- DocumentoCaltrain Electrification 2-22-2017cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoAppointment of Hartnett to lead CalTraincargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoOpinion on Hartnett's appointment as CalTrain CEOcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoPetition for Writ of Mandate (Atherton et al vs. CalTrain)cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoFox Habitat Violationscargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoHSR Private Sector Letters of Interestcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoAuthority Instructs URS 4-30-2014 to revise its report.cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoWilliam Grindley presentation to committee 4-22-2014cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoMemo on Cap and Tradecargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoReply to Prelim Opp appeals court #C076042cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoUnion Pacific Comments 2014 Business Plancargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoInappropriate Use of Cap and Tradecargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoTos Et al. response in 3rd district appellate court case C075668 (High Speed Rail)cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoCalifornia High Speed Rail. Judge rules case can proceedcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoHigh Speed Rail Authority reply brief Feb 10 2014cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoOpponents opposition to petition for writ of mandate in Appellate 3rd district courtcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoSupreme Court transfers Governor's Petition in High Speed Rail case to lower courtcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoSinclair Fee Versus Tax Opinioncargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoPlaintiff's response in High Speed Rail Law Suit Tos et alcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoAuthority Chair Richard responds to State Senator Andy Vidak (Nov 4 2013)cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoCalifornia High Speed Rail -- AG objectionscargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoTranscript of Senator Simitian from July 6.doccargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoTOS et al Lawsuit vs. CHSRA .. supp brief P. Jonescargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoHigh Speed Rail Plaintiffs Reply Brief on remedies - final.pdfcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoAttorney General's reply brief in Tos et al vs CHSRAcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoSupplemental Request for for Judicial Noticecargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoProposed Order on Remedies on Judge Kenny's ruling in Tos Et Al vs California High Speed Railcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoPlaintiffs Opening Brief on Remedies in Tos Et. Al. vs. California High Speed Rail.cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoBriefing Schedule Judge Kenny Rulingcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoA Major Court Rebuke for the California Bullet Traincargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoJudge Kenny's ruling in Tos-Fukuda-Kings Co vs. the CHSRA 8/16/2013cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoCalifornia Attorney General brief of August 9 2013cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoAudit request on Land Acquisitions of the CHSRAcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoQuality Bidcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoUnion Pacific Responsive Pleading and Answer (Court Stamped) to Validation Complaintcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoMorales Letter Justifying Bid Change of Rulescargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoBNSF Letter to Authority 4/16/2013cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoLETTER-MOU-3-11-2013cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoLegislative Council Rulingcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoLeg Budget Lang 120603cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoSierra Club letter on CEQA exemption for High Speed Railcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoCeqa Languagecargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoSierra Club California Comments on HSR Business Plan 1.13.12cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoFed Rail Admin FOIA - January 4, 2011cargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoLAO Contacts RE Railcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoCHSR Peer Review Group Comments on CHSRA 2010 Funding Plancargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoLetter to Board 6-12-2011 Central Valley Construction PDFcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoPeerReviewGroupCommentsonHSRLAO'sReportcargado porjoejoe48
- DocumentoDaily Post 6-06-2011 CalTrain Scanlon Compensationcargado porjoejoe48