Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Key Features
• Classic papers by leading clinicians and researchers in the field
• Includes updates by the original authors •
• Brings together material otherwise only available in 15 individual copies of the journal
Manual Therapy
• Bound in a sturdy cover allowing frequent use and clinical reference.
••. .,
• manual therapy
• back pain
• orthopedics
ISBN 0-443-07403-8
II III
Visit our website for
additional outstanding
products
ELSEY] ER www.elsevierhealth.com
SCIENCE
Manual Therapy Masterclasses
Edited by
Karen S. Beeton
Principal Lecturer, Department of Allied Health Professions - Physiotherapy
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
Foreword by
Af'�����6�E
-
EDINBURGH LONDON NEW YORK OXFORD PHILADELPHIA ST LOUIS SYDNEY TORONTO 2003
Churchill Livingstone
An imprint of Elsevier Limited.
Note
Medical knowledge is constantly changing. As Ilew
information becomes available, changes in treatment,
procedures, equipment and the usc of drugs bt."'Come
necessary. n'e author /contributors and the publishe-fs have
taken great care to ensure that the information given in this
text is accurate and up to date. However, readers arc strongly
advised to confirm that the information, especially with
regard to drug us.:1ge, complies with the latest legislation and
standards of practice.
The
your source for books.
Publisher's
journals and multimedia
policy IS to use
in the health sciences paper manufactured
www.elsevierhealth.com 'rom sustaInable lorests
4 Muscle control-pain control. W hat exercises 10 Use of real-time ultrasound imaging for
Section 4 Sacroiliac Joint 139 14 The role of physiotherapy in the prevention and
treatment of osteoporosis 187
11 Sacroiliac dysfunction in dancers with low
Postscript 209
back pain 141
Kim Bennell, Karim Khan,
Lawrence DeMann Jr
Heather A. McKay
Index 227
13 The Mulligan Concept: Its application in the
management of spinal conditions 177
Linda Exelby
Contributors
Professor, Department of Experimental Clinical and Clinical Supervisor, The University of Queensland,
Health Psychology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Mater Hospital Back Stability Clinic, Mater
Mark J Comerford
and Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Senior Lecturer, The British School of Osteopathy,
Vancouver, BC, Canada Founder and Director of The Expectant Mothers
Clinic, London, United Kingdom
Sarah Mottram
In developing the objectives for the Manllal Therapy the opportunity to add a postscript to their original
journal, it was considered important to produce a work. Manual therapy is no longer focused almost
journal for the publication of scientific works in the field exclusively on manipulative therapy. Presentations deal
and, at the same time, have a special feature which with examination and management of all systems,
focused on the clinical management of patients. Hence including the articular, muscle and neural systems and,
a Masterclass section was instituted where leading accordingly, the management approaches are inclusive
clinicians and researchers are invited to contribute work of manipulative therapy and other pain relieving
on aspects of contemporary clinical practice. techniques, therapeutic exercise and education in a
Spinal pain is the most common musculoskeletal multi-modal management regime. This is in accord with
disorder of modern day society and accordingly, is the conclusions of the latest systematic reviews for evidence
most common disorder managed by practitioners of based clinical practices. Notably, this Masterclass
manual therapy. Not surprisingly, several of the collection includes the key changes that have occurred
Masterclass features published in Manual Therapy have in therapeutic exercise in recent times with the increasing
focused on aspects of disorders of the vertebral understanding of the nature of motor control problems
column. The series of Masterclasses brought together associated with spinal pain syndromes. Of importance,
in this v o l u m e present some of the many the manual therapist's concerns with preventative health
circumstances that confront the practitioner in their and healthy lifestyle are beginning to emerge and are an
daily clinical practice. Collectively, they reflect the important area for future manual therapy practice.
biopsychosocial model of spinal pain, which is the This collection of Masterclasses also reflects the
basis of current treatment approaches. Chapters deal multi-disciplinary nature of modern manual therapy.
with the entire spectrum of issues, ranging from the Manual therapy is not discipline specific; rather, all
physical or 'mechanism-based' clinical reasoning and diSCiplines have taken up the challenge of evidence
diagnostic process used by manual therapy clinicians based practice and this is reflected in this series of
to understand patients' presenting pain and functional papers. We have not solved the problem of spinal pain,
problems, to psychosocial issues which need to be and clinicians can push the boundaries with their
considered in the holistic management of the spinal experiences and ideas. The international exchange of
pain patient. knowledge and practice between disciplines can only
This collection of papers also reflects contemporary further the research in the field and the practice of the
manual therapy practice, and contributors have taken clinician to the ultimate benefit of the patient.
x
As co-editors of Manual Therapy, we trust that forward to her continuing work with Manual Therapy in
clinicians will enjoy this series o f papers o n the production of the Masterclass section.
contemporary manual therapy practice for the vertebral
column. We extend our congratulations to Karen Beeton, Gwendolen A. Jull
the Editorial Committee member responsible for this Ann P. Moore
section of the journal, for compiling this series. We look Manual Therapy Editors
Preface
Manual Therapy is an international peer-reviewed articles for the readers. The Masterclass authors were
journal that presents current research on all aspects of invited to write a short postscript if they wished,
manual and manipulative therapy of relevance to reflecting on any developments in the evidence base
clinicians, educators, researchers and students with an and/ or new developments in clinical practice since the
interest in this field. The journal, which is now in its 8th original publication of their paper.
year of publication, includes review articles, original Manual Therapy Masterclasses - The Vertebral Column
research papers, case reports, abstracts, book reviews consists of 15 Masterclasses on all aspects of assessment
and a bibliography. Such is the quality of the papers and management of the spine. The Masterclasses have
published, it is one of the few allied health journals to been classified according to the regional areas of the
be indexed in Index Medicus and Medline. spine and cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacroiliac joints
One of the core components of the Manual Therapy depending on the main focus of the article. There is also
jour nal is the M asterclass. The purpose of the a section on general spinal issues and an index is
Masterclass section is to describe in detail clinical included.
aspects of patient management within a theoretical, The postscripts which accompany the articles raise
evidence-based framework. This may relate to specific three issues. First, they demonstrate the breadth of
treatment techniques, a particular management strategy research currently being carried out in the various fields
or the management of a specific clinical enti ty. and secondly, they draw on new evidence to support the
Illustrations are a key aspect of the Masterclass in order use of the clinical concept or management strategy.
to facilitate the integration of the clinical concepts by the Thirdly, they highlight the progression in the clinical
readers. The authors are all leading clinicians and reasoning and decision-making processes underpinning
researchers in the manual therapy field. The Masterclass the concepts and the developments in clinical practice
section of Manual Therapy provides an opportunity for as a result of the increased knowledge base. In summary
these authors to present their approach to a wider this collection of Masterclasses emphasize that manual
audience. These Masterclasses therefore represent the therapy practice today is not static but a vibrant,
cutting edge of clinical practice today. expanding and innovative area of practice that is
Elsevier Science, the publishers of Manual Therapy, moving forward and is underpinned with a greater
have decided to republish selected Masterclasses in two evidence base than ever before. This is so crucial in view
books. This book features a compilation of previously of the drive today for all therapists to demonstrate
published Masterclasses on the subject of the vertebral evidence-based, efficient, effective practice.
column. The other book is a compilation of previous It is hoped that, by bringing these clinically focused
Masterclasses focusing on the peripheral joints. The articles together in a book, it will become a valuable
purpose of this initiative was to draw together topics of resource for clinicians when working in their practice or
related interest and to facilitate accessibility of these stimulate therapists when developing their own
xii
research interests. It is envisaged that it will be an The articles demonstrate the breadth of clinical
additional resource for undergraduate and post practice available to therapists today. With the
increasing emphasis placed on supporting clinical
graduate students who wish to explore this field, as well
findings with research evidence this compilation of
as for educators. Manual therapists, whatever their Masterclasses aims to fulfil that need.
professional background and area of work, are faced
with challenges every day. It is hoped that these articles
will enable them to draw on research based, current
practice so facilitating the achievement of the best
Karen Beeton
possible outcome of care for patients.
Editorial Committee Manual Therapy
SECTION 1
Cervical Spine
SECTION CONTENTS
Introduction 3
Management of cervical
Determining a cervical musculoskeletal origin to
headache symptoms 4
Conclusion 12
G. A. lull
Department of Physiotherapy, The University of
Postscript 15 Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
INTRODUCTION
is applicable. The first step to successful manage behaviour of symptoms suggestive of a role of
ment is to perform an accurate differential diagno cervical dysfunction in the pathogenesis of
sis. The diagnosis of cervical headache requires the headache. Over the past two decades in particu
presence of a pattern of symptoms and cervical lar, there has been considerable research into the
musculoskeletal signs that distinguishes it from characterization of cervical headache and a symp
headaches that may have accompanying neck ten tom complex is emerging. Some features appear
sion or pain but whose cause is elsewhere ( Henry to be quite discriminatory while others do not
et al1987). In some cases this is not a difficult task. have such high sensitivity or specificity. This prob
In others, especially the chronic benign headache ably reflects the shared access to the trigeminocer
forms inclusive of migraine without aura, tension vical nucleus by all headache forms ( Lance 1993).
headache and cervical headache, the task can be Cervical headache is classically described as an
more difficult because of the considerable sympto unilateral headache (Sjaastad et a11983) but it can
matic overlap. Additionally, cervical muscu be bilateral with often one side predominant ( Jull
loskeletal impairments have also been found in 1986a; Watson & Trott 1993). The description of a
persons with tension headache and migraine band-like, bilateral or whole head headache is
( Vernon et a11992; Kidd & Nelson 1993). Patients more typical of a tension headache ( Lance 1993).
can suffer a mixed headache form or two types of Cervical headache has side consistency (Sjaastad
headache concurrently ( Lance 1993), indicating that et al 1989a; D'Amico et al 1994). It should not
physical treatments may offer partial relief, but are change sides within or between attacks as can
not the whole solution to the patient's headache occur quite readily in migraine headaches. A
syndrome. This highlights the need for well patient reporting headaches that switch sides
defined physical criteria and a pattern of relevant should alert clinicians to a negative feature in the
physical impairment in the cervical articular, mus problem-solving process of cervical headache
cular and nervous systems to make a diagnosis of diagnosis. Cervical headache is typically associat
cervical headache. Such physical impairment ed with pain in the neck or suboccipital region
would not be present when the cervical spine has (Bogduk & Marsland 1986) but the yresence of
no major role in the aetiology of a headache form. this pain alone is not diagnostic. What is more
Treatment must address the specific impair indicative of a neck-related cause is that the onset
ments and successful outcomes rely on skilled of pain is in the neck with subsequent spread of
delivery of treatment. Consistent with the inter pain to other areas of the head. In contrast, the
national mood of demanding evidence-based onset of classical migraine has been shown to be
practices and proof of effectiveness of treatment, more typically in the head with neck pain arising
it is now mandatory that clinicians adopt or later (Sjaastad et al 1989b). The area of head pain
develop suitable symptomatic, physical and func has few distinguishing features. It is commonly
tional outcome measures and these should be uti reported in the occipital and suboccipital area,
lized in their daily clinical practice. radiating to frontal, retro-orbital or temporal
areas. This distribution reflects the greater repre
sentation of the ophthalmic division in the
DETERMINING A CERVICAL trigeminocervical nucleus (Bogduk 1994).
MUSCULOSKELETAL ORIGIN TO Furthermore, there is little relationship between
HEADACHE SYMPTOMS area of pain and segmental source of dysfunction
( Jull 1986a). In considering other musculoskeletal
causes of headache, head or face pain more in the
HISTORY AND SYMPTOMATIC
distribution of the mandibular or maxillary divi
FEATURES OF CERVICAL
sions of the trigeminal nerve should alert the clini
HEADACHE
cian to a differential examination of the
In the process of establishing the diagnosis of cer craniomandibular complex. The intensity of cervi
vical headache, the clinician seeks a pattern and cal headache can be mild, moderate or severe. It is
MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL HEADACHE 5
most commonly moderate. It can fluctuate in inten often because of time and convenience for both
sity between and even within a headache period, the patient and clinician. Rather than abandon all
which is different from migraine,which,if uncon formal outcome measures,simple outcome meas
trolled, inevitably builds up to a severe intensity ures can be used in the clinical setting. Records of
with each episode. Other symptoms may accom frequency,intensity ( VAS scale) and duration of
pany cervical headache such as nausea,lighthead headache can be kept by the patient on a daily or
edness or dizziness,or visual disturbances but they at least a weekly basis. The Neck Disability Index
are not dominant features that characterize ( Vernon & Moir 1991) or the Northwick Park Neck
headaches such as migraine with aura or cluster Pain Questionnaire ( Leak et a11994) are reliable
headaches (Sjaastad & Bovim 1991). and sensitive scales easily employed in the clin
The temporal pattern or the frequency and ical setting to monitor change in functional status.
duration of headache can be a key feature in dif
ferential diagnosis ( Lance1993) and many recur
PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT IN THE
rent headaches such as migraine,cluster and even
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM IN
tension headache have a characteristic pattern. In
CERVICAL HEADACHE
contrast,cervical headaches often lack a regular
pattern (Sjaastad1992). They are typically precip A musculoskeletal condition usually manifests in
itated by sustained neck postures or movements pain associated with physical impairments in the
but patients often have difficulty in recognizing articular, neuromuscular and nervous systems.
aggravating factors (Sjaastad et al 1983; The musculoskeletal condition of cervical
Pfaffenrath et aI1987). Stress may be a provoca headache is no exception. The confirmation of a
tive factor but this is common to many headaches musculoskeletal origin of headache as opposed to
and is not necessarily of differential diagnostic another cause requires that a pattern of relevant
assistance even though its management may be a physical impairment is present. As in many
vital aspect of a patient's treatment. Cervical headache forms, there are no reliable laboratory
headache patients often report difficulties in iden or radiological tests suitable for diagnostic use on
tifying factors that ease their headaches. Lying a widespread basis. This means that the clinical
down and resting may help as do simple anal physical examination is of primary importance.
gesics for some patients. Interestingly,it can be the Lack of clear evidence of musculoskeletal dys
lack of response to medications successful for function would suggest that the headache is not
other headache forms that may add to the picture of cervical origin.
of a cervical headache (Bovim & Sjaastad 1993; The physical examination encompasses assess
Sjaastad et aI1993). ment of the function of three systems: the articu
Onset of cervical headache can occur at any age lar system, the muscle system and neuromotor
and commonly relates to trauma, degenerative control and the nervous system. These systems are
joint disease or,with the increasingly sedentary assessed collectively through analyses of postur
nature of modern day work,to postural strains. al form and active movement tests that consider
Not all patients can identify a specific incident the range,pattern,control and pain responses to
related to headache onset and attempting to link movements in each plane. This is followed by
headaches to some traumatic incident in a more specific tests that aim to detect the precise
patient's past can be a misleading exercise. The impairments in each system. The importance of
length of history of headache is variable and often striving to have measures of relevant physical
prolonged. As occurs in most headache forms,the impairment cannot be overemphasized and cur
incidence of cervical headache is more prevalent rently they are lacking in many areas.
in females and,unlike migraine,there appears to The physical impairments in the cervical spine
be no particular familial tendency. will be discussed as pertaining to the articular,
Outcome measures suitable for research can muscle and neural systems although it is recog
sometimes be difficult to employ in a clinical setting, nized that this is an artificial division as the systems
6 CERVICAL SPINE
are highly interlinked in both normal function as reaction of the tissues to the applied manual stress
well as in a pain state. and thirdly the provocation of pain (Jull et al1988,
1994). The presence of some joint hypomobility or
hypermobility alone is not diagnostic, this being
ARTICULAR SYSTEM
found in asymptomatic populations (Jull 1986b).
The joint impairment that is pathognomonic of cer The provocation of pain and the perception of the
vical headache is painful joint dysfunction within segmental muscle reaction adding to the altered
the upper three segments ( C0-3). These are the seg segmental tissue compliance is probably a signif
ments that have access to the head via the icant cue to the examining clinician ( Jull et al
trigeminocervical nucleus (Bogduk 1994). There 1994). If this is the case, it reinforces the need for
may be associated joint dysfunction in other a skilled manual examination and one that does
regions of the cervical or thoracic spines. In the not provoke pain or discomfort due to poor han
physical examination, tests of active movement and dling skills. The latter would result in a high prob
manual examination of the cervical segments are ability of false positive results.
used to elicit this joint dysfunction and techniques In respect of outcome measures for manual
are well described in manipulative therapy texts. examination, it would be reasonable to suggest
Active movement examination can be very that the clinician formally document a qualitative
informative in some patients with respect to pain motion rating for the symptomatic joints accom
responses and the demonstration of abnormal panied by a patient self-rating pain score. Even
range or poor control of movement. However, in though studies have not shown strong interther
the context of a population whose cause of apist agreement in motion rating, that for
headache may or may not reside in cervical mus intratherapist reliability appears to be acceptable
culoskeletal dysfunction, examination of active (Schoensee et aI1995).
movements has been shown to have poor sensi
tivity to differentiate subjects with and without a
MUSCLE SYSTEM
neck complaint ( Treleaven et a11994; Sandmark &
Nisell1995). Thus a negative response in this exam The head, neck and shoulder girdle muscle sys
ination is not helpful in differential diagnosis. tem is necessarily complex, to enable the fulfil
The clinical method of manual examination has ment of its functions of generating appropriate
been used to detect symptomatic cervical joint head movements and maintaining stability of the
dysfunction in a number of studies of cervical head-neck system in any orientation for work,
headache ( Jaeger 1989; Jensen et a11990; Watson vision and hearing as well as distributing the
& Trott 1993; Beeton & Jull 1994; Dreyfuss et al forces inherent in upper limb function ( Winters &
1994; Treleaven et a11994; W hittingham et a11994; Peles1990). The neck muscles are rich in proprio
Schoensee et aI1995). Furthermore, initial studies ceptors and make important contribution to bal
have shown that it has high sensitivity and speci ance and general postural control. The muscle
ficity, enabling the detection of the presence of cer system and its neuromotor control have always
vical joint dysfunction in neck pain and headache been of interest to physiotherapists. It is known
patients ( Jull et a11988; Sandmark & Nisell1995; that with cervical joint injury and pain, there will
Jull et al 1997). This evidence would suggest that be reactions in the neuromuscular system as occur
at the present time, manual examination is the with injury to any other joint in the body. The
most appropriate clinical test to determine the challenge is to develop measures to identify and
presence of painful joint dysfunction in the dif detect the relevant dysfunctions in the neuro
ferential diagnosis of cervical headache. muscular system. Work in this area is still in its
As a clinical comment, there are three elements infancy but neck pain patients still require man
in the assessment method of manual examination. agement.
One is the perception of motion, another is the Recent work in the area of muscle dysfunction
perceived nature of tissue compliance and the in low back pain has identified impairments in
MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL HEADACHE 7
the muscle system that are linked to back pain. vidual neck muscles using contrast shifts T2
These impairments have not been in muscle weighted magnetic resonance imaging during
strength but in motor control ( Hodges & exercise. They confirmed that the more superficial
Richardson1996,1997). Specific muscles within a flexors,such as sternocleidomastoid,had a major
muscle group have been found to be dysfunc function in torque production. The deeper mus
tional ( Hides et al 1994, 1996; Hodges & cles, including longus capitis and longus colli,
Richardson 1996,1997). They are the deep mus demonstrated lesser but continued ( or tonic) activ
cles with direct vertebral attachments that span ity concomitant with a postural,supporting role.
the vertebrae and have more influence on joint This supporting role of these deep muscles has
control rather than torque production also been confirmed by Vitti et al (1973) and
( Cholewicki & McGill 1996). The anatomy and Mayoux-Benhamou et al (1994).
function of the neck region is quite different to the Of relevance to the patient with cervical
lumbar spine and a direct extrapolation from one headache and the need to identify physical impair
to the other is not possible. Yet the discoveries in ments linked to this problem, there is clinical evi
the back have given some credence to several dence that the upper and deep cervical flexors,
clinical theories in the neck and,combined with which are important muscles for cervical segmen
existing clinical,anatomical and biomechanical tal and postural control, lose their endurance
knowledge,have given direction to the develop capacity in patients with neck pain (Watson & Trott
ment of some new measures of muscle function 1993; Beeton & Jull 1994). The increased under
in the neck and scapular region, particularly in standing of the tonic supporting role of the deep
relation to deep and postural muscle that pro neck flexors and their functional differentiation
vides a supporting or tonic function. from the superficial flexors,such as sternocleido
All muscles in the head and neck region con mastoid, realized the need to develop a test that
tribute to postural control and movement in a would target these muscles in relative isolation
highly integrated and coordinated way ( Vitti et al from their superficial counterparts Gull1994). The
1973; Keshner et a11989; Keshner & Peterson1995; test is conducted in supine lying with the head
Mayoux-Benhamou et aI1997). Directed by find neck region supported in a neutral position (Fig.
ings in the back, we have had a special clinical 1.1). This test emphasizes low load to reflect the
interest in the role of the deep muscles of the neck muscles' tonic function and to assess a patient's
for joint control and support. There is a growing ability to hold an upper cervical flexion position.
realization of the importance of these deep mus The action is reasoned to recruit all the deep neck
cles. Winters & Peles (1990),in studying the inter flexors to hold the head and the cervical region in
action of several neck muscles by computer a static position. As the muscles are deep and
modelling,noted that if only the large muscles of unable to be palpated directly,an indirect quan
the neck were simulated to produce movement, tification of their ability to hold the cervical spine
this resulted in regions of local segmental insta position is gained by monitoring the steady posi
bility,particularly in near upright or neutral pos tion of the neck with an inflatable air filled pres
tures. Deep muscle activity was required to stiffen sure sensor (Stabilizer,Chattanooga South Pacific)
or stabilize the segments in functional midranges. that is positioned suboccipitally behind the neck.
Furthermore,because of the presence of the nor Lack of a contribution of the superficial neck flex
mal lordotic cervical curve, they found that con ors to the action can be monitored through surface
traction of the larger posterior muscles that span electromyography (EMG) (Fig. 1.1). Work is cur
the curve created a tendency towards buckling of rently proceeding to establish the validity of this
the spine. This highlights the importance of the test,although initial clinical data suggest that it can
cervical flexors in postural and segmental control. depict a deficit in function in patients with neck
Several authors have identified the greater role of pain. This dysfunction improves with retraining
the deep neck flexors in this function of support. and parallels a reduction in symptoms (Beeton &
Conley et al (1995) studied the function of indi- Jull1994; Grant et aI1998).
8 CERVICAL SPINE
achievement of muscle control is frequently com thought to be achievable. Care must be taken not
mensurate with pain control ( Derrick & Chesworth to work into fatigue as this will encourage substi
1992; Beeton & Jul11994; Richardson & Jull 1995). tution by other muscles. The lower trapezius and
With the knowledge that the important cervical serratus anterior are retrained using the same prin
supporting muscles,the deep neck flexors,as well ciples of improving tonic holding capacity and for
as the scapular postural supporting muscles,are mal retraining is often undertaken in the prone test
dysfunctional,activation and re-education of their position. From the outset, the patient must be
tonic supporting capacity becomes an essential taught how to assume a correct neutral upright
component of treatment from the outset to both spinal postural position that they practise repeat
relieve and control joint pain. edly during the day as part of a motor skill retrain
It should be appreciated that the effect of lack ing programme. They can incorporate training of
of support by key deep and postural muscles, their postural muscles into this routine. The only
together with the adverse stresses likely to be word of caution is that the upper cervical flexors
imposed by overactive axioscapular muscles,has and the lower trapezius are antagonistic to muscles
considerable impact on articular tissues. Some with could be hypertonic in response to sensitive
estimate of the contribution of this muscle dys neural tissues. If this is the case,exercise may either
function to the production of joint pain and proceed with considerable caution or be delayed
motion abnormality can be made in the initial clin until neural tissues are sufficiently settled.
ical examination by conducting a pre- and post In concert with active postural retraining,
muscle test assessment of the painful vertebral ergonomic and lifestyle advice should be given to
joints notably through the pain provocative pos the patient to cover their work or domestic envi
teroanterior glide technique. It is not uncommon ronments. Perpetuation of strains from these
to find clinically that joint pain is reduced and sources can hinder the progress of treatment.
motion improved following the reciprocal relax Muscle retraining and re-education of motor
ation of muscles produced as a by-product of test control should proceed through several stages.
ing the activation and holding capacities of the Co-contraction exercises can be introduced to
deep cervical and lower scapular stabilizers. This incorporate the deep cervical flexors and exten
is potent feedback to patients and enhances com sors. Rotation is an optimal resistance direction for
pliance with exercise when it is realized that this purpose and resistance should be aimed at a
retraining these muscles can relieve and control 20-30% effort in line with retraining tonic sup
their neck pain and headache. porting function. Exercise can be performed ill the
The retraining of muscle support and control is lying or the correct upright sitting posture.
a key element of management. Initially,the tonic Retraining movement patterns using the correct
holding capacity of the deep supporting and pos- synergistic action between the deep and superfi
tural muscles is trained and these muscles are tar cial neck flexors as well as re-education of the pat
geted in as much isolation as possible from other tern of axioscapular muscle sequencing during
muscles in the region in the first instance to ensure arm movements ( Janda 1994) is often necessary.
their accurate activation. The deep neck flexors are Kinaesthesia may be further trained by the patient
retrained in the supine test position with the use of moving their head and neck accurately and
feedback from the pressure sensor. A common fault repeatedly to visual targets.
is that the exercise is performed too quickly or too It is wise to reflect on the fact that the physical
strongly. The upper cervical flexion action must be changes that have developed with a prolonged his
performed slowly and precisely with the patient tory of chronic cervical headache are unlikely to
training their holding capacity at a level of pressure resolve in a week or two. The patient and clinician
increase that they can control. This exercise can also must appreciate that time and dedicated work by
be used to assist in retraining kinaesthetic sense the patient is required if a successful outcome is to
with the patient carefully targeting different pres be achieved in the long term. Efficacy of treatment
sures between 20 and 30 mmHg when these are and progress through all stages should be evaluat-
12 CERVICAL SPINE
ed by the retesting of the relevant outcome meas a clear differential diagnosis. It is necessary to have
ures. It is only by changing the physical impair clear outcome measures relevant to the history of
ments that there is a prospect of long-term relief. headache and physical impairments associated
with the condition of the cervical musculoskeletal
system. Treatment must address all impairments
CONCLUSION with the aim of relieving headaches in the long
term. A comprehensive treatment approach has
The first step towards successful management of been outlined and its efficacy is currently being
the cervical headache patient is the possession of evaluated in a formal clinical trial.
REFERENCES
Balla J, lansek R 1988 Headaches arising from disorders of Twomey LT (eds) Aspects of Manipulative Therapy, 1st
the cervical spine. In: Hopkins A (ed) Headache. Edition. Lincoln Institute of Health Sciences, Melbourne,
Problems in Diagnosis and Management. Saunders, pp 105-110
London, pp 241-267 Grant R, Jull G, Spencer T 1998 Active stabilisation training
Balster S, Jul l G 1997 Upper trapezius muscle activity in the for screen based keyboard operators - a single case
brachial plexus tension test in asymptomatic indivi duals. study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 43: 235-242
Manual Therapy 2: 144-149 Hack GD, Koritzer RT, Robinson WL, Hallgren RC,
Beeton K, Jull G 1994 Effectiveness of manipulative Greenman PE 1995 Anatomic relation between the
physiotherapy in the management of cervicogenic rectus capitis posterior minor muscle and the dura
headache: a single case study. Physiotherapy 80: mater. Spine 20: 2484-2486
417-423 Hallgren R, Greenman P, Rechtien J 1994 Atrophy of
Behrsin JF, Maguire K 1986 Levator scapulae action during suboccipital muscles in patients with chronic pain: a
shoulder movement. A possible mechanism of shoulder pilot study. Jou rnal of the American Osteopathic
pain of cervical origin. Australian Journal of Association 94: 10 32-1038
Physiotherapy 32: 10 1-10 6 Heikkila H, Anstrom P 1996 Cervicocephali c kinesthetic
Bogdu k N 1994 Cervical causes of headache and dizziness. sensibility in patients with whiplash injury. Scandinavian
In: Boyling J, Palastanga N (eds) Grieve's Modern Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 28: 133-138
Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column. Churchill Henry P, Dartigues JF, Puymirat E, Peytour TL, Lucas J
Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 317-332 1987 The association of cervicalgia-headaches: an
Bogduk N, Marsland A 1986 On the concept of third epidemiologic stu dy. Cephalalgi a 7 (Suppl 6) : 189-190
occipital headache. Journal of Neurology. Neurosurgery Herzog W, Zhang Y, Conway P, Kawchuk G 1993 Cavitation
and Psychiatry 49: 775-780 sounds during spinal manipulative treatments. Journal of
Bovim G, Sjaastad 0 1993 Cervicogenic headache: Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 16:
responses to nitroglycerin, oxygen, ergotomine and 523-526
morphine. Headache 33: 249-252 Hides J, Stokes M, Saide M, Jul l G, Cooper D 1994
Cholewicki J, McGill S 1996 Mechanical stabili ty of the in Evidence of lumbar multifidus wasting ipsilateral to
vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low symptoms in patients with acute/subacu te low back
back pain. Clinical Biomechanics 11: 1-15 pain. Spine 19: 165-177
Conley MS, Meyer RA, Bloomberg JJ, Feeback DL, Dudley Hides J, Richardson C, Jull G 1996 Multifidus mu scle
GA 1995 Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle recovery is not automatic following acute first episode
function. Spine 20: 250 5-2512 low back pain. Spine 21(23) : 2763-2769
D'Amico D, Leone M, Bussone G 1994 Side-locked Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1996 Inefficient muscul ar
u nilaterality and pain localization in long-lasting stabilisation of the lumbar spine associated with low
headaches: migraine, tension-type headache, and back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus
cervicogenic headache. Headache 34: 526-530 abdominis. Spine 21: 2640-2650
Derrick L, Chesworth B 1992 Post-motor vehicle accident Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1997 Contraction of the
alar ligament instability. Journal of Orthopaedic and abdominal muscles associated with movement of the
Sports Physical Therapy 16: 6-10 lower limb. Physical Therapy 77: 132-144
Dreyfuss P, Rogers J, Dreyer S, Fletcher D 1994 Atlanto Hu JW, Yu XM, Vernon H, Sessle BJ. 1993 Excitatory
occipital joint pain. A report of three cases and effects on neck and jaw muscle activity of inflammatory
description of an intraarticular joint block. Regional irritant applied to cervical paraspinal tissu es. Pain 55:
Anesthesia 19: 344-351 243-250
Edgar D, Jull GA, Sutton S 1994 Relationship between Hu JW, Vernon H, Tatou rian I 1995 Changes in neck
upper trapeziu s muscle length and u pper quadrant electromyography associated with meningeal noxi ous
neural tissu e extensibility. Australian Jou rnal of stimulation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiologi cal
Physiotherapy 40: 99-103 Therapeutics 18: 577-581
Elvey RL 1979 Brachial plexus tension test and the International Headache Society 1988 Classification of
pathoanatomical origin of arm pain. In: Glasgow EF, headache. Cephalalgia 8 (Suppl 7) : 1-96
MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL HEADACHE 13
Jaeger B 1989 Are cervicogenic headaches due to Loudon J, Ruhl M, Field E 1997 Ability to reproduce head
myofascial pain and cervical spine dysfunction? position after whiplash injury. Spine 22: 865-868
Cephalaegia 9: 157-164 McPartland J, Brodeur R, Hallgren R 1997 Chronic neck
Janda V 1994 Muscles and motor control in cervicogenic pain, standing balance and suboccipital muscle atrophy
disorders: Assessment and management. In: Grant R - a pilot study. Journal of Manipulative and
(ed) Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Physiological Therapeutics 20: 24-29
Spine, 2nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Revel M, Vallee C, Roudier JP,
195-216 Bargy F 1994: Longus Colli has a postural function on
Jansen J, Markakis E, Rama B, Hildebrandt J 1989 cervical curvature. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 16:
Hemicranial attacks or permanent hemicrania - a 367-371
sequel of upper cervical root compression. Cephalalgia Mayoux-Benhamou MA, Revel M, Vallee C 1997 Selective
9: 123-130 electromyography of dorsal neck muscles in humans.
Jensen OK, Nielsen FF, Vosmar L 1990 An open study Experimental Brain Research 113: 353-360
comparing manual therapy with the use of cold packs in Nansel D, Peneff A, Cremata E, Carlson J 1990 Time
the treatment of post concussional headache. course considerations for the effects of unilateral lower
Cephalalgia 10: 241-249 cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of
jull GA 1986a Headaches associated with the cervical cervical lateral-flexion passive end-range asymmetry.
spine - a clinical review. In: Grieve GP (ed) Modern Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column. Churchill 13: 297-304
Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 322-329 Nilsson N 1995 The prevalence of cervicogenic headache in
Jull GA 1986b Clinical observations of upper cervical a random population sample of 20-59 year olds. Spine
mobility. In: Grieve GP (ed) Modern Manual Therapy of 20: 1884-1888
the Vertebral Column. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh , Pfaffenrath V, Kaube H 1990 Diagnostics of cervical
pp 315-321 headache. Functional Neurology 5: 157-164
Jull G 1994 Headaches of cervical origin. In: Grant R (ed) Pfaffenrath V, Dandekar R, Pollmann W 1987 Cervicogenic
Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine, headache - the clinical picture, radiological findings and
2nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp hypothesis on its pathophysiology. Headache 27:
261-285 495-499
Jull GA, Bogduk N, Marsland A 1988 The accuracy of Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M 1991
manual diagnosis for cervical zygapophysial joint pain Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with
syndromes. Medical Journal of Australia 148: 233-236 cervical pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Jull G, Treleaven J, Versace G 1994 Manual examination: is Rehabilitation 72: 288-291
pain provocation a major cue for spinal dysfunction? Revel M, Minguet M, Gergoy P,
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 40: 159-165 Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia after a
Jull G, Zito G, Trott P, Potter H, Shirley 0, Richardson C proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients with
1997 Interexaminer reliability to detect painful upper neck pain: a randomised controlled study. Archives of
cervical joint dysfunction. Australian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75: 895-899
Physiotherapy 43: 125-129 Richardson CA, Jull GA 1995 Muscle control - pain
Jull G, Barrett C, Magee R, Ho P 1999 Further control. What exercises would you prescribe? Manual
characterisation of muscle dysfunction in cervical Therapy 1: 2-10
headache. Cephalalgia 19: 179-185 Sandmark H, Nisell R 1995 Validity of five common manual
Keshner E, Campbell 0, Katz R, Peterson B 1989 Neck neck pain provocating tests. Scandinavian Journal of
muscle activation patterns in humans during isometric Rehabilitation Medicine 27: 131-136
head stabilization. Experimental Brain Research 75: Schoensee H, Jensen G, Nicholson G, Gossman M, Katholi
335-344 C 1995 The effect of mobilisation on cervical
Keshner E, Peterson B 1995 Mechanisms controlling headaches. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical
human stabilization. 1. Head-neck dynamics during Therapy 21: 183-196
random rotations in the horizontal plane. Journal of Sjaastad 0 1992 Laterality of pain and other migraine
Neurophysiology 73: 2293-2301 criteria in common migraine. A comparison with
Kidd RF, Nelson CM 1993 Musculoskeletal dysfunction of cervicogenic headache. Functional Neurology 7:
the neck in migraine and tension headache. Headache 289-294
33: 566-569 Sjaastad 0, Bovim G 1991 Cervicogenic headache. The
Lance J 1993 Mechanisms and Management of Headache, differentiation from common migraine. An overview.
5th Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford Functional Neurology 6: 93-100
Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, Williams KA, Turner-Stokes L, Sjaastad 0, Saunte C, Hovdahl H Breivik H, Gronbaek E
Frank AO 1994 The Northwick Park neck pain 1983 Cervicogenic headache. A hypothesis. Cephalalgia
questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and 3: 249-256
disability. British Journal of Rheumatology 33: 469-474 Sjaastad 0, Fredriksen TA, Sandt Antonaci F 1989a
Lee M, Latimer J, Maher C 1993 Manipulation: investigation Unilaterality of headache in classic migraine.
of a proposed mechanism. Clinical Biomechanics 8: Cephalalgia 9: 71-77
302-306 Sjaastad 0, Fredriksen TA, Sandt 1989b The localisation of
Lord S, Barnsley L, Wallis B, Bodguk N 1994 Third occipital the initial pain of attack: a comparison between classic
headache; a prevalence study. Journal of Neurology, migraine and cervicogenic headache. Functional
Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 57: 1187-1190 Neurology 6: 93-100
14 CERVICAL SPINE
Sjaastad 0, Joubert J, Elas T, Bovim G, Vincent M 1993 muscl es: an electromyographic study. Anatomical
Hemicrania continua and cervicogenic headache. Record 177 : 471-484
Separate headache or two faces of the same headache? Watson DH, Trott PH 1993 Cervical headache. An
Functional Neurology 8: 7 9-83 investigation of natural head posture and upper cervical
Treleaven J, Jull G, Atkinson L 1 994 Cervical flexor muscle performance. Cephal algia 13: 272-284
musculoskeletal dysfunction in post-concussional White SG, Sahrmann SA 1994 A movement system balance
headache. Cephalalgia 14: 273-279 approach to management of musculo-skeletal pain. I n:
Vernon H 1989 Exploring the effect of a spinal manipulation Grant R (ed) Physical Therapy of the Cervical and
on plasma beta-endorphin levels in normal men. Spine Thoracic Spine, 2 nd Edition. Churchill Livingstone, New
14: 1272-1273 York, pp 33 9-357
Vernon H, Moir SA 1991 The Neck Disability Index: a study Whittingham W, Ellis WB, Molyneux TP 1994 The effect of
of reliabil ity and validity. Journal of Manipulative and manipulation (toggl e recoil techniques) for headaches
Physiological Therapeutics 14: 409-415 with upper cervical joint dysfunction: a pilot study.
Vernon H, Steiman I, Hagino C 1992 Cervicogenic Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
dysfunction in muscle contraction headache and 17: 3 69-37 5
migraine: a descriptive study. Journal of Manipulative Winters JM, P el es JD 1990 Neck muscle activity and 3-D
and Physiological Therapeutics 15: 418-42 9 head kinematics during quasi-static and dynamic
Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A 1994 Sudomotor changes tracking movements. In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds)
induced by neural mobilisation techniques in Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement
asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Manipulative and Organization. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 461-480
P hysiological Therapeutics 17: 66-74 Wright A 1995 Hypoalgesia post-manipulative therapy: a
Vitti M, F ujiwara M, Basmajain J, lida M 1973 The review of a potenti al neurophysiological mechani sm.
integrated rol es of longus coli and sternocleidomastoid Manual Therapy 1: 11-16
MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL HEADACHE 15
use of manual examination in the differential function found in these patients. The efficacy of
assessment of patients with chronic headache. these treatments has now been tested in a ran
There has also been further research into the domized clinical trial ( Jull et al 2002). The profile
muscle dysfunction associated with cervicogenic of patients in the study revealed that they suf
headache. Placzek et al (1999) determined that fered chronic headache ( mean history of 6.1
patients with chronic headache of likely cervical years) of moderate intensity with a mean fre
origin demonstrated less strength in cervical flex quency of 3.5 days per week. The effectiveness of
ion and extension. The notion that problems in manipulative therapy and the specific exercise
muscle control were present in the cervicogenic programme used alone and in combination were
headache patient was also introduced in this chap tested and it was determined that the two treat
ter. Further research has confirmed the presence ments significantly and similarly reduced the
of a dysfunction in the neck flexor synergy in cer headache symptoms and neck pain and the
vicogenic headache subjects,with these subjects effects were maintained in the long term (12-
having poorer performance in the craniocervical month follow-up period). These results challenge
flexion test,indicative of dysfunction in the deep the view of Sjaastad et al (1997) that physiother
neck flexors ( Jull et al 1999, 2002). A study of apy is probably only useful for patients with
whiplash subjects,in whom headache is a com minor symptoms and the benefits,if any,are only
mon complaint,revealed increased activity in the of a short-term nature.
superficial neck flexors ( sternocleidomastoid mus While knowledge of the diagnosis and suitable
cles) in association with the poorer performance treatment methods for cervicogenic headache has
in the cranio-cervical flexion test ( Jull 2000). rapidly expanded in recent years, further chal
Barton and Hayes (1996) also noted that some sub lenges are present. One pressing need is the recog
jects with cervicogenic headache had prolonged nition of those cervicogenic headache patients
EMG relaxation times in the sternocleidomastoid likely to be responsive to physiotherapy manage
muscles following cervical flexor strength tests. ment. The clinical trials have revealed that while
Additionally, Bansevicius and Sjaastad (1996) manipulative therapy and the specific exercise pro
demonstrated that cervicogenic headache subjects gramme were efficacious for the majority of sub
demonstrated increased EMG activity in the jects, 28% of subjects failed to achieve the
upper trapezius whilst performing a computer benchmark of efficacy of at least a 50% reduction in
based task requiring concentration. Thus the headache frequency. An analysis utilizing all infor
changes in muscle system function that are mation about the history and nature of headache
observed readily by the clinician are being con and physical and psychometric features was unable
firmed in research. to distinguish those subjects likely and not likely to
A programme involving manipulative therapy respond to treatment. Further research is required
and a specific exercise programme was advocat to identify other variables likely to influence out
ed for the management of cervicogenic headache, come so that physiotherapy management may,in
based on the nature of the joint and muscle dys- the future,be applied in an optimal manner.
REFERENCES
Bansevi cius D, Sj aastad 0 1996 Cervi cogenic headache: Gijsberts TJ, Duquet W, Stoekart R, Oostendorp R 1999
The influence of mental load on pain level and E MG of Pain-provocation tests for CO-4 as a tool in the diagnosis
shoulder-neck and facial muscles. Headache 36: of cervicogenic headache. Abstract. Cephalalgia 19: 436
372-378 International Headache Society Classification Committee
Barton PM, Hayes KC 1996 Neck flexor muscle strength, 1988 Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache
efficiency, and relaxation times in normal subjects and disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia
subjects with unilateral neck pain and headache. Archives 8: 9-96
of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 77: 680-687 Jull GA 2000 Deep cervical neck flexor dysfunction in
Bono G, Antonaci F, Ghirmai S, Sandrini G, Nappi G 1998 The whiplash. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 8 (1/2)
clinical profile of cervicogenic headache as it emerges 14 3-154
from a study based on the earl y diagnostic criteria Jull G, Zito G, Trott P, Potter H, Shirley D, Richardson C
(Sjaastad et al 1990) . Functional Neurology 1 3: 75-77 1997 I nter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper
MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL HEADACHE 17
cervical joint dysfunction. Australian Journal of Sjaastad 0, Fredriksen TA, Stolt-Nielsen A, Salvesen R,
Physiotherapy 43: 125-129 Jansen J, Pareja JA, Poughias LP Knuszewski P, I nan L
Jul l G, Barrett C, Magee R, Ho P 1999 Further 1997 Cervicogenic headache: A clinical review with a
characterisation of muscle dysfunction in cervical special emphasis on therapy. Functional Neurology 12:
headache. Cephalalgia 19: 179-185 305-317
Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, Zito G, Niere K, Shirley D, Emberson Van Suijlekom H, den Vet H, van den Berg S, Weber W
J, Marschner I , Richardson C 2002 A randomized 2000 Interobserver reliability in physical examination of
controlled trial of exerci se and manipulative therapy for the cervical spine i n patients with headache. Headache
cervicogenic headache. Spine 27: 1835-1843 40: 581-586
Placzek JD, Pagett BT, Roubal PJ, Jones BA, McMichael Vincent M 1998 Validation of criteria for cervicogenic
HG, Rozanski EA, Gianoto KL 1999 The influence of the headache. Functional Neurology 13: 74-75
cervical spine on chronic headache in women: A pilot Vincent MB, Luna RA 1999 Cervicogenic headache: a
study. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy; comparison with migraine and tension- type headache.
7: 33-39. Cephalalgia 19: 11-16
Sjaastad 0, Fredriksen TA, Pfaffenrath V 1998 Cervicogenic Zwart JA 1997 Neck mobility in different headache
headache: Diagnostic criteria. Headache 38: 442-445 disorders. Headache 37: 6-11
18 CERVICAL SPINE
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 19
INTRODUCTION
Movement induced in a range where resistance is detected Movement localized to one functional spinal unit
Movement localized to one or two functional spinal units Combining up to three physiological movements to place
the joint in a starting position in which further movement
Combining up to three physiological movements to place the
can be applied
joint in a starting position in which further movement can be
applied Combining passive physiological and accessory
movements
Combining passive physiological and accessory movements
Positioning of joints based on an interpretation of
Positioning of joints based on an interpretation of
symptomatology and of which joint structures are likely to
symptomatology and of which joint structures are likely to be
be tensioned in combined positions
tensioned in combined positions
Use of irregular combinations of movement
Use of normal/regular coupled movements and irregular
combinations of movement Progression of treatment by alteration of starting position
rather than by alteration of grade of movement
Progression of treatment by alteration of starting position
rather than by alteration of grade of movement Use of high-velocity, high-acceleration movement with low
amplitude
Use of low-velocity movement with low to high amplitude
articular dysfunction are identified if present. The establish the movement and combination of two
concepts of severity and irritability of the condi movements that change symptomatology most
tion are established and used to structure the significantly. These movements are termed the
examination in terms of the extent of symptom 'prime movement' and 'prime combination'
provocation that is to be produced during the respectively and represent the movements that are
physical examination. most significant in the mechanical presentation of
the condition (Fig. 2.1).
The prime movement and prime combination
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
are then examined passively using both physio
After observation of static posture, observation of logical and accessory movements (Edwards 1992;
active movement is made. This is particularly rel Maitland et aI2001). It is during this process that
evant when observing the combination of move the zygapophyseal joint demonstrating greatest
ments that the patient can perform in order to movement dysfunction is established, quality of
most significantly change their symptoms, i.e. to movement restriction felt and the relationship
reduce their pain in the case of severe pain pres between range of passive movement and symp
entation and reproduce their pain in the non tom provocation established. It is during com
severe pain presentation. This movement bined passive physiological examination that the
combination forms an important re-assessment examiner will feel if the joint dysfunction has an
marker and has been termed the patient's 'func end-feel quality that suggests an SMTT may be
tional demonstration' (Maitland et aI2001). of use.
Single-plane active movements of the spinal
region are then examined. The movements requir
CMT INTERPRETATION PRINCIPLES
ing particular attention should be evident from
the information gained from the subjective exam During and following the subjective and physical
ination and the functional demonstration. Active examination, interpretation of data should lead
movements are ranked in order of importance to the examiner to form hypotheses regarding:
24 CERVICAL SPINE
Flexion
SELECTION OF SMTT USING CMT
Following an interpretation of the examination, a
treatment plan can be formulated. Particular
SMTTs can be selected as treatment techniques
1/2 using CMT. This selection process has the advan
Left .. Right
tage of providing the manual therapist with a
..* 1/2
Very mild right
rational reasoning process that aids the integra
tion of SMTT into practice and enables SMTT to
become a technique that may be considered earli
sided neck and
supra-scapular er in the resolution of the condition rather than as
fossa pain
Extension a technique only used after a period of mobiliza
__ Prime movement (Right-lateral flexion). tion. The choice of starting position for treatment
� Prime combination (Right-lateral flexion
depends primarily on the willingness of the exam
; followed by extension). iner to reproduce symptomatology. In the first
worked example, detailed below, the rationale for
Figure 2.1 Box diagram showing a graphical method of
displaying the prime movement and combination of two the starting position and progression of treatment
movements forming the prime combination. These is detailed for a situation where symptom repro
movements are established by examining the active
duction is deemed to be acceptable.
physiological movements of the spinal region and
ranking the movements to establish the two most
significant movements in symptom reproduction. In this
case, the prime movement is right-lateral flexion, limited SYMPTOM REPRODUCTION
to half range, and the prime combination is right-lateral DEEMED ACCEPTABLE
flexion followed by extension, again limited to half
expected range. In a clinical presentation where the manual ther
apist feels it is acceptable to reproduce sympto
matology the dysfunctional joint is placed in a
• The severity and irritability of the condition starting position from which symptoms can be
(Maitland et al 2001). reproduced with passive movements applied in
• The dysfunctional movement pattern this position.
associated with the condition (Edwards 1992).
