M Transporte Arzate Quintero L3

UAEM FACULTAD DE CONTADURÍA Y
ADMINISTRACIÓN
LIC. EN CONTADURÍA
ALUMNO: ARZATE QUINTERO JORGE LUIS
PROFESOR: JUAN MANUEL
MÉTODOS DE TRANSPORTE
GRUPO: L3 2do SEMESTRE
27 DE MAYO DEL 2020

Ejercicio 1
El problema consiste en enviar rollos de tela de lino desde Cd. Valle, Tampico y Ébano y se
pretenden enviar a Querétaro, Monterrey, Veracruz y Zacatecas.
Costos mínimos
Construccion del modelo:
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
(A)= Cd. Valle (B)= Tampico (C)= Ebano
Destinos
(1)= Queretaro (2)= Monterrey (3)= Veracruz (4)= Zacatecas
Funcion objetivo
Min Z= 4XA1 + 7XA2 + 5XA3 + 9XA4 + 6XB1 + 4XB2 + 8XB3 + 5XB4 + 4XC1 + 6XC2 + 6XC3 + 8XC4
Restricciones:
Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

(1) Queretaro >= 2000 (A) Cd. Valle <= 4000
(2) Monterrey >= 4500 (B) Tampico <= 5000
(3) Veracruz >= 3000 (C)Ebano <= 3000
(4) Zacatecas >= 2500
Queretaro
$4.0
Cd. valle $7.0
$5.0
$9.0
Monterrey
$6.0
Tampico $4.0
$8.0
$5.0
Veracruz
$4.0
$6.0
Ebano $6.0
$8.0
Zacatecas
Solución :
Costo unitario de/a : (1) Queretaro (2) Monterrey (3) Veracruz (4) Zacatecas
(A) Cd. Valle $ 4.00 $ 7.00 $ 5.00 $ 9.00
(B) Tampico $ 6.00 $ 4.00 $ 8.00 $ 5.00
(C)Ebano $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 8.00
Costo unitario de/a : (1) Queretaro (2) Monterrey (3) Veracruz (4) Zacatecas Total Dispon/ Oferta
(A) Cd. Valle 3,000 1,000 4,000 <= 4000
(B) Tampico 4,500 500 5,000 <= 5000
(C)Ebano 2,000 1,000 3,000 <= 3000
Total: 2,000 4,500 3,000 2,500
Requerido/Demanda >= 2000 >= 4500 >= 3000 >= 2500
Costo total de/a : (1) Queretaro (2) Monterrey (3) Veracruz (4) Zacatecas Total
(A) Cd. Valle - - 15,000 9,000 24,000
(B) Tampico - 18,000 - 2,500 20,500
(C)Ebano 8,000 - - 8,000 16,000
Total: 8,000 18,000 15,000 19,500 60,500
Funcion solucion:
Min Z= 3000XA3 + 1000XA4 + 4500XB2 + 500XB4 + 2000XC1 + 1000XC4
Queretaro
Cd. valle
$3,000
$1,000
Monterrey
Cd. valle $4,500

