Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
El presente trabajo tiene como principal objetivo analizar las variables de la calidad de
Lima Norte. Para tal efecto, se hizo recolección de data en las cuatro principales
ítems del Modelo base. Se encuestó a 100 clientes, de los cuales, 25 fueron
de significancia para cada parámetro, menor al 5%, por lo cual se rechazó la hipótesis
nula que el valor del parámetro es cero. Finalmente se obtuvieron valores parecidos
entre las medias de satisfacción de los clientes de Tiendas Mass (4.20), Maxiahorro
(4.48), Hiperbodega (4.56) y Tiendas Vega (4.56), todas con una significancia del
estadístico de Levene mayor a 0.05 por lo cual, se aceptó la hipótesis nula de que las
varianzas son iguales, y posteriormente una Tabla Anova con una significancia mayor
a 0.05 por lo cual se aceptó la hipótesis nula que la Satisfacción promedio no difiere
The main objective of the present work is to analyze the quality service variables and
its relationship with the satisfaction of the discount store customers in North Lima. For
this purpose, data was collected in the four main discount stores in North Lima:
based on the Servperf Model, which was adapted to the research context. Expert
validation of the 22 items of the Base Model was carried out. 100 customers were
surveyed, 25 of them were buyers from Tiendas Mass, 25 from Maxiahorro, 25 from
Hiperbodega and 25 buyers from Tiendas Vega. Subsequently, the statistical analysis
was carried out in the SPSS program, where the factor analysis was carried out for the
reduction of the dimensions and validation of the reliability analysis, then descriptive
statistics and inferential statistics were performed. It was possible to verify that only 2
significance value for each parameter, less than 5%, for which the null hypothesis that
the value of the parameter is zero was rejected. Finally, similar values were obtained
between the customer satisfaction means of Tiendas Mass (4.20), Maxiahorro (4.48),
Hiperbodega (4.56) and Tiendas Vega (4.56), all with a significance of the Levene
statistic greater than 0.05, therefore , the null hypothesis that the variances are equal
was accepted, and subsequently an Anova Table with a significance greater than 0.05,
for which the null hypothesis that the average satisfaction did not differ between the