Capital Budgeting Practices in Chinese firms Capital Budgeting Practices in Pakistan firms Capital Budgeting Practices in developing countries Historical Comparison Capital Budgeting Techniques
NON DISCOUNTING TECHNIQUES: DISCOUNTING TECHNIQUES:
1. Average Rate Return /Accounting 1) Net present value (NPV)
rate of return (ARR) 2) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 2. Pay back period (PBP) 3) Profitability Index Non Discounting Techniques
1. Average accounting return (AAR):
The AAR is a measure of accounting profit relative to book value It is an investments average net income divided by its average book value.
2. Pay back period (PBP):
The amount of time required for an investment to generate cash flows sufficient to recover its initial cost. Discounting Techniques
1. Net Present Value:
The difference between an investments market value and its cost.
2. Internal Rate of Return (IRR):
It is the discount rate that makes the estimated NPV of an investment equal to zero. 3. Profitability Index: The present value of an investments future cash flows divided by its initial cost. It is also called benefitcost ratio. Capital Budgeting Practices in Chinese firms
One of the primary goals of this study is to determine
which of the capital budgeting techniques are used by Chinese firms to evaluate capital budgets. These include the net present value, internal rate of return, modified internal rate of return, the profitability index, payback and the accounting rate of return. Almost 89 % of the firms indicated NPV was their primary method. This was followed by approximately 67 % for the accounting rate of return, 46 % for the profitability index, and 41 % for IRR . surveys find that approximately 83 % of firms used payback as the secondary technique. Capital Budgeting Practices in Pakistan firms The information was collected through a questionnaire from sample companies listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE). The study shows that bigger size companies give greater preference to IRR, while smaller firms rely more on NPV. Also smaller firms are keener in estimating the pay back period (PP) as compared to larger companies. Consciously or unconsciously the firms relying more on debt financing or with high growth rates give more preference to the NPV technique, while low leverage and low growth firms rely more on IRR. Capital Budgeting Practices in developed countries As, the capital budgeting practices are the investment decision taken for increasing shareholders value. Many studies have been conducted about capital budgeting practices in U.S. and Europe. Chadwell-Hatfield et al.(1997) conducted a survey among 118 manufacturing firms in the U.S. Results showed that NPV (84%) and IRR (70%) were preferred primary methods. However, it was clearly observed that two thirds of firms relied on shorter PB periods rather IRR or NPV. Results were found that NPV was most popular technique, followed by IRR Notwithstanding, researchers connotes that small business owners seemed to be increasingly using DCF as the primary method for evaluating. Cont..
In a seminal study of Brounen et al. (2004), four European countries
viz., U.K., France, Germany and the Netherlands consisting of 313 companies during 2002 and 2003 were examined. Their result showed that 47% and 67% of the UK companies were used NPV and PB respectively as a primary tool for evaluating capital budgeting decision whereas companies in Netherlands were used 70% of NPV and 65% of PB methods. However, companies in France and Germany reported lower usages of both methods (42% for NPV, 50 % for PB and 44% for NPV, 51 % for PB respectively). Many researches recognized that DCF is the dominant in capital budgeting evaluation methods in the UK,the USA and in Canada1999 NPV, IRR and PB are the most popular methods among North American and Western European companies. Cont..
In a survey of capital budgeting practices of Australian
listed companies, Truong et al., 2008 found that NPV, IRR and PB were the most popular capital budgeting evaluation methods. Shinoda (2010) carried out a survey of capital budgeting in Japan. Questionnaire has been administered to collect data from a sample of 225 companies listed on Tokyo Stock Exchange. Results showed that firms were using combination of PB and NPV for evaluating capital investment projects. Capital Budgeting Practices in developing countries In most of the developing countries, PB method was the dominant methods in evaluating capital investment. Kester et al.(1999) surveyed a total of 226 companies across six countries: Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Singapore. Results showed that PB is still important method and the DCF methods have become increasingly important. In five Asian countries, 95% of firms used PB method and 88% of them use NPV in evaluating projects. However, both methods were treated as equally important. Cont..
(1996) studied Indian industries capital budgeting
practices and the findings showed that 90% of the companies were using capital budgeting methods. Of them 75% of companies reported that they were adopting DCF methods in evaluating capital budgeting, among them IRR was most popular. In the Dutch firms, 89% of CFOs reported that they used NPV methods however, 2% of CFOs stated that they used the ARR which is the least popular method. Chinese CFOs stated that they more likely to use NPV and PB methods (89% and 84% respectively) in evaluating capital budgeting projects. Actual Capital Budgeting Practices Capital Budgeting Techniques in Practice