Veracruz
$500
$2,000
Ebano
$1,000
Zacatecas
Esquina Noroeste
Construccion del modelo
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
Destinos
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(3) Veracruz >= 3000 (C)Ebano <= 3000
Queretaro
$4.0
Cd. valle $7.0
$5.0
$9.0
Monterrey
$6.0
Tampico $4.0
$8.0
$5.0
Veracruz
$4.0
$6.0
Ebano $6.0
$8.0
Zacatecas
Solución
(A) Cd. Valle $ 4.00 $ 7.00 $ 5.00 $ 9.00
(B) Tampico $ 6.00 $ 4.00 $ 8.00 $ 5.00
(C)Ebano $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 8.00
(A) Cd. Valle 2,000 2,000 4,000 <= 4000
(B) Tampico 2,500 2,500 5,000 <= 5000
(C)Ebano 500 2,500 3,000 <= 3000
Total: 2,000 4,500 3,000 2,500
(A) Cd. Valle 8,000 14,000 - - 22,000
(B) Tampico - 10,000 20,000 - 30,000
(C)Ebano - - 3,000 20,000 23,000
Total: 8,000 24,000 23,000 20,000 75,000
Funcion solucion;
Min Z= 2000XA1 + 2000XA2 + 2500XB2 +2500XB3 +500XC3 + 2500XC4
Queretaro
$2,000.0
Cd. valle $2,000.0
Monterre
Tampico $2,500.0
$2,500.0
Veracruz
Ebano $500.0
$2,500.0
Zacatecas
Aproximación de Vogel
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
Destinos
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(3) Veracruz >= 3000 (C)Ebano <= 3000
Queretaro
$4.0
Cd. valle $7.0
$5.0
$9.0
Monterrey
$6.0
Tampico $4.0
$8.0
$5.0
Veracruz
$4.0
$6.0
Ebano $6.0
$8.0
Zacatecas
Solución
(A) Cd. Valle $ 4.00 $ 7.00 $ 5.00 $ 9.00
(B) Tampico $ 6.00 $ 4.00 $ 8.00 $ 5.00
(C)Ebano $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 8.00
(A) Cd. Valle 2,000 2,000 4,000 <= 4000
(B) Tampico 2,500 2,500 5,000 <= 5000
(C)Ebano 2,000 1,000 3,000 <= 3000
Total: 2,000 4,500 3,000 2,500
(A) Cd. Valle 8,000 - 10,000 - 18,000
(B) Tampico - 10,000 - 12,500 22,500
(C)Ebano - 12,000 6,000 - 18,000
Total: 8,000 22,000 16,000 12,500 58,500
Funcion solucion;
Min Z= 2000XA1 + 2000XA2 + 2500XB2 +2500XB3 +2000XC2 + 1000XC3
Queretaro
$2,000.0
Cd. valle
$2,000.0
Monterre
Tampico $2,500.0
$2,500.0
Veracruz
$2,000.0
Ebano $1,000.0
Zacatecas
Solver
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
Destinos
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(3) Veracruz >= 3000 (C)Ebano <= 3000
Queretaro
$4.0
Cd. valle $7.0
$5.0
$9.0
Monterrey
$6.0
Tampico $4.0
$8.0
$5.0
Veracruz
$4.0
$6.0
Ebano $6.0
$8.0
Zacatecas
(A) Cd. Valle $ 4.00 $ 7.00 $ 5.00 $ 9.00
(B) Tampico $ 6.00 $ 4.00 $ 8.00 $ 5.00
(C)Ebano $ 4.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 8.00
(A) Cd. Valle 1,000 - 3,000 - 4,000 4,000
(B) Tampico - 2,500 - 2,500 5,000 5,000
(C)Ebano 1,000 2,000 - - 3,000 3,000
Total: 2,000 4,500 3,000 2,500
Requerido/Demanda 2,000 4,500 3,000 2,500
