Está en la página 1de 25

CURSO

Ingenieria Sismo Resistente

Ejemplo de análisis modal espectral

Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Introducción
 25 0 0 0 0 
 
0 25 0 0 0
 
M =  0 0 20 0 0 
0 0 0 20 0 
 
0 0 0 0 15 

k1 = 50000 k2 = 40000 k3 = 40000 k4 = 30000 k5 = 20000

 k1 + k2 −k2 0 0 0   90000.00 −40000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 


   
−k2 k2 + k3 −k3 −40000.00 80000.00 −40000.00 0.00 0.00

0 0
  
K =  0 −k3 k3 + k4 −k4 0  K =  0.00 −40000.00 70000.00 −30000.00 0.00 
 0 0 −k4 k4 + k5 −k5   0.00 0.00 −30000.00 50000.00 −20000.00 
   
 0 0 0 −k5 k5   0.00 0.00 0.00 −20000.00 20000.00 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de frecuencias angulares y
periodos de vibración
 3600.00 −1600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 
 
−1600.00 3200.00 −1600.00 0.00 0.00
−1
 
K1 = M K K1 =  0.00 −2000.00 3500.00 −1500.00 0.00 
 0.00 0.00 −1500.00 2500.00 −1000.00 
 
 0.00 0.00 0.00 −1333.33 1333.33 

evp = eigenvals ( K1)

 6016.82  5to
 175.66  1ro
  4to   2do
4227.54 1093.43
   
evp =  175.66  1ro Freq = sort ( evp ) Freq =  2619.89  3ro
 1093.43  2do  4227.54  4to
   
 2619.89  3ro  6016.82  5to

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de Frecuencias Angulares y
Periodos de vibración
i = 1  5
2 
i = Freq T =
i i i

1 = 13.25 T = 0.47
1

2 = 33.07 T = 0.19
2

3 = 51.18 T = 0.12
3

4 = 65.02 T = 0.10
4
5 = 77.57 T = 0.08
5

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de modos de
vibración
v = eigenvecs ( K1)

5to 4to 1ro 2do 3ro

 0.387 0.613 0.141 −0.328 0.433 


 
−0.585 −0.240 0.302 −0.514 0.265
 
v =  0.642 −0.458 0.430 −0.349 −0.337 
 −0.298 0.543 0.550 0.126 −0.551 
 
 0.085 −0.250 0.634 0.700 0.571 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Normalizando los modos de
vibración

 1.000   1.000   1.000 


     
3 
2.140
 4 
1.567
 5 
0.613

v v v
V = V =  3.045  V = V =  1.063  V = V =  −0.778 
1 1 2 2 3 3
v
1 3  3.896  v
1 4  −0.384  v
1 5  −1.273 
     
 4.487   −2.134   1.319 

 1.000   1.000 
   
2 −0.392 1 −1.511
v   v  
V = V =  −0.748  V = V =  1.659 
4 4 5 5
v
1 2  0.886  v
1 1  −0.770 
   
 −0.408   0.219 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Matriz de modos de vibración
Normalizados

 ( V1) (V2)1  1 (V3)1  1 (V4)1  1 (V5)1  1 


 1 1

 ( 1) 2  1 (V2)2  1 (V3)2  1 (V4)2  1 (V5)2  1 


 V


 =  ( V1)
3 1
(V2)3  1 (V3)3  1 (V4)3  1 (V5)3  1 
 
 ( V1) (V2)4  1 (V3)4  1 (V4)4  1 (V5)4  1 
4 1
 
 ( V1) (V2)5  1 (V3)5  1 (V4)5  1 ( 5)5  1 
V
 5 1

 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 


 
2.140 1.567 0.613 −0.392 −1.511
 
 =  3.045 1.063 −0.778 −0.748 1.659 
 3.896 −0.384 −1.273 0.886 −0.770 
 
 4.487 −2.134 1.319 −0.408 0.219 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de Me y Ke

 930.53 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 


 
−0.00 180.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
T
 
Me =   M   Me =  0.00 0.00 105.02 0.00 −0.00 
 −0.00 0.00 0.00 58.23 0.00 
 
 0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 149.69 

 163461.99 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 


 
−0.00 197033.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
T
 
Ke =   K  Ke =  0.00 0.00 275138.89 0.00 −0.00 
 −0.00 0.00 0.00 246170.59 0.00 
 
 0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.00 900633.61 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de Vector de masas
participantes L =  T .M .I

