revolution Effects of the Industrial Revolution in England Laissez-faire Economics
A policy of minimum governmental interference in the
economic affairs of individuals and society. During the enlightenment a theory of laissez faire economics emerged, which argued that businesses should be allowed to operate free of government regulations. Adam Smith in his book Wealth of Nations posited that the economy should be governed by the natural forces of supply and demand and competition among businesses. This became the prevailing economic system during the Industrial Revolution. Rise of Big Businesses With new technology came the need for investment of large amounts of money in businesses. To acquire money, business owners sold stocks and shares in their companies to investors. Each stockholder owned a part of the company. Stockholders allowed businesses to expand. Working conditions The working class—who made up 80% of society—had little or no bargaining power with their new employers. Since population was increasing in Great Britain at the same time that landowners were enclosing common village lands, people from the countryside flocked to the towns and the new factories to get work. This resulted in a very high unemployment rate for workers in the first phases of the Industrial Revolution. Henry Mayhew studied the London poor in 1823, and he observed that “there is barely sufficient work for the regular employment of half of our labourers, so that only 1,500,000 are fully and constantly employed, while 1,500,000 more are employed only half their time, and the remaining 1,500,000 wholly unemployed”. As a result, the new factory owners could set the terms of work because there were far more unskilled labourers, who had few skills and would take any job, than there were jobs for them. And since the textile industries were so new at the end of the 18th century, there were initially no laws to regulate them. Desperate for work, the migrants to the new industrial towns had no bargaining power to demand higher wages, fairer work hours, or better working conditions. Many of the unemployed or underemployed were skilled workers, such as hand weavers, whose talents and experience became useless because they could not compete with the efficiency of the new textile machines. In 1832, one observer saw how the skilled hand weavers had lost their way and were reduced to starvation. “It is truly lamentable to behold so many thousands of men who formerly earned 20 to 30 shillings per week, now compelled to live on 5, 4, or even less.” For the first generation of workers—from the 1790s to the 1840s—working conditions were very tough, and sometimes tragic. Most labourers worked 10 to 14 hours a day, six days a week, with no paid vacation or holidays. Each industry had safety hazards too; the process of purifying iron, for example, demanded that workers toiled amidst temperatures as high as 130 degrees in the coolest part of the ironworks. Under such dangerous conditions, accidents on the job occurred regularly. A report commissioned by the British House of Commons in 1832 commented that "there are factories, no means few in number, nor confined to the smaller mills, in which serious accidents are continually occurring, and in which, notwithstanding, dangerous parts of the machinery are allowed to remain unfenced." The report added that workers were often "abandoned from the moment that an accident occurs; their wages are stopped, no medical attendance is provided, and whatever the extent of the injury, no compensation is afforded.” As the Sadler report shows, injured workers would typically lose their jobs and also receive no financial compensation for their injury to pay for much needed health care. Industries such as the cotton trade were particularly hard for workers to endure long hours of labour. The nature of the work being done meant that the workplace had to be very hot, steam engines contributing further to the heat in this and other industries. Machinery was not always fenced off and workers would be exposed to the moving parts of the machines whilst they worked. Children were often employed to move between these dangerous machines as they were small enough to fit between tightly packed machinery. This led to them being placed in a great deal of danger and mortality (death rates) were quite high in factories. Added to the dangers of the workplace also consider the impact of the hours worked. It was quite common for workers to work 12 hour s or more a day, in the hot and physically exhausting work places. Exhaustion naturally leads to the worker becoming sluggish (slow), which again makes the workplace more dangerous. Worse still, since only wealthy people in Great Britain were eligible to vote, workers could not use the democratic political system to fight for rights and reforms. In 1799 and 1800, the British Parliament passed the Combination Acts, which made it illegal for workers to unionize, or combine, as a group to ask