Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Las informaciones y conceptos expresados en esta conferencia se hacen con el propósito de divulgar e informar de
manera general sobre los temas relacionados con el concreto
concreto..
ASOCRETO no es nii pretende t d ser asesor ded proyectos
t específicos
específicos.
ífi . Cualquier
C l i dudad d en relación
l ió con obras
b específicas
ífi
debe ser consultada por el interesado con los diseñadores e interventores de la respectiva obra.
obra.
El uso que se haga de las informaciones y conceptos aquí expresados no conllevan responsabilidad alguna para
ASOCRETO ni para los conferencistas, ya que debe ser utilizada por personas idóneas bajo su responsabilidad y
criterio.. Esta información no sustituye las funciones y obligaciones de las personas contractualmente responsables de
criterio
la concepción, ejecución y vigilancia de los respectivos proyectos
proyectos.. Los conceptos expresados no son asesoría para
una obra en particular
particular..
Ninguna parte de esta conferencia puede ser reproducida, almacenada en sistema recuperable o transmitida en
ninguna forma por medio magnético, mecánico, fotocopia, grabación u otros, sin previa autorización escrita de
ASOCRETO..
ASOCRETO
AGENDA
• Recycling Process and
Procedure
• Cement-Modified Soils
(CMS)
• Soil-Cement
• Recycling using cement
• Machines Required for the
Job
• Conclusions and
Recommendations
Old Way of Recuperating a
Pavement
A Very Expensive and Long
Process
Full-Depth
p Reclamation
• Proceso que da
resultados
l d económicos
ó i
y de calidad
• Alternativa de
mantenimiento de
crecimiento rápido
• Se adapta a los criterios
actuales de diseños de
M&R
What is FDR?
• A Full Depth Reclamation is a pavement rehabilitation technique in
which the full flexible pavement section and a pre
pre-determined
determined portion
of the underlying materials are uniformly crushed, pulverized or
blended, resulting in a stabilized base course (SBC); further
stabilization may be obtained through the use of available additives.
Comparison
• FDR is distinguished from other
rehabilitation techniques such
as Cold Planing, Cold In-Place
Recycling and Hot InIn-Place
Place
Recycling by the fact that the
rotor or cutting head always
penetrates completely through
the existing asphalt layer and
into the underlying base, sub-
base or sub-grade layers.
FDR Candidates
• Flexible Pavement
Structures
– Parking Lots
– Low Volume,
Secondary Roads
– City Streets
– Medium Volume
Roadways
– Interstate
Highways
– Private and
Regional Airports
FDR Candidates
• Fisuras profundas
• Fisuras reflectivas
• Bacheos
• Surcos profundos
• Formato parabólico
(Medialuna)
• Base con pobre
resistencia
Existing Conditions
Photo of hardened AC surface
FDR S
Six Main S
Steps
p
1. Analyze
y existing g materials
2. Pulverize Existing Pavement
3
3. Introduce Additive and Mix
4. Shape the Mixed Material
5
5. C
Compact t
6. Apply a Wearing Course
FDR Scope
S p
1 Mixing
1.Mixing
2.Grading
3 C
3.Compaction
ti
FDR Process
• Core Equipment
– Road
R dRReclaimer
l i
– Motor Grader
– C
Compactors
t
– Vibratory Pad-foot
– P
Pneumatic
ti
– Vibratory/Static
Smooth Drum
– Water Truck
FDR Process
• Supplemental Equipment
– Dump Trucks/Stone Spreader
– A h lt Di
Asphalt Distributor/Tanker
t ib t /T k
– Bulk Pneumatic Tankers
– Calibrated Spreading Units
– y Equipment
Slurry q pm
FDR Process
• Construction Sequence
–V
Varies
i b based
d
upon scope of
project and
stabilizers being
used
• Single Pass
Reclamation
• Multiple Pass
Reclamation
Single
g Pass Reclamation
1st Pass
Working Direction
Single Pass Reclamation
Secondary Roads
• Roads designed
g for
low traffic
• The opportunity for
secondary roads is
g world wide.
big
• Ideal candidates to
be reinforced and
widened
Single Pass Reclamation
• Pulverize the existing pavement and
underlying layers,
layers simultaneously add and
mix various stabilizing additives, if
needed.
needed
• Fine grade and compact the SBC.
• Fog seal or prime the SBC, as required.
