Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
To Cancer Research
In vitro Approaches
• Study gene in context of entire animal
• In the context of an intact immune
system
• Effects on animal development
• Study cancer stage progression
• Study tissue-tissue interactions
• Study genetic interactions
• Identify modifier loci
• Tools for pre-clinical testing
Disadvantages:
• A mouse is only a mouse!
• Targeting to correct
compartment
• Hormone-responsiveness of
promoters
• Developmental timing
• Expression levels of transgene
• Pharmacology
• Tissue composition
• Poor models of metastases
Environment Genetic Background
• chemical exposures
• race
• radiation/UV exposure
• genetic modifiers
• viral infections
• familial cancer syndromes
• immune suppression
Cancer
Aging Risk Prior cancer history
Somatic Gene
Life style
Dysregulation/Muta
• diet/alcohol
•Oncogene tion
• exercise
activation/over-expression
• obesity
• Loss of suppressor gene
• mentstrual history/parity history
function
• Chromosomal/gene
rearrangement
Intelligent Design
Growth Factors/Receptors
Steroid Hormone
Signaling IGF
TGF β
Her2/neu
Aromatase PyMT IGFR TGFβR
Estrogen
Androgen ER PIP-2
Retinoids AR
PIP-3
PI3K JAK
RAS
SMADs
Vitamin D RXR PKC MEK STAT
ERK
VDR AKT
PTEN
Inflammatory
Prostoglandins COX-2 Response
BRCA1
Transcriptional
Regulation CELL
myc CYCLE
p53 TAG
Rb
Oncogenesis
In GEM
?
Genetic Aberration(s)
(~All cells) Cancer
- p53
- BRCA1 ONCOGENES:
Her2/neu
Myc
Ras
PyMT
SV40 Tag P53; Rb
?
Mouse Cancers Human Cancers
Biology
Histopathology
Bioinformatics
Model Validation
Transgenic Targeting to the
Mammary and Prostate Glands
• tissue-specificity
• cell-compartment specificity
• developmental timing
• hormone-independent promoter
Hormone
Promoter Oncogene
BAC Recombineering
STRATEGIES FOR HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION
NEO TK
II III
II III
Insertion/Selection
NEO
II III
NEO TK
II III
II III
Deletion/Selection
NEO
KNOCK-IN STRATEGY
NEO * TK
II III
II III
Replacement
NEO *
II III
CONDITONAL KNOCK-0UT (Cre-lox)
NEO L L TK
II III
II III
Replacement/Selection
NEO L L
II III
NEO L L
II III
X
cre recombinase
Promoter
II
NEO L
III
Examples of Useful
Cancer Models
Brain
Ovary
Prostate
Breast
Lung
Colon
Pancreas
Ras + Akt Glioma Model
(E. Holland)
Ovarian Cancer Model
(S. Orsulic)
C3(1)/Tag Transgenic Model
Mammary Lesion
Prostate Tumor Progression Progression
N PIN CA
Human Mouse
ATG
C3(1)/Tag
I SV40 Tag
*
Tumor Progression in Breast Cance
Human
are needed to see this picture. are needed to see this picture. are needed to see this picture.
10% Apoptosis
Mouse
Courtesy of N. Greenberg
Lung
(T. Jacks)
Colon
Additional GEM
Technologies
Embryonic U.G.
Sinus
Retrovirus + ras/myc
Y.Li
The RCAS-TVA Technology
SA
SA
SD
X
gag, pol
env
gene X
TVA
ene Delivery with RCAS Vector
tv-a
Pr TV-a transgeni
c mouse
active oncogenes
DN TSGs
inducible genes
Cre recombinase
Tet activator
marker genes
Conditional Expression
Models:
TISSUE SPECIFIC ABLATION
TISSUE SPECIFIC ABLATION
WITH DRUG
WITH DRUG
TissueSpecific
Promoter Tettransactivator protein (on/off)
Tetoperator
Promoter Gene of Interest
TEMPORAL CONTROL OF GENE EXPRESSION
TEMPORAL CONTROL OF GENE EXPRESSION
WITH TETRACYCLINE
WITH TETRACYCLINE
Oncogene Dependence of
Tumors
In vivo Imaging
GFP
LUC
Advanced In Vivo Imaging Techniques
Choosing the right
model
What is your question?
evelopment of Pathology Nomenclature fo
Mouse Models of Mammary Cancer
• identify oncogenic
signatures.
• improve identification of
biologic
networks through
identification
of functionally conserved
genes.
Enormous Defined
Genetic Diversity Genetic Background
Evolutionarily Conserved
Genetic Networks
High Throughput Microarray
Sorlie et al., PNAS (2001
ER- stem cell Progenitor cell
ER+
Mouse
ER+
Human
The Mouse-Human Classifier is the Best Predictor of
ER Status
Human classifier
Mouse/Human classifie
Mouse classifier
Training Test
Mouse/Human
Classifier
ER+
ER-
Using the model for
pre-clinical testing
Inhibition of Mammary Tumor Progression
By Recombinant Endostatin
Control
Endostatin
Lizt, 2001
Flk-1/DKR
Angiogenes
is
VEGF Receptor
Inhibitors GSK: J. Stafford and
Rakesh Kumar
H3C
N N OMe
H
50
25
0
16 18 20 22 24 26
Age (wk)
Dormant
Mammary Invasive CA
Intraepithelial Metastasis
Neoplasia
Human
are needed to see this picture. are needed to see this picture. are needed to see this picture.
D E F
C3(1)/Tag QuickTime™ and a QuickTime™ and a QuickTime™ and a
Photo - JPEG decompressor Photo - JPEG decompressor Photo - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture. are needed to see this picture. are needed to see this picture.
Mouse
8-12 weeks 17+ weeks
Normal DCIS/MIN Invasive CA
“Chemoprevention”
DHEA
DFMO
9-cRA
Endostatin
The Metastatic Process
dormancy metastasis
1. Genetic
2. Epigenetic-intracellular
-extracellular:ECM
MDA-MB-231
2 weeks
post injection
MCF-7
9 weeks
post injection
SCOM H&E
Experimental Alterations
of Risk Factors
• Energy balance
Generation of GEM • Nutritional composition
Models With Genetic • Hormone exposure
Changes Relevant to • Carcinogens
Human Cancer • Pregnancy (breast)
• Infectious agents
• UV exposure (skin) Determining
•Radiation Predictive
•Genetic Background Value of GEM
Models
Functional conservation
of genes/networks
Dalit Barkan
Christina Bennett
Alfonso Calvo
Isabel Chu
Kartiki Desai
Tamaro Hudson
Jung-im Huh
Mark Hoenerhoff
Claudine Kavanaugh
Kristin Kee
Hark Kim
Zi-yao Liu
Aleksandra Michalowska
Ting Qiu
Masa-aki Shibata
Christy Tomlinson
Min Zhu