for better working conditions. Living conditions As workers migrated from the country to the city, their lives and the lives of their families were utterly and permanently transformed. For many skilled workers, the quality of life decreased a great deal in the first 60 years of the Industrial Revolution. Skilled weavers, for example, lived well in pre-industrial society as a kind of middle class. They tended their own gardens, worked on textiles in their homes or small shops, and raised farm animals. They were their own bosses. One contemporary observer noted, “their dwelling and small gardens clean and neat, —all the family well clad, —the men with each a watch in their pocket, and the women dressed in their own fancy, —the Church crowded to excess every Sunday, —every house well furnished with a clock in elegant mahogany or fancy case. . . . Their little cottages seemed happy and contented. . . . it was seldom that a weaver appealed to the parish for a relief. . . . Peace and content sat upon the weaver’s brow.” But, after the Industrial Revolution, the living conditions for skilled weavers significantly deteriorated. They could no longer live at their own pace or supplement their income with gardening, spinning, or communal harvesting. For skilled workers, quality of life took a sharp downturn: “A quarter [neighborhood] once remarkable for its neatness and order; I remembered their whitewashed houses, and their little flower gardens, and the decent appearance they made with their families at markets, or at public worship. These houses were now a mass of filth and misery.” During the first 60 years of the Industrial Revolution, living conditions were, by far, worst for the poorest of the poor. In desperation, many turned to the “poorhouses” set up by the government. The Poor Law of 1834 created workhouses for the destitute. Poorhouses were designed to be deliberately harsh places to discourage people from staying on “relief” (government food aid). Families, including husbands and wives, were separated upon entering the grounds. They were confined each day as inmates in a prison and worked every day. One assistant commissioner of the workhouses commented, “Our intention is to make the workhouses as much like prisons as possible.” Another said, “Our object is to establish a discipline so severe and repulsive as to make them a terror to the poor and prevent them from entering” (Thompson 267). Yet, despite these very harsh conditions, workhouse inmates increased from 78,536 in 1838 to 197,179 in 1843 (268). This increase can only be viewed as a sign of desperation amongst the poorest of the poor. The living conditions in crowded cities weren't any better than the working conditions. As more and more people moved into the cities, large slums formed. These places were dirty and unsanitary. Entire families sometimes lived in a single room apartment. According to E.D. Thompson, “Five to nine people lived in a single room which was as big as an apartment.” With people living so close, diseases spread rapidly and there was little medical care to help them get well. Urbanization One of the defining and most lasting features of the Industrial Revolution was the rise of cities. In pre-industrial society, over 80% of people lived in rural areas. As migrants moved from the countryside, small towns became large cities. By 1850, for the first time in world history, more people in a country— Great Britain—lived in cities than in rural areas. In England, this process of urbanization continued unabated throughout the 19th century. The city of London grew from a population of two million in 1840 to five million forty years later (Hobsawm, Industry and Empire 159). The small town of Manchester, England also grew rapidly and famously to become the quintessential industrial city. Its cool climate was ideal for textile production. And it was located close to the Atlantic port of Liverpool and the coalfields of Lancashire. The first railroads in the world later connected the textile town to Liverpool. As a result, Manchester quickly became the textile capital of the world, drawing huge numbers of migrants to the city. In 1771, the sleepy town had a population of 22,000. Over the next fifty years, Manchester’s population exploded and reached 180,000. Many of the migrants were destitute farmers from Ireland who were being evicted from their land by their English landlords. In Liverpool and Manchester roughly 25 to 33 percent of the workers were Irish. This process of urbanization stimulated the booming new industries by concentrating workers and factories together. And the new industrial cities became, as we read earlier, sources of wealth for the nation. Despite the growth in wealth and industry urbanization also had some negative effects. On the whole, working-class neighbourhoods were bleak, crowded, dirty, and polluted. Alexis de Tocqueville, a French traveller and writer, visited Manchester in 1835 and commented on the environmental