FDP Final Presentation

Ocean Field
Development Project
PRESENTED BY
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Presentation Overview
Company Background Info

Project Background Info
Project Team and Time Line
Departments Presentations
02 DISEMBER 2010
CONSTRUCTING EXCELLENT
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Global Top Corporation

The acronym for Global Top Corporation
Formed 2 years ago
The corporate is engaged in a broad spectrum of
activities, ranging from upstream exploration and
production of oil and gas to downstream oil refining.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Milestone
Vision
Champion for continuous improvement and development in oil
and gas industry.
Mission
To generate consistently profitable returns from investments in core

business activities by:
Providing direction, financial resources and management support for
each operating unit;
Through establishing a major market presence for each activity;
Through dynamic and innovative management, teamwork and a
commitment to excellence.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Line of Global Top Corporation
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Project Background
Ocean Field
Exploration well: 4
Type of field: Oil and gas
well
Classification
T1
Exploration
Latitude
Longitude
Discovery
2006
1.5, 4.2
T2
Exploration
2006
2.5, 3.6
T3
Appraisal
2007
2.0, 1.0
T4
Appraisal
2007
1.8, 5.8
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Global Top Oil Field
90
KM
Project Timeline
For Field Development Project 2 years

Development 4 years
Production 20 years
GEOLOGY &
PETROPHYSICS
MOHD FAZLI BIN ISMAIL
Consulting Team Ocean Field
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Outline
Structure maps
Bulk volume
Pressure gradient
Log interpretation
Lithology correlation
Cross section
Rock properties
Hydrocarbon in place
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Structure Map
Top B1
02 DISEMBER 2010
Bottom B1
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Top B2
02 DISEMBER 2010
Bottom B2
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Buck Volume
Layer
Bulk Volume
(Acres -ft)
B1
237,500
B2
50,000
Total
287,500
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Pressure gradient
5500
11800
5550
5600
B1
5650
5700
5750
5800
11900
12000
12100
depth
12200
Pressur
e
gradien
t = 0.46
Pressure
gradient =
0.38
WELL01
WELL02
WELL03
WELL04
12300
12400
Oil water
contact =
12280 ft
12500
12600
pressure
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Pressure gradient
5620
12000
5640
5660
B2
5680
5700
5720
5740
5760
5780
12100
Pressure
gradient =
0.37
12200
depth
12300
12400
Pressur
e
gradien
t = 0.46
well 1
well 2
well 3
well 4
Oil water
contact =
12320 ft
12500
12600
pressure
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Log Interpretation
-50 0
12040
50 100 150 200 250
12060
SP
GR
0 200 400 600 800

0
200 400 600 800
12040
12040
12060
12060
12080
12080
12080
12100
12100
12100
12120
12120
12120
12140
12140
12140
12160
12160
12160
12180
12180
12180
12200
12200
12200
12220
12220
12220
02 DISEMBER 2010
Well 1
RT
RT
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Log Interpretation
-50 0
12120
50 100 150 200 250
12140
200 400 600 800
12120
SP
GR
12140
12160
12160
12180
12180
12200
12200
12220
12220
12240
12240
12260
12260
12280
12280
12300
12300
02 DISEMBER 2010
Well 2
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Log Interpretation
-100
0
12190
100
12210
200
300
100
200
300
400
12190
SP
GR
12210
12230
12230
12250
12250
12270
12270
12290
12290
12310
12310
12330
12330
12350
12350
02 DISEMBER 2010
Well 3
RT
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Log Interpretation
-100 -50
0
12300
50
100 150
12320
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
12300
SP
12320
12340
12340
12360
12360
12380
12380
12400
12400
12420
12420
12440
12440
12460
12460
02 DISEMBER 2010
Well 4
RT
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Lithology correlation
12070
12150
12220
12330
12200
Well 1
Well 2
12290
Well 3
Well 4
12350
12460
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Wells Correlation
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Cross Section
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Rock properties
Porosity
Water Saturation
Permeability
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Average Porosity B1 =
0.26
02 DISEMBER 2010
Average Porosity B2 =
0.25
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Average Sw B1 = 0.25
02 DISEMBER 2010
Average Sw B2 = 0.22
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Porosity vs Permeability
0.4
0.3
Porosity
0.2
0.1
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Permeability, mD
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Layers
Average
Porosity
Average
Permeability
(mD)
B1
0.26
460
B2
0.25
420
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
02 DISEMBER 2010
B1
Percentiles
Forecast
Values
P90
273
P50
438
P10
613
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
02 DISEMBER 2010
B2
Percentiles
Forecast
Values
P90
92
P50
111
P10
127
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
02 DISEMBER 2010
Total
Percentiles
Forecast
Values
P90
382
P50
551
P10
726
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
RESERVOIR
AZAD ANUGERAH BIN ALI RASOL
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Outline
Reservoir Rock Properties

