Type II fuzzy logic

controller for a liquid level

system
Autor: M.Sc. Oscar Manuel Duque Suarez
M.Sc. Oscar Manuel Duque Suarez
Formación Académica

Doctorado UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL IBEROAMERICANA DE MEXICO

DOCTORADO EN PROYECTOS LÍNEA INGENIERÍA
Diciembrede2017 - de

Maestría/Magister UNIVERSIDAD DE PAMPLONA

maestria en controles industriales
Septiembrede2011 - Noviembrede 2013
DISEÑO DE UN SISTEMA DE RECONOCIMIENTO DE ROSTROS APLICANDO IA Y VISIÓN ARTIFICIAL.

Especialización UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL

ESPECIALIZACIÓN EN MECATRONICA INDUSTRIAL
Juliode2016 - Febrerode 2018

Pregrado/Universitario UNIVERSIDAD DE PAMPLONA

Ingenieria Mecatrónica
Enerode2002 - Marzode 2007
DISEÑO, IMPLEMENTACIÓN E INTEGRACIÓN DE LOS SISTEMAS ELECTROMECÁNICOS Y SCADA, PARA EL CONTROL,
POSICIONAMIENTO DE UNA ANTENA SATELITAL Y RECEPCIÓN DE SEÑALES SATELITALES
Fuzzy Logic
Applied to a wide range of problems

Modeling and approximation of systems

Model human knowledge or nonlinear approaches

Prototype to show results

Type II fuzzy logic controller.

Validate.

Prototype
Plant.

Alternative AI
Technique.
Fuzzy logic controller (FLC) design
Fuzzy
type I

Error
Fuzzy D.Error
type II

Control
Variable
Inputs variables

NG
PG NP a) Universe of the Error variable for the type I fuzzy

Error
PP ZE
b) Universe of the Error variable for the type II fuzzy
Error Fuzzy Type I

a) Universe of the Error variable for the type I fuzzy

Error Fuzzy Type II

b) Universe of the Error variable for the type II fuzzy

Inputs variables

NG
a) Universe of the D.ERROR of the type I fuzzy

D.Error
PG ZE
b) Universe of the D.ERROR of the type II fuzzy
D. Error Fuzzy Type I

a) Universe of the Error variable for the type I fuzzy

D. Error Fuzzy Tpye II

b) Universe of the D.ERROR of the type II fuzzy

Output Variable
NG

PG Control NP
Variable

PP ZE
Output Fuzzy Type I

Table 1. Parameters of type I fuzzy output functions

Output Fuzzy Type II

Table 2. Parameters of type II fuzzy output functions

Rules

Table 3. Rules for type I and type II fuzzy control systems

Results

Fig. 4. Fuzzy controller diagram of the type I fuzzy

Fig. 5. Fuzzy controller diagram of the type II fuzzy

Change in reference level value

Fig. 6. Response of fuzzy logic controllers for reference levels

Validation of the fuzzy control systems
Response with noise
signal
Response with delay

Response parameters
Validation of the fuzzy control systems

Fig. 7.b. Response with delay

Fig. 7.a. Response with noise signal
Validation of the fuzzy control systems

Table 4 Comparisons to of the responses

Conclusions
• The implementation of the fuzzy logic controllers of the level control prototype, it is the
type II fuzzy controller presents the best response. Likewise, thanks to its second
membership function type II fuzzy systems present a great advantage because they can
consider the design ranges for uncertainties or events that could occur.
• In the methodology for the development of type II fuzzy controllers, the type to be
implemented is prioritized. Facilitating the calculation of the response result for the
control system since the computational cost will be much lower through the selection of
Sugeno. Because this will not be done by reducing the type of fuzzy sets of type II to type
I, this being the main difference with it. And, the improvement in the response of the
control system to uncertainties.
• The fuzzy type II controller obtained better performance conditions against all possible
scenarios, showing as results a great robustness by this control strategy to noise signals,
level reference changes, delays in the response of the sensed signal in front of to the fuzzy
type I controller.
References
• Dongrui, W. and Tan, W.W. (2006). “A simplified type-2 fuzzy logic controller for real-time control”, ISA Transactions. Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 503-516.
• Castillo, O. (2012). “Type-2 Fuzzy Logic in Intelligent Control Applications”, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 3-56.
• Castillo, O. and Melin P. (2008). “Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Theory and Applications”, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 5-42.
• Chun, M. and Cheng, S. (2003). Dynamical near optimal training for interval type-2 fuzzy neural network (T2FNN) with genetic algorithm”,
Brisbane, Australia, pp. 4-30.
• Chaoui, H., Gueaieb, W., Biglarbegian, M and Yagoub, Mustapha. (2013). “Computationally Efficient Adaptive Type-2 Fuzzy Control of Flexible-
Joint Manipulators”, Robotics, Vol. 2, pp 66-91.
• Mendel, J. M. and Bob J., R. I. (2002). “Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Made Simple”, IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 117-127.
• Mendel, J. M.; John, R. I. and Liu, F. (2006). “Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple”, IEEE Transactions on fuzzy systems, Vol. 14, No.
6, pp. 808-821.
• Rodríguez, M and Huertas, Y. (2016). “Metodología para el Diseño de Conjuntos Difusos Tipo-2 a partir de Opiniones de Expertos”, Revista
Ingeniería. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 121-137.
• Liang, Q., Karnik, N. N. and Mendel, J. M. (2000). “Connection Admission Control in ATM Networks Using Survey-Based Type-2 Fuzzy Logic
Systems”, IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 329-337.
• Liang, Q. and Mendel, J. M. (2000a). “Overcoming Time-Varying Co-Channel Interference Using Type-2 Fuzzy Adaptive Filters”, IEEE
Transactions on circuits and systems, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1419-1428.
• Liang, Q. and Mendel, J. M. (2000b). “Equalization of Nonlinear Time-Varying Channels Using Type-2 Fuzzy Adaptive Filters”, IEEE Transactions
on fuzzy systems. Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 551-563.
• Almaraashi, M. (2012). “Learning of Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems using Simulated Annealing”, Leicester, UK, pp. 11-35.
Questions
 GRACIAS
Ciencia sin conciencia no es más que ruina
del alma.

- Francois Rabelais