1  284.63 
   
45.73
1
  T
L =   M  I  
I =  1  L =  19.08 
1  11.83 
   
1  8.31 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de Masas Efectivas Lei =
Li 2
Mi

2
L( 1  1)
Le = Le = 87.06
1 1 Me 1 1
( 1  1)

n
Li 2

2
L
 ( 2  1)
 Masa efectiva total
Le = Le = 11.6
2 1 2 1
Me
( 2  2) i =1 M i

2
L( 3  1)
= = 3.47
 5 
Le Le
3 1 Me 3 1

 Le 
( 3  3)
Mtotal =
 i 1 
L( 4  1)
2
i = 1 
Le = Le = 2.4
4 1 Me 4 1
( 4  4)

Mtotal = 105.00
2
L( 5  1)
Le = Le = 0.46
5 1 Me 5 1
( 5  5)

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Factor de
 T .M .I Li
Participación FPM i = i = T =
 .M . M i
Modal (FPMi)
L
( 1  1)
 1 =  1 = 0.31
Me
( 1  1)

L
( 2  1) Sumatoria de partici pacion de modos
 2 =  2 = 0.25
Me
( 2  2)
5

 3 =
L
( 3  1)
 3 = 0.18
  i = 1.00

Me i=1
( 3  3)

L
( 4  1)
 4 =  4 = 0.2
Me
( 4  4)

L
( 5  1)
 5 =  5 = 0.06
Me
( 5  5)

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Factor de  Li 2 
Participación M 
Pi =  i 
de Masas
Mtotal

P =
( Le
1  1)
 100
P = 82.92
1 Mtotal 1

> 90 %
P =
( Le
2 1 )  100
P = 11.05
2 Mtotal 2

P =
( Le
3  1)
 100
P = 3.30 Sumatoria de participacion efectiva
3 Mtotal 3

( Le
4  1)
 100  5


P
4
=
Mtotal
P = 2.29
4
Suma =
 P
i
Suma = 100.00
i = 1 

P =
( Le
5  1)
 100
P = 0.44
5 Mtotal 5

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Análisis Modal Epectral
Sa
T C = 2.5( Tp/T) C ZUS.g.C
R
0.1 15.00 2.50 254.8
0.2 7.50 2.50 254.8
0.3 5.00 2.50 254.8
0.4 3.75 2.50 254.8
Espectro NTE-030 0.5 3.00 2.50 254.8
0.6 2.50 2.50 254.8
0.7 2.14 2.14 218.4
0.8 1.88 1.88 191.1
Z = 0.4 Lima 0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9
U = 1.3 Centro Comercial g = 980 1.0 1.50 1.50 152.9 NTE-030
Espectro
S = 1.2 S2 Tp = 0.6 1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
R = 6.0 Muro estruct. 1.2 1.25 1.25 127.4
ZUS.g = 101.92
1.3 300.0 1.15 1.15 117.6
1.4 1.07 1.07 109.2
R
1.5
250.0 1.00 1.00 101.9
1.6 0.94 0.94 95.6
1.7 0.88 0.88 89.9
Sa

Sa (m/seg2)
1.8 200.0 0.83 0.83 84.9
T C = 2.5( Tp/T) C ZUS.g.C 1.9 0.79 0.79 80.5
R 2.0 150.0 0.75 0.75 76.4
0.1
0.08 15.00
18.75 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.1 0.71 0.71 72.8
0.2
0.10 7.50
15.00 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.2 0.68 0.68 69.5
0.3
0.12 5.00
12.50 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.3 100.0 0.65 0.65 66.5
0.4
0.19 3.75
7.89 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.4 0.63 0.63 63.7
0.5
0.47 3.00
3.19 2.50
2.5 254.8 2.5 50.0 0.60 0.60 61.2
0.6 2.50 2.50 254.8 2.6 0.58 0.58 58.8
0.7 2.14 2.14 218.4 2.7
0.8 1.88 1.88 191.1 0.0 0.56 0.56 56.6
2.8 0.54 0.54 54.6
0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9 2.9 0.52 0.52 52.7
1.0 1.50 1.50 152.9 3.0 0.50 0.50 51.0
1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
Ing.
1.2 Sismo 1.25
Resistente1.25
II 127.4 Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida
1.3 1.15 1.15 117.6
1.4 1.07 1.07 109.2
Análisis Modal Espectral
Sa
T C = 2.5( Tp/T) C ZUS.g.C
Espectro NTE-030 R
0.1 15.00 2.50 254.8
0.2 7.50 2.50 254.8
0.3 5.00 2.50 254.8
Z = 0.4 Lima 0.4 3.75 2.50 254.8
U = 1.3 Centro Comercial g = 980 0.5 3.00 2.50 Espectro
254.8NTE-030
S = 1.2 S2 Tp = 0.6 0.6 2.50 2.50 254.8
R = 6.0 Muro estruct. 0.7
ZUS.g = 101.92
300.0 2.14 2.14 218.4
0.8 1.88 1.88 191.1
R 0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9
1.0 250.0 1.50 1.50 152.9
1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
Espectro NTE-030 1.2 200.0 1.25 1.25 127.4