• The spinal joint that is most implicated in
PATIENT PRESENTATION
symptomatology (Edwards 1992).
• The combination of movements/positions The patient presents with very mild right-sided
that most influence symptomatology neck and supra-scapular fossa pain characteristic
(Edwards 1992). of nociceptive and somatic referred pain. The pain
• The position of structures that are likely is provoked with a prime movement of half-range,
sources of symptomatology, i.e. anterior or right-lateral flexion and a prime combination of
posterior joint structures (Edwards 1992). right-lateral flexion followed by extension of the
• The regularity or irregularity of the right C4/5. Passive movement examination
combinations of movement producing the reveals that extension performed in right-lateral
prime combination (Edwards 1992). flexion reproduces symptoms most significantly.
• The quality of the passive end-feel of the Combined movement theory suggests that the
implicated joint's prime movement and more structures anterior to the joint would be tensioned
importantly its prime combination. in this combined position. Thus, in right-lateral
• The suitability of the implicated joint for flexion and extension the passive movements that
SMTT based on the end-feel of the joint when could be applied that would further encourage an
placed in its prime combination position increase in the tension of the anterior structures
(Davis 1999). would be:
SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THRUST TECHNIQUE USING COMBINED MOVEMENT THERAPY 25
• Extension Flexion
• Right-lateral flexion
• Right rotation
• Anterior glide of C5 on C4
• Posterior glide of C4 on C5
• Right-lateral flexion SMTT in extension
Left Right
• Right rotation SMTT in extension
• Transverse SMTT to the left in right-lateral
flexion and extension.
Very mild right
sided neck
and supra
Extension scapular fossa
SMTT POSITIONING pain
When combining the three plane movements SMTT starting position (right-lateral flexion followed
required to produce the starting position for right by extension followed by left rotation).
SMTT POSITIONING
--,
Prime combination (Right-lateral flexion followed
by extension).
In order to place the joint in a position where an
SMTT can be applied without reproduction of SMTT starting position (left-lateral flexion followed
symptoms the joint must be placed in a starting L by flexion followed by right rotation).
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Anderson R, Meeker W, Wirick B, Mootz R, Kirk D, Adams Herzog W, Conway PJW, Kawchuk GN, Zhang Y, Hasler
A 1992 A meta-analysis of clinical trials of spinal EM1993 Forces exerted during spinal manipulation.
manipulation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Spine 18: 1206-1212
Therapeutics 14: 181-194 Herzog W, Scheele D, Conway PJ 1999 Electromyographic
Barker S, Kesson M, Ashmore J, Turner G, Conway J, responses of back and limb muscles associated with
Stevens D 2000 Guidance for pre-manipulative testing spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 24: 146-153
of the cervical spine. Manual Therapy 5: 37-40 Jones M 1992 Clinical reasoning in manual therapy.
Bogduk N, Mercer S 1995 Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy: Physical Therapy 72: 875-884
Clinical Science and Practice. In: Refshauge K, Gass E King CA, Bithell C 1998 Expertise in diagnostic reasoning: a
(eds) Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford comparative study. British Journal of Therapy and
Conway PJW, Herzog W, Zhang Y, Hasler EM, Ladly K 1993 Rehabilitation 5: 78-87
Forces required to cause cavitation during spinal Koes BW, Assendelft WJ, Van der Heijden GJMG, Bouter
manipulation of the thoracic spine. Clinical LM, Knipschild PG 1991 Spinal manipulation and
Biomechanics 8: 210-214 mobilization for back and neck pain: a blinded review.
Cyriax J 1941 Massage, Manipulation and Local BMJ 303: 1298-1303
Anaesthesia, 1st edn. Hamish Hamilton Medical Books, Koes B, Assendelft W, Van der Heijden G, Bouter L 1996
London Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated
Davis DG 1999 Manipulation. In: Subotnick SI (ed) Sports systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Spine 21:
Medicine of the Lower Extremity, 2nd edn. Churchill 2860-2873
Livingstone, New York, 433-454 Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K 2001
Edwards B 1987 Clinical Assessment: The use of combined Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation, 6th edn. Churchill
movements in assessment and treatment. In: Twomey Livingstone, New York
LT, Taylor JR (eds) PhYSical Therapy of the Low Back Nyberg R 1993 Manipulation: definition, types, application.
Churchill Livingstone, New York, 175-224 In: Basmajian JV, Nyberg R (Eds) Rational Manual
Edwards BC 1992 Manual of Combined Movements, 1st Therapies. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 21-47
edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Ottenbacher K, DiFabio RP 1985 Efficacy of spinal
Fraser DM 1976 Post-partum backache: a preventable manipulation/mobilisation therapy: a meta-analysis.
condition? Canadian Family Physician 22: 1434-1439 Spine 10: 833-837
Grieve GP 1991 Mobilization of the Spine: A Primary Rupert RL, Wagnon R, Thompson P, Ezzeldin MT 1985
Handbook of Clinical Method, 5th edn. Edinburgh, Chiropractic adjustments: Results of a controlled clinical
Churchill Livingstone trial in Egypt. International Review of Chiropractic.
Haldeman S 1978 The clinical basis for discussion of the Winter 58-60
mechanics of manipulation. In: Korr I (Ed) The Wright A 1995 Hypoalgesia post-manipulative therapy: a
Neurobiologic Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy. review of a potential neurophysiological mechanism.
Plenum Press, London, p.53 Manual Therapy 1: 16
Hartman LS 1985 Handbook of Osteopathic Technique, 2nd Zusman M 1986 Spinal manipulative therapy: Review of
edn. Unwin Hyman, London some proposed mechanisms and a new hypothesis.
Herzog W 2000 Clinical Biomechanics of Spinal Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 32: 89-99
Manipulation. Churchill Livingstone, New York
SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THRUST TECHNIQUE USING COMBINED MOVEMENT THERAPY 29
Flexion
Non-severe,
nociceptive,
Extension right-sided
low back pain
inferior level. Thus, if the method of describing performing a typical rotation technique in left side
intersegmental movement, which is used to lying, right rotation is actually being induced - a
describe cervical and thoracic movement, is applied procedure that has conventionally been labelled as
to the lumbar spine it effectively means that when a left rotation technique by some clinicians.
SECTION 2
Thoracic Spine
SECTION CONTENTS
Introduction 33
Anatomy 34
Rotational instability of
Biomechanics of rotation 35
the midthoracic spine:
Definition of instability 36
assessment and
Clinical tests for lateral translation stability
(rotation) 37 management
Subjective and physical findings 38
D. G. Lee
Treatment 39 Orthopaedic Division of the Canadian Physiotherapy
Association, Delta Orthopaedic Physiotherapy Clinic,
Conclusion 41
Delta, British Columbia, Canada
Postscript 43
INTRODUCTION
ANATOMY
Figure 3.1 Anterolateral view of the fourth thoracic
vertebra. Note the concave facet on the transverse
The thorax can be divided into four regions process for articulation with the fourth rib as well as the
according to anatomical and biomechanical dif two demi-facets on the lateral aspect of the vertebral
body for articulation with the heads of the fourth and fifth
ferences. The midthorax is the topic of this paper ribs. Reproduced with kind permission from Diane G. Lee
and includes the T3 to T7 vertebrae, the third to Physiotherapist Corporation from Lee (1994b).
seventh ribs and the sternum.Rotational instabil
ity of the thorax is most common in this region. A
brief anatomical review is relevant in order to 1989). In the skeletally mature,the costovertebral
understand the normal mechanics and patho joint is divided into two synovial cavities sepa
mechanics of rotation in the midthorax. rated by an intra-articular ligament. Several lig
The facets on both the superior and inferior aments support the costovertebral complex,
articular processes of the thoracic vertebra are including the radiate, costotransverse or inter
curved in both the transverse and sagittal planes osseous ligament, la teral costotransverse liga
(Davis 1959). This orientation permits multidi ment and the superior costotransverse ligament.
rectional movement and does not restrain, nor Attenuation of some of these ligaments occurs
direct,any coupling of motion when the thorax when the midthorax is unstable.
rotates. Neither do they limit the amount of The anatomy and age-related changes of the
lateral translation that occurs in conjunction intervertebral disc in the thorax have received recent
with rotation (Panjabi et al 1976). The ventral study. Crawford (1995) investigated a series of 51
aspect of the transverse process contains a deep, cadavers aged from 19 to 91 years and tabulated the
concave facet for articulation with the rib of the incidence and location of degeneration, Schmorl's
same number (Fig. 3.1). This curvature influ nodes and posterior intervertebral disc prolapse.
ences the conjunct rotation that occurs when The midthoracic region was found to have the high
the rib glides in a superoinferior direction. A est incidence of degenerated discs and interverte
superior glide is associated with anterior rota bral prolapses. Wood et al (1995) found that 73% of
tion of the rib; an inferior glide is associated with 90 asymptomatic individuals had positive anatom
posterior rotation. ical findings at one or more levels of the thoracic
The posterolateral corners of both the superi spine on magnetic resonance imaging. These find
or and inferior aspects of the vertebral body con ings included herniation, bulging, annular tears,
tain an ovoid demifacet for articulation with the deformation of the spinal cord and Scheuermann
head of the rib.Development of the superior cos end-plate irregularities. While structural changes
tovertebral joint is delayed until early adoles are common, their clinical consequences are
cence (Penning & Wilmink 1987; Williams et al unknown. It is hypothesized (Lee 1993, 1994a,b)
ROTATIONAL INSTABILITY OF THE MIDTHORACIC SPINE: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 35
Figure 3.3 The biomechanics proposed to occur in the midthorax during right rotation of the trunk. Reproduced by
permission from Lee 2003.
Figure 3.5 Passive mobility test for right lateral translation of T5 and the sixth ribs. Reproduced with kind permission
from Diane G. Lee Physiotherapist Corporation from Lee (1994b).
38 THORACIC SPINE
Next, the stability of the T5-6 spinal component compressing the ribs centrally towards their cos
can be evaluated by restricting the sixth ribs from tovertebral joints (small arrows Fig. 3.6). The TS
gliding relative to their transverse processes and vertebra is translated through the thorax purely in
then applying a lateral translation force. No the transverse plane. The quantity of motion, the
motion should occur when the ribs are fixed. This reproduction of any symptoms and the end feel of
test stresses the anatomical structures that resist motion is noted and compared with the levels
horizontal translation between two adjacent ver above and below. When the segment is stable, no
tebrae when the ribs between them are fixed. A motion should occur. When unstable, the same
positive response is an increase in the quantity of degree of motion previously noted in the mobility
motion and a decrease in the resistance at the end test can be palpated.
of the range. To test the TS-6 segment, the patient
is sitting with the arms crossed to opposite shoul
ders (Fig. 3.6). With the right hand/arm, the tho SUBJECT IVE AND PHYS ICAL
rax is palpated such that the fifth finger of the FIND INGS
right hand lies along the fifth rib. With the left
hand, T6 and the sixth ribs are fixed bilaterally by Rotational instability of the midthorax can occur
when excessive rotation is applied to the unre
strained thorax or when rotation of the thorax is
forced against a fixed rib cage (seat belt injury). At
the limit of right rotation in the midthorax, the
superior vertebra has translated to the left, the left
rib has translated posterolaterally and the right rib
has translated anteromedially. Further right rota
tion results in a right lateral tilt of the superior ver
tebra (Fig. 3.4). Fixation of the superior vertebra
occurs when the left lateral translation exceeds the
physiological motion barrier and the vertebra is
unable to return to its neutral position.
Initially, the patient complains of localized, cen
tral midthoracic pain that can radiate around the
chest wall. The pain may be associated with
numbness along the related dermatome.
Sympathetic symptoms, including sensations of
local coldness, sweating, burning and visceral
referral, are common. If the unstable complex is
fixated at the limit of rotation, very little relieves
the pain. All movements, especially contralateral
rotation, and sustained postures tend to aggravate
the pain. If the complex is not fixed, the patient
often finds that contralateral rotation and exten
sion affords some relief.
Positionally, the following findings are noted
when TS-6 is fixated in left-lateral translation and
right rotation (right rotational instability). TS-T6 is
right rotated in hyperflexion, neutral and extension,
Figure 3.6 Passive stability test for right lateral
the right sixth rib is anteromedial posteriorly and
translation of TS-6 with the sixth ribs fixed. Reproduced
with kind permission from Diane G. Lee Physiotherapist the left sixth rib is posterolateral posteriorly. All
Corporation from Lee (1994b). active movements produce a 'kink' at the level of
ROTAT IONAL INSTABILITY OF THE MIDTHORACIC SPINE: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 39
the fixation; the worst movement is often rotation tests will reveal excessive left-lateral translation.
(Fig. 3.7). The passive accessory mobility tests for When the sixth ribs are compressed medially into
the zygapophyseal and costotransverse joints are the vertebral body of T5,there should be no lat
reduced but present. The right-lateral translation eral translation of T5 relative to T6. When the
mobility test is completely blocked. segment is unstable,excessive motion during this
Prior to reduction of the fixation,the left-later test is noted.
al translation stability test of T5-6 is normal Segmental atrophy of multifidus can be palpat
because the joint is stuck at the limit of left-lateral ed bilaterally. In the lumbar spine,Hides et al (1994)
translation. After the fixation is reduced, the found wasting and local inhibition at a segmental
stability test reveals the underlying excessive left level of the lumbar multifidus muscle in all patients
lateral translation. The reduction restores the with a first episode of acute/subacute low back
complex to a neutral position from which the pain. In a follow-up study Hides et al (1995) found
amplitude of left-lateral translation can be more that without therapeutic intervention,multifidus
effectively measured. did not regain its original size or function and the
If the segment is not fixated at the limit of later recurrence rate of low back pain over an 8-month
al translation,then both the mobility and stability period was very high. They also found that the
deficit could be reversed with an appropriate exer
cise programme. This research is consistent with
clinical observation of instability in the midthorax.
TREATMENT
Figure 3.8 Manipulation technique for reduction of a fixated left-lateral shift of T5 and the sixth ribs relative to T6.
Strong distraction must be maintained throughout the technique. Reproduced with kind permission from Diane G. Lee
Physiotherapist Corporation from Lee (1994b).
through the thorax to the motion barrier. Strong Essentially, the patient is taught to specifical
longitudinal distraction is applied through the ly recruit the segmental muscles isometrically
thorax prior to the application of a high-velocity, and then concentrically while prone over a gym
low-amplitude thrust. The thrust is in a lateral ball (Fig. 3.10). Electrical stimulation can be a
direction in the transverse plane (Fig. 3.8). The useful adjunct at this time. In sidelying, specific
goal of the technique is to laterally translate T5 segmental rotation can be resisted by the thera
and the left and right sixth ribs relative to T6. pist, both concentrically and eccentrically, to
Following reduction of the fixation,the thorax is facilitate the return of multifidus function. The
taped (Fig. 3.9) to remind the patient to avoid end programme is progressed by increasing the load
range rotation. Stabilization is then required. the thorax must control. Initially,scapular motion
If the segment is not fixated, stabilization is is introduced,especially in lower trapezius work.
begun immediately. Physiotherapy cannot restore The patient must control the neutral position of
form closure; therefore,the emphasis of treatment the midthorax throughout the scapular depres
must be on the restoration of force closure. The sion. The goal is to teach the patient to isolate
goal is to reduce the dynamic neutral zone during scapular motion from spinal motion so that the
functional activities and to avoid the end ranges scapula does not produce spinal motion during
of rotation, thus limiting the chances of fixation. activities involving the arm. Once control is
This is accomplished through specific exercises gained over the scapula,exercises involving the
augmented with muscle stimulation and elec entire upper extremity may be added. By increas
tromyography. The first group of muscles that ing the lever arm and then the load,the midtho
must be addressed are the transversospinal (mul rax is further challenged. Gymnastic ball,
tifidus) and erector spinae groups. proprioceptive, balance and resistive work can
ROTATIONAL INSTABILITY OF THE MIDTHORACIC SPINE: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGE MENT 41
REFERENCES
Crawford RJ 1995 Normal and degenerative anatomy of Hides JA, Richardson CA, Juli GA 1995 Multifidus inhibition
thoracic intervertebral discs. Proceedings of the 9th in acute low back pain: recovery is not spontaneous.
Biennial Conference of the Manipulative Physiotherapists Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the
Association of Australia. Gold Coast, Queensland, 24-29 Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia.
Davis PR 1959 The medial inclination of the human thoracic Gold Coast, Queensland, 57-60
intervertebral articular facets. Journal of Anatomy 93: Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1995a Neuro-motor
68-74 dysfunction of the trunk musculature in low back pain
Hides JA, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Juli GA, Cooper DH 1994 Patients. Proceedings of the World Confederation of
Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral Physical Therapists Congress, Washington
to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1995b Dysfunction of
pain. Spine 19(2): 165-172 transversus abdominis associated with chronic low back
42 THORACIC SPINE
pain. Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference of the Palastanga N (eds) Grieve's Modern Manual Therapy,
Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia. 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgh, pp 705-720
Gold Coast, Queensland, 61-62 Richardson CA, Jull GA 1995 Muscle control - pain
Lee DG 1993 Biomechanics of the thorax: a clinical model control. What exercises would you prescribe? Manual
of in vivo function. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 1 (1): 2-10
Therapy 1(1): 13-21 Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R 1992 Transfer of
Lee DG 1994a Biomechanics of the thorax. In: Grant R (ed) Lumbosacral Load to Iliac Bones and Legs. Part I:
Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine, Biomechanics of Self-bracing of the Sacroiliac Joints
2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 47-64 and its Significance for Treatment and Exercise. In:
Lee DG 1994b Manual therapy for the thorax - a Vleeming A, Mooney V, Snijders CJ, Dorman T (eds)
biomechanical approach. Delta Orthopaedic First Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back Pain
Physiotherapy Clinic, 301 11950 80th Ave, Delta, BC and its Relation to the Sacroiliac Joint. San Diego, CA,
V4C 1Y 2 Nov. 5-6, pp 233-254
Lowcock J 1990 Thoracic joint stability and clinical stress Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ 1990a
tests. Proceedings of the Canadian Orthopaedic Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac
Manipulative Physiotherapists, Orthopaedic Division of joint. Part 1: Clinical anatomical aspects. Spine 15(2):
the Canadian Physiotherapy Association Newsletter 130-132
November/December 1991: 15-19 Vleeming A, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R 1990b
Panjabi MM 1992a The stabilizing system of the spine. Part Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac
I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. joint. Part 2: Biomechanical aspects. Spine 15(2):
Journal of Spinal Disorders 5(4): 383-389 133-135
Panjabi MM 1992b The stabilizing system of the spine. Part Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, Mens JMA 1995 A
II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. Journal of New Light on Low Back Pain. In: Vleeming A, Mooney
Spinal Disorders 5(4): 390-397 V, Dorman T, Snijders CJ (eds) Second Interdisciplinary
Panjabi MM, Brand RA, White AA 1976 Mechanical World Congress on Low Back Pain. San Diego, CA,
properties of the human thoracic spine. Journal of Bone Nov. 9-11, 149-168
and Joint Surgery 58A: 642-652 Williams P, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH 1989 Grays
Penning L, Wilmink JT 1987 Rotation of the cervical spine Anatomy. 37th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
- A CT study in normal subjects. Spine 12(8): 732-738 Wood KB, Garvey TA, Gundry C, Heithoff KB 1995
Richardson CA, Jull GA 1994 Concepts of Assessment and Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine.
Rehabilitation for active lumbar stability. In: Boyling JD, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 77A(11): 1631-1637
ROTATIONAL INSTABILITY OF THE MIDTHORACIC SPINE: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 43
Figure 3.11 When a patient has a rotational instability of Figure 3.12 The Prone Arm Lift test is repeated whilst
the midthorax and lacks dynamic control, the segment the therapist applies compression of the ribs towards the
can be seen to laterally translate and rotate during the midline at the level of the rotational instability. Any
Prone Arm Lift test. change in effort and/or pain is noted.
ROTATIONAL INSTABILITY OF THE MIDTHORACIC SPINE: ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 45
anism. Once the patient is taught to isolate the appropriate motor control retraining. Although
local stabilizers,the tests can also be used to pre these tests appear to be effective clinically, they
dict if rehabilitation is likely to be successful with remain to be validated scientifically.
REFERENCES
Bergmark A 1989 Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in the load transfer function of the pelvic girdle. In:
mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C,
230 (60): 20 Stoeckart R (eds) Movement, Stability and Low Back
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL 2001 Movement and stability Pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
dysfunction - contemporary developments. Manual Mens JMA, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ, Ginai AZ.
Therapy 6(1): 15-25 1999 The active straight leg raising test and mobility of
Franklin E 1996 Dynamic alignment through imagery. the pelvic joints. European Spine 8: 468
Human Kinetics Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC 2002 Deep and
Lee DG 2001 Imagery for Core Stabilization - an educational superficial fibres of the lumbar multifidus muscle are
video. DGL Physiotherapist Corp., www.dianelee.ca differentially active during voluntary arm movements.
Lee DG 2003a The Thorax - An Integrated Approach. DGL Spine 27(2): E29
Physiotherapist Corp., www.dianelee.ca Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, Damen L, Pas MS,
Lee LJ 2003b Restoring force closure/motor control of the Storm J 2002 The relationship between the transversely
thorax. In: Lee DG (ed) The Thorax - An Integrated oriented abdominal muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics
Approach. DGL Physiotherapist Corp., www.dianelee.ca and low back pain. Spine 27(4): 399-405
Mens JMA, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ 1997
Active straight leg raising test: a clinical approach to
46 THORACIC SPINE
SECTION 3
Lumbar spine
SECTION CONTENTS
Introduction 49
Muscle control-pain
Mechanisms for muscular support of the lumbar
motion segment 50
INTRODUCTION
ability of such programmes to improve stabiliza prior to a given movement. For example, during a
tion of the lumbar spine has been difficult to eval jumping task, the leg extensor muscles are recruit
uate because of a lack of appropriate measurement ed prior to ground contact in preparation for the
methods. Current programmes consist of a variety forces of landing ( Gollhofer & Kyrolainen 199 1).
of general trunk and girdle exercises and, for the The regulation of muscle stiffness is also impor
most part, they seem to have had some success tant for the stabilization of joints (Johansson et al
( Saal & Saal 1989). However, within these general 199 1). A mechanism for increasing joint stability
programmes, it is difficult to ascertain which par through enhanced muscle stiffness is co-contrac
ticular features of the exercise tasks or facilitation tion of agonist and antagonist muscles that lie on
techniques are responsible for the more successful each side of a joint ( Andersson & Winters 199 0).
outcomes in some patients compared to others. Recruiting muscles in co-contraction is considered
Therefore, it is sometimes difficult for the clinician to provide support and joint stabilization even
to know where to place the emphasis in their when contractions occur at very low levels. Hoffer
retraining of a back pain patient. & Andreassen ( 198 1) contend that contractions as
Our work with spinal pain patients both in the low as 25 % maximum voluntary contraction
clinic and in the laboratory has led to the develop (MV C) are able to provide maximal joint stiffness.
ment of some quite specific exercise techniques for In addition, feedback from the joint and ligament
the rehabilitation of lumbar segmental control. afferents, via their effects on the gamma spindle
Research is beginning to vindicate these approach system, may help regulate muscle stiffness
es. In presenting these particular exercise tech (Johansson et al 199 1). This occurs through the
niques, it is appropriate to consider several issues. gamma system's influence on the alpha motor neu
These include the mechanisms involved in provid rones, which control the tonic, slow twitch muscle
ing muscle support for the lumbar motion segment fibres (Johansson & Sojka 199 1). It appears that the
and why muscle control is needed to enhance seg tonic motor units are those most closely related to
mental stabilization in back pain patients. It is also the control of joint stabilization. This is commen
necessary to understand which muscles are vital surate with the proposed antigravity postural sup
for segmental stabilization as well as those which porting role attributed to these motor units.
demonstrate dysfunction in back pain patients. A major advance in our understanding of how
This provides a basis for identifying features to con muscles contribute to lumbar stabilization came
sider in exercise design for specific methods of from recognizing the significant functional differ
rehabilitation of active lumbar segmental control. ence between local and global muscles. Bergmark
( 1989), in his dissertation on lumbar spine stabil
ity, proposed a difference between local and glob
MECHANISMS FOR MUSCULAR al muscles. Global describes the large
SUPPORT OF THE LUMBAR MOTION torque-producing muscles linking the pelvis to the
SEGMENT thoracic cage. Their role is to provide general
trunk stabilization. Such muscles balance external
The muscle system, in its function of stability, pro loads and in that way help minimize the resulting
vides protection to articular structures. It can help forces on the spine. Local muscles refer to those
minimize unwanted joint displacement, aid stress attaching directly to the lumbar vertebrae. These
absorption and generally prolong the 'cartilage muscles are considered to be responsible for seg
serving time' of the joint ( Baratta et aI 1988). mental stability as well as controlling the positions
The development of active joint stabilization of the lumbar segments.
has been attributed to several muscle recruitment
strategies. One strategy is the early pre-pro
LUMBAR SEGMENTAL STABILITY
grammed recruitment of particular muscles.
Specific muscles are recruited before an action is Lumbar segmental stability is provided by osseous,
commenced to ensure that the joint is supported ligamentous and muscle restraints. Injury and
MUSCLE CONTROL-PAIN CONTROL. WHAT EXERCISES WOULD YOU PRESCRIBE? 51
degenerative disease can affect any structure of the and extension ( Hodges & Richardson 199 7). The
motion segment and can result in both abnormal onset of EMG activity for transversus abdominis
segmental movement and muscle dysfunction. occurred prior to any limb movement. Additionally
Panjabi ( 1992) considers the segment's neutral zone the pattern of onset was similar for each of the three
to be the sensitive region. This is the small range of directions of arm movement. This was different
displacement around the segment's neutral posi from the activity pattern of other abdominal mus
tion where little resistance is offered by passive cles. The rectus abdominis and external and inter
spinal restraints. The subtle movement in this nal oblique muscles rarely preceded limb
region may increase with injury, disc degeneration movement, and the onset of their activity varied
and weakness of the muscles (Panjabi 1992). with the movement direction. The authors con
Logically it is the muscles of the local system, cluded that in regard to stabilization of the lumbar
which have direct attachments to the lumbar ver spine, this study provided evidence for a function
tebrae, that have the greatest capacity to affect seg al differentiation between the abdominal muscles.
mental stiffness through control of the neutral zone The local muscle system has a primary respon
( Crisco & Panjabi 1990). The contributions of sev sibility for segmental stability. It appears that both
eral of the back muscles to active segmental stabi multifidus and transversus abdominis are impor
lization have been investigated in in vitro studies tant components of this system.
(Panjabi et a11989; Goel et al 199 3; Steffen et al 1994;
Wilke et aI 1995). The lumbar multifidus, in partic
DYSFUNCTIONS IN THE LOCAL
ular, has been shown to contribute to the control of
MUSCLE SYSTEM
the neutral zone. In a biomechanical study Wilke et
al ( 199 5) demonstrated that the multifidus provid The stabilization function of any antigravity trunk
ed more than two thirds of the stiffness increase at muscle is likely to be affected in low back pain
the lA-5 segment. This stabilizing role of multifidus patients. Their tonic fibres have an important anti
has been recently verified in vivo in animal research gravity, postural supportive role. These fibres can
( Kaigle et aI 1995). be affected by disuse (Richardson & Jull 1994) and
The abdominal muscles are often ascribed an by the reflex and pain inhibition associated with
important role in the treatment of back pain. A lumbar pain and injury ( Baugher et al 1984). The
muscle that could be described as part of the local nature of this dysfunction impacts on the type of
system, and which has not been studied exten exercise required to restore this stabilizing or sup
sively to date, is the transversus abdominis. Its porting role.
possible importance in lumbar stabilization was A link has been established between dysfunc
first addressed by Cresswell et al ( 1992). These tion in the local muscles and back pain. Several
researchers studied the muscles of the back and researchers have demonstrated dysfunctions in
abdominal wall using fine wire electromyography the multifidus muscle of back pain patients. Hides
( EMG). They demonstrated that the transversus et al ( 1994) reported a significant reduction in
abdominis had direct links with the development segmental multifidus cross-sectional area in
of intra-abdominal pressure. Furthermore this patients with acute, first episode, unilateral back
muscle contracted with all trunk movements pain. It was proposed that this phenomenon was
regardless of the primary direction of movement a result of pain and or reflex inhibition of the mus
and it was recruited prior to all other abdominal cle. Rantanen et al ( 199 3) demonstrated 'moth
muscles with sudden perturbations of the trunk. eaten' Type I muscle fibres in the multifidus mus
Recently, more concrete evidence has emerged cle of patients with chronic back pain. Further evi
demonstrating the importance of transversus abdo dence comes from Biederman et al ( 199 1), who
minis in the motor control associated with lumbar found that multifidus demonstrated greater
stabilization. Fine wire and surface EMG were used fatiguability relative to other parts of the erector
to study each abdominal muscle during three spinae in chronic back pain patients compared
movements of the upper limb: flexion, abduction with a normal population.
52 LUMBAR SPINE
Dysfunction of the transversus abdominis mus of EMG studies (Jull et a1 199 3; Richardson et al
cle has also been clearly shown in back pain 199 0, 199 2, 1995).
patients. Hodges and Richardson (1995) demon
strated a motor control deficit in the this muscle.
TYPE OF MUSCLE CONTRACTION
In their EMG experiment analyzing the onset of
activity of the muscles of the abdominal wall in Functional differences between the global and
response to arm movements, the timing of onset local muscle systems help direct which type of
of transversus abdominis activity was delayed in muscle contraction is needed in re-education of
chronic low back pain sufferers compared with the local system. The length-tension relation
individuals who had never experienced back pain. ships of the muscles involved differ during trunk
Notably no significant change was detected movements. The global muscles span the lumbar
between the two groups in any other muscle of the area and they shorten or lengthen eccentrically
abdominal wall. The delayed action of transver as they produce the torque to move the trunk.
sus abdominis compared with its early recruit The local muscles attach from vertebra to verte
ment prior to limb movement in normal bra and are responsible for maintaining the posi
individuals has made a significant contribution to tion of the lumbar segments during functional
knowledge of the mechanisms involved in poor trunk movement. McGill (199 1 ) confirmed their
lumbar stabilization associated with low back primary segmental stabilization role in a study
pain. The results are even more significant when of the geometry of the multifidus muscle. He
one considers that the problem appears to be lim showed that the operational length of multifidus
ited to the muscle that forms the deepest layer of was virtually unchanged through a range of
the abdominal wall. trunk postures.
Evidence of the importance of the local muscles These functional demands indicate that iso
in stabilization of the lumbar spine, as well as their metric exercise is most beneficial for re-educating
proven dysfunction in the back pain population, the stabilizing role of these deep local muscles of
has led us to focus on these muscles in the reha the lumbar spine. At a later stage, isometric exer
bilitation of active stabilization of the lumbar cises for these deep lumbar muscles can be com
spine. Indeed, a completely new type of thera bined with dynamic functional exercise for other
peutic exercise has been developed aimed at parts of the body.
reversing the dysfunction known to occur in the Exercise involving co-contraction of the deep
local muscle system. abdominal and back muscles is also in line with
stabilization. Co-contraction of agonist and antag
onist has been considered by several researchers
EXERCISE DESIGN in relation to joint stabilization strategies
(Andersson & Winters 1990). This type of muscle
In the process of developing a new concept in activity is linked to increasing joint stiffness and
therapeutic exercise to enhance lumbar stabi support independent of the torque-producing role
lization, each facet of the exercise was reasoned of muscles (Carter et aI 199 3). A simultaneous iso
on a knowledge of stabilization, as well as a metric co-contraction of transversus and multi
knowledge of the muscle dysfunction found in fidus, while maintaining the spine in a static
back pain patients. Several decisions had to be neutral position, should help re-educate the sta
made to design the most suitable exercise. These bilizing role of these muscles.
included the type of muscle contraction (i.e. con As argued previously, the tonic motor units are
centric, eccentric, isometric), the body position, those most closely related to control of joint stabil
the level of resistance or load, the number of rep ization. In addition, both disuse and reflex inhibi
etitions and subsequently the methods of pro tion are likely to affect the slow twitch or tonic
gression. These decisions were based on fibre function within the muscle. Therefore a pro
extensive work in the clinic as well as a number longed tonic-holding contraction at a low level of
MUSCLE CONTROL-PAIN CONTROL. WHAT EXERCISES WOULD YOU PRESCRIBE? 53
MV C would be most effective in retraining the sta enhancing spinal stability. Therefore, the addition
bility function of these muscles. of high external loading, which is required for
In summary, the evidence presented indicates strength changes, is not suitable for the develop
that a programme for the transversus abdominis ment of muscle stiffness for joint support. For these
and multifidus is required for specific lumbar seg reasons, positions and exercises involving minimal
mental stabilization training. It should include external loading are ideal when rehabilitating the
activating an isometric co-contraction of these local muscles for lumbar spine stabilization.
muscles and training the patient to hold a low
level tonic contraction. There is one other factor in
NUMBER OF REPETITIONS,
exercise design. There are patients in whom the
HOLDING ABILITY
more active global muscles, such as rectus abdo
minis, external oblique or thoracic erector spinae, A localized and specific isometric-setting exercise
predominate in general exercise techniques. In was developed to improve the stability role of the
these patients it is almost impossible to detect if local muscles. This isometric co-contraction of
local muscle activation is occurring during gener transversus and multifidus involves retraining a
al exercise. Therefore, specific exercises that iso specific motor skill. In order to gain maximum
late the local muscles as much as possible from benefit, the exercise needs to be repeated as many
contraction of the global muscles have proved to times as possible throughout the day.
be the most beneficial way of targeting them in
rehabilitation programmes and ensuring that the
METHODS OF PROGRESSION
correct musdes are being reactivated.
Progression of this new type of exercise can be
taken through several stages. At first, it involves
BODY POSITION AND LEVEL OF
increasing the holding time of the isometric co-con
RESISTANCE
traction as well as the number of repetitions. The
The local muscles function to control segmental setting exercise can then be progressed from low
stiffness independent of the global muscle system, loads with minimal body weight to more functional
which is responsible for balancing the external body positions with gradually increasing external
loads. There is no need for high loaded exercise loads. In addition, advances need to be made from
and it is logical to reduce external loading during performing the exercise with a static neutral lum
initial rehabilitation of the local system. This is bar spine to other static positions at greater
achieved by using exercise positions, such as four extremes of range. Finally, patients should be able
point kneeling or prone lying, where body weight to hold a co-contraction of the deep muscles dur
is supported and no additional external resistance ing dynamic functional movements of the trunk.
is applied. Such positions and exercises involving
minimal external loading also reduce the chance
of pain and reflex inhibition, which could be SPECIFIC METHODS OF
increased if high-load exercises were given early REHABILITATION
in rehabilitation.
Low loads have another benefit in therapeutic Teaching the isolated setting action of transversus
exercise aimed at restoring joint stabilization. The abdominis and multifidus is not easy when patients
restoration of tonic function in the muscles only have marked dysfunction in their local muscle sys
requires low levels of muscle contraction as tonic tem. The therapist needs to develop a high level of
fibres operate at levels below approximately teaching skill for successful treatments. For this rea
30-40% MV C ( McArdle et aI 1 991 ). Additionally it son quite detailed descriptions of the exercise pro
has been argued that only low levels of muscle gramme will be given. As with all therapeutic
force, approximately 25% MVC, are needed to exercise, methods have to be used to detect if the
develop the increased muscle stiffness required for correct muscles are contracting during the exercise.
54 LUMBAR SPINE
The dysfunction occurs in the deep muscles of the Several different phrases such as 'draw your
abdominal wall and back and this can present lower abdomen up and in' or 'pull your
some challenges, especially in patients whose more navel up towards your spine' can be used to
active global muscles attempt to substitute for the cue the patient to the muscle action required.
correct muscle action. Several strategies, including • Focusing on precision. The patient has to
specific palpation, careful observation of changes concentrate and focus on the precise muscle
in body shape and the use of pressure biofeedback, action to be achieved. It should be stressed
have been developed for this purpose. that the co-activation of the deep muscles is a
gentle action. Other muscles of the body are
to remain relaxed during this localized
METHODS OF TEACHING AN
exercise.
ISOMETRIC CO-CONTRACTION OF
• Facilitation techniques. Such techniques can
TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS AND
help the patient to feel the muscle action
MULTIFIDUS WITH A STATIC
required. These can include a deep but gentle
NEUTRAL SPINE
manual pressure on the transversus
There are only a few methods of achieving an iso abdominis or manual contact on multifidus.
metric co-contraction of the local muscles inde Another facilitation strategy is to combine the
pendently of the global muscles. The method we co-contraction with a contraction of pelvic
have developed from our clinical and research floor muscles.
work involves the re-education of the co-contrac
tion of transversus abdominis and multifidus as
BODY POSITIONS FOR
the basic functional unit of a movement skill. The
RE-EDUCATION
isolated action of these local muscles is taught by
asking the patient to gently draw in the abdomi There are several different positions in which the
nal wall, especially in the lower abdominal area. isometric co-contraction exercise can be activated
This is an action similar to that described by whilst keeping the global muscles relaxed and
Lacote et al (198 7) for the muscle test action of the maintaining the spine in a static neutral position.
transversus abdominis muscle. The patient also Each position allows different opportunities for
learns to simultaneously contract their multifidus teaching, testing and retraining this technique. Re
muscle in an isometric setting action. This ensures education of the isometric co-contraction is com
the maintenance of a static neutral spine position. menced in the four point kneeling and prone
Active persons without a history of chronic low positions. One of the major advantages of these
back pain have little difficulty in performing this positions, as is revealed when monitoring the
task (Richardson et al1995). However, it is not eas abdominal wall with multichannel EMG, is that
ily achieved by patients with low back pain, both they seem to be inhibitory for a major global mus
acute and chronic. If the patient is unable to per cle, the rectus abdominis. These positions help to
form the setting action, other techniques of facili isolate the exercise to the deep local muscles.
tation and skill learning are employed. These
include:
Re-education in four point kneeling
• V isualizing the correct muscle action. The
The first position for the patient to learn to con
local muscles form a corset-like structure that
tract their local muscles is in four point kneeling
acts to tighten around the waist. The
(Figs 4.1A & B). Learning the action of drawing in
physiotherapist should demonstrate and
the abdominal wall and holding this position is
describe the muscle action to the patient.
easiest in this position. This is probably due to the
Anatomical illustrations of the muscles
facilitatory stretch of the deep abdominal muscles
involved are an effective teaching aid.
resulting from the forward drift of the abdominal
• Using instructions that cue the correct action.
contents. The patient is taught to locate and main-
MUSCLE CONTROL-PAIN CONTROL. WHAT EXERCISES WOULD YOU PRESCRIBE? 55
Figure 4.1 Re-education in four point kneeling. (A) The relaxed abdominal wall; (B) the abdominal drawing-in action.
Figure 4.3 The test of the abdominal drawing-in action in prone lying. The co
contraction is monitored with the pressure biofeedback unit.
Figure 4.4 The anterior view of the co-contraction. (A) The relaxed abdominal wall; (B) the abdominal drawing
in action.
Figure 4.5 The lateral view of the co-contraction. (A) The relaxed abdominal wall; (8) the drawing-in action.
REFERENCES
Andersson GBJ, Winters JM 1990 Role of muscle in to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back
postural tasks: spinal loading and postural stability. In: pain. Spine 19(2): 165-172
Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple Muscle Systems. Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA 1995 The effect of
Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 375-395 specific postural holding exercises on lumbar multifidus
Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, Letson D, Chuinard R, muscle recovery in acute low back pain patients.
D'Ambrosia R 1988 Muscular activation. The role of the Proceedings of the World Confederation of Physical
antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Therapists Congress, Washington
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 16(2): Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1995b Neuromotor
113-122 Dysfunction of the Trunk Musculature in Low Back Pain
Baugher WM, Warren RS, Marshall JL, Joseph A 1984 Patients. Proceedings of the World Confederation of
Quadriceps atrophy in anterior cruciate deficient knee. Physical Therapists Congress, Washington
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 12: 192-195 Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1997 Feedforward contraction
Bergmark A 1989 Stability of the Lumbar Spine. A study in of transversus abdominis is not influenced by the
mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopaedica direction of arm movement. Experimental Brain
Scandinavica Supplementum 230(60): 20-24 Research 114: 362-370
Biederman HJ, Shanks GL, Forrest WJ, Inglis J 1991 Hoffer J, Andreassen S 1981 Regulation of soleus muscle
Power spectrum analyses of electromyographic activity: stiffness in premamillary cats. Journal of
discriminators in the differential assessment of patients Neurophysiology 45: 267-285
with chronic low-back pain. Spine 16(10): 1179-1184 Johansson H, Sojka P 1991 Pathophysiological
Carter RR, Crago PE, Gorman PH 1993 Non linear stretch mechanisms involved in genesis and spread of
reflex interaction during a contraction. Journal of muscular tension in occupational muscle pain and in
Neurophysiology 69(3): 943-952 chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes: a hypothesis.
Cresswell AG, Grundstrom A, Thorstensson A 1992 Medical Hypotheses 35: 196-203
Observations on intra-abdominal pressure and patterns Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P 1991 Receptors in the
of abdominal intramuscular activity in man. Acta knee joint ligaments and their role in the biomechanics
Physiologica Scandinavica 144: 409-418 of the joint. CRC Critical Reviews in Biomedical
Crisco JJ III, Panjabi MM 1990 Postural biomechanical Engineering 18: 341-368
stability and gross muscular architecture in the spine. Jull GA, Richardson CA 1994 Rehabilitation of active
In: Winters JM, Woo SL-Y (eds) Multiple Muscle stabilization of the lumbar spine. In: Twomey LT, Taylor
Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 438-450 JR (eds) Physical Therapy of the Lumbar Spine, 2nd
Goel VK, Kong W, Han JS, Weinstein IN, Gilbertson LG edn. Churchill Livingstone, pp. 251-283
1993 A combined finite element and optimisation Jull G, Richardson C, Toppenberg R, Comerford M, Bui B
investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and 1993 Towards a measurement of active muscle control
without muscles. Spine 18(11): 1531-1541 for lumbar stabilization. Australian Journal of
Gollhofer A, Kryolainen H 1991 Neuromuscular control of Physiotherapy 39(3): 187-193
the human leg extensor muscles in jump exercises Kaigle AM, Holm SH, Hansson TH 1995 Experimental
under various stretch load conditions. International instability in the lumbar spine. Spine 20(24): 421-430
Journal of Sports Medicine 12:34-40 Lacote M, Clevalier AM, Miranda A, Bleton JP, Stevenin P
Hides JA, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Jull GA, Cooper DH 1994 1987 Clinical Evaluation of Muscle Function. Churchill
Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 290-293
60 LUMBAR SPINE
McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL 1991 Exercise Physiology, Richardson C, Toppenberg R, Jull G 1990 An initial
Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance, 3rd edn. Lea evaluation of eight abdominal exercises for their ability
and F ebiger, Philadelphia, pp 384-417 to provide stabilization for the lumbar spine. Australian
McGill SM 1991 Kinetic potential of the lumbar trunk Journal of Physiotherapy 36(1): 6-11
musculature about three orthogonal orthopaedic axes in Richardson CA, Jull GA, Toppenberg R, Comerford M 1992
extreme postures. Spine 16(7): 809-815 Techniques for active lumbar stabilization for spinal
O'Sullivan PB, Twomey LT 1994 Evaluation of specific protection: a pilot study. Australian Journal of
stabilising exercise in the treatment of chronic low back Physiotherapy 38(2): 105-112
pain with radiological diagnosis of spondylolysis or Richardson CA, Jull GA, Richardson BA 1995 A Dysfunction
spondylolisthesis. Thesis, Curtin University of of the Deep Abdominal Muscles Exists in Low Back Pain
Technology, Western Australia Patients. Proceedings of the World Confederation for
Panjabi M 1992 The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II Physical Therapy Congress, Washington
neutral zone and instability hypothesis. Journal of Spinal Robison R 1992 The new back school prescription: stab
Disorders 5: 390-397 ilization training part 1. Occupational Medicine 7: 17-31
Panjabi M, Abumi K, Duranceau J, Oxland T 1989 Spinal Saal JA, Saal JS 1989 Non operative treatment of herniated
stability and intersegmental muscle forces: a lumbar disc with radiculopathy: An outcome study.
biomechanical model. Spine 14(2): 194-200 Spine 14(4): 431-437
Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto Steffen R, Nolte LP, Pingel TH 1994 Rehabilitation of the
M, Einola S, Kalimo H 1993 The lumbar multifidus postoperative segmental lumbar instability - a
muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar disc biomechanical analysis of the rank of the back muscles.
herniation. Spine 18(5): 568-574 Rehabilitation 33: 164-170
Richardson CA, Jull GA 1994 Concepts of Rehabilitation for Wilke HJ, Wolf S, Claes LE, Arand M, Wiesend A 1995
spinal stability. In: Boyling JD, Palastanga N (eds) Grieve's Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different
Modern Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column 2nd muscle groups: a biomechanical in vitro study. Spine
edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 705-720 20(2): 192-198
MUSCLE CONTROL-PAIN CONTROL. WHAT EXERCISES WOULD YOU PRESCRIBE? 61
with biomedical engineers at the University of to new screening tests for the diagnosis of impair
Queensland. These measures are being tested in ments in the joint protection mechanisms, and
space-related 'bed rest' research in collaboration allow exercise prescription to be more efficient for
with the European Space Agency. It is anticipated future 'muscle control-pain control' management
that the results of these research studies will lead of low back pain.
REF E RENCES
Richardson C 2002 The health of the human skeletal the knee. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation
system for weight-bearing against gravity: The role of Medicine 18: 51-58
deloading the musculo-skeletal system in the Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, Damen L, Pas M.
development of musculo-skeletal injury. Gravitational Storm J 2002 The relation between the transversus
Physiology 9(1): 7-10. abdominis muscle, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low
Richardson CA, Bullock MI 1986 Changes in muscle activity back pain. Spine 27 (4): 399-405
during fast, alternating flexion-extension movements of
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 63
INTRODUCTION
with a chronic back pain condition, which pain patients without spondylolysis, based on
accounts for up to 75-90% of the cost (Indahl et al the finding of increased intersegmental motion
1995). In spite of the large number of pathological at the level above the pars defects (Phillips 1994;
conditions that can give rise to back pain, 85% of Avery 1996).
this population are classified as having 'non spe Because of these limitations the effective man
cific low back pain' (Dillingham 1995). More agement of lumbar segmental instability first
recently there has been increased focus on the relies on accurate clinical diagnosis. This article
identification of different subgroups within this outlines the common clinical presentations of
population (Coste et a11992; Bogduk 1995). lumbar segmental instability and the specific
Lumbar segmental instability is considered to exercise management of these conditions based
represent one of these subgroups (Friberg 1987). on a motor learning model.