Fluid Properties
Fluid Composition
Gas Properties
Reservoir Classification
Drainage Plan
Development Planning
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Reservoir Rock Properties

Properties
B1
B2
Depth (ft)
19020
12171
Lithology
Sandstone
Sandstone
Average Permeability
(md)
460
420
Thickness (ft)
70
20
Average Porosity
0.26
0.25
BHT (F)
198
200
Saturation
0.25
0.22
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Fluid Properties
02 DISEMBER 2010
B1
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Fluid Properties
02 DISEMBER 2010
B2
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Fluid Properties
summary
Properties
B1
B2
Pi (Psia)
5660
5690
Pb (Psia)
1542
2825
GOR (SCF/STB)
298
1080
Oil Gravity (API)
41
38
Gas Gravity
0.73
0.71
Viscosity (cp)
0.48
0.44
Boi (BBL/STB)
1.16
1.38
Oil Compressibility
(1/Psi)
5.85 x 10E-6
9.75 x E-6
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Fluid Compositions
60
50
40
B1
B2
30
20
10
0
H2S CO2 N2
02 DISEMBER 2010
C1
C2
C3 i-C4 n-C4 i-C5 n-C5 C4
C5
C6 C7+
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Gas Properties
Properties
B1
B2
Gas Compressibility
Factor, z
0.97
0.96
Specific Gravity, g
0.73
0.71
Gas Viscosity, g (cp)
0.056
0.025
Gas Compressibility,
Cg(psia-1)
0.000287
0.000244
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Reservoir Classification
Under saturated oil reservoir.
Types of oil
Drive mechanism
Primary drive solution gas drive
Secondary drive water drive
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Drainage Plan
Case 1
02 DISEMBER 2010
Drainage
radius(ft)
No. of
wells
1200
14
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Case 2
02 DISEMBER 2010
Drainage
radius(ft)
No. of
wells
1500
11
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Case 3
02 DISEMBER 2010
Drainage
radius(ft)
No. of
wells
1800
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Development Planning
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
RESERVOIR SIMULATION
AZAD ANUGERAH BIN ALI RASOL
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Outline
Objectives
Work Flow
Model Construction
Reservoir Development Plans
Simulation Results
Oil in Place Validation
Sensitivity Analysis
Conclusion
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Objectives
Determine the amount of recoverable reserves.

Optimum number & location of wells.
Future performance of the field.
Reservoir management policies.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Work Flow
Fluid
Properties
Geological
Study
Geologic
Model
Petrophysical
Study
Static Fluid
Model
Validat
ed
Economists
02 DISEMBER 2010
Dynamic
Model
Reservoir Rock
Properties
Simulation
Results
Drilling &
Completion
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Continue
Grid
Determination
Contour Map
Dynamic Model
02 DISEMBER 2010
Static Model
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Plan & Cross Sectional View

B1
B2
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Model Construction
Static Model
Reservoir rock properties
Reservoir PVT data
Dynamic Model
Number and location of wells are modeled based
drainage area plan
*Strategy is to obtain higher well coverage
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Development Plans
02 DISEMBER 2010
Plan A
Characteristics
Data
Number of wells
14
Drainage radius (ft)
1200
Q (STB/d) per well
4000
Characteristics
Data
Plateau Period
4.5 years
STOIIP (MM STB)
647
R.F. (%)
35.6
EUR (MM STB)
230
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Development Plans
02 DISEMBER 2010
Plan B
Characteristics
Data
Number of wells
11
1500
Q (STB/d) per well
4000
Characteristics
Data
Plateau Period
5.5 years
STOIIP (MM STB)
647
R.F. (%)
36.2
EUR (MM STB)
234
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Development Plans
02 DISEMBER 2010
Plan C
Characteristics
Data
Number of wells
1800
Q (STB/d) per well
4000
Characteristics
Data
Plateau Period
5 years
STOIIP (MM STB)
647
R.F. (%)
32.3
EUR (MM STB)
167
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Secondary Development
PLANS
RESULT
Plan A + 2 water injection