hazards. “From this foul Drain the greatest stream of human industry flows out to fertilize the whole world. From this filthy sewer pure gold flows. Here humanity attains its most complete development and its most brutish, here civilization works its miracles and civilized man is turned almost into a savage.” Public Health and Life Expectancy In the first half of the 19th century, urban overcrowding, poor diets, poor sanitation, and essentially medieval medical remedies all contributed to very poor public health for the majority of English people. The densely packed and poorly constructed working-class neighbourhoods contributed to the fast spread of disease. In “The Conditions of the Working Class in England in 1844”, Friedrick Engels’ gives a first-hand account of working-class areas in Manchester, describing that these neighbourhoods were “filthy, unplanned, and slipshod.” Roads were muddy and lacked sidewalks. Houses were built touching each other, leaving no room for ventilation. Perhaps most importantly, homes lacked toilets and sewage systems, and as a result, drinking water sources, such as wells, were frequently contaminated with disease. Cholera, tuberculosis, typhus, typhoid, and influenza ravaged through new industrial towns, especially in poor working-class neighbourhoods. In 1849, 10,000 people died of cholera in three months in London alone. Tuberculosis claimed 60,000 to 70,000 lives in each decade of the 19th century. People who received medical treatment in the first half of the 19th century likely worsened under the care of trained doctors and untrained quacks. Doctors still used remedies popular during the Middle Ages, such as bloodletting and leeching. They concocted toxic potions of mercury, iron, or arsenic. They also encouraged heavy use of vomiting and laxatives, both of which severely dehydrated patients and could contribute to early death, especially among infants and children whose bodies would lose water dangerously fast. Even though there were more doctors in the cities, life expectancy was much lower there than in the country. Poor nutrition, disease, lack of sanitation, and harmful medical care in these urban areas had a devastating effect on the average life expectancy of British people in the first half of the 19th century. The Registrar General reported in 1841 that the average life expectancy in rural areas of England was 45 years of age but was only 37 in London and an alarming 26 in Liverpool. These are life-long averages that highlight a very high infant mortality rate; in the first half of the 19th century, 25% to 33% of children in England died before their 5th birthday. Child Labour During the Industrial Revolution poor children often worked full time jobs in order to help support their families. Children as young as four years old worked long hours in factories under dangerous conditions. Children performed all sorts of jobs including working on machines in factories, selling newspapers on street corners, breaking up coal at the coal mines, and as chimney sweeps. Child labour was, unfortunately, integral to the first factories, mines, and mills in England. In textile mills, as new power looms and spinning mules took the place of skilled workers, factory owners used cheap, unskilled labour to decrease the cost of production. And, child labour was the cheapest labour of all. Some of these machines were so easy to operate that a small child could perform the simple, repetitive tasks. Some maintenance tasks, such as squeezing into tight spaces, could be performed more easily by children than adults. And, children did not try to join workers unions or go on strike. They were paid 1/10 of what men were paid. It’s not surprising, then, that children were heavily employed in the first factories in history. In 1789, in Richard Arkwright’s new spinning factory, two-thirds of 1,150 factory workers were children. The tedious and dangerous factory work had negative effects on the health of children. Doctor Turner Thackrah described the children leaving the Manchester cotton mills as “almost universally ill- looking, small, sickly, barefoot and ill-clad. Many appeared to be no older than seven. The men, generally from sixteen to twenty-four, and none aged, were almost as pallid and thin as the children.” Reform Legislation 1802: Health and Morals of Apprentices Act- limited the workday of apprentices to 12 hours. 