Traditionally, the radiological diagnosis of
spondylolisthesis, in subjects with chronic low
back pain attributable to this finding, has been DEFINITION OF LUMBAR
considered to be one of the most obvious mani SEGMENTAL INSTABILITY
festations of lumbar instability (Nachemson 1991;
Pope et al 1992), with reports of increased seg Panjabi (1992) redefined spinal instability in
mental motion occurring with this condition and terms of a region of laxity around the neutral
spondylolysis (Friberg 1989; Mimura 1990; position of a spinal segment called the 'neutral
Montgomery & Fischgrund 1994; Wood et al zone'. This neutral zone is shown to be increased
1994). Lumbar segmental instability, in the with intersegmental injury and intervertebral
absence of defects of the bony architecture of the disc degeneration (Panjabi et a11989; Mimura et
lumbar spine, has also been cited as a significant a11994; Kaigle et aI1995), and decreased with
cause of chronic low back pain (Long et aI1996). simulated muscle forces across a motion seg
A number of studies have reported increased and ment (Panjabi et a11989; Kaigle et a11995; Wilke
abnormal intersegmental motion in subjects with et al 1995). The size of the neutral zone is con
chronic low back pain, often in the absence of sidered to be an important measure of spinal sta
other radiological findings (Sihvonen & Partanen bility. It is influenced by the interaction between
1990; Gertzbein 1991; Lindgren et aI1993). what Panjabi (1992) described as the passive,
The limitation in the clinical diagnosis of lum active and neural control systems:
bar segmental instability lies in the difficulty to
• The passive system constituting the verte
det�ct accurately abnormal or excessive inter
brae, intervertebral discs, zygapophyseal
segmental motion, as conventional radiological
joints and ligaments
testing is often insensitive and unreliable
• The active system constituting the muscles
(Dvorak et al 1991; Pope et al 1992). Because of
and tendons surrounding and acting on the
this, the finding of increased and abnormal inter
spinal column
segmental motion of a single motion segment on
• The neural system comprising the nerves and
radiological examination is considered to be sig
central nervous system which direct and con
nificant only if it confirms the clinical finding of
trol the active system in providing dynamic
lumbar segmental instability at the correspon
stability.
ding symptomatic level (Kirkaldy-Willis &
Farfan 1982). Although the sensitivity, specificity In light of this, Panjabi (1992) defined spinal insta
and predictive value of physical examination bility as a significant decrease in the capacity of
findings are largely unproven (Nachemson 1991), the stabilizing systems of the spine to maintain
recent research indicates that skilled manipula intervertebral neutral zones within physiological
tive physiotherapists can distinguish subjects limits so there is no major deformity, neurological
with symptomatic spondylolysis from low back deficit or incapacitating pain.
LUMBAR SEGMENTAL 'INSTABILITY': CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND STABILIZING EXERCISE MANAGEMENT 65
Hodges & Richardson 1996) and lumbar instabil of the hands to assist this motion. Segmental shifts
ity (Sihvonen et al 1991; Lindgren et al 1993; or hinging were commonly observed to be asso
O'Sullivan et al 1997d). There have also been ciated with the painful movement. Abolition or
reports that compensatory substitution of global significant reduction of pain with deep abdomi
system muscles occurs in the presence of local nal muscle activation during the provocative
muscle system dysfunction. This appears to be the movement was often noted. Neurological exami
neural control system's attempt to maintain the nation and neural tissue provocation tests were
stability demands of the spine in the presence of generally normal (O'Sullivan 1997). These find
local muscle dysfunction (Richardson & Jull 1995; ings are consistent with those reported by other
Edgerton et al 1996; O'Sullivan et al 1997d). There researchers (Kirkaldy-Willis & Farfan 1982; Paris
is also evidence to suggest that the presence of 1985) and with a movement control problem with
chronic low back pain often results in a general in the neutral zone.
loss of function and de-conditioning as well as
changes to the neural control system, affecting
DIRECTIONAL PATTERNS OF
timing of patterns of co-contraction, balance,
LUMBAR SEGMENTAL 'INSTABILITY'
reflex and righting responses (O'Sullivan et al
1997b). Such disruptions to the neuromuscular The directional nature of instability based upon
system leave the lumbar spine potentially vulner the mechanism of injury, resultant site of tissue
able to instability, particularly within the neutral damage and clinical presentation is welltmder
zone (Cholewicke & McGill 1996). stood in the knee and shoulder, but poorly under
stood in the lumbar spine. Dupuis et al (1985)
reported, on the basis of experimental and radio
CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF LUMBAR logical data, that the location of the dominant
SEGMENTAL INSTABILITY lesion in the motion segment determines the pat
tern of instability manifested. As the motion with
Questionnaire data completed by subjects diag in the lumbar spine is three-dimensional and
nosed with lumbar segmental instability involved involves coupled movements, tissue damage is
in recent clinical trials revealed that half of the likely to result in movement dysfunction in more
subjects developed their back pain condition sec than one direction of movement.
ondary to a single event injury while the other half The following clinical classifications have
developed their back pain gradually in relation to developed from clinical observation and have not
multiple minor traumatic incidents (O'Sullivan been scientifically validated. They are based on
1997). The subjects' main complaint was of chron the mechanism of injury to the spine, resultant tis
ic and recurrent low back pain and associated sue damage, the reported and observed aggra
high levels of functional disability. Subjects com vating activities and movement problems relating
monly reported a poor outcome from general to a specific movement quadrant or quadrants.
exercise and resistance training programmes as They provide a basis by which patients can be
well as aggravation from spinal manipulation and assessed and movement dysfunction analysed in
mobilization. The back pain was most commonly a segmental and individual specific manner.
described as recurrent (70%), constant (55%), Common to all the patient presentations is the
'catching' (45%), 'locking' (20%), 'giving way' reported vulnerability and observed lack of move
(20%) or accompanied by a feeling of 'instability' ment control and related symptoms within the
(35%) (O'Sullivan 1997). On physical examination, neutral zone. This is associated with the inability
active spinal movement revealed good ranges of to initiate co-contraction of the local muscle sys
spinal mobility, with the presence of 'through tem within this zone. It appears that these patients
range' pain or a painful arc rather than end-of develop compensatory movement strategies
range limitation, and the inability to return to erect which 'stabilize' the motion segment out of the
standing from forward bending without the use neutral zone and towards an end-range position
LUMBAR SEGMENTAL 'INSTABILITY': CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND STABILIZING EXERCISE MANAGEMENT 67
Flexion
Left Right
sidebending sidebending
Extension
D D
'unstable' 'stable'
movement zone movement zone
'Flexion' pattern
Figure 5.2 Flexion pattern: patient who sustained a
The 'flexion' pattern appears to be most common.
flexion injury displays signs and symptoms of segmental
These patients primarily complain of central back instability at L5/S1 during flexion/rotation movements.
pain and relate their injury to either a single flex Note, in sitting, the segmental loss of lower lumbar
lordosis with upper lumbar and lower thoracic spine
ion/rotation injury or to repetitive strains relating
compensatory lordosis. (Reproduced by kind permission
to flexion/rotational activities. They predomi of W.B. Saunders.)
nantly report the aggravation of their symptoms
and 'vulnerability' during flexion/rotational
movements, with an inability to sustain semi flexion to neutral without use of the hands to
flexed postures (Fig. 5.1). These patients present assist the movement. During backward bending,
with a loss of segmental lumbar lordosis at the extension above the symptomatic segment with
level of the 'unstable motion segment'. This is an associated loss of extension at the affected seg
often noticeable in standing and is accentuated in ment is often observed. Specific movement test
sitting postures with a tendency for them to hold ing reveals an inability to differentiate anterior
their pelvis in a degree of posterior pelvic tilt. This pelvic tilt and low lumbar spine extension inde
loss of segmental lordosis is increased in flexed pendent of upper lumbar and thoracic spine
postures and is usually associated with increased extension. Movement tests such as squatting, sit
tone in the upper lumbar and lower thoracic erec ting with knee extension or hip flexion, 'sit to
tor spinae muscles with an associated increase in stand' and forward loaded postures reveal an
lordosis in this region (Fig. 5.2). Movements into inability to control a neutral segmental lordosis,
forward bending are associated with the initiation with a tendency to segmentally flex at the unsta
of movement, and a tendency to flex more at the ble motion segment, posteriorly tilt the pelvis and
symptomatic level than at the adjacent levels. This extend the upper lumbar and thoracic spine.
movement is usually associated with an arc of Specific muscle tests reveal an inability to acti
pain into flexion and an inability to return from vate lumbar multifidus in co-contraction with the
68 LUMBAR SPINE
Flexion
Left Right
sidebending sidebending
Extension
D D
'unstable' 'stable'
movement zone movement zone
Figure 5.3 Flexion pattern: the same patient as in figure Figure 5.4 Unstable movement zone - extension
5.2 in the neutral resting position in four point kneeling. pattern. (Reproduced by kind permission of w.B.
Note the posterior tilt of the pelvis and loss of lower Saunders.)
lumbar segmental lordosis with upper lumbar
compensatory lordosis. (Reproduced by kind permission
of W.B. Saunders.)
Extension pattern
Figure 5.10 Lateral shifting pattern: patient with lumbar segmental instability at L4/5 complaining of an unstable move
ment zone in flexion to the left. (A) Patient presents in standing with a loss of segmental lordosis at L4/5 associated with
a left-lateral segmental shift. (B) The left-lateral shift is accentuated when single leg-standing on the left with a tendency
to transfer weight through the trunk rather than through the pelvis. (Reproduced by kind permission of W.B. Saunders.)
3. Maintaining neutral lordosis, facilitate the in a quiet environment. Once this pattern of mus
'drawing up and in' contraction of the pelvic cle activation has been isolated then the contrac
floor and lower and middle fibres of tions must be performed with postural correction
transversus abdominis with gentle in sitting and standing and the holding contrac
controlled lateral costal diaphragm breathing tion increased from 10 to 60 seconds prior to its
and without global muscle substitution. This integration into functional tasks and aerobic activ
is facilitated in non-weight-bearing postures ities such as talking. At this stage a degree of pain
such as four point kneeling, prone or supine control is expected in these postures. This pro
only if accurate co-contraction cannot be vides a powerful biofeedback for the patient. This
facilitated in weight-bearing postures such stage may take 3-6 weeks to achieve.
as sitting and standing.
4. Facilitate bilateral activation of segmental
SECOND STAGE OF TRAINING
lumbar multifidus (at the unstable level) in
co-contraction with transversus abdominis The second phase of motor learning is the asso
and controlled lateral costal diaphragm ciative stage, where the focus is on refining a par
breathing while maintaining a neutral ticular movement pattern. The aim is to identify
lordosis. two or three faulty and pain-provocative move
5. Train co-contraction in sitting and standing ment patterns based on the examination and
with postural correction. break them down into component movements
with high repetitions (i.e. 50-60). The patient is
taken through these steps whilst isolating the co
Strategies to inhibit global muscle
contraction of the local muscle system. This is first
substitution
carried out while maintaining the spine in a neu
1. Obliquus externus abdominis and rectus tral lordotic posture and finally with normal
abdominis: spinal movement. At all times segmental control
- focus on pelvic floor contraction and pain control must be ensured. This can be per
- facilitate upper lumbar lordosis and formed for sit to stand, walking, lifting, bending,
lateral costal diaphragm breathing to twisting, extending etc. The patients carry out the
open sternal angle movement components on a daily basis with pain
- focus on optimal postural alignment in control and gradually increase the speed and com
weight bearing. plexity of the movement pattern until they can
2. Thoracolumbar erector spinae: move in a smooth, free and controlled manner.
- avoid thoracic spine extension and Patients are encouraged to carry out regular aer
excessive lumbar spine lordosis obic exercise, such as walking, while maintaining
- ensure independence of pelvis and low correct postural alignment, low level local muscle
lumbar spine movement from thoracic system co-contraction and controlled respiration.
spine and hips This helps to increase the tone within the muscles
- facilitate lateral costal diaphragm and aids the automaticity of the pattern.
breathing Patients are encouraged to perform the co-con
- use of palpatory and electromyograph tractions in situations where they experience or
biofeedback, and muscle release anticipate pain or feel 'unstable'. This is essential,
techniques. so that the patterns of co-contraction eventually
occur automatically. This stage can last from
In the early stages the instruction is to cease the between 8 weeks to 4 months depending on the
contraction if global muscle substitution occurs; performer, the degree and nature of the pathology
breathing control is lost, muscle fatigue occurs or and the intensity of practice, before the motor pat
there is an increase in resting pain. Training is per tern is learned and becomes automatic. It is at this
formed a minimum of once a day (10- 15 minutes) stage that patients commonly report the ability to
74 LUMBAR SPINE
carry out previously aggravating activities with functional demands of daily living. Evidence that
out pain and are able to cease the formal specific changes to automatic patterns of muscle recruit
exercise programme. They are instructed to main ment can be achieved by this intervention is sup
tain local muscle system control functionally with ported by surface electromyography data and the
postural awareness, while maintaining regular long-term positive outcome for subjects who had
levels of general exercise. undergone this treatment intervention (O'Sullivan
et a11997c; 1998a; 1998b) (Fig. 5.13).
THIRD STAGE OF TRAINING
Figure 5.1 3 (A) Patient with a chronic low back pain condition associated with a multi-directional instability pattern
associated with a spondylolisthesis at L5/S1 , prior to specific exercise intervention. Note the sway posture and poor
tone of the lower abdominal wall. (B) The same patient following a 1 0-week specific exercise intervention programme
focused on training the co-contraction of the deep abdominal muscles with segmental lumbar multifidus and
integrating this muscle control into functional tasks based on a motor learning model. Note the tone in the lower
abdominal wall and correction of the sway posture compared to the pre-intervention photo. (Reproduced by kind
permission of W.B. Saunders.)
LUMBAR SEGMENTAL 'INSTABILITY': CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND STABILIZING EXERCISE MANAGEMENT 75
to enhance optimal segmental spinal control for ance. Evidence for the efficacy of this approach is
patients with lumbar segmental instability is a log growing although clinical trials comparing this to
ical management strategy for this condition. The other exercise approaches is required.
success of this approach depends on the skill and
ability of the physiotherapist to accurately identi
Acknowledgements
fy the clinical problem and the specific motor con
trol dysfunction present and facilitate the All figures are reproduced by kind permission of
correction of the faulty movement strategies. It W.B. Saunders from Twomey and Taylor (eds)
will also be greatly influenced by the severity of 2000 Physical Therapy of the Low Back, 3rd edn.
the patients condition and their level of compli- W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
REFERENCES
Allison G, Kendle K, Roll S, Schupelius J, Scott Q, Panizza Friberg 0 1989 Functional radiography of the lumbar spine.
J 1997 The role of the diaphragm during abdominal Annals of Medicine 21(5): 341-346
hollowing exercises. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy Gertzbein S 1991 Segmental instability of the lumbar spine.
44(2): 95-102 Seminars in Spinal Surgery 3(2): 130-135
Aspden R 1992 Review of the functional anatomy of the Goel V, Kong W, Han J, Weinstein J, Gilbertson L 1993 A
spinal ligaments and the lumbar erector spinae combined finite element and optimization investigation
muscles. Clinical Anatomy 5: 372-387 of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
Avery A 1996 The reliability of manual physiotherapy Spine 18(11): 1531-1541
palpation techniques in the diagnosis of bilateral pars Hides J, Richardson C, Jull G 1996 Multifidus recovery is
defects in subjects with chronic low back pain. Master not automatic following resolution of acute first episode
of Science Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, of low back pain. Spine 21(23): 2763-2769
Western Australia Hodges P, Richardson C 1996 Inefficient muscular
Bergmark A 1989 Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low
mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopaedica back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus
Scandinavica 230(60)(Suppl). 20-24 abdominis. Spine 21(22): 2640-2650
Biedermann HJ, Shanks GL, Forrest WJ, Inglis J 1991 Hodges P, Butler J, McKenzie D, Gandevia S 1997
Power spectrum analysis of electromyographic activity. Contraction of the human diaphragm during rapid
Spine 16(10): 1179-1184 postural adjustments. Journal of Physiology 505(2):
Bogduk N 1995 The anatomical basis for spinal pain 539-548
syndromes. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas 0 1995 Good prognosis for
Therapeutics 18(9): 603-605 low back pain when left untampered. Spine 20(4):
Cholewicke J, McGill S 1996 Mechanical stability of the in 473-477
vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic Kaigle A, Holm S, Hansson T 1995 Experimental instability
low back pain. Clinical Biomechanics 11 (1): 1-15 in the lumbar spine. Spine 20(4): 421-430
Coste J, Paolaggi J, Spira A 1992 Classification of non Kirkaldy-Willis W, Farfan H 1982 Instability of the lumbar
specific low back pain II. Clinical diversity of organic spine. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 165:
forms. Spine 17(9): 1038-1042 110-123
Cresswell A 1993 Responses of intra-abdominal pressure Lindgren K, Sihvonen T, Leino E, Pitkanen M 1993 Exercise
and abdominal muscle activity during dynamic loading in therapy effects on functional radiographic findings and
man. European Journal of Applied Physiology 66: segmental electromyographic activity in lumbar spine
315-320 instability. Archives in Physical Medicine and
Dillingham T 1995 Evaluation and management of low back Rehabilitation 74: 933-939
pain: and overview. State of the Art Reviews 9(3): Long D, BenDebba M, Torgenson W 1996 Persistent back
559-574 pain and sciatica in the United States: patient
Dupuis P, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy D, Kirkaldy-Willis W 1985 characteristics. Journal of Spinal Disorders 9(1): 40-58
Radiological diagnosis of degenerative spinal instability. McGill S 1991 Electromyographic activity of the abdominal
Spine 10(3): 262-276 and low back musculature during the generation of
Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Novotny J, Chang D, Grob D 1991 isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque; Implications
Clinical validation of functional flexion-extension for lumbar mechanics. Journal of Orthopaedic Research
roentgenograms of the lumbar spine. Spine 16(8): 9: 91-103
943-950 McGill S, Norman R 1987 Reassessment of the role of
Edgerton V, Wolf S, Levendowski D, Roy R 1996 intra-abdominal pressure in spinal compression.
Theoretical basis for patterning EMG amplitudes to Ergonomics 30(11): 1565-1688
assess muscle dysfunction. Medicine and Science in Mimura M 1990 Rotational instability of the lumbar spine -
Sports and Exercise 28(6): 744-751 a three dimensional motion study using bi-plane X-ray
Friberg 0 1987 Lumbar instability: a dynamic approach by analysis system. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi
traction-compression radiography. Spine 12(2): 119-129 64(7): 546-559
76 LUMBAR SPINE
Mimura M, Panjabi M, Oxland T, Crisco J, Yamamoto I, Paris S 1985 Physical signs of instability. Spine 10(3):
Vasavada A 1994 Disc degeneration affects the 277-279
multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine Phillips D 1994 A comparison of manual diagnosis with a
19(12): 1371-1380 diagnosis established by a uni-Ievel spinal block
Montgomery D, Fischgrund J 1994 Passive reduction of procedure. Master of Science Thesis, Curtin University
spondylolisthesis on the operating room table: a of Technology, Western Australia
prospective study. Journal of Spinal Disorders 7(2): Pope M, Frymoyer J, Krag M 1992 Diagnosing instability.
167-172 Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 296:
Nachemson A 1991 Instability of the lumbar spine. 60-67
Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 2(4): 785-790 Richardson C, JulI G 1995 Muscle control - pain control.
O' Sullivan P 1997 The efficacy of specific stabilizing exercise What exercises would you prescribe? Manual Therapy
in the management of chronic low back pain with 1(1): 2-10
radiological diagnosis of lumbar segmental instability. PhD Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J 1999 Therapeutic
Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia exercise for the spinal segmental stabilization in low
O'SUllivan P, Twomey L, Allison G 1997a Dynamic back pain: scientific basis and clinical approach.
stabilization of the lumbar spine. Critical Reviews of Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 9(3&4): 315-330 Roy S, Deluca C, Casavant D 1989 Lumbar muscle fatigue
O'Sullivan P, Twomey L, Allison G 1997b Dysfunction of the and chronic low back pain. Spine 14: 992-1 001
neuro-muscular system in the presence of low back pain Sahrmann S 1993 Diagnosis and treatment of muscle
- implications for physical therapy management. imbalances associated with regional pain syndromes.
Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 5( 1 ): 20-26 Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia
O'SUllivan P, Twomey L, Allison G 1997c Evaluation of - Eighth Biennial Conference - post conference
specific stabilising exercise in the treatment of chronic workshop. Perth, Western Australia: 1-27
low back pain with radiological diagnosis of Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M 1995 Motor control -
spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Spine 15(24): Theory and Practical Applications. Williams & Wilkins,
2959-2967 Baltimore
O' Sullivan P, Twomey L, Allison G, Sinclair J, Miller K, Knox Sihvonen T, Partanen J 1 990 Segmental hypermobility in
J 1997d Altered patterns of abdominal muscle activation lumbar spine and entrapment of dorsal rami.
in patients with chronic back pain. Australian Journal of Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology 30:
Physiotherapy 43(2): 91-98 175-180
O'SUllivan P, Twomey L, Allison G 1998a Altered abdominal Sihvonen T, Partanen J, Hanninen 0, Soimakallio S 1991
muscle recruitment in back pain patients following Electric behaviour of low back muscles during lumbar
specific exercise intervention. Journal of Orthopaedic pelvic rhythm in low back pain patients and healthy
and Sports Physical Therapy 27(2): 1-11 controls. Archives of Physical Medicine and
O' SUllivan P, Twomey L, Allison G, Taylor J 1 998b Specific Rehabilitation 72: 1080-1087
stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back Steffen R, Nolte L, Pingel T 1994 Importance of the back
pain with clinical and radiological diagnosis of lumbar muscles in rehabilitation of postoperative segmental
segmental 'instability' . Third Interdisciplinary World lumbar instability - a biomechanical analysis.
Congress on Low Back and Pelvic Pain, V ienna, Austria: Rehabilitation (Stuttgart) 33(3): 164-170
366-367 Wilke H, Wolf S, Claes L, Arand M, W iesend A 1995
Panjabi M 1992 The stabilizing system of the spine. Part 1 Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different
and Part 2. Journal of Spinal Disorders 5(4): 383-397 muscle groups. Spine 20(2): 1 92-198
Panjabi M, Abumi K, Duranceau J, Oxland T 1989 Spinal Wood K, Popp C, Transfeldt E, Geissele A 1994
stability and intersegmental muscle forces. A Radiographic evaluation of instability in
biomechanical model. Spine 14(2): 194-199 spondylolisthesis. Spine 19(15): 1697-1703
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 77
Postscript 91
T. M. Hall R. L. Elvey
School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of
Technology, Perth, Australia
INTRODUCTION
upper Hmb tension test (Butler 1991) coupled with ponent; and the presence of allodynia (Fields 1987;
adverse mechanical tension of the nervous system Devor 1 991).
(Butler 1989), led many physiotherapists to a pre In contrast, nerve trunk pain has been attributed
occupation with faulty neural tissue mechanics. to increased activity in mechanically or chemical
In more recent years there has been an increase ly sensitized nociceptors within the nerve sheaths
in the understanding of pain physiology and there ( Asbury & Fields 1984). This kind of pain is said to
has been much interest into the area of neural tis follow the course of the nerve trunk. It is com
sue involvement in pain disorders ( Greening & monly described as deep and aching, similar to a
Lynn 1 998; Zusman 1998), particularly from a 'toothache' and made worse with movement,
physiotherapy perspective. This knowledge nerve stretch or palpation (Asbury & Fields 1 984).
requires careful consideration in the management Peripheral nerve trunks are known to be
of neural tissue disorders and has necessitated a mechanosensitive, for they possess afferents with
change in the understanding of the physical treat in their connective tissues that are normally capa
ment of pain (Butler 1 998), particularly in regard ble of mechanoreception ( Hromada 1963; Thomas
to neuropathic pain (Elvey 1998). et aI1993). These afferents are known as the nervi
The purpose of this article is to present a nervorum; the majority are unmyelinated forming
scheme for the clinical examination to evaluate the a sporadic plexus in all the connective tissues of a
involvement of neural tissue in a disorder of pain peripheral nerve and have predominantly 'free'
and dysfunction, together with a treatment endings ( Hromada 1 963). Electrophysiological
approach where there is a reversible muscu studies by Bove and Light (1995) demonstrated
loskeletal cause of the neuropathic pain disorder. that at least some of the nervi nervorum have a
nociceptive function because they respond to nox
ious mechanical, chemical and thermal stimuli.
PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHIC PAIN Most nervi nervorum studied by Bove and Light
(1997) were sensitive to excess longitudinal stretch
The term 'peripheral neuropathic pain' has been of the entire nerve they innervated, as well as to
suggested to embrace the combination of positive local stretch in any direction and to focal pressure.
and negative symptoms in patients in whom pain They did not respond to stretch within normal
is due to pathological changes or dysfunction in ranges of motion. This evidence is supported by
peripheral nerves or nerve roots (Devor & clinical studies that show under normal circum
Rappaport 1990). Positive symptoms include pain, stances nerve trunks are insensitive to non-noxious
paraesthesia and spasm. In contrast, anaesthesia mechanical deformation (Kuslich et a11991; Hall
and weakness are negative sensory and motor & Quintner 1 996).
symptoms, respectively. Recent evidence has shown that the nervi ner
Two types of neuropathic pain following vorum contain neuropeptides including sub
peripheral nerve injury have been recognized: stance P and calcitonin gene related peptide,
'dysaesthetic pain' and 'nerve trunk pain' (Asbury indicating a role in neurogenic vasodilation
& Fields 1 984). Dysaesthetic pain results from vol (Zochodne 1993; Bove & Light 1997). Bove and
leys of impulses arising in damaged or regenerat Light (1997) suggested that local nerve inflam
ing nociceptive, afferent fibres. Characteristically mation is mediated by the nervi nervorum, espe
dysaesthetic pain is felt in the peripheral sensory cially in cases with no intrafascicular axonal
distribution of a sensory or mixed nerve. This pain damage. In keeping with this, it has been postu
has features that are not found in deep pain aris lated that the spread of mechanosensitivity along
ing from either somatic or visceral tissues. These the length of the nerve trunk, distant to the local
include abnormal or unfamiliar sensations, fre area of pathology seen in nerve trunk pain, is
quently having a burning or electrical quality; media ted through neurogenic inflamma tion via
pain felt in the region of the sensory deficit; pain the nervi nervorum (Quintner 1998). The entire
with a paroxysmal brief shooting or stabbing com- nerve trunk then behaves as a sensitized noci-
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 79
tion, calf muscle stretch and palpation of the mus 5. Mechanical aUodynia in response to
cle. No one test in isolation is sufficient and the palpation of specific nerve trunks, which
physical examination findings should be consis relate specifically and anatomically to 2 and 4
tent with the degree of trauma and subjective pain 6. Evidence from the physical examination of a
complaint ascertained from the subjective history. local cause of the neurogenic pain, which
In pain disorders multiple tissues are frequent would involve the neural tissue showing
ly involved and a very careful physical examina the responses in 4 and 5.
tion is required to ascertain from which tissue pain
predominates. To determine whether neural tis Under normal circumstances peripheral nerve
sue is involved a clinical reasoning process must trunks slide and glide with movement adapting to
be employed similar to, but more sophisticated positional changes of the trunk and limbs (Mclellan
than, the example given for calf pain and a num & Swash 1 976; Breig 1 978). When neural tissue is
ber of very specific correlating signs must be pres sensitized limb movement and positional change
ent. For instance, it is not possible to say that a cause a provocative mechanical stimulus resulting
straight leg raise (SLR) test as a single test is pos in pain and therefore noncompliance. This lack of
itive or negative in the diagnosis of nerve root compliance will be demonstrated by painful limi
pathology. The mechanical stress of SLR is not iso tation of movement caused by muscles antagonis
lated to the neural structures ( [(leynhans & Terrett tic to the direction of movement acting to prevent
1 986). SLR induces posterior pelvic rotation with further pain. Muscle contraction, as measured by
in a few degrees of lifting the leg from the hori electromyography, in response to painful mechani
zontal ( Fahlgren Grampo et aI1 991). Structures in cal provocation of upper and lower quarter periph
the posterior thigh, pelvis and lumbar spine, eral nerve trunks, has been demonstrated in normal
including hamstring muscles, lumbar facet joints, subjects as well as subjects who have a neuropath
lumbar intervertebral ligaments, muscles and the ic pain disorder ( Hall et a11 995; Hall & Quintner
intervertebral discs as well as neural tissues, must 1996; Balster & Ju1l 1 997). In those subjects with a
be mechanically provoked. The findings from the neuropathic pain disorder, due to heightened neu
SLR test must be interpreted within the clinical ral tissue mechanosensitivity, muscle activity occurs
context of a number of other procedures before a at the onset of pain provocation, whereas in normal
diagnosis of nerve root pathology can be made. subjects muscle activity occurs according to the level
The importance of accurate diagnosis or deter of the subject'S pain tolerance ( Hall et aI1995). It
mination of the tissue of the primary source of ori appears that muscles are recruited via central nerv
gin of pain lies in providing accurate treatment ous system processes to prevent pain associated
prescription. with the provocation of neural tissue ( Hall &
Quintner 1996).
PHYSICAL SIGNS OF NEURAL
TISSUE INVOLVEMENT POSTURE
According to Elvey and Hall (1997) the physical A particular antalgic postural position that would
signs of neuropathic pain should include the fol shorten the anatomical distance over which a
lowing: peripheral nerve trunk courses may be the first
clinical consideration of neuropathic pain. For
1. Antalgic posture
example, the patient who presents with severe leg
2. Active movement dysfunction
pain associated with sensitization of the S1 nerve
3. Passive movement dysfunction, which
root will frequently adopt an antalgic posture of
correlates with the active movement
knee flexion, ankle plantar flexion and lumbar
dysfunction
spine ipsilateral lateral flexion ( Fig. 6.1).
4. Adverse responses to neural tissue
A similar example in a patient with a brachial
provocation tests, which must relate
plexopathy would be a combination of shoulder
specifically and anatomically to 2 and 3
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 81
Figure 6.1 Typical antalgic posture of lumbar spine Figure 6.2 Lumbar spine left-lateral flexion.
right-lateral flexion associated with right leg pain.
girdle elevation, cervical spine ipsilateral lateral on which neural tissue is involved some move
flexion and elbow flexion. Guarded postures to ments will be more provocative than others.
avoid movement of the sensitized nerve site have Figures 6.2 and 6.3 demonstrate active move
been demonstrated in an animal model ( Laird & ment limitation of lumbar lateral flexion that is
Bennett 1 993). The most likely mechanism for consistent with the antalgic posture secondary to
altered posture is protective muscle contraction or sensitization of right lower quarter neural tissues.
spasm. The magnitude of an antalgic posture will In the lower quarter, lumbar flexion, with hip
vary with the severity of pain. flexion and knee extension, is provocative to the
sciatic nerve, its terminal branches and the L4-53
nerve roots. If pain is provoked or the range of
ACTIVE MOVEMENT
movement is limited, it is possible to consider a
An analysis of an antalgic posture will indicate process to differentiate between pathology in the
painful limitation of specific active movements lumbar somatic structures and neural tissues by
that will provide further evidence that neural tis positioning the ankle in dorsiflexion or the cervi
sue is involved in a painful disorder. Depending cal spine in flexion and repeating the movement.
82 LUMBAR SPINE
Figure 6.3 Lumbar spine right-lateral flexion. Figure 6.4 Lumbar spine left-lateral flexion with knee
flexion.
Should neural tissue be involved, the response to Figures 6.4- 6. 6 demonstrate an increasingly
active lumbar flexion would be more painful and limited range of lumbar spine left-lateral flexion
the range of movement further limited by pain. with neural sensitizing manoeuvres, utilizing the
Great care must be taken to prevent compensa sciatic and femoral nerve trunks.
tory involuntary movement of knee flexion, In the upper quarter various active movements
which is presumably a protective hamstring mus will be affected depending on the particular nerve
cle response. tract involved. Shoulder abduction and contralat
In contrast to the sciatic nerve the femoral eraI lateral flexion of the cervical spine will affect
nerve arises from the L2 to L4 nerve roots and will the brachial plexus and associated tracts of neural
be mechanically stimulated by a combination of, tissue (Elvey 19 79 ; Reid 1987), and, as such, are the
among other movements, lumbar contralateral lat most likely movements to be affected in the pres
eraI flexion, hip extension and knee flexion. Again ence of increased mechanosensitivity of the neu
differentiation of somatic and neural structure as ral tissues forming the brachial plexus.
the source of pain can be considered by using a If active shoulder abduction or cervical spine
combination of remote movements sensitizing the contralateral lateral flexion is painful or limited in
neural structures. range, the clinician can differentiate between local
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 83
Figure 6.5 Lumbar spine left-lateral flexion with Figure 6.6 Lumbar spine left-lateral flexion with hip
increased knee flexion. flexion and knee off full extension.
pathology and neural tissue by repeating the disorders there should be consistent limitation of
movement with neural sensitizing manoeuvres range of passive movement by pain in the same
such as wrist extension. Wrist extension will place direction as active movement limitation.
greater provocation on the upper quarter neural The flexion/ adduction manoeuvre of the hip
tissue (Kleinrensink et a1 1 995; Lewis et al 1 998) and the quadrant position of the shoulder
via the median and ulnar nerve trunks. With an ( Maitland 1991) are two important passive move
understanding of applied anatomy the clinician ment tests of those joints. Not only do these move
can examine active movements in various ways to ments stress the hip joint and shoulder complex
support the clinical hypotheses of a neuropathic but certain peripheral nerve trunks (Breig & Troup
pain disorder. 1 979; Elvey & Hall 1 997). For example, the sciatic
nerve lies posterior and lateral to the axis of
motion of hip flexion adduction, so this move
PASSIVE MOVEMENT DYSFUNCTION
ment will be provocative to the sciatic nerve and
It is obvious that both active and passive move hence the L4-53 nerve roots. A determination of
ment have the same mechanical stimulus effect possible neural tissue involvement where flexion
on neural tissues. Therefore in neuropathic pain adduction of the hip is painfully limited can be
84 LUMBAR SPINE
made by perfornting the same movement with the resistance to movement ( Hall et al 1998). This
knee more extended. A significant increase in increase in resistance should coincide with the
painful limitation of movement should be seen if patient's report of onset of pain ( Hall et a11 995)
neural tissue were involved in the condition. and reproduction of pain complaint. Symptom
reproduction is the second important response.
Figures 6.7 and 6.8 demonstrate provocative
ADVERSE RESPONSES TO NEURAL
manoeuvres to the femoral and sciatic nerve
TISSUE PROVOCATION TESTS
trunks as well as associated nerve roots for the
A variety of tests have been described that have patient previously illustrated.
been shown to mechanically stimulate various
components of the neural system, and hence can
MECHANICAL ALLODYNIA IN
be used provocatively. The most common of these
RESPONSE TO PALPATION OF
provocative manoeuvres is the SLR test ( Goddard
SPECIFIC NERVE TRUNKS
& Reid 1 965). Others described include the slump
test ( Louis 1 981), the femoral nerve stress test An example has been given of an acute muscle
(Sugiura et a11 979), the passive neck flexion test tear where pain on palpation is an important
(Yuan et al 1 998), the median nerve stress test aspect of diagnosis. Likewise, if the nervi nervo
(Kleinrensink et a11 995) and the 'brachial plexus rum is sensitized and pain is provoked by stress
tension test' (Elvey 1 985). applied through the length of the nerve then it
A methodological approach to neural tissue should also follow that focal pressure directly
provocation tests for the upper quarter has been over the nerve trunk would also be painful. It is
documented (Elvey & Hall 1 997). This approach well known that normal peripheral nerve trunks
offers guidelines for examination, thus allowing the and nerve roots are painless to non-noxious
test technique to be tailored to the severity of a neu mechanical pressure ( Howe et a11 977; Kuslich et
ropathic pain disorder. The suggested approach al 1 991; Hall & Quintner 1996). According to
incorporates provocative manoeuvres directed to Dyck (1987), the entire extent of the sciatic nerve
the median, radial and ulnar nerve trunks from a trunk is invariably tender when a lumbosacral
proximal to distal direction and vice versa. nerve root is traumatized. Similar findings have
A similar flexible approach is recommended for been reported in cervical radiculopathy ( Hall &
the lower quarter. For a disorder involving the Quintner 1996).
lumbar spine, provocative manoeuvres directed The spread of mechanosensitivity along the
to the sciatic, femoral and obturator nerve trunks length of the nerve trunk following proximal
are required. The addition of sensitizing manoeu nerve trauma has been reported elsewhere (Devor
vres may be necessary. With the SLR test these & Rappaport 1 990) and has been interpreted as
would include, among others, ankle dorsiflexion, reflecting mechanosensitivity of regenerating axon
medial hip rotation and hip adduction, which sprouts freely growing, or arrested in disseminat
have all been shown to increase the mechanical ed microneuromas. An alternative construct has
provocation on the sciatic nerve tract (O'Connell been put forward by Bove & Light (1997), who
1951; Breig & Troup 1979). For provocative tests to suggested that abnormal responses to mechanical
the femoral and obturator nerve lumbar spine provocation of neural tissue in radiculopathy arise
contralateral lateral flexion may be used as a sen from the nervi nervorum. The spread of sensiti
sitizing manoeuvre. Neural tissue provocation zation of the nervi nervorum has been attributed
tests are passive movement tests. The examiner to neurogenic inflammation (Quintner 1 998).
must appreciate changes in muscle tone or activ In the clinical setting, palpation of neural tissue
ity in addition to a subjective pain response. must be undertaken with great care. Mild pressure
Increased muscle activity is a reflection of should be applied to the nerve trunks on the unin
increased mechanosensitivity of the neural tissue volved side first in order to allow the patient to
being tested and is indicated by an increase in make a comparison. In some instances palpation
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 85
Figure 6.7 Hip extension with knee flexion, provocative Figure 6.8 Hip flexion with knee flexion, provocative to
to the femoral nerve and associated nerve roots. the sciatic nerve and associated nerve roots.
Figure 6.9 Palpation of the femoral nerve. Figure 6.1 0 P alpation of the common peroneal (fibular)
nerve.
dysfunction. Palpatory examination procedures We propose that the above scheme of examina
of the lumbar spine would reveal aberrant spinal tion will be both sensitive and specific in deter
segmental mobility associated with pain. An mining the presence of abnormal nerve trunk
example of this would be an LS radiculopathy, mechanosensitivity and the presence of nerve
which may have all the features previously dis trunk pain. To date, one study has used this exam
cussed together with an L4/S or an LS/Sl motion ination protocol to determine the incidence of
segment dysfunction. This would then suggest a nerve trunk pain in a particular disorder ( Hall et
spinal cause of the leg pain. Without the palpa aI1997). In this investigation one third of subjects
tion findings it may not be possible to determine with chronic cervicobrachial pain syndrome were
such a cause and further medical investigation found to have neural tissue mechanosensitization
would be necessary to exclude nonmuscu as the dominant source of the subjective complaint
loskeletal causes. Figure 6.11 shows a typical test of pain. Whilst there were no laboratory tests to
technique in the determination of a local area of confirm these physical examination findings, the
pathology. In this patient example, passive inter findings from this study have some validity
vertebral segmental mobility tests reveal dys because all subjects found to have nerve trunk
function at L4/S. pain responded positively to a prescribed treat-
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 87
The onset of muscle activity represents the pain, functional capacity, and cervical spine and
range of oscillatory movement or the treatment shoulder girdle mobility after a 4-week treatment
barrier ( Elvey & Hall 199 7). Should this barrier period utilizing this concept of management.
not be reached, the patient's arm is positioned in Improvements were shown to be maintained 3
a greater range of abduction or elbow extension. months after the end of treatment.
Progression of the technique on subsequent days
is made by performing the technique with the
shoulder in a gradually increased range of CONCLUSION
abduction. At some point in the treatment a
home exercise programme should be incorporat To successfully manage neuropathic pain disor
ed, which is an adjunct to the treatment provid ders it is necessary to make a differential diagno
ed by the clinician. sis. An outline of examination has been presented
Evidence for the effcacy of this type of that will enable differential diagnosis and treat
approach has been demonstrated in subjects with ment prescription. A treatment approach has been
lateral elbow pain (Vicenzino et al 199 5) and briefly outlined, which has been shown to provide
chronic cervicobrachial pain ( Hall et al 199 7). Hall effective relief for chronic cervicobrachial pain suf
et al ( 199 7) showed significant improvements in ferers ( Hall et al199 7).
REFERENCES
Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, Nordal H, Abdelnoor M, Devor M 1991 Neuropathic pain and injured nerve:
Magnaes B 1995 Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and peripheral mechanisms. British Medical Bulletin 47(3):
radiologic features. Spine 20(10): 1178-1186 619-630
Asbury AK, Fields HL 1984 Pain due to peripheral nerve Devor M, Rappaport HZ 1990 Pain and pathophysiology of
damage: an hypothesis. Neurology 34: 1587-1590 damaged nerve. In: Fields HL (ed) Pain Syndromes in
Balster S, Jull G 1997 Upper trapezius muscle activity Neurology. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 47-83
during the brachial plexus tension test in asymptomatic Dyck P 1987 Sciatic Pain Lumbar Discectomy and
subjects. Manual T herapy 2(3): 144-149 Laminectomy. Aspen, Rockville
Bogduk N, Twomey LT 1991 Clinical Anatomy of the Elvey R 1979 Brachial plexus tension tests and the
Lumbar Spine, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, pathoanatomical origin of arm pain. In: Idczak R (ed)
Melbourne Aspects of Manipulative Therapy. Lincoln Institute of
Bove G, Light A 1995 Unmyelinated nociceptors of rat Health Sciences, Melbourne, pp 105-110
paraspinal tissues. Journal of Neurophysiology 73: Elvey RL 1985 Brachial plexus tension tests and the
1752-1762 pathoanatomical origin of arm pain. In: Glasgow EF,
Bove G, Light A 1997 The nervi nervorum: Missing link for Twomey LT, Scull ER, Kleynhans AM, Idczak RM (eds)
neuropathic pain? Pain Forum 6(3): 181-190 Aspects of Manipulative Therapy, 2nd edn. Churchill
Breig A 1978 Adverse Mechanical Tension in the Central Livingstone, Melbourne, pp 116-122
Nervous System: Relief by Functional Neurosurgery. Elvey RL 1986 Treatment of arm pain associated with
Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm abnormal brachial plexus tension. Australian Journal of
Breig A, Troup JOG 1979 Biomechanical considerations of Physiotherapy 32: 225-230
the straight-leg-raising test. Spine 4(3): 242-250 Elvey RL 1998 Commentary: Treatment of arm pain
Butler 0 1989 Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous associated with abnormal brachial plexus tension. In:
system: a model for assessment and treatment. Maher C (ed) Adverse Neural Tension Revisited.
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 35(4): 227-238 Australian Physiotherapy Association, Melbourne, pp
Butler OS 1991 Mobilisation of the Nervous System. 13-17
Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne Elvey R, Hall T 1997 Neural tissue evaluation and
Butler 0 1998 Commentary: Adverse mechanical tension in treatment. In: Donatelli R (ed) Physical Therapy of the
the nervous system: a model for assessment and Shoulder, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp
treatment. In: Maher C (ed) Adverse Neural Tension 131-152
Revisited. Australian Physiotherapy Association, Epstein JA, Epstein BS, Levine LS, Carras R, Rosenthall
Melbourne, pp 33-35 AD, Sumner P 1973 Lumbar nerve root compression at
Dalton PA, Jull GA 1989 The distribution and the intervertebral foramina caused by arthritis of the
characteristics of neck-arm pain in patients with and posterior facet. Journal of Neurosurgery 39: 362-369
without a neurological deficit. Australian Journal of Fahlgren Grampo J, Reynolds HM, Vorro J, Beal M 1991
Physiotherapy 35: 3-8 3-D motion of the pelvis during passive leg lifting. In:
Devor M 1989 The pathophysiology of damaged peripheral Anderson PA, Hobart OJ, Danoff JV (eds)
nerves. In: Wall P Melzack R (eds) Textbook of Pain. Electromyographical Kinesiology. Elsevier Science
Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 63-81 Publishers BV, pp 119-122
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 89
Fields HL 1987 Pain. McGraw Hill, New York circulation and the barrier function of the perineurium.
Goddard MD, Reid JD 1965 Movements induced by Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 55B(2): 390-401
straight leg raising in the lumbo-sacral roots, nerves and Madison Taylor J 1909 Treatment of occupation neuroses
plexus and in the intrapelvic section of the sciatic nerve. and neuritis in the arms. Journal of the American
Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery Psychiatry 28: 12-18 Medical Association 53(3): 198-200
Greening J, Lynn B 1998 Minor peripheral nerve injuries: an Maitland GD 1991 Peripheral Manipulation, 3rd edn.
underestimated source of pain. Manual Therapy 3(4): Butterworth-Heinemann, London
187-194 Marshall J 1883 Nerve stretching for the relief or cure of
Hall T, Elvey RL, Davies N, Dutton L, Moog M 1997 Efficacy pain. British Medical Journal 15: 1173-1179
of manipulative physiotherapy for the treatment of McLellan DL, Swash M 1976 Longitudinal sliding of the
cervicobrachial pain. In: Tenth Biennial conference of the median nerve during movements of the upper limb.
MPAA, Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 39:
Australia. Melbourne, pp 73-74 566-570
Hall T, Quintner J 1996 Responses to mechanical stimulation O'Connell JEA 1951 Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral
of the upper limb in painful cervical radiculopathy. disc. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 33B(1): 8-17
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 42(4): 277-285 Ogato K, Naito M 1986 Blood flow of peripheral nerves:
Hall T, Zusman M, Elvey RL 1995 Manually detected effects of dissection, stretching and compression.
impediments during the straight leg raise test. In: Jull G Journal of Hand Surgery 11: 10
(ed) Clinical Solutions; Ninth Biennial Conference, Olmarker K, Rydevik B 1991 Pathophysiology of sciatica.
Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia. Orthopaedic Clinics of North America 22(2): 223-234
Gold Coast, Queensland, pp 48-53 Quintner J 1998 Peripheral neuropathic pain: a rediscovered
Hall T, Zusman M, Elvey RL 1998 Adverse mechanical clinical entity. In: Annual General Meeting of the
tension in the nervous system? Analysis of straight leg Australian Pain Society. Australian Pain Society, Hobart
raise. Manual Therapy 3(3): 140-146 Rankine J, Fortune D, Hutchinson C, Hughes D, Main C
Henderson CM, Hennessy R, Shuey H 1983 Posterior 1998 Pain drawings in the assessment of nerve root
lateral foraminotomy for an exclusive operative compression: a comparative study with lumbar spine
technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 23(15): 1668-1676
consecutively operated cases. Journal of Neurosurgery Reid S 1987 The Measurement of Tension Changes in the
13: 504-512 Brachial Plexus. In: Dalziel BA, Snowsill JC (Eds)
Howe JF, Loeser JD, Calvin WH 1977 Mechanosensitivity of Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the
dorsal root ganglia and chronically injured axons: a Manipulative Therapists Association of Australia.
physiological basis for the radicular pain of nerve root Melbourne, pp 79-90
compression. Pain 3: 25-41 Sugimoto T, Bennett GJ, Kajanda KC 1989 Strychnine
Hromada J 1963 On the nerve supply of the connective induced transynaptic degeneration of dorsal horn
tissue of some peripheral nervous system components. neurons in rats with an experimental neuropathy.
Acta Anatomica 55: 343-351 Neuroscience Letters 98: 139-143
Kleinrensink G, Stoeckart R, V leeming A, Sjniders C, Mulder Sugiura K, Yoshida T, Katoh S, Mimatsu M 1979 A study on
P 1995 Mechanical tension in the median nerve. The tension signs in lumbar disc hernia. International
effects of joint positions. Clinical Biomechanics 10(5): Orthopaedics 3: 225-228
240-244 Sunderland S 1990 The anatomy and physiology of nerve
Kleynhans AM, Terrett AGJ 1986 The prevention of injury. Muscle and Nerve 13: 771-784
complications from spinal manipulative therapy. In: Thomas PK, Berthold C-H, Ochoa J 1993 Microscopic
Glasgow EF Twomey LT (eds) Aspects of Manipulative anatomy of the peripheral nervous system. In: Dyck PJ,
Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne, pp 171-174 Thomas PK (eds) Peripheral Neuropathy, 3rd edn, Vol. 1.
Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Cam JM 1991 The tissue origin of WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 28-91
low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain responses Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A 1995 Cervical mobilisation:
to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar immediate effects on neural tissue mobility, mechanical
spine using local anaesthesia. Orthopaedic Clinics of hyperalgesia and pain free grip strength in lateral
North America 22(2): 181-187 epicondylitis. In: Jull G (ed) Clinical Solutions.
