Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Vcg-Inmedbio Final Deliverable
Vcg-Inmedbio Final Deliverable
0
Contents
1 Market Sizing 4
1.1 Background 4
1.2 Chennai and Bangalore 4
1.2.1 Key References 4
1.2.2 Estimated Ranges 5
1.2 Tamil Nadu & India 5
1.2.1 Key References 5
1.2.2 Implications 5
1.2.3 Recommendations 6
1.3 Affordability 6
1.3.1 Overview 6
1.3.2 Methodology 6
1.3.2 Relevant Data 6
1.3.4 Cost Burden as Percentage of Income 7
1.3.5 Conclusion 7
1.4 Willingness to Pay 7
2. Ways to Sell Phoenix-Aid in India 8
2.1 Overview 8
2.2 General Process 8
2.3 Contacting Chain Pharmacies 8
2.3.1 Apollo 8
2.3.2 MedPlus 8
2.3.3 Sample Website to Find an Agent 8
2.4 E-Commerce 9
2.4.1 Business to Consumer 9
2.4.2 Business to Business 9
3. Diabetic Spending Patterns 10
3.1 Key Studies 10
4. Diabetic Specialty Centers 11
4.1 MV Hospital for Diabetes 11
4.2 ARH 11
1
4.3 Apollo Sugar Clinics 11
4.4 Conclusions & Implications 11
5. Remissions and Recurrence 12
5.1 Key Studies 12
6. Policies & Overview of the Pharmaceutical Market 13
6.1 Classification 13
6.2 Approval of Manufacturing & Selling 13
6.3 Patent Information 13
6.4 Trade Names for Foreign Companies 13
6.5 Distribution of Pharmacies & Products 13
6.6 Distance Selling 14
6.7 Pricing & Pricing Build-up 14
6.8 Restrictions of Imported Drugs 14
6.9 Likelihood of Receiving Recommendations from Doctors 14
6.10 Link to Hospitals and Pharmacies 15
7. Hospitals and Pharmacies 16
7.1 Overview 16
7.2 List of Hospitals 16
7.3 Another Look into Leading Diabetes Treatment Facilities 16
7.4 More on Spending Patterns 16
7.5 Some Implications 17
7.6 Number of Pharmacies in Chennai & Bangalore 17
7.7 Relevant Revenue 17
7.8 Some Implications 17
8. Policies & Pharmaceutical Landscape Deep-Dive 19
8.1 India Pharmaceutical Policies 2017 19
8.2 CDSCO 20
8.2.1 Overview 20
8.2.2 Key Updates 20
8.3 OPPI 51st Annual Report 2016-2017 20
8.3.1 The Pharmaceutical Landscape 20
8.3.2 Challenges 21
2
8.3.2 Policies 21
8.4 India Pharma 2020 by McKinsey 22
3
1 Market Sizing
1.1 Background
Although foot ulcer is a relatively common occurrence accompanying diabetes, there
appears to be no data bank citing accurate numbers on it. However, such numbers can be
logically estimated from relevant data that are publicly available. To dive deeper into the
size of this market, we have further broken it down into three sub-segments, the total
population of patients, the total population of patients who can afford the product and the
total population of patients who will be willing to pay for the product.
1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11848329
2
http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/chennai/chen-health/one-in-four-in-chennai-has-diabetes-study-reveals/article6584289.ece
3
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920109/
4
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/Why-is-Bangalore-the-Diabetes-Capital/article15340335.ece
5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4535103/
6
http://www.indushealthplus.com/karnataka-health-statistics.html
4
1.2.2 Estimated Ranges
Chennai: 12,500 - 64,000 Diabetics with foot ulcers
Bangalore: 67,800 - 101,800 Diabetics with foot ulcers
1.2.2 Implications
market for treatment concerning diabetic foot issues in Tamil Nadu, and India as a
whole, is not very mature. It is saturated with products, all of which attempt to
remedy the issue, at varying price points. That being said, many of them are still too
high for people to afford. InMedBio could potentially be able to obtain a sizeable
portion of market share, based on two factors. For market entry price, tentatively
recommend an expansive approach, taking into consideration the range of prices
and innovativeness of the product. For revenue projection, manufacturing and
distribution needs to be figured out (Request flow chart). Tentatively recommend
conducting a study in South India to determine Cost of Customer Acquisition.
