0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
87 vistas8 páginas
Early English writers saw no difference between administrative law and constitutional law. However, others argued that constitutional law describes government structures at rest while administrative law describes them in motion. Jennings viewed administrative law as dealing with organization, functions, and powers of administrative authorities, while constitutional law deals with principles relating to state organization and relationships. Countries with written constitutions find it easier to differentiate between the two fields, with constitutional law deriving from the constitution and administrative law from other sources. Today, administrative law is recognized separately from constitutional law, though they sometimes overlap in an area termed the "watershed." In India, this watershed includes constitutional controls on administrative authorities and administrative agencies established by the constitution.
Early English writers saw no difference between administrative law and constitutional law. However, others argued that constitutional law describes government structures at rest while administrative law describes them in motion. Jennings viewed administrative law as dealing with organization, functions, and powers of administrative authorities, while constitutional law deals with principles relating to state organization and relationships. Countries with written constitutions find it easier to differentiate between the two fields, with constitutional law deriving from the constitution and administrative law from other sources. Today, administrative law is recognized separately from constitutional law, though they sometimes overlap in an area termed the "watershed." In India, this watershed includes constitutional controls on administrative authorities and administrative agencies established by the constitution.
Early English writers saw no difference between administrative law and constitutional law. However, others argued that constitutional law describes government structures at rest while administrative law describes them in motion. Jennings viewed administrative law as dealing with organization, functions, and powers of administrative authorities, while constitutional law deals with principles relating to state organization and relationships. Countries with written constitutions find it easier to differentiate between the two fields, with constitutional law deriving from the constitution and administrative law from other sources. Today, administrative law is recognized separately from constitutional law, though they sometimes overlap in an area termed the "watershed." In India, this watershed includes constitutional controls on administrative authorities and administrative agencies established by the constitution.
Law and Constitution To the early English writers on administrative law there was no difference between administrative law and constitutional law. Therefore, Keith observed: It is logically impossible to distinguish administrative from constitutional law and all attempts to do so are artificial. However, according to Holland, the constitutional law describes the various organs of government at rest, while contd……. Contd…… while administrative law describes them in motion. Therefore according to this view, the structure of the legislature and the executive comes within the purview of constitutional law, but their functioning comes within the sphere of administrative law. According to Jennings view, “administrative law deals with the organisation, functions, powers and duties of administrative authorities while constitutional law deals with the general principles contd….. Contd…… relating to the organisation and powers of various organs of the State and their mutual relationships and relationship of these organs with the individual. In other words, constitutional law deals with fundamentals while administrative law deals with the details. Importance of Written Constitution and easy to differentiate In countries which have written constitutions, the difference between Constitutional law and Administrative law is not so blurred as it is in England. In such countries, the source of constitutional law is the Constitution while the source of administrative law may be statutes, statutory instruments, precedents and customs. “Watershed” in Administrative Law Today administrative law is recognised as a separate, independent branch of the legal discipline, though at times these two may overlap. The correct position seems to be that if one draws two circles of administrative law and constitutional law, at a certain place they may overlap and this area may be termed as the “watershed” in administrative law. Watershed and Indian Position In India, in the watershed one can include the whole control mechanism provided in the Constitution for the control of administrative authorities, i.e. Articles 32, 136, 226, 227, 300 and 311. It may also include the study of those administrative agencies which are provided for by the Constitution itself, i.e. Inter-State Council (Art. 263); Finance Commission (Art. 280); Inter-State Water Dispute Authority (Art. 262); contd……. Contd…… Public Service Commissions (Art. 315) and Election Commission (Art. 324). It may further include the study of Constitutional Limitations on Delegation of Powers to the administrative authorities and also those provisions of the Constitution which place fetters on administrative action, i.e. fundamental rights.