Kwan MK, Wall EJ, Massie J, Garfin SR 1992 Strain, stress Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia,
and stretch of peripheral nerve: rabbit experiments in Gold Coast, Queensland, pp 155-156
vitro and in vivo. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63(3): Wiesel SW, Tsourmas N, Feffer HL, Citrin CM, Patron as N
267-272 1984 A study of computer-assisted tomography: 1. The
Laird JMA, Bennett GJ 1993 An electrophysiological study incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic
of dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord of rats with an group of patients. Spine 9: 549-551
experimental peripheral neuropathy. Journal of Woolf CJ 1991 Generation of acute pain: central
Neurophysiology 69(6): 2072-2085 mechanisms. British Medical Bulletin 47: 523-533
Lewis J, Ramot R, Green A 1998 Changes in mechanical Yuan Q, Dougherty L, Margulies S 1998 In vivo human
tension in the median nerve: possible implications for the cervical spinal cord deformation and displacement in
upper limb tension test. Physiotherapy 84(6): 254-261 flexion. Spine 23(15): 1677-1683
Louis R 1981 Vertebroradicular and vertebromedullar Zochodne D 1993 Epineural peptides: A role in neuropathic
dynamics. Anatomia Clinica 3: 1-11 pain. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 20:
Lundborg G, Rydevik B 1973 Effects of stretching the tibial 69-72
nerve of the rabbit: a preliminary study of the intraneural Zusman M 1998 Irritability. Manual Therapy 3(4): 195-202
90 LUMBAR SPINE
NERVE TRUNK PAIN: PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT 91
REFERENCES
Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat J, Nordin M, Avouac B, Coppieters MW, Butler OS 2001b In defence of neural
Blotman F, Charlot J, Oreiser RL, Legrand E, Rozenberg mobilisation. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
S, Vautravers P 2000 The role of activity in the therapeutic Physical Therapy. 31(9): 520-521
management of back pain: Report of the international Cowell 1M, Phillips DR 2002 Effectiveness of manipulative
Paris task force on back pain. Spine 25(4): 1S-33S physiotherapy for the treatment of a neurogenic
Allison GT, Nagy BM, Hall TM 2002 A randomised clinical cervicobrachial pain syndrome: A single case study -
trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain experimental design. Manual Therapy 7(1): 31-38
syndrome - a pilot study. Manual Therapy. 7(2): 95-102 Oi Fabio RP 2001a Neural mobilisation: The impossible.
Butler D 2000 The sensitive nervous system. NoiGroup Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Publications, Adelaide 31(5): 224-225
Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Everaert OG, Staes FF Oi Fabio RP 2001b Neural tension, neurodynamics, and
2001a Addition of test components during neural mobilisation. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
neurodynamic testing: Effect of range of motion and Physical Therapy 31(9): 522-522
sensory responses. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Dilley A, Greening J, Lynn B, Leary R, Morris V 2001 The
Physical Therapy 31(5); 226-237 use of cross-correlation analysis between high-
92 LUMBAR SPINE
frequency ultrasound images to measure longitudinal Maravilla KR, Bowen BC 1998 Imaging of the peripheral
median nerve movement. Ultrasound in Medicine and nervous system: Evaluation of peripheral neuropathy
Biology. 27(9): 1211-1218 and plexopathy. American Journal of Neuroradiology
Gifford L 2001 Acute low cervical nerve root conditions: 19:1011-1023
symptom presentations and pathobiological reasoning. Milidonis MK, Ritter RC, Sweeney MA, Godges JJ, Knapp
Manual Therapy 6(2); 106-115 J, Antonucci E 1997 Practical analysis survey:
Greening J, Lynn B, Leary R, Warren L, O' Higgins P, Hall reval idation of advanced clinical practice in orthopaedic
Craggs M 2001 The use of ultrasound imaging to physical therapy. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
demonstrate reduced movement of the median nerve Physical Therapy 25: 163-170
during wrist flexion in patients with non-specific arm O'Sullivan P, Twomey, L, Allison G 1997 Evaluation of
pain. Journal of Hand Surgery 26(5): 401-406 specific stabilising exercises in the treatment of chronic
Hall T, Elvey R 2001 Eval uation and treatment of neural low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylosis
tissue pain disorders. In: Donatelli RA, Wooden MJ (eds) or spondylolisthesis. Spine 22: 2959-2967
Orthopaedic Physical Therapy, 3rd edn. Churchill Qu intner JL, Bove G 2001 From neuralgia to peripheral
Livingstone, Philadelphia neuropathic pain: Evolution of a concept. Regional
Jull G, Moore A 2000 Evidence based practices: T he need Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine 26: 368-372
for research directions. Manual Therapy 5(3): 131 Spitzer W 1987 Scientific approach to the assessment and
Loewe J 2001 Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance management of activity-related spinal disorders: a
imaging of abnormalities of the peripheral nerves. monograph for clinicians, report of the Quebec Task
Canadian Association Radiology Journal 52(5): 292-301 Force on spinal disorders. Spine 12: 9-54
CHAPTER CON TEN T S
Introduction 93
INTRODUCTION
thrust, manipulation with impulse, grade V mobi rotation may exacerbate back pain. This results in
lization. Despite the different nomenclature, the loss of patient cooperation, patient resistance and
common feature in techniques of this type is that failed technique. Procedures to minimize lumbar
they achieve a pop or cracking sound within syn spine rotation leverage can reduce patient discom
ovial joints. The cause of this audible release (pop fort and enhance technique delivery. This article
or crack) is open to some speculation but is wide will review the 'pop' or 'crack' phenomena, clini
ly accepted to represent cavitation of a spinal cal indications and contraindications associated
zygapophyseal joint (Brodeur 1995). The audible with manipulation and focus upon a model of
release distinguishes HVLA thrust techniques patient positioning and spinal locking that can
from other manual therapy interventions. assist in achieving the safe and effective application
Spinal locking is necessary for long lever HVLA of HVLA thrust techniques in the lumbar spine.
thrust techniques to localize forces and achieve This model minimizes the amount of the rotation
cavitation at a specific vertebral segment used in the build-up of leverages and spinal lock
(Stoddard1972; Downing1985; Bea11989; Kappler ing and enhances patient comfort and cooperation.
1989; Nyberg 1993; Greenman 1996; Hartman
1997). Short lever HVLA thrust techniques do not
require locking of adjacent spinal segments. CAVITATION ASSOCIATED WITH
Locking can be achieved by either facet apposition HIGH-VELOCITY LOW-AMPLITUDE
or the utilization of ligamentous myofascial ten THRUST TECHNIQUES
sion or a combination of both (Stoddard 1972;
Downing1985; Bea11989; Nyberg 1993; Greenman Research involving the metacarpophalangeal joint
1996; Hartman 1997). The principle used in these indicates that the audible release is generated by
approaches is to position the spine in such a way a cavitation mechanism resulting from a drop in
that leverage is localized to one joint without the internal joint pressure (Roston & Haines 1947;
undue strain being placed upon adjacent spinal Unsworth et aI 1972; Meal & Scott 1986; Watson &
segments. The principle of facet apposition lock Mollan 1990). Following cavitation, there is an
ing is to apply leverages to the spine that cause the increase in the size of the joint space and gas is
facet joints of uninvolved segments to be apposed found within that space (Roston & Haines 1947;
and consequently locked. To achieve locking by Unsworth et aI1972; Meal & Scott 1986; Mierau et
facet apposition the spine is placed in a position a11988; Watson & MoHan 1990). The gas bubble
opposite to that of normal coupling behaviour. The has been described as 80% carbon dioxide
vertebral segment at which the therapist wishes to (Unsworth et al 1972), or having the density of
produce cavitation should never be locked. nitrogen (Greenman 1996). The gas bubble
Lumbar spine rotation manipulation is com remains within the joint for between 15 and 30
monly used in the treatment of low back pain with min (Roston & Haines 1947; Unsworth et aI 1972;
increasing evidence of efficacy for acute low back Meal & Scott 1986; Mierau et a11988; Greenman
pain (Waddell 1998). To maximize positive out 1996), which is consistent with the time taken for
comes from HVLA thrust techniques it is essential the gas to be re-absorbed into the synovial fluid
that their use be preceded by a thorough patient (Unsworth et aI1972).
history and physical assessment and that due An increased range of joint motion immediate
attention has been given to clinical indications and ly following cavitation has been demonstrated
contraindications. The use of HVLA thrust tech (Mierau et a11988; Surkitt et a1 2000) with a num
niques must be considered within the context of a ber of studies reporting that thrust techniques are
comprehensive patient management plan, which associated with a temporary increase in the range
may include the application of other manual ther of spinal motion (Howe et a1 1983; Nansel et al
apy and adjunctive techniques. 1989; Nansel et al1990; Cassidy et a11992; Nansel
Patient comfort is a prerequisite for successful et al 1992; Nilsson et al 1996; Surkitt et al 2000).
HVLA thrust technique. Excessive lumbar spine Longer-term effects of HVLA thrust techniques
PATIEN T PO SI T IONING AND SPINA L LOCKING FOR LUMBAR SPINE RO TATION MANIPU LAT ION 95
have also been reported (Nordemar & Thorner myofascial structures, and related vascular,
1981; Stodolny & Chmielewski 1989) and it is pos lymphatic, and neural elements (Glossary Review
Committee of the Educational COW1cil on
tulated these may be due to reflex mechanisms
Osteopathic Principles 1993).
that either directly cause muscle relaxation or
inhibit pain (Brodeur 1995). Specific criteria in identifying areas of dysfunction
Repeated 'cracking' or 'popping' associated have been developed. The diagnosis of somatic
with cavitation of the joints of the hand has not dysfunction is made on the basis of several posi
been shown to be linked with an increased inci tive findings and is identified by the A-R-T-T of
dence of degenerative change (Swezey & Swezey diagnosis (Table 7.2).
1975; Castellanos & Axelrod 1990).
an argument might be made that there are specif Acute joint locking Gainsbury 1985
ic effects relating to thrust techniques that may not Bruckner & Khan 1994
Zusman 1994
be evoked by other manual interventions. Various
Motion loss with Kuchera & Kuchera 1992
authors have described specific indications for the
somatic dysfunction Kappler 1997
use of HVLA thrust techniques (Table 7.1).
Somatic dysfunction Bourdillon et al 1992
It is recognized that the use of HVLA thrust Kimberly 1992
techniques must be considered within the context Greenman 1996
of a comprehensive patient management plan, Restore bony alignment Nyberg & Basmajian 1993
which includes the application of other manual Maigne 1996
techniques and adjunctive therapies. After con Meniscoid entrapment Kenna & Murtagh 1989
sidering safety issues and excluding contraindi Lewit 1991
Bogduk & Twomey 1991
cations, a number of treatment models use the Maigne 1996
diagnosis of somatic dysfunction as the basis for Sammut & Searle-Barnes 1998
the selection of HVLA thrust techniques Adhesions Stoddard 1969
(DiGiovanna 1991; Bourdillon et a1 1992; Kuchera Displaced disc fragment Cyriax 1975
& Kuchera 1994; Mitchell 1995; Greenman 1996;
Pain modulation Hoehler et al 1981
Kappler 1997). Terrett & Vernon 1984
Kenna & Murtagh 1989
Zusman 1994
Brodeur 1995
DIAGNOSIS OF SOMATIC
Reflex relaxation of Fisk 1979
DYSFUNCTION muscles Neumann 1989
Kenna & Murtagh 1989
The accepted definition for Somatic Dysfunction Kuchera & Kuchera 1994
Brodeur 1995
is as follows.
Reprogramming of the Bourdillon et al 1992
Somatic dysfw1ction is an impaired or altered central nervous system
fW1ction of related components of the somatic (body
Release of endorphins Vernon et al 1986
framework) system: skeletal, arthrodial and
96 LUMBAR SPINE
therapeutic intervention. HVLA techniques are T. Undue tenderness at involved May or may not be
distinguished from other manual therapy tech segment present
niques because the practitioner applies a rapid Pain provocation May or may not be
present
thrust or impulse. Thrust or impulse techniques
PATIENT PO SI TIONING AND SPINA L LOCKING FOR LUMBAR SPINE RO TATION MANIPU LATION 97
• Psychological dependence upon HVLA thrust standing of the biomechanics associated with cou
technique pled movements of the lumbar spine in different
• Ligamentous laxity postures allows the practitioner to decide on opti
• Arterial calcification. mal pre-thrust positioning. Primary and second
ary joint leverages are required to facilitate
The above list is not intended to cover all possible effective localization of forces to a specific segment
clinical situations. Patients who have pathology of the spine prior to application of the thrust
may also have coincidental spinal pain and dis (Gibbons & Tehan 2000).
comfort arising from mechanical dysfunction that Evidence supports the view that spinal posture
may benefit from manipulative treatment. and positioning alters coupling behaviour (Fryette
The use of manipulation techniques under gen 1954; Panjabi et al 1989; Vicenzino & Twomey
eral anaesthesia for low back pain is associated 1993). Coupling behaviour is different in the
with an increased risk of serious neurological flexed position when compared to the
damage (Haldeman & Rubinstein 1992). There is neutral! extended position. This has implications
no evidence that this approach for the treatment for joint locking in the lumbar spine.
of low back pain is effective (CSAG 1994). There is evidence to support the view that, in
Rotation left
Figure 7.2 Type 2 movement - sidebending and rotation Figure 7.3 Neutral/extension positioning.
occur to the same side. (Reproduced with permission (Reproduced with permission from Gibbons and
from Gibbons and Tehan 1998, Muscle energy concepts Tehan 2000, Manipulation of the Spine, T horax and
and coupled motion of the spine. Manual Therapy 3(2): Pelvis: An Osteopathic Perspective. Churchill
9S-101. Livingstone, Edinburgh ( Fig. B3.3.3, p214.))
100 LUMBAR SPINE
Figure 7.4 Neutral/extension positioning. Type 2 Figure 7.5 Flexion positioning. (Reproduced with
locking - rotation and sidebending to the same permission from Gibbons and Tehan 2000,
side, i.e. sidebending right and rotation right. Manipulation of the Spine, T horax and Pelvis: An
(Reproduced with permission from Gibbons and Osteopathic Perspective. Churchill Livingstone,
Tehan 2000, Manipulation of the Spine, T horax and Edinburgh ( Fig. 83.4.1, p220.))
Pelvis: An Osteopathic Perspective. Churchill
Livingstone, Edinburgh ( Fig. 83.3.5, p216.))
FLEXION POSITIONING
RIGIIT ARM
The patient's lumbar and thoracic spinal regions STA81UZES
Figure 7.7 Neutral/extension positioning. Trunk F igure 7.8 Neutral/extension positioning. Type 2
sidebending to the right. (Reproduced with permission locking - rotation and sidebending to the same
from Gibbons and Tehan 2000, Manipulation of the side, i.e. sidebending right and rotation right.
Spine, Thorax and Pelvis: An Osteopathic Perspective. (Reproduced with permission from Gibbons and
Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh ( Fig. 83.5.2, p227.)) Tehan 2000, Manipulation of the Spine, Thorax and
Pelvis: An Osteopathic Perspective. Churchill
Livingstone, Edinburgh ( Fig. 83.5.3, p228.))
patient. In such circumstances the operator will Inability to acrueve cavitation with minimal force
need to adjust patient positioning to facilitate effec may arise for a number of different reasons and
tive localization of forces. To achieve trus, the oper can be evaluated under three broad headings
ator must develop the palpatory skills necessary to (Gibbons & Tehan 2000):
sense appropriate pre-thrust tension and leverage
1. General technique analysis
prior to delivering the HVLA thrust.
2. Practitioner and patient variables
3. Physical and biomechanical modifying
factors.
TECHNIQUE FAILURE AND
ANALYSIS
REFERENCES
Beal MC 1989 Teaching of basic principles of osteopathic Kappler RE 1989 Direct action techniques. In: Beal MC (ed)
manipulative techniques. In: Beal MC (ed) The principles The Principles of Palpatory Diagnosis and Manipulative
of Palpatory Diagnosis and Manipulative Technique. Technique. American Academy of Osteopathy, Newark
American Academy of Osteopathy, Newark Kappler R 1997 Thrust techniques. In: Ward R (ed)
Bogduk N, Twomey L 1991 Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. Williams and
Spine, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Melbourne Wilkins, Baltimore
Bourdillon J, Day E, Bookhout M 1992 Spinal Manipulation, Kenna C, Murtagh J 1989 Back Pain and Spinal
5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford Manipulation, 2nd edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford
Brodeur R 1995 The audible release associated with joint Kimberly P 1992 Formulating a prescription for osteopathic
manipulation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological manipulative treatment. In: Beal M (ed) The Principles of
Therapeutics 18(3): 155-164 Palpatory Diagnosis and Manipulative Technique.
Bruckner P, Khan K 1994 Clinical Sports Medicine. American Academy of Osteopathy, Ohio
McGraw-Hili, Sydney Kuchera W, Kuchera M 1992 Osteopathic Principles in
Cassidy JD, Quon J A, Lafrance L J, Yong-Ying K 1992 The Practice. KCOM press, Kirksville, Missouri
effect of manipulation on pain and range of motion in Kuchera W, Kuchera M 1994 Osteopathic Principles in
the cervical spine: A pilot study. Journal of Manipulative Practice. Greyden Press, Ohio
and Physiological Therapeutics 15(8): 495-500 Lewit K 1991 Manipulative T herapy in Rehabilitation of the
Castellanos J, Axelrod D 1990 Effect of habitual knuckle Locomotor System, 2nd edn. Butterworth Heinemann,
cracking on hand function. Annals of Rheumatic Disease Oxford
49: 308-309 Maigne R 1996 Diagnosis and Treatment of Pain of
CSAG 1994 Back pain. Clinical Standards Advisory Group Vertebral Origin. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Report. HMSO, London Meal G, Scott R 1986 Analysis of the joint crack by
Cyriax J 1975 Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine, Vol 1, 6th simultaneous recording of sound and tension. Journal of
edn. Balliere Tindall, London Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 9: 189-195
DiGiovanna E 1991 Somatic dysfunction. In: DiGiovanna E, Mierau D, Cassidy J, Bowen V, Dupuis P, Noftall F 1988
Schiowitz S (eds) An Osteopathic Approach to Manipulation and mobilization of the third
Diagnosis and Treatment. Lippincott, Philadelphia metacarpophalangeal joint: a quantitative radiographic
Downing CH 1985 Principles and Practice of Osteopathy. and range of motion study. Manual Medicine 3: 135-140
Tamor Pierston Publishers, London Mitchell F 1995 The Muscle Energy Manual. MET Press,
Eder M, Tilscher H 1990 Chiropractic Therapy. Diagnosis Michigan
and Treatment. Aspen Publications, Maryland Nansel D, Cremata E, Carlson J, Szlazak M 1989 Effect of
Fisk J 1979 A contolled trial of manipulation in a selected unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically assessed
group of patients with low back pain favouring one side. cervical lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in
New Zealand Medical Journal 90(645): 288-291 otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Manipulative
Fryette H 1954 (Re-print 1990) Principles of Osteopathic and Physiological Therapeutics 12(6): 419-427
Technic. American Academy of Osteopathy, Newark Nansel D, Peneff A, Carlson J, Szlazak M 1990 Time course
Gainsbury J 1985 High-velocity thrust and pathophysiology considerations for the effects of unilateral lower cervical
of segmental dysfunction. In: Glasgow E, Twomey L , adjustments with respect to the amelioration of cervical
Sculle E , Kleynhans A , Idczak R (eds) Aspects of lateral-flexion passive end-range asymmetry. Journal of
Manipulative Therapy, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 13(6):
Melbourne 297-304
Gibbons P, Tehan P 2000 Manipulation of the Spine, Thorax Nansel D, Peneff A, Quitoriano D 1992 Effectiveness of
and Pelvis: An Osteopathic Perspective. Churchill upper verses lower cervical adjustments with respect to
Livingstone, Edinburgh the amelioration of passive rotational verses lateral
Glossary Review Committee of the Educational Council on flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise
Osteopathic Principles 1993 Glossary of osteopathic asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Manipulative and
terminology. In: Allen TW (ed). AOA Yearbook and Physiological Therapeutics 15(2): 99-105
Directory of Osteopathic Physicians. American Neumann H 1989 Introduction to Manual Medicine.
Osteopathic Association, Chicago Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Greenman PE 1996 Principles of Manual Medicine, 2nd Nilsson N, Christenson HW, Hartrigson J 1996 Lasting
edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore changes in passive range of motion after spinal
Haldeman S, Rubinstein S 1992 Cauda equina syndrome in manipulation: A randomised, blind, controlled trial.
patients undergoing manipulation of the lumbar spine. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Spine 17: 1469-1473 19(3): 165-168
Hartman L 1997 Handbook of Osteopathic Technique, 3rd Nordemar R, Thorner C 1981 Treatment of acute cervical
edn. Chapman & Hall, London pain: a comparative group study. Pain 10: 93-101
Hoehler F, Tobis J, Buerger A 1981 Spinal manipulation for Nyberg R 1993 Manipulation: Definition, types, application
low back pain. Journal of the American Medical In: Basmajian J, Nyberg R (eds) Rational Manual
Association 245: 1835-1838 Therapies. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Howe DH, Newcombe RG, Wade MT 1983 Manipulation of Nyberg R, Basmajian J 1993 Rationale for the use of spinal
the cervical spine: A pilot study. Journal of the Royal manipulation. In: Basmajian J, Nyberg R (eds) Rational
College of General Practitioners 33(254): 574-579 Manual Therapies. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
104 LUMBAR SPINE
Panjabi M, Yamamoto I, Oxland T, Crisco J 1989 How does Swezey R, Swezey S 1975 The consequences of habitual
posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine? Spine 14(9): knuckle cracking. Western Journal of Medicine 122:
1002-1011 377-379
Roston J, Haines R 1947 Cracking in the Terrett A, Vernon H 1984 Manipulation and pain tolerance. A
metacarpophalangeal joint. Journal of Anatomy 81: controlled study on the effect of spinal manipulation on
165-173 paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels. American
Royal College of General Practitioners 1996 Clinical Journal of Physical Medicine 63: 217-225
guidelines on acute and recurrent low back pain. RCGP, Unsworth A, Dowson D, Wright V 1972 Cracking joints: a
London bioengineering study of cavitation in the
Sammut E, Searle-Barnes P 1998 Osteopathic Diagnosis. metacarpophalangeal joint. Annals of Rheumatic
Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham Disease 30: 348-358
Senstad 0, Leboeuf-Yde C, Borchgrevink C 1997 Frequency Vernon H, Dharmi I, Howley T, Annett R 1986 Spinal
and characteristics of side effects of spinal manipulative manipulation and beta-endorphin: a controlled study of
therapy. Spine 22(4): 435-440 the effect of a spinal manipulation on plasma beta
Stoddard A 1969 Manual of Osteopathic Practice. endorphin levels in normal males. Journal of
Hutchinson Medical Publications, London Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 9: 115-123
Stoddard A 1972 Manual of Osteopathic Technique, 2nd edn. Vicenzino G, Twomey L 1993 Side flexion induced lumbar
Hutchinson Medical Publications, London spine conjunct rotation and its influencing factors.
Stodolny J, Chmielewski H 1989 Manual therapy in the Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 39(4): 299-306
treatment of patients with cervical migraine. Manual Waddell G 1998 The Back Pain Revolution. Churchill
Medicine 4: 49-51 Livingstone, Edinburgh
Surkitt D, Gibbons P, McLaughlin P 2000 High velocity low Watson P, Mollan R 1990 Cineradiography of a cracking
amplitude manipulation of the atlanto-axial joint: effect on joint. British Journal of Radiology 63: 145-147
atlanto-axial and cervical spine rotation asymmetry in Zusman M 1994 What does manipulation do? The need for
asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine basic research. In: Boyling J, Palastanga M (eds)
3(1): 13-19 Grieve's Modern Manual Therapy, 2nd edn. Churchill
Livingstone, New York
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 105
Diagnosis 105
The management of low
Other diagnostic tests 108
back pain in pregnancy
Palpation testing 108
S. E. Sandler
Common problems 108
The Expectant Mothers Clinic, London; The British
Treatment of pain of lumbar origin 108 School of Osteopathy, London, UK
INTRODUCTION
DIAGNOSIS
105
106 LUMBAR SPINE
analysis of the joints throughout the spine and are self-referred. A differential diagnosis is essen
pelvis, as well as the supporting muscles and lig tial as not all back pain in pregnancy is of mechan
aments, so as to devise a treatment programme ical origin. A full and comprehensive medical
based on the individual and her specific needs. history, as well as an obstetric case history, is taken
at the first visit to exclude any cases that might be
unsuitable for treatment. At the clinic there have
CASE HISTORY ANALYSIS
been patients with pre-eclampsia complaining of
Patients coming into the Expectant Mothers Clinic headaches, patients with back pain that were false
are referred by their CP, consultant or midwife, or labours or urinary tract infections, and even one
case of a primiparous woman at 30 weeks, who
had not seen her midwife for a fortnight, who had
Table 8.1 Differential diagnosis of lumbar spine pain and
sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. oedema presenting as pain in the hand and finger,
which were so swollen the patient was unable to
Disc disease has the following characteristics in open the door without assistance.
relation to pain:
Otherwise, the case history analysis at this stage
Morning pain and stiffness is very similar to the standard case history that one
Weight-bearing component might expect in any practice that specializes in
Age of the patient
Increased abdominal pressure provokes pain
manual therapy. Table 8.1 illustrates some common
Sleep not usually disturbed differential diagnostic questions. Practitioners
Eases as day progresses and then gets worse again should remember, however, that patients may suf
History of repeated micro-trauma
Movement eases pain but not for long, i.e. fidgets
fer from more than one complaint at a time, often
Going up hill provokes pain giving rise to mixed symptom pictures.
Sitting too long provokes pain, especially in low chairs Once the musculoskeletal questions have been
Getting out of a chair provokes pain
DaWdling-type walking provokes pain, again because of the
asked, specific obstetric questions relating to the
prolonged weight-bearing and overuse of fatigued postural current pregnancy and previous pregnancies are
muscles asked to ascertain the likelihood of the pain being
Cocktail party back syndrome
non-musculoskeletal in nature; if it is, it lies outwith
Facet joint involvement has the following characteristics the scope of this article.
in relation to pain:
!
could prevent the lordosis from developing. Also,
if the patient has had several children in a short
The anterior posture The posterior posture
space of time her abdominal muscles are more
The weight of the gravid The weight of the gravid likely to have lost tone and thus not support the
uterus is carried anterior uterus is carried posterior weight of the growing foetus. This could lead to
to the normal centre of to the normal centre of
gravity gravity
the establishment of the lordosis too early with all
of the attendant problems.
Figure 8.1 The postures of late pregnancy. Previous traumas and low back pain. If the
patient had a history of low back pain before her
posture with an anterior carriage where the pregnancy, the resultant state of the muscu
weight falls on the vertebral bodies or the discs. loskeletal system, plus the presence or absence of
Sometimes with an anterior carriage the weight scar tissue, will again compromise the ability of her
falls on the pubic symphysis causing pubalgia posture to change during the pregnancy. The facet
and, in really severe cases, a diastasis of the pubis. joints in the lumbar spine are usually orientated in
The spine is in a dynamic state during preg a sagittal direction and not designed to carry body
nancy because of the hormonal changes, and the weight. However, sometimes they lie coronally
hyperlaxity of the ligaments is not restricted to the and are thus weight-bearing and predisposed to
lumbar spine and pelvis alone. With the increase degenerative changes. If the subject had weight
in size and weight of the breast tissues there is an bearing facets in her lower lumbar spine before she
increase in the expected thoracic kyphosis, with a became pregnant, the posterior centre of gravity
corresponding increase in cervical lordosis to com and lordosis will provoke symptoms fairly early
pensate. The arms and shoulders are medially on. Likewise, if she has a grade 1 spondylolisthe
rotated and protracted, giving a greater potential sis and is carrying anteriorly, this might well pro
for thoracic outlet syndromes, which should not voke the situation and produce a slippage with all
be confused with carpal tunnel syndromes caused of the attendant clinical signs and symptoms.
by oedema. All of these factors are variable and the extent
The factors that control which sort of posture of any or all of them in any individual patient will
the subject will develop include the following. determine her ability to adapt during her preg
The patient's morphology. Taller, thinner women nancy. It naturally follows that they will also
are more prone to develop an anterior posture and determine the ability of the patient to form a lor
shorter, fatter women a lordosis. dosis or an anterior posture.
108 LUMBAR SPINE
shows that the joints can start to become mobile Mothers Clinic was opened, this author spent
very early on in the pregnancy, long before this many hours researching the effects of the HVT par
physiological need arises. Just why this occurs is ticularly during pregnancy. Unfortunately, there is
one of the many questions that needs to be solved very little written in the literature. There has not
before we fully understand why women suffer been one reported case, in the literature, of mis
low back pain in pregnancy. carriage caused by the use of a manipulation dur
The aim of treatment therefore should be to ing pregnancy. However, there are times when
relieve symptoms in the short term and to prevent spontaneous abortion is more common. According
long-term dysfunction. to standard obstetric tables, weeks 12 and 16 are
It is best to treat the patient in sidelying or sit the times of highest risk for spontaneous abortion;
ting positions during pregnancy to avoid too therefore, it is probably best to withhold any man
much pressure by the gravid uterus on the vena ual treatment at this time in order to minimize any
cava. In the short term, treatment is aimed at possible risk that might occur. In addition, the trau
relieving the acute painful situation. This usually ma of a miscarriage is one that affects the therapist
involves facet or joint locking with accompanying as well as the patient and there is no evidence to
muscular hypertonia, and ligamentous overstrain. warrant self-blame for a condition that would have
occurred naturally.
Some patients present with a history of threat
HIGH-VELOCITY T HRUST
ened miscarriage or repeated spontaneous abor
TECHNIQUES FOR T HE LUMBAR
tions. These patients are best treated after the
SPINE
start of week 20 when the potential risk is very
The treatment of choice for a locked facet is a small indeed.
manipulation or high-velocity thrust (HVT). An From a practical point of view, the standard
HVT is a short-amplitude, high-velocity manoeu lumbar roll techniques are made very difficult
vre aimed at breaking facet restriction and relax because of the size of the gravid foetus, especial
ing intrinsic muscle tone. The technique works via ly in the last trimester when this sort of mechani
a neuromuscular reflex arc locally. If the joint con cal back pain is so common (Fig. 8.2).
cerned is palpated before and after the manoeuvre, The problem with the standard technique is that
the change in range of motion should determine if it uses rotation to impart a force to move the infe
the manoeuvre has achieved its objective. rior facet in question away from the superior facet.
It is important to comment on the safety of the Take for example a manoeuvre designed to reduce
HVT during pregnancy. Before the Expectant facet fixation at L4/5 on the right. The patient lies
on her left side with the painful facet joint upper
most. The mobility of pregnancy plus the bulk of
the gravid uterus dictates that the minimum of
leverage should be used, and the thrust should be
in the midrange of the joint's possible motion. The
direction of the thrust is all-important. One of the
initial parameters used is flexion and extension,
which is designed to focus the force at the joint in
question. The legs are set with the bottom leg
straight and the top leg crossed at the ankle. Care
is taken to palpate the joint with the left hand
whilst the right imparts a small amount of flexion
to the trunk via the lower arm just sufficient to
reach the point of tension at the palpating hand.
The minimum of force must be used here because
Figure 8.2 Modified lumbar roll. with too much flexion, the localization of forces
110 LUMBAR SPINE
LIGAMENTOUS STRETC H
TECHNIQUES FOR THE LUMBAR
SPINE
The patient lies on her side, usually with the most
painful side uppermost. The therapist flexes the
top leg and holds it against the front of their
thighs. The technique is performed with a slow
rocking movement of the top hip into flexion, the
right hand palpating between the spinous
processes of the lumbar spine, and the left forearm
pulling along the length of the spine via a hold on
the sacrum so as to reinforce the technique from
below (Fig. 8.5).
This technique is particularly helpful in cases
of tight ligaments caused by shortening of the pos
terior structures or weight-bearing facets brought
about by a lordotic posture.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Berg G, Hammer M, Moller-Neilson J, Linden U, Thornblad Maclennan A H 1991 The role of the hormone Relaxin in
J 1988 Low back pain during pregnancy. Acta human reproduction and pelvic girdle relaxation.
Obstetrica Gynaecologica 71: 71-75 Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology Supplement 88:
Bullock JE, Jull G, Bullock MI 1987 The relationship of low 7-15
back pain to the postural changes of pregnancy. Mantle MJ, Greenwood RM, Currey HCF 1977 Backache in
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 33: 11-17 pregnancy. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation 16: 95-101
Bryant-Greenwood GD 1991 Human decidual and placental Mantle MJ, Holmes J, Currey HCF 1981 Backache in
relaxins.Reproduction Fertility and Development 3(4): pregnancy II: Prophylactic influence of back care
385-389 classes. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation 20: 227-232
DiGiovanna E L, Schiowitz S 1991 An Osteopathic Approach Moore K, Dumas GA, Reid JG 1990 Postural changes
to Diagnosis and Treatment.Lippincott, Philadelphia associated with pregnancy and their relationship to low
Dunnihoo D 1992 Fundamentals of Obstetrics and back pain.Journal of Clinical Biomechanics.5: 169-174
Gynaecology. 3rd edn, Lippincott Philadelphia, p.503(a), Ostgaard HC, Anderson GB, Schultz AB, Miller JA 1993
p.348(b) Influence of some biomechanical factors in low back
Hartman L S 1985 A Handbook of Osteopathic Technique. pain in pregnancy.Spine 18(1): 61-65
2nd edn. Hutchinson , London Sandler SE 1996 A survey of the first 400 cases seen in The
Llewelyn Jones D 1986 In: Fundamentals of Obstetrics and Expectant Mothers Clinic at The British School of
Gynaecology, 4th edn, Faber and Faber, London. p. 182 Osteopathy. Unpublished data
CHAPTER CONTEN T S
Introduction 115
Treatment 123 The management of chronic low back and leg pain
Conclusion 124
has always provided a challenge fortherapists. This
paper examines the influence of a repetitive move
ment such as walking as a possible causative factor
of chronic low back pain (LBP). Diminished shock
absorption and limited hip extension and external
rotation are hypothesized to affect the mobility of
the lumbar spine. These compensatory changes can
result in lumbar spine dysfunction. Treatment
must, therefore, be directed not only at increasing
the mobility of the hips and thoracic spine, but at
the stability of the lumbar spine. Sometimes, how
ever, the symptoms can be exacerbated by treat
ment, so the neural tissue needs to be unloaded to
optimize the treatment outcome. This can be
achieved by taping the buttock and down the leg,
following the dermatome to shorten the inflamed
tissue. Manual Therapy (2002) 7(4): 183-192
INTRODUCTION
lateral flexion range, a long back, reduced lumbar ual imbalances in the movement system where
lordosis, increased psychological distress and pre spinal level/s develop increasing mobility as com
vious nonserious LBP (Adams et aI1999). Despite pensation for restrictions in adjacent areas.
extensive research in the area of prevention and (Comerford & Mottram 2001b; Sahrmann 2002).
management of LBP, the effectiveness of the treat This article will examine the effects of hip stiffness,
ment has, on the whole, been quite poor. lower limb loading and thoracic spine restriction
Treatment success is more common with acute as a precursor to lumbar spine dysfunction (insta
LBP, but as highlighted in the literature, the major bility) and pain. Some new directions in treatment
ity of LBP sufferers will spontaneously recover will also be offered.
within a month of the episode, regardless of the
type of treatment. However, it has been found on
MRI that multifidus muscle atrophy is present in NEUTRAL ZONE, INSTABILITY AND
80% of patients with LBP (Kader et al 2 000) and SYMPTOM PRODUCTION
the multifidus seems to remain atrophied even
though spontaneous recovery from LBP has Spinal stability requires the interaction of three
occurred(Hides et aI1996). systems- passive (the vertebrae, ligaments, fas
Chronic LBP seems to be a quite different sce cia and discs), active (the muscles acting on the
nario. 1t has been described as a 'complex disorder spine) and neural (central nervous system and
that must be managed aggressively with a multi nerves controlling the muscles) (Panjabi 1992a).
disciplinary approach that addresses physical, Theoretically, the most vulnerable area of the
pyschological and socioeconomic aspects of the ill spine (the neutral zone) occurs around the neu
ness' (Wheeler 1995). In fact, all the recent literature tral position of a spinal segment, where little
examining chronic LBP has attributed this condi resistance is offered by the passive structures
tion to primarily psychosocial factors(Cats-Baril & (Panjabi 1992b). If decreased passive stability
Frymoyer 1991; Feuerstein& Beattie 1995; Zusman occurs, the active and neural systems can com
1998; Andersson 1999; Kendall 1999; Lundberg pensate by providing the spine with dynamic sta
1999; Hadjistavropoulos & LaChapelle2000; Maras bility. Stability around the neutral zone can be
et al 2000). This is probably because chronic LBP increased by muscle activity of as little as 1-3%
usually does not respond to treatment directed (Cholewicki et al 1997). Uncompensated dys
locally at the site of symptoms, so the patient is function, however, will ultimately cause pathol
often blamed for treatment failure. Physiotherapists ogy (Panjabi 1992a).
examine spinal movements in detail, but often fail How long will it take before uncompensated
to examine other dynamic activities, such as walk movement causes symptoms? The answer to this
ing, getting out of a chair and lifting the arms. question is probably best determined by Dye's
Patients with chronic back and leg pain frequently model of tissue homeostasis of a joint (1996). Dye
complain of increasing pain not only with pro contends that symptoms will only occur when an
longed sitting, but with walking and standing. In individual is no longer operating inside his/her
many situations, patients are reluctant to seek fur envelope of function (see Fig. 9. 1), reaching a par
ther treatment as they are concerned that their ticular threshold thereby causing a complex bio
symptoms will be exacerbated. The practitioner logical cascade of trauma and repair which is
therefore, needs to employ strategies that will min manifested clinically as pain and swelling. The
imize the aggravation of the symptoms and facili threshold, which varies from individual to indi
tate the rehabilitation of the patient. It may be vidual, depends on the amount and the frequen
difficult for the clinician to determine the cause and cy of the loading (Dye 1996; Novacheck 1997;
origin of the back pain as there may be confound Schache et aI1999). Breaching the threshold will
ing hyper/hypomobility problems of the sur diminish the patient's envelope of function, caus
rounding soft tissues. Chronic low back and leg ing activities that initially were not painful for a
pain could therefore be seen as the result of habit- patient to become painful. Four factors (anatomic,
LUMBAR SPINE: CHRONIC BACK AND LEG PAIN 117
sequencing of motor units, spinal reflex mecha ly rotated femurs often demonstrates a decrease in
nisms, muscle strength and motor control (the forward bending because the femurs are at the end
active and neural subsystems described by of range of rotation at the beginning of movement
Panjabi). The physiological factors involve the and cannot rotate further during the forward bend
genetically determinedmechanisms of molecular ing. Movement will have to increase elsewhere
and cellular homeostasis that determine the qual (usually in the lumbar spine), if the forward bend
ity and rate of repair of damaged tissues. ing range is going to be maintained. This con
Treatment factors include the type of rehabilita tention has been supported in part by the work of
tion or surgery received. Hamilton and Richardson (1998), who found that
The therapist can have a positive influence on individuals with LBP used more lumbar spine
the patient's envelope of function by minimizing movement than individuals with no LBP during
the aggravation of the inflamed tissue and can forward leaning in sitting, indicating an increase in
even increase the patient's threshold of function relative spinal flexibility in these individuals.
by improving the control over the mobile seg It has been observed clinically that a large num
ments (O'Sullivan2000), and the movement of the ber of LBP sufferers have internally rotated
stiff segments. femurs. Internal rotation of the femurs not only
affects forward bending of the spine but reduces
the range of hip movement into extension and
JOINT STIFFNESS AND STARTING external rotation. This causes an increase in the
POSITION rotary movement required in the lumbar spine
when the patient walks. The internal rotation in
Therapists often considerjoint stiffness and soft tis the hip also causes tightness in the iliotibial band
sue tightness, be it muscle, fascial or neural, as and diminished activity in the gluteus medius
118 LUMBAR SPINE
arthrodesis on gait in adolescents. All subjects imum range of rotation of an intervertebral disc
showed excessive motion in the joint above and without injury is about 31(Bogduk & Twomey
below the arthrodesis, that is the ipsilateral knee 1991). Beyond this the fibre will undergo micro
and the lumbar spine, which the authors hypoth injury. After 121 of rotation overt failure occurs.
'
esized led to the high incidence of LBP in these The disc contributes 35% resistance to torsion; the
individuals (Karol et a12000). Further evidence of remainder (65% ) comes from the posterior ele
the interrelationship of hip muscle control and ments (Bogduk & Twomey 1991). As the distance
lumbar spine function surfaced recently when it between the zygapophyseal joint (ZAJ) and the
was found that hip muscle imbalance was predic axis of rotation is about 30 mm, for every 11 of
tive of the development of LBP in female athletes rotation 0. 5 mm of compression must occur. The
(Nadler et a12001). articular cartilages of the ZAJ are about 2 mm
It has been postulatedthat the sacroiliacjoint(51) thick and articular cartilage is about 75% water, so
also has a role in the control of locomotion and to accommodate 31 of rotation the cartilages must
body posture (Indahl et al 1999). Indahl and col be compressed to about 62% of their resting thick
leagues (1999) found that stimulation of the porcine ness and must lose over half of their water
51 joint capsule elicited activity in the multifidus (Bogduk & Twomey 1991).
muscle, whereas stimulation of the anterior aspect Therefore, the annulus is protected from injury
of thejoint elicited responses in quadratus lumbo by the ZAJ. Impaction of the ZAJ occurs before
rum and gluteus maximus. Interestingly, it has been the fibres of the annulus undergo more than 4%
found that the activity of the gluteus maximus is strain (Bogduk & Twomey 1991). However, it is
shorter in duration in back pain patients during possible that the excessive movement at one lum
trunk flexion and extension than in controls. bar segment occurring with every step an indi
However, activitation patterns in the lumbar vidual takes may cause a permanent elongation
paraspinals and biceps femoris muscles were sim of the annular fibres so these fibres are unable to
ilar in both order and duration in back pain patients provide adequate restraint when a sudden twist
and controls (Leinonen et a12000). ing motion occurs. Alternatively, the excess
To further understand the effect over time of mobility of a particular lumbar segment may
repetitive torsional forces at one or two lumbar affect the recovery from compression of the ZAJ
segments, some relevant anatomy and biome and hence hysteresis. Passive structural changes
chanics must be explored. will affect the neutral zone and hence the stabil
ity of the lumbar segments.
Hysteresis is a phenomenon in which there is a
ANNULAR MECHANICS loss of energy when a structure is subjected to
repetitive load and unload cycles (White &
During twisting movements all points on the Panjabi 1978). Restoration of a collagenous struc
lower surface of one vertebra will move circum ture to its initial length occurs at a lesser rate and
ferentially in the direction of the twist; this has a to a lesser extent than would otherwise be the case
unique effect on the annulus fibrosus. Because of because of the original deformation. When a
the alternating direction of orientation of the col structure is deformed the energy applied to it goes
lagen fibres in the annulus, only those fibres into deforming the structure and straining the
inclined in the direction of the movement will bonds within it. For collagenous tissues, some of
have their points of attachment separated. Those the energy goes into displacing proteoglycans and
inclined in the opposite direction will have their water, and rearranging some of the bonds
points of attachment approximated. Thus, at any between collagen fibres. Once used in this way,
one time the annulus resists twisting motion with the energy is not immediately available to restore
half of its complement of collagen fibres. This is the structure to its original shape. Displaced water,
one of themajor reasons why twisting movements for example, does not remain in the structure and
are the most likely to injure the annulus. The max- exerts a form of back pressure in an attempt to
120 LUMBAR SPINE
MECHANICAL FINDINGS IN
CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN
long multisegmental muscles prevent buckling of symptoms seem to be increased by the very treat
the spine (Bergmark 1989). However, in LBP suf ment that is designed to diminish them. The
ferers, changes in the recruitment pattern of the patient with chronic back and leg pain who can
local muscles of the trunk have been found, com only flex to his k nees is often given a slump
promising intervertebral stability (King et at" 1988; stretch as part of his treatment, but increased pain
Hodges & Richardson 1996; Wilder et aI1996). In indicates an adverse reaction to treatment. This
contrast, a delayed offset of activity when a load patient is then reluctant to have further treatment,
is released from the trunk has been found in the limits his movement even more, becomes stiffer
global muscles such as the oblique abdominals and experiences increases in pain. Key to the suc
and erector spinae, possibly indicating an attempt cess of management of this patient is to unload the
by these superficial muscles to compensate for inflamed soft tissues so that the clinician can
poor deep muscle function (Radebold et al 2000). address the issues of lack of flexibility and poor
It has not yet been established whether the mus dynamic control (McConnell 2000). Unloading the
cle control problem causes the back pain or soft tissue structures, particularly the neural tis
whether the back pain triggers the muscle control sues, will allow the physiotherapist to mobilize
problem (Hodges 2000). the appropriate stiff segments without inadver
The situation may be quite different with chron tently stretching mobile tissues.
ic pain as some of the alteration in motor control The principle of unloading is based on the prem
may be due to the neuroplastic changes that have ise that inflamed soft tissue does not respond well
occurred in the nervous system (Coderre et al to stretch (Gresalmer & McConnell 1998;
1993). Changes may occur because of altered pro McConnell 2000). For example, clinical experience
prioceptive input, either locally, by damage to has demonstrated that if a patient presents with a
receptors and surrounding structures, or central sprained medial collateralligament, applying a val
ly, by changes in the interpretation of propriocep gus stress to the knee wil l aggravate the condition,
tive input, where non-noxious stimuli are whereas a varus stress will decrease the symptoms.
perceived as pain(Flor et aI1997). In this situation, The same principle applies for patients with an
the normal proprioceptive input is either misin inflamed nerve root, producing leg pain. The
terpreted, the appropriate motor response there inflamed tissue needs to be shortened or unloaded.
fore not being elicited or the internal motor Tape can be used to unload (shorten) the inflamed
planning model is faulty (Hodges 2000 ). Motor neural tissue, which will, inturn, decrease the pain.
performance may also be affected by changes in Initially the buttock is unloaded, which should
attentional demands, whereby people with chron decrease the proximal symptoms but may increase
ic pain perform poorly in task s demanding atten the distal symptoms (see Fig. 9. 5A). Next a diago
tion (Kewman et al 1991; Eccleston 1994) and are nal strip of tape is placed mid-thigh over the appro
less able to be focus away from pain (Dufton 1989). priate dermatome (posterior thigh for 51; lateral
Therefore, there is a need to decrease the pain aspect of the thigh for L5 and so forth; see Fig. 9. 5B).
input from the periphery so that treatment does The soft tissues are lifted up towards the buttock .
not aggravate the condition. The direction of the tape is dependent on symptom
response. If there is a local increase in symptoms
then the direction of the diagonal should be
UNLOADING PAINFUL STRUCTURES reversed. Another diagonal piece of tape is com
menced mid calf/shin (following the dermatome),
The concept of minimizing the aggravation of again lifting the skin towards the buttock (see Fig.
inflamed tissue is certainly central to all interven 9. 5C). The patient should experience an immediate
tions in manual therapy. Therapists have a num 50% decrease in symptoms. The tape is k ept on for
ber of weapons in their armoury to manage pain a week before it is renewed and usually only needs
and reduce inflammation. It is in the chronic state two or three applications before the symptoms
that pain is more diffcult to settle and sometimes have settled sufficiently.
122 LUMBAR SPINE
TREATMENT
Figure 9.7 Stabilizing an unstable lumbar segment. Figure 9.8 Training posterior gluteus medius. Knee slightly
flexed, weight back through the heel, hips and foot facing
the front, external rotation of the standing IRg thigh.
training is very specific to limb position, joint angle The inflamed soft tissue should be unloaded so
and velocity, type and force of contraction [see the symptoms are not increased when there is an
Herbert (1993) and Sale & MacDougall (1981) for attempt, in treatment, to gain range. Flexibility
excellent reviews on specificity of training], so for needs to be gained in the anterior hip structures
training to be effective, a return to functional posi and thoracic spine, while stability is required at
tions should occur as soon as possible. the mobile lumbar segment/s and pelvis. There is
also a need, in the management of chronic pain
problems in general, for therapists to review
CONCLUSION patients every 6 or 12 months to ensure patients
still know how to manage their symptoms, as
Management of chronic low back and leg pain chronic problems are never cured, only managed.
requires a multifactorial approach. The therapist If patients are empowered to manage their own
needs to examine the way the patient walks so the symptoms, the burden of chronic musculoskele
effect of any uneven loading through the lower tal problems on the health-care system could pos
extremity on the lumbar spine can be observed. sibly be reduced.
