La historia de la peinadora Rieter

. . . . in.Combing
Leader . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comber E 7/5-A – 1984

Golpes por min: 300

Peso máxima de la napa: 70g/m
Producción máxima: 39.5 kg/h
Eficiencia: 90%
Tren de estiraje: 3 sobre 5 con
caja de engranes
Peine fijo: forma de aguja

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 2

Comber E 7/6 – 1988

Golpes por min: 335

Peso máxima de la napa: 80g/m
Producción máxima: 45.0 kg/h
Eficiencia: 92%
Tren de estiraje: 3 sobre 5 con
caja de engranes
Peine fijo: forma de aguja

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 3

Comber E 60H – 1995

Golpes por min: 350

Peso máxima de la napa: 80g/m
Producción máxima: 48.0 kg/h
Eficiencia: 92 - 94%
Tren de estiraje: 3 sobre 5 con
accionamiento de tren de
estiraje con coreas
Peine fijo: forma de aguja

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 4

Comber E 62 – 1999

Golpes por min: 400

Peso máxima de la napa: 80g/m
Producción máxima: 58.0 kg/h
Eficiencia: 94%
Tren de estiraje: 3 sobre 5 con
accionamiento de tren de
estiraje con coreas
Peine fijo: forma de aguja
A partir de E62:
Aumento de producción con
ayuda de Computer Aided
Process Development C•A•P•D

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 5

Comber E 65 – 2004
Golpes por min: 450
Peso máxima de la napa: 80g/m
Producción máxima: 66.0 kg/h
Eficiencia: 94%
Tren de estiraje: 3 sobre 3 con
accionamiento de tren de
estiraje con coreas
Peine fijo: forma de diente
Peines circulares: tipo Ri-Q-Top

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 6

Comber E 66 – 2007

Golpes por min: 500

Peso máxima de la napa: 80g/m
Producción máxima: 72.0 kg/h
Eficiencia: 94%
Tren de estiraje: 3 sobre 3 con
accionamiento de tren de
estiraje con coreas
Peine fijo: forma de diente
Peines circulares: tipo Ri-Q-Top
Nueva plancha del vellón

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 7

Comber E 66 – Leader in Combing
Comber E 66 – News

500 nips/min Circular comb

9015

72 kg/h Best fleece quality

effective production

Reduced Gentle sliver transport

power consumption

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 8

Comber E 66 – Leader in Combing
72kg/h 2% Raw Material 12% Power Saving
kg/h 80
Savings
70
+39%
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Others E 65 E 66
Others E450
65nips/min
/ E 75 E 66 / E500
76
385 nips/min C•A•P•D
500 nips/min

C•A•P•D500 Effective Top Yarn Quality

Combing Elements

Special Applications Semi-Automatic Fully Automatic

Lap Transport Lap Transport

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 9

Comber E 66 – Drafting Unit
Gentle Fiber Treatment and High Sliver Quality
• 3 over 3 cylinders with variable
pre- and main draft distances
• Gentle fiber treatment with variable
draft settings
• Best spectrograms and sliver
uniformity
• Close distances setable to process
1" cotton

variable • Fleece trumpet for ideal sliver

formation
variable
• Improved suction/cleaning concept

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 10

Comber E 66 – Fleece
Best Fleece Quality
• Optimally coordinated technology
elements and movements provide
best fleece quality
• Fleece edges are improved
considerably

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 11

Comber E 66 – Sliver
Gentle Sliver Transport for Improved Quality
• Sliver deflection elements rotating
• Gentle transport of combed sliver
to coiler unit
• Best sliver guiding
• Improved sliver uniformity
e.g. sliver evenness of CO 1 1/8”:
500 nips/min  CV% 2.8 - 3.0

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 12

Comber – Drafting Unit
Drafting Technology
E 7/6 – E 62 E 65, E 66

variable variable

variable
fix

Drafting system: 3 over 5 Drafting system: 3 over 3

Pre-draft distance: fix Pre-draft distance: variable
Main draft distance: variable Main draft distance: variable

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 13

Comber E 66 – C•A•P•D500
Production Increase with Computer Aided Process Development C•A•P•D500

Nipper control

Top combing

Nipper

Feeding

Circular combing

Nipper motion

Detaching motion

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 14

Comber E 66 – Best Fiber Selection
Raw Material Savings

Considerable
noil savings
Noil

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 15

Comber E 66 – Circular Comb
PRIMACOMB® for Best Quality at Highest Production
• High precision production in
Switzerland
• Specially designed for Rieter
combing process
• Optimised for highest batt weight
and best quality, productivity,
economy

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 16

Comber E 66 – Top Comb
Ri-Q-Top – Best Combing Effectiveness
• Developed with C•A•P•D+
• Teeth geometry for high top comb
efficiency
• High quality constancy
• Best extraction of short fibers, dust,
trash, neps an seat coats
• Up to 4 times less cleaning
due to optimized self cleaning effect
• Patented by Rieter

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 17

Comber E 66 – Nipper
The Nipper for Best Quality and Highest Production
• High precision production in
Switzerland
• Processing of batt weight
up to 80 g/m
• Every single nipper tested
concerning clamping and distance
circular comb to nipper
• Mill experience with more than
75’000 nippers
• Noise certification acc. to ISO
 86 dBA

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 18

Comber E 62 / E 65 – Drafting Unit
Oil Exchange Interval
E 61, E 62, E 72 E 65, E 66

every 3’000 hours every 4’000 hours

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 19

Comber E 66 – Yarn Quality
Imperfections – Medium Staple
Values [1/1000m]
140

120

100
E 65 / E 75 – 450 nips/min, comb 8015
80
E 66 / E 76 – 500 nips/min, comb 9015
60

40

20

0
thin places thick places neps total IPI CVm
[-50%] [+50%] [+200%] [%]
Ne 36; αe 3.6; 1 3/32“; 16% noil
tests run on E 65, E 66

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 20

Comber – SPEED
Comber Speed

[nips/min]
550

500

450

400

350

300

250
E 7/5-A E 60 H E 62 E 65 E 66
Comber modell

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 21

Comber – Production
Comber Production

[kg/h]
80

70

60

50

40

30

20
E 7/5-A E 60 H E 62 E 65 E 66
Comber modell

Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 22

Comber – Evolution – Innovation
Reduction of Power Consumption (kWh/kg combed sliver)
Percentage [%]
110

100
-15%
90
-5.5%
80 Main drive,
-5%
Belt driven C•A•P•D
drafting unit -12.5%
70 C•A•P•D+

60 reduced inertia forces
improved motor efficiency
50
1988 1995 1999 2004 2007
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006
E 7/6 E 60 E 62 E 65 E 66
500 nips/min, 72 kg/h:
3.5 kWh = 48.6 kW/ton combed sliver
Combing Comparison Dec. 2009 ka/ EM 23