Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Tema 4
1.
RIESGO SISMICO
2.
SISMOLOGIA
3.
EFECTOS SISMICOS
4.
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
5.
6.
7.
CONCEPTOS DE DISEO
8.
COVENIN 1756
INDICE
RIESGO SISMICO
RIESGO SISMICO
RIESGO SISMICO
RIESGO SISMICO
SISMOLOGIA
INTRODUCCION
-EN LOS ULTIMOS 3 SIGLOS MAS DE 3 MILLONES HAN MUERTO A CAUSA DE SISMOS O
DESASTRES CAUSADOS POR SISMOS
-70% DE LA TIERRA SE CONSIDERA SISMICAMENTE ACTIVA. 1,000,000,000 PERSONAS
VIVEN EN ZONAS CON RIESGO SISMICO
-LOS SISMOS PUEDEN CAUSAR PERDIDAS HUMANAS Y PERDIDAS MATERIALES
IMPORTANTES.
-LOS SISMOS NO PUEDEN PREVENIRSE NI PREDECIR CON PRECISION.
-NO SON LOS MOVIMIENTOS SISMICOS DIRECTAMENTE LOS QUE CAUSAN PERDIDAS,
SINO EL COLAPSO O DANO DE ESTRUCTURAS NO RESISTENTES.
SISMOLOGIA
INGENIERIA SISMICA
-COOPERACION DE DIFERENTES DISCIPLINAS
DE LAS CIENCIAS E INGENIERIAS PARA
CONTROLAR LOS RIESGOS SOCIOECONOMICOS DE LOS SISMOS
-TRATA DE RESPONDER:
SISMOLOGIA
LA TIERRA
TECTONIC PLATES
Seismology
SISMOLOGIA
GLO
14/03/2
LA TIERRA
TECTONIC PLATES
TECTONIC PLATES
Earthquake e
Depth of foc
15
14
16
10
TECTONIC PLATES
SISMOLOGIA
Stresses build
up in the crust,
usually due to
lithospheric plate
motions
ONDAS SISMICAS
TECTONIC PLATES
Rock deform
(strain) as the
result of stress.
The strain is
energy stored in
the rocks.
AND asEARTHQUAKE
oblique-slip faults.
21
22
11
11
Maria
one starts
14/03/2012
foot wall
ntsSISMOLOGIA
we live on
of the action
ONDAS SISMICAShanging wall
Plates may
FAULT AND EARTHQUAKE
each other.
Normal fault
NORMAL
We classify faults by how the two rocky blocks on FALLA
either side
of a fault
d by moving
move relative to each other. The one you see here is a normal fault. A
cky crust until it EARTHQUAKES
normal fault drops rock on one side of the fault down relative to the other
side. Take a look at the side that shows the fault and arrows indicating
at once,
Earthquake focus: center of rupture or slip, seismic waves radiate out
from the focus movement. the block farthest to the right that looks kind of like a foot is
e two rocky
Earthquake epicenter
the point
on theThe
Earthsblock
surface on
overthe
the focus
the foot
wall.
other side of the fault
is resting
FAULT
ANDorEARTHQUAKE
ns along a more
hanging on top of the foot wall block and is named hanging wall.
If we hold
want
to pull the
Reverse
faultthe foot wall stationary, gravity will normally
lled a fault.
FALLA
REVERSA
fault
hanging
wall see
down.
movefault.
the way
you awould
expect
The
fault you
here
is a that
reverse
Along
reverse
faultgravity
one to
hypocenter
is
Faults
s
an
earthquake
ault. A
move
themisnormally
called normal
rocky
block
pushed are
up relative
to rockfaults!
on the other side.
another
name
Where
the fault
has
ruptured fault
the Earth
that
movement
alongatthe
nergy
he otherfrom the
Heres
a way
to tell
a reverse
fromsurface,
a normal
fault.