7
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920109/
8
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vijay_Viswanathan2/publication/7881632_Amputation_Prevention_Initiative_in_South_India_Positive_impact_of_fo
ot_care_education/links/54bf85f60cf28ce68e6b5cdc.pdf
9
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vijay_Viswanathan2/publication/12053730_Cost_Burden_to_Diabetic_Patients_with_Foot_Complications_-
_A_Study_from_Southern_India/links/54f55bc10cf2eed5d7373719.pdf
5
1.2.3 Recommendations
• Prospective cohort study for further biomedical research for Phoenix Aid in India
using a stratified random sample
o Following certain groups of individuals could help to provide better insight
into how the product could be improved technically and in terms of
marketing
• Surveying patients with diabetic foot issues in Tamil Nadu using a simple random
sample and the Gabor-Granger pricing technique to determine an exact market
entry price for InMedBio
o Directly asking consumers about prices lends credibility to pricing choices
and asking patients will help as well
• Tentatively recommend a cross sectional study of rural and urban hospitals in Tamil
Nadu and South India to determine the cost to acquire customers
o The current market in South India favors products that have favorable
margins and pricing, and obtaining a snapshot of the current state of the
market would be beneficial to market entry later
o Revenue increases as cost of customer acquisition (and cost of value
delivered) goes down
1.3 Affordability
1.3.1 Overview
In a research paper published in the Journal of the Association of Physicians of India in
December 2000, diabetic patients without foot problems typically spend 9.3% of their
income on medication and treatments. However, diabetic patients with foot problems
typically spend 32.3% of their income on medication and treatments. This shows that the
financial burden on patients drastically increases if the patient is suffering from foot
infections. Although the research is rather old, based on the price of some of Phoenix-Aid’s
competitors, we do believe the numbers given in the research are relevant and acceptably
accurate.
1.3.2 Methodology
We seek to determine the cost of using Phoenix-Aid as a percentage of the patients’ income.
If the cost renders no significant additional financial burden to the patients, we would
conclude that the patients are able to afford Phoenix-Aid. We assume a typical patient
suffering from foot ulcers use Phoenix-Aid for 5 months in a year.
6
1.3.4 Cost Burden as Percentage of Income
• Chennai = 53.89 / 1870 = 2.88%
• Bangalore = 53.89 / 1420 = 3.80%
• Tamil Nadu = 53.89 / 1627 = 3.31%
• India = 53.59 / 1573 = 3.43%
1.3.5 Conclusion
Assuming patients already spend 10% of their income on treatments for diabetes, we can
see that using Phoenix-Aid to treat foot ulcers posts no significant additional burdens on
them, especially compared to some other treatments that can cost 20% of their income. As a
result, theoretically, almost all diabetic foot ulcer patients should be able to afford Phoenix-
Aid.
7
2. Ways to Sell Phoenix-Aid in India
2.1 Overview
To sell in India, there are three main methods of doing so; contacting a distribution
company who will put your product in stores, contacting stores directly, and listing
products on eCommerce websites. Our recommendation would be to list the product on
multiple eCommerce websites because they have great amounts of exposure and are mostly
free. It will help to better understand market demand, pricing, and logistics. Next, because of
inexperience in the Indian market, we would recommend contacting a stockist who would
be able to get your products into a wide range of stores across all of India, usually on a
commission basis. Once there is a point of entry and the market is well understood, we
would then recommend contacting retailers directly.
2.3.2 MedPlus
Just call 040 - 6700 6700
Email Id: wecare (at) medplusmart (dot) com
Customer service available: 8 AM - 10 PM daily
8
2.4 E-Commerce
India is expected to become the world’s fastest growing e-commerce market, driven by
robust investment in the sector and rapid increase in the number of internet users. Indian
ecommerce sales are expected to reach $120 billion by 2020 from $30 billion in 2016.
