 h for 6 consecutive days.
and posterior-inferior point (PIP) of the condylar position. This was performed
twice per week, for a total of eight sessions. To ensure a double-blind study, Salivary MS levels were measured at baseline (D1) and on the
two identical probes supplied by the manufacturer were used: one for the 6th (D6), 15th (D15), and 30th (D30) days. For microbiological
active laser and one for the inactive placebo laser. They were marked with analysis, Mitis Salivarius-Bacitracin agar medium was used.
different letters (A and B) by a clinician who did not perform the applications.
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a colorimetric capsule method were
employed. Data were obtained three times: before treatment (Ev1), shortly
after the eighth session (Ev2), and 30 days after the first application (Ev3).
4
23 24
Diseños Fluoride oral retention after professional topical application in
children with caries activity: effect of the immediate water
consumption
Cruzado
This blind randomized crossover in vivo study
involved children who received a professional APF
gel application followed by either drinking a glass of
water (experimental group) or without rinsing,
drinking, or eating (control group) for 2 hours. The
nonstimulated saliva was collected at 0, 5, 15, 30,
60, and 120 minutes following the professional APF
application. After a 7-day washout period, the
control and treatment groups were switched.
25 26
Diseños
Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with
ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque
with and without bristle contact
PURPOSE: To assess the in vivo plaque removal efficacy of the newly
Split mouth
marketed sonic/ultrasonic toothbrush. Plaque removal resulting from the
toothbrush being held approximately 3 mm from the tooth surface was
compared versus a no brushing control. Also, plaque removal resulting from
the brush being used according to the manufacturer's instructions was
compared versus a control of using the brush (with power turned off) like a
manual toothbrush would be used. METHODS: This was a replicate use, four-
treatment, examiner-blind, randomized, eight-period crossover design single
brushing plaque study involving 31 subjects. The four treatment regimens
consisted of (1) brushing for 2 minutes with the Ultreo powered toothbrush
according to manufacturer's instructions, (2) brushing for 2 minutes with the
Ultreo toothbrush (power turned off) using the brush like a manual
toothbrush, (3) having a trained dental hygienist hold the Ultreo toothbrush
head 3 mm from tooth surfaces for a total of 2 minutes, or (4) swishing with a
dentifrice slurry for 1 minute in the absence of toothbrushing. For each
subject, an experienced, calibrated plaque examiner performed the Turesky
¡CUIDADO!
Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index prior to brushing and following brushing.
27 28
The efficacy of a plasma arc light in orthodontic bonding: Three-year split-mouth randomized clinical comparison between
a randomized controlled clinical trial crowns fabricated in a titanium-zirconium
and a gold-palladium alloy
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance of a plasma arc light
(Ortho LITE, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) against a conventional PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical
tungsten-quartz halogen curing light (Visilux 2, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, performance of metal-ceramic crowns made with an experimental
CA, USA) for direct orthodontic bonding. DESIGN: A single centre
prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: The alloy prepared by the Nordic Institute of Dental Materials, containing
Orthodontic Department at St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, UK. SUBJECTS 15% zirconium and 85% titanium (Ti-15% Zr), and a high noble gold-
AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients requiring fixed palladium alloy (Mattikraft). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty
appliances from the orthodontic waiting list. A split mouth technique patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were selected sequentially
was adopted; with quadrants randomly assigned to either the plasma from the departmental waiting list. Each patient received 2 crowns in
arc light or the conventional halogen curing light and bonded directly the premolar or molar region. Which tooth was to receive a crown
with APC pre-adjusted edgewise brackets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: based on gold-palladium alloy or Ti-15% Zr alloy was randomly
Bracket failures. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Time taken to decided. A number of aspects indicating the clinical performance of
bond-up the appliances, patient sensitivity or discomfort during curing
and time to replace failed brackets were investigated. the crowns were recorded at baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 years.
29 30
Diseños Design of a community-based
intergenerational oral health study: "Baby
Barniz Gel
Smiles"
BACKGROUND: Rural, low-income pregnant women and their children are at high risk
Factorial for poor oral health and have low utilization rates of dental care. The Baby Smiles
study was designed to increase low-income pregnant women's utilization of dental
care, increase young children's dental care utilization, and improve home oral health
care practices.
METHODS/DESIGN: Baby Smiles was a five-year, four-site randomized intervention trial with
Cada 6 a 2 × 2 factorial design. Four hundred participants were randomly assigned to one of four
treatment arms in which they received either brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) or health
meses ?
education (HE) delivered during pregnancy and after the baby was born. In the prenatal
study phase, the interventions were designed to encourage dental utilization during
pregnancy. After childbirth, the focus was to utilize dental care for the infant by age one.
The two primary outcome measures were dental utilization during pregnancy or up to two
Cada 12 months postpartum for the mother, and preventive dental utilization by 18 months of age
for the child. Medicaid claims data will be used to assess the primary outcomes.
meses Questionnaires were administered at enrollment and 3, 9 and 18 months postpartum (study
end) to assess mediating and moderating factors.
31 32
33 34
35 36
Validez de conclusión Implementación
Planeación (logística)
Establece la relación entre la intervención y el
desenlace, si es que existe.
Adherencia de los participantes (toma de
medicamentos, asistencia, cumplir con
indicaciones)
37 38
Realización
La más demandante
La más ingrata
Sujeta a:
Descuidos
Críticas
Aburrición
39