Está en la página 1de 61
Volume 37 Number 2 AUGUST 2006 ISSN 0046-5828 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Journal of the SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOT SHNICAL SOCIETY Sponsored by ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 37, No. 2, AUGUST 2006 CONTENTS ‘Main Papers: DEM Analysis of SoiLPipeline Interaction in Sand Under Lateral and Upward Movements at Deep Embeent by. Vimsin and K. Sopa laflunce of Salt Additive in Lime Stabilization on Organic Clay byS.Koslanan,K. Onitsuka and T. Negom ‘eterinaton of Partitioning and Dispersion CoefMcint Using Column Tests by MA. Tanchuling, J Takemura, M.A. Khan and O.Kusakabe Seale Effect on Fracture Mechanisms of Non-Persistent Rock Joints Under Uniaxial Loading yO. Mughiede and I Khawaldeh Consolidation Behavior of Reconstuted Bangkok Clay by B. Ulrichon, TH. Seah, V.Budsayaplatorn and P. Luthenaprast ‘Technical Note: Modelling Liquefaction of Sand ina Geoteenica Centrifuge by PP. Bartake, 8 Roghanandon and DN. Singh Abstracted and/or Indexed in Geotechnical Abstracts 3% 95 na bt GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERI Published by the SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY EDITOR NOPPADOL PHIENWEJ ASSOCIATE EDITORS W.H. TING, Malaysia ME. CHANG, Singapore Y.S. FANG, Taiwan EDITORIAL ADVISERS AS. BALASUBRAMANIAM, Australia T.W. LAMBE, U.S.A. EW. BRAND, U.K. S.L. LEE, Singapore RP. BRENNER, Switzerland ZC. MOH, Taiwan V.F.B. DE MELLO, Brazit H.G. POULOS, Australia W.H. TING, Malaysia C.D. OU, Taiwan SEAGS GENERAL COMMITTEE KY. YONG (President) cD.0U A'S. BALASUBRAMANIAM S.F.CHAN Z.C. MOH ME. CHANG SS GUE W. MAIRIANG S.M.WOO T.A. OO1 WH, TING S.K. TANG S, SAMBHANDARAKSA K. PETCHGATE S.L. LEE D.T. BERGADO (Secretary-General) N. PHIENWES (Editor) JC.LI (Immediate Past President) Geotechnical Engineering is the oficial journal of the Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society. It is published three times a year in April, August and December and is sent free to members of the Society. The annual subscription rate for non-memiers is USS30 to individuals, and USSS0 to libraries and companies. Back issues are available, Cheques or money orders should be made payable o the Asian Institute of Technology. ‘Membership application forms and other details can be obtained fom: Tie Secretariat, SEAGS Row 211, AIP Library Asian Institue of Technology P.O. Bos 4, Klong Luang Pathumthani 12120, Thailand Cover Photograph: Construction of foundation ofa five-star hotel located on a beach front hill-slope made of residual soils of weathered granitic rock using a combination of shallow and piled foundation in Phuket, Thailand, EDITORIAL PANEL Dr. RP. Brenner Weinfelden Switzerland Prof. Cheng-Hsing Chen National Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan Prof, In Mo Lee Korea University Seoul, Korea Prof. San-Shyan Lin ‘Taiwan Ocean University Keelung, Taiwan Dr. Warakom Ms Kasetsart University Bangkok, Thailand Prof. Harianto Rehardjo Nanyang Technological University Singapore Dr. Satoru Shibuya Kobe University Kobe, Japan Dr, Jiro Takemura ‘Tokyo Institute of Technology (TIT) ‘Tokyo, Japan De. Tanaka, Hiroyuki Port and Airport Research Insitute Yokosuks, Japan Prof. Wilson H. Tang. ‘The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Kowloon, Hong Kong Dr. TH. Seah MAA Geotechnies, Co, Lid Bangkok, Thailand Dr. Jin-Chun Chai Saga University Saga, Japan Prof, B Indraratna University of Wollongong Wollongong, Australia Prof. Chun-Fai Leung [National Univesity of Singapore Singapore Prof. Madhira R. Madhav Indian Institute of Technology ‘Kanpur, India Prof. Hiroyasu Ohisu Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan De. Mobamad R. Selamat University Sains Malaysia Pulau Penang, Malaysia Prof. Mitsutaka Sugimoto Nagaoka Univesity of Technology Nagaoka, Japan Prof. Siew Ann Tan National University of Singapore Singapore 117576 Prof. Jian Zhao Nanyang Technological University Singapore 639798 Dr. Charles W. W. Ng ‘The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Kowloon, Hong Keng Dr. S.L Shen ‘Shanghai liao Tong University ‘Shanghai, China NOTES FOR GUIDANCE TO AUTHORS Three copies of the orignal paper (and all figures and tables) together with a Microsoft Word file should be submitted to the Editor, Geotechnical Engineering Journal, School of Civil Engineering, Asian Institute of ‘Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand. Papers under review, accepted for publication, or published elsewhere ae not accepted, ‘The review and publication procedures will be faster ifthe basic requirements listed below are followed. 1, The manuscript including abstract and references must be typed double-spaced in Times New Roman 12 ‘on one side of Ad paper witha margin of 25 mm on each sie. 2. The length of titles must not exceed 70 characters and spaces. 3. The maximum length of papers in the print format of the Joumal is 12 two-column pages in single- spaced in Times New Roman 9 including figures and tables. A Journal page contains approximately 11040 words, Authors can approximate manuscript length by counting the number of words on atypical ‘manascrpt page and multiplying that by the numberof total pages (except for tables and figures), Add ‘word-equivalents for figures and tables by estimating the portion of the journal page each will occupy ‘when reduced to fit on a 160 mm x 240 mm joumal page. A figure reduced fo one-quarter of a page ‘would be 260 word-equivalents. When reduced, the igure must be legible and is type size no smaller ‘than 6 point font after reduction) 4. Figures: Line art should be submited in black ink or laser printed; halftones and color should be original glossy art. Figures should be submitted at final width Le. 90 mm for one column and 185 mm for two columns. ‘The font ofthe legends should be in Times New Roman and should use capital eters forthe first letter of the first word only and use lower case for the rest of the words. Background screening and grids are not acceptable. 5. Bach table must be typed on one side ofa single sheet of paper 6. All mathematics must be typewritten and special symbols identified. Letter symbols should be defined ‘when they first appear. 7. The paper must end witha set of conclusions. 8. Practical applications should be included, if appropriate 9. [experimental data andor relations fitted to measurements are presented, the uncertainty of the results ‘must be sited, The uncertainty must include both systematic (bias) errors and imprecision. 10. Authors need not be Society members, Each author's full name, Society membership grade (if applicable), present title and affiliation, and complete mailing address must appear as e footnote atthe ‘bottom of the first page ofthe paper. 11, Each author must use SI (Intemational System) us given in parentheses or in an appendix. 