Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Pagina 6 Metodos
Pagina 6 Metodos
y** 1.0698; P** 3.6502; T** 2.3536; A** 1.6785; y V** 0.5859 ; por lo tanto
F = 0.8489 (4.108) 0.5 = 1.72 m. Por lo tanto, z1 = 0.457; T1* =10.647 m; y en A*t =
41,392 m 2 .
CONCLUSIONES
Usando el método de multiplicador indeterminado de Lagrange método, diseño
óptimo de la sección del canal parabólico teniendo en cuenta que se puede hacer
freeboard. Las ecuaciones presentadas son simples y en forma algebraica explícita, que
son convenientes para usar en el diseño óptimo de un canal parabólico teniendo en
cuenta francobordo ya sea descarga dependiente o profundidad dependiente. El
método da como resultado las dimensiones del canal en cálculos de un solo paso.
Alternativamente, los gráficos presentados pueden ser utilizados como un contador de
cuentas listo. La sección óptima con el francobordo es más estrecho y profundo que el
mejor hidráulico sección sin francobordo.
REFERENCIAS
Atmapoojya, S.L. and R.N. Ingle, Optimal design for a canal section, J. Indian
Water Works Association, 51 – 54, 2001.
Atmapoojya, S.L. and R.N. Ingle, The optimal canal section with consideration of
freeboard, J. Institution of Engineers (India), 83 (CV4), 268 – 272, 2003.
Babaeyan-Koopaei, K. Dimensionless curves for normal depth calculations in
canal sections, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 127(6), 386-389, 2001.
Babaeyan-Koopaei, K., E.M. Valentine and D.C. Swailes, Optimal design of
parabolic bottomed triangle canals, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 126(6),
408-411, 2000.
Bureau of Indian Standards, Criteria for design of lined canals and guidelines for
selection of type of lining, IS:10430, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi,
1982.
Chahar, B.R., Optimal Design of Parabolic Canals, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg.,
ASCE, 131(6), 546 – 554, 2005.
Chahar, B.R., Optimal Design of a special class of curvilinear bottomed channel
section, J. Hyd. Engrg., ASCE, 133(4), In Press, 2007.
Chow, V.T, Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973.
Froehlich, D.C., Width and depth constrained best trapezoidal section, J. Irrig.
and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 120(4), 828-835, 1994.
Godara, R., Optimal Design of Parabolic channel section, M.E. Thesis, Dept. of
Civil Engg., JNV University, Jodhpur, 2003.
Kreyszig, E., Advanced engineering mathematics, John Wiley & sons (ASIA) pvt.
Ltd. Singapore, 2001.
Loganathan, G.V., Optimal design of parabolic canals, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg.,
ASCE, 117(5), 716-735, 1991.
Mironenko, A.P., L.S. Willardson and S.A. Jenab, Parabolic canal design and
analysis, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 241-246, 1984.
Monadjemi, P., General formulation of best hydraulic channel section, J. Irrig.
and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 120(1), 27-35, 1994.
Novman, A., Optimal Parabolic channel section with freeboard, M.E. Thesis,
Dept. of Civil Engg., JNV University, Jodhpur, 2003.
Streeter, V. L., Economical canal cross sections, Trans. ASCE, 110, 421-
430, 1945.
Swamee, P.K., Discussion on ‘General formulation of best hydraulic channel
section’ by P. Monadjemi, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE,
121(2), 222, 1995.
Swamee, P.K., G.C. Mishra and B.R. Chahar, Minimum cost design of lined canal
sections, J. Water Resour. Mangmnt., 14(1), 1-12, 2000a.
Swamee, P.K., G.C. Mishra and B.R. Chahar, Comprehensive design of minimum
cost irrigation canal sections, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE,
126(5), 322-327, 2000b.
Swamee, P.K., G.C. Mishra and B.R. Chahar, Design of mínimum earthwork cost
sections, J. Water Resour. Mangmnt., 15(1), 17-30, 2001.
Swamee, P.K., G.C. Mishra and B.R. Chahar, Optimal design of transmission
canal, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 128(4), 234-243,
2002.