Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Rey Laca
Rey Laca
CABAUTAN, Evangeline
CATBAGAN, Julie Ann O.
DEPIDEP, Jocelyn
IGNACIO, Jonh Felix
SALVADOR, Kathleen Allysa V.
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
I INTRODUCTION
B) Define status.
ANSWER: Status: the condition of a person or thing in the eyes of the law.
C) What are the differences between a civil action and a special proceeding?
ANSWER: The differences between a civil action and special proceeding are the
following:
1) As to purpose, an action seeks to address a wrong or the violation of a right while a
special proceeding seeks to establish a right, status, or fact.
2) As to nature, an action is adversarial in nature, putting the plaintiff against the
defendant while a special proceeding is usually non-adversarial even if there is an
oppositor.
3) As to degree of evidence, in an action, the party who establishes a preponderance of
evidence in his favor is considered the victor, while in a special proceeding
D) Name the different special proceedings in the Rules of Court and indicate what each
establishes.
ANSWER:
E) Give ten special proceedings provided by laws or rules other than the Rules of Court
and indicate what each establishes.
ANSWER:
What it establishes
Source Special Proceeding (Right/ Status/
Fact)
Administrative Correction of Entry/ Change Of
R.A. No. First Name or Nickname
9048, as Correction of Date of Birth (day and month only)
amended by Change of Sex of a Person (clerical or FACT
R.A. No. typographical or mistake in entry only)
10172 Clerical or Typographical Errors which can be
corrected by the Civil Registry
A.M. No. 03-
Guardianship of Minors STATUS
02-05-SC
Domestic Adoption STATUS
A.M. No. 02-
Rescission of Adoption STATUS
06-02-SC
Inter-country Adoption STATUS
RIGHT to custody
Custody of Minors
A.M. No. 03- of minors
04-04-SC RIGHT to custody
Habeas Corpus in relation to minors
of minors
Declaration of nullity of void marriage or
A.M. No. 02-
Annulment of marriage Civil STATUS
11-10-SC
A.M. No. 02-
Legal Separation Civil STATUS
11-11-SC
Petition on Foster Care and Temporary
R.A. No. STATUS
Custody
8369
Declaration of Nullity of Marriage Civil STATUS
RIGHT to life,
A.M. No. 07-
Writ of Amparo liberty, and
09-12-SC
property
RIGHT to life,
A.M. No. 08-
Writ of Habeas Data liberty, and
01-16-SC
property
RIGHT to a
A.M. No. 09-
Writ of Kalikasan balanced and
06-08-SC
healthful ecology
II SETTLEMENT OF ESTATE
ANSWER: Settlement of estate refers to the process of determination of all the assets of
the estate, payment of its liabilities, and distribution of the residual to those entitled to the
same.
The interest which natural persons have in it is not complete until there has been a due
administration; and one who forges the name of the decedent to an instrument purporting
to be a promissory note must be regarded as having intended to defraud the estate of the
decedent, and not the natural persons having diverse interests in it, since ha cannot be
presumed to have known who those persons were, or what was the nature of their
respective interest.
ANSWER: The estate may be settled by any interested party. An interested party is one
who would be benefited by the estate, such as an heir, or one who has a claim against the
estate, such as a creditor; thus interest must be material and direct, not merely indirect or
contingent.
D) What are the two kinds of settlement of estate? Give three differences between the
two.
ANSWER: The two kinds of settlement of estate are judicial and extrajudicial
settlement.
1) As to court intervention, it is required in judicial settlement but not in extrajudicial
settlement.
2) As to existence of debt, extrajudicial settlement requires that there be no outstanding
debts at the time of settlement of estate. Compared to judicial settlement, it is
available even if there are debts, for it is the court which will make the provision for
its payment.
3) As to who may institute, extrajudicial settlement may be resorted to at the instance of
and by the agreement all heirs, while judicial settlement may be instituted by any
interested party, even the creditors of estate without the consent of all heirs.
ANSWER: The two ways to settle an estate extrajudicially are through public instrument
or in an affidavit. The form of extrajudicial settlement depends on the number of heirs.
If the decedent left more than one heir, the settlement must be made in a public
instrument. If the decedent left only one heir, it suffices that the heir executes an affidavit
of self-adjudication.
IV JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT
ANSWER: NO, Probate is a special proceeding for establishing the validity of a will. It
seeks to prove that instrument submitted is the will of the testator, that it was executed
according to the formalities required by law, and that the testator had the testamentary
capacity at the time of execution, while a judicial settlement does not only entail a
probate of will, it also includes a summary settlement of estate of small value, petition for
letters of administration.
ANSWER: Municipal Trial Courts and Regional Trial Courts are both empowered to
take cognizance of estate proceedings. The gross value delineates which court has
jurisdiction in the settlement of estate. MTC has exclusive jurisdiction to settle an estate
if its gross value does not exceed P300, 000 or P400, 000 if within Metro Manila. If it
exceeds said amount, then the RTC has jurisdiction.
V INTESTATE PROCEEDINGS
C) What are the jurisdictional facts that must be alleged in a petition to be filed in
intestate proceedings?
