Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Presbiteriano
Presbiteriano
INVESTIGACIÓN BÁSICA
383
Document downloaded from http://www.elsevier.es/, day 14/08/2019. This copy is for personal use. Any transmission of this document by any media or format is strictly prohibited.
E. CASTILLO ET AL.
RESULTADOS
384
Document downloaded from http://www.elsevier.es/, day 14/08/2019. This copy is for personal use. Any transmission of this document by any media or format is strictly prohibited.
385
Document downloaded from http://www.elsevier.es/, day 14/08/2019. This copy is for personal use. Any transmission of this document by any media or format is strictly prohibited.
E. CASTILLO ET AL.
386
Document downloaded from http://www.elsevier.es/, day 14/08/2019. This copy is for personal use. Any transmission of this document by any media or format is strictly prohibited.
nel de Corti. A los 18–21 meses el receptor quedaría reem- Trimetazidine prevents cochlear lesions induced by intraperitoneal
plazado por un epitelio cúbico. A los 24 meses un epitelio and perilymphatic administration of kainic acid. Brain Research
1999;826:95-103.
en monocapa de células planas, sustituiría al receptor. Sin
7. Bartolomé MV, Vago P, Gil-Loyzaga P, Humbert G, Joubert-Caron R,
embargo, persistirían algunas células y neuronas desestruc- Pujol R, Lenoir M. Sequential changes in anti-GAL-1 staining of the
turadas funcionantes. rat organ of Corti following amikacin exposure. Brain Research
Los primeros efectos de la presbiacusia son muy preco- 1999;822:43-51.
ces; por ello el tratamiento de la presbiacusia debe ser pre- 8. Gil-Loyzaga P (1999). Regeneración de los receptores del oído inter-
no. En: Libro del año. Otorrinolaringología 1999. Coordinación: Suá-
coz (prótesis, implantes, reeducación auditiva), antes de la
rez Nieto C. Ed: Saned. 181-196.
instauración de la degeneración retrógrada e irreversible de 9. Mikaelian DO, Warfield D, Norris O. Genetic progressive hearing
la vía auditiva. loss in the C57BL/6 mouse. Acta Otolaryngol 1974;77:327-334.
10. Gourevitch G. Auditory masking in the rat. J of the Acoustical So-
Referencias ciety of America 1965;37:439-443.
1. Schuknecht HF, Gacek MR. Cochlear pathology in Presbycusis. Ann 11. Henry KR, Chole RA. Genotypic differences in behavioral, physio-
Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:1-16. logycal and anatomical expressions of age-related hearing loss in
2. Willott JF, Chisolm TH, Lister JJ. Modulation of Presbycusis: Cu- the laboratory mouse. Audiology 1980;19:369-383.
rrent status and future directions. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:231-249. 12. Henry KR, Lepkowsky CM. Evoked potential correlates of genetic
3. Ciges M, Fernández F, Cortés R. Presbiacusia. En: Tratado de Oto- progressive hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 1978;86:366-374.
rrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. Ed. Proyectos Mé- 13. Willott JF, Jackson LM, Hunter KP. Morphometric study of the ante-
dicos. S.L. Guadalajara. Tomo II. Parte III; 1999;100:1395-1405. roventral cochlear nucleus of two mouse models of presbycusis. J
4. Gil-Carcedo LM. Anatomía del oído. En: Otología. Ed Menarini Comp. Neurol 1987;260:472-480.
Area Científica. 1995. 14. Mikaelian DO. (1979). Development and degeneration of hearing in
5. Schuknecht HF. Disorders of aging. En: Pathology of the ear. Schuk- the C57BL/6 mouse: relation of electrophysiologic responses from
necht HF. Lea y Febiger (Ed). Malvern. USA. 1993;Cap. 12.B: 416- the round window and cochlear nucleus to cochlear anatomy and
436. behavioral responses. The Laryngoscope 1979;89:1-15.
6. Gil-Loyzaga P, Hernández E, Carricondo FJ, Simón F, Poch-Broto J.
387