(A) Cd. Valle 4,000 - 15,000 - 19,000
(B) Tampico - 10,000 - 12,500 22,500
(C)Ebano 4,000 12,000 - - 16,000
Total: 8,000 22,000 15,000 12,500 57,500
Funcion solucion
Min Z= 1,000XA1 + 3,000XA3 + 2,500XB2 + 2,500XB4 + 1,000XC1 + 2,000XC2
Quereta
$1,000.0
Cd.
$3,000.0
Monterr
Tampico $2,500.0
$2,500.0
Veracruz
$1,000.0
$2,000.0
Ebano
Zacatecas
Ejercicio 2:
Una firma de generadores fabrica un producto de esta clase desde tres plantas hasta
cuatro centros de distribución. Dicha compañía tiene operaciones de produccion en
Cleveland Ohio, Bedford Indiana y en York Pensilvania. Las capacidades de produccion de
estas tres plantas para el siguiente periodo de planeación de tres meses y un tipo
especifico de generadores son los siguientes.
Costos mínimos
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
(A)= Cleveland Ohio (B)= Bedford Indiana(C)= York Pensilvania
Destinos
(1)= Boston (2)= Chicago (3)= San Luis (4)= Lexington
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(1) Boston >= 6000 (A) Cleveland Ohio <= 5000
(2) Chicago >= 4000 (B) Bedford Indiana <= 6000
(3) San Luis >= 2000 (C)York Pensilvania <= 2500
(4) Lexington >= 1500
Boston
Cleveland $3.0
Ohio $2.0
$7.0
$6.0
Chicago
$7.0
Bedford $5.0
Indiana
$2.0
$3.0
San Luis
$2.0
$5.0
York $4.0
Pensilvania $5.0
Lexington
Costo unitario de/a : (1) Boston (2) Chicago (3) San Luis (4) Lexington
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 3.00 $ 2.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.00
(B) Bedford Indiana $ 7.00 $ 5.00 $ 2.00 $ 3.00
(C)York Pensilvania $ 2.00 $ 5.00 $ 4.00 $ 5.00
Costo unitario de/a : (1) Boston (2) Chicago (3) San Luis (4) Lexington Total Dispon/ Oferta
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00 5,000 <= 5,000
(B) Bedford Indiana $ 2,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,500.00 6,000 <= 6,000
(C)York Pensilvania $ 2,500.00 2,500 <= 2,500
Total: 6,000 4,000 2,000 1,500
Requerido/Demanda >= 6,000 >= 4,000 >= 2,000 >= 1,500
Costo total de/a : (1) Boston (2) Chicago (3) San Luis (4) Lexington Total
(A) Cleveland Ohio 3,000 8,000 - - 11,000
(B) Bedford Indiana 17,500 - 4,000 4,500 26,000
(C)York Pensilvania 5,000 - - - 5,000
Total: 25,500 8,000 4,000 4,500 42,000
Funcion solucion:
Min Z= 1000XA1 + 4000XA2 + 2500XB1 + 2000XB3 + 1500XB4 +2500XC1
Boston
Cleveland $1,000.0
Ohio $4,000.0
Chicago
$2,500.0
Bedford $2,000.0
Indiana
$1,500.0
San Luis
York $2,500.0
Pensilvania
Lexington
Esquina Noroeste
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
Destinos
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

