1.

a)
H0 : y 0 = 150
H1 : y 1 > 150
= 3, = 0,05
Intervalo de conanza = 95 %

b)

xi
145 + 153 + 150 + 147
=
= 148,75
n
4
x
148,75 150
Z0 = =
= 0,8333
3

x=

c)
RR|Z0 ,05| = 1,64
p = 1 0,79673 = 0,20327
Si el valor de p-value es >0.05 se acepta la Hiptesis nula

d)

x Z ,05 ( ) x + Z ,05 ( )
2
2
n
n
3
3
148,75 1,96( ) 148,75 + 1,96( )
4
4
145,81 151,69

2.

a)
H0 : x0 = 800
H1 : x1 6= 800
= 25, n = 16, x = 800, = 812, = 0,05
Intervalo de conanza = 95 %

b)
Z0 =

800 812
25
16

= 1,92

RR|Z 0,05 | = Z0,025 = 1,96

2

c)
p = 1 0,97257 = 0,02743
Si el valor de p-value es >0.05 se acepta la Hiptesis nula

d)

x Z ,05 ( ) x + Z ,05 ( )
2
2
n
n
25
25
812 1,96( ) 812 + 1,96( )
16
16
799,75 824,25

3.

a)
H0 : 0 = 0,255
H1 : 1 6= 0,255
= 0,0001, n = 10, x = 0,2545, = 0,255, = 0,05
Intervalo de conanza = 95 %

b)
Z=

0,0005
= 15,8117
0,000031622

RR|Z 0,05 | = Z0,025 = 1,96

2

Comparar 15.81 contra el valor de tabla 1.96.

Como 1.96 es menor que 15.81, entonces se rechaza la hiptesis nula.
Hay evidencia signicativa para rechazar la hiptesis nula.

c)
pvalue = 1 ,9998 = 0,0002
Siempre se va a rechazar la hiptesis nula, estadisticamente hablando.
Existe una minima probabilidad de rechazar la hiptesis nula.

d)

x Z ,05 ( ) x + Z ,05 ( )
2
2
n
n
0,0001
0,0001
0,2545 1,96(
) 0,2545 + 1,96(
)
10
10
0,254438 0,254562

4.

x Z 2 x Z 2
n
n
= 3 2 = 9
Z 2 = Z 0,05 = Z0,025 = 1,96
2

x Z ,05 ( ) x + Z ,05 ( )
2
2
n
n
2

3
3
x 1,96 x + 1,96
n
n
5,88
2( )=1
n

(11,76 = n)2
n = 11,762
n 138

5.

a)
H0 : 0 = 120
H1 : 1 > 120
= 0,01, n = 10, = 120
Intervalo de conanza = 99 %

b)

x=

xi
108 + 124 + 124 + 106 + 115 + 138 + 163 + 159 + 134 + 139
=
= 131
n
10

sP

s=

x)2

(xi
n1

sP

(108 131)2 +

t0 =

x
s
n

(124 131)2 + ... + (xi x2 )

= 19,54
9

131 120
19,54

10

= 1,78

t0 > t,n1
t0,01,9 = 2,821
t0 = 1,78 < 2,821

c)
t 2 ,n1 = t0,0005,9 = 3,250

d)

S
S
x t 2 1n 1 x + t 2 1n 1
n
n
19,54
19,54
131 3,25( ) 131 + 3,25( )
10
10
110,91 151,086

6.
s

x = 131, = 120, n = 10
s

(xi x)2
=
n

Z0 =

(108 131)2
18,54
10
131 120

18,54

10

= 1,87

Z0 > Z
Z0,01 = 2,32 y Z0 = 1,87
1,87 < 2,32
No existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis nula.

7.

a)
H0 : 0 = 225
H0 : 0 > 225
x = 241,5, = 0,05, n = 16
Intervalo de conanza = 95 %
sP

(xi x)2
= 98,73
n1

s=

b)
t0 =

x
s
n

241,5 225
98,73

16

0,6684

c)
RR{t0 > t0,05,161 }
0,668/ > 1,753
pv alue = 0,2570

d)

s
s
x + t 1 x t 1
2
2
n
n
98,73
98,73
241,5 + t0,05/2,161
241,5 t0,05/2,161
16
16
188,9 294,09
No existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis nula.

8.

H0 : = 225
H0 : 6= 225
sP

x = 241,5, = 0,05, n = 16
s

(xi x)2
=
n

Z=

(98,73)2 (15))
= 95,5949
16

241,5 255
95,5949

16

= 0,6904

RR{Z0 > Z0,05 }

0,6904 > 1,64
Existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis alterna.