Take a look
for
the
focus
fault
has
produced
an
elongate
fault
generated
cliff
called
fault
scarp.
cating
mic waves in all
the side that shows the fault and arrows indicating movement. The
foot is
Maria
Gabriella
Mulasfoot wall. The block on the other
block farthest to the right
that
is the
27
arthquake is the
r
side of the fault is the hanging wall.
FALLA STRIKE-SLIP
ach
the
surface
l.
Strike-slip fault
32
If we hold the foot wall stationary, where
would the hanging wall go if
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
Strike-slip
faults
have a different type
we reversed gravity? The hanging wall will slide
upwards.
When
Maria Gabriella Mulas
12
ull the
31
1. ONDAS P: 8 KM/S
SISMOLOGIA
2. ONDAS S: 5 KM/S, NO SE
MUEVEN EN LIQUIDOS
SEISMIC
WAVES
3. ONDAS
SUPERFICIALES:
LAS MAS LENTAS,
SOLO
SE
WAVES
SEISMIC
TRANSMITEN EN LA SUPERFICIE. LAS MAS DESTRUCTIVAS
ONDAS SISMICAS
P- w aves most
rapid (8 km/sec)
ON OF SEISMIC
AVES
S- w aves slower
(5 km/sec),
cannot move
through liquids
Surface w aves
even slower, move
only on surface,
most destructive
Mulas
39
Maria Gabriella Mulas
41
r
Surface Waves seismic w
surface, most destructive sei
Surface waves travel along t
ground and anything resting
Body P w aves push-pull
and pull (expand) rocks in th
Body S w aves shake the
direction of travel
Gases and liquids do not tran
P waves
A seismogram shows all thre
arrive first, then the S waves
last
The waves arrive at different
different speeds
40
13
SEISMIC WAVES
Maria Gabriella Mu
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
SISMOLOGIA
03 - Fundamentals of Engineering
VelocitySeismology
equations
BODY WAVES
k 4 / 3 BODY WAVES
V
VP
ONDAS SISMICAS
density
Velocity equation
k 4/ 3
(rigidity)
shear modulus
(km/ s)
43
Material
44
43
200 400
400 800
500 - 1000
700 1500
2500 - 3500
14
SISMOLOGIA
SURFACE WAVES
ONDAS SISMICAS
SURFACE WAVES
Rayleigh waves
Rayleigh waves
Love waves
waves
Love waves travel faster than Rayleigh waves and thereforeLove
arrive earlier
Maria Gabriella Mulas
45
46
Love waves travel faster than Rayleigh waves and therefore arrive earlier
45
46
15
a Mulas
SURFACE WAVES
SISMOLOGIA
02 - Seismology DE ONDAS SISMICAS
MEDICION
14/03/201
SISMOGRAM
SISMOGRAM
SISMOGRAM
Tells you:
SISMOGRAMAS
Distance
- Time Relations
based on the time difference
occurred,
1) How far away the earthquake
We can determine the distance to an epicenter by finding
ves with the ground
between p and s wave arrivals
the difference between the arrival of P waves and S waves.