• Apply
A l ththe specified
ifi d surface
f ttreatment.
t t
Single
g Pass Reclamation
• Typically used when -
– Performing simple pulverization
(No stabilizing
(N z ng additives are
r being
ng u
used))
– Existing asphalt is relatively thin
(6” or less),
(6 less) when using stabilizing additives
– Major cross-slope/profile grade
corrections are not necessary
Multi-Pass Reclamation
Liquid
q Additive System
y
Working Direction
Virgin Aggregate
Multi-Pass Reclamation
2nd Pass
Liquid Additive System
Working Direction
Granular Material or
Chemical Additive
Multi-Pass Reclamation
Urban Road are Candidates for Multi-Pass reclamation
airports,
i t shoulders,
h ld and
d materials-handling
t i l h dli
pavement.
Definition, continue
• Laboratory and field work on CMS indicate
that the relatively small quantities of cement
bi d some off th
bind the soil/aggregate
il/ t particles
ti l
together to form small conglomerate masses
of new soil/aggregate.
used.
d DDuring
i construction,
t ti tests
t t are
being met.
d
durability.
bili No
N guesswork
k is
i involved.
i l d
How is Soil-Cement Built?
• There are four steps in mixed-in-place
curing.
material is commonly
y used to prevent
p
mat is used.
Why Use Soil-Cement?
• Failing granular-base pavements, with or without their old bituminous
mats,, can be salvaged,
g , strengthened,
g , and reclaimed as soil-cement
pavements. This is an efficient, economical way of rebuilding pavements.
Since approximately 90% of the material used is already in place,
handling and hauling costs are cut to a minimum
minimum. Many granular and
waste materials from quarries and gravel pits can also be used to make
soil-cement; thus high-grade materials are conserved for other
purposes.
• Old soil-cement pavements in all parts of the continent are still giving good service
y state in the Untied
at low maintenance costs. Soil-cement has been used in every
States and in all Canadian provinces. Specimens taken from roads show that the
strength of soil-cement actually increases with age; some specimens were four
times as strong as test specimens made when the roads were first opened to
traffic. This reserve strength accounts in part for soil-cement’s good long-term
performance.
Is Soil-Cement Economical?
Cement-Modified Soils (CMS)
• A cement-modified soil (CMS) is
a soil material that has been
treated with a relatively small
proportion of portland cement –
l
less cement than
h is
i required
i d to
produce hardened soil-cement.
The objective of the treatment
is to amend undesirable
properties of problem soils or
substandard materials so that
they are suitable for use in
construction.
Cement-Modified Soils (CMS)
• The improvement in engineering properties of a soil due to the
addition of small quantities of cement can be measured in several;
ways including:
• Truck mounted
units can be
large enough to
hold a full tanker,
i.e.,, 27 tons.
The spreader Auger
• The spreader
p
auger (8, 10 or 12
ft wide) with
tapered
openings delivers
a level
l l pattern,
tt up
to 100 lb / sq.yd.
Preparing a Country Road
• Preparing
p g a countyy
road for reclamation.
Target rate: 25 lb /
sq.yd.
25 Ton hopper with lots of
flotation.
The basic Spreader
• The Stoltz Site Spreader uses a
30" wide
id d
drag chain
h i tto unload
l d
into the spreading auger. The
gate opening over the chain
determines the rate per sq.ft.
The level pattern is obtained by
adjusting slots under the auger
trough.
Spreader basic Components
•T
Typical
i l CCompaction
ti
Sequence
– Initial (breakdown)
• Single Drum Vibratory
• Pad
Pad-foot
foot Compactor
Compacting The Recycled
Material
• It should be right after
th RM if using
the i emulsion
l i
• Right after the asphalt
emulsion
l i iis applied
li d
• Typical sequence:
– initial
i iti l ((compression)
i )
– Intermediate
– Final
Compaction is Critical !!
• Typical Compaction
Sequence
– Intermediate
• 25
25-30
30 T
Ton n Rubb
Rubber
Tire Roller
• or Smooth Single or
Double
• Drum Vibratory
Compactor
Compaction is Critical !!