wells
RF = 36.7 %
EUR = 270 MM STB
Plan B + 2 water injection

wells
RF = 37.5 %
EUR = 243 MM STB
Plan C + 2 water injection

wells
RF = 33.8 %
EUR = 175 MM STB
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Sensitivity Analysis
Plans
Data
Plan A
RF =
EUR =
Plateau Period =
Plan B
RF =
EUR =
Plateau Period =
Plan C
RF =
EUR =
Plateau Period =
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Conclusion
STOIIP value from simulation matches the values from
reservoir calculations with a total deviation of 2.8%.
Plan B has the most favorable plateau period, RF, and total
production compared to Plan B and C.
The three plans analyzed will be discussed with production,
drilling and completion before submitted to the economist for
further evaluation.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
DRILLING
KIRETH KAUR A/P GURBACHAN SINGH
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Outline
Objective
Pressure and Fracture Gradient Determination
Casing Setting Depth & Hole Geometry
Bit Planning & Casing Design
Drilling Fluids & BOP Selection
Cementing planning
Well Schematic Diagram
Drill Time Estimation
Drill Cost Estimation
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Objective
Overall drilling operations proceed with

maximum production and minimize cost.
Implementation of latest technology and

finest method of drilling in oil and gas
industry.
Always let safety to be the highest priority in

any kind of activities.
To ensure the environmental aspects in
drilling operations are not left behind.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION

mud
over
pressu
pore
mud
bur
re
pore
Pore pressure mud
mud
pressure
den
mud gradie
pressur pressure gradient press pressure gradient poisso stre fracture fracture pres nt
depth
e
gradient (ppg)
ure gradient
(ppg) n ratio ss gradient pressure sure (ppg)
0.4626065 8.8962804 5820.6 0.4790674 9.2128363
84
69
7
9
41
0.48
0.4624934 8.8941042 5823.9 0.4789407 9.2103997
12160 5623.92
21
51
2
89
98
0.48
0.4623738 8.8918051 5827.0 0.4788077 9.2078408
12170 5627.09
7
96
9
24
44
0.48
0.4623077 8.8905337 5833.2 0.4787213 9.2061803
12185 5633.22
55
58
2
79
6
0.48
0.4621426 8.8873592 5835.8 0.4785428 9.2027470
12195 5635.83
81
58
3
45
27
0.48
0.4620942 8.8864273 5839.8 0.4784809 9.2015567
12205 5639.86
24
78
6
5
39
0.48
0.4621358 8.8872288 5844.9 0.4785092 9.2021001
12215 5644.99
98
17
9
1
92
0.48
0.4620777
0.4784376 9.2007236
12225 5648.9
1
8.8861098 5848.9
28
12
0.48
0.4620147 8.8848983 5852.7 0.4783612 9.1992549
12235 5652.75
12
06
5
59
75
0.48
0.4619020 8.8827307 5855.9 0.4782351 9.1968307
12245 5655.99
01
85
9
98
32
0.48
0.4618563 8.8818524 5857.7 0.4781828 9.1958241
12250 5657.74
27
33
4
57
76
0.48
0.4617837 8.8804569 5859.1 0.4781036 9.1943005
12255 5659.16
62
56
6
31
99
0.48
02 DISEMBER
2010
CONSTRUCTING
EXCELLENT
0.4616933 8.8787175 5860.3 0.4780065 9.1924331
12260 5660.36
12
3
6
25
79
0.48
12150 5620.67
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.8208688
61
0.8208311
4
0.8207912
9
0.8207692
52
0.8207142
27
0.8206980
75
0.8207119
66
0.8206925
7
0.8206715
71
9973.5566
67
9981.3066
67
5875
.74
5880
.576
5885
9989.03 .412
10001.073 5892
33
.666
5897
10008.61 .502
5902
10016.62 .338
10024.996 5907
67
.174
10032.966 5912
67
.01
10040.916 5916
67
.846
10048.663 5921
0.820634
33
.682
0.8206187
5924
76
10052.58
.1
0.8205945 10056.386 5926
87 GLOBAL
67 TOP
.518
0.8205644
5928
CORPORATION
37
10060.12 .936
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3