and weight
tationary, because of the spring,
Looking athinge
a travel-time
graph we can determine how
Magnitude of ground motion, based on the amplitude of the S waves
2) far
away the epicenter is
49
Travel-time graphs from three or more seismographs can be
used to find the exact location of an earthquake epicenter
49
50
Tells you:
1) How far away the earthquake occurred, based on the time difference
between p and s wave arrivals
2) Magnitude of ground motion, based on the amplitude of the S waves
Seismometers:
The paper roll moves with the ground
SISMOGRAFOS
The pen remains stationary, because of the spring, hinge and weight
Maria Gabriella Mulas
53
50
54
16
- Seismology
14/03
SISMOLOGIA
MEDICION DE SISMOS
RITCHER SCALE
MOMENTO DE MAGNITUD
MEASUREMENTS OF EARTHQUAKES
MEASUREMENTS OF EARTHQUAKES
ENERGIA
SISMICA
MEASUREMENTS
OF EARTHQUAKES
69
69
70
70
17
MEASUREMENTS OF EARTHQUAKES
SISMOLOGIA
MEDICION DE SISMOS
termed
ve recorded
ed accelerograms)
omplete information
ocation
otion at the site)
quency content,
Indonesia (12/04)
Pakistan
(10/05)
75
18
acceleration is
, PGA
76
SISMOLOGIA
PROPAGACION
DE ONDAS
SEISMIC RISK: determination
of ground motions
having the required probability of exceedance
83
19
SISMOLOGIA
20
21
EFECTOS SISMICOS
LICUEFACCION
13
13
14
14
The weight
of the building squeezes the adjacent soil
1964 Nilgata, Japan
13
http://nisee.berkeley.edu/bertero/html/damage_due_to_liquefaction.html
ji-ji_chap8.pdf pag. 7-10 (figs. 8.6-8.18)
12
15
15
Proyecto
Estructural
- Prof. Michele Casarin
Maria Gabriella
Mulas
16
22
16
EFECTOS SISMICOS
hquake Damage
- Part I - 1
Landslides
Landslides - 2
DESLIZAMIENTOS
Landslides
- 1 inclined mass of soil is suddenly shaken, a
When
a steeply
slip lane can form and the material slides downhill.
Landslides - 2
Before
Before
After
Landslides - 3
17
After
18
17
Landslide of Turnagain Heights
Anchorage, Alaska 1964
23
17
EFECTOS SISMICOS
DESLIZAMIENTOS
slides - 3
Landslide of Turnagain
Anchorage, Alaska 1964
20
24
19
EFECTOS SISMICOS
Ground rupture - 1
Ground rupture - 3
Ground motio
Guatem
Rails be
Maria Gabriella Mulas
23
25
mage - Part I
EFECTOS SISMICOS
ARCILLAS DEBILES
Piles punctured
the bridge
Shear damage was
found at the top of
the piles
Piles were
dragged by
the soil
29
29
Piles punctured
the bridge
Shear damage was
found at the top of
the piles
30
26
35
27
The soft silts and clays were extremely sensitive to the long period (about
2s) ground motion
coming from the distant but high-magnitude source. Many
EFECTOS
SISMICOS
medium height
buildings (10-14 stories) were damaged or collapsed during
ARCILLAS
DEBILES
the earthquake.
Tsunami
Tsun
EFECTOS SISMICOS
Earthquake
Damage - Part I
TSUNAMI
Tsunami
37
37
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
28
EFECTOS SISMICOS
29
TSUNAMI
Ground motion
Foundatio
Foundation failure - 1
EFECTOS
SISMICOS
Foundation failure - 2
Ove
foun
Foundation connection
11
Timber structure
Other
will fa
30
Hous
We have seen pile damage due to weak
ancho
Slough bridge (1989 Loma Prieta). found
down
As long as the foundation is embedded
in
stud w
usually has ample strength
and ductility
boltst
When
the foun
sill pla
earthquakes.
become unsta
Foundation connection
Foundation c
EFECTOS SISMICOS
FALLAS
EN of
CONEXIONES
CON
LAS FUNDACIONES
The
major cause
damage to electrical
transformers,
storage bins,
ction
Foundation
connection (special structures)
and a variety of other structures is the lack of secure connection to
the foundation
17
Maria Gabriella Mulas
17
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
18
31
Pull-out of column
reinforcement from the
foundation
The longitudinal rebars
did not have sufficient
development length to
transfer the force to the
footings
Insufficient confinement
reinforcements in the
footings and columns
Pull-out of column
reinforcement from the
foundation
The longitudinal rebars
did not have sufficient
development length to
transfer the force to the
footings
Insufficient confinement
reinforcements in the
footings and columns
EFECTOS SISMICOS
Soft story
32
t story
Soft story
FALLAS POR ENTREPISO DEBIL SOFT
STORY
EFECTOS SISMICOS
Soft Story, LAquila 2009
21
33
So
25
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
34
Durin
at th
redu
Most
and
disco
35
10-story SRC
building with 3rd
floor collapse
M
Ko
Maria
28
36
EFECTOS
SISMICOS
Soft story at mid level
Torsional moments
EFECTOS
SISMICOS
Torsional mom
Torsional moments
37
Torsional moments
EFECTOS
SISMICOS
32
38
39
unding
-2
EFECTOS
Pounding
- 2 SISMICOS
Shear
Most b
frames
MostDamag
building
frames
to res
comple
Damage
to t
Shear
complete
col
reinforc
Shear damag
reinforcemen
40
Maria Gabriella M
lure
MtMcKinley
McKinleyApartments
Apartments
re Mt
Shear failure Mt McKinley Apartments
ska
Earthquake,
1964
kaEFECTOS
Earthquake,
1964
SISMICOS
Great Alaska Earthquake, 1964
41
horizontal beam.