Boston
Cleveland $3.0
Ohio $2.0
$7.0
$6.0
Chicago
$7.0
Bedford $5.0
Indiana
$2.0
$3.0
San Luis
$2.0
$5.0
York $4.0
Pensilvania $5.0
Lexington
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 3.00 $ 2.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.00
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 5,000.00 5,000 <= 5,000
(C)York Pensilvania $ 1,000.00 $ 1,500.00 2,500 <= 2,500
Total: 6,000 4,000 2,000 1,500
(A) Cleveland Ohio 15,000 - - - 15,000
(B) Bedford Indiana 7,000 20,000 2,000 - 29,000
(C)York Pensilvania - - 4,000 7,500 11,500
Total: 22,000 20,000 6,000 7,500 55,500
Funcion solucion
Min Z= 5000XA1 + 1000XB1 + 4000XB2 + 1000XB3 + 1000XC3 + 1500XC4
Boston
Cleveland $5,000.0
Ohio
Chicago
$1,000.0
Bedford $4,000.0
Indiana
$1,000.0
San Luis
York $1,000.0
Pensilvania $1,500.0
Lexington
Método de Aproximación de Vogel
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
Destinos
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

Boston
Cleveland $3.0
Ohio $2.0
$7.0
$6.0
Chicago
$7.0
Bedford $5.0
Indiana
$2.0
$3.0
San Luis
$2.0
$5.0
York $4.0
Pensilvania $5.0
Lexington
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 3.00 $ 2.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.00
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00 5,000 <= 5,000
(C)York Pensilvania $ 2,500.00 2,500 <= 2,500
Total: 6,000 4,000 2,000 1,500
(A) Cleveland Ohio 3,000 8,000 - - 11,000
(B) Bedford Indiana 17,500 - 4,000 4,500 26,000
Total: 25,500 8,000 4,000 4,500 42,000
Pd. Obtuve los mismos resultados que en el Método de costos mínimos

Funcion solucion:
Min Z= 1000XA1 + 4000XA2 + 2500XB1 + 2000XB3 + 1500XB4 +2500XC1
Boston
Cleveland $1,000.0
Ohio $4,000.0
Chicago
$2,500.0
Bedford $2,000.0
Indiana
$1,500.0
San Luis
York $2,500.0
Pensilvania
Lexington
Solver
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
Destinos
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

Boston
Cleveland $3.0
Ohio $2.0
$7.0
$6.0
Chicago
$7.0
Bedford $5.0
Indiana
$2.0
$3.0
San Luis
$2.0
$5.0
York $4.0
Pensilvania $5.0
Lexington
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 3.00 $ 2.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.00
Costo unitario de/a : (1) Boston (2) Chicago (3) San Luis (4) LexingtonTotal Dispon/ Oferta
(A) Cleveland Ohio $ 3,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ - $ - 5,000 5,000
(B) Bedford Indiana $ - $ 2,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,500.00 6,000 6,000
(C)York Pensilvania $ 2,500.00 $ - $ - $ - 2,500 2,500
Total: 6,000 4,000 2,000 1,500
Requerido/Demanda 6,000 4,000 2,000 1,500
Costo total de/a : (1) Boston (2) Chicago (3) San Luis (4) LexingtonTotal
(A) Cleveland Ohio 10,500 3,000 - - 13,500
(B) Bedford Indiana - 12,500 4,000 4,500 21,000
Total: 15,500 15,500 4,000 4,500 39,500
Funcion objetivo
Min Z= 3,500XA1 + 1,500XA2 + 2,500XB2 + 2,000XB3 + 1,500XB4 + 2,500XC1
Boston
Cleveland $3,500.0
Ohio $1,500.0
Chicago
$2,500.0
Bedford
Indiana
$2,000.0
$1,500.0
San Luis
York $2,500.0
Pensilvania
Lexingto
Ejercicio 3:
Una empresa manufacturera, elabora sus produccion a tres fábricas y las distribuye a
cinco centros de consumo. La gama de produccion son productos semejantes, que se
diferencian por color, presentación y modificaciones en el diseño, cuyas tasas de consumo
son aproximadamente iguales. La demanda agregada en los productos en kilogramo por
semana en cada centro de consumo, la tasa de produccion agregada en kilogramos
elaborados por semana en cada centro de produccion y los costos unitarios de transporte
se muestran en la tabla I, se requiere el plan óptimo de distribución.
Costos minimos
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
(A)= PP1 (B)= PP2 (C)= PP3
Destinos
(1)= CC1 (2)= CC2 (3)= CC3 (4)= CC4
Funcion objetivo
Min Z= 65XA1 + 70XA2 + 68XA3 +63XA4 + 62XA5 + 63XB1 + 68XB2 + 61XB3 + 71XB4 + 60XB5 + 60XC1 + 63XC2 + 69XC3 + 64XC4 + 69XC5
Restricciones:

