Construction Safety

Richard Hislop

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

1
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Successful Safety Program

Define Expectations of Performance

Establish Roles and Responsibilities
Identify Uncontrolled Hazards
Effective Work Controls
Oversight and Monitoring
Enforcement

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

2
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Work in Progress

XL Construction
Sector 20 demolition
Magnet Measurement
Facility
FFTB
Harris Construction
Sector 24 Staircase

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

3
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
4
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop
5
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Construction Safety

Project Environment, Safety & Health Plan

Contractor Selection Criteria
Safety Training
Hazards Identification and Work Planning
Field Oversight

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

6
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 LCLS Safety Plan

Modeled after SNS

ISMS Criteria
DOE Order 440.1A
Worker Protection Management
ANSI A10.33
Safety and Health Program
Requirements for Multi-
Employer Projects

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

7
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Contractor Selection Criteria

EMR Rate equal/less than 0.81

Corporate Safety Plan
Interview Key Personnel
Job Hazards Analysis & Safety Training
References from previous clients
Site visits

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

8
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Safety Training

LCLS Contractor Safety Orientation

Outline provided to SLAC ES&H Division
Examples of other project orientations
Power Point Show (Contractor Supplement)
Conventional Facilities Group Meetings
Meetings with Contractor Mgt & Safety Staff
LCLS Staff Safety Orientation (in development)

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

9
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Things are the way they are
because either:
Management wanted them to be that way.
Management tolerates them being that way.
Management did not know that things are
the way they are.
Management doesnt know any better.

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

10
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Field Oversight

Contractor Field Safety Personnel

Conventional Facilities PM/UTR
SLAC ES&H Division Oversight
SLAC Building and Area Managers
Scheduled Senior Management Walks
Stanford Site Office Oversight

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

11
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu
 Conclusion

Supportive LCLS Conventional Facilities Staff

Effective work planning and execution
Responsive subcontractors
Job Safety & Area Hazards Analysis improving
Turners staff is enthusiastic

24 - 28 October 2005 Richard Hislop

12
FAC Review hislop@slac.stanford.edu