ANSWER: In Garcia Vda.de Chua vs CA, the jurisdictional facts required in a petition
for issuance of letters of administration are the following:
1) Death of testator
2) Residence at the time of death in the province where the probate court is located; and
3) If the decedent is a non-resident, the fact of being a resident of foreign country and
that the decedent has left an estate in the province where the court is sitting.
ANSWER:
VI TESTATE PROCEEDINGS
A) What is probate?
ANSWER: Probate is a special proceeding for establishing the validity of a will. It seeks
to prove that instrument submitted is the will of the testator, that it was executed
according to the formalities required by law, and that the testator had the testamentary
capacity at the time of execution.
No will shall pass either real or personal property unless it is proved and allowed in
accordance with the Rules of Court. (Art. 838)
B) What is a will?
ANSWER: A will is an act whereby a person is permitted, with the formalities
prescribed by law, to control to a certain degree the disposition of this estate, to take
effect after his death. Article 783
C) What is a testament?
A “last will and testament,” or simply a “will,” is “an act whereby a person is permitted,
with the formalities prescribed by law, to control to a certain degree the disposition of his
estate”. It is a document whereby a person, called the “testator,” disposes of his/her
properties or “estate,” to take effect upon his/her death.
D) What are the two kinds of wills? Give ten differences between them.
ANSWER: The two kinds of wills are notarial will and holographic will.
ANSWER: It is the act of proving in court a document purporting to be the last will and
testament of a certain deceased person for the purpose of its official recognition,
registration and carrying out its provision in so far as they are in accordance with the law
It is the statutory method of establishing the proper execution of an instrument and giving
notice of its contents.
ANSWER: It is for the official recognition, registration and carrying out of the
provisions of the will in so far as they are in accordance with law.
Its purpose is to finally and definitively settle all questions concerning the capacity of the
testator and the proper execution and witnessing of his last will and testament,
irrespective of whether its provisions are valid and enforceable or otherwise.
ANSWER: It has the effect of passing either real or personal estate (Section 1, Rule 75)
It conclusively established against the whole world the fact that a will was duly executed
with the formalities prescribed by law and that the testator had the capacity to make the
will. In short, the allowance of will cannot be impugned on any grounds authorized by
law, except that of fraud, in any separate or independent action or proceeding.
ANSWER: Extrinsic validity deals with the form of the will and its due execution,
rather than its content. It determines (1) whether the instrument is truly the decedent’s
last will; 2) whether it complies with the formalities prescribed by law; 3) whether the
testator had testamentary capacity at the time he executed the will; and, 4) whether the
testator voluntarily executed the will (Ajero v. Court of Appeals, 236 SCRA 488). These
tests will be applied to determine the extrinsic validity of your father’s last will. If it
passes the tests, then his will is extrinsically valid. It will be allowed in court, regardless
of its content.
The second aspect, which is the intrinsic validity of the will, deals with dispositions
stipulated by the testator. It refers to the legality of the provisions of the will for the right
granted to a person to designate the person or persons who are to succeed him or her, is
not absolute. It is subject to limitations placed by law.
I) What must be considered in determining the extrinsic validity of a will? Define each.
ANSWER: Any executor, devisee, or legatee named in a will, or any other person
interested in the estate, may, at any time after the death of the testator, petition the court
having jurisdiction to have the will allowed, whether the same be in his possession or not,
or is lost or destroyed. The testator himself may, during his lifetime, petition the court for
the allowance of his will. (Sec. 1, Rule 76)
In Heirs of Fran vs Salas, the persons who may petition for allowance of will are the
executor, devisee, legatee, any other person interested in the estate, and the testator
himself. A devisee or legatee named in the will need not be a relative of the decedent t
enable such person to file the petition. An interested party allowed to petition for
allowance of will is one who would be benefited by the estate, such as heir, or one who
has claim against the estate such as creditor.
K) May an heir who has renounced his inheritance ask for the allowance of a will?
ANSWER: No, an heir who renounced his inheritance cannot ask for allowance of will,
because he is not an interested party. An interested party is one who would be benefited
by the estate, such as an heir, or one who has a claim against the estate such as a creditor.
In renunciation of inheritance, one expressly waives his rights to the estate. In effect, he
cannot be benefited by the estate, thus, he is not an interested party and he cannot ask for
allowance of a will.
ANSWER: A person died leaving a will; in case of a resident, that he resided within the
territorial jurisdiction of the court; in case of a non0-resident, he left an estate within such
territorial jurisdiction of the court .Jurisdictional facts refer to the fact of death of the
decedent, his residence at the time of his death in the province where the probate court is
sitting, or if he is an inhabitant of a foreign country, the estate he left in such
province. The rules do not require proof that the foreign will has already been allowed
and probated in the country of its execution. (G.R. No. 169144, January 26, 2011; IN RE:
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO APPROVE THE WILL OF RUPERTA
PALAGANAS WITH PRAYER FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL
ADMINISTRATOR, MANUEL MIGUEL PALAGANAS and BENJAMIN GREGORIO
PALAGANAS, Petitioners, vs. ERNESTO PALAGANAS, Respondent)
Note: Original will need not be attached, for it is not a jurisdictional requirement. Mere
delivery is sufficient. If the will is delivered to the court, the court may motu proprio fix
time and place for proving the will and issue corresponding notice.
