Está en la página 1de 13

My 360 Degree

Assessment Results
R A N DA LL S JOBS K I
S I E NA HE I G HTS UN I V ERSITY
8 / 7 /2017

Observers Lowest Observer Scores Area Identified as Strength Area to Focus on for Improvement Overall Reaction to Observer Scores Possible Reasons for Differences Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .Agenda Scores Review: The Leadership Profile (TLP) Most Comparable Scores: Self-Assessment vs.

79 47.26 Credible Leadership 63. Observers TLP Scores Category Self Observers Delta Enabling Leadership 64.38 28.26 30.46 42.93 29.79 27.32 16.31 24.56 38.65 34.86 48.33 14.15 2.31 Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .85 Culture Building Leadership 60.30 42.20 16.97 9.28 43.65 Follower Centered Leadership 57.30 19.45 Leadership Communication 52.96 36.54 Caring Leadership 57.Scores Review Randall Jobski’s Self-Assessment vs.59 Confident Leadership 64.31 Reward Equity 44.94 24.97 Capable Management 53.39 Visionary Leadership 58.

Observers’ Results Underdeveloped Manager Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .

67 Capable 53.13 61. Most Comparable Scores Randall Jobski’s Self-Assessment vs.15 50.76 43. Observers TLP Scores: Most Comparable Observers’ Group Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest Reward Equity 44.97 60.17 41.51 Management Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .97 50.46 42.28 43.

72 27.93 45.38 28. Observers TLP Scores: Lowest Observer Scores Observers’ Group Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest Leadership 52.94 51.79 27.08 Leadership Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .93 63.19 28.94 43.71 Communication Visionary 58. Lowest Observer Scores Randall Jobski’s Self-Assessment vs.

32 60. Identified Strength Randall Jobski’s Self-Assessment vs.46 Leadership Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .86 48.49 48. Observers TLP Scores: Strength Observers’ Group Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest Confident 64.32 73.

94 43.71 Communication Learn to Tell Stories Rosenbach & Sashkin (2014) .72 27. Observers TLP Scores: Improvement Observers’ Group Category Self Observers Average Lowest Highest Leadership 52. Focus for Improvement Randall Jobski’s Self-Assessment vs.79 27.94 51.

Reaction to Observer Scores Extremely Surprised Hope Scores are Skewed Focus Improvement on Lowest Observer Score ◦ Leadership Communication Want to be Recognized as Transformational Leader .

) .d.Reasons for Differences? New to MSU (1 Yr) ◦ 2 Different Leaders ◦ 2 Different Organizations ◦ 2 Different Teams to Lead MSU – Tier 1 Research University ◦ High Expectations Central Tendency Bias1 1Gross (n.

Conclusion The Leadership Profile (TLP) ◦ 360 Degree Assessment ◦ Great Insight into Current Leadership Skills ◦ Self & Observers Work on Leadership Communication ◦ Tell Stories Recent Job Change Likely Affected Outcome .

.

(n.References Gross.com. E.com/documents/TLPParticipantManual. W. The leadership profile: On becoming a better leader through leadership that matters.E. & Sashkin.d. Retrieved from https://www.leadingandfollowing. (2014). Retreived from http://www. The Likert scale explained (with examples). Fieldboom.fieldboom. M.com/blog/likert-scale/ Rosenbach.pdf .).