1819: Peel’s Factory Act – cotton mills cannot employ children under the age of 9. Workdays for children 9-16 years old limited to 12 hours. In the 1830s, the British Parliament began investigating the conditions in factories for children. One Member of Parliament, Michael Sadler, started a committee, in 1832, to send investigators out to factories to interview children and gather evidence about their working conditions. Sadler sought to pass a bill through Parliament to decrease child labour and regulate all factories to have a 10-hour work day. The transcripts from these investigations survive today as some of the best primary source evidence of child labour. The Sadler report led to the Factories Regulations Act of 1833. This Act prohibited children under nine from being employed in textile mills and limited the working hours of children under 18. The basic act also entailed that: Employers must have an age certificate for their child workers Children of 9-13 years to work no more than nine hours a day Children of 13-18 years to work no more than 12 hours a day Children are not to work at night Two hours schooling each day for children Four factory inspectors appointed to enforce the law. 1842: Mines Act – women, girls, and boys under the age of 10 prohibited from underground work. 1844: Factory Act – (textile mills only) workday for women and children aged 8-13 limited to 6.5 hours a day. Children must receive a minimum of 3 hours of education each day. Women forbidden to do night work and limited to 12 hours of work. 1847: Factory Act – workday for women and children aged 13-18 limited to 10 hours per day or 58 hours per week. 1853: Employment of Children in Factories Act – children aged 8- 13 cannot work before 6 a.m. or after 6 p.m., or 2 p.m. on Saturday. 1867: Factory Act Extension Act and Hours of Labour Regulation Act – earlier factory legislation extended to include non-textile factories and workshops. Prohibits employment of children under 8. Children 8-13 years must receive minimum of 10 hours of education per week. 1867: Agricultural Gangs Act – prohibited employment of children under 8 and employment of women and children in a field gang that includes men. 1901: Factory and Workshop Act – minimum working age is raised to 12. The act also introduced legislation regarding education of children, meal times, and fire escapes. Working Class Families and the Role of Women The Industrial Revolution completely transformed the role of the family. In traditional, agricultural society, families worked together as a unit of production, tending to fields, knitting sweaters, or tending to the fire. Women could parent and also play a role in producing food or goods needed for the household. Work and play time were flexible and interwoven. Industrialization changed all that. The same specialization of labour that occurred in factories occurred in the lives of working-class families, and this broke up the family economy. Work and home life became sharply separated. Men earned money for their families. Women took care of the home and saw their economic role decline. While many factory workers were initially women, most of them were young women who would quit working when they married. In stark contrast to the various changing tasks that a farmer performed in pre-industrial society, factory workers typically completed repetitive and monotonous tasks for 10 to 14 hours each day. Industrial working-class families, though not working together, did serve an economic purpose of raising money to support each other. As we have seen, children often worked to earn some income for the family. In difficult circumstances, mothers struggled to make ends meet and keep the family out of the poorhouses. Jane Goode, a working-class mother, testified before the British Factory Commission in 1833. The history of her family shows the worries and stresses of a mother struggling to survive. Her life shows the unfortunately common death rate of infants. Jane Goode had twelve children, but five died before the age of two: “I have had five children that have all worked at the factory. I have only one that works there now. She gets 5 shillings 9 pence. She pays it all to me. She has worked there nine years. She has been at the drawing-head all the while. She got 2 shilling when she first went…” Betty Wardle, interviewed by the parliamentary commission on women in mines in 1842, illustrates the incredible challenges of being a mother and a worker in coal mines: Q: Have you ever worked in a coal pit? Wardle: Ay, I have worked in a pit since I was six years old. Q: Have you any children? Wardle: Yes. I have had four children; two of them were born while I worked in the pits. Q: Did you work in the pits while you were in the family way [pregnant]? Wardle: Ay, to be sure. I had a child born in the pits, and I brought it up the pit shaft in my skirt. The Emerging Middle Class Gradually, very gradually, a middle class, or “middling sort”, did emerge in industrial cities, mostly toward the end of the 19th century. Until then, there had been only two major classes in society: aristocrats born into their lives of wealth and privilege, and low-income commoners born in the working classes. However new urban industries gradually required more of what we call today “white collar” jobs, such as business people, shopkeepers, bank clerks, insurance agents, merchants, accountants, managers, doctors, lawyers, and teachers. One piece of evidence of this emerging middle class was the rise of retail shops in England that increased from 