EFECTOS SISMICOS
Shear failure
CORTE
37
42
McKinley Apartments
FALLAS POR
quake, 1964
SISMICOS
earEFECTOS
failure (short column)
39
43
LA
EFECTOS SISMICOS
FALLAS POR CORTE
42
44
Flexural failureSISMICOS
of columns
EFECTOS
Flexural fa
ure of columns
Flexural failure
the concrete to
45
EFECTOS SISMICOS
umn
Column failure
Column failure
Maria Gabriella
47
Insufficient
transversal reinforcement results
in Mulas
lack of
confinement for columns
46
EFECTOS SISMICOS
49
49
47
Failure
of beam-column
node
FALLAS
EN NODOS
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
nt of Mechanics of Particles
MECANICA
13 - 45
-2nda LEY
DE NEWTON:
F= Mex A of Nwt
Alternate
expression
ma
on s second law,
ma inertial vector
Magnitude
of the force
a spring
With
the inclusion
of theexerted
inertialby
vector,
the is
system
-LEYES DE TRABAJO. RESORTES.
deflection,
ofproportional
forces actingtoon
the particle is equivalent to
zero. FThekx
particle is in dynamic equilibrium.
k developed
spring constant
N/m or in
lb/in.
Methods
for particles
static
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
equilibrium may be applied, e.g., coplanar forces
48
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
VIBRACIONES DE PARTICULAS
-SON MOVIMIENTOS DE UNA PARTICULA O CUERPO EN EL CUAL OSCILA CON RESPECTO A UN
PUNTO DE EQUILIBRIO.
-EL PERIODO DE VIBRACION (T=s) EL TIEMPO REQUERIDO PARA QUE UN SISTEMA COMPLETE UN
CICLO COMPLETO DE MOVIMIENTO
-LA FRECUENCIA (f=hertz=1/s) ES EL NUMERO DE CICLOS POR UNIDAD DE TIEMPO
-LA AMPLITUD ES EL DESPLAZAMIENTO MAXIMO DEL CUERPO DESDE EL PUNTO DE EQUILIBRIO
-SE CONSIDERA UNA VIBRACION LIBRE CUANDO EL MOVIMIENTO ES MANTENIDO POR LAS
FUERZAS INERCIALES. CUANDO UNA FUERZA HARMONICA ES APLICADA SE LE LLAMA VIBRACION
FORZADA.
