Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Operational Direction
By
Michael R. Wood
www.gantthead.com SME
Topics to be Presented
Conditioning the Organization for Change
Discovering Enterprise Requirements
Developing Operationally-Actionable Objectives
Developing Focused Urgency, Momentum and Commitment
Viewing the Organization as a Series of Value-added
Delivery Systems
Driving Alignment Throughout the Enterprise
Models and Techniques that Drive the Process
Dec 4, 2016
Strategic Objectives
into
Operational Reality
Dec 4, 2016
Dec 4, 2016
Context
Collaboration
Concentration
Dec 4, 2016
Creating Context
Dec 4, 2016
Collaboration
Collaboration Fosters Buy-in
Dec 4, 2016
Concentration
Concentration = Undistracted Focus
Through undistracted focus, things get done!
Dec 4, 2016
Dec 4, 2016
10
Dec 4, 2016
11
Dec 4, 2016
12
Dec 4, 2016
13
Dec 4, 2016
14
Therefore:
Dec 4, 2016
15
Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives
Operationally-Actionable Objectives
describe clear and quantifiable
outcomes.
Dec 4, 2016
16
Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives
Typical Objective
Actionable Objective
To provide top
To provide top quality
quality service to our
service to our
customers
customers by:
No Measures
Keeping defective
returns below 10 per day
Dec 4, 2016
17
Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives
Typical Objective
To improve our product
mix to more closely align
with emerging market
demand
Dec 4, 2016
Actionable Objective
To respond to our
customers desire for cars
that get 30 M.P.G. by
developing a line of midsized cars that meet or
exceed their expectation
by the year 2010
18
Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives
Dec 4, 2016
19
Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives - 8 Point Test
What operational area does
the objective relate to?
Dec 4, 2016
20
Dec 4, 2016
21
Dec 4, 2016
22
Dec 4, 2016
23
COLLECTING
Sales &
Marketing
Finance
Accts
Rec.
BUYING
Dec 4, 2016
Wharehouse
Accounting
SHIPPING
PAYING
Advertising
Accts
Pay.
TV
Shipping
Receiving
Sales
Print
Order
Process
Direct
Mktg
24
Dec 4, 2016
Identify VADS
that are affected
by the objective
Identify the
process groups that
participate in the
VADS affected
25
Dec 4, 2016
26
Strategic Direction
Business Objectives
Process Sequence
VADS Object
Transformation
Value Added
Dec 4, 2016
27
28
Dec 4, 2016
29
Preliminary Goal
Dec 4, 2016
30
Dec 4, 2016
31
Models and Techniques that Drive the Process - Level 1 Workflow Model
L e v e l 1 W o r k flo w
V A D S N a m e : S a le s O r d e r s o n A c c o u n t
R e fe re n c e : W F L 1 -S O A
M odel
- C u s t o m e r C a lls in O r d e r
S te p s
C u s to m e r
S a le s O r d e r D e s k
S a le s O r d e r
S y s te m
B illin g
11
C u s t o m e r c a lls a n o r d e r in t o t h e
S a le s O r d e r D e s k .
2.
S a le s O r d e r D e s k e n te r s th e o r d e r
in t o th e S a le s O r d e r S y s t e m .
3.
S a le s O r d e r S y s te m p r in ts a
R o u g h O r d e r a t t h e S a le s O r d e r
D esk.
4.
S a le s O r d e r D e s k fo r w a r d s th e
R o u g h O r d e r t o t h e C r e d it
D e p a r t m e n t f o r a p p r o v a l.
5.
C r e d it D e p a r t m e n t r e v ie w s
C u s t o m e r 's C r e d it s t a t u s in t h e
S a le s O r d e r S y s te m a n d a p p r o v e s
th e o rd e r
6.
C r e d it D e p a r t m e n t f o r w a r d s t h e
A p p ro v e d O r d e r to th e
W a re h o u s e .
7.
W a r e h o u s e s h ip s t h e o r d e r a n d
f o r w a r d s t h e o r d e r t o B illin g .
8.
B illin g f in a liz e s t h e S h ip p e d O r d e r
in S a le s O r d e r S y s t e m a n d p r in t s
in v o ic e .
9.
B illin g m a ils I n v o ic e t o C u s t o m e r .
5
C o p y o f I n v o ic e
to P ro d u c t
A n a ly s is G r o u p
- Shipped Order -
10
1.
10.
C u s t o m e r r e m it s p a y m e n t t o
B illin g .
11.
B illin g p o s t s C u s t o m e r 's p a y m e n t
in S a le s O r d e r S y s t e m .