Sa (m/seg2)
1.3 1.15 1.15 117.6
300.0 1.4 1.07 1.07 109.2
1.5 150.0 1.00 1.00 101.9
250.0 1.6 0.94 0.94 95.6
1.7 100.0 0.88 0.88 89.9
Sa (m/seg2)

200.0 1.8 0.83 0.83 84.9


1.9 0.79 0.79 80.5
150.0 Sa
2.0
50.0 0.75 0.75 76.4
2.1 0.71 0.71 72.8
Sa
100.0
2.2
T 0.0 0.68Tp/T)
C = 2.5( 0.68
C 69.5
ZUS.g.C
50.0 2.3 0.65 0.65 66.5
R
2.4
0.1 0.63
15.00 0.63
2.50 63.7
254.8
0.08 18.75 2.5
0.0 2.5
0.2 0.60
7.50 0.60
2.50 61.2
254.8
0.10 15.00 2.5
2.6
0.3 0.58
5.00 0.58
2.50 58.8
254.8
T (seg) 0.12 12.50 2.5
2.7
0.4 0.56
3.75 0.56
2.50 56.6
254.8
0.19 7.89 2.5
2.8
0.5 0.54
3.00 0.54
2.50 54.6
0.47 3.19 2.5 254.8
2.9
0.6 0.52
2.50 0.52
2.50 52.7
254.8
3.0
0.7 0.50
2.14 0.50
2.14 51.0
218.4
Ing. Sismo Resistente II 0.8 Ing.
1.88 Omart1.88
Tello Malpartida
191.1
0.9 1.67 1.67 169.9
1.0 1.50 1.50 152.9
1.1 1.36 1.36 139.0
Análisis Modal Espectral
Sv Sa
Calculo de Desplazamientos Máximos Sd = =
 2
1er Modo:
1 = 13.25 T = 0.47  1 = 0.31
1

Sa1
Del espectro : Sa1 = 254.8 Sd1 = Sd1 = 1.45
(  1) 2

 1.00   0.444 
   
 1  2.14   0.950 
1 =  1 =  3.05  Umax1 = 1 Sd1  1 Umax1 =  1.351 
 3.90   1.728 
   
 4.49   1.991 
2do Modo: 2 = 33.07 T = 0.19  2 = 0.25
2

Sa2
Del espectro : Sa2 = 254.8 Sd2 = Sd2 = 0.23
(  2) 2

 1.00   0.059 
 1.57   0.093 
 2    
2 =  2 =  1.06  Umax2 = 2 Sd2  2 Umax2 =  0.063 
 −0.38   −0.023 
   
 −2.13   −0.126 
Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida
Análisis Modal Espectral
Calculo de Desplazamientos Máximos

3er Modo: 3 = 51.18 T = 0.12  3 = 0.18


3

Sa3
Del espectro : Sa3 = 254.8 Sd3 = Sd3 = 0.10
( 3) 2

 1.00   0.018 
 0.61   0.011 
 3    
3 =  3 =  −0.78  Umax3 = 3 Sd3  3 Umax3 =  −0.014 
 −1.27   −0.023 
   
 1.32   0.023 

4to Modo:
4 = 65.02 T = 0.10  4 = 0.20
4

Sa4
Del espectro : Sa4 = 254.8 Sd4 = Sd4 = 0.06
( 4) 2

 1.00   0.012 
 −0.39   −0.005 
 4    
4 =  4 =  −0.75  Umax4 = 4 Sd4  4 Umax4 =  −0.009 
 0.89   0.011 
   