12, References should appear in the text as the author name(s) followed by the year of publication in parentheses. A list of references must be given atthe end ofthe text in alphabetical order in capitals and ‘double spacing must be used between references. An example of the format to be used in reference list are given below. and units acceptable in SI. Other units may be HOEK, E. and BROWN, E-T. (1982). Underground Excavations in Rack nd Editon). London: The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 527p. PUN, W-K. and AMBRASEYS, N.N, (1992). Earthquake data review and seismic hazard analysis for the Hong, Kong region. Earthquake Enginoering and Structural Dynamics, Nol 21, No. 1, pp. 433-43, RAMASAMY, N. (1992). Sof ground tunneling in Bangkok subsoils, M. Eng. Thesis, Asian Instute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, TATSUOKA, F. and KOHATA, Y. (1994). Stiffness of hard soils and soft rocks in engineering applications. Proceedings of the I" International Conference on Prefailure Behaviour of Geomaterials, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 2, pp. 947-1063. DEM ANALYSIS OF SOIL-PIPELINE INTERACTION IN SAND UNDER LATERAL AND UPWARD MOVEMENTS AT DEEP EMBEDMENT pene interactions under lateral and ypsard pipe movements in sand ae investigated using DEM fnalysia The simulstions are performed for both medium ad dense stad condition at different emsbedment ratios of up 60. The comparison of peak dimensionless forces ftom the DEM and caler FEM analyses shows tht, for medium sand, both methods show simile peak dimensionless fores. For dese sand, the DEM analysis gives more gradual tanstion of ‘hallow to deep failure mechanisms than the FEM analysis andthe pak dimensionless forces avery deep depth are higher in the DEM analysis thn inthe FEM analysis. Comparison of the deformation mechanism suggests that this due to the Aifferences in soil movements around the pipe associated with its pariculete nature The DEM analysis provides ‘supplementary data of the sl-ppelin interaction i sand at dep embedent condition, ‘Keywords: DEM Arayss, FEM Analysis, Sil-ppolin inerastion, Numerical simlations| INTRODUCTION ‘An understanding of pipeine response to vertical and Intra ground movements fs esential in pipeline design, Rational design under these conditions requires knowledge of soil forces reating from the relive soil-ppelie Aisplacement. "The design formulations of the Toad: tdsplacement characteristics for soil-piptine interactions sre given by ASCE's "Guideline forthe Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline System (1984)". This Guideline recommends that the peak dimensionless fores and the displacement at peak ores are functions of the embeeent depth ofthe pipe and sol ition angle, and thatthe non linear relationship between the force and displacement is rmodeled by a rectangular hyperbola. These design values ae derived ffom the database of pipe testing at relatively Shallow embedment depths. However, thee are suations ‘where the pipe embedment ratios ean be deeper than the ‘ales given in the guideline. Typical scenarios are the Construction of a large embankment over an ara iting pipelines and installation of deep ipeines dc to Siready congested underground space If the desig is based on a linear extapolation fom the ASCE dat, the Guideline would provide vory large vales fr te peak Toad exerted on the pipe and the sitfass of the sai-ppeine Ieraction This potential overestimation would in ura results n uneconomical design ‘The deep embedded pipeline problem has been invesigated. by ‘Yimsin et al (2008). They examined various analytical solutions availble for the peak forces ‘onto a pipe or srp ico and showed ha there arc lege differences in the computed peak dimensionless forces for ‘deep embedment conditions Tt was concluded that «Hest fextupolition fiom the ASCE data derived fom shallow depth condition should not be employed because of the change in flue mechanism fom shallow (ce. ground Surface dependen) to deep embedment conditions (ve (ground surface independen). ‘They performed finte lement analysis to examine the tansition in both median nd dene sands. Unfortunately its not possible to validate their findings because ful-sal pipe loading experimental results or any ther spplementary dasa ot availabe ‘Assistant Profesor, Deparinet of Chil Eien. Barapa Universi Senook, Mean, Chonbus 2011, Thad (Conespondig aur Ema yiamisbouae) "Spear, Deparment of Engoning, Unversity of ‘Cantige,Trampingion See, Cobre CBD TPZ, UK. This stay hasbeen underaken ww provide supplementary dats for deep embedded pipes using the Distinet Flemeat Method (DEM). Fist, DEM analysis wat conducted for shallow embedment “depth conditions #0 Calibrate the input parameters by comparing the results to ‘he experimental data epated by Trautmann and O'Rourke (1983). The analysis was then extended to deeper fembedment conditions. Duct its dinconinsows nate, i {considered that DEM should tetersimulte the soll ‘movement closet the pipe at large pipe displacements and, hence, may yield more realise fete to the problem compared the contnaum-based Finite element aa DISTINCT ELEMENT METHOD ANALYSIS ‘Model Assumptions ‘The pipe loading experiments were simulated using the Aisint element method based onthe approach by Cundal snd Stack (1979). The distinct clement code PFC® (tasca, 1999) was employed. Arbitrary sized spherical particles are weated as gid bodies and are allowed to fverip one another atthe ‘contact points cesting Intrpricle forces. The contacts between particles are characterized through the sles and slip condition. No bonding Deoeen panicles is employed ia this sudy 10 "Slate uncemented dry snd ‘The linear elastic contact model vas employed: the contact free and eative contact diaplacement ate inealy ‘elated by a constant contact stiffness. Two siffess values te required foreach conse: they are () normal contact stiffs Ly and. (3) tangeatal contact siiess (orceldsplacement), In this study, they are assumed to be equal (sand ~ krsand). The parametic study hows that ‘he change inthe partle tangential coast fess has minima eflects on the pipe losing resus the change in ip sand ffom fy sand to SKN sand results in negligible change in the force-displacement curve. Particle siding focure when the tangential contact force reaches is ‘maximum allowable valus, wbich is computed fom the coeficiem of ine-pariclefiton ange berween the (wo contacting entities multiptied by the normal contact free, ‘The tank and pipe were modeled by senes of planar wal, “The dimensions ofthe tank are the same asthe actu tank used by Trautmann and O'Rourke (1983) forthe casts of HID or Hib = 30 (see Fi, 1}, Whereas the with was dou- JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 63, pens on 00 230 nm scl pipe loading (UD < 30) () Upward ppe leading (HED =30) Fig. 1 Various replons of the DEM mode! (/D < 30 and HetD 30), Bled forthe cases of HD oF HD 2 30 0 reduce any ‘ourdayefets Ge Fig 2). Heri, H's the depo the tom ofthe pipe (ormaly wed in eter pipe losing ses) i the depth te center Ft pie nomaly {ed io upward pipe loading eases, and Ds the pipe flamer "The cela erosseson of te pe wes ‘modeled bya Ise polygon The an wall wat assumed {oe smooth: tht i nora cot shes ea {0 that of the parle tat bar aero tngetl cont Sess an eo sce fcton. ‘The pipe ha decal enact slfness in bath nal ab tape ions fd the vals ae equ 0 hat ofthe pele. The pipe tsi ufc icon angle (hy) equal alo einer parle fet angle of san (The pranetic say Sons ta the change in he pipe sre ton se between = atl fe = hs nein the force Spacer Sand was modeled as acolleton of spheres pails with its size distribution folowing the normal Gaussian isebution. Due to compton imitation, i was nok possible to model using the actual size particles (Djp~ 0.2 fm end Diy = 0:82 rm). Therefore, the sand partes ‘were modeled with larger size partles. To incense the computational sped, the size Of the patil was also varied in various regions of the mode; smaller paricles ‘were used inthe region where arg soi defermation is txpested For the eases of HD o& HL/D = 30, typical ‘umercal models wed for the simulations are shown in Figs 1. tthe region near the pipe (Region A). the pales Irae Faye 125 mim with standard deviation = 2. mm (@5-timce larger than the acual sand. awed inthe experiments). Further away (Region 8), the piles have rye" 25° man with standard deviation = 8.0 mm (50 timer large), When 40D > 175 or H/D > 17, another region (Region C) vas added and it bas panicle sizes of Prwage "378 mm with standard deviation = 7.5 mm (75 ‘dnct lage) Figure 2 shows typical so models for eases with HD or #2/0 2 30. The width is twice a large a8 at ‘sed in he sallow embedment cass inorder wo redoee the boundary effects At Region D, the patiles M6 rnnge = 25.0 mm with standard devon = 5.0 rm (50 tines lgger than actual sand) Purter away (Region E, ares prices ae pled: Faunge = 37.5 mim and stand deviation = 75 ‘nm (75 times larger). This allowed the numberof particles to e less than 18,000 even for the decpent ease, Results fiom the parametric study on