Está en la página 1de 4

1 GAMS 25.1.

3 r4e34d435fbd Released Oct 30, 2018 WEX-WEI x86 64bit/MS Windows»


01/30/21 22:32:16 Page 1
2 G e n e r a l A l g e b r a i c M o d e l i n g S y s t e m
3 C o m p i l a t i o n
4
5
6 1 *Ejemplo 7.3
7 2 *Programacion clasica con restricciones.
8 3 VARIABLES
9 4 F, X, Y, L, U;
10 5 X.L = 3;
11 6 Y.L = 6;
12 7 L.L = -1.8;
13 8 Y.L = -12;
14 9 EQUATIONS
15 10 OBJ, R1, R2, R3, R4;
16 11 OBJ.. F =E= POWER(X,2) + POWER(Y,2) + L*(POWER(X - 8,2) + POWER(Y - 6,2»
) -
17 25) + U*(2*X + Y - 12);
18 12 R1.. 2*X*(L + 1) - 16*L + 2*U =E= 0;
19 13 R2.. 2*Y*(L + 1) - 12*L + U =E= 0;
20 14 R3.. POWER(X - 8,2) + POWER(Y - 6,2) - 25 =E= 0;
21 15 R4.. 2*X + Y =L= 12
22 16 MODEL EJ42 /ALL/;
23 17 SOLVE EJ42 USING NLP MINIMIZING F;
24
25
26 COMPILATION TIME = 0.000 SECONDS
27 2 MB 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd WEX-WEI
28 GAMS 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd Released Oct 30, 2018 WEX-WEI x86 64bit/MS Windows»
01/30/21 22:32:16 Page 2
29 G e n e r a l A l g e b r a i c M o d e l i n g S y s t e m
30 Equation Listing SOLVE EJ42 Using NLP From line 17
31
32
33 ---- OBJ =E=
34
35 OBJ.. F - (24)*X - (40.8)*Y - (324)*L + (18)*U =E= 0 ;
36
37 (LHS = 430.2, INFES = 430.2 ****)
38
39
40 ---- R1 =E=
41
42 R1.. - (1.6)*X - (10)*L + 2*U =E= 0 ; (LHS = 24, INFES = 24 ****)
43
44
45 ---- R2 =E=
46
47 R2.. - (1.6)*Y - (36)*L + U =E= 0 ; (LHS = 40.8, INFES = 40.8 ****)
48
49
50 ---- R3 =E=
51
52 R3.. - (10)*X - (36)*Y =E= 25 ; (LHS = 349, INFES = 324 ****)
53
54
55 ---- R4 =L=
56
57 R4.. 2*X + Y =L= 12 ; (LHS = -6)
58
59 GAMS 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd Released Oct 30, 2018 WEX-WEI x86 64bit/MS Windows»
01/30/21 22:32:16 Page 3
60 G e n e r a l A l g e b r a i c M o d e l i n g S y s t e m
61 Column Listing SOLVE EJ42 Using NLP From line 17
62
63
64 ---- F
65
66 F
67 (.LO, .L, .UP, .M = -INF, 0, +INF, 0)
68 1 OBJ
69
70
71 ---- X
72
73 X
74 (.LO, .L, .UP, .M = -INF, 3, +INF, 0)
75 (-24) OBJ
76 (-1.6) R1
77 (-10) R3
78 2 R4
79
80
81 ---- Y
82
83 Y
84 (.LO, .L, .UP, .M = -INF, -12, +INF, 0)
85 (-40.8) OBJ
86 (-1.6) R2
87 (-36) R3
88 1 R4
89
90
91 ---- L
92
93 L
94 (.LO, .L, .UP, .M = -INF, -1.8, +INF, 0)
95 (-324) OBJ
96 (-10) R1
97 (-36) R2
98
99
1 00 ---- U
1 01
1 02 U
1 03 (.LO, .L, .UP, .M = -INF, 0, +INF, 0)
1 04 (18) OBJ
1 05 2 R1
1 06 1 R2
1 07
1 08 GAMS 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd Released Oct 30, 2018 WEX-WEI x86 64bit/MS Windows»
01/30/21 22:32:16 Page 4
1 09 G e n e r a l A l g e b r a i c M o d e l i n g S y s t e m
110 Model Statistics SOLVE EJ42 Using NLP From line 17
1 11
1 12
113 MODEL STATISTICS
1 14
115 BLOCKS OF EQUATIONS 5 SINGLE EQUATIONS 5
116 BLOCKS OF VARIABLES 5 SINGLE VARIABLES 5
