CHAPTER 3 DE-NATIONALIZING HISTORY TEACHING AND NATIONALIZING IT DIFFERENTLY! Some Reflections On How to Defuse the Negative Potential of National(ist) History Teaching Stefan Berger INTRODUCTION34 + STEFAN BERGER levelopments. On the other hand, ted that many aspects of historical he national framework. Hence t ‘and comparative forms of his ; Haupt & Kocka, 2000; Iriye & on between the need for the nscend it. This has been between those arguing that nati entity formation, because they hold sionalism. The of territorial authority and law" (Rosh has provided a powerful critique of post y writing and instead 1s have attempted to distingy 1ed that good patriotism nous scholarship on nationalism has estab- lective national iden- the in This near constructions are xenophobic and intole 3ps best tll abou orical examples We can ional precisely because they enemies and “others.” nd this raises the question pt to construct different es? And what c these questions have for our teac indispensal past, how do we NATIONAL HISTORY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN. NINETEENTH. AND TWENTIETH-CENTURY EUROPE ned at processes of ins lyzing'in great de’ ip between processes of history waiting. Team with stories ‘concentrated26 STEFAN BERGER ‘THE CLOSE FIT BETWEEN NATIONAL HISTORY AND. NATIONALIST POLITICS level be seen as a classic example of came to discussing inst Denmark e." Treitechke jes. He was