9.

a)
H0 : 1 = 2
H0 : 1 6= 2
x1 = 16,015, x2 = 16,005, 1 = 0,015, 2 = 0,018, = 0,05, n = 10
Intervalo de conanza = 95 %

b)

x1 x2
16,015 16,005
= 1,3496
Z0 = r
=q
0,0152
0,0182
12
22
+
10
10
n1 + n2
No existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis nula.

c)
P = 2(1 0,9099) = 0,1802

d)

(X 1 X 2 ) Z
s

(16,0516,005)1,64

12 22
+
1 2 (X 1 X 2 ) + Z
n1 n2

12 22
+
n1 n2
s

(0,015)2 (0,018)2
+
1 2 (16,0516,005)+1,64
10
10

(0,015)2 (0,018)2
+
10
10

0,0021 1 2 0,022

10.

H0 : 1 2 = 10
H0 : 1 2 > 10
= 0,01, x1 = 162,5, x2 = 155,0, n1 = 10, n2 = 12, 1 = 1,0, 2 = 1,0
Intervalo de conanza = 99 %
5

Z0 > Z
Z0 =

x1 x2 (1 2 )
r

12
n1

22
n2

7,5 1,0
=q 2
= 5,83
1
12
+
10
12

Z0,01 = 2,33
5,83 > 2,3
s

x1 x2 Z 2

p value = 0,3434
12 22
1 2 x1 x2 + Z 2
n1 n2

12 22
n1 n2

7,5 2,58(1,1099) 1 2 7,5 + 2,58(1,1099)

6,39 1 2 8,60
Existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis alterna.

11.

a)

12 = 22
12 6= 22
= 0,05, S1 = 9,264, S2 = 9,3666, x1 = 70,4, x2 = 70,2
F0 > F 2 , n1 1, n2 1
F0 < F1 2 , n1 1, n2 1
F0 > F0,025,9,9
F0 > 4,03
F0 =
F0 =

S12
S22

9,2642
= 0,97825
9,3662

F0 = 0,97825/ > 4,03

b)
H0 : 1 = 2
H1 : 1 6= 2
= 0,05
RR|t0 | > t 2 , n1 1, n2 1
|t0 | > t0,025,18
s

Sp =

|t0 | > 2,101

S12 (n1 1) + S22 (n2 1)
=
n1 + n2 2
t0 =

x1 x2
q

Sp

1
n1

1
n2

9,2642 (9) + 9,3662 (9)

= 9,3154
18

70,4 70,2
q

9,3154

1
10

1
10

= 0,04800

c)
p value = 0,9622
No existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis nula

12.

a)

H0 : S12 = S22
H0 : S12 6= S22
= 0,05, S12 = 0,76004, S22 = 0,82138, x1 = 3,3166, x2 = 3,9333
|F0 > F 2 ,n11,n21 y F0 < F1 2 ,n11,n21 |
F0 > F 0,05

2,5,5

F0 >F 0,025,5,5
F0 > 7,15
F0 <

1
= 0,1398
7,15

S12
0,76004
= 0,8562
=
0,82138
S22

F0 =

H0 : 1 = 2
H0 : 1 6= 2
= 0,05
s

Sp =

S12 (n1 1) + S22 (n2 1)

=
n1 + n2 2
t0 =

x1 x2
q

Sp

1
n1

1
n2

0,760042 (5) + 0,821382 (5)

= 0,8892
10

3,3166 3,9333
q

0,8892

1
6

1
6

= 1,0965

|t0 | > t 2 ,n11+n21

|t0 | > t0,025,5,5
|t0 | > 7,15
1,0965 > 7,15

b)
p value = 0,2989

c)
F0 =

S12
0,76004
=
= 0,8562
2
0,82138
S2

Existe evidencia suciente para aceptar la hiptesis nula

13.

a)

H0 : 12 = 22
H1 : 12 6= 22
y 1 = 12,8, y 1 = 10,2, n1 = 8, n2 = 9, S12 = 101,17, S12 = 99,73, alpha = 0,05
S12
101,17
=
= 1,0679
99,73
S12

F0 =

|F0 > F 2 ,n11,n21 y F0 < F1 2 ,n11,n21 |

F0 > F 0,05

2,7,8

1,0679 > 4,53

F0 < F0,975,7,8
1,0679 < 0,2207

b)
H0 : 1 = 2
H0 : 1 < 2
= 0,05
s

Sp =

S12 (n1 1) + S22 (n2 1)

=
n1 + n2 2
t0 =

x1 x2
q

Sp

1
n1

101,172 (7) + 94,732 (8)

= 9,8861
15

10,2 12,5

1
n2

9,8861

94,73
9

101,17
8

= 0,048

t0 < t,v
t0 < t0,05,15
0,048 < 1,753
Existe evidencia suciente para aceptar la hiptesis nula

14.

a)

n = 20, 2 = 1,0, = 0,05

Intervalo de conanza = 95 %
P
2

S =

(xi x)2
= 0,7903
n1

2( ) = 32,85
2

21( )
2

= 8,91

(n 1)S 2
(n 1)S 2
< 2 <
2

21
2

0,4570 < < 1,6852

8

b)

H0 : 2 = 1
H1 : 2 6= 1
(n 1)S 2
= 15,01
2
15,01 < 8,9115,01 > 32,85
2 =

No existe evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis nula.