Depth 0
(ft) 0
Pressure
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(1000psi)
Casing
2000
Depth (ft)
Conductor
0-500
Surface
500-4000
Intermediat
e
4000-10000
Production
10000
12040
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
pore
pressure
gradient
mud
pressure
gradient
14000
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Well Planning
There are 11 wells
named Z1 until Z11.
Z1 are vertical well
while Z2 until Z11 are
J-Shape deviated
wells.
This well were
determined from 5
spots area given by
the Reservoir
Simulation
Department.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Bit and Casing Design
TRIONE
BIT
02 DISEMBER 2010
PDC
BIT
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Bit and Casing Design
TRIONE
BIT
PDC
BIT
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
BOP Selection
Bottom Hole Depth
= 12 190 ft
Expected Bottom Hole pressure (BHP)
= 8.93 ppg
Gas gradient
= 0.1 psi/ft
Max anticipated formation pressure
Gas hydrostatic pressure
Pressure imposed on the preventer
=
=
5660.54 psi
1219 psi
=
6879.54 psi
BOP Design must be able to withstand 6879.54 psi of pressure
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Drilling Fluid
Mud system = sea water mud
Additives
Sacks
Barite
1634.44
Xantham Gum Polymer
22.11
KCL
663.29
Flo-Tro
66.33
NaOH
5.53
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Cementing Planning
The cement fill all annular space between
the casing and formation
Conductor Casing
20"
Hole: 26"
The cement fill the annular space betwee
the casing and hole to at least 500ft abov

the previous casing shoe
Surface Casing
13 3/8"
Hole: 17.5" Intermediate Casing
12.25"
Hole: 9 5/8"
Production casing
7
Hole: 8.5"
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Cementing Planning
Casing
Type of cement
Cementing
required
(sacks)
Conductor
5,116
Surface
9,354
Intermediate
28,434
Production
3,941
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Drill Time Estimation

Drilling Schedule For 1 Well
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000
4000
6000
Depth
(ft)
8000
10000
12000
14000
Cumulative Day
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
40
Drill Cost Estimation

Plan Wells
s
Cost (USD)
14
490 Million
11
385 Million
315 Million
Best Plan = Plan 2
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
WELL COMPLETION
MOHAMAD SYAZWAN B PADZIR
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Outline
Objectives
Type of Completion
Tubing Selection
Packer Selection
Subsurface Equipments Selection
Perforation Technique
Wellhead Design
Completion Fluid
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Objectives
To determine subsurface completion equipment and
accessories and the setting depth for all equipments.
To do the tubing and packer design.
To determine the perforation technique.
To do the wellhead design.
To determine the surface safety equipment.
To select the completion fluid.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Type of Completion
Type of well
No of well
Vertical
Directional
10
Dual Completion
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Tubing Selection
Tubing Grade N80 13Cr
Tubing Size :
- Dual string 3 OD
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Tubing Specification
Specifications
Details
Grade
N80 Chrome coated
OD (in)
3.500
ID (in)
2.750
Connection
API Non-upset
Nominal
Weight
(lbm/ft)
Wall Thickness (in)
12.7
Steel Cross Section (sq

in.)
7.461
0.750
Packer Selection
9 Dual Retrievable Packer
For production, injection and
zonal isolation.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Subsurface Equipment Selection

CAMX Landing Nipple
CAMXN Bottom No-Go Landing Nipple
CS-1-Series Sliding Sleeve
Flow Couplings
Blast Joint
Pup Joints
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Wellhead Selection
Cameron S wellhead
System
02 DISEMBER 2010
Less space in platform

Minimize cost-reduce
installation time
Can be used for dual
completion
Meet pressure
requirement 2000 psi to
15,000 psi.
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Perforation Type
Perforation Technique TCP
Gun Type
Power Jet
Omega
Gun Size (in)
3.18
Type/Weight (g)
HMX 3106 / 20
Shot Density (spf)
Phasing
60
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Completion Fluid
Fluid type
Fluid
Composition
Completion
Seawater +
KCl
9.6 ppg + 25% KCl +

