MODELAMIENTO Y SIMULACIN DE LA HIDRLISIS ENZIMTICA DE BIOMASA

LIGNOCELULSICA
ENERGIAS ALTERNATIVAS, 1ER SEMESTRE DE 2014
INGENIERA MECNICA, UNIVERSIDAD DEL NORTE
Prof. A Gonzlez Quiroga
Calificacin: 30% del tercer parcial para notas de trabajo hasta 4,4; 40% del tercer parcial para
notas entre 4,4 y 4,8; Exoneracin del parcial para notas de 4,9 a 5.
Penalizacin pro fecha de entrega: -20% de la nota obtenida
Fecha de entrega y sustentacin oral: mircoles 14 de mayo
GRUPO PROCESO CONF GRUPO
1 AD; 5 CSTR; =10 h (5% + 5% + 5%);
E1bc=2; E2fl=1.7
Jorge - Silvana
2 AL; AR-PFR-5 CSTR;

P
=2 h;
R
=10 h
5% - 15% S
AT

E1bc=1.2; E2fl=1.7
lvaro - Hugo
3 AD; 7 CSTR; =20 h (10% + 5%); E1bc=2;
E2fl=0.88
ngel - Victor
AD; 6 CSTR; =25 h (10% + 5% + 3%);
E1bc=1.5; E2fl=0.88
Estafana Orozco -
Peter
4 AL; AR-PFR-5 CSTR;

P
=3 h;
R
=20 h
5% - 20% S
AT

E1bc=2; E2fl=1.1
Gmez- Orozco
5 AD; 8 CSTR; =30 h (7.5% + 7.5%);
E1bc=1.1; E2fl=1.7
Bustamante -
Romero
6 AL; AR-PFR-5 CSTR;

P
=2 h;
R
=40 h
5% - 10% S
AT

E1bc=1.7; E2fl=1.7
Duarta - Melva
7 AD; 5 CSTR; =40 h (10% + 5% + 5%);
E1bc=1.1; E2fl=0.88
Prez - Ramos
8 AL; AR-PFR-5 CSTR;

P
=4 h;
R
=10 h
3% - 10% S
AT

E1bc=2; E2fl=1.7
Yepes Nelson -
Frank
9 AD; 7 CSTR; =50 h (7.5% + 7.5% + 7.5%);
E1bc=1.5; E2fl=0.5
Sanchez Marquez -
Mesa
10 AL; AR-PFR-5 CSTR;

P
=2 h;
R
=30 h
5% - 18% S
AT

E1bc=1.4; E2fl=1.6
Sandoval
11 AD; 10 CSTR; =45 h (7.5% + 7.5% + 7.5%);
E1bc=1.5; E2fl=0.5
Camilo - Juan S
12 AL; AR-PFR-7 CSTR;

P
=3.5 h;
R
=20 h
3% - 20% S
AT

E1bc=1.4; E2fl=1.6
Urquijo Polo -
Perdomo
AD: Alimentacin distribuida; AL: Adsorcin licuefaccin
Contenido del trabajo
1. Modeling framework: Kinetic model, Operation strategy and mathematical model
2. A detailed explanation of the methodology, including algorithms for the numerical
solution
3. Results and discussion: Cellobiose profiles for macrofluid and microfluid; glucose
profiles for macrofluid and microfluid; Glucose concentration profiles for macrofluid
and microfluid
4. A general assessment of the economic and technical feasibility of the technology
5. Quantitative conclusions