REFERENCES
Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P 1999 Personal risk Basmajian J, De Luca C 1985 Muscles Alive. 5th edn.
factors for first time LBP. Spine 24(23): 2497-250 5 Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Andersson G B 1999 Epidemiological features o f chronic Bergmark A 1989 Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in
low back pain. Lancet 14, 354(9178): 581-585 mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica
60(Suppl 230): 1-54
LUMBAR SPINE: CHRONIC BACK AND LEG PAIN 125
Bockrath K, Wooden C, Worrell T, Ingersoll C, Farr J 1993 Flor H, Braun, C, Elbert T, Birbaumer N 1997 Extensive
Effects of patella taping on patella position and reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic
perceived pain. Medicine and Science in Sports and back pain patients. Neuroscience Letters 224(1): 5--8
Exercise 25(9): 989-992 Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL 1991 An overview of the
Bogduk N, Twomey L 1991 Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar incidences and costs of LBP. Orthopaedic Clinics of
Spine. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh North America 22(2): 263-271
Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW 1991 Identifying patients at Garnett R, Stephens JA 1981 Changes in recruitment
risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous
The Vermont Rehabilitation Engineering Center stimulation in man. Journal of Physiology 311: 463-473
predictive model. Spine 16(6): 605-607 Gilleard W, McConnell J, Parsons D 1998 T he effect of
Cerny K 1995 Vastus medialis oblique/vastus lateralis patellar taping on the onset of vastus medialis obliquus
muscle activity ratios for selected exercises in persons and vastus lateralis muscle activity in persons with
with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Physical patellofemoral pain. Physical Therapy 78(1): 25-32
Therapy 75(8): 672-683 Gresalmer R, McConnell J 1998 The Patella: A Team
Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Khachatryan A 1997 Stabilizing Approach. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD
function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a Hadjistavropoulos HD, LaChapelle DL 2000 Extent and
neutral spine posture. Spine 22(19): 2207-2212 nature of anxiety experienced during physical
Coderre TJ, Katz J, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R 1993 examination of chronic LBP. Behavioural Research
Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological Therapy 38(1): 13-29
pain: Review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain Hadjipavlou AG, Simmons JW, Yang JP, Bi LX, Ansari GA,
52(3): 259-285 Kaphalia BS, Simmons DJ, Nicodemus CL, Necessary
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL 2001a Functional stability JT, Lane R, Esch 0 1998 Torsional injury resulting in disc
retraining: Principles and strategies for managing degeneration: I. An in vivo rabbit model. Journal of
mechanical dysfunction. Manual Therapy 6(1): 3-14 Spinal Disorders 11(4): 312-317
Comerford MJ and Mottram SL 2001b Movement and Hall T, Zusman M, Elvey R 1995 Manually Detected
stability dysfunction - contemporary developments. Impediments During the Straight Leg Raise Test.
Manual Therapy 6(1): 15-26 Proceedings 9th Biennial Conference of the Manipulative
Conway A, Malone T, Conway P 1992 Patellar alignment/ Physiotherapists Association of Australia, Gold Coast,
tracking alteration: Effect on force output and perceived pp 48-53
pain. Isokinetics and Exercise Science 2(1): 9-17. Hamilton C, Richardson C (1998) Active control of the
Cowan SM, Bennell KL, Crossley KM, Hodges PW, neutral lumbopelvic posture: A comparison of LBP and
McConnell J 2001 Physiotherapy treatment changes non LBP subjects. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Tilsher H,
motor control of the vastii in patellofemoral pain Dorman T, Snijders C (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd
syndrome (PFPS): A randomised, double-blind, placebo Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back and
controlled trial. Medicine and Science in Sports and Pelvic Pain, Vienna, Austria
Exercise 33(5): S89 Handfield T, Kramer J 2000 Effect of McConnell taping on
Cushnaghan J, McCarthy R, Dieppe P 1994 The effect of perceived pain and knee extensor torques during
taping the patella on pain in the osteoarthritic patient. isokinetic exercise performed by patients with
British Medical Journal 308(6931): 753-755 patellofemoral pain syndrome. Physiotherapy Canada,
Dananberg H 1997 Lower back pain as a gait related Winter: 39-44
repetitive motion injury. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Herbert R 1993 Human strength adaptations - implications
Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R (eds) Movement and for therapy. In: Crosbie J, McConnell J (eds) Key Issues
Stability & Low Back Pain - The Essential Role of the in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy. Butterworth
Pelvis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Heinemann, Oxford
Dufton BD 1989 Cognitive failure and chronic pain. Hides JA, Jull GA, Richardson CA 1996 Multifidus muscle
International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 19(3): recovery is not spontaneous after resolution of acute
291-297 first episode low back pain. Spine 21(23) 2763-2769
Dye S 1996 The knee as a biologic transmission with an Hodges PW 2000 The role of the motor system in spinal
envelope of function: A theory. Clinical Orthopaedics pain: Implications for rehabilitation of the athlete
(325):10-18 following lower back pain. Journal of Science and
Dye S 1999 Invited commentary. Journal Orthopaedic Medicine in Sport; 3(3): 243-253
Sports Physical Therapy 29(7): 386-387 Hodges PW Richardson CA 1996 Inefficient muscular
Eccleston C 1994 Chronic pain and attention: A cognitive stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with LBP. A
approach. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 33(Part motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis.
4): 535-547 Spine 15; 21(22): 2640-2650
Farfan HF, Cossette JW, Robertson GH, Wells RV, Kraus H Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ, Lousberg R, Zilvold
1970 The effects of torsion on lumbar intervertebral G 1999 Distribution of psychological aspects in
joints: The role of torsion in the production of disc subgroups of chronic LBP patients divided on the score
degeneration. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 52A: of physical performance. International Journal of
468-497 Rehabilitation Research 22(4): 261-268
Feuerstein M, Beattie P, 1995 Biobehavioral factors Indahl A, Kaigle AM, Reikeras 0, Holm SH 1999 Sacroiliac
affecting pain and disability in LBP: Mechanisms and joint involvement in activation of the porcine spinal and
assessment. Physical Therapy 75(4): 267-280 gluteal musculature. Journal of Spinal Disorders 12(4):
325-330
126 LUMBAR SPINE
Jenner JR, Stephens JA 1982 Cutaneous reflex responses A, Perry J 1997 The effects of patellar taping on stride
and their central nervous system pathways studied in characteristics and joint motion in subjects with
man. Journal of Physiology 333: 405-419 patellofemoral pain. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
Kader 0, Wardlaw 0, Smith F 2000 Correlation between Physical Therapy 26(6): 286-291
MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscle and leg Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Patel TC 2000.
pain. Clinical Radiology 55(2): 145-149 Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in
Karol LA, Halliday SE, Gourineni P 2000 Gait and function healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back
after intra-articular arthrodesis of the hip in adolescents. pain. Spine 25(8): 947-954
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82(4): 561-569 Richardson CA, Jull GA, Hodges PW, Hides JA 1999
Kelsey JL, Githens PB, White AA 1984 An epidemiological Therapeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilisation
study of lifting and twisting on the job and the risk for in LBP: Scientific Basis and Clinical Approach. Churchill
acute prolapsed lumbar intevertebral disc. Journal of Livingstone, Edinburgh
Orthopaedic Research 2: 61-66 Richardson C, Jull G, Wohlfahrt 0 1991 Ballistic Exercise:
Kendall NA 1999 Psychosocial approaches to the Can it Undermine the Protective Stability Role of the
prevention of chronic pain: The low back paradigm. Lumbar Musculature. Proceedings MPAA 7th Biennial
Baillieres Best Practice Research Clinical Rheumatology Conference, NSW, Australia
13(3): 545-554 Robbins S, Waked E, Rappel R 1995 Ankle taping improves
Kewman DG, Vaishampayan N, Zald 0, Han B 1991 proprioception before and after exercise in young men.
Cognitive impairment in musculoskeletal pain patients. British Journal of Sports Medicine 29(4): 242-247
International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 21 (3): Sahrmann S 2002 Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement
253-262 Impairment Syndromes. Mosby, St Louis
King JC, Lehmkuhl DL, French J, Dimitrijevic M 1988 Sale 0 1987 Influence of exercise and training on motor unit
Dynamic postural reflexes: Comparison in normal activation. Exercise & Sports Science Review 5: 95-151
subjects and patients with chronic LBP. Current Sale 0, MacDougall 0 1981 Specificity of strength training:
Concepts in Rehabilitation Medicine 4: 7-11 A review for coach & athlete. Canadian Journal of
Larsen B, Andreasen E, Urfer A, Mickleson MR, Newhouse Applied Sports Sciences 6(2): 87-92
KE 1995 Patellar taping: A radiographic examination of Saunders J, Inman V, Eberhart H 1953 The major
the medial glide technique. American Journal of Sports determinants in normal and pathological gait. Journal of
Medicine 23: 465-471 Bone and Joint Surgery 35A: 543-558
Leinonen V, Kankaanpaa M, Airaksinen 0, Hanninen 0 2000 Schache AG, Bennell KL, Blanch PO, Wrigley TV 1999 The
Back and hip extensor activities during trunk flexion/ coordinated movement of the lumbo-pelvic hip complex
extension: Effects of low back pain and rehabilitation. during running: A literature review Gait Posture 10(1):
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81(1): 30-47
32-37 Tobin S, Robinson G 2000 The effect of McConnell's vastus
Lundberg U 1999 Stress responses in low-status jobs and lateralis inhibition taping technique on vastus lateralis
their relationship to health risks: Musculoskeletal and vastus medialis activity. Physiotherapy 86(1):
disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 174-183
896: 162-172 Verhagen EA, van Mechelen W, de Vente W 2000 The effect
McConnell J 2000 A novel approach to pain relief pre of preventive measures on the incidence of ankle
therapeutic exercise. Journal of Science and Medicine in sprains. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 10(4):
Sport 3(3): 325-334 291-296
Nadler SF, Malanga GA, Feinberg JH, Prybicien M, Stitik TP, Waddell G 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new
DePrince M 2001 Relationship between hip muscle clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine
imbalance and occurrence of LBP in collegiate athletes: 12(7): 632-644
A prospective study. American Journal of Physical White A, Panjabi M 1978 Clinical Biomechanics of the
Medicine and Rehabilitation; 80(8): 572-577 Spine. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA
Novacheck TF 1997 The biomechanics of running and Wheeler A 1995 Diagnosis and management of LBP and
sprinting. In: Guten GN (ed) Running Injuries. WB sciatica. American Family Physician 52(5): 133-141
Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 4-19 Wilder DG, Aleksiev AR, Magnusson ML, Pope MH, Spratt
O'Sullivan PB 2000 Lumbar segmental 'instability': Clinical KF, Goel VK 1996 Muscular response to sudden load. A
presentation and specific stabilizing exercise tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation. Spine 21(22):
management. Manual Therapy 5(1): 2-12 2628-2639
Panjabi M 1992a The stabilising system of the spine. Part I. Williams P, Warwick R 1980. Gray's Anatomy, 36th edn.
Journal of Spinal Disorders 5(4): 383-389 Churchill Livingstone, London
Panjabi M 1992b The stabilising system of the spine. Part I. Zusman M 1998 Structure-oriented beliefs and disability
Journal of Spinal Disorders 5(4): 390-397 due to back pain. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
Perry J 1992 Gait Analysis. McGraw-Hili, New York 44: 13-20
Powers C, Landel R, Sosnick T, Kirby J, Mengel K, Cheney
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 127
INTRODUCTION
ultrasound imaging allows rapid evaluation of muscles and the lumbar multifidus (Stokes &
morphology and pathomorphological changes in Young 1986; Loo & Stokes 1990; Martinson &
a number of organs and tissues. It is used exten Stokes 1991; Hides et a1 1992, 1994, 1995a, 1996;
sively in gynaecology and obstetrics (where it has Sipila & Suominen 1993). Real-time ultrasound
been of special value due to the fact that it does imaging has been used for observation of muscle
not involve exposure to ionizing radiation), inter contraction in research on the pelvic floor (Berstein
nal medicine, surgery, orthopaedics, sports med et a11991; Wijma et a11991) and abdominal mus
icine, neurology and paediatrics. cle contraction both under functional load (Kogut
A review of the applications of ultrasonogra et al 1990) and during a submaximal Valsalva
phy in medicine is beyond the scope of this arti manoeuvre (Cresswell et al 1992). It has been
cle. The usefulness of ultrasonography for described for feedback in rehabilitation of the lwn
evaluation of the musculoskeletal system has been bar multifidus (Hides et a11995b, 1996; Stokes et
shown (Fornage & Rifkin 1988; Harcke et a11988; a11997) and our current work also involves assess
Kaplan et al 1990; Laine & Peltokallio 1991; van ment and rehabilitation of the transversus abdo
Holsbeeck & Introcaso 1992; Chhem et aI1994). minis. The latter highlights a potentially important
One example of the use of ultrasound imaging in application for physiotherapy research and prac
this field is diagnosis of muscle lesions common tice, i.e. imaging the action of deep muscles.
ly seen in sports medicine (partial and complete
muscle tears and haematomas). Ultrasound imag
ing has been used to determine the presence, loca BASIC PRINCIPLES AND
tion and severity of anatomic damage in these INSTRUMENTATION
lesions (Laine & Peltokallio 1991; Chhem et al
1994). Similarly, joints, ligaments and bursaes at Ultrasound imaging involves sending short puls
the knee, shoulder and ankle joints have been es of ultrasound into the body and using reflec
examined for diagnostic purposes (Laine & tions received from tissue interfaces to produce
Peltokallio 1991; van Holsbeeck & Strouse 1993). images of internal structures. Pulsed ultrasound
However, tendons are the most frequently stud is described by frequency, propagation speed,
ied structures in musculoskeletal ultrasound to intensity, attenuation and pulse length (Kremkau
identify partial or complete tears or post-trawnatic 1983). Frequencies from 1 to 10 MHz are used. The
tenosynovitis (Fornage & Rifkin 1988). The most lower frequencies are used when greater depths
commonly evaluated tendons are the rotator cuff, of imaging are required and the higher frequen
achilles tendon and patellar tendon (Chhem et al cies for visualizing more superficial structures.
1994). The reason that these techniques are so use As sound encounters boundaries between dif
ful is because dynamic studies (observing move ferent tissues, it can be reflected and scattered. The
ment of tendons) can be performed. It is in fact distance from the transducer to the tissues caus
this ability to image moving structures that is ing scattering and reflection is determined by trav
attractive to physiotherapists because real-time el time (Kremkau 1983). Similar to therapeutic
ultrasound can also be used as a feedback tool ultrasound, transducers used in ultrasound imag
during muscle contraction. ing convert electrical voltages into ultrasound
Ultrasound imaging has previously had two (and vice versa) by piezo-electricity. For ultra
main applications in rehabilitation: measurement sound imaging, the same transducer is used to
of muscle size and more recently, imaging of mus both send pulses and receive echoes reflected back
cle movement. Measurement of muscle size is pos to it. To receive echoes, the transducer must be
sible as ultrasound imaging allows generation of positioned so that the sound beam is perpendicu
measurements in cross-section, thus providing a lar to the tissue interface being imaged (Saunders
method of direct assessment of muscle atrophy & James 1985).
and hypertrophy. Various muscles have been Imaging systems consist of a pulser, transduc
measured including quadriceps, anterior tibial er, receiver, memory and display (Kremkau 1983).
USE OF REAL-TIME ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR FEEDBACK IN REHABILITATION 129
domized clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy not very useful for providing feedback from the
of specific rehabilitation that focuses on co-activa multifidus due to its depth and the cross-talk from
tion of these deep muscles (Hides et al 1996; the adjacent muscles. It can be used to provide
O'Sullivan et aI1997). Evidence suggests that it is feedback and to teach relaxation of the thoracic
very important that these deep muscles are target components of the erector spinae muscles if they
ed specifically in rehabilitation, i.e. that their action are overactive.
is ensured separately from other trunk muscles While these methods are used clinically with
(Hodges & Richardson 1997). In the case of the much success, there is the drawback that the mus
multifidus, research has shown that the effect on cles are deep and, therefore, assessment strategies
the muscle following injury is rapid and very spe are to some extent indirect. Real-time ultrasound
cific to the injured vertebral segment (Hides et al imaging is potentially an advantageous modality
1994). The approach to exercise therapy needs to because it allows immediate visualization of con
be very precise because the unaffected parts of the traction of the deep muscles such as the transver
multifidus and other muscles, such as the thoracic sus abdominis and the multifidus. Furthermore it
components of the erector spinae, will be more eas is non-invasive and could be useful for both
ily activated when rehabilitation is attempted. In assessment and facilitation of these muscles.
the case of the transversus abdominis, it is appar For the transversus abdominis muscle, real
ent that if separate control of the muscle is lost, a time ultrasound imaging allows observation of the
generalized activation of more superficial abdom pattern of activation of the abdominal muscles
inal muscles will ensue. Care and precision with during performance of the abdominal drawing-in
facilitation is needed. action. The corset-like action can be observed as
Currently, transversus abdominis is tested in can unwanted contraction of the more superficial
the clinical situation through assessment of its muscles. Each side can be examined separately for
action of drawing in the abdominal wall symmetry of contraction. For facilitation of the
(Richardson & Jull 1995; Richardson et al 1998). subtle corset-like action of transversus abdominis
This action is performed principally by the trans in relative isolation, visual verification that the cor
versus abdominis (Lacote et al 1987) and can be rect facilitation strategy has been used by the
described as a corset-like action. An indirect physiotherapist and the correct activation has been
method of quantification of the action presently achieved by the patient is of benefit to patient and
used is with use of the pressure biofeedback unit
and testing in the prone position. If the patient is
unable to do the action, the attempt is analysed by
the physiotherapist through observation of the
abdominal wall, palpation of the lower abdomi
nal quadrant for a deep tensioning of muscle
fibres and, if the muscles such as obliquus abdo
minis externus are overactive, this is monitored by
surface electromyograph (EMG). The clinical
assessment of multifidus is palpation of muscle
size and consistency of activation. Comparisons
can be made between sides and between vertebral
levels. To assess multifidus activation in line with
its stability role, the segmental multifidus is pal
pated as the patient attempts a slow, gentle and
subtle isometric contraction. Considerable clinical Figure 10.3 Patient positioned in supine lying observing
the pattern of activation of the muscles of the
skill is required to interpret the different strategies
anterolateral abdominal wall in transverse section as they
adopted by LBP patients who have difficulty acti attempt to isolate the subtle drawing in action of the
vating the multifidus in this way. Surface EMG is transversus abdominis muscle.
USE OF REAL-TIME ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR FEEDBACK IN REHABILITATION 131
compared with obstetricians who are performing levels of the equipment and use minimal expo
invasive procedures, such as amniocentesis and sure levels possible to provide adequate images
chorionic villus sampling. (Preston 1991).
Use of ultrasound for feedback may raise some Real-time ultrasound imaging is a modality that
issues relating to safety, as this application is has great potential to be very useful in rehabili
slightly different from many other assessments tation. Its uses in deep muscle assessment and
used in medicine. For example, obstetric imaging facilitation are yet to be fully explored and real
would not commonly be performed once or pos ized. These techniques have been successfully
sibly twice per week for consecutive weeks, applied to the abdominal and multifidus muscles
which is how this application might be used in in LBP patients for assessment and feedback, and
rehabilitation. Ultrasound imaging is thought to the results of integration of this modality with
be a safe modality and there are no known other assessment techniques and good clinical
adverse effects of ultrasound imaging. However, skills are very encouraging. For integration into
as ultrasound is a form of energy, there is a risk mainstream physiotherapy practice, the main
(however small) that a biological effect could be emphasis must be on ultrasound imaging being
produced on tissue (Docker & Duck 1991; an adjunct to assessment and treatment, with
Kremkau 1991; Preston 1991). As physiothera good clinical skills remaining of paramount
pists, we are familiar with the potential of thera importance. Real-time ultrasound imaging has
peutic ultrasound (at much higher intensities) to the potential to be of tremendous benefit to the
induce thermal effects and cavitation caused by physiotherapy profession. The challenge for our
high acoustic pressures (Preston 1991), but dam profession is to introduce and implement it in
age of tissues has not been documented with such a manner that it is used judiciously and
diagnostic imaging. The output (intensity or appropriately, to gain the credibility and accept
acoustic power) is usually preset on ultrasound ance that it deserves.
imaging equipment and not adjustable. When
output is adjustable, safety principles would sug
Acknowledgements
gest that the lowest available setting, which pro
vides an adequate image, be selected. Guidelines We wish to thank Dr D.H. Cooper for his contin
for minimizing risk during clinical application of ued assistance and guidance with ultrasound
ultrasound imaging have been provided (Docker imaging and for reading the manuscript and pro
& Duck 1991), with one of the main points being viding useful feedback, and Mr Quentin Scott for
that the operator should be aware of the output assistance with illustrations and feedback.
REFERENCES
Berstein I, Juul N, Gronvall S, Bonde B, Klarskov P 1991 Fish P 1990 PhYSics and Instrumentation of Diagnostic
Pelvic floor muscle thickness measured by perineal Medical Ultrasound. Wiley and Sons, London
ultrasonography. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Fornage BD, Rifkin MD 1988 Ultrasound examination of
Nephrology Supplementum 137: 131-133 tendons. Radiologic Clinics of North America 22: 87-107
Chhem RK, Kaplan PA, Dussault RG 1994 Ultrasonography Gentile AM 1972 A working model of skill acquisition with
of the musculoskeletal system. Radiologic Clinics of application to teaching. Quest 17: 3-23
North America 32(2): 275-289 Harcke HT, Grissom LE, Finkelstein MS 1988 Evaluation of
Cresswell AG, Grundstrom A, Thorstensson A 1992 the musculoskeletal system with sonography. American
Observations on intrabdominal pressure and patterns of Journal of Roentgenology 150: 1253-1261
abdominal intramuscular activity in man. Acta Hides JA, Cooper DH, Stokes MJ 1992 Diagnostic
Physiologica Scandinavica 144: 409-418 ultrasound imaging for measurement of the lumbar
Docker MF, Duck FA 1991 The Safe Use of Diagnostic multifidus muscle in normal young adults.
Ultrasound. British Institute of Radiology, London Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 8: 19-26
USE OF REAL-TIME ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR FEEDBACK IN REHABILITATION 135
Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA 1995a Magnetic Strength. Proceedings of the Third International
resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the lumbar Physiotherapy Congress, Hong Kong, pp 655-660
multifidus muscle: Comparison of two different Martinson H, Stokes MJ 1991 Measurement of anterior
modalities. Spine 20: 54-58 tibial muscle size using real-time ultrasound imaging.
Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA, Davies SE 1995b European Journal of Applied Physiology 63: 250-254
Ultrasound imaging in rehabilitation. Australian Journal Newell KM 1976 Knowledge of results and motor learning.
of Physiotherapy 41: 187-193 Exercises and Sports Sciences Reviews 4: 195-228
Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA 1996 Multifidus muscle O'Sullivan PB, Twomey LT Allison GT 1997 Evaluation of
recovery is not automatic following resolution of acute specific stabilising exercises in the treatment of chronic
first episode low back pain. Spine 21: 2763-2769 low back pain with radiological diagnosis of
Hides JA, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Jull GA, Cooper DH 1994 spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine 22(24):
Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral 2959-2967
to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back Preston RC 1991 Output Measurements for Diagnostic
pain. Spine 19(2): 165-172 Ultrasound. Springer, London
Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1996 Inefficient muscular Richardson CA, Jull GA 1995 Muscle control-pain control.
stabilisation of the lumbar spine associated with low What exercises would you prescribe? Manual Therapy 1:
back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus 2-10
abdominis. Spine 21: 2640-2650 Richardson CA, Jull GA, Hodges PW, Hides JA 1998
Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1997 Feedforward contraction Therapeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilisation
of transversus abdominis is not influenced by the in Low Back Pain, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
direction of arm movement. Experimental Brain Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW 1991 Diagnostic
Research, 114: 362-370. Ultrasound, Mosby, London
Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1998 Delayed postural Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB 1984 Knowledge of
contraction of transversus abdominis in low back pain results and motor learning: A review and critical
associated with movement of the lower limbs. Journal of appraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95(3): 355-386
Spinal Disorders 11 (1): 46-56 Saunders RC, James AE 1985 The Principles and Practice
Hodges PW, Richardson CA, Jull GA 1996 Evaluation of the of Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3rd
relationship between the findings of a laboratory and edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk pp 1-14
clinical test of transversus abdominis function. Schmidt RA 1988 Motor Control and Learning, 2nd edn.
Physiotherapy Research International 1: 30-40 Human Kinetics, Illinois
Kaplan PA, Matamoros A, Anderson JC 1990 Sonography Sipila S, Suominen H 1993 Muscle ultrasonography and
of the musculoskeletal system. American Journal of computed tomography in elderly trained and untrained
Roentgenology 155: 237-245 women. Muscle and Nerve 16: 294-300
Kogut BM, Sanigurskii GI, Maneshin VN 1990 Possibilities of Stokes MJ, Hides JA, Nassiri OK 1997 Musculoskeletal
using ultrasonography for intravital study of topographic ultrasound imaging: Diagnostic and treatment aid in
anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall in humans. rehabilitation. Physical Therapy Reviews 2(2): 73-92
Arkhiv Anatomii Gistologii Embriologii 99: 55-59 Stokes MJ, Young A 1986 Measurement of quadriceps
Kremkau FW 1983 Ultrasound instrumentation: physical cross-sectional area by ultrasonography: a description
principles. In: Callen PW (ed) Ultrasonography in of the technique and its application in physiotherapy.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology. WB Saunders, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2: 31-36
Philadelphia, pp 313-324 van Holsbeeck M, Strouse PJ 1993 Sonography of the
Kremkau FW 1991 Biological Effects and Safety. In: shoulder: Evaluation of the subacromial-subdeltoid
Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW (eds) bursa. American Journal of Roentgenology 160(3):
Diagnostic Ultrasound. London, Mosby, pp 19-29 561-564
Lacote M, Clevalier AM, Miranda A, Bleton JP, Stevenin P van Holsbeeck M, Introcaso JH 1992 Musculoskeletal
1987 Clinical Evaluation of Muscle Function. Churchill ultrasonography. Radiology Clinics of North America
Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 290-293 30(5): 907-925
Laine HR, Peltokallio P 1991 Ultrasonographic possibilities Wijma J, Tinga OJ, Visser GH 1991 Perineal
and findings in most common sports injuries. Annales ultrasonography in women with stress incontinence and
Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae 80(2): 127-133 controls: The role of the pelvic floor muscles.
Loo A, Stokes MJ 1990 Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanning for Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 32: 176-179
Clinical Estimation of Quadriceps Size and Estimation of
136 LUMBAR SPINE
USE OF REAL-TIME ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR FEEDBACK IN REHABILITATION 137
medical engineers to develop prototypic models of terns of multifidus atrophy and activation in
deep muscle function in asymptomatic and chron chronic LBP patients and surgical patients.
ic low back pain patients. One of the limitations of Ultrasound imaging appears to be very useful
real-time ultrasound imaging is the limited field of in both research and clinical practice. It is cur
view. MRI is being used to observe the whole rently taught at the University of Queensland at
'muscular corset', and the results are being com both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. My
pared with those from real-time ultrasound imag opinion is that its applications will be further
ing. As in previous investigations (Hides et al developed and utilized elsewhere in the body. The
1995), MRI is still regarded as the gold standard ability to image moving structures is still one of
for imaging muscles, with superior resolution and the main advantages for our profession. More
a wider field of view. In other projects, real-time research is required in the future for its potential
ultrasound imaging is being used to look at pat- to be maximized.
REFERENCES
Buyruk HM, Stan HJ, Snijders CJ, Lamens JS, Holland Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, Damen L, Pas MS,
W P, Stinen TH 1999 Measurement of sacroiliac joint Storm J 2001 The relationship between the transversely
stiffness in peripartum pelvic pain patients with oriented abdominal muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics
Doppler imaging of vibrations (DIV). European Journal and low back pain. Spine 27(4): 399-405
of Obstetrics, Gynecologym, and Reproductive Snijders CJ, Ribbers MTLM, Bakker JV de, Steockart R,
Biology 83: 159-163 Stam HJ 1998 EMG recordings of abdominal and back
Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA 1995 MRI and muscles in various standing postures: Validations of a
ultrasonography of the lumbar multifudus muscle. biomechanical model on sacroiliac jOint stability. Journal
Spine 20: 54-58 of Electromyography and Kinesiology 8: 205-214
Hodges PW, Pengel LHM, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC 2003 Van K, Hides J, Richardson CA 2002 Real-time ultrasound
Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging enhances learning of an isometric multifidus
imaging. Muscle and Nerve. (in press) contraction (submitted for publication)
SECTION 4
Sacroiliac Joint
SECTION CONTENTS
Introduction 141
Sacroiliac dysfunction in
Anatomy/biomechanics of the
sacroiliac joint 143
Treatment 148
L. E. DeMann Jr
Manhattan Chiropractic Center, New York, USA
INTRODUCTION
Table 11.1 Percentage of low back injuries to total dance injuries in different studies.
Table 11.2 Common causes of low back pain in there are many different styles of dance. Generally,
dancers.
it has not been shown that one particular type of
• Sacroiliac dysfunction dance is more likely to lead to injury than anoth
• Lumbar derangements er. There are, however, differences in distribution
• Disc syndromes of injuries to various regions of the body. Each sys
• Facet syndromes
• Stress fracture
tem of dance, each technique, and each practice
• Spondylosis and performance schedule will have a different
• Muscular syndromes effect on the biomechanics of the body, translating
- Piriformis into a slightly different usage factor, which, in
- Psoas
- Gluteus maximus
tum, may lead to a slightly different injury pro
- Quadratus lumborum file. For the purposes of this article the focus will
- Erector spinae be specifically the SI joint and its relationship to
- Hamstrings classical dance - ballet.
Dysfunction of the SI joint has been extensive
Table 11.3 Less common causes of low back pain in ly reported as a major cause of low back pain since
dancers. the early part of this century (Brooke 1924; Cox
1927). It was not until the late 1930s that interest
Spondylolisthesis
•
in the SI joint diminished, as focus shifted towards
• Scoliosis
• Osteoarthritis
the lumbar disc and its role in back pain. Interest
• Periostitis (due to direct pressure over the dorsal aspect in the SI joint resurfaced again in the 1970s and
of the spinous process from working with the back
continues today (Davis & Lentle 1978; Kirkaldy
against a hard floor surface)
• Compensatory responses to other injured areas (i.e. hip, Willis & Hill 1979).
knee, foot and ankle The role that the SI joint plays in its relationship
to dance is a vital one, as the dynamics of dance are
intimately involved with the biomechanics of the
most common cause of low back pain in dancers spine and pelvis. A great many of the movements
(Marshall 1995). To date there has been no study of dance, concerned with the lower extremity as
that has categorized the specific types of spinal well as the torso, are made possible by the muscles
problems nor any study quantifying these prob of the back and pelvis (Micheli 1983; Don Tigny
lems. A variation in the interpretation of the types 1985; Keller & West 1995; Laws 1995). Stabilization
of spinal problems may exist because of the wide of almost any dance posture will involve the mus
variety and styles of dance and the different phys cles and ligaments of the spine. Fundamental to
iological influences that these varying styles of dance is turnout, i.e. extreme external rotation of
dance place on the body. The physiological the hip, which is the foundation of ballet and from
demands of modem dance are different to those of which all steps and all movements are performed
classical ballet and those of Broadway dancing (Warren 1989). Combined with the extreme range
(musical theatre) are different to those of ballet and of hip extension (arabesque), the rapid movement
modem dance. Even within the context of ballet of the leg in all directions, the jumps, leaps, twist-
SACROILIAC DYSFUNCTION IN DANCERS WITH LOW BACK PAIN 143
Figure 11.1 Arabesque. Integral to ballet is the Figure 11.2 Arabesque penchee. This is similar to a
arabesque where one leg is held in extension. Notice that straight arabesque except for being performed while
both legs are in turnout position, the hip and leg being bending forward. A great deal of strength is needed to
fully externally rotated. Turnout is fundamental to ballet sustain these balletic positions.
and is a part of all ballet positions.
144 SACROILIAC JOINT
DIAGNOSIS
sis of the mechanisms specific to dance and the SI joint dysfunction can exist by itself; howev
involvement of the anatomy and its biomechanical er, it is more commonly seen in conjunction with
applications (Soh! & Bowling 1990; Hald 1992). some other structural or mechanical deficit,
and/or with some type of soft tissue muscular
Table 11.4 Diagnostic tests for sacroiliac dysfunction. involvement (Greenman 1989). SI joint dysfunc
tion is usually unilateral, with no preference or
1. Static palpation of SI joint - posterior SI ligament dominance for either side (Alderink 1991; Fortin
The SI ligament is one of the main stabilizing compo
et aI1992). It can be acute or chronic.
nents of the SI joint. If there is any dysfunction of this
joint, this ligament will exhibit some degree of distress, X-ray analysis is usually negative, with no sig
usually pinpoint tenderness along the course of this nificant findings (Schuchman & Cannon 1986).
ligament.
Even if osteoarthritis is seen affecting the iliac por
2. Kinetic palpation of SI joint with leg extension tion of the SI joint, as stated earlier, it may be of no
With the patient prone the palms of hands are gently clinical significance.
placed over each SI joint. The patient is asked to extend
In a pure SI dysfunction there are no neurolog
each leg one at a time, while gentle pressure is applied
downward with both hands. The patient with an SI joint ical findings, no loss or diminution of reflexes, no
dysfunction will either exhibit discomfort on extension of muscle weakness, or any sensory loss (Le Blanc
one leg or show compensatory signs by either trying to
1992). However, in combination with other back
raise the pelvis off the table on the involved side, or
increasing rotation/turnout of the extended leg. problems such as disc or piriformis involvement,
neurological symptoms may exist.
3. Gillet standing flexion test
Seven of the more common diagnostic tests
With the patient standing, place the thumb of the right
hand over the second sacral tubercle and the thumb of used to isolate SI dysfunction are listed in Table
the left hand over the PSIS. Instruct the patient to flex 11.4. One or more of these tests may be positive
the left hip and knee to 90°. In the normal joint the
while others may not be. There is also a great deal
thumb of the left hand will move caudad. In the dysfunc
tional joint the thumb will move cephalad, thus evaluat of tester subjectivity involved with these tests
ing the movement dynamics of the SI joint. (Blower & Griffin 1984; Potter & Rothstein 1985;
Cummings & Crowell 1988; Drefuss et al 1994;
4. Supine distraction/iliac gapping test
The patient lies supine, and the heels of the hands are Laslett & Williams 1994).
placed on the ASIS of the ilium. Pressure is applied Pain patterns run the spectrum of low back
downward and laterally outward. The arms are crossed
to increase the lateral component of force applied, cre
pain, ranging from localized pain over the SI joint,
ating strain on the 81 ligaments. Discomfort is felt in the to pain across the low back, to pain radiating into
affected joint. the buttock and thigh (BeaI1989; Fortin et aI1992).
The dancer might complain of pain or limitation
5. Supine single knee to chest torsion test (Gaenslen's Test)
With the patient supine, the knee on the affected side is of their arabesque (full leg extension), noticing
drawn up to the chest. The opposite hip and leg are that one side is higher than the other; to achieve
kept fully extended. This manoeuvre produces rotatory
the desired height they may have to compensate
stress and can increase pain in the presence of SI dys
function. by rotating, turning out, or 'opening up' the pelvis
more on the affected side. Since the SI joint
6. SI compression test
absorbs concussion forces, jumping may become
With the patient lying on their side, downward pressure
applied on the lateral aspect of the pelvis can produce difficult, especially when a dancer lands on the leg
pain in the region of the affected SI joint. of the affected side.
7. Single leg stand
Have the patient stand on the leg in the neutral position
(not in turnout), with the opposite leg flexed 90° at the CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
hip and knee. The patient may stabilize him/herself by
lightly holding on to a stationary object. Have the
patient remain in this position for 30-60 seconds. The Problems affecting the SI joint can be caused by a
standing leg will increase the weight-bearing properties single traumatic incident, overuse factors arising
of the affected SI joint, thereby producing pain in the
from repetitive micro trauma, emotional stress
affected joint.
and tension, or any combination of these.
SACROILIAC DYSFUNCTION IN DANCERS WITH LOW BACK PAIN 147
Understanding the contributory factors involved hip and pelvis are the most common sites for mus
in the dancer with low back pain will help great cle imbalance, the most frequently affected being
ly in the treatment of these dysfunctions. the piriformis, which is used in external rotation of
the hip, the turnout position in dance. Overuse of
this muscle, for example when the dancer tries to
CONTRIBUTORY FACTORS
force their turnout, can directly contribute to prob
There is often a synergistic relationship between lems with the SI joint (DeMann 1995).
SI dysfunction and other factors, most notably
aberrant lumbar spine dynamics and lumbar
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL
pelvic muscular involvement (Bachrach 1988). The
FACTORS
biomechanics of the lumbar spine are intimately
involved with the lumbar pelvic region and alter It is commonly accepted today that emotional and
ations in this area can have an effect on the func psychological factors play a role in low back pain,
tion of the SI joint. Problems involving the lumbar yet to what extent and exactly how is still not
disc(s), facet syndromes and lumbar spine known. Every dancer, no matter what their status
derangements (an alteration of the normal or experience level, will suffer performance anxi
dynamics of a joint wherein there is an alteration ety, peer pressure and self-criticism in their pro
to the structural and/or functional relationships) fessional life. Anxiety is common before a
can all contribute to problems of the SI joint. performance and is heightened by participation in
Conversely, alterations in SI joint function can a new ballet or role. Even the most seasoned of
affect these and other areas. Muscle function, like veterans is not exempt from exhibiting some
wise, can not only be affected because of SI dys degree of anxiety before a performance. This'self
function or lumbar spine problems but it can critique' evolves from the 'working in front of a
cause problems in these areas. Strain on the mus mirror' attitude, whereby dancers are constantly
cles of the lower back from overuse (such as the striving to attain an ideal in both body image and
erector spinae, quadratus lumborum and piri movement that is, at best, elusive. Adding to this
formis) can adversely alter SI function. Clinically, is the struggle of balancing their own artistic inter
differential diagnosis of this 'chicken or egg' pretations of dance with that of others. The late
conundrum is a challenge. great choreographer George Balanchine often stat
Other contributory factors affecting the func ed to his dancers 'don't think, just do!' (Martins,
tion of the SI joint in dancers are functional or personal communication), implying that this
structural abnormalities, such as leg length dis expression is somehow to come from some intan
crepancy, pelvic tilt and scoliosis. Scoliosis has gible place mystically deep within themselves.
been reported to be more prevalent in dancers The role that emotional and psychological fac
than in non-dancers (Hamilton et al 1992), while tors play in dancers is currently being explored
leg length has been noted to be an important fac (Hamilton et al 1989; Liederbach et al 1994).
tor concerned with the dynamics of the spine and However, much is still not understood about the
pelvis (Henry 1995). specific pathophysiology of low back pain and
Muscle imbalance is another important consid emotional stress, or indeed SI dysfunction and
eration with the dancer. Muscle balance in this emotional stress. Hypothetically, emotional stress
instance refers to the strength and flexibility of will cause tension within the body and body tis
opposing muscles relative to one another. A well sues, especially, but not limited to, the muscular
balanced ballet class will emphasize movement in system. Since the amount of movement in the SI
all directions. As a result good training will devel joint is small, any further restriction of movement
op muscles symmetrically and proportionally. to this joint can adversely affect its function. The
However, in some instances excessive training and dancer, who needs maximum movement to per
improper technique may cause imbalances in cer form, is thus susceptible to any restriction of SI
tain groups of muscles (Bachrach 1988). In ballet the movement. Not only can emotional stress and ten-
148 SACROILIAC JOINT
sion possibly act as a causative factor in SI joint reographed, the choreographer will often ask the
dysfunction and low back pain, but it can act as a dancer to repeat steps many times, sometimes
factor in the exacerbation of the dysfunction. excessively, in order to see and evaluate the dance.
There are times when a dancer with low back pain Ballets, however, are often not new. More often
cannot dance due to the pain. They may feel that they have been created earlier and usually for a
they are missing valuable (either financial or specific dancer utilizing their specific and some
preparation) time if they are unable to rehearse or times unique physical characteristics in order to
perform because of their injury. Not only does this create postures and movements for that dance.
add to their emotional stress and tension but it The dancer is expected to enter into a role in which
puts the dancer under pressure to return to work their body dynamics may not be the same as the
too soon. original dancer for which it was choreographed.
This form of overuse is common in dance and is
best expressed by Heather Watts, a former princi
WORK AND ENVIRONMENTAL
pal dancer with the New York City Ballet:
FACTORS
Every time I performed Violin Concerto, a very
It has been reported that the majority of ballet challenging ballet, I put my back out. This ballet was
injuries are due to overuse factors (Ryan & choreographed earlier on a different ballerina, whose
Stephens 1987). The classic interpretation and body type was different than mine, and even though
I had a great deal of artistic success with it, my back
application of overuse is such that the body or
did not (Watts, personal communication).
body part(s) used have their physiological capac
ity exceeded by the physical demands placed Environmental factors will also play a large role
upon them. In dance this can happen in a num in low back pain with the dancer. Different floor
ber of ways: (i) the amount of time spent work surfaces on which the dancer rehearses and per
ing and rehearsing; (ii) using the body in new forms can contribute to the concussive forces
and different ways from which it is accustomed; transmitted to the lower back. The ideal floor sur
(iii) repetitive movements; (iv) working in dif face is a wood floor which is 'sprung', covered by
ferent environments. a smooth synthetic rubberized surface. Often
Practice and discipline, words often associated dancers do not have the opportunity of working
with a dancer, are essential because of the hard and on the ideal floor, but rather a much harder unfor
lengthy work necessary not only to become a giving surface. Climate control is another common
dancer but to maintain a dance career. The typical contributor to dance-related lower back injuries.
dancer begins their training at an early age, often Dancers frequently complain of cold or draughty
at or before the age of 8 years, and will begin their studios or theatres. In some cases classes or per
professional career between the ages of 17 and 19 formances may be outdoors in pavilion tents or
years. The professional dancer's schedule com amphitheatres. Cool temperatures make it diffi
monly starts in the morning with an hour and a cult to warmup properly or stay warmedup, cre
half ballet class, followed by rehearsals lasting from ating a potentially harmful situation.
2 to 5 hours, and ending with a performance at
night. During non-performance periods, rehearsal
schedules may be longer. This rigid schedule is TREATMENT
adhered to 6 days a week continuously for weeks
or months depending on the company involved. The therapeutic goal of treatment of the SI joint in
Repetition is a key factor in overuse injuries and dancers is the relief of pain, restoring the biome
the dancer is both vulnerable and susceptible to its chanics of the SI joint, normalizing any lumbar
effects and consequences. When rehearsing a bal spine derangement as well as any muscular
let the dancer will repeat steps and movements in involvement in the back and pelvis, and having
order to learn the ballet. When a new ballet is cho- the dancer return to dance as soon as possible.
SACROILIAC DYSFUNCTION IN DANCERS WITH LOW BACK PAIN 149
Figure 11.7 DeJarnette blocking procedure (category II). Figure 11.8 Sidelying SI joint reduction technique. The
The patient is in the supine position. One wedge is patient is in the sidelying position with the fixated SI joint
placed under the iliac crest on the short leg side lying up and their thigh flexed 90 degrees. The clinician
(posterior ilium) in the direction perpendicular to the applies downward pressure with their thigh on to the
body. The second wedge is placed under the gluteal fold patient's flexed thigh. The contact hand is placed over
in the direction facing the first wedge. and lateral to the SI joint. A quick short thrust is then
delivered with the contact hand in the direction of
posterior to anterior while applying greater downward
pressure on the patient's thigh into adduction.
REFERENCES
Alderink GJ 1991 The sacroiliac joint: review of anatomy, ballet dancers. American Journal of Sports Medicine 17:
mechanics and function. Journal of Orthopaedic and 263-267
Sports Physical Therapy 13(2): 71-84 Hamilton WG, Hamilton LH, Marshall P, Molnar M 1992 A
Bachrach RM 1988 Injuries to the low back/pelvic somatic profile of the musculoskeletal characteristics of elite
dysfunction. Orthopaedic Review 17: 1037-1043 professional ballet dancers. American Journal of Sports
Beal MC 1989 The sacroiliac problem: review of anatomy, Medicine 20(3): 267-273
mechanics and diagnosis. Journal of the American Henry L 1995 Leg length discrepancy in the professional
Osteopathic Association 89(8): 1027-1035 dancer. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal
Blower DW, Griffin AJ 1984 Clinical sacroiliac tests in Rehabilitation 5: 209-217
ankylosing spondylitis and other causes of low back Keller K, West JC 1995 Functional movement impairment in
pain. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 43(2): 192-195 dancers: an assessment and treatment approach
Bourdillon JF 1987 In: Spinal Manipulation, 4th edn. William utilising the biomechanical asymmetry corrector to
Heinemann Medical Books Ltd, London, pp58-72 restore normal mechanics of the spine and pelvis.
Bowen V, Cassidy JD 1981 Macroscopic and microscopic Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
anatomy of the sacroiliac joint from embryonic life until 5: 219-233
the eighth decade. Spine 6: 620-628 Kirkaldy-Willis WH 1983 Manipulation. In: Kirkaldy-Willis
Brooke R 1924 The sacroiliac joint. Journal of Anatomy 58: WHo Managing Low Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone,
298-305 New York, p. 177
Bucci LR 1994 Nutrition Applied to Injury Rehabilitation and Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Hill RJ 1979 A more precise diagnosis
Sports Medicine. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida for low back pain. Spine 4: 102-109
Cox HH 1927 Sacroiliac subluxation as a cause of backache. Krasnow D, Kerr G, Mainwarms L 1994 Psychology of
Surgery Gynaecology and Obstetrics 45: 637-649 dealing with the injured dancer. Medical Problems of
Cummings GS, Crowell RD 1988 Source of error in clinical Performing Artists 9: 7-9
assessment of innominate rotation. Physical Therapy Laslett M, Williams M 1994 The reliability of selected pain
68(1): 77-78 provocation tests for sacroiliac joint pathology. Spine
Davis P, Lentle B 1978 Evidence of sacroiliac disease as a 19(11): 1243-1249
common cause of low backache in women. Lancet 2: Lavignolle B, Vital JM, Senegas J 1983 An approach to the
496-497 functional anatomy of the sacroiliac joints in vivo.
De Jarnette MB 1985 In: Sacral-occipital technique, 2nd Anatomia Clinica 5: 169-176
edn. Nebraska City NE Laws K 1995 The physics and aesthetics of vertical
DeMann Jr LE 1992 Low back pain: a conservative movements in dance. Medical Problems of Performing
approach to a common problem in dancers. Presented Arts: 41-47
Medart World Congress on Arts Medicine, New York, LeBlanc K 1992 Sacroiliac sprain: an overlooked cause of
March back pain. American Family Physician 46(5): 1459-1463
DeMann Jr LE 1995 Piriformis involvement in dancers with Liederbach M, Gleim GW, Nicholas JA 1994 Physiologic
low back pain - a conservation approach. Journal of and psychological measurements of performance stress
Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 5: 247-257 and onset of injuries in professional ballet dancers.