(1) CC1 >= 15,500 (A) PP1 <= 26,500
(2) CC2 >= 16,900 (B) PP2 <= 28,700
(3) CC3 >= 18,300 (C)PP3 <= 24,800
(4) CC4 >= 14,500
(5) CC5 >= 14,800
CC1
65
PP1
70
68
62 CC2
63
63
PP2 68
61 CC3
71
60
60
63 CC4
69
PP3
64
69 CC5
Costo unitario(1)de/a
CC1: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5
(A) PP1 65 70 68 63 62
(B) PP2 63 68 61 71 60
(C)PP3 60 63 69 64 69
CC1: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total Dispon/ Oferta
(A) PP1 7,600 14,500 4,400 26,500 <= 26,500
(B) PP2 18,300 10,400 28,700 <= 28,700
(C)PP3 15,500 9,300 24,800 <= 24,800
Total: 15,500 16,900 18,300 14,500 14,800
Requerido/Demanda
>= 15,500 >= 16,900 >= 18,300 >= 14,500 >= 14,800
- - - - -
CC1: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total
(A) PP1 - 532,000 - 913,500 272,800 1,718,300
(B) PP2 - - 1,116,300 - 624,000 1,740,300
(C)PP3 930,000 585,900 - - - 1,515,900
Total: 930,000 1,117,900 1,116,300 913,500 896,800 4,974,500
Funcion solucion:
Min Z= 7,600XA2 +14,500XA4 + 4,400XA5 + 18,300XB3 + 10,400XB5 + 15,500XC1 + 9,300XC2
CC1
PP1
7,600
4400 CC2
14500
PP2
18300
CC3
10400
15500
9300 CC4
PP3
CC5
Esquina noroeste
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
(A)= PP1 (B)= PP2 (C)= PP3
Destinos
(1)= CC1 (2)= CC2 (3)= CC3 (4)= CC4
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(1) CC1 >= 15,500 (A) PP1 <= 26,500
(2) CC2 >= 16,900 (B) PP2 <= 28,700
(3) CC3 >= 18,300 (C)PP3 <= 24,800
(4) CC4 >= 14,500
(5) CC5 >= 14,800
CC1
65
PP1
70
68
62 CC2
63
63
PP2 68
61 CC3
71
60
60
63 CC4
69
PP3
64
69 CC5
Costo unitario de/a
(1) CC1
: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5
(A) PP1 65 70 68 63 62
(B) PP2 63 68 61 71 60
(C)PP3 60 63 69 64 69
Costo unitario de/a

(1) CC1
: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total Dispon/ Oferta
(A) PP1 15,500 11,000 26,500 <= 26,500
(B) PP2 5,900 18,300 4,500 28,700 <= 28,700
(C)PP3 10,000 14,800 24,800 <= 24,800
Total: 15,500 16,900 18,300 14,500 14,800
Requerido/Demanda>= 15,500 >= 16,900 >= 18,300 >= 14,500 >= 14,800
- - - - -
Costo unitario de/a