300 in 1875 to 2,600 by 1890. Another mark of distinction of the middle class was their ability to hire servants to cook and clean the house from time to time. Not surprisingly, from 1851 to 1871, the number of domestic servants increased from 900,000 to 1.4 million. This is proof of a small but rising middle class that prided themselves on taking responsibility for themselves and their families. They viewed professional success as the result of a person’s energy, perseverance, and hard work. Wealth and Income As the Industrial Revolution grew, many saw a gap forming between the “upper” and the “lower” classes. The rich were getting richer and the poor were getting poorer. E.P. Thompson argued in “The Making of the English Working Class” that life clearly did not improve for the majority of British people: “ The experience of immiseration came upon them in a hundred different forms; for the field labourer, the loss of his common rights and the vestiges of village democracy; for the artisan, the loss of his craftsman’s status; for the weaver, the loss of livelihood and of independence; for the child the loss of work and play in the home; for many groups of workers whose real earning improved, the loss of security, leisure and the deterioration of the urban environment.” Improvements in transportation Roads and canals were built and improved. The steam locomotive was invented. Railroads grew. Steam engines powered ships at sea. These improvements in transportation facilitated trade and commerce and made voyages faster and more efficient. The Trade Union Movement The formation of trade unions in the developing stages of the Industrial Revolution aided the start of reform which would eventually aid those being unfairly treated. During the 17th and 18th century, British workers commenced grouping themselves into trade unions in order to fight for their rights as workers and humans. Workers in various trades began to form groups and have strikes to protect and improve their working and living conditions. Labour unions arose because there were many who found difficulty in accepting how “big business” was run; on the backs of the workers in the factories who saw very little in compensation. Labour unions helped spread the balance of power more evenly so that labourers could bargain for more rights such as more pay, shorter work hours and better working conditions. During the 1830s labour unrest and trade union activity reached new levels. For the first time men began to organise trade associations with nationwide aims, such as Robert Owen's short-lived Grand National Consolidated Trades Union, formed in February 1834. Agricultural workers were also adopting new forms of collective action - a notable example being the Swing Riots in 1830-1. Labour leaders such as Thomas Mann, one of the chief organisers of the successful London dock strike (1889), argued that the trade union movement needed to become far more open and inclusive. 'New unionism' reached out to the many unskilled workers in Britain who lacked union representation. The first women's 'trade societies' also began to emerge during this period. The strike by the female workers at the Bryant & May match factory, in the East End of London, in July 1888 highlighted the expanding boundaries of trade union activity in Britain. In 1868 the British government supported these Unions forming the Trade Union Congress that further made Trade Unions an influence to reform. Membership in Trade Unions grew from approx. 100,000 in the 1850s to a million in 1874. The influx of trade unions forming and trade union membership gave the working class a voice in politics and helped pushed the idea of reform which bettered working conditions. Movement towards a Global Economy The Industrial Revolution completely globalized the economy. A wider range of goods were now available, and were at a reasonable price. It began to increase the economic activity around the world. Because of this, different people were able to mix with different people. As the industrial revolution spread, new world powers had emerged. They soon began competing for a share of the wealth in markets around the world. New technology (coal-steam powered engine) allowed markets to expand around the world as global trade increased. Global Migration Improvements in transportation, population growth, and social and political conditions led to a wave of global migrations (1845-1900s). Many people were struggling economically in Europe. Thus they migrated to places such as the Americas, in part, to improve their economic condition. Impacts of the industrial revolution in Germany Economic System The establishment of the German Customs Union was the focal point of Germany’s Industrial Revolution. The Zollverein (Toll Union) in 1833 abolished tolls between the various German principalities, made Germany into a common market. This paved the way for bigger and more attractive market for producers. In 1870 the modern German