Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Precauciones y Limpieza
Precaucin: Las tapas de la bancada principal de un motor no deben ser
usadas en otro bloque, debido a que son mecanizadas conjuntamente.
Lavado solo con agua y jabn despus de un rectificado y no con
derivados del petrleo.
EQUIPOS Y MATERIALES
Material Directo
Aluminio (al): es un metal ligero
- Densidad: 2700 kg/m3, un tercio de la del acero.
- Punto de fusin bajo: 660 C (933 K).
Materiales Indirectos
Arena de Zircon: Es un polvo amorfo, negro-azulado, o un metal brillante blancogrisceo. El zirconio se encuentran en la India, Ucrania, Malasia, Australia, EUA, etc.
La arena de Zirconio presenta excelentes propiedades refractarias,
abrasivas, baja dilatacin trmica y elevada conductividad trmica.
Su composicin es Silicato de circonio (ZrSiO4) y tiene una densidad
aparente aproximada de 2,7 gr/c.c. Su temperatura de fusin es 2420C.
Cola: La cola es el primer elemento que se combina con la arena de zircon para que esta
adquiera forma del molde maestro, dicho pegamento esta diseado para unir los corazones
de arena y afianzarlos dentro del molde.
Endurecedor: El endurecedor se emplea para solidificar la mezcla, para ello se emplea
un gas que lo va a activar para que pueda endurecer el molde.
Polvo de Talco: El polvo de talco es empleado para evitar que las partculas de arena
se peguen al aluminio o al molde final.
PROCESO DE PRODUCCION
Tipo de Fundicin
Fundicin a presin: En el proceso por fundicin a presin, el metal
fundido es obligado a fluir hacia arriba por presin de gas en un molde
de grafito o de metal y es mantenida hasta que el metal se haya
solidificado totalmente dentro del molde.
Este procedimiento es utilizado para fundiciones de alta calidad
Diagrama de flujo
Planos
PROYECTO
N
o
DESCRIPCION
ACTIVIDAD
FALLA
POTENCIAL
EFECTOS
POTENCIALES
DE LA FALLA
SEVERID
AD
CAUSA
POTENCIAL
DE LA
FALLA
OCURREN
CIA
DET
MONOBLO
CK
FISURAS,
PUEDE
ROMPERSEY
TERMINA SU
VIDA UTIL
PRESION,
TEPERATUR
A
NIVEL
DE
PRIORID
AD DE
RIESGO
21
DEFORMACION
ES
PROBLEMAAS
AL MOMENTO
DE
ENSAMBLAR
CON OTRAS
48
ERROR EN
LAS
ALEACIONE
S
CLASIFICACI
ON
PIEZAS
35
196
7
NO CUMPLIR
CON LAS
ESPECIFICACIO
NES
FALLA EN LA
CALIDAD DEL
RODUCTO
TERMINADO
4
POCA RIGIDEZ
EN EL BLOQUE
SUPERFICIES
LIBRES DE
RAYADURAS Y
COMPLETAMEN
YTE PLANAS
ERROR EN
LA
RECOLECCI
ON DE
DATOS
QUEBRADURA
S
24
4
LAS CAMISAS
NO
ENSAMBLARIA
N
CORRECTAME
NTE
3
ERROR EN
LA
TEMPERATU
RA
ERROR EN
MEDIDAS Y
ALEACIONE
S
Yes
Was the SFMEA and/or DFMEA prepared using the Chrysler, Ford and General Motors
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) reference manual?
3
4
Have design characteristics that affect high risk priority failure modes been identified?
Have appropriate corrective actions been assigned to high risk priority numbers?
Have risk priorities been revised when corrective actions have been completed and verified?
A. GENERAL
Does the
design require:
1
2
3
New Materials?
Special Tooling?
Has assembly build variation analysis been considered?
4
5
6
7
Yes
9
10
11
12
A. GENERAL
CONTINUED
13
14
B. Engineering
Drawings
15
Have dimensions that affect fit, function and durability been identified?
16
17
Are sufficient control points and datum surfaces identified to design functional gages?
18
19
Are there any requirements specified that cannot be evaluated using known inspection
techniques?
22
Yes
23
Can additional samples be tested when a reaction plan requires it, and still conduct regularly
scheduled in-process tests?