6
W a re h o u s e
Dec 4, 2016
- A p p ro v e d O rd e r -
C r e d it D e p a r tm e n t
32
Dec 4, 2016
33
B eg. S tatus
Models and Techniques that Drive the Process Level 2 Workflow Model
Phase A
Phase B
Phase C
Phase D
printer.
P
R
O
C
E
D
billing.
2 Warehouse picks order and
updates quantities picked on
the order form.
PG3
PO2
E ffort
Lapsed E nd
Tim e S tatus
PG1
5 minutes
5 minutes
Dec 4, 2016
PO1
PO1
1 hour
Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008
2 hours
45 days
10 minutes
10 minutes
34
Dec 4, 2016
35
VADS Phase
Shipped sales
order ready for
billing
Customer
Shipped sales
order ready for
billing
Inventory
Customer
Rule
Impact of Failure
Safeguard
Billed sales
order pending
collection
Dec 4, 2016
36
Goal
A. No inventory
available
No shortfalls
B. Slow
.collections
Average
38 days
Isolating
Isolatingproblems
problemsalong
along
flow
flowline,
line,helps
helpspeople
people
visualize
visualizewhere
whereproblems
problems
occur
occurand
andget
getleverage
leverage
on
change.
on change.
Dec 4, 2016
Existing WFL2
Beg
Status
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
End
Status
Customer wants
product
Open Order
Shipped Order
Shipped Order
Billed Order
Paid Order
37
Goal
A. No inventory
available
No shortfalls
B. Slow
collections
Average
38 days
Mapping
Mappinggoals
goalsto
tothe
the
proposed
workflow
proposed workflowhelps
helps
people
visualize
new
people visualize new
procedures
procedures and
andunderstand
understand
operational
impact.
operational impact.
Proposed WFL2
Beg
Status
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
End
Status
Customer wants
product
Open Order
Shipped Order
Billed Order
Shipped Order
Billed Order
Paid Order
Change
ChangePoints
Points are
are
Identified
Identified
Dec 4, 2016
38
Dec 4, 2016
Warehouse
Stimulus Trigger
Telephone ringing
39
Dec 4, 2016
40
Cost
Time
Service Level
Other
Total
Resolution Concept
Description:
Implementation Cost:
Labor
Materials
Capital
Total
Labor
Materials
Capital
Total
Return on Investment
1st Year
Revenue Generated
Cost Savings
Total Improvement
Implementation Cost
Ongoing Cost
Total Cost
Net Improvement
Return on Investment:
Dec 4, 2016
3 Years
5 Years
41
Inventory
Failure to decrease the customer's credit limit would result in an overstatement of their credit limit. This could lead to a bad debt
situation as future orders are accepted erroneously.
Failure to correctly update inventory for the actual quantity shipped would result in inventory being misstated. This could lead to
over or under-stocking conditions and could affect purchasing's actions.
A - future cycles
VADS Procedure:
2 - Order desk identifies the customer and verifies that their outstanding balance is current via the order entry screen. The system
flags the order as clearing O/S Balance review.
3 - For each item ordered, the system verifies that inventory is available and confirms ship dates.
Customer
Inventory
Due to failures in phase C of a prior VADS cycle, the customer's credit limit is misstated. Additionally the inventory does not
accurately reflect actual shipment information. This can result in a customer's order being refused because of an understated
credit limit or accepted wrongly for an overstated credit limit. Since, in this mode the inventory is also misstated, the order might be
accepted when there is insufficient product to fill the order. This type of failure can adversely impact customer service levels.
Stakeholder
Time
Service Level
Other
Labor to resolve
Reduced reputation
$119,700
Resolution Concept
Description:
A procedural failure to enter the data into the system or lost paperwork could cause the process to breakdown. A safeguard
should be implemented to identify orders that have been picked up for shipping but not invoiced. This safeguard could take the
form of a daily status report that lists orders that have been in the warehouse for over 24 hours.
Labor
Materials
Capital
Total
$25,000
$25,000
Labor
Materials
Capital
Total
$10,800
$18
$10,818
Implementation Cost:
Annual Ongoing Support Cost:
Review time and paper
Time Needed to Implement:
2 months
Return on Investment
Revenue Generated (assumes 1
lost customer per year)
Total Improvement
Implementation Cost
Ongoing Cost
Total Cost
Net Improvement
Return on Investment:
Dec 4, 2016
1st Year
3 Years
5 Years
$119,700
$718,200
$1,795,500
$119,700
$718,200
$1,795,500
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$10,818
$32,454
$54,090
$35,818
$57,454
$79,090
$83,882
$660,746
$1,716,410
1150.04%
2170.20%
234.19%
42
In Closing
Alignment Breeds Success
It requires:
Dec 4, 2016
43