particle size effets shox that, the case) without small paicles (12.5 mm averge diameter) nea the pipe compates a slighly lager peak force than the case with small paaicis, Mowever te diference was les than 8. Hence ination to the pipe ameter, the particle size used was eonsiered wo Be salt enough in aed 1 eval pipe loads, ‘The DEM analysis consists of the flowing fou steps 1. Tank setup: Test tank was filled with predetermined number of reduce-siz panicles, ‘The rads of the spheres was expands 10 specified value oan 3 predetermined void aio. 2 Inka conditon: The generate bas were subjected 19 _graviationl force a rach the geosttie condition, ws es | (4) Late pipe loading (UD 2 30) “t | ans tom (b) Upward pipe loading (402 30) Fig. 2 Various regi and D230) f the DEM model (110 2 30 '84/ JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 During tis stage, there were some movements of balls due to the deformations atthe panicle contacts which resuled in Some changes in void ratio and embedment Aepth This wa taken into account by til and eror of ‘he initial void ratio and embedment depth during the tank setup stage. Typical void ratios obtained were 063 {0 069 for medium sand (0.67 was the arget value) and 1.56 to.0.62 for dense sand (0.58 waste target value) 5. Pine instalation: The pipe was placed into the model by delcing the balls that were lated atthe desired pipe Teeation, The model was then permited to. reach aulibriam by allowing the pipe to slightly adjusts Jocaton by maietaining the equilibrium conditions of the Pipe. The examples. of the DEM models after pipe {nsalation are shown in Fig. 3 4.Pipe pulling: The pipe was pulled in lateral or upwar Aiecions by imposing displacements 10 the pipe The ther direction was fee 19 move, The ration ofthe Pipe was not allowed, which i consistent with the ‘experimental ee-up by Trautmann and O'Rourke (1983), Material Input Parameters ‘The input parameters for DEM snalysis are listed in Table 1. Most of the parameters were determined by calibrating the numerical results with the experiments Sat Of (i) triaxial test results ofthe sands used fr the tank experiments (Turner and Kulhawy, 1987) and Gi thea Dipe loading test results at shallow depts (Trautman and O'Rourke, 1983), Results fom the triaxial test simulations show tht the DEM analysis (sing Asin = sand) can simulate the Table 1 Input parameters for DEM analysis Parameters Values ‘Normal conse sinew oF From Bes Vor patch ans a ‘Tangent contac ifthess of panicle, Rs ‘Nona contact sifines of pipe, sss “Tangent conact hess oF PS rape ‘Nonna eoiact iff of wal, Irena Int a ama tne nang OTD ate ond eon Tawar mg, bass Density of panicle, p(kgim!) 2740 Varies in Regions Radius of parle, ‘Yee inex measured stress-strain relationship by wing a high value of interparticle fiction angle (an gps = 30) a8 shown in Fig, 4. This unusually high valve is mainly due to the we of ‘stmoot spierealparicles, which allows excessive Panicle rolling (eg. Thomas and Bry, 1999). At low ‘ales ofthe interptle Faction ange, was not posible to achieve a good Fito the experimental data, The contact stfltess was also varied in order 1 fit he dats, Figre $ shows the contetsffnessevahated a different confining stresses andthe Tllowing empirical reitionship was blaine. 04340 p, (pin kPa) o () Upward pipe loading (medium sand, HdD= 25) Fig. 3 Examples of DEM model 5 ' Fig. 4 Calibration of DEM res test dat JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 /85 Initially this relationship was used forthe pipe louding simulations by assigning the initial effective overburden stress at the pipe level as p,. Unforunately it wes found thatthe caleulated pipe force was smaller and the foree- displacement characteristic was les sf tan the measured ‘ones by Trautman and O'Rourke (1983). This is primary because thre i significant increase inthe mcan pressure in fom of the pipe asthe pipe displaces the surounding sci The increase of mean pressure fom he inital py" rch greater thay that observed in typical axial testing ‘This in tur resulted in large increase in contac stiffness of the soil around the pipe. By considering thatthe mean pressure and hence the contact siffbess vary at various arts of the model during pipe loading, a strict appliation Of Eq, (1) is posible by implementing i ino the stress Aependent contact silfness model k= MY), where fy is the lnterparicle normal comact force. Instead, however, 2 different approach was employed in this study. AS described an the next section, the contctstifhess and ‘nterpaniole fhction values at different embodiment depts were fist back-zaleulted by fing the DEM pipe loading ure tothe experimental data at shallow depts reported by Trautmann and O'Rourke (1983) and then the calibrated values were used fo simulate the deep embedment ase. i Fig. § Relationship between contact stifness and 30, the DEM gives somewhat lager esi dimensionless force thn the FEM and a more gradual vanstion from shallow to deep failure mechanisms is observed. Figur 12 (a) also nodes {JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 /87 the relationship proposed by Oversen (1964), which is recommended in the ASCE Guideline. Oversen’s model ves relatively good match tthe computed transition of the peak dimensionless force om shallow to deep tembedment conditions but slightly overestimates the peak dimensionless forces. At HID of 40, Oversen's model overestimates the peak dimensionless forces frm the DEM amalysis by approximately 20% for both medium ard dense sd cases Similar observation can be made for upward pipe movement as show in Fig. 12(0). For medium sand, the DEM analysis yields consistent resuls with FEM anal. For dense Sand, the DEM analysis yields consistent resus ‘with FEM only when A/D is smaller than 40. For HD > 40, the peak forces computed from the DEM analysis ae somewhat greater compared to those by FEM and the DEM. Gata exhibit a mace gradual ransiin ftom shallow to deep failure mechanism. Figure 12(0) also includes. the ‘lationship proposed by Meyetof and. Adams (1968), ‘Meyethof&e Adem model does not match the computes teasiion ofthe peak dimensionless force from shallow to ‘eep embedent conditions and underestimates the citcal, peak dimensionless forces. At H/D = 60, Meyethot & ‘Adams’ model underestimates the citcal pea Gimensonless forces fom the DEM. resus by sppronimately 30% and 40% for medium and dense sands, spectively (2) UD ~40, Medium sand (6) WD ~=40, Dense sand Fig.10 Force-dsplacement relationships at deep ‘embedment depth of lateral pipe loading Stauyesnetm on © “Soteieenn ee (@) Herd =30, Medium sand (0) He/D~30, Dense sand Fig. 1 Rorce-isplacement relationships at deep embedment depth of upward pipe loading DISCUSSIONS, Soll Deformation Pattern ‘The soll displacement pattems fom the experiments, FEM, and DEM (ian §, = 30) analyses of pipeline movement in mediim sand ata shallow embedment depth are shown in Figs. 13 and 14 for lateral (H/D = 11.5) and upward (HD = 13) pipe loading cases, respectively Similay, Figs 15 and 16 show the soil displacement pattems for the dense sand cases. The DEM simulates Circular metion of soi behind the pipe, which was observed inthe experiments. I pears that larger soil mss 5 influenced by the pipe losing in the DEM compared to the FEM, especially for dense sand. This may be the reason fr theft that the DEM computes larger peak foes at deper depts. “The computed soil displacements from the DEM analysis of lateral pipe lading ata deopembedment depth (WUD = 30) ae shown in Fig. 17. For medium sand, the ‘eformation patter shows deep failure mechanism, whereby the upward sol deformation doesnot extend to the ‘ground surface. However, for dense sand, sallow flue ‘mechanism with upward sil deformation atthe ground surface is sll observed, This is consistent with the peak dimensionless force plot presented in Fig, 12(a), which shows thats deep file mechanism is reached at ~ 30, for medium sand but the mechanism at the same ‘embedment ati is til