49
monic Motion
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
VIBRACIONES
DE PARTICULAS
Free Vibrations
of Particles. Simple
If aDEparticle
is displaced through a dista
Motion
-SI UNA Harmonic
PARTICULA ES DESPLAZADA
SU PUNTO DE EQUILIBRIO Y SOLTADA SIN VELOCIDAD, LA
ma
mx kx 0
mx kx
k st
kx
50
General
solution
is the
oftwo
twoparticu
par
General
solution
is thesum
sum of
k
kk
x C1 sink
t C2 cos
t
x C1 sin
tm C2 cos m t
SIMPLE STRUCTURES - 3
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
SIMPLE STRUCTURES e- 1
STRUCTURES - 2
ESTRUCTURAS SIMPLE
SIMPLES
51
16
In an ideal case, the structure15
will oscillate
indefinitely,
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
Maria Gabriella Mulas, Paolo Martinelli
Paolo Martinelli
Maria Gabriella M
17
ESTRUCTURAS SIMPLES
v(t)
m
k
f(t)
c
Idealization of a 1
Hp. Bending
deformat
the roof level,
a ma
viscous damper th
24 EJ
of dynam
kTwo types
3
h force in t
external
ground motion im
mv cv kv
f (t )
52
Equation of motion
displacement
mass
stiffness
dynamic external
viscous damping c
18
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
ESTRUCTURAS 1 GRADO DE LIBERTAD
-IDEALIZACION DE UNA ESTRUCTURA DE UN PISO: LA MASA M ES CONCENTRADA EN EL TECHO,
SOBRE UN PORTICO SIN MASA PERO QUE TIENE RIGIDEZ, JUNTO UN AMORTIGUADOR VISCOSO
QUE DISIPA ENERGIA.
Single-degree-of-freedom system 1
1)
2)
53
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
25
ystems
-2
nelastic force-deformation relation: panel zone of
21
Damping force - 1
26
internal
restoring force
li
Newtons law
ized
one-story
frame
is subjected
to an
external
idealized
one-story
frame
is subjected
to an
external
in
the
direction
of
u
DINAMICA
DE
ESTRUCTURAS
ed
one-story
frame
is
subjected
mic
force
in the
direction
force
p(t) p(t)
in the
direction
of uof uto an external
1 GRADO
one-story
frame is subjected to an external
rceESTRUCTURAS
p(t) inThe
theidealized
direction
of DE
u LIBERTAD
dynamic force p(t) in the direction of u
tons
second
law
states
that:
second
law
states
that:
econd law
states
that:
2ndaNewtons
LEY
DE NEWTON:
second law states that:
aw
states
equation
can that:
be rewritten as:
ation
can
be
rewritten
on can be The
rewritten
as:as:
equation
can be rewritten as:
e elastic
range we
obtain:
be
rewritten
as:
stic
range
we
obtain:
In the
elastic range we obtain:
ELASTICO:
ic range we
obtain:
e inelastic range
:
INELASTICO:
In: the
lastic
range
: inelastic range :
stic
werange
obtain:
55
fI
mu
pt
fI
fD
fS
32
fI
Newtons law
DAlemberts
Principle
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
56
Newtons law
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
ut t
ut
33
fI
ug t
ug ground displacement
u relative
displacement
Equation
of motion:
earthquake
excitation
DAlemberts
Newtons law
t
u absolute displacement
Principle
fI
fD
33
fI
mu t
mu cu ku
mu g t
fS
mu cu
f s u ,u
fD
fI
mu t t
mu cu ku
mu g t
fS
mu cu
f s u ,u
ut
ug t
ug ground displacement
u relative displacement
ut absolute displacement
mu t
ug t
mu g t
mu t
ug t
34
mu g t
34
57
ut t
Principle
ntroduction
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
Maria Gabriella Mulas, Paolo Martinelli
41
-Se conoce la masa, rigidez y coeficiente de amortigumiento. Se conoce la excitacion externa ya sea en forma de una fuerza
dinamica P(t) o en forma de desplazamiento del suelo Ug(t). Las condiciones de inicio son U=0
Duhamels integral
-Se requiere la respuesta de la estructura, ya sea en forma de desplazamientos, velocidades, aceleraciones o fuerzas
internas.
-Luego que se calculo el desplazamiento de respuesta U(t) de la estructura, se calculan los esfuerzos internos para cada
In this approach
the external
force is represented
a los
instante de tiempo utilizando ANALISIS ESTATICOS:
1) Se le puede
aplicar la deformacion
a la estructura as
y hallar
esfuerzos internos. 2) Se le puede aplicar
la fuerza estatica
equivalente P, lashort
cual aplicada
en dado momento debe resultar en
sequence
of infinitesimally
impulses.
la misma derformacion U calculado anteriormente. 3) En sistemas inelasticos se deben hacer calculos paso a paso
The response of the system to an applied force p(t) at
incrementales.