CaCl20.3% acid acetic
Packer
Seawater +
KCl
Seawater
9.6 ppg + 25 KCl
Perforation
02 DISEMBER 2010
9.6 ppg
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
PRODUCTION
DEPARTMENT
MOHD FAKRUMIE BIN ZAIDIN
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
SUBSURFACE PRODUCTION
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Field Overview
Combination of IPR Curve, VLP Curve and
Choke Performance Curve
Choke and Tubing Selection
Gas Lift Design
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Introduction
Objectives
To predict and evaluate the deliverability of
OCEAN Field.
To analyze fluid flow from:
Reservoir to bottom-hole
Bottom-hole to surface
Wellhead to separator
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Field Overview
Located Oil Refinery. approximately 92 km from
Lutong
Water depth is about 70 80 meter in area of
field.
Nearby Field Bokor field (60 km from field)
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Combination of IPR, VLP & Choke Performance Curve

1) Layer B1
Combination of IPR Curve, VLP Curve and Choke Performance Curve for
S=52
02 DISEMBER 2010
S=64
S=48
IPR
THP Tubing 2.375 in
THP Tubing 2.875 in
Layer B1
THP Tubing 3.5 in
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Combination of IPR, VLP & Choke Performance Curve

2) Layer B2
Combination of IPR Curve, VLP Curve and Choke Performance Curve for Layer B2
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0
2000
4000
S=52
02 DISEMBER 2010
6000
S=64
8000
10000
S=48
IPR
12000
14000
THP Tubing 2.375 in
16000
18000
20000
THP Tubing 2.875 in
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Choke Size Selection

Layer
Choke Size
(in)
Q
(bpd)
B1
48
33000
B2
48
14200
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Tubing Selection
Layer
Tubing Size
(in)
Tubing
Head
Pressure,
THP (psi)
Q
(bpd)
B1
3.50
450
4000
B2
3.50
700
2250
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Gas Lift Design

Further plan - maintaining & increasing the
production rates since the availability of
gas in OCEAN field.
Design:
install gas lift valves as a tubing is place.
continuous flow gas lift.
SURFACE PRODUCTION
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Presentation Outline
Introduction
OCEAN Platform
Surface Facilities
Process Overview
Process Diagram
Water Injection Process
Crude Oil and Gas Transportation
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Introduction
Objectives
to design the process, production facilities
and platform arrangement in the safety and
cost effective manner.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
OCEAN Platform
Type: 8 legs fixed platform
Maximum man power: 80 - 100 persons
Consist of 2 levels:
Upper deck : accommodation, drilling and power
generator module
Lower deck : wellhead module and initial production
process module
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Consideration:
Water depth 250 ft
Soil characteristics.
Load of on board and heavy equipments.
Economical in cost.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Platform Design
Helipad
Crane
Head quarter
Escape
capsule
Derrick
Communication
mast
Production
facilities
Drilling
equipment
Separato
r
Platform side view
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Platform Design
Life boat
Life boat
Control
room
Cabin/ storage
Crane
Helipad
Life boat
Draw
work
Production
facilities
Production
laboratory
Derric
k
Water/
fuel
tank
Drilling
equipments
Platform upper deck plan view
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Platform Design
Life boat
Life boat
Power
generator
system
Equipment
maintenance
area
Mud circulating
system
Storage for
gas lift
Water
treatment
Separato
r
Floatatio
n cell
Compresso
r
Life boat
Well slots
Utilitie
s
Platform lower deck plan view

02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Surface Facilities
1) Separator
) Type: Vertical separator
) Phases: Three phase of separator
) Considerations:
Easy for installation

More efficient
Low in cost
Small size of spacing required
Sand production
Easy to clean up
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Vertical Separator
2) Compressor
) Type: Reciprocating
) Function: Compress for transportation and gas lift
purpose (future plan).
) Advantages:
Capacity is easily controlled.