117 NON ZERO ELEMENTS 15 NON LINEAR N-Z 10
118 DERIVATIVE POOL 20 CONSTANT POOL 21
119 CODE LENGTH 52
1 20
1 21
122 GENERATION TIME = 0.031 SECONDS
1 23 3 MB 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd WEX-WEI
1 24
1 25
126 EXECUTION TIME = 0.031 SECONDS
1 27 3 MB 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd WEX-WEI
128 GAMS 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd Released Oct 30, 2018 WEX-WEI x86 64bit/MS Windows»
01/30/21 22:32:16 Page 5
1 29 G e n e r a l A l g e b r a i c M o d e l i n g S y s t e m
130 Solution Report SOLVE EJ42 Using NLP From line 17
1 31
1 32
1 33 S O L V E S U M M A R Y
1 34
1 35 MODEL EJ42 OBJECTIVE F
1 36 TYPE NLP DIRECTION MINIMIZE
1 37 SOLVER CONOPT FROM LINE 17
1 38
139 **** SOLVER STATUS 1 Normal Completion
140 **** MODEL STATUS 2 Locally Optimal
141 **** OBJECTIVE VALUE 45.0000
1 42
143 RESOURCE USAGE, LIMIT 0.000 1000.000
144 ITERATION COUNT, LIMIT 13 2000000000
145 EVALUATION ERRORS 0 0
146 CONOPT 3 28.2.0 r750fa45 Released Aug 19, 2019 WEI x86 64bit/MS Windo»
w
1 47
1 48
1 49 C O N O P T 3 version 3.17K
1 50 Copyright (C) ARKI Consulting and Development A/S
1 51 Bagsvaerdvej 246 A
1 52 DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark
1 53
1 54
1 55 The model has 5 variables and 5 constraints
1 56 with 15 Jacobian elements, 10 of which are nonlinear.
1 57 The Hessian of the Lagrangian has 2 elements on the diagonal,
1 58 4 elements below the diagonal, and 4 nonlinear variables.
1 59
1 60 Pre-triangular equations: 0
1 61 Post-triangular equations: 1
1 62
1 63
164 ** Optimal solution. Reduced gradient less than tolerance.
1 65
1 66
167 CONOPT time Total 0.003 seconds
1 68 of which: Function evaluations 0.002 = 66.7%
1 69 1st Derivative evaluations 0.000 = 0.0%
1 70
1 71
1 72 LOWER LEVEL UPPER MARGINAL
1 73
174 ---- EQU OBJ . . . 1.000
175 ---- EQU R1 . . . EPS
176 ---- EQU R2 . . . EPS
177 ---- EQU R3 25.000 25.000 25.000 EPS
178 ---- EQU R4 -INF 12.000 12.000 EPS
1 79
1 80 LOWER LEVEL UPPER MARGINAL
1 81
182 ---- VAR F -INF 45.000 +INF .
183 ---- VAR X -INF 3.000 +INF .
184 ---- VAR Y -INF 6.000 +INF .
185 ---- VAR L -INF -1.800 +INF .
1 86 ---- VAR U -INF -12.000 +INF .
1 87
1 88
1 89 **** REPORT SUMMARY : 0 NONOPT
1 90 0 INFEASIBLE
1 91 0 UNBOUNDED
1 92 0 ERRORS
1 93
1 94
1 95 EXECUTION TIME = 0.000 SECONDS
1 96 2 MB 25.1.3 r4e34d435fbd WEX-WEI
1 97
1 98
1 99 USER: CS 635 Spring 2014 G140121/0001AO-GEN
2 00 Prof. Michael Ferris, University of Wisconsin-Madison DC2937
2 01 License for teaching and research at degree granting institutions
2 02
2 03
2 04 **** FILE SUMMARY
2 05
2 06 Input E:\GAMS\EJERCICIO_3.gms
2 07 Output C:\Users\DIEGO\Documents\gamsdir\projdir\EJERCICIO_3.lst

También podría gustarte