Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Mapping Mortality
Session 1:
Introduction rhetoric and rituals
Introduction to the Module
Module Handbook
On being paperless
Weekly sessions
Suggested books
2 Questions:
Which approaches/ answers do you think are most insightful
or useful or appealing? Why?
Which approaches/ answers do you find least satisfactory?
Why?
More detail:
Questions:
What do you think of Baumann?
What critique would you suggest?
What do you think of Bloch?
What critique would you suggest?
Compare/ contrast Baumann & Bloch:
Do they conflict: which side is stronger?
Can they complement each other: how?
Phillipe Aries (1914-1984)
Tame Death
Early church to early medieval
Death of the Self From google images
High Medieval
Remote Death
C 16th to C 18th
Death of the Other
Victorian
Death Denied
C 20th
Tame Death
Attitudes to death
Death = near and constant
Familiar
Public
Focus on community
No surprise, calmly accepted
Non-threatening opposite of wild force http://www.biblepl
aces.com/thessalon
Burial and bodies ica.htm
Tame Death
Death near and constant; Divine Will; Public; Church
Death of the Self
Uncontrollable; focus on self; reminders; direct eschatology
Remote Death
Control (sex and death); medicalize/ classify; natural; remove from
society
Death of the Other
Romanticize; reunite with beloved; markers on graves; afterlife
Death Denied
Privatized; vanished; dirty/ indecent; failure; mourning denied
David Chidester (1952-)
3 deaths:
Biological death
Psychological death
Sociological death
4 transcendences:
Ancestral transcendence
Experiential transcendence
Cultural transcendence
Mythic transcendence
Biological death
Questions:
What do you think of Aries?
What critique would you suggest?
What do you think of Chidester?
What critique would you suggest?
Compare/ contrast Baumann & Bloch:
Which approach is more useful: history or typology?
Can they complement each other: how?
Is it useful to compare these two? Like with like or unlike
with unlike?
Some common themes
Hope
Transcendence
Life over death:
Modern culture
Deconstruct mortality
Dissolve issue into endless battle with diseases
Become healthcare issues
Post-modern culture
Deconstruct immortality
Substitute notoriety for historical memory; disappearance of
death; life = unstoppable now, endless series of oppositions
of transience vs. durable
Post-modern Readings
Nomads pilgrims
Continual recreation of self; collage
Immortality democratized
Politics, pop songs, Olympics = equal weight
Equality of opportunity
Hide death by crossing bridges
Everything is reversible everyone may reappear
Death is simply suspension
Death hidden by fact of recycling last years goods
this years antiques; retro; fallen stars and nostalgia
Different theories?
Davies: emphasize rites as hope
Necessary for humanity
To be human is to hope, to go beyond
We can overcome terror of extinction
Baumann: emphasize rites as hiding
Necessary for humanity
Everything is hiding, too awful
Must always be lying to ourselves
Question: Do they
make sense of contemporary patterns of death and dying?
contribute anything to understanding death?