Método Gauss-Seidel

Iteración 1:

x 1, x 2 , x 3=0

x 1=
27−(0+0)
10 | |
x n−x i
n
2.7−0
| |
= 2.7  Ear = x x 100 % 2.7 x 100 %=100 %

x 2=
−61.5−( −3 (2.7 ) +0 )
−6 | |
=8.9  Ear =
x n−x i
xn |
x 100 % |
8.9−0
8.9
x 100 %=100 %

x 3=
−21.5−( 2.7 +8.9 )
5
=−6.62  Ear =| |
x n−x i
xn
x 100 % |
−6.62−0
−6.62 |
x 100 %=100 %

Iteración 2:

x 1=2.7, x 2=8.9 , x 3=−6.62

x 1=
27−(2 ( 8.9 ) +6.62)
10 |0.258−2.7
|
= 0.258  Ear = 0.258 x 100 %=946.51 %

x 2=
−61.5−( −3 ( 0.258 )+ 2(−6.62) )
−6 |
=7.9143  Ear =
7.9143−8.9
7.9143 |
x 100 %=12.51 %

x 3=
−21.5−( 0.258+ 7.9143 )
5
=−5.9344 Ear = |
−5.9344+6.62
−5.9344 |
x 100 %=11.56 %
Iteración 3:

x 1=0.258 , x 2=7.9143, x 3=−5.9344

x 1=
27−(2 (7.9143 )+5.9344 )
10
= 0.5237  Ear = |
0.5237−0.258
0.5237 |
x 100 %=50.73%

x 2=
−61.5−( −3 ( 0.5237 ) +2(−5.9344) )
−6
=8.5337  Ear = | 8.5337 |
8.5337−7.9143
x 100 %=7.25 %

x 3=
−21.5−( 0.5237+8.5337 )
5
=−6.1114  Ear =|−6.1114+5.9344
−6.1114 |
x 100 %=2.89 %

Iteración 4:

x 1=0.5237 , x 2=8.5337 , x 3=−6.1114

x 1=
27−(2 ( 8.5337 ) +6.1114)
10 |
= 0.4821  Ear =
0.4821−0.5237
0.4821 |x 100 %=8.62 %

x 2=
−61.5−( −3 ( 0.4821 )+2(−6.1114) )
−6 |
=7.9718 Ear =
7.9718−8.5337
7.9718 |
x 100 %=7.04 %

x 3=
−21.5−( 0.4821+7.9718 )
5
=−5.9907 Ear = |
−5.9907+6.1114
−5.9907 |
x 100 %=2.01 %

Iteración 5:

x 1=0.4821, x 2=7.9718, x 3=−5.9907

x 1=
27−(2 (7.9718 )+5.9907)
10
= 0.5065  Ear = |
0.5065−0.4821
0.5065 |
x 100 %=4.81%

x 2=
−61.5−( −3 ( 0.5065 )+ 2(−5.9907) )
−6 |
=7.9998 Ear =
−7.9998−7.9718
7.9998 |
x 100 %=0.35 %
x 3=
−21.5−( 0.5065+ 7.9998 )
5
=−6.0012 Ear = |
−6.0012+5.9907
−6.0012 |
x 100 %=0.17 %

Comparando el ejercicio con el libro de Excel MetNum tenemos que:

El conjunto uno, debido a que al hacer el proceso iterativo de recalcular las variables:
 Tendríamos que dividir entre 0 debido a que no se encuentra “y” en la segunda ecuación, provocando una
indeterminación.