Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Inflow
START
Qin
L2
Solenoid
L1
SP
P Solenoid
power supply
Qout
In On/Off control- control signal is either 0% or 100%
Control at set point not achievable, a dead band must be
incorporated
Useful for large , sluggish system particularly those incorporating
electric heaters
Examples- Large tank level control
- Lube oil tank temperature control by heaters
BASIC PROPORTIONAL CONTROL
V1
Qo=50
Qin 50%
60% Air to Close Qo=60
SP
50kPa
40kPa 20-100 kPa
LT
50t/h
60t/h
Qout
P.C provides a control signal, proportional to the magnitude
and direction of the error signal.
e(error)= SP - M
m=ke + b
PB=proportional band
100%
Gain(k)=
PB
V1
Flow Change
50%
60% Air to Open Kp=1
Qin Kp=2
Kp=5
LIC Kp= 1
5
2
Outflow
Inflow
t0
t
t t1
t0
Offset New Level SP
Offset New Level SP
Level originally SP t1
t1
STEP
CHANGE
TIME
WIDE PB
OFFSET
MODERATE PB
NARROW PB
SUMMARY & OPTIMUM PB
Highly stable but sluggish system
Fast acting system with large offset
Unstable on/off system
Require bias to avoid undesirable situation because m= ke, so m=
ke + b
Optimum setting for PB should result in the process decaying in a ¼ decay
mode
A/4 A/16
A
RESET OF INTEGRAL ACTION
To restore the process to the set point after disturbance then only
proportional is insufficient
The additional inflow must replace the lost volume
Outflow
Inflow
Set point
Offset removed
Ke Proportional
Response
Example
• m = control signal
• e = error signal (e = SP . M) ∴(+ or -)
• k = controller gain (↑↑ = −) (↑↓ = +)
• TR = reset time (MPR)
• b = bias signal
The proportional mode considers the present state of the process error
The integral mode looks at the past history of the error
The derivative mode anticipates the future values of the error and acts on
that prediction
Derivative is related to the rate of change of the error signal and an
anticipatory control, which provides a large initial control signal to limit
the final deviation
input
output Proportional
action
Derivative
action
PHENOMENA
Mathematical equation for PD controller
• m = controller signal
• k = controller gain
• TD = derivative time
• e = error
• b = bias signal
Process A C
t0 t1 t2 Time
Proportional action
A-B
Rate action due to end of increase in e
Rate action Rate action
A-B B-C
Control Control signal at end of excursion
signal
Rate action due to end of increase in e
Proportional action
B-C
SUMMARY
Derivative or rate action is anticipatory and will usually reduce, but
not eliminate, offset.
Its units are minutes (advance of proportional action).
It tends to reduce lag in a control loop.
Its use is generally limited to slow acting processes.
PID Response
PID Tuning
The term tuning is used to describe methods used to select the best
controller setting to obtain a particular form of performance.
There are three methods that widely used for tuning
Final value
Maximum
Measured gradient line
Variable
Response of
Controlled variable
M
Percentage change of
the variable per minute
Original value
Time
L
Start of test signal
Criteria given by Ziegler and Nichols
Type of Kp Ti Td
controller
P P/ML
PI 0.9/ML 3.3L
PID 1.2P/ML 2L 0.5L
The basis behind these criteria is to give a closed-loop response for the
system which exhibits a quarter amplitude decay
EXAMPLE
8 L = 5 min
M = 8/10 = 0.8 % / min
Kp = 1.2P / ML = 1.2 X 10/0.8 X 5 =3
Ti = 2L = 10 min
Td = 0.5L = 2.5 min
0
5 10 15
0
2. Ultimate cycle method
1. Set the controller to manual operation and the plant near to its normal
operating conditions.
2. Turn off all control modes but proportional.
3. Set Kp to a low value, i.e. the proportional band to a wide value.
4. Switch the controller to automatic mode and then introduce a small set-
point change, e.g. 5 to 10% and observe the response.
5. Set Kp to a slightly higher value, i.e. make the proportional band
narrower.
6. Introduce a small set-point change, e.g. 5 to 10% and observe the
response.
7. Keep on repeating 6 and 7 until the response shows sustained oscillations
which neither grow nor decay.
Note the value of Kp giving this condition (Kpu) and the period (Tu) of the
oscillation.
tu
Type of Kp Ti Td
controller
P 0.5 Kpu
PI 0.45 Kpu Tu/1.2
PID 0.6 Kpu Tu/2 Tu/8
2. Quarter Amplitude Decay
Controlled
variable
If the amplitude decay is greater than a
quarter the proportional gain is increased
If the amplitude decay is less than a quarter T
the proportional gain is decreased
By method of trial & error the test input is
repeated until a quarter wave amplitude decay
is obtained Time