Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
12/05/2008
Organizational power
Definition of organizational power Sources of power Powerless and empowerment Inter-departmental power Power tactics
1.Definition
Organizational power: A capacity that A has to influence the behavior of B so that B does things he or she would not otherwise do (pp.217)
The potential to influence others People have power they dont use and may not know they possess Power requires one persons perception of dependence on another person
people associate power and politics with attempts to use organizational resources for personal advantage and to achieve personal goals at the expense of other goals.
Improve decision making quality Promote change Encourage cooperation Promote new organizational goals
2.Sources of Power
5 category classification scheme by French & Raven
Reward Power
Salary, Bonus, Promotion
Coercive Power Forcing someone to do something Legitimate Power Based on position; mutual agreement Referent Power Based on interpersonal attraction Expert Power Based on knowledge or info value
3. Empowerment
4.
Inter-departmental power
Dependency
The power of department A over department B is greater when department B depends on A. Departments that generate income for an organization have greater power. Centrality reflects a departments role in the primary activity of an organization. One measure of centrality is the extent to which the work of the department affects the final output of the organization.
Financial resources
Centrality
Nonsustainability
Departments that reduce the uncertainty for the organization will increase their power; i.e. technological developments for IT Departments.
5.Power tactics
Reason:logical or rational presentation friendliness:use of flattery,creation of goodwill, acting humble,friendly prior to making a request coalition:getting others support to back up bargaining:negotiation through favors exchange assertiveness: use of a direct & forceful approach such as demanding compliance with request higher authority:gaining the support of higher sanction
Organizational politics
1.Definition
Politics is the application of power building and using influence towards intended purposes and desired outcomes. Constructive politics is where organizational interest comes before personal interest. Its also conducted within good ethical standards Destructive politics is where personal or subgroup interest comes before organizational interest or is simply building personal empire. It is conducted without regards to ethical standards
Organizational politics
2.Domains of political activity
Organizational Conflict
Organizational Conflict
The discord that arises when goals, interests or values of different individuals or groups are incompatible and those people block each others efforts to achieve their objectives. Conflict is inevitable given the wide range of goals for the different stakeholder in the organization.
Lack of conflict signals that management emphasizes conformity and stifles innovation. Conflict is good for organizational performance although excessive conflict causes managers to spend too much time achieving their own ends.
Figure 16.1
Sources of Conflict
Figure 16.3
Sources of Conflict
Different groups have differing goals and focus. Two or more managers claim authority for the same activities which leads to conflict between the managers and workers. One member of a group or a group fails to finish a task that another member or group depends on, causing the waiting worker or group to fall behind.
Overlapping Authority
Task Interdependencies
Sources of Conflict
A group is rewarded for achieving a goal, but another interdependent group is rewarded for achieving a goal that conflicts with the first group.
Scarce Resources
Managers can come into conflict over the allocation of scare resources. Some individuals and groups have a higher organizational status than others, leading to conflict with lower status groups.
Status Inconsistencies
Compromise: each party is concerned about their goal accomplishment and is willing to engage in give-andtake exchange to reach a reasonable solution. Collaboration: parties try to handle the conflict without making concessions by coming up with a new way to resolve their differences that leaves them both better off.
Conflict-management style