 −0.41   −0.005 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Análisis Modal Espectral
Calculo de Desplazamientos Máximos

5to Modo: 5 = 77.57 T = 0.08  5 = 0.06


5

Sa5
Del espectro : Sa5 = 254.8 Sd5 = Sd5 = 0.04
( 5) 2

 1.00   0.002 
 −1.51   −0.004 
 5    
5 =  5 =  1.66  Umax5 = 5 Sd5  5 Umax5 =  0.004 
 −0.77   −0.002 
   
 0.22   0.001 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Combinación por Superposición
Modal
U1 = Sumatoria de Valores Absolutos (A BS)

 Umax1
1 1
+ Umax2
1 1
+ Umax3
1 1
+ Umax4
1 1
+ Umax5
1 1 
 
 Umax1
2 1
+ Umax2
2 1
+ Umax3
2 1
+ Umax4
2 1
+ Umax5
2 1 
 
U1 =  Umax1 + Umax2 + Umax3 + Umax4 + Umax5 
3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1
 
Umax1 + Umax2 + Umax3 + Umax4 + Umax5
 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 
 Umax1 + Umax2 + Umax3 + Umax4 + Umax5 
 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 
 0.54 
 
1.06
 
U1 =  1.44 
 1.79 
 
 2.15 

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Combinación por Superposición
Modal
U2= Raiz Cuadrada de la Suma de los Cuadrados ( RCSC)


 (Umax11  1)2 + (Umax21  1)2 + (Umax31  1)2 + (Umax41  1)2 + (Umax51  1)2 
 


(Umax12  1) + (Umax22  1) + (Umax32  1) + (Umax43  1)
2 2 2 2
+ (Umax54  1) 
2

U2 =  (Umax13  1)2 + (Umax23  1)2 + (Umax33  1)2 + (Umax43  1)2 + (Umax53  1)2 

 
 (Umax14  1)2 + (Umax24  1)2 + (Umax34  1)2 + (Umax44  1)2 + (Umax54  1) 
2

 
 2
 (Umax15  1)2 + (Umax25  1)2 + (Umax35  1)2 + (Umax45  1)2 + (Umax55  1) 

 0.45 
 0.95 
 
U2 =  1.35 
 1.73 
 
Ing. Sismo Resistente II  1.99  Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida
Combinación por Superposición
Modal
Umax
Norma NTE-030: 0.25ABS+0.75SRSS 1 1
 1 =  1 = 0.0047
100
 0.25 U11  1 + 0.75 U2
1 1  Umax
   0.47  2 1
   2 =  2 = 0.0098
 0.25 U12  1 + 0.75 U2
2 1  0.98 100
   
Umax =  0.25 U13  1 + 0.75 U2 Umax =  1.37 
3 1 
Umax
3 1
   1.74   3 =  3 = 0.0137
0.25 U1 + 0.75 U2
 4 1 4 1    100
 0.25 U1 + 0.75 U2   2.03  Umax
 5 1 5 1  4 1
 4 =  4 = 0.0174
100
Umax
5 1
 5 =  5 = 0.0203
100

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Distorsión de Entrepiso

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Calculo de Cortantes de
Entrepiso

V = k1  1 V = 234.93
1 1

(
V = k2  2 −  1
2
) V = 204.45
2

(
V = k3  3 −  2
3 ) V = 157.52
3

4 (
V = k4  4 −  3 ) V = 110.52
4
(
V = k5  5 −  4
5
) V = 57.88
5

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Fuerzas Sísmicas del Análisis
Dinámico

F = 30.48
F = V − V 1
1 1 2
F = 46.93
F = V − V 2
2 2 3

F = V − V F = 47.00
3 3 4 3

F = V − V
4 4 5
F = 52.64
4
F = V F = 57.88
5 5 5

5
V =  F
i V = 234.93
i=1

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Fuerzas Sísmicas del Análisis
Dinámico
(Método Alternativo)

 30.48 
Umax  
46.93
Fd = K  
100 Fd =  47.00 
 52.64 
 
 57.88 
5
V =  F
i V = 234.93
i=1

Ing. Sismo Resistente II Ing. Omart Tello Malpartida


Preguntas…. ?

También podría gustarte