inthe wansition state in dense sand {8 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 oR sm et nn eee (2 Lateral pipe loading no (8) Upward pipe loading Fig. 12 Comparison of peak dimensionless force from DEM, FEM, and analytical solutions at deep cambedment depth ‘The computed soil displacements from the DEM analysis of upward pipe loading at deep embeément depth (4D = 30) are shown in Fig. 18, For medium sand, the eformation patern shows deep fale mechanism; however, for dense sand, shallow failure mechanism is shown. This is also consistent withthe peak dimensiones force pot presented in Fig. 1200), which inicates that a deep failare mechanism reached a i/D = 30 fr medium ‘sand but the mechanam atthe same embedment rai is til inthe transition sae for dense sand The extent of sil mass involved in the pipe loading increases ab the contact sifaess increases oF the inter panicle friction angle decreases. It was found tat the soil 4 the model boundary moves significant amount for the ‘ave of an = 0.5, indicating thatthe model boundary i infuencing the pipe loading force. This is consistent with the large peak frces computed forthe eases of tan = OS sas shown in Fig. 10(b) and 116), Selection of Input Parameters In this study, the values forthe contact stifness and interparticle friction angle ‘were selected by fitting the {canal compression data and pipe loading das. The fiting exercise indicates that both values are equally important land various combinations of the contac stiffness apd tan ‘an yield similar peak forces When & larger value of contact stifess 16 used, a smaller interparticle tition gle needs to be selected tot the experimental data, Hence, the bickccaleulted values require proper evaluation As discussed before, the use of a high value of the iner-paricle fiction angle is due to the use of smooth sphere pariles, which allow excessive particle rolling ‘This is indicated from the wiaval compression text simulation where tan, needs tobe greater than 3.0 6 ‘he DEM data to the experimental results. For pipe losing simulation, it was possible to use smaller values of inter- pst fiction angle (ke. tan g = 0 and 1.0) if larger values ofthe contact stifhess ae adopted. However, the low inte-paricle fiction angle produced unrealistic so deformation pater by pipe loading. Hence, te ease ofan $,= 301s more realistic than the ease of tan g,=0'. This 1S confimed by the fact that the force-dsplacement relationship obtained from the DEM analysis ofthe case of tan g,~ 3.0 matched well tothe experimental data The power coefficient forthe stress dependency on contact stiffess wes 0.41 from the axial compression er ‘Srultion (se Eq. (1) This i within the normal values for soils, which is approninwtely 0.5 (Hardin and Black, 1966). "It has been shown that the taxial stiffness (Young's modulus) has relationship with confining sess in the sume manner asthe contact stilfioess does (Chang and Lio, 1998). The power coefficient derived from the pipe loading simulations was. much greater Gan the normal values for soils (9 Eqs. (2) and), Inthe simulations, 3 Constant valve of contact stiffness was assigned throughout the model. As the conlact sifness varies with mean pressure, a sit application of Eg. (I) i posible by Implementing it nt the stress dependent comtctsuiffcss ‘model. This approach was not pursued inthis study due © ‘computational complication. Henee, it should be noted that Bs (2) and (3) are model iting parameters suitable for the particular boundary value problems investigated in this Ssudy and should not be considered asa ral sil bebavier. JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 89 Se Rewes Bisel yhg wea (2) Experimental tank test (Trautmann & O'Rourke, 1983) aS AMEAPLEULL Et tie (©) FEM results 90 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 Tent No. 39 Bionatar (> = 102 me Behesty = T2.6 wund —— Bagtn saa 5 TP 70 ae saa aa thee 10g ‘a8 ea aS 7 (4) Experimental tank test (Trautmann & O'Rourke, 1983) (0) FEM resules (DEM results (Gan = 3.0) Fig. 16 Comparison of di (eID = 13, Dense s ment pattern of upward pipe loading from experiment, FEM and DEM ) JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006/91 (6) Dense sand (tam $= 3.0) Fig. 17 Displacement patter from DEM of laters! pi 192 /JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 (©) Dense sand tan = 3.0) ig. 18 Displacement pattera from DEM of upward pipe loading (He/D =) JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 /93 CONCLUSIONS, ‘Te sol pipeline interactions under lateral end upward pipe movements in sand’ were investigated using DEM, ‘The simulations were performed for bath medium and dense sand conditions a differen embedment ration of up to 60. For medium sand, the comparison of the pee imensonless forces from the DEM and FEM analysis shows good mtich. For dense sand, the DEM dat show ‘more gradual tasition fom the shallow to deep fale ‘mechanism and have a tendency 10 give somewhat larger peak forces at very dep depths The investigation of the ‘oil displacement paters computed by DEM show's larger soll mass movement compared to FEM da, especially for dense sand. The advantage of DEM over FEM is ability to simulate large movement of sil around the pipe. Als, ‘he DEM analysis can continue with unlimited pipe ‘movement until eather ultimate peak force (or farther, ‘wheceas the continuum based FEM of stops a some pipe displacements before the peak Tooe ean be reached ecae large distortion of the mesh causes nurerial convergence problem. ‘The DEM results from this study confirm the findings by Yimsic etal (2004 thatthe calculation of the sol pipeline interaction at deep embedment conditions should fot basen a linear extrapolation from the ASCE data of shallower embedment depts. However, the DEM resis suggest” that”) there may be a possibilty of “underestimation of the peak dimensionless force at very ep embedineat depths ifthe design chart proposed by ‘Yimsiri et al. (2008) is employed and (i) the transition from shallow to deep failure mechanism may proceed rore gradually than suggested by Yimsir et sl. (2004), ‘The ‘esuls fom this DEM analysis together with earlier FEM analysis will serve asa Class-A prediction of future fill Scale tank ests ofthis problem, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT “The research work reported in this paper wa supported bya grant from the Thailand Research Fund (TRE). [REFERENCES ASCE COMMITTEE ON GAS AND LIQUID FUEL. LIFELINES (1984). Guidelines for the Seismic Design ‘of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, ASCE Techical ‘Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, CHANG, C. Sand LIAO, CL. (1994), Estimates of clastic. modulus for_media of randomly picked granules. Applied Mechanics Review, Vol. 47, No, 1, Paet2, pp. 8197-5206 CUNDALL, P. A. and STRACK, 0, D. L. (1979) A. iste numerical mogel for granular assemble, Geotetigue, Vol. 29,No. 1, pp. 87-65. HARDIN, B.O. and BLACK, W. L (1966), Sand stifness unde’ various tiawal sues Jounal of the Soil Mechanics ond Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. SM2, pp. 27-42 ITASCA CONSULTING GROUP, INC. (1999). PFC. Panicle Flow Cade in 3 Dimensions, Version 20, Val 1233. MEYERHOF, G. G. and ADAMS, J. 1. (1968). The Veins ae Geotechaical Journal, Vo. 5, No.4, pp. 225-244 OVERSEN, NK. (1968). Anchor slabs, calculation ‘methods and. model tess. Bullen No. 16, Darish Geotechnical Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 1 2%. THOMAS, P. A. and BRAY, J. D. (1999). Capturing Nowsphercal Shape of Granular Maia with Disk Clusters. ASCE Journal of Geotech and Geoenvironmental Engincering, Vol. 125. No. 3. pp 178. TRAUTMANN, CH. and O'ROURKE, T. D. (1983). Behavior of Pipe in Dry Sand Under Luteal and Uphit Loading. Geotechnical Engincering Report 8) Comell Univesity, TURNER, J.P and KULHAWY, FL HL (1987) Experimental Analysis of Drilled ‘Shaft Foundations Subjected to Repeatod Axial Loads Under ‘rained Conditions." Report to. Eleevie Power