When the petition for probate is made after the deposit of will, petition relates back to the
time when the will was delivered (date of filing = date of delivery or deposit of will.
Our rules require merely that the petition for the allowance of a will must show, so far as
known to the petitioner: (a) the jurisdictional facts; (b) the names, ages, and residences of
the heirs, legatees, and devisees of the testator or decedent; (c) the probable value and
character of the property of the estate; (d) the name of the person for whom letters are
prayed; and (e) if the will has not been delivered to the court, the name of the person
having custody of it. (G.R. No. 169144, January 26, 2011; IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF
THE PETITION TO APPROVE THE WILL OF RUPERTA PALAGANAS WITH
PRAYER FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR, MANUEL
MIGUEL PALAGANAS and BENJAMIN GREGORIO PALAGANAS, Petitioners, vs.
ERNESTO PALAGANAS, Respondent)
ANSWER: When the petition for probate is filed by persons other than the testator, the
court has to send notice of time or place of hearing to the designated or known heirs,
legacies, or devisees, who are residents of the Philippines. The duty to notify attaches
only when the heirs, legacies, or devisees are known and their residence are known.
Section 4, Rule 76 - If the testator asks for the allowance of his own will, notice shall be
sent only to his compulsory heirs
ANSWER: The remedy is appeal. In Rule 109, Sec. 1, an interested person may appeal
in special proceedings from an order or judgment of allowance of will.
ANSWER: The following are the grounds for the disallowance of a will.
1) If the formalities required by law are not complied with;
2) If the testator was insane, or otherwise mentally incapable of making a will, at the
time of its execution;
3) If it was executed through fraud or under duress, or influence of fear or threats;
4) If it was procured by undue and improper pressure and influence, on the part of
the beneficiary or of some other person;
5) If the signature of the testator was procured through fraud; or
6) If the testator acted by mistake or did not intend that the instrument he signed
should be his will at the time of affixing his signature thereto
1) Executor;
2) Devisee;
3) Legatee;
4) Any interested person;
5) Testator himself
ANSWER: The disallowance of will has the effect of ensuing intestate proceeding, and
thereafter, the issuance of Letters of Administration. Letters of Administration refers to
the authority issued by the court to a competent person to administer the estate of the
deceased who died intestate or without a will.
ANSWER:
3) May a petition for probate filed by the testator himself be subject to opposition?
ANSWER: Yes, the petition for probate filed by the testator himself may be subject
to opposition on grounds of lack of testamentary capacity. Testamentary capacity is
determined at the time the will was executed. If the testamentary capacity of the
testator is questioned, the person who alleges the insanity of the testator has the
burden of proof.
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
VII EXECUTORS
A) Who is an executor?
ANSWER: An executor is a person nominated by the testator in his will to carry out his
direction and request thereof and to dispose of the property according to his testamentary
provisions after his death.
ANSWER: Anyone may become the executor, provided he is not disqualified under the
following conditions:
1) Minor;
2) Not resident of the Philippines; or
3) In the opinion of the court, he is unfit to execute the duties of trust by reason of
drunkenness, improvidence, or want of understanding or integrity, or by reason of
conviction of an offence involving moral turpitude.
ANSWER: One may become an executor upon the issuance of Letters Testamentary.
Letters Testamentary is the authority issued to the executor named in the will to manage
and administer the estate. Provided further, the executor is competent, accepts the trust,
and gives the required bond.
ANSWER: One may be removed as an executor upon filing of a Motion for Opposition-
in-Intervention in the issuance of Letters Testamentary. The motion shall allege any of
the following grounds, but not limited to:
1) Neglects to:
2) Absconds;
3) Becomes insane; or
4) Becomes incapable or unsuitable to discharge the trust.
VIII ADMINISTRATORS
A) Who is an administrator/administratrix?
ANSWER: Anyone may become the executor, provided he is not disqualified under the
following conditions:
1) Minor;
2) Not resident of the Philippines; or
3) In the opinion of the court, he is unfit to execute the duties of trust by reason of
drunkenness, improvidence, or want of understanding or integrity, or by reason of
conviction of an offence involving moral turpitude.
2) Absconds;
3) Becomes insane; or
4) Becomes incapable or unsuitable to discharge the trust.
A special administrator is an officer of the court who is subject to its supervision and
control, expected to work for the best interest of the entire estate, with a view to its
smooth administration and speedy settlement.
ANSWER: These are not spelled out in the Rules of Court. Thus, the appointment should
be within the sound discretion of the court. The fundamental and legal principles
governing the choice of a regular administrator should also be taken into account in the
appointment of a special administrator.
NOTE: Only one special administrator at a time may be appointed, since the appointment
is merely temporary.
ANSWER: The special administrator’s powers are limited to the following actions:
IX TRUSTEES
A) May a trustee named in the will petition for the probate of such will?
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
(To be continued)