Don Tigny RL 1990 Anterior dysfunction of the sacroiliac Medical Problems of Performing Artists 9: 10-14
joint as a major factor in the aetiology of the idiopathic Lindsay DM, Meeuwisse WH, Vyse A, Mboney ME,
low back pain syndrome. Physical Therapy 70: 250-265 Summersides J 1993 Lumbosacral dYsfunctions in elite
Don Tigny RL 1985 Function and pathomechanics of the cross-country skiers. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
sacroiliac joint. Physical Therapy 65(1): 35-44 Physical Therapy 18(5): 580-585
Drefuss P, Dryer S, Griffin J, Hoffmann J, Walsh N 1994 McGregor M, Cassidy D 1983 Post-surgical sacroliac joint
Positive sacroiliac screening tests in asymptomatic syndrome. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological
adults. Spine 19(10): 1138-1143 Therapies March 6(1): 1-11
Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, Aprill CN, West S, Pier J 1992 Marshall P 1995 Management adaptations for sacroiliac
Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps. Presented at the dysfunction in classical dancers. Journal of Back and
annual meeting of The North American Spine Society Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (5): 235-246
Boston, Massachusetts, July 9-11 Micheli LJ 1983 Back injuries in dancers. Clinical Sports
Garrick JG, Requa RK 1993 Ballet injuries: an analysis of Medicine 2(3): 473-484
epidemiology and financial outcome. American Journal Mierau DR, Cassidy JD, Hamin T, Milne RA 1984 Sacroiliac
of Sports Medicine 21: 586-590 joint dysfunction and low back pain in school aged
Greenman PE 1989 In: Principles of Diagnosis and children. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological
Treatment of Pelvic Girdle Dysfunction. Principles of Therapeutics 7(2): 81-84
Manual Medicine. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Norman F, May A 1956 Sacroiliac conditions simulating
220-270 intervertebral disc disease syndrome. Western Journal
Hald RD 1992 Dance injuries. Primary Care 19: 393-411 of Surgery 64: 461-462.
Hamilton LH, Hamilton WG, Meltzer JD, Marshall P, Molnar Porterfield A, Derosa C 1991 Functional assessment of the
M 1989 Personality, stress, and injuries in professional lumbopelvic region. In: Mechanical Low Back Pain -
152 SACROILIAC JOINT
Perspectives in Functional Anatomy. WB Saunders, Schuchman JA, Cannon C 1986 Sacroiliac strain
Philadelphia, pp123-163 syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Texas Medicine
Potter NA, Rothstein JM 1985 Intertester reliability for 82(6): 33-36
selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Physical SohI P, Bowling A 1990 Injuries to dancers. Prevalence,
Therapy 65(11): 1671-1675 treatment and prevention. Journal of Sports Medicine 9:
Quirk R 1983 Ballet injuries: the Australian experience. 317-322
Clinical Sports Medicine 2: 507-514 Solomon R, Micheli L, Solomon J, Kelley T 1995 The cost
Reid DC 1987 Preventing injuries to the young ballet of injuries in a professional ballet company. Medical
dancer. Physiotherapy Canada 39: 231-236 Problems of Performing Artists 3: 3-10
Ryan A, Stephens RE 1987 The epidemiology of dance Stephens R 1986 The biomechanical aspects of injuries in
injuries. In: Ryan A, Stephens RE (eds) Dance Medicine: elite dancers. In: Ryan AJ, Stephans RE (Eds.) Dance
A Comprehensive Guide. Pluribus Press, Chicago, 3-15 Medicine: A Comprehensive Guide, Pluribus Press,
Sammarco GJ 1984 Diagnosis and treatment in dancers. Chicago
Clinical Orthopaedic Review 187: 176-187 Warren GN 1989 Classical Ballet Technique. The University
Schafle M, Requa R, Garrick JG 1990 Comparison of of South Florida Press, Gainesville
patterns of injury in ballet, modern, and aerobic dance. Washington L 1978 Musculoskeletal injuries in theatrical
In: Solomon R, Minton SC, Solomon J (eds) Preventing dancers: site, frequency and severity. American Journal
Dance Injuries: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. of Sports Medicine 6: 75-98
American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Williams PL (eds) 1995 Gray's Anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill
Recreation and Dance, Reston, VA Livingstone, New York, pp674-676
SECTION 5
General
SECTION CONTENTS
Introduction 156
Conclusion 168
Functional stability is dependent on integrated
Postscript 171 local and global muscle function. Mechanical sta
bility dysfunction presents as segmental (articular)
and multisegmental (myofascial) dysfunction.
These dysfunctions present as combinations of
restriction of normal motion and associated com
pensations (give) to maintain function. Stability
dysfunction is diagnosed by the site and direction
of give or compensation that relates to symptomatic
pathology. Strategies to manage mechanical sta
bililty dysfunction require specific mobilization of
articular and connective tissue restrictions, regain
ing myofascial extensibility, retraining global sta
bility muscle control of myofascial compensations
and local stability muscle recruitment to control
segmental motion. Stability retraining targets both
the local and global stability systems. Activation of
the local stability system to increase muscle stiff
ness along with functional low-load integration in
the neutral joint position controls segmental or
articular give. Global muscle retraining is required
to correct multisegmental or myofascial dysfunc
tion in terms of controlling the site and direction of
load that relates to provocation. The strategy here
is to train low-load recruitment to control and limit
motion at the site of pathology and then actively
move the adjacent restriction, regain through range
control of motion with the global stability muscles
and regain sufficient extensibility in the global
mobility muscles to allow normal function.
Individual strategies for integrating local and glob
al recruitment retraining back into normal function
are suggested. Manual Therapy (2001) 6(1), 3-14
155
156 GENERAL
INTRODUCTION
Local stabilizers The functional stability role is to maintain low force continuous activity in all positions of joint range
and in all directions of joint motion. This activity increases local muscle stiffness at a segmental level
to control excessive physiological and translational motion, especially in the neutral joint position
where passive support from the' ligaments and capsule is minimal. Their activity often increases in an
anticipatory action prior to load or movement, thus providing joint protection and support.
Global stabilizers The functional stability role is to generate torque and provide eccentric control of inner and outer range
of joint motion. They need to be able to (i) concentrically shorten into the full physiological inner range
position; (ii) isometrically hold position and; (iii) eccentrically control or decelerate functional load
against gravity. They should contribute significantly to rotation control in all functional movements.
Global mobilizers Muscles that primarily have a mobilizing role are required to have adequate length to allow full
physiological and accessory (translational) range of joint movement without causing compensatory
overstrain elsewhere in the movement system. Their functional stability role is to augment stability
under high load or strain, leverage disadvantage, lifting, pushing, pulling or ballistic shock absorption.
These muscles are particularly efficient in the sagittal plane, but even though they can generate high
forces they do not contribute significantly to rotation control and they cannot provide segmental
control of physiological and translational motion.
Force couples act around all three axes of a joint. Overpull: generated by
dominant or overactive muscle
If the force vectors function ideally, there is a bal
ance between the force vectors of synergistic and
antagonistic muscles and there is equilibrium
Displacement of 'Give' or
between the active and passive forces such that the the axis of rotation compensatory
axis of rotation or the path of the instantaneous cen hypermobility
r1
have stability dysfunction in more than one direc
tion. Several different motion segments can have
c o mP o" stability dysfunction at the same time, though usu
ally in different directions. Adjacent sites can have
stability dysfunction in different directions.
Inappropriate motion may be shunted up or down
Give the kinetic chain. The site of stability dysfunction
1
is not always proximal- it may be distal to the site
of the dysfunction (Comerford & Mottram 2000).
When a patient presents with chronic or recur
Patho lo gy rent pain several factors may contribute to the
1
patient's symptoms. There may be articular (seg
mental) give and restriction and there may be
myofascial (multi-segmental) give and restriction
Pain
in any combination (Table 12.3), which constitute
Figure 12.3 Seq ue lae of muscle imbalance. the mechanical component of movement dysfunc-
FUNCTION AL STABILITY RETRAINING 159
tion. There is an element of pathology that requires extensibility testing, some form of
treatment and there may or may not be significant myofascial lengthening teclmique may be
non-mechanical factors influencing the patient's used to regain extensibility.
symptoms and disability. All these elements pres 3. When movement analysis and specific
ent in varying proportions and as such need to be muscle stability testing identifies a
evaluated and managed accordingly (Fig. 12.4). It multisegmental give, the muscles that
is important to relate the 'give' to symptoms and control range of motion (specifically the
pathology and to the mechanism of provocation. global stability muscles) can be retrained to
This identifies the 'give' that is of clinical priority. control excessive range.
'Give' that may be evident, but does not relate to 4. When a segmental give is identified by
the mechanism of symptom provocation, is not a specific stability assessment, then the local
priority of management. However, it may indicate stability muscles may be retrained to
potential risk for the future. improve low threshold recruitment and
When give and restriction are identified, four increase segmental muscle stiffness to
strategies must be developed to manage the rele control excessive translation.
vant dysfunction.
Regional pain or joint effusion has been shown to
1. When a segmental (articular) restriction
alter the normal recruitment processes of the local
identified with some form of manual
stability muscles around the joint (Stokes & Young
palpation, then some specific joint
1984; Richardson & Bullock 1986; Hodges &
mobilization techniques can be applied to
Richardson 1996; Hides et a11996; Richardson et
mobilize the restriction.
al 1999; Jull et al 1999; Comerford & Mottram
2. When a multi-segmental (myofascial)
2001). Because of this, the local stability muscles
restriction is identified by muscle
should be retrained if pain is a feature whether
excessive segmental translation can be identified
Non-mechanical pain or not. Specific options familiar to most manual
therapists are detailed in Table 12.4.
Articular Myofascicular
(segmental or translational) (multi-segmental)
Give • Facilitate tonic activation of the deep local • Facilitate tonic activation of the monoarticular
stabilizers to increase muscle stiffness for control global stabilizers such that the muscle's active
of the neutral joint position to provide dynamic shortened position can control the joint's inner
stability when there is passive connective tissue range motion (and hypermobile outer range
laxity motion)
• Surgical reconstruction may attempt to augment • Strengthening exercises can increase muscle
stability but this is generally a salvage procedure stiffness and co-contraction rigidity to limit
excessive motion - but it is difficult to maintain
• Immobilization may shorten lax connective
control during fast or large-range movements
structures but this has limited long-term effect
Restriction • Manual mobilization - end range accessory • Muscle lengthening techniques - sustained
movements (oscillatory glides or thrust stretch, facilitatory stretches (contract-relax) and
techniques) inhibitory stretches (active inhibitory restabilization
and antagonist hold-relax)
• Specific connective tissue mobilization or • Type I METs - muscle energy techniques or
massage Inhibitory MAPs - myotactic activation procedures
• Type II METs - muscle energy techniques or • Myofascial trigger point release or strain -
Facilitatory MAPs - myotatic activation counterstrain
procedures
• SNAGs and localized mobilizations with • Mobilizing exercises
movement
• Neurodynamic techniques
integration of the local and global stabilizer mus Table 12.5 Clinical guidelines for local stabilizer
retraining.
cles to control the neutral joint position. Retraining
should be facilitated in a pain-free posture or posi • Palpate for the correct activation
tion. The neutral joint position is ideal because the • Observe for:
local stability muscles primarily control this posi -Correct contraction pattern
-Tonic (slow motor unit) recruitment (no fatigue under
tion. Retraining emphasizes the local stability low load)
muscles, though clinically it seems acceptable to -No substitution
allow some co-activation of the global stability • No Pain
• Breathe normally with a consistent, sustained
muscles as they co-activate synergistically in nor contraction - no co-contraction rigidity
mal function. However, it is important that the • Low-force sustained hold with normal breathing
local stability muscles dominate the contraction (10 seconds and repeat 10 times)
• Perform in a variety of different functional postures
and the global stability muscles only recruit with -Correct contraction pattern
low-load, low-threshold coactivation. Also, there -Tonic (slow motor unit) recruitment (no fatigue under
must be no significant increase in activation of the low load)
global mobility muscles.
The ability to sustain a consistent low force and into functional activities. Clinical guidelines
hold is paramount for rehabilitation of motor con for the assessment and retraining of local stabiliz
trol deficits. High perceived effort is permissible er recruitment are listed in Table 12.5.
initially, but as control and functional integration
return low-effort activation should dominate. No
Facilitation strategies for low
fatigue or substitution should occur during the
threshold slow motor unit training
exercises. Motor control and recruitment are the
priority (not strength and flexibility). The activa Two categories of facilitation are suggested. The first
tion should be integrated through the entire range category (the A list) uses very specific unloaded
FUNCTIONAL STABILITY RETRAINING 161
,
• No global dominance
I
I I
I • Add functional loads I
I •
Integrate local and I
global control I
t •
Integrate into normal
function
Appropriate facilitation strategies
• Proprioceptive input
• Cognitive awareness
�-----------------� •
•
Co-activation
Automatic reflex recruitment
Feedback - tactile and visual
Figure 12.7 Facilitation strategies. Reproduced with kind permission of Kinetic Control.
Figure 12.8 (A) Lumbopelvic rotation control. Slowly allow the bent leg to be lowered out to the side, keeping the foot
supported beside the straight leg. The leg can be lowered out so far as no rotation of the pelvis occurs. The abdominal
muscles, which stabilize the trunk, must coordinate with adductor muscles, which eccentrically lower the leg. (B)
Lumbopelvic flexion control. A further progression would be to perform the exercise with a 'sit fit'under the pelvis creating
an unstable base and increasing the proprioceptive challenge. Reproduced with kind permission of Kinetic Control.
Figure 12.9 Lumbar flexion control. Backward rocking GLOBAL STABILITY SYSTEM:
with independent hip flexion, but only as far as the CONTROL OF IMBALANCE
neutral lumbopelvic position can be maintained. Progress
until good control is achieved through half range (1200
hip flexion) is easy. Performing this exercise on a 'fitter'
provides an unstable base and increased proprioceptive
III. REHABILITATE GLOBAL
challenge. Reproduced with kind permission of Kinetic STABILIZER CONTROL THROUGH
Control. RANGE
The global stability system is required to actively
local stabilizers) to hold the dysfunctional region control the full available range of joint motion.
or segment in a neutral position (± assisted or sup These muscles are required to be able to control
ported), the adjacent joint or motion segment is limb load whilst maintaining low-force, low-thresh
moved through its available range. Movement at old recruitment and concentrically shorten through
the adjacent joint should only occur as far as iso to the full passive inner range of joint motion. They
metric control (no movement) of the dysfunction must also be able to control limb load eccentrically
al region can be maintained and the restriction at against gravity and through any hypennobile outer
the adjacent joint allows. Slow, low-effort repeti range. The ability to control rotational forces is an
tions and movement only through the range that especially important role of global stabilizers.
the dysfunction is controlled actively should be Through range control is optimized by low-effort,
164 GENERAL
patients do not seem to be able to do this but local stabilizer muscles may need to be facilitat
appear to get the correct activation when they do ed (Comerford & Mottram 2000).
not think about a specific muscle. Instead they When the red dot is sighted, the subject is
seem to use nonspecific motor control strategies, reminded to activate the key local stability muscle
such as correcting alignment or posture, achieving for their specific problem. The muscle is contract
a certain position or moving in a certain way to get ed at low effort (less than 25% of maximum volun
the activation required. By finding the right com tary contraction (MVC)), and is held for several
bination of structured or nonstructured and spe seconds and repeated several times, without inter
cific or nonspecific motor control retraining, there rupting normal or functional activities. This process
are many options (Fig. 12.14), so it should be pos is repeated each time that a red dot is sighted. Red
sible to identify a combination that will maintain dots should be placed in appropriate positions (e.g.
motivation and achieve compliance for most wristwatch, clock, telephone, coffee/tea making
patients. Several options are presented below. area, office drawer, bathroom mirror, under refrig
erator door seal) as reminders to exercise.
'Red dot' functional integration {non
structured and specific} Low-load spinal proprioception
{structured and nonspecific}
Rothstein (1982) has suggested that to integrate
an activity or skill into normal, automatic or The aim is to integrate stability muscle recruit
unconscious function many repetitions must be ment around neutral joint positions with auto
performed under diverse functional situations. matic postural reflex responses. In the neutral
To do this, some form of 'reminder' is needed. joint position afferent information from the joint
Rothstein (1982) has proposed that small 'red ligaments and capsules is minimized. Training is
dots' placed so that they are frequently seen will performed sitting or standing on a series of pro
'remind' the subject to perform a specific task gressively unstable bases or supports. The eyes
each time they are observed. This process lends are open for initial training but as control
itself well to training of the local stability system. improves they can be closed, the muscle system
Frequent tonic activation of the key local stabil being thus relied on for proprioception. Figure
ity muscle is suggested for dynamic postural re 12.15 illustrates this process. The 'Pilates
education and integration into 'normal function'. Reformer', the 'Fitter ' (Fitter International Inc
Depending on the area of dysfunction, different Calgary, Canada) and the 'Physio Ball' are also
appropriate and useful tools.
Integrative dissociation (structured activities. The local stabilizer muscles are neces
and nonspecific) sary to maintain correct alignment of the spine
This process is based on the control of direction and girdle segments to provide a stable base for
training discussed earlier in this article. Once the efficient limb and trunk movement (Crisco &
basic motor control skill of 'control the give and Panjabi 1991; Cholewicki & McGill 1996).
move the restriction' has been learnt, this strategy Cognitive retraining to develop self-awareness of
of controlling the region of dysfunction is incorpo body segments and develop position sense and
rated with functionally orientated exercises where, voluntary control during weight-transfer activi
so long as the problem region is controlled, any ties can be used as part of integrative training.
other movement is appropriate. This can be built The spine should be able to maintain a fairly
into an exercise programme or just simply 'control neutral position during low-load weight-transfer
the give while performing functional tasks'. activities and normal gait. The pelvis should not
initiate or drag the trunk into weight transference.
The shoulder girdle should not lead and produce
Control of the centre of gravity (non
large-range spinal movement. This should be per
structured and nonspecific)
formed while maintaining spinal neutral and
The ability to move the centre of gravity of the maintaining the alignment of the centre of gravity
body over its base of support at a global level and of sequential segments: move forward to back
to maintain the centre of gravity of individual ward, side to side. This can be progressed to
motion segments over their adjacent segment at a standing or sitting on an unstable base (balance
local level is essential for efficient movement. This board, Sitfit (Sissel UK, Ltd) Physio Ball, Pilates
is especially important during weight-transfer Reformer, Fitter, aerobic slide board etc.)
168 GENERAL
Approach Process
Other approaches
REFERENCES
Bergmark A 1 989 Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in Kinetic Control Movement Dysfunction Course. Kinetic
mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopaedica Control, Southampton
Scandinavica 230(60): 20-24 Comerford M, Mottram S 2001 Movement and stability
Cholewicki J, McGill S 1 996 Mechanical stability in the vivo dysfunction - contemporary developments. Manual
lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low Therapy 6(1 ): 1 5-26
back pain. Clinical Biomechanics 1 1 (1): 1 -1 5 Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM 1 991 The intersegmental and
Comerford M , Mottram S 2000 Movement Dysfunction multisegmental muscles of the lumbar spine. Spine
Focus on Dynamic Stability and Muscle Balance: 1 6(7): 792-793
FUNCTIONAL STABILITY RETRAINING 169
Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA 1 996 Multifidus recovery O'Sullivan P, Twomey L, Allison G 1 998 Altered abdominal
is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode muscle recruitment in back pain patients following
low back pain. Spine 21 (23): 2763-2769 specific exercise intervention. Journal of Orthopaedics
Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1 996 Inefficient muscular and Sports Physical Therapy 27(2): 1 1 4- 1 24
stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low Richardson C, Bullock MI 1 986 Changes in muscle activity
back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus during fast, alternating flexion-extension movements of
abdominis. Spine 21 (22): 2640-2650 the knee. Scandanavian Journal of Rehabilitation
Janda V 1 978 Muscles, central nervous motor regulation Medicine 1 8: 51 -58
and back problems. In: Korr 1M (ed) The Neurological Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J 1 999 Therapeutic
Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy. Plenum Press, Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilization in Low Back
New York, pp 27-41 Pain: Scientific Basis and Clinical Approach. Churchill
Jull G, Barrett C, Magee R, Ho P 1 999 Further clinical Livingstone, Edinburgh
clarification of the muscle dysfunction in cervical Rothstein J M 1 982 Muscle biology. Clinical considerations.
headache. Cephalaegia 1 9(3): 1 79-185 Physical Therapy 62(1 2): 1 823-1 830
O'Sullivan P, Twomey L, Allison G 1 995 Evaluation of Sahrmann SA 1 992 Posture and muscle imbalance: faulty
specific stabilizing exercises in the treatment of chronic lumbar-pelvic alignment and associated musculoskeletal
low back pain with radiological diagnosis of spondylosis pain syndromes. Orthopaedic Division Review 1 3-20
or spondylolisthesis. In: Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Sahrmann SA 2001 Diagnosis & Treatment of Movement
Conference of the Manipulative Physiotherapists Impairment Syndromes. Mosby, USA
Association of Australia. Gold Coast, 1 1 3-1 1 4 Stokes M, Young A 1 984 Investigations of quadriceps
O'Sullivan PB, Twomey L , Allison G 1 997a Evaluation of inhibition: implications for clinical practice.
specific stabilizing exercises in the treatment of chronic Physiotherapy 70(1 1 ): 425-428
low back pain with radiological diagnosis of spondylosis Stubbs M, Harris M, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Lu Y, Barrata
or spondylolisthesis. Spine 22(24): 2959-2967 RV 1 998 Ligamento-muscular protective reflex in the
O'Sullivan PB, Twomey L, Allison G, Sinclair J, Miller K, lumbar spine of the feline. Journal of Electromyography
Knox J 1 997b Altered patterns of abdominal muscle and Kinesiology 8(4): 1 97-204
activation in patients with chronic low back pain.
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 43(2): 9 1 -98
1 70 GENERAL
FUNCTIONAL STABILITY RETRAINING 171
Recruitment • Looks easy and feels easy to prevent give into the test o
direction
• No extra feedback needed (tactile or visual) o
• Available range at least meets the Benchmark Standard: o
([range of dissociation])
• No external support or unloading o
• Normal relaxed breathing o
• No fatigue o
OVERALL RATING
././: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'dissociation pattern' + all requirements for 'recruitment'
./X: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'dissociation pattern' + fails any of the requirements for 'recruitment'
XX: If the muscle fails any of the requirements for 'dissociation pattern'
In order to keep the process 'clinician friendly', a back should be used to ensure that the patient
'v' or 'X' rating is given for each of these two ele understands and has experienced the movement
ments. The ratings for both elements are com or activation required. Then this self-feedback is
bined to give one of three possible scores ranging eliminated before rating and testing the efficacy of
from vV' (correct muscle activation + efficient low-threshold voluntary recruitment.
recruitment) through V'X (correct muscle activa This system has been developed around the
tion + inefficient recruitment) to XX (incorrect requirements for stability function and the four
muscle activation due to substitution) (Table 12.8). principles of low-load stability rehabilitation sug
The test movements are not 'normal' move gested by Comerford and Mottram (2001a,
ments but they are nevertheless movement pat 2001b). These principles are control of direction,
terns or skills that everybody has the ability to control of neutral, control through range and
learn and perform easily (Comerford & Mottram control of extensibility.
200lb). Even though the test manoeuvres may feel
unfamiliar they are low load and should not be
CON TROL OF DIRECTION
perceived as 'hard work'. As these test movements
are not normal or habitual movements there is a Each direction is assessed separately. The ability
requirement to teach the movement pattern so that to perform a direction specific dissociation
the patient can practise the test movement or acti manoeuvre is rated. To achieve a 'V'V" rating the
vation correctly. Verbal description, demonstration, patient must be able to demonstrate the direction
hands-on facilitation and visual or tactile self-feed- specific recruitment pattern to control and prevent
FUNCTIONAL STABILITY RETRAINING 173
OVERALL RATING
././ If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'specific activation' + all requirements for 'recruitment'
./)(: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'specific activation' + fails any of the requirements for 'recruitment'
)()(: If the muscle fails any of the requirements for 'specific activation'
Muscle shortening • The muscle can actively shorten through the available o
(including hypermobile) passive joint range in the position of
the muscle's combined actions
• Concentrically shorten against functional load and gravity o
• Can hold this position for at least 2-3 seconds o
• With passive fixation of the proximal girdle or trunk o
• Without substitution by other muscles o
OVERALL RATING
././: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'muscle shortening' + all requirements for 'recruitment'
.IX: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'muscle shortening' + fails any of the requirements for 'recruitment'
XX: If the muscle fails any of the requirements for 'muscle shortening'
OVERALL RATING
././: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'passive extensibility' + all requirements for 'active control'
.IX: If the muscle demonstrates all requirements for 'passive extensibility' + fails any of the requirements for 'active control'
XX: If the muscle fails any of the requirements for 'passive extensibility'
REFERENCES
Adams M, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P 2002 The Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1 999 Altered trunk muscle
Biomechanics of Back Pain. Churchill Livingstone, recruitment in people with low back pain with upper
Edinburgh limb movement at different speeds. Archives of
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL 200 1 a Movement and stability Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80: 1 005-1 0 1 2
dysfunction - contemporary developments. Manual Janda V 1 985 Pain in the locomotor system - A broad
Therapy 6(1 ): 1 5-26 approach. In: Glasgow et al (ed) Aspects of Manipulative
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL 2001 b Functional stability Therapy. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh pp1 48-1 51
retraining: Principles & strategies for managing Janda V 1 996 Evaluation of muscle imbalance. In:
mechanical dysfunction. Manual Therapy 6(1 ): 3-1 4 Liebenson C (ed) Rehabilitation of the Spine. Williams &
Gandevia SC 1 994 The sensation of effort co-varies with Wilkins, Baltimore
reflex effects on the motorneurone pool: evidence and Jull GA 2000 Deep cervical flexor muscle dysfunction in
implications. International Journal of Industrial whiplash. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 8(1 /2): 1 43-1 54
Ergonomics 1 3: 41 -49 Richardson C, Jull G, Hodges P, Hides J 1 999 Therapeutic
Grimby L, Hannerz J 1 976 Disturbances in voluntary Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabilization in Low Back
recruitment order of low and high frequency motor units Pain: Scientific Basis and Clinical Approach. Churchill
on blockades of proprioceptive afferent activity. Acta Livingstone, Edinburgh
Physiologica Scandinavica 96: 207-2 1 6 Sahrmann SA 2002 Diagnosis & Treatment of Movement
Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull G A 1 996 Multifidus recovery Impairment Syndromes. Mosby, USA
is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode Stokes MA, Cooper R, Morris G, Jayson MIV 1 992 Selective
low back pain. Spine 21 (23): 2763-2769 changes in multifidus dimensions in patients with chronic
Hodges PW, Richardson CA 1 996 Inefficient muscular low back pain. European Spine Journal 1 : 38-42
stabilisation of the lumbar spine associated with low Stokes M, Young A 1 984 Investigations of quadriceps
back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus inhibition: implications for clinical practice.
abdominis. Spine 21 (22): 2640-2650 Physiotherapy 70(1 1 ) : 425-428
1 76 GENERAL
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 177
Examination 178
The Mulligan Concept:
Treatment 179
its application in the
NAGs 179
management of spinal
SNAGs 180
conditions
Possible mechanisms and future research 183
Conclusion 184
L. Exelby
Pinehill Hospital, Hitchen, North Herts, UK
INTRODUCTION
mobilizations called NAGs and sustained mobi Hetherington 1996; O'Brien & Vicenzino 1998;
lizations with active movement called SNAGs are Lincoln 2000; Miller 2000). Recently, however,
the mainstay of this Concept's spinal treatment research measuring the neurophysiological or
(Mulligan 1999). Mulligan proposed that when an mechanical effects has been conducted (Kavanagh
increase in pain-free range of movement occurs 1999; Hall et al 2000; Vicenzino et al 2000; Abbot
with a SNAG it primarily consists of the correction et al. 2001a, b). The bulk of this research is con
of a positional fault at the zygapophyseal joint, fined to peripheral MWMs. In this article, the
although a SNAG also influences the entire spinal principles of examination and treatment are out
functional unit (SFU). Recently, the evolution of this lined and clinical examples are used to illustrate
Concept has supported the use of a transverse glide the Concept's application to the spine and how it
applied to the spinous process with active spinal has evolved and been integrated into physiother
movement. A further development in the 1990s was apy practice. New applications are described that
spinal mobilizations with limb movements can assist in the correction of dysfunctional
(SMWLMs). Here a sustained transverse glide to movement. A future research direction is pro
the spinous process of a vertebra is applied while posed in the light of preliminary research results.
the restricted peripheral joint movement is per
formed actively or passively (Mulligan 1999). The
mobilization must result in a symptom-free move EXAMINATION
ment. Mulligan (1999) proposed that the applica
tion of these techniques, was appropriate when By definition SNAGs involve manually facilitating
peripheral joint limitation of movement could be restricted joint gliding to allow pain-free move
spinal in origin. This has further evolved into ment. This in itself can be a simple differential diag
simultaneous gliding of spinal and peripheral joints nostic tool. SNAGs and MWMs can be a powerful
with movement. Mobilizations with movements complementary assessment tool when differentiat
(MWMs) is the terminology used when applying ing between more complex clinical presentations,
an accessory glide to an active peripheral joint e.g. lumbar spine, sacroiliac joint and hip.
movement and is described in other texts (Mulligan The Mulligan Concept of accessory gliding
1993, 1999; Exelby 1996). with active movement can be further expanded
Literature on the efficacy of Mulligan's tech in our clinical practice to justify its place in the
niques is lacking and dominated by descriptive or assessment of muscle dysfunction. When
case report publications (Wilson 1994, 1997, 2001; analysing a functional movement the cause of
Exelby 1995, 1996, 2001; Vicenzino & Wright 1995; the symptoms can be established by integrating
this Concept with Sahrmann's theories (2002) principles can be applied to the myofascial sys
namely 'the pathway of instantaneous centre of tem. Fascial tension can be altered or muscle trig
motion' and 'relative flexibility'. Clinically, a ger point pressure applied and the response to the
SNAG on a painful mobile level may not always movement restriction noted.
achieve a full pain-free movement, whereas
restricting the movement of a painful mobile
segment or gliding a nearby stiff segment does TREATMENT
achieve the desired result. For example, a patient
with rightsided C5/6 cervical and upper arm The strength of this Concept also lies in its adapt
symptoms of low irritability presented with a ability and ability to be integrated with most other
limitation of right cervical spine rotation. Full commonly used musculoskeletal concepts (Wilson
range right rotation was achieved by applying a 1994, 1995; Exelby 1995). Some clinical examples
left unilateral SNAG on C1 in its horizontal will illustrate the diversity of this concept in multi
treatment plane. Interventions at other levels structural integrated treatments.
had been unsuccessful. The possible explanation
may be that the upper cervical spine segment
was blocked causing lower cervical spine over NAGS
strain. Amevo et al (1992) demonstrated in cer
vical pain patients that abnormal instantaneous Mulligan (1999) described NAGs for use in the
axes of rotation (IAR) in the upper cervical spine cervical and upper thoracic spine. NAGs are pas
significantly correlated with pain found in the sive oscillatory techniques performed parallel to
lower cervical spine segments. the facet joint planes. The anatomical configura
This analysis of functional movement must be tion of the upper two joints of the cervical spine
used in collaboration with other components of necessitates a glide in a more horizontal plane.
the assessment procedure and is valuable in help The NAGs are performed with the patient seated.
ing to identify areas on which to focus more spe A pillow supporting the arms will reduce tension
cific examination procedures. Intervertebral in the neural tissue and myofascia around the
physiological and accessory active and passive neck and scapula. NAGs are invaluable when
motion testing (Maitland 1986) performed in performed well and can be used on most spinal
weight bearing or lying is a necessity when the pathology. They are the treatment of choice for
Concept is used in this way. While the Mulligan more acute inflammatory pathology (Exelby 1995;
Concept is essentially an articular technique, the Mulligan 1999). In the author's experience they
are less successful in the cervical spine if patients
present with fixed forward neck postures with
adaptive posterior soft tissue shortening. In this
type of patient a NAG directed in a supero-ante
rior direction may be more difficult and com
pression of the facet joint surfaces instead could
occur. NAGs are particularly useful in the cervi
cal spine for mobilizing stiff joints that neighbour
hypermobile segments. In this case they are mod
ified, and applying the NAG with the thumb frees
up the other fingers to fix the mobile segment
anteriorly (Fig. 13.2). By positioning the patient
in sidelying or supported, forward sitting NAGs
can be performed on the rest of the thoracic spine
and even the lumbar spine. In the thoracic spine
Figure 13.2 Localized NAG fixing level below anteriorly. they can be used for mobilizing segments that are
180 GENERAL
fixed in extension (Fig. 13.3). These patients often are most successful when symptoms are pro
have an adverse response to postero-anteriorly voked by a movement and are not multi-level
directed mobilizations performed in the tradi (Mulligan 1999; Wilson 2001). They are not the
tional prone position. treatment of choice in conditions that are highly
irritable (Maitland 1986).
Although SNAGs are usually performed in
S NAGs functional weight-bearing positions they can be
adapted for use in non-weight-bearing positions.
SNAGs as a treatment modality can be applied to For example they can be applied in lying to
all the spinal joints, the rib cage and the sacroili McKenzie lumbar spine extensions or to the lum
ac joint and are described in detail in Mulligan's bar spine joints in a four point kneel position
book (1999). They provide a method to improve (Exelby 2001).
restricted joint range when symptoms are move
ment induced. The therapist facilitates the appro
FACILITATING FUNCTIONAL
priate accessory zygapophyseal joint glide while
MOVEMENT PAT TERNS WITH
the patient performs the symptomatic movement
S NAGS
(Fig. 13.4). The facilitatory glide must result in
full-range pain-free movement. Sustained end In problematic patients with mechanical stability
range holds or overpressure can be applied to the dysfunction, treatment of the restriction may not
physiological movement. This previously symp result in long-lasting changes in symptoms. There
tomatic motion is repeated up to three times is a need for these patients to change their posture
while the therapist continues to maintain the and dysfunctional movement within their func
appropriate accessory glide. Further repetitions tional demands of daily living (O'Sullivan 2000).
may be performed depending on the severity, irri Various strategies used by physiotherapists may
tability, and nature of the pathology (Maitland improve proprioception via joint and muscle
1986). Failure to improve the comparable move receptor input to assist this functional adjustment.
ment would indicate that the therapist has not In the author 's experience this concept can be
found the correct contact point, spinal segment, modified so that an articular glide can be applied
amount of force or direction of mobilization, or to an active corrected movement pattern, which
that the technique is simply not indicated. SNAGs can help to provide proprioceptive input to an
Figure 13.3 NAGs applied in sidelying position to Figure 13.4 A unilateral SNAG applied to the left C5
promote flexion in an extended thoracic spine. zygapophyseal joint.
THE MULLIGAN CONCEPT: ITS APPLIC ATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL CONDITIONS 181
unfamiliar movement. The application can be pro mental lordosis and excessive upper lumbar spine
gressed to more challenging positions and tasks. extension. Passive intervertebral joint testing
An illustrative example may be a patient who reveals a limitation of lower lumbar spine exten
presents with a loss of lower lumbar spine seg- sion. A SNAG can be applied to these stiff joints
in positions of sidelying, sitting or standing while
the patient performs a localized anterior tilt with
the upper lumbar spine fixed in some degree of
flexion (Fig. 13.5).
latter may be a limitation of the median nerve mobility. A transverse glide is applied to a spinal
upper limb tension test (ULTT 1) (Butler 1991). segment while a second person performs a pas
The patient is positioned with the upper arm sup sive SLR. The neighbouring joint can be fixed with
ported, the comparable movement being active an opposing transverse glide. The spinal glide
elbow extension. The therapist applies a trans must result in a pain-free passive SLR. The tech
verse glide on a spinous process that enables pain nique can be successfully modified for use by a
free elbow extension. The glide is maintained and single therapist (Fig. 13.8). The thigh and hip are
the pain-free elbow extension is repeated. Neural supported on a pillow; the transverse spinal glide
tissue must be given the respect it deserves: too must alleviate the symptoms provoked by active
much repetition of an aggravating movement knee extension with or without ankle dorsiflexion.
when trying to identify a pain-easing glide may Applying ischaemic compression pressure to the
result in neural tissue irritation. Sound clinical piriformis trigger point (Travell & Simons 1992)
decision making is necessary to decide if this tech while the patien.t performs active knee extension
nique is appropriate to the presenting clinical find can also result in marked improvement in sciatic
ings. In the above example C7 was restricted and pain and SLR mobility when the spinal glides
rotated. Elbow extension was improved with a have been ineffectual. This has often proved more
corrective transverse glide applied to the spinous successful than releasing piriformis passively. The
process of C7 (Fig. 13.7). groups of patients that benefit particularly from
this technique are those with a positive piriformis
trigger point (Travell & Simons 1992) and more
SPINAL MOBILIZATIONS WITH LEG
chronic symptoms, and post-spinal surgery
MOVEMENTS
patients. The latter are often left with residual
In the lower limb the application of this technique moderate buttock and leg aching.
is usually indicated when there is a restriction of Other interfaces in the limbs (Wilson 1994, 1995;
the straight leg raise (SLR) (Mulligan 1995, 1999). Exelby 1996) can be used in conjunction with pas
Once the lumbar spine has been palpated, usual sive joint or myofascial release work. It is impor
ly in prone, for intervertebral pain, restriction and tant to remember that the full explanation for the
alignment, the patient is placed in the sidelying changes in symptoms is probably far more com
position. Further spinal palpation can be carried plex than an alteration of local abnormal biome
out with limb movement to assess intervertebral chanics alone.
Figure 13.7 A ctive elbow extension performed in a Figure 13.8 A SMWLM is performed in the sidelying
modified ULLT 1 position. A transverse glide is applied to position. The patient's hip is flexed and supported on a
the C7 spinous process to correct its rotated position. pillow. A corrective transverse glide is applied to L5 with
This results in pain-free active elbow extension. L4 fixed while the patient performs active knee extension.
THE MULLIGAN CONCEPT: ITS APPLICATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL CONDITIONS 183
REFERENCES
Abbott JH, Patla CE, Jenson RH 2001a The initial effects of Hides JA, Cooper DH, Stokes MJ 1992 Diagnostic
an elbow mobilisation with movement technique on grip ultrasound imaging for measurement of the lumbar
strength in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Manual multifidus in normal young adults. Physiotherapy Theory
Therapy 6(3): 163-169 and Practice 8: 19-26
Abbott JH, Patla CE, Jenson RH 2001b Mobilisation with Hides J, Richardson C, Jull G, Davies S 1995 Ultrasound
movement applied to the elbow affects shoulder range imaging in rehabilitation. Australian Journal of
of motion in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Manual Physiotherapy 41(3): 187-193
Therapy 6(3): 170-177 Hodges PW 1999 Is there a role for transversus abdominis
Amevo B, Aprill C, Bogduk N 1992 Abnormal instantaneous in lumbo-pelvic stability? Manual Therapy 4(2): 74-86
axes of rotation in patients with neck pain. Spine 17(7): Jull GA 2000a The physiotherapy management of
748-756 cervicogenic headache: A randomised controlled study.
Butler OS 1991 Mobilisation of the Nervous System. In: Singer KP (ed) Proceedings of the 7th Scientific
Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 147-152 Conference of the IFOMT in conjunction with the
Colloca CJ, Keller TS 2001 Electrom yographic reflex Biennial Conference of the MPAA. Perth, Australia, 9-10
responses to mechanical force, manually assisted spinal November, p.100
manipulative therapy. Spine 26(10): 1117-1124 Jull GA 2000b Deep cervical flexor muscle dysfunction in
Exelby L 1995 Mobilisations with movement: a personal whiplash. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 8(1/2): 143-154
view. Physiotherapy 81(12): 724-729 Kaltenborn FM 1989 Mobilisation of the Extremity Joints.
Exelby L 1996 Peripheral mobilisations with movement. 4th edn. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Products, USA
Manual Therapy 1(3): 118-126 Katavich L 1999 Neural mechanisms underlying manual
Exelby L 200Hhe locked facet joint: intervention using cervical traction. The Journal of Manual and
mobilisations with movement. Manual Therapy 6(2): Manipulative Therapy 7(1): 20-25
116-121 Kavanagh J 1999 Is there a positional fault at the inferior
Goldby L, Moore A, Doust J, Trew M, Lewis J 2001 A tibiofibular joint in patients with acute or chronic sprains
randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of compared to normals? Manual Therapy 4(1): 19-24
manual therapy, exercises to rehabilitate spinal Lincoln J 2000 Clinical instability of the upper cervical
stabilisation and an education booklet in the spine. Manual Therapy 5(1): 41-46
conservative treatment of chronic low back pain Maitland GO 1986 Vertebral Manipulation, 5th edn.
disorder. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference Butterworths, London
on Movement Dysfunction 'Integrating Approaches. Miller J 2000 Mulligan Concept - management of 'Tennis
Edinburgh, Scotland, September, p. 19 Elbow'. Orthopaedic Division Review, May/June: 45-46
Hall T, Cacho T, McNee C, Riches J, Walsh J 2000 Efficacy Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC 2000 Deep and
of the Mulligan SLR Technique. In: Singer KP (ed) superficial fibres of multifidus are controlled
Proceedings of the 7th Scientific Conference of the independently during arm movements. In: Singer KP (ed)
IFOMT in conjunction with the Biennial Conference of Proceedings of the 7th Scientific Conference of the
the MPAA. Perth, Australia, 9-10 November, pp 185-109 IFOMT in conjunction with the Biennial Conference of
Herzog W, Conway PJ, Zhang YT, Gal J, Guimaraes ACS the MPAA. Perth, Australia, 9-10 November, p. 127
1995 Reflex responses associated with manipulative Mulligan BR 1993 Mobilisations with movement. Journal of
treatments on the thoracic spine: a pilot study. Journal Manual & Manipulative Therapy 1(4): 154-156
of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics 18(4): Mulligan BR 1994 Spinal mobilisations with arm movement
233-236 (further mobilisations with movement). The Journal of
Hetherington B 1996 Case Study: Lateral Ligament strains Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2(2): 75-77
of the ankle, do they exist? Manual Therapy 1(5): Mulligan BR 1995 Spinal mobilisations with leg movement
274-275 (further mobilisations with movement). The Journal of
Manual and Manipulative Therapy 3(1): 25-27
THE MULLIGAN CONCEPT: ITS APPLICATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL CONDITIONS 185
Mulligan BR 1999 Manual therapy "Nags", "Snags", Vicenzino B 1995 An investigation of the effects of spinal
"MWMs" etc., 4th edn. Plane View Services, Wellington, manual therapy on the forequarter pressure and thermal
New Zealand pain thresholds and sympathetic nervous system activity
Murphy BA, Dawson NJ, Slack JR 1995 Sacroiliac joint in asymptomatic subjects: a preliminary report. In:
manipulation decreases the H-reflex. Electromyography Shacklock M (ed) Moving in on Pain.
and Clinical Neurophysiology 35: 87-94 Butterworth-Heinnemann, Sydney, pp 185-193
O'Brien T, Vicenzino B 1998 A study of the effects of Vicenzino B, Wright A 1995 Effects of a novel manipulative
Mulligan's mobilisation with movement treatment of physiotherapy technique on tennis elbow: a single case
lateral ankle pain using a case study design. Manual study. Manual Therapy 1(1): 30-35
Therapy 3(2): 78-84 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A 1996 The initial effects of a
O'Sullivan P 2000 Lumbar segmental instability: clinical cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on
presentation and specific stabilizing exercise the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia. Pain
management. Manual Therapy 5(1): 2-12 68: 69-74
Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Mineuet M 1991 Vicenzino B, Buratowski S, Wright A 2000 A preliminary
Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with study of the initial hypoalgesic effect of a mobilisation
cervical spine pain. Archives of Physical Medicine with movement treatment for lateral epicondylalgia. In:
Rehabilitation 72: 288 Singer KP (ed) Proceedings of the 7th Scientific
Sabbahi MA, Fox AM, Druffle C 1990 Do joint receptors Conference of the IFOMT in conjunction with the
modulate the motoneuron excitability? Electromyography Biennial Conference of the MPAA. Perth, Australia, 9-10
and Clinical Neurophysiology 30: 387-396 November, pp 460-464
Sahrmann SA 2002 Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Wilson E 1994 Peripheral joint mobilisation with movement
Impairment Syndromes. Mosby, St Louis and its effects on adverse neural tension. Manipulative
Taylor M, Suvinen T, Rheade P 1994 The effect of Grade 4 Therapist 26(2): 35-40
distraction mobilisation on patients with Wilson E 1995 Mobilisation with movement and adverse
temporomandibular pain-dysfunction disorder. neural tension: an exploration of possible links.
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 10: 129-136 Manipulative Therapist 27(1): 40-46
Thabe H 1986 EMG as a tool to document diagnostic Wilson E 1997 Central facilitation and remote effects:
findings and therapeutic results associated with somatic treating both ends of the system. Manual Therapy 2(2):
dysfunctions in the upper cervical spinal joints and 165-168
sacroiliac joints. Manual Medicine 2: 53-58 Wilson E 200Hhe Mulligan Concept: NAGS, SNAGS, and
Travell JG, Simons DG 1992 Myofascial Pain and mobilisations with movement. Journal of Bodywork and
Dysfunction. The Trigger Point Manual. The Lower Movement Therapies 5(2): 81-89
Extremities, Vol 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp
186-213
186 GENERAL
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 188
188
The role of
Factors influencing the risk of fracture
187
188 GENERAL
Lumbar spine
Reference database
1.3
B 1.1
M 0.9
D
0.7
0.5
0.3 '---'----'---'_-'---I....J
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Age
Region BMD T Z
-- --
N/A
L2 0.642 -3.51 62% -2.76 68%
L3 0.709 -3.41 65% -2.62 71%
L4 0.811 -2.77 73% -1.96 79%
L2- L4 0.729 -3.18 68% -2.40 73%
Figure 14.2 Results from a DXA scan of the lumbar spine of a 51-year-old woman showing the absolute bone density as
well as T- and Z-scores. Since she has a T-score of -3.18 for the L2-4 she is considered to have osteoporosis at this
site. A Z-score of -2.4 indicates that she also has lower bone density compared with her peers.
Table 14.2 Diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis (World depends on several factors including the age of
Health Organization 1994)
the patient, severity of the condition, DXA results,
Classification OXA result co-existing pathologies, functional status and rea
sons for consultation. Specific questioning for
Normal Normal BMO greater than 1 standard
osteoporosis is shown in Table 14.3. There are a
deviation (SO) below the mean of young
adults (T-score >-1) number of reliable and standardized measure
ment tools that can be used to gain a more accu
Osteopenia BMO between 1 and 2.5 SO below the
rate assessment of the patient's needs. The
mean of young adults (T-score -1 to -2.5)
following section describes the key assessment
Osteoporosis BMO more than 2 .5 SD below the mean procedures including those outlined in the excel
of young adults (T-score s-2.5)
lent guidelines developed by Gisela Creed and
Severe or BMO more than 2.5 SO below the mean Sarah Mitchell for the UK Chartered Society of
established of young adults plus one or more Physiotherapy (1999).
osteoporosis fragility fractures
Table 14.3 Relevant questions for subjective assessment in the area of bone health.
Fracture Site
When?
Related to minimal trauma?
Medical history Particularly with relation to risk factors including ovariectomy, eating disorder,
endocrine disorder
Medication Current or past especi ally long-term steroids, hormone replacement therapy,
bisphosphonates
Smoking habits Number of cigarettes per day and number of years smoked currently or in past
BALANCE
Depending on the person's functional level, reli
able and valid measures include: (i) aspects of the
clinical test of sensory interaction of balance
(Shumway-Cook & Horak 1986; Cohen et a11993)
where the longest duration that the person can
balance under different test conditions (eyes
open/ closed, standing on floor / foam) is timed;
(ii) step test (Hill et a11996) where the number of
times the person can place the foot onto and off a
step (7.5 orIS cm high) in aIS-second period is
counted; (iii) functional reach (Duncan et aI1990),
which measures the maximal anterior-posterior
distance that the person can reach in standing
with the arm outstretched (Fig. 14.4).
','
The mechanisms for bone adaptation are not into the later years. In addition, it appears that
entirely clear, but it is thought that mechanical childhood exercise stimulates the bone modelling
strains sensed by bone are transduced into a cel process, expanding the bone size to produce a
lular signal. This signal is then compared with larger, possibly stronger bone (Haapasalo et al
'optimal' strain for that particular bone site.lf the 1996; Bradney et al 1998). This phenomenon is
bone strain is above or below the optimal range, generally not possible once growth has ceased.
then a skeletal remodelling or modelling response Skeletal exercise effects are not confined to
occurs. This concept proposed by Frost (1988) is healthy children. Exercise programmes in paed
known as the 'mechanostat theory'. iatric populations with disability, such as cerebral
palsy, have led to improvements in bone density
(Chad et aI1999).