Research Instat, Come! University, USA, YIMSIRI, S, SOGA, K., YOSHIZAKI, K., DASARI, 6. R, and O'ROURKE, T.D. (2004, Lateral and Upward Seil-Ppeine Interaction in Sand for Deep Embedment Conditions. ASCE Jounal of Geotech ond Geoenvironmenal Enginesing, Vol. 130, No. 8 p. 830-842, 94 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 INFLUENCE OF SALT ADDITIVE IN LIME STABLIZATION ON ORGANIC CLAY ', Koslnant K. Onitsuka’ and. Negami? seuy investigate the eft of sls used aan adtve in ime-stabilzed organic ely. Genealy ime i ‘not the most effective stabilizer for organic clay due to low increase in stength Organic matters have the tendene to coat {he sol particles, caving the obstruction or delay ofthe pozzlane reaction when the lime isinwoduce. However, the test results ndiated tat when sodium sat (NaCI or calcium salt (CaCl, is added tothe ime-orgaicelay mixture, the strength of mixture increases with increasing salt concentration. The sienghinreases by 10 times with an additional of 10% sal. Furthermore, cementing products very visible in mirographs of lime salt mixcures these results wre concurrent with the strengh development inthe subiized soil. Comparing between the two sals mixtures, eta 10% salt concentration the Strength of clay stabilized with lime and sodium chide i higher than clay stabilized with lime and eakium chloride ‘Adversly, ats 2.5% salt concentration, the siength of calcium chloride mixtces is higher. The process of lime salt on ‘organic clay may be ae fllows; salts may coagulate with the cation of organic leaving the cay pariles exposed t the ime for pozzolane reaction. In ado, sal also can flcculte soil particles and reduce pore space between sol particles, reauting inthe required cementation o bridging between aggregates relatively lw. Hence, the higher strength of line-salt ‘ubilzaton could be achieved, Keywords: Lime stabilization, Salt ative, Scanning letron micrographs, Organic cay INTRODUCTION Soil stabilization by lime and cement is & common improvement method used for sabilizing the so clay aed the dredged sludge. The soft clay found near the surfice andthe dredged sludge usually contains high organic ‘content, which reduces the effectiveness of lime or cement sailaton. The influence of the organic matter has significant effect onthe strength gain of lime and cement stabilization ‘ue tothe obstruction of pazzalanic reaction. Thompson (1966) suggested. that the pozzolanie reaction we ‘bstncted in organic oil because sol patclswhic ae & primary souee of silica andor alumina used in stabilization Drocess were coated by organic ations. This “masking effet" prevented the silica andor alumina dissoluson. resulting in an absence of siiea andlor alumina in pozzolanic reaction lowever, not all of the organic compounds have a negative effec (Tremblay ea, 2002). Many experiments. were carried out to investigate the possibilities of wsing various binders including gypsum (Kuno et al, 1989), catborate-aluminae salt Kamen etal, 1989), plverized fuel ash, and blast Furnace slag (Hebb abd Farrel, 2003) 0 stabilize organi soils. Not ony the types of binders, but ko the salt_conconwation plays en imporant role in Stablzation of organic sil (Onitsuka ct al, 2002). It was reported that the adverse efles of orgie matter on satengh of abiized Soil can be misgated in sol baving high salt concemration (Onitsuka etal, 2003). To extend this finding in an application, binders of lime with addition ‘of sodium chloride (NaCI) and caleium chloride (CaCI) ‘were examined for organic soil stabilization. Lime was losted at main binder inthis research because lime was ‘more sensitive with organic than cement (Onitsuka et a, 2003) and recently cement stbiization was found to cause —Doaart Gakate, Dept of Coil Fagreeiag, Suse Unive Hone Mash, Sapueh Sap. 8408802 pan (Carespendingsubor Era O3851@et espe 3) “proenor, Dept of Civil Engnwenng, Saas Unies, ‘Hone Machi Sap, Sagn 40-850, apa. rch Associ, Dep of Civ Engneeig, Sega Univ Honjo-ichs, Sap, Sag, $4850, pan water and soil pollution by leaching of hexavalent ‘homium (Tsunecka eta, 2003), In order to identify the mechanism of stabiiation and chemical reaction during the cementing development, the {isoved elements in solution were obsorved by chemical ‘composition analysis. The main objective ofthis tidy is valuate te effectiveness of alvlimo-organie clay tmixtres in comparison with lime-organie cy etre, ‘The strength and cementing products of mixtures were ‘monitored by unconfined compression tess and seanning clecton microscope (SEM) MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Soft clay ffom Rokkaku river bank in Ariake ara, Japan at dept 0.5 m was used in this study. ‘The cay as high plasticity with guid limit of 122% and aplastic iit of 54%, Tho organic matter by ignition loss method and humic acid are quite high, with value of 12.8% and 12%, respectively. The clay faction (< 0.008 mm) is 67% Himic acid is known as one offctors retarding the ability of soil to react with binders and decreas. the soil improvement effect (Kuno et al, 1989; Tremblay et al, 2002; Onicuka et al, 2008). Soil cannot be improved effectively by quieklime i tha sil containing bumic acid ‘more than 1% And water conten higher than 100% (Kune tal, 1985), In order to investigate the influence of organic mater, the organic maser was exacted by the alkaline extraction method by method suggested by Clare and. Sherwood (1986), The extraction method iss follows: 1. Natural lay (500g of dry clay) was sired wit 1 Her (0 0.5 mol Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 24 hous by ‘mechanicel shaker. 2. The undissolved cly was removed by cenifiging snd decamation, JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 /95 43. The process was repented and the two portions of liguid were combined to find the humie acid later. 4. The eated clay was then washed with distiled water, and the suspension was brought to api of sbout 7.6 by adding hydrochloric acd (HCD #0 a normal level for natural clay. 5 The ey was seu asin by cei ent ‘The material obtained by the allaline extraction can be Aivided into two parts, which are humic acid and fulvic acid. The humic acid was precipitated by aeidiieavon of the extracted Fiquid to 2 pH of 2. by using HC! and Fluaton. After extraction, the weate clay (with organic ‘matter removed in the alkaline enriction process), was sed forthe unconfined compression test by mixing with, 10% of ime at curing peiods of 7, 14 and 28 days. Some properties of clay were changed because of organic removal process. Liquid and plastic limits were lower to about 122% and 49%, respectively and specific gravity was inereased from 252 0 236. The eay Faction of treated clay was decreased from 67% to 46%, Properties ofraural and woated clas are summarized in Table | Uneonfined Compression Tests Various binders, including quicktime, normal Portand cement, sl, and gypsum were chosen forthe stabilization, All samples were compacied by hand-vibaton 19 reduce the entrapped air. The specimens, 50 mm in diameter and 100 mm in height, were cured at temperatures of 20°C and «a umidity of 90% In general, the unconfined compression fests were performed on the tested samples at curing petods of 7 14 and 28 days, but fr some stmples tated ‘with lime and Time salts, the tests were also conducted at curing periods of I, 3, and 5 days ‘Table 1 Properties ofthe so “Treated Cay Rokkaku (Extracting Properties River organle Clay matter by NaOH) Depth fm 05-10 ‘Water content, wn (%) 13.2 5 Ligui imi, LL (4) 1416 ms Plastic imi, PL (6) st 485 Plastic index, PL 375 wa Specific gravity, Gs 232 156 Panicle sie dition, 6) Sand (2000-0075 mm) 2 2 Silt(0.075.0.005 mm) a 2 Clay (< 0.005 em) o “6 Color Gay Gay NaCl gt) 44 1s anion loss (4) Rs ns Humic acid 6) 12 : Unit weight (m3) 142 ptt (Chemis Composition An ‘The chemical compotion analysis was conducted on tested samples affer performing, unconfined compression tests. The preparation procedue is follows: |The samples were crushed by @ pestle and mora nto particles unéer2 mm diameter. 