9
3. Diabetic Spending Patterns
3.1 Key Studies
1. Study One10
• On average, patients spend 3.6% of monthly income on direct treatment costs, 1.4%
on indirect costs
• Direct costs: 52% on medicines, 12.6% on surgeries, 11.6% on investigations, 10.4%
on clinician fees. Indirect costs: Almost entirely attributed to lost wages and
productivity
• Actual costs of treatment were relatively stable across income groups, but poorer
income groups spend much higher percentages of income on treatment
• Very few people in India have health insurance, so most expenditures are out-of-
pocket
2. Study Two11
• Most studies are concerned with direct costs, avoiding consideration of
healthcare systems (17 vs 2 studies)
o General absence of studies providing reliable diabetes data nationally
• It would take over 2.2 billion dollars to treat everyone in India with Type 2
diabetes
• Data from 19 economic studies in India found here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279984/table/Tab5/
o Data varies from region to region, but without a healthcare system in
place the costs for diabetes treatment including drugs, monitoring,
hospitalization, checkups, consulting, etc. easily reaches into the
hundreds. For patients in a healthcare system, it doesn’t even amount to
half a hundred USD
• Most of the direct costs for patients comes from the price of drugs
• Current studies are flawed - don’t give precise definition of disease, don’t specify
timeframe, too small sample or don’t specify sample size
3. Study Three12
• Good data concerning percentages of patients who experience various other
complications
• Ways to reduce costs of treatment: early screening, monitoring of risk factors,
increasing access to drugs, tight metabolic control
4. Study Four13
• Average cost of treatment is around $84
o Urban areas: 10,000 rupees for total treatment
o Rural areas: 6,250 rupees for total treatment
• Doesn’t include information about spending in terms of treating the associated
complications of diabetes
10
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4319201/
11
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279984/
12
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214999616000035
13
https://www.gobyme.com/cost-of-diabetes-in-india-age-gender-spend-of-patients-statistics/
10
4. Diabetic Specialty Centers
4.1 MV Hospital for Diabetes
• MV Hospital for Diabetes, specialty center for diabetes treatment in Chennai, founded by
the leading diabetes researcher in India
• 100 beds, 3 million total patients treated
• Offers “Doppler and Biothesiometry studies” for the early diagnosis of diabetic foot
complications
o Imaging of the blood vessels and vibrations to test for circulation and sensation
• Offers hyperbaric oxygen therapy to speed healing of chronic wounds by exposing them
to 100% oxygen
• Facilities include a Preventive Diabetes Foot Care department, with wound care
specialists and in-house production of diabetic footwear
o They appear to make and distribute their own products - footwear and “pharmacy
products” including wound care kits and bandages
4.2 ARH
• Diabetes specialty hospital chain with four locations in Southern India, also
• Foot care division “primarily focuses on prevention of minor and major amputations”
• Screen patients for risk of foot complications and offer custom-made indoor and
outdoor footwear, as well as compression socks and stockings
11
5. Remissions and Recurrence
5.1 Key Studies
1. Study One14
• By reviewing 19 compatible studies on incidence rates for ulcer recurrence, they estimate
that roughly 40% of patients have a recurrence within 1 year after ulcer healing, almost
60% within 3 years, and 65% within 5 years.
• It may be more useful to think of patients who have achieved wound closure as being in
remission rather than being healed.
• The number of patients in remission is, by definition, far greater than the number of
patients who have active diabetes-related foot complications.
• The reasons that ulcer recurrence rates are so high appear to be biologic or behavioral or
both.
2. Study Two15
• Of the initially presenting ulcers, 71.6% healed, 12.3% were not healed at the end of the
follow-up period, and 16.0% had led to a lower-extremity amputation. The median
duration of follow-up was 31.5 months ([mean ± SD] 27.1 ± 9.2).
• Of the total population, 60.5% of the patients developed an ulcer in the follow-up period.
The incidence of ulceration was 26.8 per 100 patients per year.
• If multiple ulcers were counted as separate events, the incidence rose to 56.3 per 100 per
year
14
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1615439
15 http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/30/8/2077
12
6. Policies & Overview of the Pharmaceutical Market
6.1 Classification
The main policies governing the import, manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs and
cosmetics are Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945. It is
crucial to determine which category of drugs Phoenix-Aid falls into because of the
implications on selling and pricing. The following are common categories:
• Schedule H and X: prescription-only
• Schedule G: prescription not needed but mandatory warning text on the label
• Schedule K: mostly household remedies, non-pharmacists can sell in villages with fewer
than 1,000 subjects
• Ayurvedic Medicines: contain plant-based natural active ingredients, drug sale license
not required
13
However, as of 2006, less than 5% of the Fast-moving Consumer Goods sales go through
organized retailors. An elementary search on the online inventories of Apollo Pharmacy and
AIOCD shows no direct competitor to Phoenix-Aid but traditional bandages and ointment.
