TESIS DE GRADO

CORRELACION DE LOS ENSAYOS DE CORTE DIRECTO Y CBR PARA ARENAS MAL GRADADAS DEL RIO MAGDALENA SECTOR
PROYECTO
EL ARENAL EN EL MUNICPIO DE BARRANCABERMEJA
DESCRIPCION ARENA MAL GRADADA DEL SECTOR ARENAL

ANALISIS GRANULOMETRICO INV E - 123

WTMS: 2394.4 WLST200: 2302.8
TAMIZ W ret % RET. % PASA GRAVA (%) 8.38
3" 0.00 0.00 100.00 ARENA (%) 88.63
2 1/2" 0.00 0.00 100.00 FINOS (%) 2.99
2" 0.00 0.00 100.00 CLASIF. USC SP
1 1/2" 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 0.00 0.00 100.00
3/4" 0.00 0.00 100.00 L.LIQUIDO (%) NO LIQUIDO
1/2" 29.30 1.22 98.78 L.PLASTICO (%) NO PLASTICO
3/8" 26.20 1.09 97.68 I.PLASTICIDAD(%) NO PLASTICO
No 4 145.20 6.06 91.62 C. AASTHO
No 10 286.50 11.97 79.65
No 20 532.10 22.22 57.43 D10= 0.22
No 40 674.50 28.17 29.26 D30= 0.55
No 50 353.40 14.76 14.50 D60= 0.80

(% )
No 100 243.10 10.15 4.35

P A S A
No 200 32.50 1.36 2.99 Coeficiente de Uniformidad Cu = (D60)/(D10)= 3.64 <6
FONDO 97.20 4.06 -1.07 Coeficiente de Curvatura Cc = (D30)2/(D60∙D10)= 1.72 >1

Q U E
P O R C E N T A J E
CURVA GRANULOMETRICA
GRUESA F I NA GRUESA M EDA
I F I
N A
GR A V A A R E N A FI N OS
3" 21/ 2" 2" 1 12
/ " 1" 3/ 4" 1/ 2" 38
/ " N o4
. N o1
. 0 No. 16 No. 20 N o. 40 N o5
. 0 No. 200
No. 100

P 1 0 0. 00

9 0 .00

8 0 .00

7 0 .00

6 0 .00

5 0 .00

4 0 .00

3 0 .00

2 0 .00

1 0 .0 0

0 .0 0
1 0 0 1 0 AB E RT URA D E L 1TAM IZ (mm ) 0 .1 0 .0 1
 TESIS DE GRADO

CORRELACION DE LOS ENSAYOS DE CORTE DIRECTO Y CBR PARA ARENAS MAL

GRADADAS DEL RIO MAGDALENA SECTOR EL ARENAL EN EL MUNICPIO DE
PROYECTO BARRANCABERMEJA
DESCRIPCION ARENA CON GRAVA MAL GRADADA

ANALISIS GRANULOMETRICO INV E - 123

WTMS: 2268.4 WLST200: 2071.1
TAMIZ W ret % RET. % PASA GRAVA (%) 9.20
3" 0.00 0.00 100.00 ARENA (%) 87.46
2 1/2" 0.00 0.00 100.00 FINOS (%) 3.34
2" 0.00 0.00 100.00 CLASIF. USC SP
1 1/2" 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 0.00 0.00 100.00
3/4" 0.00 0.00 100.00 L.LIQUIDO (%) NO LIQUIDO
1/2" 24.31 1.07 98.93 L.PLASTICO (%) NO PLASTICO
3/8" 34.92 1.54 97.39 I.PLASTICIDAD(%) NO PLASTICO
No 4 149.54 6.59 90.80 C. AASTHO
No 10 314.33 13.86 76.94
No 20 535.24 23.60 53.34 D10= 0.22
No 40 654.96 28.87 24.47 D30= 0.47
No 50 263.94 11.64 12.84 D60= 1.10

(% )
No 100 140.81 6.21 6.63

P A S A
No 200 74.55 3.29 3.34 Coeficiente de Uniformidad Cu = (D60)/(D10)= 5.00 <6
FONDO 75.80 3.34 0.00 Coeficiente de Curvatura Cc = (D30)2/(D60∙D10)= 0.91 <1

Q U E
P O R C E N T A J E
CURVA GRANULOMETRICA
GRUESA FI NA GRUESA MEDI A F I
N A
GR A V A A R E N A FIN OS
3" 21/ 2" 2" 1 12
/ " 1" 3/ 4" 1/ 2" 3/ 8" No. 4 N o1
. 0 N o. 16 No. 20 No. 40 No. 50 N o2
. 00
No. 100
1 0 0 .0 0
P

9 0 .0 0

8 0 .0 0

7 0 .0 0

6 0 .0 0

5 0 .0 0

4 0 .0 0

3 0 .0 0

2 0 .0 0

1 0 .0 0

0 .0 0
1 0 0 1 0 ABE R TUR A DE L 1
T AMIZ (mm) 0 .1 0 .0 1
 TESIS DE GRADO

CORRELACION DE LOS ENSAYOS DE CORTE DIRECTO Y CBR PARA ARENAS MAL GRADADAS DEL RIO
PROYECTO MAGDALENA SECTOR EL ARENAL EN EL MUNICPIO DE BARRANCABERMEJA
DESCRIPCION ARENA CON GRAVA MAL GRADADA

ANALISIS GRANULOMETRICO INV E - 123

WTMS: 2268.4 WLST200: 2302.0
TAMIZ W ret % RET. % PASA GRAVA (%) 9.68
3" 0.00 0.00 100.00 ARENA (%) 87.02
2 1/2" 0.00 0.00 100.00 FINOS (%) 3.30
2" 0.00 0.00 100.00 CLASIF. USC SP
1 1/2" 0.00 0.00 100.00
1" 0.00 0.00 100.00
3/4" 0.00 0.00 100.00 L.LIQUIDO (%) NO LIQUIDO
1/2" 23.86 1.05 98.95 L.PLASTICO (%) NO PLASTICO
3/8" 17.51 0.77 98.18 I.PLASTICIDAD(%) NO PLASTICO
No 4 178.20 7.86 90.32 C. AASTHO
No 10 365.52 16.11 74.21
No 20 527.70 23.26 50.94 D10= 0.20
No 40 548.24 24.17 26.78 D30= 0.48
No 50 245.65 10.83 15.95 D60= 1.24

(% )
No 100 228.21 10.06 5.89

P A S A
No 200 58.68 2.59 3.30 Coeficiente de Uniformidad Cu = (D60)/(D10)= 6.20 >6
FONDO 53.22 2.35 0.95 Coeficiente de Curvatura Cc = (D30)2/(D60∙D10)= 0.93 <1

Q U E
P O R C E N T A J E
CURVA GRANULOMETRICA
GRUESA FI NA GRUESA MEDI A F I
N A
GR A V A A R E N A FIN OS
3" 21/ 2" 2" 1 12
/ " 1" 3/ 4" 1/ 2" 3/ 8" No. 4 N o1
. 0 N o. 16 No. 20 No. 40 No. 50 No. 100 N o2
. 00

P 1 0 0 .0 0

9 0 .0 0

8 0 .0 0

7 0 .0 0

6 0 .0 0

5 0 .0 0

4 0 .0 0

3 0 .0 0

2 0 .0 0

1 0 .0 0

0 .0 0
1 0 0 1 0 ABE R TUR A DE L 1
T AMIZ (mm) 0 .1 0 .0 1