2. The samples were mixed with distilled water ata ratio of 1: 20 (aol ligu), 3. The slury was stived for 24 hours by @ mechanical shaker 44. A centrifugation for a period of 30 minutes at 3000, ‘pm was performed before Maton to separate the ‘lid from the gu 5. The concentrations of specific chemicals in the liquid slong with tsp valve were determined ‘The concentrations of cations, such as Ca, Na, Mig and Fe, were determined by the atomic absorption spectrometer (Shimaden AA-6580) the concentation of Si was salyand With’ & spectophotometer (Hach DR2400), The” Al Cconcenuation was measured by the inductively coupled argon plasma spectometer (Shimadzu 1CPS-8100), by Which the pH value wat determined fom the HyO' a OF ay ions. ‘Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) the microsructure of stabilized samples, samples Stabilized with lime and lime-alt of the “unconfined compression tests with curing period of 28 days ‘were prepared for SEM. A small pice of sample was cut with an iron wire before dying by a freeze-dry method to minimize the volume change. The fractured surfaces of samples were coated with gold before seanning by the JSM- 3800 JEOL microscope [RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS, Strength Development Figure shows the unconfined compressive strength of clay stabilization with various binders. In general, the Surength inreases with the time, indicating a continuous pozzolmic reaction from the additives. The stengths of lay with 10% and 20% quicklime at curing period of 28 ays were 100 kNim® and 199 kN? which ae relatively low compared to other binders. The strength valuss of clay with 10% coment; 5% quickime and 59% gypsum; 10%6 (uicklime with 10% NaCl; and 10% quicktime with 10% CaCl, at curing period of 28 days were G44 KNim!, 579 KNin* 1,295 KNim and 1,039 KN, respectively ‘To cxamine the influence of organic, the organic content of cay was removed through addition of sodium hydeonide (susie soda, NaOH). The emul indicated that the suength of ueated clay-ime increased to 1060 KNIm ata 28 day curing period. Among these binders, lime with NaCl and lime with CaCl, were the two most effective binders for this clay Figures 2 and 3 sow stess-sin curves of clay, one stabilized with ime and sodium chloride (NACI, and the {96 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 coer sabilized with lime and calcium eblorde (CaCI) in ‘aris proportions. The figuesindieate that stfness of organic ‘lay stabilized with lime as improved. with sddtion of sais. The salt may contibte by two folds, one 4 to cagglate with the organic cation, leaving the’ clay particles exposed to lime for porzolanic reaction and the ‘other i to ease Mocculaton ofthe so CALLE L LE EL Notes LI'L Na, Cu Tos Ce, denote iting, NaCI, CAC, ‘Treated cy, oral Porand cement and p=, repeal 2. TOLHona dences 10 of fie an 10% oF NCI So tedontes safe so wep Fig. 1 Unconfined compressive strength of et ormteens sn ¥ ow a ° es ee earner oat organs ‘The extnction of organic mater by NaOH is an fective mothod tht can remove the organic content up 0 80% (Stevenson, 1998), AMer extraction, the Liquid limit deceased from 1423 to 123%, specie gravity Inresed fiom 2520238 and stengih inreased from 100 kN to 1060, kN st 28 day curing period with 10% lime stabilization, despite of no changes in inition loss. These clearly showed the effect of organic mater in the ely Decreasing in clay faction fiom 63% 10 46% may be resulted fom Mocculaion by increasing" of salt oncenuation afer organic extraction. = tat 10% cece ‘sox Ses 00% iy i 1% e567 ‘strain % eo 0 Fig. 3 Resuts of unconfined compression test on clay ‘abiized with 10% lime and various contents of ‘alelum ebloride (CaCh) ata 28 day curing period. ‘The ignition loss value of clay before and after organic extraction was quit high about 12.8% The determination Of the change in mass of a soil sample ssimction of organic matter by ig lemperatre is subject to eror. Lambe and Marin (1986) reported thatthe organic mater determined by the ignition Joss and the chemical analysis agreed wel if non-organic Portion (quar, feispar, ete) of the soil are not Adcomposed by heat and donot contain significant amounts of adsorbed water. The igution less sa very poor measure fof organic matter in soils, which have minerals, such as ‘montmorlloites, that have large quantities of adsorbed. ‘moisture, and which ace driven off by heat. The dominant Clay mineral of Arake clay the Low swelling ype of Smectite(Ohtsubo eta, 1982). In Aiake cay, te ignion Joss method overestinais the organic ontent because both Inorganic and organic constituents ose mass during heating. The ignition loss value ofthe treated lay was sill high eventhough the orgnic mater has been removed Chem 1 Composition Analysis Prior to analysis, he lime-cly reatton mechanisms are briefly described as follows, When lime (C20) is added 0 Soil. hydration reaction occurs and. forms Ca(OH). feleasing about 17x10" J of heat per kg of CaO (6) added (Boardman, 2001), Some water evaporates due 10 the Increase inthe temperature by this reaction. The cretion of Caleum hyttonide neeases inthe pH ofthe pore wate ‘The presene of addtional Ca” may result nam inereas in ‘occulation of partite, modifying ts plasty Solidification, refering 10 the Iong-erm strength gain of sil, occurs as result ofa pozzolanc reaction involving the formation of cementitious compounds within the clay structure. The compounds are formed by the availabilty of JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 97 caloiu, while the alumina and silica oxides dissolve from the elay structure at such high alkali environment. The component reacts to form calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) tnd calcium atuminate hydrate (CAH), cementitious products tend to bond the clay particles. The degsee of ‘cementation depends greatly on the available Time, clay minerals and overall environment. Stength gun can ‘continue for several months of even years undet suitable ‘condition (Lit, 1996), ‘The results illustrate the changes in the pl value (ig. 4) and the elemental analysis of the soltion from chemical analysis at varying curing periods forthe different sixtures. The pi value of the Rokkaky River clay was about 7.6, which is else to neutrality. Aer the adition of Time, the pH value increases significantly after 1 day 35 expected, There ia clear drop inthe pH vale after 3 days, except for solution containing. a 10% lime with slight decrease asa proportion of the strength incease, However, the pf ofeach mixture was mainaiped 1a sullen level to allow mineral dsolution, I should be noted thatthe solubility of AO, and SIO, is pH dependent as israted inFig S TNL, Na Ca Te Ce, G doi tine, NC), CHC “raed ey cement and ypu respectively. 