24
25
C. Engineering
Performance
Specifications continued
26 Is the specified test sampling size and/or frequency feasible?
D. Material Specification
28
Yes
29
Are specified materials, heat treat and surface treatments compatible with the durability
requirements in the identified environment?
30
31
32
33
34
35
If so,
* Will characteristics be checked in-house?
* Is test equipment available?
* Will training be required to assure accurate
results?
36
37
Yes
D. Material
Specification continued
Have the following material requirements been considered:
38
* Handling?
39
* Storage?
40
* Environment?
Question
Yes
* New equipment?
* New tooling?
* New test equipment?
Will a preliminary capability study be conducted at the tooling and/or equipment
manufacturer?
Has test equipment feasibility and accuracy been established?
13
14
Are setup instructions for new equipment and tooling complete and understandable?
15
Will capable gages be available to run preliminary process capability studies at the equipment
suppliers facility?
16
17
Have process characteristics that affect special product characteristics been identified?
18
Yes
19
Does the manufacturing equipment have sufficient capacity to handle forecasted production
and service volumes?
20
Yes
Is the assistance of the customer's quality assurance or product engineering activity needed to
develop or concur to the control plan?
Has the supplier identified who will be the quality liason with the customer?
Has the supplier identified who will be the quality liason with the suppliers?
Has the quality system been reviewed using the Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors Quality
System Assessment?
Question
Yes
* Capability studies?
* Problem solving?
* Mistake proofing?
* Other topics as identified?
Is each operation provided with process instructions that are keyed to the control plan?
18
19
21
22
23
24
Are visual aids:
25
26
*
*
*
*
Test frequencies?
Sample sizes?
Reaction plans?
Documentation?
*
*
Easily understood?
Available?
* Accessible?
* Approved?
* Dated and current?
Is there a procedure to implement, maintain, and establish reaction plans for statistical control
charts?
31
Yes
32
Have provisions been made to place the latest drawings and specifications at the point of
inspection?
33
Have provisions been made to place the following at the monitored operation:
34
35
36
37
38
*
*
*
*
*
Inspection gages?
Gage instructions?
Reference Samples?
Inspection logs?
Have provisions been made to certify and
routinely calibrate gages and test equipment?
Have required measurement system capability studies been:
39
Completed?
* Acceptable?
Are layout inspection equipment and facilities adequate to provide initial and ongoing layout of
all details and components?
50
51
Yes
52
53
Yes
Does the floor plan identify all required process and inspection points?
Have clearly marked areas for all material, tools, and equipment?
3
Has sufficient space been allocated?
Are process and inspection areas:
4
* Of adequate size?
5
* Properly lighted?
6
Do inspection areas contain necessary equipment and files?
Are there adequate:
7
8
9
* Staging areas?
* Impound areas?
Are inspection points logically located to prevent shipment of nonconforming products?
10
Have controls been established to eliminate the potential for an operation, including outside
processing, to contaminate or mix similar products?
11
Yes
12
13
Yes
Does the floor chart illustrate the sequence of production and inspection stations?
Were all the appropriate FMEAs (SFMEA, DFMEA) available and as aids to develop the
process flow chart?
Is the flow chart keyed to product and process checks in the control plan?
4
5
Does the flow chart describe how the product will move, i.e., roller conveyor, slide containers,
etc.?
Has the pull system/optimization been considered for this process?
Have provisions been made to identify and inspect reworked products before being used?
Have potential quality problems due to handling and outside processing been identified and
corrected?
Was the Process FMEA prepared using the Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors guidelines?
Yes
Have all operations affecting fit, function, durability, governmental regulations and safety been
identified and listed sequentially?
3
4
Have appropriate corrective actions been planned or taken for high risk priority numbers?
Have appropriate corrective actions been planned or taken for high severity numbers?
Were risk priority numbers revised when corrective action was completed?
Were high severity numbers revised when a design change was completed?
9
10
11
Were customer plant problems used as an aid in developing the process FMEA?
12
Have the causes been described in terms of something that can be fixed or controlled?
13
Where detection is the major factor, have provisions been made to control the cause prior to the
next operation?
Was the control plan methodology referenced in section 6 used in preparing the control plan?
Have all known customers concerns been identified to facilitate the selection of special
product/process characteristics?
Were SFMEA, DFMEA, and PFMEA used to prepare the control plan?
Yes
Are gages and test equipment available as required by the control plan?
10
Ffdgfdg