The skeletal effects of exercise at
There seems to be increasing evidence in
different ages
favour of a fairly narrow critical period in child
It is presently thought that exercise in childhood hood, probably determined by sexual matura
and adolescence produces much higher gains in tion, where activity has a maximal positive effect
bone mass than does exercise in adulthood. on rapidly growing bone. This critical period
Unilateral loading studies involving adult appears to be in the peri-pubertal years (Tanner
female tennis and squash players showed that stage II and III) rather than the pre-pubertal
the beneficial effects on bone mineral acquisition years (Tanner stage I) but further research is
and geometric adaptation were in the order of required as current data conflict somewhat (Bass
two to three times greater if the playing career et a11998; Haapasalo et al 1998). Certainly the
was started before menarche (Kannus et a11995; skeleton is less responsive after menarche
Haapasalo et aI1996). Retrospective studies in (Witzke & Snow 2000; Heinonen et al 2000). A
adult cohorts have reported that lifetime physi supervised 9-month programme of step aerobics
cal activity, especially during childhood, is asso and jumps produced significant increases in bone
ciated with greater bone mass in adult females mass in pre-menarcheal but not post-menarcheal
(McCulloch et a11990; Cooper et a11995; Khan girls (Heinonen et al 2000)
et aI1998). It is unknown whether skeletal gains can be
There are an increasing number of studies eval maintained into the elderly years when fractures
uating the effects of mechanical loading during occur as no long-term exercise intervention study
growth. Cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort following children over this time has been carried
studies show greater bone mass in physically out. Evidence to suggest that this is possible
active children than in less-active controls comes from the site-specific higher bone density
(Slemenda et al 1991; McCulloch et al 1992; related to unique loading patterns reported in
Grimston et a11993; Bailey et a11999; Lehtonen retired athletes (Kirchner et al 1996; Bass et al
Veromaa et al 2000). In intensely training elite ath 1998) and from exercise detraining studies
letes, such as gymnasts and weightlifters, the (Kontulainen et al 1999). However, this issue is
increases in bone mass can be as high as 30-80% still unresolved as recent authors have suggested
(Conroy et a11993; Bass et aI1998). Intervention a gradual diminution of exercise effects over time
studies in pre- and peri-pubertal girls (Morris et (Karlsson et aI2000).
a11997; McKay et al 2000; Heinonen et a12000) To emphasize the importance of exercise dur
and boys (Bradney et al 1998) show that even ing growth is not to deny its importance later in
moderate level� of exercise have skeletal benefits. life. The former is concerned mainly with acqui
In one study, 30 minutes of weight-bearing and sition and the latter mainly with conservation of
muscle-strengthening exercise performed three bone. Exercise in adulthood is especially impor
times per week led to 10% greater increases in tant considering that the adult skeleton is much
bone density (Morris et aI1997). This would be more responsive to the adverse effects of unload
sufficient to halve the risk of fracture if maintained ing than to the beneficial effects of overloading.
196 GENERA L
Attention to lifestyle factors, such as diet, is also In adulthood, exercise must be continued in
important during this time as the skeletal effects order to maintain exercise-induced BMD levels
appear to be modulated by calcium intake (Dalsky et aI1988). Attrition rates from exercise
(Specker 1996). are high even in supervised clinical trials (Bassey
A recent meta-analysis evaluated the effect of & Ramsdale 1994; Kerschan et aI1998). This rein
exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal forces the importance of developing strategies to
women (Wolff et al 1999). It concluded that ran improve compliance and encourage life-long par
domized controlled trials consistently showed that ticipation in physical activity.
exercise prevented or reversed about 1% of bone loss
per year at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck.
What types of exercise are best for
This was corroborated by other meta-analyses
improving bone strength?
in post-menopausal women (Berard et al 1997;
Kelley 1998) although Berard et al (1997) claimed Different activities will provide bone tissue with
this was confined to the lumbar spine. Much less different strain environments and hence influence
attention has been paid to exercise in men. Results the overall adaptive response. Animal studies
of the small number of trials (n=8) showed that show that maximal skeletal effects are achieved
targeted exercise can cause bone mass gains in the with dynamic loads that are high in magnitude
order of 2.6% at both the spine and hip in men over and rate, and unusual in distribution (Lanyon et
the age of 31 years (Kelley et aI2000). al 1982; O'Connor et al 1982; Rubin & Lanyon
Postmenopausal women do not seem to be as 1984, 1985; Judex & Zernicke 2000). Relatively few
responsive to the same loading stimulus as pre loading cycles are necessary (Umemura et aI1997).
menopausal women. In a comparative study, 50 It is also known that bone changes are localized to
daily vertical jumps for 5 months produced a 2.8% the areas directly loaded (BenneU et aI1997).
increase in femoral neck BMD in premenopausal In humans, high-impact exercises, which gen
women but no change in postmenopausal women erate ground reaction forces greater than two
(Bassey et aI1998). Based on the mechanostat the times body weight, are more osteogenic than low
ory, it has been proposed that oestrogen deficien impact exercises (Bassey & Ramsdale 1994;
cy increases the set points for the optimal strain Heinonen et al 1996; Heinonen et al 1998). In a
range. Thus a greater loading stimulus is needed 8-12 month longitudinal study of well-trained
for bone adaptation than in an oestrogen-replete females, gymnasts showed greater increases in
state (Dalsky 1990). spinal and femoral neck bone density than did
Since exercise immediately following runners, swimmers and controls (Taaffe et al
menopause does not prevent the rapid bone loss 1997). In perimenopausal women, moderate inten
that occurs at this time (Bassey & Ramsdale 1995; sity (70-80% V02 max) endurance exercise
Maddalozzo & Snow 2000), it cannot be recom (cycling, jogging, treadmill walking) prevented
mended as a substitute for hormone replacement bone loss at the femoral neck but not the lumbar
therapy (HRT) (American College of Sports spine while low-intensity callisthenics exercise
Medicine 1995). However, a combination of exer was ineffective (Heinonen et al 1998). Exercise
cise and HRT appears to provide greater skeletal programmes reported in the literature have
benefits than HRT alone (Kohrt et aI1995). included various combinations of stair-climbing,
A small number of studies have evaluated the aerobics, skipping, jumping, sprinting, dancing
effect of exercise in women with diagnosed and jogging.
osteopenia (Bravo et aI1996; Hartard et a11996) Since lean mass (Flicker et a11995; Young et al
or osteoporosis (Preisinger et a11996; Malmros et 1995) and muscle strength (Madsen et a11993) are
aI1998). W hile the emphasis in these groups is on positively correlated with bone density, weight
preventing falls, improving function and reduc training has been advocated for skeletal health. In
ing pain, exercise has been shown to conserve premenopausal women, weight training has been
bone density. shown to be of benefit at the lumbar spine
THE ROLE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS 197
(Gleeson et al 1990; Snow-Harter et al 1992; results of walking trials have not demonstrated
Lohmann et aI1995), with a magnitude of effect significant effects at the spine or hip (Hatori et al
similar to that gained with running (Snow-Harter 1993; Martin & Notelovitz 1993; Ebrahim et al
et aI1992). Conversely, a study by Rockwell et al 1997; Humphries et aI2000). This may relate to the
(1990) reported a 4% loss of vertebral bone miner fact that walking imparts relatively low magni
al in 36-year-old women undertaking a mild tude, repetitive and customary strain to the skele
weight-training intervention. This apparent detri ton. While walking has numerous health benefits,
mental effect could be due to the non-randomized some of which may influence fracture risk, it
design, small sample size, differences in baseline should not be prescribed as the exercise of choice
bone turnover levels and timing of measurements. for skeletal loading in healthy ambulant individ
The benefits of weight training for the hip region uals. Whether walking is effective in those with
are unclear (Snow-Harter et aI1992; Lohmann et restricted mobility is yet to be researched.
aI1995), although a significant improvement in Non-weight-bearing activities, such as cycling
bone density at the trochanter was seen following and swimming, do not stimulate bone adaptation
an 18-month programme (Lohmann et aI1995). despite increases in muscle strength (Orwoll et al
Loss of muscle mass and strength with age is 1989; Rico et a11993; Taaffe et aI1995). This sug
well documented, especially after the sixth decade gests that these activities do not generate sufficient
(Harries & Bassey 1990; Rutherford & Jones 1992). strain to reach the threshold for bone adaptation.
Maintenance of strength throughout the lifespan
is associated with a reduced prevalence of func
Exercise dosage
tional limitations (Brill et al 2000). Progressive
weight training even in the frail elderly can lead The exact exercise dose required for maximal
to large strength gains (Fiatarone et al 1990). skeletal effects is not yet known. For an elderly or
Skeletal benefits of weight training in healthy previously sedentary population, exercise should
postmenopausal women have been reported by be gradually introduced to minimize fatigue and
some authors (Nelson et a11994; Kerr et a11996) prevent soreness (Forwood & Larsen 2000).
but not others (Pruitt et al 1992; Nichols et aI1995), Exercise should be performed 2-3 times per week.
which may relate partly to the type of exercise reg Animal studies suggest that this is as effective for
imen. In an elegant unilateral exercise study, Kerr bone as daily loading (Raab-Cullen et aI1994).
et al (1996) compared two strength-training For aerobic exercise, sessions should last
regimes that differed in the number of repetitions between 15 and 60 min. The average conditioning
and the weight lifted. The strength programme intensity recommended for adults without fragil
(high loads, low repetitions) significantly ity fractures is between 70% and 80% of their func
increased bone density at the hip and forearm tional capacity. Individuals with a low functional
sites whereas the end urance programme (low capacity may initiate a programme at 40-60%
loads, high repetitions) had no effect. Weight train (Forwood & Larsen 2000).
ing has also been shown to increase bone density Adults commencing a weight-training pro
in men (Ryan et a11994) and to conserve bone in gramme may perform a few weeks of familiariza
women with osteoporosis and osteopenia tion (Kerr et al 1996) followed by a single set of
(Hartard et aI1996). 8-10 repetitions at an intensity of 40-60% of lRM.
Walking is frequently recommended in clinical This can be progressed to 80%, even in the very
practice to maintain skeletal integrity but contro elderly (Fiatorone et a11994; American College of
versy exists in the literature regarding its effcacy. Sports Medicine 1998). In a study of post
Hatori et al (1993) found that 30 minutes of fast menopausal women with diagnosed osteopenia,
walking (7.2 km/h), performed three times a week strength training at 70% lRM was safe and effec
at an intensity above the anaerobic threshold, tive for maintaining hip and spine bone mass
increased spinal bone density. Slower walking (6.2 (Hartard et aI1996). Programmes should include
km/h) was ineffective. In general, however, the 8-10 exercises involving the major muscle groups.
198 GENERAL
Supervision, particularly in the beginning, with Table 14.4 Exercises which may be included in a
weight-training programme for healthy adults.
attention to safe lifting technique is paramount.
Periodic progression of exercise dosage is need Weight-training exercises
ed otherwise bone adaptation will cease.
Biceps curl
Increasing the intensity or weight bearing is more •
• Overhead press
effective than increasing the duration of the exer • Wrist curl
cise. A periodic increase in a step-like fashion may • Reverse wrist curl
Triceps extension
be better than progression in a linear fashion •
• Forearm pronation/supination
(Forwood & Larsen 2000). Nevertheless, there • Bench press
comes a point where gains in bone mass will slow • Leg press
Half squats
and eventually plateau. This is because each per •
• Hip abduction/adduction
son has an individual biological ceiling that deter • Hamstring curl
mines the extent of a possible training effect • Hip flexion
Hip extension
(American College of Sports Medicine 1995). •
I
I I
No
Yes
(T-score <-1)
I I
Low-risk
Does the patient have a
vigorous exercise
traumatic fracture and/or
programme - high impact,
osteoporosis?
variety of modes
I
I I
No
Yes
T-score <-1 SD
T-score <-215 SD
T-score >-2.5 SD
I I
High-risk
Moderate-risk
modified and supervised
modified exercise
exercise programme - low
programme - low impact,
impact, falls prevention,
falls prevention, posture,
function, reduce pain,
education
education, mobility
Figure 14.5 Devising an exercise programme based on DXA determined fracture risk. A dapted from
Forwood and Larsen (2000).
associated with a reduced risk of vertebral defor required to assist with maintenance of correct pos
mity (Chow & Harrison 1987; Silman et aI1997). ture and for pain relief. Advice can be given about
Land or water exercises can be designed to correct ways to lift as well as correct posture dur
encourage diaphragmatic breathing, strengthen ing standing, lying, sitting and bending.
the hip, back and neck extensors and scapula
retractors, and stretch the major upper and lower
FALLS REDUCTION
limb muscles (Bravo et a11997; Chartered Society
of Physiotherapy 1999). Postural re-education and In elderly individuals or where falls risk factors
dynamic stabilization for the trunk and limb gir have been identified, treatment should be direct
dles are particularly important to normalize ed towards reducing falls and their consequences.
mechanical forces (Figs 14.6 & 14.7). Stronger back Patients who report multiple falls may benefit
extensors have been shown to be related to small from referral to a falls clinic or to medical special
er thoracic kyphosis (Sinaki et aI1996). Patients ists for further evaluation and multi-faceted inter
can be advised to spend time lying in prone or ventions. Such interventions may be effective in
prone on elbows to stimulate thoracic extension. reducing fall frequency (Tinetti et a11994) depend
Postural taping (Fig. 14.8) or bracing may be ing upon the programme and setting (McMurdo
200 GENERA L
Figure 14.6 Hip extension exercises using a ball assist with trunk and pelvic stability.
et al 2000). Home hazard modification may be 1996; Preisinger et a11996) and with established
required often in consultation with an occupational osteoporosis (Malmros et aI1998). In a random
therapist. Consideration should be given to pre ized, controlled trial of 53 women with spinal
scription of gait aids and external hip protectors in crush fracture and back pain, a 10-week physio
appropriate patients. Hip protectors have been therapy programme consisting of balance training,
shown to attenuate fall impact (Parkkari et a11995, muscle strengthening and lumbar stabilization
1997) and to halve the incidence of hip fractures in exercises, was effective in decreasing analgesic use
institutionalized older persons (Lauritzen et al and back pain and increasing quality of life and
1993). Specific deficits, such as restrictions in range level of daily function (Malmros et aI1998).
of ankle dorsiflexion, can be improved through Hydrotherapy may be beneficial due to the
therapist techniques or self-stretches. heat and unloading effects (Bravo et a11997) and
There are numerous studies demonstrating the is particularly useful for building patient confi
positive effect of various forms of land and water dence prior to commencing a land-based exercise
based exercise on balance and strength deficits in programme. Other pain-relieving techniques
elderly individuals (McMurdo & Rennie 1993; include ice, hot packs, soft tissue massage, TENS,
Nelson et a11994; Morganti et a11995; Lord 1996; interferential therapy and shortwave diathermy.
Simmons & Hansen 1996; Bravo et al 1997; Gentle spinal mobilization can be performed even
Kronhed & Moller 1998). However, of the ran in patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia, pro
domized, controlled trials of exercise in older per vided care is taken and techniques well short of
sons using falls as an outcome measure (Reinsch end range are used. However, forceful joint
et a11992; MacRae et a11994; Mulrow et a11994; manipulation is contraindicated. To deal more
Lord et a11995; Wolf et a11996; Buchner et a11997; positively with chronic pain, cognitive and behav
Campbell et al 1997; McMurdo et al 1997; ioural strategies or relaxation techniques may be
Campbell et aI1999), only a few report beneficial employed by the physiotherapist.
exercise effects. The effective exercise programmes
included T'ai Chi (Wolf et al 1996) and physio
EDUCATION
therapy-prescribed combined lower limb strength
ening and balance training (Buchner et al 1997; A large part of the physiotherapist's role is to pro
Campbell et a11997, 1999). The fact that other stud vide osteoporosis education and to empower the
ies have failed to show significant results may be individual to take control of the condition. In
partly due to differences in exercise dimensions many cases, patients may be anxious and require
(type, duration, frequency and intensity), popula reassurance and advice about safe activities.
tions studied and falls definition. Information about lifestyle behaviours such as
At this stage, no definitive exercise prescription diet and smoking should be provided and there is
guidelines to prevent falls can be made on the an abundance of printed literature and web sites
basis of published studies. However, there is suf available for this purpose. The provision of edu
ficient evidence to recommend a broad-based cational material has been shown to change such
exercise programme comprising balance training, behaviours in premenopausal women Gamal et al
resistive exercise, walking and weight-transfer as 1999). Physiotherapists should continually update
part of a multi-faceted intervention to address all their knowledge about self-help groups, commu
falls risk factors (Khan et al 2001). nity programmes, and reputable gymnasiums and
exercise classes in the local area. Osteoporosis
organizations are found in many countries and
PAIN-RELIEVING TECHNIQUES
states and provide a range of useful services and
Exercise has been shown to reduce back pain and resources. The physiotherapist may need to liaise
improve psychological well-being in post with other medical and health professionals for
menopausal women with osteopenia (Bravo et al overall patient care.
202 GENERAL
REFERENCES
American College of Sports Medicine 1 995 Position stand bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Australian
on osteoporosis and exercise. Medicine and Science in Journal of Physiotherapy 44: 1 75-1 80
Sports and Exercise 27: i-vii Berard A, Bravo G, Gauthier P 1 997 Meta-analysis of the
Arnaud SB, Sherrard DJ, Maloney N, Whalen RT, Fung P effectiveness of physical activity for the prevention of
1 992 Effects of 1 -week head-down tilt bed rest on bone loss in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis
bone formation and the calcium endocrine system. International 7: 331-337
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 63: 1 4-20 Blake GM, Fogelman I 1 998 Applications of bone
Bailey DA 1 997 The Saskatchewan paediatric bone mineral densitometry for osteoporosis. Endocrinology and
accrual study-bone mineral acquisition during the Metabolism Clinics of North America 27: 267-288
growing years. International Journal of Sports Medicine Bradney M, Pearce G , Naughton G et al 1 998 Moderate
1 8: S1 91-1 94 exercise during growth i n prepubertal boys - changes
Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PRE, Faulkner in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone
RA 1 999 A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship strength - a controlled prospective study. Journal of
of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing Bone and Mineral Research 1 3: 1 81 4-1 821
children: The University of Saskatchewan bone mineral Bravo G, Gauthier P, Roy PM et al 1 996 Impact of a 1 2-
accrual study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research month exercise programme on the physical and
1 4: 1 672-1 679 psychological health of osteopenic women. Journal of
Bass S, Pearce G, Bradney M, Hendrich E, Delmas PD, the American Geriatrics Society 44: 756-762
Harding A, Seeman E 1 998 Exercise before puberty Bravo G, Gauthier P, Roy P, Payetter H, Gaulin P 1 997 A
may confer residual benefits in bone density in weight-bearing, water-based exercise programme for
adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired osteopenic women: its impact on bone, functional
female gymnasts. Journal of Bone and Mineral fitness, and well-being. Archives of Physical Medicine
Research 1 3: 500-507 and Rehabilitation 78: 1 375-1380
Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ 1 994 Increase in femoral bone Brill PA, Macera CA, Davis DR, Blair SN, Gordon N 2000
density in young women following high impact exercise. Muscular strength and physical function. Medicine and
Osteoporosis I nternational 4: 72-75 Science in Sports and Exercise 32: 4 1 2-41 6
Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ 1 995 Weight-bearing exercise Buchner DM, Cress ME, d e Lateur BJ et al 1 997 The effect
and ground reaction forces - a 1 2-month randomized of strength and endurance training on gait, balance, fall
controlled trial of effects on bone mineral density in risk, and health services use in community-living older
healthy postmenopausal women. Bone 1 6: 469-476 adults. Journal of Gerontology 52: M21 8-M224
Bassey EJ, Rothwell MC, Littlewood JJ, Pye DW 1 998 Pre Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF 1 989 Risk factors for
and postmenopausal women have different bone falls in a community-based prospective study of people
mineral density responses to the same high-impact 70 years and older. Journal of Gerontology 44:
exercise. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1 3: M1 1 2-1 1 7
1 805-1 8 1 3 Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN,
Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Wang J, Pierson R N Jr, Buchner DM 1 999 Falls prevention over 2 years: a
Schwartz E 1 999 Continuous loss of bone during randomized controlled trial in women 80 years and
chronic immobilization: a monozygotic twin study. older. Age and Ageing 28: 5 1 3-51 8
Osteoporosis International 1 0: 1 23-1 27 Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner M M , Norton RN,
Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Khan KM et al 1 997 Bone mass Tilyard MW, Buchner DM 1 997 Randomised controlled
and bone turnover in power athletes, endurance trial of a general practice programme of home based
athletes and controls: a 1 2-month longitudinal study. exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. British
Bone 20: 477-484 Medical Journal 3 1 5 : 1 065-1 069
Bennell K, Talbot R, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly D Chad KE, Bailey DA, McKay HA, Zello GA, Snyder RE 1 999
1 998 Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight- The effect of a weight-bearing physical activity
THE ROLE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS 203
programme on bone mineral content and estimated Flicker L, Hopper JL, Rodgers L, Kaymakci B, Green RM,
volumetric density in children with spastic cerebral Wark JO 1 995 Bone density determinants in elderly
palsy. Journal of Pediatrics 1 35 : 1 1 5-1 1 7 women: a twin study. Journal of Bone and Mineral
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy 1 999 Physiotherapy Research 1 0: 1 607-1 61 3
Guidelines for the Management of Osteoporosis. Forwood M, Larsen J 2000 Exercise recommendations for
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, London osteoporosis: a position statement for the Australian and
Chow RK, Harrison JE 1 987 Relationship of kyphosis to New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society. Australian
physical fitness and bone mass on post-menopausal Family Physician 29: 761 -764
women. American Journal of Physical Medicine 66: Frost HM 1 988 Vital biomechanics: proposed general
2 1 9-227 concepts for skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage.
Cohen H, Blatchly C, Gombash L 1 993 A study of the Calcified Tissue International 42: 1 45-1 56
clinical test of sensory interaction and balance. Physical Gleeson P, Protas E, LeBlanc A, Schneider V, Evans H 1 990
Therapy 73: 346-351 Effects of weight lifting on bone mineral density in
Conroy BP, Kraemer WJ, Maresh CM et al 1 993 Bone mineral premenopausal women. Journal of Bone and Mineral
density in elite junior Olympic weight lifters. Medicine and Research 5: 1 53-1 58
Science in Sports and Exercise 25: 1 1 03-1 1 09 Gordon CC, Cameron Chumlea WC, Roche AF 1 991
Consensus Development Conference 1 993 Diagnosis, Stature, recumbent length, and weight. In: Lohman TG,
prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. American Roche AF, Martorell R (eds) Anthropometric
Journal of Medicine 94: 646-650 Standardization Reference Manual, Abridged Edition.
Cooper C, Cawley M, Bhalla A, Egger P, Ring F, Morton L, Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 3-8
Barker 0 1 995 Childhood growth, physical activity and Greendale GA, Barrettconnor E, Ingles S, Haile R 1 995 Late
peak bone mass in women. Journal of Bone and Mineral physical and functional effects of osteoporotic fracture
Research 1 0: 940-947 in women the Rancho Bernado study. Journal of the
Cooper C, Melton L 1 992 Epidemiology of osteoporosis. American Geriatrics Society 43: 955-961
Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 3: 224-229 Grimston SK, Willows NO, Hanley DA 1 993 Mechanical
Crawford HJ, Jull GA 1 993 The influence of thoracic loading regime and its relationship to bone mineral
posture and movement on range of arm elevation. density in children. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Physiothf:rapy Theory and Practice 9: 1 43-1 48 Exercise 25: 1 203-1 2 1 0
Cummings SR, Black OM, Nevitt MC et al 1 993 Bone Haapasalo H, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al 1 998 Effect of
density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of
Lancet 341 : 72-75 female junior tennis players. Journal of Bone and
Cutler WB, Friedmann E, Genovese-Stone E 1 993 Mineral Research 1 3: 31 0-31 9
Prevalence of kyphosis in a healthy sample of pre- and Haapasalo H , Sievanen H , Kannus P, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori
postmenopausal women. American Journal of PhYSical I 1 996 Dimensions and estimated mechanical charac
Medicine & Rehabilitation 72: 21 9-225 teristics of the humerus after long-term tennis loading.
Dalsky GP 1 990 Effect of exercise on bone: permissive Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1 1 : 864-872
influence oestrogen and calcium. Medicine and Science Hageman P, Blanke 1 986 Comparison of gait of young
in Sports and Exercise 22: 281-285 women and elderly women. Physical Therapy 66:
Dalsky GP, Stocke KS, Ehansi AA, Slatopolsky E, Lee WC, 1 382-1387
Birge SJ 1 988 Weight-bearing exercise training and Harries UJ, Bassey EJ 1 990 Torque-velocity relationships
lumbar bone mineral content in postmenopausal for the knee extensors in women in their 3rd and 7th
women. Annals of Internal Medicine 1 08: 824-828 decades. European Journal of Applied Physiology 60:
Drinkwater BL, Nilson K, Chesnut III CH, Bremner WJ, 1 87-1 90
Shainholtz S, Southworth MB 1 984 Bone mineral Hartard M, Haber P, Ilieva 0, Preisinger E, Seidl G, Huber J
content of amenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes. The 1 996 Systematic strength training as a model of
New England Journal of Medicine 31 1 5: 277-281 therapeutic intervention. American Journal of Physical
Duncan P, Weiner K, Chandler J, Studenski S 1 990 Medicine and Rehabilitation 75: 2 1 -28
Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. Hatori M, Hasegawa A, Adachi H et al 1 993 The effects of
Journal of Gerontology 45: M 1 92-1 97 walking at the anaerobic threshold level on vertebral
Ebrahim S, Thompson P, Baskaran V, Evans K 1 997 bone loss in postmenopausal women. Calcified Tissue
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of brisk walking in International 52: 41 1 -41 4
the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Age Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievanen H et al 1 996 Randomised,
and Ageing 26: 253-260 controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on
Ensrud KE, Black OM, Harris F, Ettinger B, Cummings SR selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Lancet
1 997 Correlates of kyphosis in older women. Journal of 348: 1 343-1 347
the American Geriatrics Society 45: 682-687 Heinonen A, Oja P, Sievanen H, Pasanen M, Vuori 1 1 998
Fiatarone M, Marks E, Ryan N, Meredith C, Lipstitz L, Evans Effect of two training regimens on bone mineral density in
W 1 990 High-intensity training in nonagenarians. Journal healthy peri menopausal women: a randomised, controlled
of the American Medical Association 263: 3029-3034 trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1 3 : 483-490
Fiatorone MA, 0' Neill EF, Ryan NO et al 1 994 Exercise Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Oja P, Pasanen M,
training and nutritional supplementation for physical Vuori I 2000 High-impact exercise and bones of growing
frailty in very elderly people. New England Journal of girls. A 9-month controlled trial. Calcified Tissue
Medicine 330: 1 769-1 775 I nternational Osteoporosis Int 1 1 (1 2): 1 01 0-1 7
204 GENERA L
Helmes E, Hodsman A, Lazowski ° et al 1 995 A ballet classes undertaken at age 1 0 to 1 2 years are
questionnaire to evaluate disability in osteoporotic associated with augmented hip bone mineral density in
patients with vertebral compression fractures. Journals later life. Osteoporosis International 8: 1 65-1 73
of Gerontology Series A - Biological Sciences and Khan K, McKay H , Kannus P, Bailey 0, Wark J, Bennell K
Medical Sciences 50: M91 -M98 2001 Physical Activity and Bone Health. Human
Hill K, Bernhardt J, McGann A, Maltese 0, Berkovits ° 1 996 Kinetics, Champaign, III, USA, pp1 8 1 - 1 98
A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke Kirchner EM, Lewis RD, O'Connor PJ 1 996 Effect of past
patients: reliability, validity, and comparison with healthy gymnastics participation on adult bone mass. Journal of
elderly. Physiotherapy Canada 48: 257-262 Applied Physiology 80: 226-232
Hill K, Schwarz J, Flicker L, Carroll S 1 999 Falls among Kohrt W, Snead 0, Slatopolsky E, Birge SJ 1 995 Additive
healthy, community-dwelling, older women: a effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone
prospective study of frequency, circumstances, mineral density in older women. Journal of Bone and
consequences and prediction accuracy. Australian and Mineral Research 1 0: 1 302-1 31 1
New Zealand Journal of Public Health 23: 41 -48 Kontulainen S, Kannus P, Haapasalo H et al 1 999 Changes
Huda W, Morin RL 1 996 Patient doses in bone mineral in bone mineral content with decreased training in
dosimetry. British Journal of Radiology 69: 422-425 competitive young adult tennis players and controls: a
Humphries B, Newton RU, Bronks R et al 2000 Effect of prospective 4-yr follow-up. Medicine and Science in
exercise intensity on bone density, strength, and calcium Sports and Exercise 31 : 646-652
turnover in older women. Medicine and Science in Kronhed A, Moller M 1 998 Effects of physical exercise on
Sports and Exercise 32: 1 043-1050 bone mass, balance skill and aerobic capacity in women
Jamal SA, Ridout R, Chase C, Fielding L, Rubin LA, Hawker and men with low bone mineral density, after one year of
GA 1 999 Bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis training - a prospective study. Scandinavian Journal of
education improve lifestyle behaviors in premenopausal Medicine and Science in Sports 8: 290-298
women: a prospective study. Journal of Bone and Kujala U M , Kaprio J, Kannus P, Sarna S, Koskenvuo M
Mineral Research 1 4: 2 1 43-21 49 2000 Physical activity and osteoporotic hip fracture risk
Joakimsen RM, Fonnebo V, Magnus J H , Stormer J, Tollan in men. Archives of Internal Medicine 1 60: 705-708
A, Sogaard AJ 1 999 The Truomso study - physical Lanyon LE, Goodship AE, Pye CJ, MacFie JH 1 982
activity and the incidence of fractures in a middle-aged Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling. Journal of
population. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1 3: Biomechanics 1 5: 1 41 -1 54
1 1 49-1 1 57 Larsen J 1 998 Osteoporosis. I n : Sapsford R, Bullock
Judex S, Zernicke RF 2000 High-impact exercise and Saxton J, Markwell S (eds) Women's Health. A Textbook
growing bone: relation between high strain rates and for Physiotherapists. WB Saunders, London, pp
enhanced bone formation. Journal of Applied Physiology 41 2-453
88: 2 1 83-2 1 91 Laurent MR, Buchanon WW, Bellamy N 1 991 ��ethods of
Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M et al 1 995 Effect of assessment used in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials.
starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the A review. British Journal of Rheumatology 30: 326-329
dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Annals of Lauritzen JB, Petersen MM, Lund B 1 993 Effect of external
Internal Medicine 1 23: 27-31 hip protectors on hip fractures. Lancet 341 : 1 1 -1 3
Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Jarvinen Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Nuotio I, Heinonen OJ,
M 1 999 Hip fractures in Finland between 1 970 and 1 997 Viikari J 2000 Influence of physical activity on ultrasound
and predictions for the future. Lancet 353: 802-805 and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone
Karlsson MK, Linden C, Karlsson C, Johnell 0, Obrant K, measurements in peripubertal girls: a cross-sectional
Seeman E 2000 Exercise during growth and bone study. Calcified Tissue International 66: 248-254
mineral density and fractures in old age. Lancet 355: Lespessailles E, Jullien A, Eynard E et al 1 998
469-470 Biomechanical properties of human os calcanei:
Keen AD, Drinkwater BL 1 997 Irreversible bone loss in relationships with bone density and fractal evaluation of
former amenorrheic athletes. Osteoporosis International bone microarchitecture. Journal of Biomechanics 31 :
7: 31 1 -31 5 81 7-824
Kelley GA 1 998 Exercise and regional bone mineral density Lewis MK, Blake GM, Fogelman I 1 994 Patient dose in dual
in postmenopausal women - a meta-analytic review of X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis International 4:
randomized trials. American Journal of Physical 1 1 -1 5
Medicine and Rehabilitation 77: 76-87 Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei ° et al 1 999 Quality of life in
Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV 2000 Exercise and bone patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality
mineral density in men: a meta-analysis. Journal of of Life questionnaire of the European Foundation for
Applied Physiology 88: 1 730-1 736 Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Osteoporosis International
Kerr 0, Morton A, Dick I, Prince R 1 996 Exercise effects on 1 0: 1 50-1 60
bone mass in postmenopausal women are site-specific Lohmann T, Going S, Pamenter R et al 1 995 Effects of
and load-dependent. Journal of Bone and Mineral resistance training on regional and total bone mineral
Research 1 1 : 2 1 8-225 density in premenopausal women: a randomized
Kerschan K, Alacamlioglu Y, Kollmitzer J et al 1 998 Functional prospective study. Journal of Bone and Mineral
impact of unvarying exercise programme in women after Research 1 0: 1 01 5-1 024
menopause. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Lord S 1 996 The effects of a community exercise
Rehabilitation 77: 326-332 programme on fracture risk factors in older women.
Khan KM, Bennell KL, Hopper JL et al 1 998 Self-reported Osteoporosis International 6: 361-367
THE ROLE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS 205
Lord SR, Clark RD, Webster IW 1 991 Physiological factors McMurdo M ET, Millar AM, Daly F 2000 A randomized
associated with falls in an elderly population. Journal of controlled trial of fall prevention strategies in old
the Geriatrics Society 39: 1 1 94-1200 peoples' homes. Gerontology 46: 83-87
Lord SR, Sambrook PN, Gilbert C et al 1 994 Postural Melzack R 1 975 The McGill pain questionnaire: major
stability, falls and fractures in the elderly: results from properties and scoring methods. Pain 1 : 277-299
the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Medical Micklesfield LK, Reyneke L, Fataar A, Myburgh KH 1 998
Journal of Australia 1 60: 684-691 Long-term restoration of deficits in bone mineral density
Lord SR, Ward JA, Williams P, Strudwick M 1 995 The effect is inadequate in premenopausal women with prior
of a 1 2-month exercise trial on balance, strength, and menstrual irregularity. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
falls in older women: a randomized controlled trial. 8: 1 55-163
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 43: Morganti CM, Nelson ME, Fiatorone MA, Dallal GE,
1 1 98-1206 Economos CD, Crawford BM, Evans WJ 1 995 Strength
Lundon KMA, Li AMW, Bibershtein S 1 998 Interrater and improvements with 1 yr of progressive resistance
intrarater reliability in the measurement of kyphosis in training in older women. Medicine and Science in Sports
postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Spine 23: and Exercise 27: 906-91 2
1 978-1 985 Morris FL, Naughton GA, Gibbs JL, Carlson JS, Wark JD
Lynn SG, Sinaki M, Westerlind KC 1 997 Balance 1 997 Prospective ten-month exercise intervention in
characteristics of persons with osteoporosis. Archives of premenarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78: 273-277 mass. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1 2:
MacRae PG, Feltner ME, Reinsch S 1 994 A 1 -year exercise 1 453-1 462
programme for older women: effects on falls, injuries Mulrow CD, Gerety MB, Kanten 0 et al 1 994 A randomized
and physical performance. Journal of Ageing and trial of physical rehabilitation for very frail nursing home
Physical Activity 2: 1 27-1 42 residents [see comments]. Journal of the American
Maddalozzo GF, Snow CM 2000 High intensity resistance Medical Association 271 : 51 9-524
training: effects on bone in older men and women. Nelson M, Fiatarone M, Morganti C, Trice I, Greenberg R,
Calcified Tissue International 66: 399-404 Evans W 1 994 Effects of high-intensity strength training
Madsen OR, Schaadt 0, Bliddal H, Egsmose C, Sylvest J on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a
1 993 Relc:.tionship between quadriceps strength and randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American
bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and distal Medical Association 272: 1 909-1 9 1 4
forearm in women. Journal of Bone and Mineral Nichols JF, Nelson K P, Sartoris OJ 1 995 Bone mineral
Research 8: 1 439-1444 responses to high-intensity strength training in active older
Malina RM, Spriduso WW, Tate C, Baylor AM 1 978 Age at women. Journal of Ageing and Physical Activity 3: 26-38
menarche and selected menstrual characteristics in O'Connor JA, Lanyon LE, MacFie H 1 982 The influence of
athletes at different competitive levels and in different strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. Journal of
sports. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1 0: Biomechanics 1 5: 767-781
21 8-222 Orwoll ES, Ferar J, Oviatt SK, McClung M, Huntington K
Malmros B, Mortenson L, Jensen MB, Charles P 1 998 1 989 The relationship of swimming exercise to bone
Positive effects of physiotherapy on chronic pain and mass in men and women. Archives of Internal Medicine
performance in osteoporosis. Osteoporosis I nternational 1 49:21 97-2220
8: 21 5-221 Paganini-Hill A, Chao A, Ross RK, Henerson B 1 991
Martin 0, Notelovitz M 1 993 Effects of aerobic training on Exercise and other factors in the prevention of hip
bone mineral density of postmenopausal women. fracture: The Leisure World study. Epidemiology 2 :
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 8: 931 -936 1 6-25
McCulloch RG, Bailey DA, Houston CS, Dodd BL 1 990 Parkkari J, Kannus P, Heikkila J, Poutala J, Heinonen A,
Effects of physical activity, dietary calcium and selected Sievanen H, Vuori I 1 997 Impact experiments of an
lifestyle factors on bone density in young women. external hip protector in young volunteers. Calcified
Canadian Medical Association Journal 1 42 : 221-227 Tissue International 60: 354-357
McCulloch RG, Bailey DA, Whalen RL, Houston CS, Parkkari J, Kannus P, Heikkila J, Poutala J, Sievanen H ,
Faulkner RA, Craven BR 1 992 Bone density and bone Vuori I 1 995 Energy-shunting external h i p protector
mineral content of adolescent soccer athletes and attenuates the peak femoral impact force below the
competitive swimmers. Pediatric Exercise Science 4: theoretical fracture threshold - an in vitro
31 9-330 biomechanical study under falling conditions of the
McKay HA, Petit MA, Schutz RW, Prior JC, Barr SI, Khan elderly. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1 0:
KM 2000 Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density 1 437-1 442
after modified physical education classes: a randomized Parkkari J, Kannus P, Palvanen M et al 1 999 Majority of hip
school-based exercise intervention study in fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the
prepubescent and early pubescent children. Journal of greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled
Pediatrics 1 36: 1 56-1 62 hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.
McMurdo M, Rennie L 1 993 A controlled trial of exercise by Calcified Tissue International 65: 1 83-1 87
residents of old peoples' homes. Age and Ageing 22: Petersen M M , Jensen NC, Gehrchen PM, Nielsen PK,
1 1 -1 5 Nielsen PT 1 996 The relation between trabecular bone
McMurdo ME, Mole PA, Paterson CR 1 997 Controlled trial strength and bone mineral density assessed by dual
of weight bearing exercise in older women in relation to photon and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in the
bone density and falls. British Medical Journal 3 1 4: 22 proximal tibia. Calcified Tissue International 59: 3 1 1 -31 4
206 GENERAL
Tinetti M, Baker D, McAvay G et al 1 994 A multifactorial Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Kutner NG, McNeely E, Coogler C,
intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly Xu T 1 996 Reducing frailty and falls i n older persons: an
people living in the community. New England Journal of investigation of Tai Chi and computerized balance
Medicine 331 : 822-827 training. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 44:
Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF 1 988 Risk factors for 489-497
falls among elderly persons living in the community. Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HCG, Kostense PJ,
New England Journal of Medicine 31 9: 1 701-1 707 Twisk JWR 1 999 The eAect of exercise training
Toshikazu I, Shirado 0, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kanedo K, programmes on bone mass: a meta-analysis of
Strax TE 1 996 Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: published controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal
an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation. women. Osteoporosis International 9: 1 -1 2
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 77: World Health Organization 1 994 Assessment of fracture risk
75-79 and its application to screening for osteoporosis. Report
Umemura Y, Ishiko T, Yamauchi T, Kurono M, Mashiko S of WHO Study Group. World Health Organization,
1 997 Five jumps per day increase bone mass and Geneva, p. 1 29
breaking force in rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Young D, Hopper JL, Nowson CA, et al 1 995
Research 1 2: 1 480-1 485 Determinants of bone mass in 1 0- to 26-year-old
Wark JD 1 998 How to prevent and treat osteoporosis. females: a twin study. Journal of Bone and Mineral
Australian Doctor July: I-VII Research 1 0: 558-567
Witzke KA, Snow CM 2000 Effects of plyometric jump Zmuda JM, Cauley JA, Ferrell RE 1 999 Recent progress in
training on bone mass in adolescent girls. Medicine and understanding the genetic susceptibility to osteoporosis.
Science in Sports and Exercise 32: 1 05 1 -1 057 Genetic Epidemiology 1 6: 356-367
208 GENERAL
THE ROLE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY IN THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS 209
REFERENCES
Burr DB, Robling AG, Turner CH 2002 Effects of biomech Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH 2002 Shorter,
anical stress on bones in animals. Bone 30: 781 -786 more frequent mechanical loading sessions enhance
Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH 2000 Partitioning a daily bone mass. Medicine and Science in Sports and
mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts Exercise 34: 1 96-202
improves the osteogenic response to loading. Journal Umemura Y, Sogo N, Honda A 2002 Effects of intervals
of Bone and Mineral Research 1 5: 1 596-1 602 between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to
Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH 2001 Recovery periods loading. Journal of Applied Physiology 93: 1 345-1348
restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone.
Journal Experimental Biology 204: 3389-3399
210 GENERAL
CHAPTER CONTENTS
Introduction 211
Conclusion 220
disability in chronic low
Postscript 223
back pain patients
J. w. S. Vlaeyen* G. Crombezt
*Department of Medical, Clinical and Experimental
Psy chology, Maastricht University and Pain
Management and Research Centre, University
Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands
tDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health
Psy chology, University of Ghent, Belgium
INTRODUCTION
direct and unique pain pathways from the periph behaviour', which refers to observable signs of
eral nervous system to the brain, in the same way pain and suffering, should be the focus of treat
a bell in the church tower rings when the rope ment. There are at least two assumptions to this
attached to it is being pulled. For Descartes, pain approach. First, the factors that maintain the pain
was a reflex of the mind upon nociceptive stimu problem can be different from those that have
lation of the body. It is considered as a symptom initiated it. Pain behaviours may be subject to
that is isomorphically related to the extent of bod a graded shift from structural/mechanical to
ily damage in the organism. According to this per environmental control. Secondly, biomedical find
spective, pain treatment consists of two acts: (i) ings do not eliminate the possibility that psy
localization of the underlying pathology; and (ii) chological or social factors contribute to the level
removal of the pathology with appropriate reme of pain disability.
dy or cure. In the absence of bodily damage, the After the so-called cognitive revolution in
mind was assumed to be at fault, and psychic behavioural science, Turk et al (1983) emphasized
pathology was inferred. This model has been the role of attributions, efficacy expectations, per
extremely influential. Even today, most medical sonal control and problem-solving within a cog
pain treatments are based on its assumptions. The nitive-behavioural perspective on chronic pain.
limita tions of the biomedical model became The additional assumptions of this approach are
apparent during the late seventies. It became clear as follows. First, individuals actively process
that no absolute relationship exists between the information regarding internal stimuli and exter
amount of tissue damage and the severity of the nal events. Secondly, thoughts and beliefs may
pain experience (e.g. Jensen et aI 1994). alter behaviour by their direct influence on emo
In a nice example of a Kuhnian shift of para tional and physiological responses. Thirdly, indi
digm, the gate-control theory of Melzack and Wall viduals can become active participants in their
(1965) adequately dealt with some of the short treatment if they learn skills to deal with their
comings of the biomedical model. The gate-con problems (Gatchel & Turk 1996). This has now
trol theory has also figuratively opened the gate become the prevailing approach in current chron
for research on the role of psychological variables ic pain management.
moderating and mediating pain. This theory clear
ly stated that cortical processing was involved in
the integration of both sensory-discrirninative and TRIPLE RESPONSE MODE IN
affective-motivational aspects of pain. A revolu CHRONIC PAIN
tionary idea was that pain was not only the result
of nociceptive information ascending from the It is clear that a strict biomedical model of pain is
periphery, but was profoundly moderated by insufficient in explaining the complexity of the
descending pathways that amplify or inhibit noci pain experience. The International Association for
ceptive input in the spinal cord. According to the the Study of Pain (1986) has adopted this per
gate-control theory, the balance between sensory spective and defined pain therefore as 'a sensory
and central inputs determines the presence or and emotional experience associated with actual
absence of pain. or potential tissue damage, or described in terms
About a decade after the publication of the of such damage'. This definition radically breaks
gate-control theory, Fordyce (1976) introduced his with the biomedical model in which pain and tis
influential book Behavioural Methods for Chronic sue damage are almost synonymous. Tissue dam
Pain and Illness. His work stemmed from the obvi age is not even a necessary condition for pain.
ous shortcomings of the attempts of traditional Pain is also considered an emotional experience.
health care to resolve chronic pain problems. In line with this idea, we will further elaborate the
Fordyce was the first to apply the principles of view that pain, just like an emotion, is a multidi
operant conditioning (Skinner 1953) to problems mensional experience. In particular, the three-sys
of chronic pain. Central was the idea that 'pain tems model of emotions will be applied to the
FEAR OF MOVEMENT/(RE)INJURY, AVOIDANCE AND PAIN DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS 21 3
G\
event or pain episode (personally relevant stress).
Of interest was that, as compared to healthy con
trols and patients with medical complaints other
than back pain, the chronic low back pain patients
Psychophysiological •
responded with elevated EMG activity only in the
• Pain behaviours
reactivity lower left paraspinal muscles, but this muscular
reactivity was only observed in the personally rel
Figure 1 5.1 Pain as a hypothetical construct which can evant stress situation. Likewise, patients with
only be inferred by observable psychophysiological
chronic pain in the temporomandibular (cheek)
reactivity, pain cognitions and pain behaviours (based on
Ohman 1987 and Vlaeyen 1991). region responded to personal stress with high EMG
activity in the masseter muscle (involved in chew
ing). In similar situations, patients with headache
experience of pain (Fig. 15.1). According to this responded with an overreactivity in the frontalis
model, emotions are always subjective and never muscle (Flor et al 1992). In other words, psy
observable in themselves. They can only be chophysiological reactivity to personal stressors
inferred by their effects at an observable level. appears to be symptom-specific. This increased
Likewise, (chronic) pain can best be approached muscular reactivity to pain or psychosocial stres
as a hypothetical construct that can be inferred by sors may contribute to a reduced ability to tolerate
at least three partially independent response sys pain, and subsequently to functional limitations
tems: (i) psychophysiological reactivity; (ii) overt and pain disability (Feuerstein 1991). Despite the
pain behaviours; and (iii) attention, attributions existing evidence, the function of response stereo
and expectations (Vlaeyen et aI1989). typy in the initiation or maintenance of chronic
pain is still unclear and poorly researched.
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL
REACTIVITY OVERT PAIN BEHAVIOURS
Like any emotional experience, pain may variably The overt-motoric responses cover a wide range
affect several bodily systems including the mus of gross motor behaviours, referred to in the pain
cular (Fig. 15.2), cardiovascular, respiratory and literature as pain behaviours. Fordyce (1986)
electrodermal systems (see Flor et al 1992 for an demonstrated the clinical and theoretical rele
extensive review). Although some of the psy vance of observable pain behaviours. The impor
chophysiological responses during pain may be tance of assessing pain behaviours lies in the fact
biologically hardwired and relatively specific to that they elicit reinforcing responses from the
pain, psychophysiological reactivity to pain is also social environment, which can maintain these
specific for particular groups of subjects (response behavioural expressions. For example, Lousberg
stereotypy) and is also extremely sensitive to the et al (1990) reported that chronic low back pain
environment in which pain emerges. In particu patients with solicitous spouses reported more
lar, the issue of response stereotypy has attracted pain during a treadmill test than patients with
much research attention. The idea is that stress nonsolicitous spouses. In addition, pain behav
causes an overreactivity in particular physiologi iours are always incompatible with physical activ
cal systems, which may initiate and maintain pain ity. The longer these pain behaviours exist, the
problems. In a well-controlled laboratory study lower activity levels will be which, in turn, may
with chronic low back pain patients, Flor et al worsen the pain problem, as long-standing inac
(1985) measured electromyography (EMG) activ tivity may lead to the so-called disuse or decon
ity of various muscle sites while patients were ditioning syndrome (Fig. 15.3).