2. LOLONe donner 185 fine ao TDN cP NCI 3. Todentes Sear ary so weight Fig. 4 pl of clay stabilization with various binders Exar range of sl pl valuos, cain, Sobbty, mmoit oT2T 4S ST Bo OMI nga of pH vaues stl wer andrain Fig. Solubty of soil minerals at various pH (after Loughnan, 1969) ley + Lime 30% : i | : 2 : sos Cann Tie. ays 6 Chemical composition analysis of lay stabilized with 10% time 24h, 30 revi, 1:20, ta * sw Cy Line 14 b4 * f i » “| i a” rt & z F so 2 Pa i a - 8 ee ° “a © eae ovat oe Fig. 7 Chemical composition analysis of natural lay stabilized with 10% lime + 10% NaCl 24h, 30 revimin, 1:20 slidiquid) Figures 6 through 9 indicat the development of ions concentration including Ca, Na, Si Al and Me forthe 10% lime, the 103% ime with 10% NEC, the 10% lime with (CaCl, and 10% lime with treated clay, respectively. It should be nowd that Fe fons were not detected in any Solution and Mg concentration was relatively low compared swith other ons. ‘Tae Ca ions decreased wit ime in all mixtures due to the progress of reaction. As expected, mixtures of fme with CaCh gave high coneenintion of Ca ions due to the sition of CaCl, Inthe same manne, with NaCl, Ns ion ‘wat highest inthe lime with odium-salt mixture Based on lime-lay reaction, the strength of mature depends onthe quamity of cementing agent which includes CCSH and CAH, Calum (Ca) and hydroxyl (OH) were in excess for the reaction ay indicated in Figs. 5 though 9 “Therefore, the Si and AT concentrations gover. the ‘production rate of the reaction However, the dissolved silica concentration is much rate than alumina fo ime and Time-salts stabilization on 98 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 ‘uted clay as asad in Figs. 6 through 8. In Figures and 10, comparing beeen the untreated ely and rated clay stabilized with 10% lime, it can be seen thatthe ‘isioled silica and alumina concenvation of wexed clay ‘mixture was higher than that of untreated clay Ths may be resulted fom the removal of organic mates through ‘masking eet, producing higher stent In case of saltlime mixtures, the silica concentration ‘depends on type of sl rather than the content. nthe lime sodium chloede matures, the silica concentration was tach higher than tat dn the unteatd clay whieh was observed in previous research by Her (1955). I was ‘epted that the sodium exoride (NaCI) greatly aceleats, the formation of soluble silica. Soil sles disolution proces in ime-clay reaction may be eataly2d by presence ‘of sodium ions. In Hme-calcium chloride mixtures, the Silica concentration was slightly lower than that nthe lime- Sodium chloride mixtures, but higher thn tat in untreated. slay metre (Cay Lime 10% CCL 10% SL KC Ms —* oe Chg oe Fig. § Chemical composition analysis of watural lay ‘stallzed with 10% time + 10% CaCl, Qh, 30 revimin, 1:20 soliiqui) “rete Clay Lime 10% py Sale edo ; fe | Z¢ 8 ia a ai 24 co M9? 8 oS ws cure irs, cay Fig. 9 Chemical compostion analysis of treated clay stabilized with 10% lime (24h, 30 rev/in, 1:20 soliiiqui) Te tonteet ites coy ‘Uncontnes Corgressve Seng may rg. g ° yo pes 8078 woo § i. - 8 ! a a | bo 2507s oo acter cach Fig. 10 Average values of dissolved silica at diferent ‘mistares and unconfined compresive strength at 28 day curing period ‘By comparing between the two salts mixtures at 10% of salt content the stength of clay sabilzed with lime and cium chloride is higher than clay stabilized with ime and calkiom chloride. However at 2% of salt coment, the Strength of caleium chloride mixture is higher, Stevenson (1958) reported that organic collid canbe coagulated by clectrolytes such as salt solution, Salt may congulate with the cation of organic, leaving the cay particles expose to the lime for pozzlanie reaction. As investigated by SEM and sol propets, Oita etal. (2003) also stated that salt Solon can loceulate the sol particles then reducing the pore spice, therefore, the requited cementation to bridging between aggregates to grain the strength is relatively low Consequently by these two ations, the Timeslk mixurs can yield higher eng. lemay conclude that not only dissolved silica can affect fn strength of lime stabilization, but also, salt may ‘ontribate to coagulate with organic cation and reduce poe space between soi particles Figure 1 illustrate the proposed schematic of organic lay partiles before and fer adding Sls i the xe ia ‘according 10 assumption that sas may coagulate with te ‘ation of organic leaving the clay patiles exposed tothe lime for pozzlanie rection and pore spaces are reduced ‘ue to flection, However, is noted that in economical tnd envionment aspects additive salt may be cosy and itutlicing withthe large quantity, it wil be haf 0 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006/9 = ‘ay paricle Note: Ciay aggregate contsning humle cid eanne form Aeovgute Shaves pore spc by Ros 1) Clay patie after adding alt Fig. 11 Purposed schematic of organi clay particles before and after adding salt cnvironment (Ariizumi, 1977. Therefore, using of additive salt in ime stabilization shal be performed wit cautions Microstructure Scanning elcton microscope observations were done on the same stabilized samples afer performing unconfined ompression texts at 28 day curing period. For the clay Stabilized with ime 10% shown in Fig. 12, « Moceuaing ssmucure is visible. On the other Rand, for the clay ilzed with 10% lime and NaCl, with lime 10% and CaCI; 10%, and weatad clay with 10% ime (Figs 13 through 15), cementation canbe observed, The cementing products with thin plate-form ereate an archi store fn and between the ageregtes, which are mainly elem Slicmte ydates (CSH ~ the main cementing product responsible for cement seting, Choquette et al, 1987) CCompacing with Fig. 12, the sol particles are no as dstint since they are covered with reaction products, and the vids betveen ol particles are alo less distinc. In summary, the results were in agreement with strength development he ‘Sabilized sil Fig. 12 Micrograph of clay with 10% lime at a 28d curing period Fig. 13 Merograph of clay with 1096 lime + 10% NaC ‘ata 24 day caring period 100 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 CONCLUSIONS. ‘This research work concentates on the effectiveness and mechanism of organic soil stabilized. by lime and Seiad alte, Based on the rests, the. following ‘conclusions are made: 1. Lime satilizaton with additional sodium of ealium salt‘on organic oil yields elatvely high steagth Compared tha of lime stabilization without anys The proces of lime-alt on ergani clay may be as follows salts nity coayulate withthe ation of organic Jeaving the clay) patcles exposed to the lime for pozzolanic reaction In addon, salt an Nooculate the Teil particles reducing pore space, then the ried emonttion (© briduing between aggregates. is felaively low, Hence, higher stengih could be achieved 2. Comparing between the two salts at 10% of salt ontet the tength of clay stabilized with lime and fodium ehloide i= higher than clay stabilized with Time and ealeivm chloride, However at 25% of salt ‘conten, the strength of ealeum chloride mixture is higher ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “The experimental work by Mx. K._Obtani of Saga University Is ratefully acknowledged, The aulors also cxpress their appevition 10 Prof. K. Inoue, Prof J. C Ghai De T. Hino and Dr. H, Kawakita of Sage University for providing esuipment fr chemical composition anal 'A special thank yu to Dr TI. Seah of MAA Geotecnies Co" Lid, Thailand fr his advice and assistance. Fig. 14 Micrograph of clay with 10% lime + 10% CaCI? ata 28 day curing period REFERENCES, ARIZUMI, A. (1977). Mechanism of lime stabilization. Journal of Japanese Sactety of Soll Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tsvch-To-Kieo, Vol. 28, No.l. pp. 916 Gin apaness). BOARDMAN, Di, GLENDINNING, S. and ROGER, DF. (001), Development of sbilization and Sélidfeaion in limeclay mixes. Geotechniqu, Val, 5, No.3, pp. $83-583, CLARE, KE. and SHERWOOD, PT. (1956). Pure studies onthe effet of organic mater on te sting of foil-cement mixtures, Journal of Applied Chemis, No. 6,97. 317-324 JOQUETTE, M, BERUBE, MA. and LOCAT, 4 (1987). Minerslogieal and micrtextral changes sssocited wih lime stabilization of marine clays from Eastem Canada. Applied Clay Setnce, Vol. 2, pp. 215: ct 232, HERIB, S, and FARRELL, E.R, (2003). Some experiences sum fon the sabiizaton” of Irish peats, Canadian — Geotechnical Jounal, Vol 40, pp 107-120, ILER, RK, (1955). The Colloid Chemistry of Sioa and ‘Slates. New York: Cornell University Press, 324p. Fig, 1S Micrograph of treated clay with 10% line at 2 28 day curing period JOURNAL. OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 /101 DETERMINATION OF PARTITIONING AND DISPERSION (COEFFICIENT USING COLUMN TESTS M.A. Tanchulig"”, J. Takemura’, M. R.A. Khan? and O. Kustkabe! ABSTRACT: To predict the transport of a contaminant in soi, the paritioning coeficient, dispersion eoeficient and Porenater velocity ate required. The method of determining pore water velocity has been wellstablised, but farther work heeds to be done to determine the partioning coefficient andthe dispersion coeficlen. The objective ofthis study i 0 ‘evelop a lboratory procedure to determine such parameters. This paper describes laboratory procedure which uss the concentration depth profile in a laboratory colura. ‘The concenttion depth profile tom the experiment bad a. good ‘agreement with the analytical solution ofthe advecton- Da because of very low pore Water velocity. D, is centimated using the non-linear least squares estimation ‘method contained in the commorcialy avaiable software MATHEMATICA’ V4.1 (Wolfam, 1999). The top boundary is assumed to beat the surface of heey ayer with the assumpzion that the upper and bottom porous plate have negligible effets on the omputation of the parameters ‘The oter parameters needed to solve Ea. 7 are water content and pore water veloiy. The water content was measured afer the test. Pore water velocity can be tbtined from the Aow rato measured st the drinage ‘outlet. I was modified to get a good mass balaooe ofthe ‘contaminant, Which s explained ater. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS ‘Testing and Flow Conditions ‘There are nine test case included in this study, Iabeled as He, M2, 6, M7, eB Te, M10, Te tnd Ti-12 (Table 2. The ec presse as the hydealic Toad was vaced from 29:4 KPa o.98. kPa to be able to investigate any effect of the hydraulic gradient on the sorption behavior. Likewise, he sepage time was also varied ffom 1262 days to $423 days check esulibriam conditions. The measured parameters of the testcase ae given in Table 3. Tho porosity was computed ffom the void ratio based on the average moisture content measured after each column tet. The permeability coeficint, K was messed fom the Darcan relationship, where the ‘velocity i based onthe flow rate ofthe effluent that was ‘measured fom the actual et, Void and Permeability Figue3 shows the void ratio ~ vertical consolidation pressure telationship of the remolded ite clay withthe Same intial water content 2 that used forthe column feats Tn the oodomcter text in which the clog. P ‘elatinship was abtaine, a Tlling bead permeability tet ‘was als coniucted following the procedure deseribed in ‘Amatya (2002) ‘The eog? relation of the normally consolidated condition is given ase = 2.878 0.76Slog P. Except for 1-6, al the et cases Show a higher vod aio than what JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006, 105 ‘Table’ Measured parameters "Test Case Tet Tice me Teel nena Flow rte, O(a) 321522 378 497437386 42 Nyéraulicconductviy, K(e 10 mis)" 73827284 48° 68 55 Sd ‘Average porosity, 065 065 066 066 0st 066 0.70 0.62 Porewater velocity, (x 104mye 12 668 531 900 22 109 996 106 ‘Adj porewater veloiy, adj v(x 10% mis) 7.08 3.08270 580 82 650 656 3.40 Pore volumes (vere) S68 LIL 93168 224246 24818 ‘Average void ati, 183182 191194 174198 230 168 Total mas retained in colums, me, 446 654986 155651 “ota input mass (exp) mg 5381007 747A S98 TOK 7K 2363443 ‘Tova input mass (ai), ma 532488380377 M7719 t0s2 1712165, ‘abianed Based on flow rate a fant + based on experimental veloctty ‘sshased on adjusted velocity is expected from te tress history. This may be atrbuted to swelling ofthe clay which occurs rom the end ofthe tes, when the loads ar taken ofT upto the time when the Sample is collested. from the column. The sare bservation was made in Orava etal. (2002) The vid rato that was used forthe determination ofthe pore water velowity was based on the acuel values, as measured fom the water content of the experiment. 5001000 30" 100 log (kPa) Fig. 3 cog P relation of ite . Figure 4 shows th relationship between hydraulic condvctvity (K) obtained tom the” falling heed Permeability test. The relationship ean be approximated Py ult rion i gag wale aK (L860 "22° From Fig. 4 iis also seen that over-consalidation oes nt ae the hydrulic conductivity ofthe lay, and that the relationship between the void ratio and the hydraulic conductivity isthe same for both normally and ‘over consolidated clays. Since hydraulic conductivity ales dispersion, the findings of this study ean be compared With Ozawa etal (2000) which stidied the effect of overconsaidation on dispersion. It was ‘concluded in their stay thatthe vest history has 90 elf onthe determination ofthe dispersion cotficen. Determination of the Partiioning and Diffusion Coetficents The partioning coefficient, K, was determined using a, (6) with the measured concentration of contaminant the soil (Cus) at the top layer using the constant influent concenraion of 480 mg/L as the pore water concentration, -C. With the partioning coeicint knowa, the relatdation factor, R ean be solved using Eq (2). Using the derived, the concenttion-depth profile (ich isthe concentration a ferent pons ta ine porosity, and. porewater velocity as Input data the Aifusion cootcint was estimated in Eq, (7) by ising non-linear last squresfiting method contained in the software MATHEMATICA W.1 (Wolfam, 199). log Hyco condi, K (mi) ‘Nonally consolidate] Over enolate log Void ratio, e Fig. 4 Variation of & with Figure 5 shows repression curves of 2 cases (l-2 and Ilt-I1.1eshows that thre is incosisteney in mass alone berween the computed and measured ons. In “Table 3, the tual mass retained in the column afer the test are shown to be less with the toa input mass based ‘on the measured velocity. The velocity wis adjusted toa ‘quanti that results ina total mass which ¢ 110% of the ‘ass retained in the column. The pore water velocities that were used in the compuiations of the diffsion cveticiem were reduced by 32-99% to be able to have a oo mass balan. I-12 and Ht] have the grates (0.32) and least (099) reduction factors, respective) ‘The toa input mass based on the adjusted velocity ate also shown in Table 3. ‘The velocities used are shown in Table 3, lubed as the adjusted pore water velocities, The ajstinent in the velocity canbe justified bythe fice hat the Now rat may 106 / JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY / AUGUST 2006 t $ ‘Contaminant concentration in sols su ome Contaminant concentration a si, © nent (woe) Fig. 5 Regresion carves wing experimental velocities of porewater velocity have been overestimated by sidewall leakage. The values corresponding co the adjusted velocity are graphed ‘with the void ratio taken fFom the elog P relation and shown in Fig 4. Tho measured X values ft wel in he log ‘log e graph, but it should be noted thatthe permeant ‘cd inthe consoldation tet is de-ionized water while the K values fom the column test used zine nitrate soaton as permet ‘The background zinc concentration of illite clay was measured oe 0.0066 mg which is asumed nelgible ‘Thus, the concentration at any point inthe column atthe start ofthe testis zero. The top boundary i defied to be a the surface of the clay layer, wih he assumption that the porous stone as negligible elec. Aer one column tes, the porous stone was soaked in a 10% nite acid ‘olution (pH = 1, andthe eoncentation inthe acd bath ‘was measured to be 20 mg/l. This is the ine Cconcentation that the sone is assumes to hold and for purposes of data analyses, nas considered negligible ‘The results ate shown in Teble 4, Thre test cases (at.2, lr, te9) have 3 core samples each, I, Iie, Ie and M11 and Uh-12 have to, and Hl10 has one Results of the test cass fit fairly well with the cure defined by the advection-dispersion equation, as shown ‘sully bythe graphs of two fest cases (Figs. 6a ~b) and xcept for It, quantified by an acceptable conelation factor? (om 79 10.96). Tae results ofthe eave fing show thatthe profil is defined oaly onthe upper 2 em ‘art for most of the test cases with concentrations being eligible at locations lower han that ‘Table 4 Coefficients ofall test eases R&D (able) (10min) T1036 iO m2 8105.00 829096 Te 789463 379097 m7 849838 330079 mes 730483 308 oh Ths 126388 393090 M10 16301181 393088 Melt 1580 998 BEG OM Merz $46 380 393 ons ‘The poritioning coefficient forthe seven test eases (ith pl equal t 6) ranges from 4.53 - 1181 mbig. The

También podría gustarte