58
ion-Para
ofresolver
motion
of a SDOF
system
subjected
toresponses
t, isgrado
obtained
addingdethe
all the la fuerza
la ecuacion diferencial de time
segundo
se utilizaby
la integral
Duhamel,
donde seto
representa
externa
como
una secuencia
de cortos differential
impulsos
infinitos.
impulses
up to that
time:
orce
is a
second
order
equation:
DINAMICA
ESTRUCTURAS
undamped frame
of a 1-story
Free vibrations DE
59
am x m
2
n
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
2
Damped
- 1s2
0.040 m 6.93Free
rad s Vibrations
am 1.920 m
briella Mulas
ns - 1
ma :
st
mx cx kx
cx
0
mx
c
cc
60
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
Structures
are usually
underdamped on period
Effect
of
damping
2
VIBRACION
LIBRE
DE ESTRUCTURAS
CON
AMORTIGUAMIENTO
Vibration
of SDOF
systems
El periodo
con namortiguamiento
Tdn es1
1
d
cc
mayoramplitude
que Tn.
18
xm
v0
n x0
2
Damped freenxvibrations
-7
0
damped perio
Effect
d D of damping on period
Td
c
cc
Tn
= xm
2
n
natural period
For d
typica
Maria Gabriella Mu
engin
the va
such
signif
the na
vibra
2
Misma
y rigidez
1 masa
natural period
Free vibration due to an initial displacement applied to four
61
Forced Vibrations:
harmonic excitation
DINAMICA
DE ESTRUCTURAS
Harmonic vibrations of undamped systems
tems
Vibracion forzada de un sistema ocurre cuando es sometida a fuerzas periodicas o desplazamientos periodicos
Forced vibrations - Occur
when a system is subjected to
a periodic force or a periodic
Vibration of SDOF systems
displacement of a support.
forced frequency
f
Particular solution
solution
mentary solution
sin t
0 nt
at t
p 01
k 1
/ n 2/
sinF2 tsinmat :
u u0
up t
p0
k 1
uc t
A cos nt B sin nt
1
/ n 2
P sine
steadystat
steadystat e m
mx kx
29
ft
Pm sin
29
st
mx
ut
A cos nt
st
m
ux
t ukx
0 cos knt
ft
sin t
u0
System
response
System
response
for for
/
Complementary solution
1
sin t
/0.2n
0.2
u0
u0 0
u0
u 0n p0 / k n p0 / k
2x
/ m
n
p0
t 1 2 sin nt p0
k f1Maria /Gabriella
k 1
Mulas
n
transient
Harmon
Particular solution
p0
sin
k 1f
m
m sin
p0
k
u0
B sin nt
Harmonic force
1
/ n 2
sin t
30
steadystat e
27
29
62
ticular solution
Harmonic force
30
DINAMICA DE ESTRUCTURAS
Damped
Forced
HarmonicDE
Vibrations
1
VIBRACION
FORZADA
ESTRUCTURAS
CON AMORTIGUAMIENTO
Damped Forced Harmonic Vibrations 2
Problem
statement
and ocurre
steady
state
response
Vibracion forzada
de un sistema
cuando
essolution
sometida
a fuerzas periodicas o desplazamientos periodicos
General
Damped Forced Harmonic Vibrations - 3
Steady state
0.2
0.05
u0
u0
cx kx
and steady
xm
Pm sin
ft
/k
xm
39
n p0
40
63
nification
ctor mx
ESPECTRO
DE RESPUESTA
Recorded Ground Motions (horizontal component)
ues recorded
many different
ations
3 components: 2 horizontal, 1
vertical
Strong-motion accelerographs
Frequency range of recording
without excessive distorsion:
Ground
presum
known
indepen
structur
RIGID
NO SO
STRUC
INTER
Time in
which n
values a
0.01-0.0
4
Maria Gabriella Mulas
64
ND
t
S ESPECTRO
DE
RESPUESTA
f
mu
f
cu
ku
I MOVIMIENTO Y PARAMETROS
D
s
ECUACION
DE RESPUESTA
uation
of motion forDE
earthquake
citation - 1
fI
fD
mu
fs 0
mut
fI
ug = ground displ.
