Está en la página 1de 17

Submitted to:

Sir Ahmed Bilal


Submitted by:
Amna Rehmat
Anum Amjad
Ansa Imtiaz
Huma Sajjad
 Relationship between members of a group
that are assigned connected tasks within a
company.
 Group of two or more people
 Dynamics are affected by role and
responsibilities and have a direct result on
productivity.
 In order to reach that goal the team members rely on one
another and if one part of the team dynamic doesn't work
then this can impact on their overall performance and
ability to meet their goal.
 Positive team dynamics occur when team members trust
each other, work collectively, and hold each other
accountable. When a team has a positive dynamic, its
members are more successful and there is less chance of
conflict.
 A team with poor dynamics includes people whose
behavior disrupts work flow and results in wrong choices,
poor decision-making or no decision-making at all. Poor
dynamics leave the team more vulnerable to conflicts
 Task characteristics
 better when tasks are clear, easy to implement
 Task interdependence
 Share common inputs ,processes ,or outcomes

 Team size
 Smaller teams are better
 But large enough to accomplish task

 Team composition
 Members motivated or competent to perform task in a team
environment
 Team diversity
 Groups are a social community, consisting of two or more
people who have something in common. A team is a special
instance of a group in which the commonality is a shared
goal.
 Team they are more formal as their roles are well
defined in advance
 Group they are more informal as the roles are not to be
defined here. Member of a group may or may not have any
personal relationship with their group members.
 Integrity
 Competence
 Consistency
 Loyalty
 Openess
 Refuse to share issues and concerns
 Depend too much on leaders
 Form subgroups
 Hide conflict
 Fail to follow through on decisions
Forming

Adjourning Storming

Performing Norming
Context Composition
Adequate resources Skills
Leadership & structure Personality
Climate of trust Roles
Performance, Size
evaluation & reward Members flexibity
Team
effectiveness
Process Work design
Common purpose Autonomy
Specific goals Skill variety
Team efficacy Task identity
Managed level of Task significance
conflict
Accountability
 “The degree to which members are attracted
to one another and are motivated to stay on
the team”
 Causes of team cohesiveness
 Team size
 Member interaction
 Team success
 Member similarity
 External challenges
 Want to remain members
 Willing to share information
 Strong interpersonal bonds
 Want to support each other
 Resolve conflict effectively
 More satisfied and experience less stress
Cohesiveness
High Low
High Moderate
High productiv productiv
ity ity

Performance
Moderate
Low Low to low
productiv productiv
ity ity
 Reward systems
 Communication systems
 Organizational leadership
 Physical space
Advantages
 Make better decisions
 Better information sharing
 Higher employee motivation
Disadvantages
 individuals better/faster on some tasks
 Social loafing
 Process losses-cost of developing and
maintaining teams
 Make individual performance more visible
 Form smaller teams
 Specialize tasks
 Measure individual performance
 Team norms should encourage critical
thinking
 Ensure neither leader nor any member
dominates
 Maintain team size
 Introduce effective team structures

También podría gustarte