Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
COMPANIES
• Demonstrate that performance management is a shared responsibility between the employer and staff
• Align individual staff goals/KPIs with Group, Company and Departmental objectives
• Improve rigor and calibration when setting targets for the KPIs
Section 2A
Performance Goals / KPIs & Targets ( The ‘WHAT’ )
To be endorsed by Reviewing Manager
Section 2B
Competencies ( The ‘HOW’ )
Section 3A
Overall Rating
Section 3B
Overall Technical competence
Section 4
Development Plan
- Core Competency
- Specific Technical Competency
Section 5
Review Discussion Record
Performance Appraisal Form
(EXECUTIVE)
The appraiser is the direct superior of the employee (appraisee).He/she sets the appraisee's targets and is accountable for his/her
performance evaluation. The reviewer is the person who is responsible for the overall performance of the Group/Company/Department (i.e.
the direct or indirect superior of the appraiser). He/she calibrates/validates and approves the targets. This form is private and confidential
once completed.
To be completed by Appraiser
Purpose of Review (Please indicate with 'X')
Mid-Year
Review
End of Year Review
Interim Review
(e.g.Transfers)
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
F C I L 0
Scorecard Perspective definition: F=Financial C=Customer I=Internal Process L=Learning & Innovation 0% TOTAL (I) 0
1) For each competency, please fill in the required proficiency level for appraisee's position in column (C).
1 Communication
2 Teamwork
3 Innovation & Change
4 Accountability
5 Organising, Planning &
Decision Making
6 Composure
7 Business Acumen
8 Service Orientation
(F) TOTAL 0
COMPETENCIES RATING SCALE
(G) AVERAGE SCORE (F / 8) 0.0 1 2 3 4 5
Needs Need Some Meets Exceed Exceed All
(H) COMPETENCY SCORE (G) x (W2) 0 Most Improveme Requireme Some Requiremen
Improveme nt nts Requireme ts
nt nts
Performance Appraisal Form
2.6 - 3.5 Meets Requirements SM, Manager Able to offer sound advice and demonstrate sufficient
technical/ functional competence
1.6 - 2.5 Need Some Improvement SE, AM Able to practically apply technical/functional competence
1.0 - 1.5 Needs Most Improvement Exec., Possess basic conceptual technical/functional competence
Exec Asst.
Technical Competency Rating Scale
1 2 3 4 5
Needs Most Need Some Meets Exceed Some Exceed All
Improvement Improvement Requirements Requirements Requirements
Performance Appraisal Form
PERFORMANCE REVIEW PERIOD Staff No. :
Appraiser to identify and discuss with Appraisee 3 areas for development under core competencies. Company :
(To be filled in
at year-end
performance
cycle)
1 Communication
2 Teamwork
3 Innovation & Change
4 Accountability
5 Organising, Planning & Decision Making
6 Composure
7 Business Acumen
8 Service Orientation
SPECIFIC TECHNICAL CURRENT LEVEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ACTIVITIES Level of Technical Competence
COMPETENCY OF TECHNICAL (To be filled in 1 2 3 4 5
COMPETENCE at year-end
performance
review)
APPRAISEE
Yes No
1. My targets and goals for the year were communicated to me at the start of the performance period
2. My appraiser and I conducted a mid-year review
3. I was given feedback and coaching throughout the year
4. My reporting manager conducted my annual review with me, providing feedback on my performance
5. My reporting manager has discussed my developmental plans with me
Involvement in Internal & External Activities and Level of Achievement/Contribution
(i.e Internal - KSRF, Suri etc., External - Industry Association, Standards Organisation etc.)
Appraisee's Comments:
Appraisee's Signature: Date:
APPRAISER
Reporting Manager's Comments:
Reporting Manager's Signature: Date:
REVIEWER
Reviewing Manager's Comments:
Reviewing Manager's Signature: Date:
What happens during Performance Planning?
performance expectations are clear and that employees are aware of the criteria that will
be used for their performance assessments as at the end of the performance cycle it will
minimize surprises arising from performance ratings and reward
useful check points to review employee progress against set goals and targets and
demonstrated behaviors against targeted competency proficiency levels
Multi-Source Assessment (MSA)
gathers feedback from many sources
Colleague
Self
Subordinate External
Shared Support Customer
Staff
Objectives of Performance Assessment
Performance assessment is a formal opportunity for reporting managers to
assess staff performance against pre-determined goals and targets and
targeted competency proficiency levels, using the rating scale
REWARD
“WHAT”
Customer Financial
Business KPI 1 KPI 2
Value Driver
Performance
Drivers
Analysis Processes People Bonus
s nal P ec na mr of r e P KPI 3 KPI 4
Increments
+
“HOWS’ Base Salary
Communication
Teamwork Benefits
Innovation & Change
Accountability
Organising, Planning & Decision Making
Composure
Business Acumen
Measurement Service Orientation
Good Assesment Of The Performance
Management
Encourage staff to undertake a more persistent, innovative and strive to improve the
achievement of a better time to time.
To produce a deep awareness of the aspects of discipline, ethics and safety among workers.
Cultivate personnel changes to the way in which rewards are related to productivity.
Summary