cu ku 0
ut = u + ug
fD
cu
fs
ku
cu mu ku
cu ku 0 mu
f
f
fmu
0
g
mu cu ku
mu t
relative
displacement
u(t) of the
system
is the
same thattha
we w
ative displacement u(t)The
of
the
system
is
the
same
obtain by applying to the stationary base system the effective load
t
mu t
by applying to the stationary basepsystem
the effectiv
t
fI
fD
fs
fD
cu
mu t
fs
ku
cu ku 0
peff t
mu cu ku
mu g t
relative displacement u(t) of the system is the same that we would
in by applying to the stationary base system the effective load:
peff t
mug tMaria
mug t
Gabriella Mulas
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
65
f I 7 mut
ESPECTRO DE RESPUESTA
ECUACION
DE TMOVIMIENTO
PARAMETROS
DE RESPUESTA
Same , different
Same T , Y
different
-GRAFICAS:
DE RESPUESTA DE
Time required HISTORIA
to
DEFORMACION
complete a cycle DE SDOF PARA SISMO DE EL
CENTRO.
when subjected to
this earthquake
-DOS
SISTEMAS CON EL MISMO T Y
ground motion is
AMORTIGUAMIENTO, TENDRAN LA MISMA
close to the natural
RESPUESTA
period.
-PARAMETROS
The longer the DE RESPUESTA DE INTERES:
period, the greater
DEFORMACIONES
RELATIVAS (PARA CALCULO
the
peak
DE ESFUERZOS INTERNOS), DEFORMACIONES
deformationACELERACION TOTAL.
TOTALES,
systems
2
n
ug t
u( t ) u t ,Tn ,
10
Same , different Tn
Same Tn , different
66
Time require
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
complete a c
by
fs
fs
At
2
n
ut
fs(t)
mA t
2
n
Static
structure
static eq
ut
2
Vb(t)
2
n
2
Tn
Mb(t)
Vb
Mb t
fs t
mA t
hf s t
hVb t
67
as
ku t
of Application
pseudo-acceleration
concept
of pseudo-acceleration
concept
ESPECTRO DE RESPUESTA
fs(t)
fs(t)
Vb
Mb t
Mb(t)
fs t
mAVbt
fs t
b t t hf s t
hf s t MhV
b
mA t
hVb t
68
Vb(t)
Mb(t)
u0 Tn ,
max u t , Tn ,
Deformation R. S
u0 Tn ,
max u t , Tn ,
Relative velocity
u0 Tn ,
max u t , Tn ,
Acceleration R.S
69
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
CONCEPT
Pseudo-velocity:
ESPECTRO
DEresponse
RESPUESTA
Pseudo
acceleration
spectrum, linear scale
CONCEPTO2DE
ESPECTRO
DE RESPUESTA
Deformation
response
spectrum,
log scale
V
D
D V u
ku02
Es0
kD
2
Tn
kV
mV
2
Pseudo-acceleration:
A
Vb 0
2
n
f s0
2
Tn
D
mA
PASOS
Linear scale
-DEFINIR ACELERACION DEL SUELO EN FUNCION DEL
From this plot:
TIEMPO
-SELECCIONAR
Y AMORTIGUAMIENTO
Base shear Tcoefficient
-CALCULO
DESPLAZAMIENTOS Y DESPLAZAMIENTO
(lateralDE
force)
MAXIMO
W
A
g
u0t
= 0, 2, 5,10 and 20 %
A
W
g
70
d 10%
27Gabriella Mulas
Maria
The adoption
of normalized
scales shows
more directly
the relation
between the
response
spectrum and
the ground
motion
parameters
Th
is
ve
R.