To avoid the 2% Central Sales Tax for interstate sales, manufacturers or contracted
independent Clearing and Forwarding (C&F) agents typically operate a warehouse or
stockist in each state and further distribute within each state. The pharmaceutical products
typically go from manufactures to C&F agents and then to warehouses or stockists and
finally to whole sellers or retailers. This chain of distribution plays a major role in pricing,
as we will see later in this report.
14
• Only 7% of doctors found it against their medical ethics to give advice on advertised
brands
15
7. Hospitals and Pharmacies
7.1 Overview
The market of drugstores is largely dominated by small independent shops, which will
present challenging issues in accessibility. Therefore, it may be wise to focus a little more on
hospitals than pharmacies at the early stages. Furthermore, researches have shown that
prevalence of diabetes in rural population is 25% that of in urban population, thus it may be
a good idea to start with hospitals in the urban regions. We can further break down
hospitals into three general categories, which are public hospitals, private hospitals and
specialized diabetes treatment facilities. There are data on the numbers and locations of
these hospitals are readily available, especially in the urban regions, either through
compiled lists or simply through Google Map searches. Generally, there are much more
private hospitals as compared to public hospitals.
16
http://healthmarketinnovations.org/sites/default/files/Case_study_on_DMDSC.pdf
16
• Very few people in India have health insurance, so most expenditures are out-of-pocket
17
• Apollo Pharmacy – 1,500 countrywide (in Bangalore & Chennai)
• MedPlus – 1,400+ countrywide (in Bangalore & Chennai)
• Hetero – 285 countrywide
• Guardian – 200 countrywide (in Bangalore & Chennai)
MedPlus serves 250,000 customers per day or 179 people per store per day 14
Extrapolating this to the number of pharmacies gives us:
179*4060= 725,000 potential customers per day in Bangalore
179*5110= 912,500 potential customers per day in Channai
18
8. Policies & Pharmaceutical Landscape Deep-Dive
8.1 India Pharmaceutical Policies 2017171819
Introduced in August 2017, the Draft Pharmaceutical Policies implements drastic changes to
the current landscape under two overarching themes – “ease of doing business” and “end-
to-end manufacturing” in India. Although the first theme would shorten the timeline for
Phoenix-Aid to be approved and licensed for manufacturing and selling, the second theme
would in many ways significantly hinder Phoenix-Aid’s cost advantages since InMedBio is a
U.S. based company and many key starting materials (KSM) and active pharmaceutical
ingredients (API) would be shipped to India from U.S. Phoenix-Aid can potentially be
impacted in the following ways:
• Formulations produced from indigenously produced API and its intermediates will be given
preference in government procurements
• The aforementioned formulations will be taken out of price control for five years and the
price control be linked to the indigenous content of the formulations
• To encourage R&D, the Government of India would allow a concessional rate of customs duty
of 0 to 5 percent on import of specified goods and services required for R&D in the
pharmaceutical industry
• Currently per the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and Rules, the registration fee for overseas
manufacturing sites is $1,500 per facility and $1,000 per drug/strength. Inspection/audit of
the facility, if necessary, carries an additional $5,000 fee. The policy intends to amend the fee
structure and states the fee structure would match international standards being followed by
larger pharmaceutical-producing countries, meaning the fees are likely to increase
significantly in the near future.
• The draft policy proposes to shorten the approval process to three months and to standardize
the process.
• Drugs should be prescribed per generic and not brand names, exemptions being fixed-dose
combinations and patented drugs, giving brand names to generic drugs hampers innovation
and should be discouraged.
• Per the policy, the Drugs (Prices Control) Order (DPCO), which is implemented by the NPPA,
will be modified on many counts. The Schedule I of the DPCO shall contain only the medicine’s
name in the NLEM, without referring to its strength and dosage forms. The DPCO will include
only off-patent medicines. In-patent medicines will not be subjected to price ceilings by the
NPPA, a move welcomed by foreign multinational drug firms. Prices for patented drugs would
be regulated through a compulsory license mechanism, provided under the WTO TRIPS
Agreement and Patents Act of India.