nation was created and thereafter major industries were founded that led to the full-fledged industrialization of Germany. Economic Hubs The Southern Ruhr area was the epicentre of the revolution as villages quickly merged into cities as new factories sprung overnight demanding a constant supply of labour. The city of Essen was probably the first industrial city in Germany as it became the home base for companies taking advantage of the Industrial Revolution. Railways Railways played an important part in Germany’s growth. Railways increased efficiency, because everything gets there faster, and the tempo of business speeds up. Germany became the centre of activity for the European business community, and Germany was able to trade better because she could now ship directly south, rather than via another country. The rail system increased the demand for steel and coal. The coalfields in Ruhr Valley were fully developed and made Germany into the foremost coal producer in Europe. A steel industry also developed and the stimulus of the coal and steel development expanded the banking and capital markets available to Germany. This helped other industries such as the chemical and electrical industries develop. The German chemical industry became the most advanced in the world. By 1880, Germany had 9,400 locomotives pulling 43,000 passengers and 30,000 tons of freight. Education Germany implemented a technical education curriculum which emphasized the technical areas of industry such as electrics, chemistry and physics. This programme produced more scientists and so more and more advances were made in these directions. This is why Germany was to become so strong in these technical fields. Population Growth The population growth in Germany increased a lot in the times of the Industrial Revolution. It went from 41 million people in 1871 to 49 million in 1891 and then increased way more in 1911, with 65.3 million people. Birth rates were highest in the urban parts of the country because many people migrated from rural areas to urban areas. Berlin was the country's largest city and the country's largest industrial centre. In 35 years the population of the city doubled from 1 million to 2 million. Government’s Role, Protection and Welfare The government played a powerful role in the industrialisation of the German Empire. The government not only supported heavy industry but also crafts and trades because it wanted to maintain prosperity in all parts of the empire. In 1879, industrial protection was introduced by applying the foreign tariffs on imports. This encouraged trade, employment and business. Social welfare was also introduced; Sickness Insurance in 1883, Accident Insurance in 1884, and Old Age Pension in 1889. Effects of the Export Boom on Latin America The most significant economic outcome of this growing integration was a rapid growth of Latin American exports to the industrializing countries, which now needed the food products, raw materials, and markets of these new nations. Latin American landowners, businessmen, and governments proved eager to supply those needs, and in the sixty years or so after 1850, an export boom increased the value of Latin American goods sold abroad by a factor of ten. Mexico continued to produce large amounts of silver, supplying more than half the world's new supply until 1860. Now added to the list of raw materials flowing out of Latin America were copper from Chile, a metal that the growing electrical industry required; tin from Bolivia, which met the mounting demand for tin cans; and nitrates from Chile and guano (bird droppings) from Peru, both of which were used for fertilizer. Wild rubber from the Amazon rain forest was in great demand for bicycle and automobile tires, as was sisal from Mexico, used to make binder twine for the proliferating mechanical harvesters of North America. Bananas from Central America, beef from Argentina, cacao from Ecuador, coffee from Brazil and Guatemala, and sugar from Cuba also found eager markets in the rapidly growing increasingly prosperous world of industrializing countries. In return for these primary products, Latin Americans imported the textiles, machinery, tools, weapons, and luxury goods of Europe. Accompanying this burgeoning commerce was large-scale investment of European capital in Latin America, $10 billion alone between 1870 and 1919. Most of this capital came from Great Britain, which invested more in Argentina in the late nineteenth century than in its colony of India. Much of this capital was used to build railroads, largely to funnel Latin American exports to the coast, where they were shipped to overseas markets. Mexico had only 390 miles of railroad in 1876; it had 15,000 miles in l910. By 1915, Argentina, with 22,000 miles of railroad, had more track per person than the United States. Becoming like Europe? To the economic elites of Latin America, intent on making their countries resemble Europe, all of this was progress. In some