tec
cu
be
re
sp
an
27
71
The adoption
of normalized
scales shows
more directly
the relation
between the
response
spectrum and
the ground
motion
parameters
CONCEPTO
DE ESPECTRO DE RESPUESTAn
Tn < Ta = 0.035s
Da
Ai
Ma
stat
gro
u
2
n
At
u
t
0
ug
At
ug
ut t
ut
A ug0
ut
30
Proyecto Estructural - Prof. Michele Casarin
Maria Gabriella Mulas
72
29
ESPECTRO
DE RESPUESTA
Elastic design spectrum
Mean spectrum over 10 ground motions
Elasti
he same peak
h of them
Vi and Ai
provide probability
each period Tn
42
Mean spectru
The design
statistical
ana
recorded
response
spec
Factors
If noneadop
ha
the motions
scales are
over 10 recor
Connecting
a
The impo
values gives
The spec
ma
response
The dis
connecting
al
one standard
The fau
gives the mea
The geo
standard dev
site
Mean spectru
The thro
loc
idealized
lines (dashed
figure)
Proyecto
Estructural
- Prof. Michele Casarin
Maria Gabriella
Mulas
73
l analysis of the
er I of ground motions
me history and the
cceleration
74
rum
Collapse
Im
p
e
r
ia
lC
o
u
n
ty
S
e
r
v
ic
e
s
B
u
ild
in
g
a
fte
rth
e
Im
p
e
r
ia
l
V
a
lle
y
,C
a
lifo
r
n
ia
e
a
r
th
q
u
a
k
e
o
fO
c
t.1
5
,1
9
7
9
O
liv
e
V
ie
w
H
o
s
p
ita
l,P
s
y
c
h
ia
tr
ic
D
a
y
C
a
r
e
C
e
n
te
ra
fte
rS
a
n
Proyecto
Estructural
Prof.
Michele
Casarin
F
e
r
n
a
n
d
o
e
a
r
th
q
u
a
k
e
o
fF
e
b
9
,1
9
7
1
75
ESPECTRO DE RESPUESTA
ESPECTRO INELASTICO DE DISENO
76
ESPECTRO DE RESPUESTA
77
pseudoacceleration design
ESPECTROInelastic
DE RESPUESTA
78
This format of
the inelastic
design
spectrum is
contained in
seismic codes
79
80
81
Ambas ecuaciones contienen las dos incognitas, por lo tanto deben ser resueltas
simultaneamente.
82
83
84
85
-Calcular respuesta en cada modo, primero el desplazamiento del nodo U(t) y luego
la fuerza asociada en el elemento.
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
EJEMPLO
93
EJEMPLO
94
EJEMPLO
95
EJEMPLO
96
-Probabilidad annual de falla elstica: 1 a 3% por fuerzas ssmicas, 0,01% por cargas
gravitacionales.
97
-No todos los mecanismos inelsticos son aceptados: unos disipan energa y otros ocasionan
fallas.
PRINCIPIOS BSICOS:
-Seleccin de configuracin estructural para una respuesta inelstica
-Seleccin y detallado adecuado de puntos de deformacin inelstica
98
PRINCIPIOS BSICOS:
-Seleccin de configuracin estructural para una respuesta inelstica
-Seleccin y detallado adecuado de puntos de deformacin inelstica
99
100
101
Prdidas humanas deben prevenirse inclusive para los sismos mas Fuertes. Ocurren daos
irreparables pero nunca el colapso.
102
103
104
105
106
REGULARIDAD EN PLANTA
107
TORSION
108
REGULARIDAD EN PLANTA
109
REGULARIDAD EN PLANTA
110
REGULARIDAD EN PLANTA
111
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
112
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
113
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
114
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
115
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
116
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
117
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
118
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN
119
REGULARIDAD EN ELEVACIN