17
http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/draft%20pharmaceutical%20policy%202017.pdf
18
https://www.biosimilardevelopment.com/doc/india-s-draft-pharmaceutical-policy-a-game-changer-0001
19
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/draft-pharmaceutical-policy-2017-ganesh-prasad-mishra/
19
8.2 CDSCO
8.2.1 Overview
Central Drugs Standard Control Organization has the following responsibilities:
• National regulatory body of India for pharmaceuticals and medical devices
• Approves new drugs and clinical trials
• Import registration and licensing
• License approving for medical devices
• Oversight and market surveillance above state authority
• Amends Drug and Cosmetics Act and changes rules
20
http://www.nishithdesai.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/NDA%20Hotline/Analysis_of_Medical_Devices_Rules-2017.pdf
21
http://www.cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/Guidelines%20on%20Grouping%20of%20Medical%20Device%20and%20IVD_1.pdf
22
http://www.cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/FAQ%20on%20Grouping%20Guidelines.pdf
23
http://www.cdsco.nic.in/writereaddata/Upda%20FAQ%20MDR_2017.pdf
20
that the new patient pool is well-informed about treatments they undergo and
medicines they are prescribed, a majority of payers are looking forward to inking
different healthcare plans with an outcome/value-based pricing model, especially for
high-priced and specialty drugs — oncology care drugs, hepatitis C treatment, etc.
Enhancing the patient experience via better efficacy of drugs is expected to drive value
based pricing instead of volume-based pricing.” (10)
The incidence of diabetes is expected to rise in Indian in the coming years and so is the
usage of value rather than volume-based treatments. There will be a greater demand for
higher quality bandages from the current market segment and the market segment as a
whole is expected to increase.
8.3.2 Challenges
• “Increase in regulatory scrutiny by the FDA” (11)
• “There are multiple regulatory bodies, which directly, or indirectly, frame rules and
guidelines for the pharmaceutical sector; this duplicity has caused inefficiencies and
delays in the drug approval process.” (11)
• Suboptimal alignment between the state and central governments: When a
biopharmaceutical company needs to take a new drug approval from the central
government, the manufacturing, and sales and distribution licenses are issued by the
state government. (11)
Expected challenges include stricter regulation, red tape in the Indian bureaucracy, and
multiple levels of government needed for licensing.
8.3.2 Policies
• “The central government is planning to introduce a new pharma pricing policy. The new
policy is expected to replace the existing National Pharmaceutical Pricing Policy, 2012,
which forms the core of the Drugs Price Control Order, 2013.” (11)
• “The government is working towards drafting a new Drugs and Cosmetics Act to
improve the ease of doing business (EoDB) for the pharmaceutical industry. The new
rules are expected to streamline the regulatory requirements related to safety,
efficacy and quality of drugs.” (11)
• “The government has notified Medical Devices Rules 2017 under the Drugs and
Cosmetics Act, 1940. These are expected to ease the regulation of medical devices. The
new rules are expected to come into effect from 1 January 2018.” (11)
• “The government is working with stakeholders towards drafting a new clinical trials
policy to facilitate faster approvals without compromising on patient safety.” (12)
• “The Goods and Services Tax (GST) has been implemented from 1 July 2017, and is
expected to eliminate the cascading effect of taxes and other anomalies of the current
indirect tax structure. With the advent of the GST, the supply chain of the pharmaceutical
industry could get impacted with the availability of input tax credit of interstate trade
GST (IGST) on inter-state transactions, eliminating the need for Carrying and Forwarding
Agents (CFAs) in each state. Thus, it is expected to bring efficiencies in the supply chain.”
(12)
Future policies are expected to facilitate clinical trials, reduce regulation, reduce taxes, and
make pharmaceutical prices more transparent.
21
8.4 India Pharma 2020 by McKinsey
• India’s pharma market is very much still developing - will become one of the leading
sources of growth in the coming years
• As a new market, there’s still lots of shuffling among the top companies, lots of space for
newcomers to grow
• By 2020, market in India will be comparable to that of China or even the U.S.
o Like the U.S. market, India currently produces a huge volume of healthcare at lower
quality than the developed world on average
• Hospitals will nearly double their market share by 2020, from 13% to 25%
• Market will shift toward more specialized therapies and specialty practices
• Expected case shows 14.5% growth by 2020, with optimistic projections up to 17%
• Expect income growth and expansion of insurance coverage, making drugs more affordable
o Private insurance coverage expected to expand by 15% annually through 2020
o Gov’t programs targeted at citizens below the poverty line will expand insurance
coverage to many previously too poor to afford it
• Access to drugs and care in rural areas will expand rapidly, closing gap between urban and
rural spending in the industry
• Lots of potential for patented products in “select therapeutic areas” - cite Januvia and
Galvus, two diabetes drugs, as exemplary cases
22