15.

a)

H0 : S12 = S22
H1 : S12 6= S22
x1 = 0,266250, x2 = 0,26600, S1 = 0,001215, S2 = 0,001758
F0 =

S12
(0,001215)2
= 0,691126
=
(0,001758)2
S22
H0 : 1 = 2
H1 : 1 6= 2
Sm2 = 2,28409
ESE1 E2 = 2,200958
t0 = 0,200985

b)
p value = 0,3434

c)
0,015502 1 2 0,0160

16.

a)
H0 : 1 = 2
H1 : 1 6= 2
= 0,05, S1 = 0,146, S2 = 0,04938, x1 = 1,34, x2 = 1,066
Intervalo de conanza = 95 %

F0 =

S12
(0,146)2
=
= 8,745
(0,04938)2
S22

RR|F0 > F 2 ,n11,n21 F0 > F1 2 ,n11,n21 |

F 0,05 ,8,8 = 4,43
2

F0 > 4,43
t0 =

(x1 x2 ) (1 2 )
r

S12
n1

S2

( n11 +

V =

(S 2
1 )2
n1
n1 +1

S22 2
n2 )
(S 2
2 )2
n2
n2 +2

S22
n2

(1,34 1,066)
=q
= 5,3188
0,1462
0,049382
+
9
9

2 = 10,25 por lo tanto V = 10 grados de libertad

t 0,05 = 2,228
2,10

|t0 | > t0,025,10

t0 = 5,3188 > 2,228

b)
p value = V = 10 p 0,0005
t0,10 = 4,587

c)

x1 x2 t 2
r

1,3401,0662,228

S12 S22
+
1 2 x1 x2 + t 2
n1
n2

S12 S22
+
n1
n2
r

0,2135 0,0024384
+
1 2 1,3401,066+2,228
9
9
0,1588 1 2 0,3878

0,2135 0,0024384
+
9
9

Se tiene evidencia suciente para rechazar la hiptesis nula

17.

a ) * Ver Figura 1 y Figura 2

Formulacin 1:

x1 = 194,5, S1 = 10,18, S12 = 103,55

Formulacin 2:

x2 = 193,08, S2 = 9,949, S22 = 98,99

Los grcos no apoyan los supuestos de normalidad e igualdad de la varianza en ambas muestras.

10

Figura 1: Grca formulacin 1

Figura 2: Grca formulacin 2

b)
H0 : 1 = 2 = 0
H1 : 1 > 2 = 0
Sm2 =

(n1 1)S12 + (n2 1)S22

(12 1)103,55 + (12 1)98,99
=
= 101,27
n1 + n2 2
12 + 12 2
s

ESE1 +E2 =

Sm2 Sm2
+
=
n1
n2

101,272 101,272
+
= 4,1083
12
12

t22,0,025 = 0,3456
RR|t0 > tn1+n22 , 0,05|
RR0,3456 > 1,717

c)
p value = 0,3664
Existe evidencia suciente para aceptar la hiptesis nula.

11

18.

H0 : 1 2 = 3
H1 : 1 2 > 3
= 0,05x1 = 199,5, x2 = 193,083, S1 = 10,175, S2 = 9,949
S2
10,1752
F0 = 12 =
= 1,04599
9,9492
S2
|F0 > F 2 ,n1 1,n2 1 yF0 < F1 2 ,n1 1,n2 1 |
F 0 > F0,05,2,11,11
1,04599 > 3,473699
F0 < F0,975,7,8
1,04599 < 13,473699
h0 : 1 2 = 3
h1 : 1 2 > 3
s

Sp =

= 0,05

S12 (n1 1) + S22 (n2 1)

10,1752 (12 1) + 9,9492 (12 1)
=
= 10,0632
n1 + n2 2
12 + 12 2
194,5 193,083
(1 2 ) (x1 x2 )
q
q
=
t0 =
= 0,5450
1
1
Sp n11 + n12
10,0632 12
+ 12
t0 > t,v
t0 > t0,05,22
0,5450 > 2,0738

Existe evidencia suciente para aceptar la hiptesis nula

19.

a)
H0 : 1 2 = 0
H1 : 1 2 = 0
S1 = 0,4503, S2 = 0,2326, n1 = 8, n2 = 8, x1 = 9,95, x2 = 10,3625

b)

S12 n1 + S22 n2
(0,45032 )8 + (0,23262 )8
Sp =
=
= 0,5843
n1 + n2 2
8+82
(1 2 ) (x1 x2 )
9,95 10,3625
q
q
t0 =
= 2,8065
=
Sp n11 + n12
Sp 18 + 81
t 2 ,14 = 2,145

c)

(x1 x2 ) t 2 ,n1+n22 (Sp

1
1
+ ) (x1 x2 ) + t 2 ,n1+n22 (Sp
n1 n2
r

1
1
+ )
n1 n2
r

1 1
(9,95 10,3625) 2,145(0,5843
+ ) (9,95 10,3625) + 2,145(0,5843
8 8
1,0366 0,2866

1 1
+ )
8 8

Existe evidencia suciente para aceptar la hiptesis alterna.

12