214 GENERAL
Personally Catastrophizing
A
relevant
stressor
A
atastrOPhiZing
,
Decreased pain
PAIN M"�I, Palo Reduction
Primary __ ....
.� . Muscle Pain reactivity behaviours distress
stimulus
+
reactivity behaviours Social attention
t
Pathology
Disregulation
activity level
Bodily sensations
+
III • Catastrophizing
consequences, both physically (loss of mobility,
muscle strength and fitness, possibly resulting in
t
8
the 'disuse syndrome') (Bortz 1984; Verbunt et al
2003) and psychologically (loss of self-esteem,
Pathology
Muscle
reactivity
� Pain
behaviours
deprivation of reinforcers, depression, somatic
preoccupation). A ll these consequences may aug
ment disability (Vlaeyen & Linton 2000) .
Figure 1 5.4 Factors that influence catastrophizing beliefs
in chronic musculoskeletal pain.
In 1990, Kori et al introduced the term 'kinesio
phobia' (kinesis movement) for the condition in
=
ment/(re)injury was the most powerful predictor from the muscles of the lower back and lower legs.
in the performance of a simple weight-lifting task, Unexpectedly, paraspinal EMG-activity decreased
and similar findings were reported by Crombez et during video-exposure, rather than increased. The
al (1999) with a knee flexion and extension unit of decrement, however, tended to be substantially less
the Cybex System. These effects of fear also in fearful patients than in the non-fearful patients.
appear to generalize towards other activities of The findings extend the symptom-specificity model
daily life. Asmundson et al (1997) found that of psychophysiological reactivity to the area of
patients classified as 'dysfunctional' with the pain-related fear, and support the idea that pain
Multidimensional Pain Inventory (Kerns et al related fear perpetuates pain and pain disability
1985) reported more pain-related fear than those through muscular reactivity.
classified as 'interpersonally distressed' or as
'adaptive copers'. In the studies by Vlaeyen et al
(1995b) and Crombez et al (1999), pain-related fear SUMMARY
was was strongly associated with self-reported
disability levels, while current pain intensity, bio These studies, as well as the studies by Rose et al
medical findings and general distress were not (1992) and Waddell et al (1993), provide support
predictive of pain disability. for the validity of the pain-related fear concept. It
should be noted, however, that these are cross-sec
tional in nature, leaving the question of whether
PAIN-RELATED FEAR AND
fear of movement/(re)injury is secondary to the
CATASTROPHIZING
experience of LBP, or if it is one of the determi
There is also evidence that pain-related fear is nants of becoming a chronic pain patient. The
associated with catastrophic thinking about pain. recent prospective study by Klenerman et al (1995)
McCracken and Gross (1993) found a strong asso provides support for the latter. They collected
ciation between fear of pain and pain catastro both psychological and biomedical measures from
phizing in chronic pain patients. Similarly, a sample of 300 acute LBP patients within 1 week
Vlaeyen et al (1995a; b) found that in CLBP of presentation, and at 2 months, so as to predict
patients, fear of movement/(re)injury was strong the 12 month outcome. The data showed that sub
ly related to catastrophizing, and the authors sug jects who had not recovered by 2 months (7.3%)
gested that catastrophizing is likely to be a became CLBP patients. Moreover, fear of pain
precursor of pain-related fear. In line with this early on turned out to be one of the most power
idea, Crombez et al (1998a) found that pain-free ful predictors of chronicity. Linton et al (1999)
volunteers with a high frequency of catastrophic included a large sample from the general popula
thinking about pain became more fearful when tion in their prospective cohort study with the aim
threatened with the possibility of occurrence of to examine whether pain catastrophizing and fear
intense pain than students with a low frequency avoidance in pain-free individuals predict subse
of catastrophic thinking. quent episodes of musculoskeletal pain. They
found that individuals who scored above the
median score of a modified version of the Fear
FEAR- INDUCED MUSCULAR
Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) (Waddell
REACTIVITY
et a11993) had twice as much chance of having a
One study has dealt with the question of whether pain episode in the following year.
pain-related fear is associated with muscular reac Based on the findings of recent studies, a
tivity. Vlaeyen et al (1999a) asked 31 CLBP patients biopsychosocial model is proposed (Fig. 15.5)
to watch a neutral nature documentary, followed that represents the mechanisms of how fear of
by a fear-eliciting video-presentation (a dummy movement/(re)injury contributes to the mainte
patient vigorously engaging in heavy physical exer nance of chronic pain disability in CLBP. It begins
cise), while surface EMG recordings were made with the injury occurring during the acute phase.
FEAR OF MOVEMENT/(RE)INJURY, AVOIDANCE AND PAIN DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS 21 7
Injury
Recovery
/
Disuse
/
Depression
Disability
Avoidance
/\
Pain experience
Confrontation
F"'(O'�
Catastrophizing � No fear
Negative affectivity
Anxiety sensitivity
�
NA
t
X information
� Information
PT-patient information
Figure 1 5.5 Theoretical model of pain-related fear as a determinant of CLBP disability. If pain, possibly caused by an
injury, is interpreted as threatening (pain catastrophizing), pain-related fear evolves. This leads to avoidance behaviours,
followed by disability, disuse and depression. The latter will maintain the pain experiences, thereby fuelling the vicious
circle of increasing fear and avoidance. In noncatastrophizing patients, no pain-related fear and rapid confrontation with
daily activities is likely to occur, leading to fast recovery. Pain catastrophizing is hypothesized as the result of the
interaction between negative affectivity (as a personality characteristic) and (threatening) information provided by others,
such as the health-care provider. (Based on Vlaeyen and Linton, 2000, with permission from the International
Association for the Study of Pain, (IASP).
Painful experiences that are intensified during fear. What do we know about the origins of cat
movement, will elicit catastrophizing cognitions astrophizing? On the one hand, there is evidence
in some individuals and more adaptive cognitions that catastrophizing is associated with relatively
in others. Patients who catastrophize are more stable personality traits such as negative affec
likely to become fearful. Fear of tivity (NA). NA reflects a general tendency to
movement/(re)injury subsequently leads to experience subjective distress and dissatisfaction
increased avoidance and, in the long run, to dis (Watson & Clark 1984). High NA subjects are
use, depression and increased disability (Philips hypervigilant, consistently scan their environ
1987; Council et aI1988). Both depression and dis ment for signs of trouble, and interpret ambigu
use are known to be associated with decreasing ous stimuli in a negative and threatening manner
pain tolerance levels (Romano & Turner 1985; (Watson & Pennebaker 1989). Catastrophizing
McQuade et al 1988), and hence promote the may, however, also be influenced by external fac
painful experiences. In addition to the avoidance tors such as the characteristics of the thera
of threatening physical activities, pain disability pist-patient interaction. People in the direct
may also persist because of increased attention environment, including health-care providers,
from others, as well as the avoidance of social con may verbally and nonverbally convey the mes
flicts or responsibilities. In patients with more sage that there might be something dangerously
adaptive cognitions, confrontation rather than wrong with the back. It is likely that this threat
avoidance is likely to occur, promoting health ening information will be incorporated into the
behaviours and early recovery. individual's personal beliefs and convictions.
In the proposed model, pain catastrophizing More generally, studies have demonstrated that
is considered a main precursor of pain-related patient-therapist interaction patterns have an
218 GENERAL
impact on patients' health outcomes (Kaplan et ranted. According to the suggestions made by
aI1989). More likely, however, is that informa Turner (1996) and Von Korff (1996) for behaviour
tion provided by therapists, and how this infor al interventions in primary care, such an inter
mation is perceived by the patient, moderates the vention could be designed in three steps:
influence of NA on catastrophizing. Future stud screening, education and exposure.
ies testing the causality assumed in this model In terms of screening, a number of relatively
need to be carried out. short questionnaries are now available, which
have the potential to identify back pain patients
whose level of disability may be mainly deter
CONSEQUENCES FOR CLINICAL mined by pain-related fear, and not by pain
MANAGEMENT intensity or biomedical status. Examples are the
Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire
What can be the implications of the current find (Linton & Hallden 1996), the Tampa Scale for
ings for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain? Kinesiophobia (TSK) (Kori et al 1990; Vlaeyen
First, clinicians are often requested to make judge et al 1995a, b) or the Fear Avoidance Beliefs
ments about the present and future functional Questionnaire (FABQ) (Waddell et al 1993;
capacity of patients on the basis of dynamometry. Crombez et al 1999). These appear appropriate
The assumption made is that lumbar (isokinetic) for use in a primary care setting as well. In the
dynamometry provides objective and unbiased case of elevated scores, it is worth enquiring about
measures and that it can quantify maximal func the essential stimuli: W hat is the patient actually
tional capacity. Menard et al (1994), for example, afraid of? So far, there is a lack of standardized
found a difference in the pattern of dynamometry tools for identifying these stimuli. In addition to
in two groups of LBP patients who differed only checklists of daily activities, the presentation of
in the propensity of abnormal illness behaviour visual materials, such as pictures of back-stress
(as indicated by the Waddell score), and proposed ing activities and movements, might be worth
that fear of pain of movement might be one of the while (Kugler et al 1999). They can be helpful in
possible explanations. The plausibility of this the development of graded hierarchies. Such a
explanation is corroborated by other studies hierarchy of back-stressing activities reflects the
(Vlaeyen et al 1995a; Crombez et al 1996) in which full range of situations that a patient avoids,
a relation between fear of movement/ (re)injury beginning with those that provoke only mild
and behavioural performance is demonstrated. discomfort, and ending with activities or situa
This means that a valid assessment of functional tions that are well beyond the patient's present
capacity cannot be carried out without controlling abilities. Each situation is then rated by the
for pain-related fear. patient on a 0-100 scale according to the amount
Second, keeping in mind that the relatively of fear it causes (Fig. 15.6). In our experience,
small percentage of chronic back pain patients are abrupt changes in movements (e.g. suddenly
responsible for 75-90% of the societal costs (Van being hit) or activities consisting of repetitive
Tulder et al 1995), the early identification of spinal compressions (e.g. lifting, jumping) are
patients at risk of becoming disabled might lead frequently mentioned stimuli that chronic back
to more specific and preventive interventions, the pain patients fear. These situations are feared
reduction of disability and associated costs because of beliefs about the causes of pain, such
(Linton 1998). Catastrophizing, pain-related fear as ruptured or severely damaged nerves ('If I lift
and fear of movement /(re) injury, in particular, heavy weights, the nerves in my back might be
must be considered such a risk factor. Pain-relat damaged'). Such a screening may also be sup
ed fear may be an essential aspect of a broader plemented by information about the precipitants
early assessment of psychosocial 'yellow flags' (situational or internal) of the pain-related fear,
(Kendall et aI 1997). For this subgroup, an early and about the direct and indirect consequences.
cognitive-behavioural intervention might be war- This screening might also include other areas of
FEAR OF MOVEMENT/(RE)INJURY, AVOIDANCE AND PAIN DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS 219
life stresses, as they might increase arousal lev argument may facilitate behaviour change, but are
els and indirectly fuel pain-related fear. not as effective as direct experiences.
The second step consists of unambiguously Therefore, the third, and probably most essen
educating the patient in such a way that the tial, step consists of graded exposure to the sit
patient views his pain as a common condition that uations the patients has identified as 'dangerous'
can be self-managed, rather than as a serious dis or 'threatening'. Such a cognitive-behavioural
ease or a condition that needs careful protection. approach is always introduced with a careful
Although cognitive-perceptual factors, such as explanation of the fear-avoidance model (Fig.
catastrophizing in particular, are associated with 15.5), using the patient's individual symptoms,
pain-related fear, didactic lectures and rational beliefs and behaviours to illustrate how vicious
Figure 1 5.6 Application of PHODA in a patient with chronic low back pain.
220 GENERAL
REFERENCES
Asmundson GJG, Norton GR, Allerdings MD 1997 Fear and Crombez G, Vervaet l, lysens R, Baeyens F, Eelen P
avoidance in dysfunctional chronic back pain patients. 1998b Avoidance and confrontation of painful, back
Pain 69: 231-236 straining movements in chronic back pain patients.
Beecher HK 1959 Measurement of Subjective Responses. Behaviour Modification 22: 62-77
Oxford University Press, Oxford Crombez G, Vlaeyen JWS, Heuts PHTG, lysens R 1999
Bortz WM 1984 The disuse syndrome. Western Journal of Fear of pain is more disabling than pain itself. Evidence
Medicine 141: 691-694 on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain
Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S 1995 disability. Pain 80: 329-340
Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and Davey GCl 1997 Phobias. A Handbook of Theory,
subchronic low back trouble. Spine 20: 722-728 Research and Treatment. Wiley, Chichester
Ciccone OS, Grzesiak RC 1984 Cognitive dimensions of Davey GCl, Jubb M, Cameron C 1996 Catastrophic worrying
chronic pain. Social Sciences in Medicine 12: as a function of changes in problem-solving confidence.
1339-1345 Cognitive Therapy and Research 20: 333-344
Council JR, Ahern OK, Follick MJ, Kline Cl 1988 Feuerstein M 1991 A multidisciplinary approach to the
Expectancies and functional impairment in chronic low prevention, evaluation, and management of work
back pain. Pain 33: 323-331 disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1: 5-12
Crombez G, Vervaet l, lysens R, Eelen P, Baeyens F 1996 Flor H, Turk DC, Birbaumer N 1985 Assessment of stress
Do pain expectancies cause pain in chronic low back related psychophysiological reactions in chronic back
patients? A clinical investigation. Behaviour Research pain patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
and Therapy 34: 919-925 Psychology 53: 354-364
Crombez G, Eccleston C, Baeyens F, Eelen P 1998a When Flor H, Birbaumer N, Schugens MM, lutzenberger W 1992
somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking Symptom-specific psychophysiological responses in
enhances attentional interference. Pain 75: 187-198 chronic pain patients. Psychophysiology 29: 452-460
FEAR OF MOVEMENT/(REjINJURY, AVOIDANCE AND PAIN DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS 221
Fordyce WE 1976 Behavioural Methods for Chronic Pain developing a screening instrument. Proceedings of the
and Illness. Mosby, St Louis 8th World Congress on Pain. IASP Press, Seattle
Fordyce WE, Shelton JL, Dundore DE 1982 The Linton SJ, Buer N, Vlaeyen JWS, Hellsing A-L 1999 Are
modification of avoidance learning in pain behaviours. fear-avoidance beliefs related to the inception of an
Journal of Behavioural Medicine 5: 405-414 episode of back pain? A prospective study. Psychology
Fordyce WE, Brockway J, Bergman J, Spengler 0 1986 A and Health (in press)
control group comparison of behavioural versus Lousberg R, Schmidt AJM, Groenman NH 1990 The
traditional management methods in acute low back relationship between spouse solicitousness and pain
pain. Journal of Behavioural Medicine 2: 127-140 behaviour. Searching for more experimental evidence.
Gatchel RJ Turk DC 1996 Psychological Approaches to Pain 51: 75-80
Pain Management. A Practitioner's Handbook. Guilford McCracken LM, Gross RT 1993 Does anxiety affect coping
Press, New York with pain? Clinical Journal of Pain 9: 253-259
International Association for the Study of Pain 1986 McCracken LM, Zayfert C, Gross RT 1992 The Pain Anxiety
Classification of chronic pain, descriptions, descriptions Symptoms Scale: development and validation of a scale
of pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Pain to measure fear of pain. Pain 50: 63-67
Supplement 3: 1-225 McQuade KJ, Turner JA, Buchner OM 1988 Physical fitness
Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki M, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, and chronic low back pain. Clinical Orthopaedics and
Malkasian D, Ross JS 1994 Magnetic resonance Related Research 233: 198-204
imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back Melzack R, Wall PO 1965 Pain mechanisms: a new theory.
pain. New England Journal of Medicine 331: 69-73 Science 150: 978
Kaplan SH, Greenfeld S, Ware JE 1989 Assessing the Menard MR, Cooke C, Locke SR, Beach GN, Butler TB
effects of physician-patient interactions on the 1994 Pattern of performance in workers with low back
outcomes of chronic disease. Medical Care 27: 110-127 pain during a comprehensive motor performance
Kazdin AE 1980 Behaviour Modification in Applied Settings evaluation. Spine 2: 1359-1366
(revised edn). Dorsey Press, Homewood Ohman A 1987 The psychophysiology of emotion: an
Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main CJ 1997 Guide to assessing evolutionary-cognitive perspective. Advances in
psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: Risk Psychophysiology 2: 79-127
factors fC'r long-term disability and work loss. Accident Philips HC 1987 Avoidance behaviour and its role in
Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of sustaining chronic pain. Behaviour Research and
New Zealand and the National Health Committee, New Therapy 25: 273-279
Zealand Reitsma B, Meijler WJ 1997 Pain and patienthood. Clinical
Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE 1985 The West Haven-Yale Journal of Pain 13: 9-21
Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHY MPI). Pain 23: Romano JM, Turner JA 1985 Chronic pain and depression.
345-356 Does the evidence support a relationship? Psychological
Klenerman L, Slade PO, Stanley 1M et al 1995 The Bulletin 97: 311-318
prediction of chronicity in patients with an acute attack Rose M, Klenerman L, Atchinson L, Slade PO 1992 An
of low back pain in a general practice setting. Spine 4: application of the fear-avoidance model to three chronic
478-484 pain problems. Behaviour Research and Therapy 30:
Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DO 1990 Kinisophobia: a new view 359-365
of chronic pain behaviour. Pain Management Jan/Feb: Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ 1983 The use of coping strategies
35-43 in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient
Kugler K, Wijn J, Geilen M, de Jong J, Vlaeyen JWS 1999 characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 17: 33-44
The photograph series of daily activities (PHODA) (CD Skinner BF 1953 Science and Human Behaviour. Macmillan,
rom version). Institute for Rehabilitation Research and New York
School for Physiotherapy, Heerlen, the Netherlands Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J 1995 The pain
Lang P 1968 Fear reduction and fear behaviour: problems catastrophizing scale: development and validation.
in treating a construct. Research in Psychotherapy 3: Psychological Assessment 7: 524-532
90-102 Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M 1983 Pain and
Lazarus RS, Averill JR, Opton EM 1970 Towards a cognitive Behavioural Medicine. A Cognitive-behavioural
theory of emotion. In: Arnold MB (ed) Feelings and Perspective. Guilford Press, New York
Emotions. Academic Press, New York Turner JA 1996 Educational and behavioural interventions
Lethem J, Slade PO, Troup JOG, Bentley G 1983 Outline of for back pain in primary care. Spine 21: 1851-1858
a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM 1995 A cost-of-illness
perceptions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 21: study of back pain in the Netherlands. Pain 62: 233-240
401-408 Verbunt J, Van der Heijden G, Vlaeyen JWS, Heuts PHGT,
Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson L, Fordyce Pons C, Knottnerus A 2003 The disuse syndrome:
WE, Nachemson AL 1992 The effect of graded activity facts and fiction in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Eur J
on patients with sub-acute low back pain: a randomized Pain 7:9-21
prospective clinical study with an operant conditioning Vlaeyen JWS 1991 Chronic Low Back Pain: Assessment
behavioural approach. Physical Therapy 72: 279-290 and Treatment from Behavioural Rehabilitation
Linton SJ 1998 The socioeconomic impact of chronic back perspective. Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam
pain: is anyone benefiting? Pain 75: 163-168 Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ 2000 Fear-avoidance and its
Linton SJ, Halldeln K 1996 Risk factors and the natural consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state
course of acute and recurrent musculoskeletal pain: of the art Pain 85:317-332
222 GENERAL
Vlaeyen JWS, Snijders AMJ, Schuerman JA, van Eek H, Vlaeyen JWS, de Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts PGHT, Van
Groenman NH, Bremer JJCB 1989 Chronic pain and the Breukelen G 2001 Graded exposure in the treatment of
three-systems model of emotions. A critical pain-related fear: a replicated single case experimental
examination. Critical Reviews in Physical and design in patients with chronic low back pain. Beh Res
Rehabilitation Medicine 2: 67-76 Ther 39: 151-66
Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Boeren RGB, van Eek H Von Korff M 1996 A research program for primary care pain
1995a Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back management: back pain. In: Campbell IN (ed) Pain -
pain and its relation to behavioural performance. Pain an Updated Review. IASP Press, Seattle 457-465
62: 363-372 Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main C
Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Rotteveel A, Ruesink R, 1993 A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Heuts PHTG 1995b The role of fear of and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low
movement/(re)injury in pain disability. Journal of back pain and disability. Pain 52: 157-168
Occupational Rehabilitation 5: 235-252 Watson D, Clark LA 1984 Negative affectivity: the
Vlaeyen JWS, Seelen HAM, Peters M, De Jong P, Aretz E, disposition to experience aversive emotional states.
Beisiegel E, Weber, W 1999a Fear of movement/(re)injury Psychological Bulletin 96: 465-490
and muscular reactivity in chronic low back pain Watson D, Pennebaker JW 1989 Health complaints, stress,
patients: an experimental investigation. Pain 82: and distress: exploring the central role of negative
297-304 affect. Psychology Review 96: 234-254
FEAR OF MOVEMENT/(RE)INJURY, AVOIDANCE AND PAIN DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS 223
et al 2002a). Finally, studies have started to disen fuelled by intense, unexpected and novel bodily
tangle the underlying processes of exposure in sensations. There are other sources as well. Pain
order to optimize treatment effects. Crombez et al related fear may also be influenced by external
(2002), and Goubert et al (2002) have shown that information from the social environment.
during exposure, patients are reluctant to change Significant others, including health-care
their general belief that back stressing movements providers, may verbally and nonverbally convey
hurt and are harmful. Patients rather accept excep the message that there might be something dan
tions ('This particular movement does not cause gerously wrong with the back. It is likely that this
any harm, but all the others do.'). In order to max threatening information will be incorporated into
imize generalization of extinction, it is recom the individual's personal beliefs and convictions.
mended that exposure treatment is conducted in Rainville (1995) conjectured that 'Patients' atti
several different contexts, varying the specific tudes and beliefs [and thereby patients' disabil
movements, and that exposure sessions are dis ity levels] may be derived from the projected
tributed widely over time. attitudes and beliefs of health care providers'.
Empirical studies seem to support this idea. A
recent study showed that therapists with a bio
3. ARE HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS
mechanical view on back pain scored daily phys
FEARFUL?
ical activities as more harmful, and were less
What are the origins of catastrophic beliefs about likely to recommend return to daily life activities
pain and pain-related fear in patients with chron compared with the more behaviourally oriented
ic musculoskeletal pain? Fears can originate from therapists. This suggests that some health-care
traumatic experience. CLBP patients who retro providers a re also fearful about their patients
spectively reported a sudden traumatic pain being vulnerable to re-injuring themselves
onset, scored higher on the TSK than patients who (Houben et al in press). Health-care providers
reported that the pain complaints started gradu with higher levels of such fears also have an
ally (VIae yen et al 1995a). Additionally, there is increased risk for believing sick leave to be a
evidence that a large percentage of people with good treatment, not providing good information
chronic musculoskeletal pain meet DSM-IV crite about activities, and being uncertain about iden
ria for post-traumatic stress disorder(Asmundson tifying patients at risk for developing persistent
et aI 1998). Fearful appraisals about pain may be pain problems(Linton et al 2002b).
REFERENCES
Arntz A, Dreessen L, De Jong P 1 994 The influence of Eccleston C, Crombez G, Aldrich S, Stannard C 1 997
anxiety on pain: attentional and attributional mediators. Attention and somatic awareness in chronic pain. Pain
Pain 56(3): 307-1 4. 72(1 -2): 209-21 5
Asmundson GJ, Kuperos JL, Norton GR 1 997 Do patients Goubert L , Francken G, Crombez G, Vansteenwegen 0,
with chronic pain selectively attend to pain-related Lysens R 2002 Exposure to physical movement in
information?: preliminary evidence for the mediating chronic back pain patients: no evidence for
role of fear. Pain 72(1 -2): 27-32 generalization across different movements. Behaviour
Asmundson GJ, Norton GR, Allerdings MD, Norton PJ, Research Therapy 40(4) :41 5-29
Larsen OK 1 998 Posttraumatic stress disorder and Houben RMA, Ostelo RWJG, Vlaeyen JWS, Wolters PMJC,
work-related injury. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1 2(1 ): Peters ML, Stomp-van den Berg SGM. Health care
57-69. providers' orientations towards common low back pain
Crombez G, Eccleston C, Baeyens F, Eelen P 1 996 The predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and
disruptive nature of pain: an experimental investigation. recommendations regarding return to normal activity.
Behaviour Research Therapy 34(1 1 -1 2): 911 -9 1 8. The Clinical Journal of Pain (in press)
Crombez G, Eccleston C, Vansteenwegen 0, Vlaeyen JWS, Keogh E, Ellery 0, Hunt C, Hannent I 2001 Selective
Lysens R, Eelen P 2002Exposure to movement in low attentional bias for pain-related stimuli amongst pain
back pain patients: restricted effects of generalisation. fearful individuals. Pain 9 1 ( 1 -2): 9 1 -1 00
Health Psychology 2002 21 : 573-8 Linton SJ, Overmeer T, Janson M, Vlaeyen JWS, de Jong
Eccleston C, Crombez G 1999 Pain demands attention: a JR 2002a Graded in vivo exposure treatment for fear
cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of avoidant pain patients with functional disability: a case
pain. Psychological Bulletin 1 25(3): 356-366. study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 31 (2): 49-58
FEAR OF MOVEMEN T/(RE)INJURY, AVOIDANCE AND PAIN DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS 225
Linton SJ, Vlaeyen J, Ostelo R 2002b The back pain beliefs Vlaeyen JW, de Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts PH, van Breukelen
of health care providers: Are we fear-avoidant? Journal G 2001 Graded exposure in vivo in the treatment of
of Occupational Rehabilitation 12(4): 223-232 pain-related fear: a replicated single-case experimental
Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, van Drunen C 2000 Do fibromyalgia design in four patients with chronic low back pain.
patients display hypervigilance for innocuous Behaviour Research Therapy 39(2): 151-166
somatosensory stimuli? Application of a body scanning Vlaeyen JW, De Jong J, Geilen M, Heuts PH, Van Breukelen
reaction time paradigm. Pain 86(3): 283-292 G 2002b The treatment of fear of movement/(re)injury in
Peters ML, Vlaeyen JW, Kunnen AM 2002 Is pain-related chronic low back pain: further evidence on the
fear a predictor of somatosensory hypervigilance in effectiveness of exposure in vivo. Clinical Journal of
chronic low back pain patients? Behaviour Research Pain 18(4): 251-261
Therapy 40(1): 85-103 Vlaeyen JWS, de Jong JR, Onghena P, Kerckhoffs-Hanssen
Rainville J, Bagnall D, Phalen L 1995 Health care providers' M, Kole-Snijders AMJ 2002c Can pain-related fear be
attitudes and beliefs about functional impairments and reduced? The application of cognitive-behavioral
chronic back pain. Clinical Journal of Pain 11(4): 287-295 exposure in vivo. Pain Res Manag 7: 144-153
Vlaeyen JWS, de Jong JR, Sieben JM, Crombez G 2002a Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H
Graded exposure in vivo for pain-related fear. In: Turk 1995a Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back
DC, Gatchel RJ (eds) Psychological Approaches to Pain pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain
Management. A Practitioner's Handbook. 2nd ed. New 62(3): 363-72
York, Guilford, pp21 0-233
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
Index
228 INDEX
INDEX 229
retraining of muscle support 11 common peroneal nerve, palpation eight-finger soft tissue technique
cervical joints 86 110
dysfunction 6,10 compression neuropathy 87 elbow lateral glide technique 183
examination 6 cervical headache due to 9 elbow pain, lateral 88
see also cervical spine lumbar spine 79 elderly
cervical kinaesthesia 8-9,11 'cracking' /'popping' balance/strength deficits, exercise
cervical lateral glide technique 87 cavitation in HVLA technique 94 for 201
cervical muscles see neck muscles hand joints 95 skeletal effects of exercise 195
cervical nerve root compression, cruciate ligament, posterior, weight training 197
cervical headache due to 9 rupture 117 electrical stimulation, sacroiliac
cervical rotation, cervical headache Cybex system 216 dysfunction treatment 150
treatment 11 cycling, effect on bone mass 197 electromyography (EMG)
cervical spinal nerves, in cervical multifidus activity 130
headache 9 real-time ultrasound imaging
cervical spine 3-30 D combination with EMG 137
active movement, examination in comparison with EMG 137
cervical headache 6 dancers transversus abdominis activity 51
lordotic curve 7 demands on 142 emotional aspects
in pregnancy 107 floor surfaces 148 pain 212
natural apophyseal glides low back pain 141-142 sacroiliac dysfunction, in dancers
(NAGs) 179 causes 141-142 147-148
range of motion reduced, in prevalence 142 three-systems model 212
cervical headache 15 movements 142-143 end-feel, in spinal manipulative
see aLso cervical joints normal range of movement 145 thrust technique 20,25
cervicogenic headache 183 overuse injuries 147,148 inappropriate 21
Chicago technique, sacroiliac joint pain tolerance 144 exercise(s)
pain treatment 112, 113 psychological/ emotional stresses age-related skeletal effect
children, exercise and bone mass 147-148 195-196
195, 198 sacroiliac dysfunction see for balance/strength in elderly
cognitive-behavioural aspects, sacroiliac dysfunction, in 201
pain control 212,218,219-220 dancers bone loading 194-195,209
graded exposure 219-220,223-224 DeJarnette blocking 149, 150 effect in osteopenia 196
cognitive model, fear of depression 217 effect in post-menopausal women
movement/injury 215 discs see intervertebral disc 196
cognitive psychology, catastrophic disuse (deconditioning) syndrome importance during growth 195
thinking 214 213,215 for lumbar segmental control
combined movement theory (CMT) dowager's hump 191 see lumbar stabilization
19,22-27 dual energy X-ray absorptiometry exercises
assessment process 22-27 (DXA) osteoporosis management see
'functional demonstration' 23 bone density measurement osteoporosis
physical examination 23 189-190 reduced fracture risk with 194
subjective examination 22-23 interpretation 189-190 sacroiliac dysfunction treatment
fundamentals 22 Dye's model, of tissue homeostasis in dancers 149-150
interpretation and principles 116,117 exercise tests, osteoporosis 193
23-24 dysaesthetic pain 78
lumbar spine SMTI 29-30
prime movement and prime F
combination 23 E
selection of SMTI using 24,26-27 facet apposition locking 94,98
SMTI comparison/differences education, osteoporosis sidebending and rotation
22,23 management 201 movements 98-101
INDEX 231
flexion position 100-101 flexion pattern of lumbar hip extension exercises 200
neutral/extension position segmental instability 68 rotational instability treatment in
99-]00 internal rotation of femurs 117, thoracic spine 40,41
sitting position 100-101 118 gymnastics, bone mass increase
facet joints, lumbar spine, posture see also lumbar spine, flexion 195,196
control in pregnancy 107 fractures
facilitation techniques low back pain association 191
co-contraction of transversus reduced risk by exercise 194 H
abdominis and multifidus risk, factors influencing 188
54,73 sites, osteoporosis 190 hamstring muscles
local stability system retraining vertebral 190,201 lengthenmg techniques 164
160-162 functional reach, assessment in overactivity, taping effect 122
falls osteoporosis 193, 194 hand joints, 'cracking' /'popping' 95
fracture risk 188 functional stability dysfunction see head, postural control 7, 8
reduction in osteoporosis 199,201 lumbar segmental headache
fear, pain-reh1ted see pain-related instability/dysfunction; cervical see cervical headache
fear stability dysfunction tension 4,15
Fear Avoidance Beliefs functional stability retraining see unilateral 4
Questionnaire 215,216,218 lumbar stabilization exercises; see also cervical headache
fear-avoidance model, pain 215 stability rehabilitation health-care providers, fears of pain
fear-induced muscular reactivity 224
216 height loss' 190-191
fear of movement/injury G measurement 191
211-225 high-velocity low-amplitude
behavioural response 215 Gaenslens test 146 (HVLA) thrust technique
biopsychosocial model 216-217 gait 93-104
cognitive model 215 components 118 adverse effects 97
determinant of chronic pain 216 lateral shift in lumbar segmental contrailldications 96-98
management 218-220 instability 70 absolute 97
patient-therapist interaction number of cycles per annum 118 relative 97-98
effect 217-218 sacroiliac joillt role 143 direction of manipulation
see also pain-related fear shock absorption 118-119,123 100-101
femoral nerve 82 trendelenberg-like 118 factors affecting success 102
palpation 85,86 gas, in joint, cavitation in HVLA failure and analysis of reasons
femurs, internal rotation on techniques 94 101-102
bending L17,118 gate-control theory, pain 212 faults 102,110
fibromyalgia 223 Gillet standing flexion test 146 indications 94,95
figure of four position, anterior hip glucosamille sulphate 150 lumbar roll techniques 100, 109
tightness testing 120 gluteus maximus, activity ill back patient position 94,98,99
Fitter, the 166 pain 119 in pregnancy 109-110
flexibility, osteoporosis gluteus medius principle 93-94, 109
management 198-199 reduced activity 117-118 risk-benefit ratio 97
force closure training 123,124 safety during pregnancy 109
sacroiliac joint, and muscles gravity somatic dysfunction diagnosis
stiffeniJlg 137 centre of, control in lumbar 95-96
thoracic spine stability 37 stability rehabilitation 167 spinal locking for 94,98
form closure, thoracic spine influence on muscle recruitment see also facet apposition locking
stability 35-36 patterns 61 hip
forward bending grip strength, assessment 193 arthrodesis 118
dancers 145 gym ball extension exercises 200
extension pil ttern of lumbar global stability rehabilitation 164, external rotation ill dancers 142,
segmental instability 68-69 165 143, 144
232 INDEX
flexibility testing 120 for lumbar segmental stability 52 chronic see low back pain, chronic
flexion, chronic low back pain multifidus and role of real-time (below)
120 ultrasound 137 clinical features 66
flexion/ adduction manoeuvre, costs 115, 218
nerve trunkpain test 83-84 J in dancers see dancers
internal rotation 120 fractures associated 191
in lumbar spine movements joint(s) incidence 63-64
117-118 Dye's model, of tissue local muscle dysfunctions
movements homeostasis 116,117 (lumbar) 51-52
during gait 118-119 effusions 159 lumbar segmental instability and
increasing, techniques 123 envelope of function 116-117 49-50,66-72
reduced by internal rotation of gas, cavitation in HVLA multi-directional 71
femurs 117 techniques 94 see also lumbar segmental
hip adductors 120 pregnancy-associa ted changes instability /dysfunction
hip protectors 201 108-109 lumbar spinal rotation
hormone replacement therapy stiffness, chronic low back pain manipulation for 94
(HRT) 196 117 see also high-velocity low
hydrotherapy 201 see also individual joints amplitude (HVLA) thrust
hypervigilance, pain 223 joint receptor stimulation, passive technique
hysteresis 119-120 mobilizations 183 muscle control impairment 6-7
jumping, effect on bone mass 195 neuromuscular dysfwlction
65-66
non-specific 64
K overuse causing 147
iliac gapping test 146 in pregnancy see pregnancy
iliotibial band, tightness 117 Kaltenborn's principles 177 real-time ultrasolmd in
illness behaviour 218 kinesiophobia 215 rehabilitation 137
imagery, rotational instability knowledge of results, feedback on risk factors 115
treatment in thorac:ic spine 44 rehabilitation 131-132 sacroiliac joint dysfunction
instability kyphosis 191 causing see sacroiliac
lumbar see lumbar segmental measurement 191 dysfwlction
instability/dysfunction; see also thoracic kyphosis spinal stability dysfLmction and
stability dysfunction 156
thoracic, definition 36-37 tolerance, in dancers 144
International Association for the L transversus abdominis
Study ofPain 212 dysfwlctions 52
International Headache Society 3, leg length discrepancy 147 unilateral 70
15 leg pain, chronic 115-127 multifidus involvement 58
intervertebral disc levator scapulae weightlessness and 61
maximum range of rotation 119 overactivity in cervical headache 8 low back pain, chronic 115-127
radicular pain due to 85-86 postural supporting role 8 causative factors 118
thoracic lifestyle, healthy 198,201 as complex disorder 116
age-related changes 34 ligamentous stretch techniques, fear of movement/injury see fear
degeneration 34-35 low back of movement/injury
twisting movements effect on pain in pregnancy 111 joint stiffness 117
annulus fibrosus 119 locking, spinal see spinal locking mechanical findings 120-121
intra-abdominal pressure 65 'lock' position 20 pain-related anxiety 215,217
irritable spinal pain syndrome 21 lordosis psychosocial factors associated
isometric exercises back pain in pregnancy and 108 116
co-contraction of transversus cervical spine see cervical spine treatment
abdominis and multifidus lumbar see lumbar spine, lordosis aims 115
54-59,72-73 low back pain exacerbation concerns 115,116
INDEX 233
principle 117, 121 instability (flexion pattern) 68 segmental instability see lumbar
taping 121, 122, 123-124 loss 70 segmental instability/
unloading painful structures 121 low-load proprioception 166 dysfunction
lumbar dynamometry 218 movements segmental shifts (hinging) 66
lumbar multifidus see multifidus coupled, biomechanics 98-99, segmental stability 50-51, 116,
muscle 101 155, 156
lumbar radiculopathy 79 hip involvement 117-118 spinal manipulative thrust
lumbar roll techniques 100, 109 increased, low back pain 117, technique 29-30
lumbar segmental 120 lumbar spine, muscle
instability/dysfunction muscle recruitment patterns control/support 50
63-76, 155-175 120-121 balance of forces 157
clinical diagnosis 66-72 sidebending and rotation deep muscles
definition 64, 155 98-101 dysfunctions 156
diagnosis 158-159 movements classification 98,99 models of function 137-138
directional patterns 66-71 type 1 motion 98,99, 100 real-time ultrasound see real-
extension pattern 68-70 type 2 motion 98,99,100,101 time ultrasound imaging
flexion pattern 67-68 muscle contraction, nerve trunk visualization 129-132
lateral shift pattern 70,71 pain 80 global mobilizers 157
multi-directional pattern 70-71 muscle control-pain control global muscles 53,65
retraining of dynamic control 49-62 compensation for local muscle
162-163 diagnosis of impairments 61-62 dysfunction 66
low back pain and 49-50,63-64 see also lumbar spine, muscle direction of stability
manageIrent 72-74,123-124 control/support dysfunction 162-163,
motor learning model 72-73 nerve root compression 79 172-173
second/third stages 73-74 neuromuscular dysfunction local muscles vs 50
stability rehabilitation see 65-66 retraining 155
stability rehabilitation neutral zone 51,64,116-117 substitution strategies inhibition
stabilizing exercises see lumbar directional patterns of 73
stabilization exercises instability 67-68 global stabilizers 157
measurement 171 envelope of function and imbalance 156, 157
mutli-segmental level 156,157 116-117 sacroiliac dysfunction due to
physical examination, aims 72 instability vulnerability and 65, 147
see also stability dysfunction 66 sequelae 158
lumbar spine passive/ active and neural see also lumbar segmental
biomechanics 147 systems affecting 64, instability/dysfunction
extension, dancers 145 116 local muscles 50,51,53, 65
flexion uncompensated dysfunction diagnosis of impairments 61-62
control 163 116 dysfunctions 6-7,51-52,156
sacroiliac join t strain detection overuse causing low back pain global muscles vs 50
111 147 low loads for increased muscle
see also forward bending pain control, exercises 49-62 stiffness 50,53,65
HVLA see high-velocity low see also lumbar stabilization muscle recruitment before
amplitude (HVLA) thrust exercises actions 50,51
technique pain due to neutral joint position training
intervertebral segmental mobility pregnancy 106 159-160
test 87 sacroiliac joint pain vs 106 recruitment pattern 121,165
joint stabilization 50 see also low back pain re-education 52-53
lateral flexion 81,82,83 rotation manipulation 93-104 retraining 155
'locking' 70,71 'pop' ('crack') phenomena 94 local stabilizers 157
lordosis see also high-velocity low low threshold voluntary
flattening 68 amplitude (HVLA) thrust recruitment 171-172
increased 68-69, 120 technique measurement of control 171
234 INDEX
transversus abdominis and superficial flexors 7,16 lumbar spine see lumbar spine
multifidus 54-59 neck pain 3,4 mid thoracic spine see rnidthoracic
functional classification 157 atrophy of deep suboccipital spine
functions 156 extensors 8 passive/active and neural
imbalance combined movement theory 24 systems affecting 64,116
stability dysfunction 156,157 recruitment efficiency of cervical size and spinal stability see
see also lumbar spine, muscle flexors 171 lumbar segmental
control! support spinal manipulative thrust instability/dysfunction
retraining technique 24-25,26 spinal stabilizing system 37,51,
cervical headache treatment 11 see also cervical headache 64
see also lumbar stabilization negative affectivity (NA) 217 Northwick Park Neck Pain
exercises; stability nerve(s) Questionnaire 5
rehabilitation 'lengthening'/stretching 87 nutritional support, sacroiliac
spasm, back pain in pregnancy microcirculation compromised by dysfunction treatment 150
108 compression 87
stiffness, regulation for joint stretch and compression 87
stabilization 50 nerve nervorum, neuropeptides 78
strength, osteoporosis assessment nerve root compression 79
191-193 nerve trunk(s) 78 oblique abdominal muscles, range
muscle control mechanoreceptors 78,79,80 control 164
impairment, low back pain 6-7, mechanosensitivity 78,84 obturator intemus muscle 133
51-52 palpation, allodynia after 84-85 oestrogens
lumbar spine 50 stretch and compression 87 deficiency, post-menopausal 196
see also lumbar spine, muscle nerve trunk pain 77-92 in pregnancy 108
control/support; motor clinical examination 79-87 osteopathy, 'lock' position 20
control active movement 81-83 osteopenia
muscle control-pain control model allodynia after palpation 84-85 exercise effect 196
61 identification of cause 91 pain relief 201
diagnosis of impairments 61-62 local area of pathology 85-87 osteoporosis 187-209
lumbar rehabilitation see lumbar neural tissue involvement signs diagnostic criteria (WHO) 189,
stabilization exercises 80 191
muscle fibres, type I, 'moth-eaten' neural tissue provocation tests exercise management 194-198
51 84,85 age-related skeletal effect
musculoskeletal system, passive movement 83-84 195-196
impairment in cervical posture 80-81 bone loading 194-195,209
headache see cervical headache validation of techniques 91 dosage 197-198
clinical features 78 recommendations 198,199
definition 78 types 196-197
N treatment 87-88,91 fracture risk 188
upper spine 82 pain relieving techniques 201
natural apophyseal glides (NAGs) nervi nervorum 78 physiotherapy role 187
177,178,179-180 neural tissue provocation tests 84 assessment 191-194
neck, postural control 7,8 neurogenic pain 77 education 201
Neck Disability Index 5 neuromuscular dysfunction, management 193-201
neck muscles 6-7 lumbar spine 65-66,121 posture and flexibility 198-199,
deep flexors 7,16 neuropathic pain 200
holding capacity test 7,8 types 78 questionnarres 193-194
retraining 11 see also nerve trunk pain risk factors 189
deep muscles 7 neuropeptides, in nerve nervorum secondary 189
proprioception 8-9 78 signs/symptoms 190-191
endurance capacity loss 7 neutral zone 64 see also bone density/mass
functions 7 envelope of function and 116-117 overuse injuries, in dancers 147,148
236 INDEX
spine centre of gravity control 167 chronic low back pain treatment
buckling 7 functional progressions 166,167 121,122,123-124
dynamic state in pregnancy 107 integrative dissociation 167 effect on patellofemoral pain 122
see also specific anatomical regions low-load spine proprioception hamstring muscles overactivity,
spondylolisthesis 58,64 166 effect 122
spondylolysis, lumbar 58,64 processes 166 patellar 122
stability dysfunction 155,156-159 'red dot' integration system 166 postural, in osteoporosis 199,200
deep segmental system 156 local stability system, retraining for proprioception, midthoracic
diagnosis 158-159 159-162 spine 41
direction facilitation strategies (slow unloading painful structures, back
identification 159,162-163 motor units) 159-162 pain 121
retraining dynamic control guidelines for retraining 160 temporomandibular region,
162-163 neutral joint position control chronic pain 213
dynamic, factors contributing 159-162,173 tennis elbow, mobilization with
158 local stabilizers 157 movement (MWMs) 183
'give' and 'restriction' 157,158 retraining 160 thoracic kyphosis
identification 159,162 measurement of motor control in osteoporosis 191,199
management strategies 160 171 in pregnancy 107
hypermobility (compensatory) priorities and principles 159 thoracic outlet syndrome, in
158,162 step aerobics 195 pregnancy 107
local system 156 step test 193 thoracic spine 31-45
management see stability sternocleidomastoid muscles 16 anatomy 34
rehabilitation straight leg raise (SLR) test 80,84 discs see intervertebral disc
mechanical movement, elements in dancers 145 ligaments 34
158 strain and strain rate 209 mid thoracic see mid thoracic spine
muscle imbalance 156,157 stress natural apophyseal glides
rehabilitation/ control 163-165 cervical headache due to 5 (NAGs) 179-180
sequelae 158 psychophysiological response to rotational instability
mutli-segmental level 156 pain and 213 (midthoracic) see midthoracic
see also lumbar segmental sacroiliac dysfunction, in dancers spine
instability/dysfunction 147-148 stiffness, chronic low back pain
stability rehabilitation 155, suboccipital extensors, atrophy 8 120,123
159-168 suboccipital muscles, posterior 8 thoracic vertebrae, anatomy 34
active inhibitory restabilization sustained natural apophyseal 'time 6 minute walk' test 193
164-165 glides (SNAGs) 177,178, 'timed up and go' test 193
global mobilizers 157,175 179,180-183 transducers, ultrasound 129
lengthening or active inhibition functional movement patterns transversus abdominis
164-165 180-181 co-contraction with multifidus
global stability system, retraining spinal mobilization 52,65
155,162-164 with arm movement 181-182 exercises, ultrasound feedback
active inhibitory restabilization with leg movement 181-182 130
164-165 with limb movement 181 exercises and teaching
control of extensibility 174,175 'sway back' 68--69 54-59,72-73,123,130
control of imbalance 163-165 swimming, effect on bone mass see also lumbar stabilization
dynamic control of direction 197 exercises
162-163,172-173 delayed action 52
range of joint motion control T dysfunctions, low back pain 52,
163-164,173,174 65--66
global stabilizers 157 Tai Chi 201 early recruitment before actions
role 163 Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia 51
local! global stability integration (TSK) 215 inhibition 171
withnormal activity 165-168 taping lumbar segmental stability 51
INDEX 239
muscle test action 54 upper limb exercises, osteoporosis weightlessness, low back pain 61
real-time ultrasound imaging 200 weightlifting, bone mass increase
129-132 upper limb tension test (ULIT) 195
application and benefits 182 weight training
130-131 benefit in elderly 197
unloaded facilitation 160-161 effect on bone mass 196-197
trapezius muscle v recommendations 198
lower weight transfer, integrative
holding capacity test 8,9 vastus medialis oblique, activation, retraining 167
impairment in cervical and taping effect 122 whiplash 16
headache 8 vertebrae
retraining 11 deformity reduction by exercise
upper, in cervical headache 16 199
trigeminocervical nucleus 6 thoracic, anatomy 34
twisting movements, chronic low vertebral body, thoracic, anatomy zygapophyseal joint
back pain 119 34 cavitation 94-95
vertebral fractures 190,201 combined movement theory
visualization, co-contraction of assessment 23
u transversus abdominis and form closure, thoracic stability 37
multifidus 54 orientation 178
ultrasound imaging 127-128 osteophytes, nerve root
applications in rehabilitation 128 compression 79
real-time see real-time ultrasound w protection of annulus fibrosus
imaging 119
unloading, of painful structures walking, effect on bone mass 197 somatic dysfunction diagnosis,
(back pain) 121 walking tests, osteoporosis 193 acute/chronic 96