Efficiently compress large or small volumes of gas through high or
low pressure ratio.
High flow efficiency.
High capability.
Low in cost.
Vary in size.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Process Overview
SEPARATION
Ga
s
Dehydration
or treating
WELLS
Crude
Oil
Oil treating
RESERVOIR
Wate
r
Water Treating
Flare
Sales
Injection
Gas Lift
Fuel
Storage/Export
Disposal
Water Injection
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION
Process Diagram
1) Crude Oil
Crude
Oil
From
Well
Productio
Productio
n
n
Separato
Separato
rr
Associate
Associate
d
d Gas
Gas
MOL
MOL
Pump
Pump
Meterin
Meterin
g
g
MCOT
MCOT
Produce
Produce
d
d Water
Water
Full Well Stream (FWS) from platform undergoes 3-stage

separation process at production separator. The separated
output will be crude oil, associated gas and produced water.
Crude oil output will be pumped through the Main Oil Line (MOL)
pump to the custody meters to Miri Crude Oil Terminal (MCOT).
Process Diagram
2) Gas
MGAST
Platform has gas compression facilities which compresses

associated gas (AG) for sales. AG goes into the stage compression.
After compression, the gas is metered and then sent to Miri Gas
Terminal (MGAST).
Process Diagram
3) Water
Closed
Drain
Vessel
Hydrocyclone
Produced
Water
Caisson
Degasser /
Skimmer
Vessel
Water from oil production separator will go to

hydrocyclone and then to the degasser/skimmer vessel.
the
The reject oil from hydrocyclone and skimmer will go to the

Closed Drain Vessel (CDV) whereas the water will go to the
caisson.
Water Injection Process

Water
Injection
Feed
Pump
Seawater /
Cooling
Water
Exchanger
s
Seawater
Caisson &
Lift Pump
Water
Injection
Fine Filter
Injection
Water
Deaerator
Water
Injection
Water
Injection
Coarse
Filter
Water
Injection
Pump
Water is taken up from the sea by the Sea Water Lift Pump. It is then
pumped by the Water Injection Feed pumps through the coarse and fine
filters.
After that, the deaerator will lower down the oxygen content of the water.
Water injection pumps are then used to pump the water into the
reservoirs

Crude oil and gas production - delivered from
OCEAN Platform to Bokor Platform via construct
pipelines.
From Bokor Platform - crude oil and gas
production are delivered via existing pipelines to
Lutong Oil Refinery for processing.
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION

Bokor
Platfor
m
OCEAN
field
40
km
60
km
Lutong Oil
Refinery
92
km
113 10 12E 4
17 24
Crude oil
Gas
pipelines
pipelines
02 DISEMBER 2010
GLOBAL TOP
CORPORATION

FDP Final Presentation

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

FDP Final Presentation

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Ocean Field

Company Background Info

Global Top Corporation

To generate consistently profitable returns from investments in core

Line of Global Top Corporation

Global Top Oil Field

For Field Development Project 2 years

50 100 150 200 250

0 200 400 600 800

50 100 150 200 250

200 400 600 800

Reservoir Rock Properties

Reservoir Rock Properties

Oil Gravity (API)

C3 i-C4 n-C4 i-C5 n-C5 C4

Gas Viscosity, g (cp)

Determine the amount of recoverable reserves.

Plan & Cross Sectional View

Drainage radius (ft)

Q (STB/d) per well

STOIIP (MM STB)

EUR (MM STB)

Drainage radius (ft)

Q (STB/d) per well

STOIIP (MM STB)

EUR (MM STB)

Drainage radius (ft)

Q (STB/d) per well

STOIIP (MM STB)

EUR (MM STB)

Plan A + 2 water injection

Plan B + 2 water injection

Plan C + 2 water injection

Overall drilling operations proceed with

Implementation of latest technology and

Always let safety to be the highest priority in

Pressure and Fracture Gradient Determination

Pressure and Fracture Gradient Determination

Bit and Casing Design

Bit and Casing Design

BOP Design must be able to withstand 6879.54 psi of pressure

Xantham Gum Polymer

the casing and hole to at least 500ft abov

Drill Time Estimation

Drill Cost Estimation

Best Plan = Plan 2

N80 Chrome coated

Steel Cross Section (sq

Subsurface Equipment Selection

Less space in platform

Gun Size (in)

Shot Density (spf)

9.6 ppg + 25% KCl +

9.6 ppg + 25 KCl

Combination of IPR, VLP & Choke Performance Curve

THP Tubing 2.375 in

THP Tubing 2.875 in

THP Tubing 3.5 in

Combination of IPR, VLP & Choke Performance Curve

THP Tubing 2.375 in

THP Tubing 2.875 in

Choke Size Selection

Gas Lift Design