• Typical Compaction
Sequence
– Finish
• Single or Double
Drum Roller
• Operating in
Static Mode
Spreading the Recuperated
Material
• Se realiza después
de la compactación
inicial
• La conformacion
final ocurre trás el
establecimiento de
la corona y
pendiente y luego
de completada toda
la compactación
• El material sobrante
debe ser retirado
Quality
y Control
• Granulometria
• Contenido de aditivo
• Contenido de
humedad
• Uniformidad de la
Mezcla
• Compactación
• Grueso de la capa
• Superficie
p terminada
Quality Control Work
Chart
Quality Assurance Buyer
Organization Agency
Seller
Contractor
RM-300 RM-500
22 675 kg (50,000 lbs) Operating Weight (ROPS) 27 210 kg (60,000 lbs)
457 mm (18'') Max. mixing
M i i d depth
th reclamation
l ti 457 mm (18'')
508 mm (20 '') Max. mixing depth stabilization 508 mm (20'')
261 kW (350 hp) Gross Power 403 kW (540 hp)
RM-300 & RM-500
RM-300 RM-500
• Soil:
max. depth 508 mm (20")
– soil stabilization
– replaceable weld-on holders
– 238 point-attack
p cutting
g tools
Universal Rotor Option
• Can be used for soil
stabilization or full
depth reclamation
• 200 point-attack tools
with bolt
bolt-on
on breakaway
tool holders
• Kicker paddles placed
on every stand-off
• Triple-tree tool
placement on rotor
ends for improved side
cutting
• Breaker bar included
f iincreased
for d gradation
d i
Soil Rotor Option
• Primary use in soil
stabilization
• Secondary use in
asphalt
reclamation
• 238 point-attack
tools with heavy-
duty tool holders
• One-piece cast
stand-off can be
easily replaced
• Replaceable end
rings protect
mandrel
d l
Combination Rotor
Option • Primary use in soil
stabilization
• Secondary
d use in
i light
li h
cuts of asphalt
reclamation
• Gradation performance
will be less than the
universal or soil rotor
• 114 point-attack tools
with bolt-on
breakawayy tool
holders
• Replaceable end rings
protect mandrel
Rotor Type
• One Rotor Type For All • Three Different Rotor For Different Application
Application
• Optimal Performance And Homogeneous Mix
• Poor Mix Quality
• Easy to Replace Side Cutters
• Hard To Replace
Side Cutters
Mixing Chamber
• Chamber volume
Break Bar increases with deeper
cut for better mixing
• Adjustable rear door
and Break Bar for
gradation
d controll
• Automatic depth
control maintains
Asphat Reclaimed
M t i l
Material
Base precise depth*
• Hydraulically operated
Universal Rotor Shown
f
front
t door*
d *
*Optional • Bi-directional mixing
capability
Serviceability
Mix Quality
Rubber flaps
p as rear door unable to retain Steel rear door holds material in the mixingg
asphalt slab and material in the chamber chamber longer for a better mix. Better
long enough for a good mix. gradation.
Mix Quality
Tool Holder
Tool holder with recess bolt which Break away tool holder with tapered
requires very high fastening torque. sole. Tool holder remain in place even
Difficult and time consuming to when bolt falls off. Holder is wedged
replace.Bolt recess usually filled with in firmer when used. Easy to replace.
asphalt after use. Half day to replace 1 full rotor.
More than a day to replace 1 rotor
Cutting Bits
Smaller steel body cannot hold tungsten Cat tools have wide body which can
tip. Tungsten tip falls off before it’s
sustain heavy steel wash
worn. Short tool life
Changing Rotor Speed
• Change Rotor Speed By
Switching Pulley At
Rotor Drive Housing
• Can-bus Controlled
• Professional
P f l Maintenance required
d
• High Maintenance Cost
• Manual Spray Nozzle
• Low
L Maintenance Cost
Sliding Cab
• Operator Cab Slide Only One
Side
CP-56 CP-74
CP-64
CP-76 y 76 XT
CS-533E
PS 150C
PS-150C PS-150C
PS 150C HW
12 940 kg (28,535 lb) Max. Weight 17 273 kg (38,000 lb)
1743 mm (69'') Rolling Width (9 wheel) 1743 mm (69'')
2134 mm (84'') Rolling
R lli Width (11 wheel)
h l) 2134 mm (84'')
75 kW (100 hp) Power 75 kW (100 hp)
9 (11 optional)
p Wheels 9 (11 optional)
p
Double Drum Asphalt
Compactors
Double Drum Asphalt
C
Compactors
t
Power Operating weight Drum Width
Model kW hp kg lb mm in