(1) CC1
: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total
(A) PP1 1,007,500 770,000 - - - 1,777,500
(B) PP2 - 401,200 1,116,300 319,500 - 1,837,000
(C)PP3 - - - 640,000 1,021,200 1,661,200
Total: 1,007,500 1,171,200 1,116,300 959,500 1,021,200 5,275,700
Funcion solucion
Min Z= 15,500XA1 + 11,000XA2 +5,900XB2 + 18,300XB3 + 4,500XB4 + 10,000XC4 + 14,800XC5
CC1
15500
PP1
11000
CC2
5900
PP2
18300
CC3
4500
CC4
PP3
10000
14800 CC5
Metodo de aproximación de voguel
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
(A)= PP1 (B)= PP2 (C)= PP3
Destinos
(1)= CC1 (2)= CC2 (3)= CC3 (4)= CC4
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(1) CC1 >= 15,500 (A) PP1 <= 26,500
(2) CC2 >= 16,900 (B) PP2 <= 28,700
(3) CC3 >= 18,300 (C)PP3 <= 24,800
(4) CC4 >= 14,500
(5) CC5 >= 14,800
CC1
65
PP1
70
68
62 CC2
63
63
PP2 68
61 CC3
71
60
60
63 CC4
69
PP3
64
69 CC5
CC1: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5
(A) PP1 65 70 68 63 62
(B) PP2 63 68 61 71 60
(C)PP3 60 63 69 64 69
CC1: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total Dispon/ Oferta
(A) PP1 14,500 12,000 26,500 <= 26,500
(B) PP2 7,600 18,300 2,800 28,700 <= 28,700
(C)PP3 7,900 16,900 24,800 <= 24,800
Total: 15,500 16,900 18,300 14,500 14,800
Requerido/Demanda
>= 15,500 >= 16,900 >= 18,300 >= 14,500 >= 14,800
- - - - -
CC1: (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total
(A) PP1 - - - 913,500 744,000 1,657,500
(B) PP2 478,800 - 1,116,300 - 168,000 1,763,100
(C)PP3 474,000 1,064,700 - - - 1,538,700
Total: 952,800 1,064,700 1,116,300 913,500 912,000 4,959,300
Funcion objetivo
Min Z= 14,500XA4 + 12000XA5 + 7600XB1 + 18300XB3 + 2800XB5 +7900XC1 + 16900XC2
CC1
PP1
12000 14500
CC2
7600
PP2
18300 CC3
2800
7900
CC4
16900
PP3
CC5
Solver
Variables:
Fuentes de origen
(A)= PP1 (B)= PP2 (C)= PP3
Destinos
(1)= CC1 (2)= CC2 (3)= CC3 (4)= CC4
Funcion objetivo
Restricciones:

(1) CC1 >= 15,500 (A) PP1 <= 26,500
(2) CC2 >= 16,900 (B) PP2 <= 28,700
(3) CC3 >= 18,300 (C)PP3 <= 24,800
(4) CC4 >= 14,500
(5) CC5 >= 14,800
CC1
65
PP1
70
68
62 CC2
63
63
PP2 68
61 CC3
71
60
60
63 CC4
69
PP3
64
69 CC5
Solución
Costo unitario de/a : (1) CC1 (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5
(A) PP1 65 70 68 63 62
(B) PP2 63 68 61 71 60
(C)PP3 60 63 69 64 69
Costo unitario de/a : (1) CC1 (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total Dispon/ Oferta
(A) PP1 7,600 0 0 14,500 4,400 26,500 26,500
(B) PP2 0 0 18,300 0 10,400 28,700 28,700
(C)PP3 7,900 16,900 0 0 0 24,800 24,800
Total: 15,500 16,900 18,300 14,500 14,800
Requerido/Demanda 15500 16900 18300 14500 14800
- - - - -
Costo unitario de/a : (1) CC1 (2) CC2 (3) CC3 (4) CC4 (5) CC5 Total
(A) PP1 494,000 - - 913,500 272,800 1,680,300
(B) PP2 - - 1,116,300 - 624,000 1,740,300
(C)PP3 474,000 1,064,700 - - - 1,538,700
Total: 968,000 1,064,700 1,116,300 913,500 896,800 4,959,300
Funcion objetivo
Min Z= 7,600XA1 + 14,500XA4 + 4,400XA5 + 18,300XB3 + 10,400XB5 + 7,900XC1 +16,900XC2
CC1
PP1 7,600
4400 CC2
14500
PP2
18300
CC3
10400
7,900n CC4
16,900
PP3
CC5

M Transporte Arzate Quintero L3

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

También podría gustarte

M Transporte Arzate Quintero L3

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

M Transporte Arzate Quintero L3

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

UAEM FACULTAD DE CONTADURÍA Y

ALUMNO: ARZATE QUINTERO JORGE LUIS

PROFESOR: JUAN MANUEL

GRUPO: L3 2do SEMESTRE

27 DE MAYO DEL 2020

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Cd. valle $4,500

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Construccion del modelo

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Pd. Obtuve los mismos resultados que en el Método de costos mínimos

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Costo unitario de/a

Costo unitario de/a

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

Demanda de rollos de tela de lino Oferta de rollos de tela de lino

También podría gustarte