respects, they were surely right. Economies were growing and producing more than ever before. The population also was burgeoning; it increased from about 30 million in 1850 to more than 77 million in 1912 as public health measures (such as safe drinking water, inoculations, sewers, and campaigns to eliminate mosquitoes that carried yellow fever) brought down death rates. Urbanization also proceeded rapidly. By the early twentieth century, wrote one scholar, "Latin American cities lost their colonial cobblestones, white-plastered walls, and red-tiled roofs. They became modern metropolises, comparable to urban giants anywhere. Streetcars swayed, telephones jangled, and silent movies flickered from Montevideo and Santiago to Mexico City and Havana.'' 25 Buenos Aires, Argentina's metropolitan centre, boasted 750,000 people in 1900 and billed itself the "Paris of South America." There the educated elite, just like the English, drank tea in the afternoon, while discussing European literature, philosophy, and fashion, usually in French. To become more like Europe, Latin America sought to attract more Europeans. Because civilization, progress, and modernity apparently derived from Europe, many Latin American countries actively sought to increase their European populations by deliberately recruiting impoverished people with the promise, mostly unfulfilled, of a new and prosperous life in the New World. Argentina received the largest wave of European immigrants (some 2.5 million between 1870 and 1915), mostly from Spain and Italy. Brazil and Uruguay likewise attracted substantial numbers of European newcomers. A new but quite small segment of this vast lower class emerged among urban workers who laboured in the railroads, ports, mines, and a few factories. They organized themselves initially in a variety of mutual aid societies, but by the end of the nineteenth century, they were creating unions and engaging in strikes. To authoritarian governments interested in stability and progress, such activity was highly provocative and threatening, and they acted harshly to crush or repress unions and strikes. In 1906, the Mexican dictator Porfirio Diaz invited the Arizona Rangers to suppress a strike at Cananea near the U.S. border, an action that resulted in dozens of deaths. The following year in the Chilean city of Iquique, more than 1,000 men, women, and children were slaughtered by police when nitrate miners protested their wages and working conditions. The vast majority of the lower class lived in rural areas, where they suffered the most and benefited the least from the export boom. Government attacks on communal landholding and peasant indebtedness to wealthy landowners combined to push many farmers off their land or into remote and poor areas where they could barely make a living. Many wound up as dependent labourers or peons on the haciendas of the wealthy, where their wages were often too meagre to support a family. Thus women and children, who h.ad earlier remained at home to tend the family plot, were required to join their menfolk as field labourers. Consequences for Africa The Industrial Revolution contributed to the ‘Scramble for Africa.’ First, the Industrial Revolution created an almost insatiable demand for raw materials, including metals, timber, rubber, and many others. Africa is rich in these materials, and European nations, and the industrialists who helped influence foreign policy, clamoured for them. In the Congo, for instance, King Leopold of Belgium created his own company to profit from the harvest of rubber and other raw materials. This demand, coupled with increased nationalist pride, led nations to seek colonies in Africa in which to produce and trade goods. By 1914, the entire continent with the exception of Liberia and Abyssinia were controlled by European nations. Vast amounts of natural resources were extracted from these colonies, which aided the British industrial effort but left many of the nations bankrupt. Second, the Industrial Revolution created a demand for new, secure markets for manufactured goods. Colonisation created captive markets in places like Africa, for the abundance of goods produced. British West Indies and Americas Industrialisation intensified trade among the colonies and the metropolitan states. Large amounts of sugar, coffee, cotton and tobacco were taken from the colonies to fuel the industrial masters in Britain. The result of this parasitic relationship was massive underdevelopment and stunted economies in the colonies since all colonies were giving back to the mother country. There was also the culture of interdependence between Britain and her colonies. The colonies were by now accustomed to a ready market and therefore had to remain dependent upon the crown since their industry were tied to them.
Perioperative Fasting and Feeding in Adults, Obstetric, Paediatric and Bariatric Population-Practice Guidelines From The Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists