Está en la página 1de 43

Aligning Strategy &

Operational Direction
By

Michael R. Wood
www.gantthead.com SME

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

About Michael R. Wood


Subject Matter Expert on Process Improvement for
www.gantthead.com
Creator of the Helix (Enterprise Alignment & Improvement)
Methodology
CIO for 9 years in the Casino Gaming & Hospitality Industry
Founder of The Natural Intelligence Group, a strategy, process
improvement, and technology consulting company
CPA (Partner in 2 CPA firms)
Adjunct Professor in Pepperdine's Management MBA program
Associate Professor at California Lutheran University
Served on the boards of numerous professional organizations
Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Topics to be Presented
Conditioning the Organization for Change
Discovering Enterprise Requirements
Developing Operationally-Actionable Objectives
Developing Focused Urgency, Momentum and Commitment
Viewing the Organization as a Series of Value-added
Delivery Systems
Driving Alignment Throughout the Enterprise
Models and Techniques that Drive the Process
Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Goal of this Session


To introduce a proven approach for
turning

Strategic Objectives
into
Operational Reality
Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Conditioning the Organization for Change


Principle:

Unconditioned Change Creates


Resistance and Chaos

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Conditioning the Organization for Change


Conditioning for Change Requires:

Context
Collaboration
Concentration
Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Conditioning the Organization for Change

Creating Context

Context provides the WHY of change

Context is the Vision and Objectives


that motivates progress

Creating Context is Managements Job

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Conditioning the Organization for Change

Collaboration
Collaboration Fosters Buy-in

Management must create an


environment where people can freely
exchange ideas in context to the Vision
and related Objectives.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Conditioning the Organization for Change

Concentration
Concentration = Undistracted Focus
Through undistracted focus, things get done!

Dec 4, 2016

Dedication to a single objective is


the fastest way to achieve it
Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Discovering Enterprise Requirements

Discovery is a collaborative process


that allows organizations to learn the
What and How of improving
operations in CONTEXT to its Vision
and Business Objectives.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

10

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Discovering Enterprise Requirements

Allowing organizations and its people to


discover needs before defining solutions is a
critical step missed by most strategic planning
and business process improvement efforts.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

11

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Discovering Enterprise Requirements

Discovery means to define the GAP


between an organizations current state
and its desired future state (vision).

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

12

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Discovering Enterprise Requirements

Vision and Objectives must be:


Measurable
Actionable
Time Constrained
if they are ever to be OPERATIONALIZED

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

13

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Discovering Enterprise Requirements

Operationalizing means to integrate


Objectives into pragmatic, OUTCOME
driven processes.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

14

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Discovering Enterprise Requirements

Therefore:

Discovery must be done in context to the


processes an organization uses to achieve
results (aka Value-added Delivery Systems

Value Streams, etc.).

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

15

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives

Operationally-Actionable Objectives
describe clear and quantifiable
outcomes.

Their achievement can be observed as a


natural by-product of an organizations
Value-added Delivery Systems.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

16

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives
Typical Objective

Actionable Objective

To provide top
To provide top quality
quality service to our
service to our
customers
customers by:

No Measures

Not translatable into


action

Keeping defective
returns below 10 per day

Shipping product the


same day its ordered

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

17

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives
Typical Objective
To improve our product
mix to more closely align
with emerging market
demand

Dec 4, 2016

Actionable Objective
To respond to our
customers desire for cars
that get 30 M.P.G. by
developing a line of midsized cars that meet or
exceed their expectation
by the year 2010

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

18

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives

Operationally-Actionable Objectives can


be specifically related to Value-added
Delivery Systems and their related work
tasks.

They set the bar, create the vision and


the challenge.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

19

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Operationally-Actionable
Objectives - 8 Point Test
What operational area does
the objective relate to?

How will the improvement


manifest itself in operations?

What improvement will the


objective achieve?

How will the improvement be


measured?

How does the improvement

What Value-added Delivery

add value to stakeholders?

Systems are affected by the


objective?

How would these


stakeholders discern this
added value?

Dec 4, 2016

Which workgroups will be


involved in achieving the
objective?
Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

20

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Focused Urgency, Momentum


and Commitment

Focused Urgency requires single minded dedication


to a well defined outcome

Momentum is achieved by Managements continuous


and unwavering commitment to achieving its Vision

Commitment requires engaging of the workforce in a


Structured Collaboration that results in defining
ways to achieve actionable business objectives

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

21

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Focused Urgency, Momentum


and Commitment

Successful organizations have learned how to


rally knowledge workers around a common
cause that continuously moves it towards its
strategic objectives.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

22

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Developing Focused Urgency, Momentum


and Commitment

To rally knowledge workers, management


must allow them to contribute to how
businesses processes need to be changed in
order to achieve the organizations objectives.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

23

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Viewing the Organization as a Series of


Value-added Delivery Systems
VADS View
SELLING

Stove Pipe View


CEO

COLLECTING

Sales &
Marketing

Finance

Accts
Rec.

BUYING

Dec 4, 2016

Wharehouse

Accounting

SHIPPING

PAYING

Advertising

Accts
Pay.

TV
Shipping

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Receiving

Sales

Print
Order
Process

Direct
Mktg

24

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Viewing the Organization as a Series of


Value-added Delivery Systems
The Key is to use objectives to drive changes in the
way value is delivered to stakeholders.

Process of Driving Objectives to the VADS Level


Develop
objectives
in context to the
operation

Dec 4, 2016

Identify VADS
that are affected
by the objective

Identify the
process groups that
participate in the
VADS affected

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Organize cross functional


teams to identify & define
process improvements
needed to achieve the
objective

25

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Driving Alignment Throughout the


Enterprise

When the organization's strategic


objectives are manifest in the outcomes its
operations produce you have ALIGNMENT.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

26

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Driving Alignment Throughout the


Enterprise
Stakeholder Needs

Strategic Direction

Business Objectives

Value Added Delivery


Systems & Process Groups

Information Being Shared /


Moved

Process group Actions

Process Sequence

VADS Object
Transformation

Process Failure &


VADS Impediments

Value Added

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

27

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the


Process
Change Analysis
Workflow Models
Level 1
Level 2

Object Transformation & Stimulus


Trigger Analysis
Failure Analysis
Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

28

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the


Process - Change Analysis

Defines existing, objective limiting,


situations and goal driven changes for
achieving that objective.

The first step in building commitment


and momentum for positive change

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

29

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the


Process - Change Analysis
Change Analysis
Current Situation
1

Preliminary Goal

It takes too long to process sales orders


through Credit.

Dec 4, 2016

Too Long = more than 45 minutes from


the time the Credit Manager receives the
order from the order desk until the time
the order is released to the warehouse
for shipping.
This is bad because it means that orders
received after 2 p.m. cannot be shipped
until the next business day. This results
in poor customer service.

The ability to process work orders directly to


the warehouse where the customers available
credit line is greater than the order amount
and his outstanding balance is current.
This would require a change to our order
processing system.
Specifically, it would require the system
to automatically check the order for
credit-related data and route it to the
appropriate location (credit department or
warehouse).

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

30

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the


Process - Level 1 Workflow Model

Depicts a Value-added Delivery System in


terms of how people and workgroups
communicate in order to complete an end-toend process cycle

Identifies critical objects and the


transformations that occur in order to achieve
successful completion

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

31

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the Process - Level 1 Workflow Model
L e v e l 1 W o r k flo w
V A D S N a m e : S a le s O r d e r s o n A c c o u n t

R e fe re n c e : W F L 1 -S O A

A s s u m p t io n : S a le s O r d e r s o n A c c o u n t w h e n t h e C u s t o m e r 's C r e d it lim it is G o o d , I n v e n t o r y is A v a ila b le a n d C u s t o m e r P a y s o n T im e .

M odel

- C u s t o m e r C a lls in O r d e r

S te p s

C u s to m e r

S a le s O r d e r D e s k

S a le s O r d e r
S y s te m

B illin g

11

C u s t o m e r c a lls a n o r d e r in t o t h e
S a le s O r d e r D e s k .

2.

S a le s O r d e r D e s k e n te r s th e o r d e r
in t o th e S a le s O r d e r S y s t e m .

3.

S a le s O r d e r S y s te m p r in ts a
R o u g h O r d e r a t t h e S a le s O r d e r
D esk.

4.

S a le s O r d e r D e s k fo r w a r d s th e
R o u g h O r d e r t o t h e C r e d it
D e p a r t m e n t f o r a p p r o v a l.

5.

C r e d it D e p a r t m e n t r e v ie w s
C u s t o m e r 's C r e d it s t a t u s in t h e
S a le s O r d e r S y s te m a n d a p p r o v e s
th e o rd e r

6.

C r e d it D e p a r t m e n t f o r w a r d s t h e
A p p ro v e d O r d e r to th e
W a re h o u s e .

7.

W a r e h o u s e s h ip s t h e o r d e r a n d
f o r w a r d s t h e o r d e r t o B illin g .

8.

B illin g f in a liz e s t h e S h ip p e d O r d e r
in S a le s O r d e r S y s t e m a n d p r in t s
in v o ic e .

9.

B illin g m a ils I n v o ic e t o C u s t o m e r .

5
C o p y o f I n v o ic e
to P ro d u c t
A n a ly s is G r o u p

Order for Approval

- Shipped Order -

10

1.

10.

C u s t o m e r r e m it s p a y m e n t t o
B illin g .

11.

B illin g p o s t s C u s t o m e r 's p a y m e n t
in S a le s O r d e r S y s t e m .

6
W a re h o u s e

Dec 4, 2016

- A p p ro v e d O rd e r -

C r e d it D e p a r tm e n t

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

32

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the


Process - Level 2 Workflow Model

Depicts a VADS cycle, its phases and


procedures.
Provides a platform for:
Mapping Goals to Process
Testing proper object transformation
Conducting Failure Analysis
and more ...

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

33

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

B eg. S tatus

Models and Techniques that Drive the Process Level 2 Workflow Model
Phase A

Phase B

Phase C

Phase D

A customer wanting to order product

Approved sales order ready for


shipping

Shipped sales order ready for


billing

Billed sales order pending


collection

1 The customer calls the order

1 Warehouse receives order via

desk with an order.

printer.

1 Billing receives order from


warehouse.

2 Customer sends payment to

Order Entry Process


2 Order desk identifies the
customer and verifies that their

P
R

outstanding balance is current via

O
C

the order entry screen. The system


flags the order as clearing O/S
PG1
Balance review.

E
D

billing.
2 Warehouse picks order and
updates quantities picked on
the order form.

desk verifies the inventory is


available and confirms ship dates.
PO4

4 Upon completion of the order, the

2 Billing retrieves order from the


system and enters the actual
quantities shipped.

3 Billing retrieves the customer's


invoice from the system and
posts the payment.

3 Warehouse packages and


ships order to customer.

3 For each item ordered, the order

1 Customer receives the invoice.

3 The system updates inventory,


adjusts the customer credit limit
and creates the invoice.

4 Warehouse sends shipped


order to billing.

4 The system updates the


customer's credit limit and
accounts receivable balance.

4 Billing prints the invoice and


mails to customer.

system reserves the inventory


being ordered, sets its status to
"Approved" and prints it directly to
the warehouse printer.
PG2

PG3

PO2

Approved sales order ready for shipping

E ffort

Lapsed E nd
Tim e S tatus

PG1

5 minutes

5 minutes
Dec 4, 2016

PO1

Shipped sales order ready for


billing
1 day

PO1

1 hour
Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Billed sales order pending


collection

Collected sales order

2 hours

45 days

10 minutes

10 minutes

34

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the Process


Object Transformation & Stimulus Trigger Analysis

Object Transformation Testing ensures that


essential subject matter is properly updated
during a VADS cycle.

Stimulus Trigger Analysis ensures that


efficient cues are designed into processes so
that work is performed on a timely basis.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

35

Summary of Secondary Object Transformation Failures


VADS NAME: Sales Orders on Account
Secondary
Object

VADS Phase

Shipped sales
order ready for
billing

Customer

3 The system updates


inventory, adjusts the
customer credit limit and
creates the invoice.

Shipped sales
order ready for
billing

Inventory

3 The system updates


inventory, adjusts the
customer credit limit and
creates the invoice.

Customer

VADS REF.: OTR-SOA


Procedure

Rule

Impact of Failure

Safeguard

The customers credit limit


should be increased for the
amount of the original
order and decreased for
the value of the invoice.

Failure to decrease the


customer's credit limit would
result in a overstatement of their
credit limit. This could lead to a
bad debt situation as future
orders are accepted
erroneously.

The inventory available for


sale should be increased
for the original quantity
reserved and decreased
for the actual quantity
shipped to the customer.
This should be done for
each item shipped.
4 The system updates the
The customers credit limit
customer's credit limit and should be increased for the
accounts receivable
value of payments
balance.
received (posted).

Failure to correctly update


inventory for the actual quantity
shipped would result in
inventory being misstated. This
could lead to over- or understocking conditions and could
affect purchasing's actions.

A procedural failure to enter the


data into the system or lost
paperwork could cause the
process to breakdown. A
safeguard should be implemented
to identify orders that have been
picked up for shipping but not
invoiced. This safeguard could
take the form of a daily status
report that lists orders that have
been in the warehouse for over
24 hours.
Same as above.

Billed sales
order pending
collection

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Failure to increase the


customer's credit limit for
payments received could result
in a customer erroneously failing
to pass the credit check. This
could result in a lost order or
even a lost customer.

A procedural failure to enter the


payments into the system would
cause the process to breakdown.
A safeguard should be
implemented to identify orders
that have been invoiced but not
collected within the customer's
paying habit time period. This
safeguard could take the form of
a daily status report that lists
invoices that have been paid
within the customer's normal
paying habit time period.

36

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the Process - Proof of Correctness

Correlating Situations to Workflow


First Proof of Correctness
Situation

Goal

A. No inventory
available

No shortfalls

B. Slow
.collections

Average
38 days

Isolating
Isolatingproblems
problemsalong
along
flow
flowline,
line,helps
helpspeople
people
visualize
visualizewhere
whereproblems
problems
occur
occurand
andget
getleverage
leverage
on
change.
on change.
Dec 4, 2016

Existing WFL2
Beg
Status
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
End
Status

Customer wants
product

Open Order

1. ------ 1. -----2. ----A


3. ----- 2. ----4. ---3. ----Open Order

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

Shipped Order

Shipped Order

Billed Order

1. ------ 1. -----2. ----3. ----- 2. B----4. ---3. ----Billed Order

Paid Order

37

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the Process - Proof of Correctness

Correlating Goals to Conceptual Workflow


Second Proof of Correctness
Situation

Goal

A. No inventory
available

No shortfalls

B. Slow
collections

Average
38 days

Mapping
Mappinggoals
goalsto
tothe
the
proposed
workflow
proposed workflowhelps
helps
people
visualize
new
people visualize new
procedures
procedures and
andunderstand
understand
operational
impact.
operational impact.

Proposed WFL2
Beg
Status
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
End
Status

Customer wants
product

Open Order

Shipped Order

Billed Order

1. ------ 1. ------ 1. ------ 1. -----2. ----2. ----A


3. ----- 2. ----- 3. ----- 2.B ----4. ---4. B---3. ----3. ----Open Order

Shipped Order

Billed Order

Paid Order

Change
ChangePoints
Points are
are
Identified
Identified
Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

38

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the Process


Stimulus Trigger Analysis

STIMULUS TRIGGER DIAGNOSTIC FORM


VADS NAME: Sales Orders on Account
VADS Phase
A customer wanting to order
product
Approved sales order ready for
shipping

Dec 4, 2016

VADS REF.: VS-SOA


Process Group

Sales Order Desk

Warehouse

Stimulus Trigger

Action and Timing

Telephone ringing

Answer telephone within 3 rings

Beep from paging system

Pick up order and update system


with order PIN # within 30 minutes
of page

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

39

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

Models and Techniques that Drive the


Process - Failure Analysis

Tests the workflow for the impact of


procedural breakdowns on the:
Current VADS cycle
Future VADS cycles
Other VADS

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

40

Failure Analysis Form


VADS NAME: ____________________

VADS REF.: FA-____

Where Failure Occurs


VADS Phase:
VADS Procedure:
Object(s) Failing to Transform:
Description of Failure

Where Failure is Realized


VADS Phase:
VADS Procedure:
Object(s) Failing to Transform:
Description of Failure:

Lost Value Due to Failure


Value Lost
Stakeholder

Cost

Time

Service Level

Other

Total

Resolution Concept
Description:
Implementation Cost:
Labor

Materials

Capital

Total

Labor

Materials

Capital

Total

Annual Ongoing Support Cost:

Time Needed to Implement:

Return on Investment
1st Year
Revenue Generated
Cost Savings
Total Improvement
Implementation Cost
Ongoing Cost
Total Cost
Net Improvement
Return on Investment:
Dec 4, 2016

3 Years

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

5 Years

41

Failure Analysis Form


VADS NAME: Sales on Account

VADS REF.: FA-SOA-C3

Where Failure Occurs


VADS Phase:
VADS Procedure:
Object(s) Failing to Transform:
Description of Failure

Shipped sales order ready for billing


The system updates inventory, adjusts the customer credit limit and creates the invoice.
Customer

Inventory

Failure to decrease the customer's credit limit would result in an overstatement of their credit limit. This could lead to a bad debt
situation as future orders are accepted erroneously.
Failure to correctly update inventory for the actual quantity shipped would result in inventory being misstated. This could lead to
over or under-stocking conditions and could affect purchasing's actions.

Where Failure is Realized


VADS Phase:

A - future cycles

VADS Procedure:

2 - Order desk identifies the customer and verifies that their outstanding balance is current via the order entry screen. The system
flags the order as clearing O/S Balance review.
3 - For each item ordered, the system verifies that inventory is available and confirms ship dates.

Object(s) Failing to Transform:


Description of Failure:

Customer

Inventory

Due to failures in phase C of a prior VADS cycle, the customer's credit limit is misstated. Additionally the inventory does not
accurately reflect actual shipment information. This can result in a customer's order being refused because of an understated
credit limit or accepted wrongly for an overstated credit limit. Since, in this mode the inventory is also misstated, the order might be
accepted when there is insufficient product to fill the order. This type of failure can adversely impact customer service levels.

Lost Value Due to Failure


Value Lost
Cost

Stakeholder

Customer - Value of order or


even customer
Owners - Lost revenue Assumes one lost customer a
year.
Total

Time

Service Level

Other

Poor customer service


$119,700

Labor to resolve

Reduced reputation

$119,700

Resolution Concept
Description:

A procedural failure to enter the data into the system or lost paperwork could cause the process to breakdown. A safeguard
should be implemented to identify orders that have been picked up for shipping but not invoiced. This safeguard could take the
form of a daily status report that lists orders that have been in the warehouse for over 24 hours.
Labor

Materials

Capital

Total

$25,000

$25,000

Labor

Materials

Capital

Total

$10,800

$18

$10,818

Implementation Cost:
Annual Ongoing Support Cost:
Review time and paper
Time Needed to Implement:

2 months

Return on Investment
Revenue Generated (assumes 1
lost customer per year)
Total Improvement
Implementation Cost
Ongoing Cost
Total Cost
Net Improvement
Return on Investment:

Dec 4, 2016

1st Year

3 Years

5 Years

$119,700

$718,200

$1,795,500

$119,700

$718,200

$1,795,500

$25,000

$25,000

$25,000

$10,818

$32,454

$54,090

$35,818

$57,454

$79,090

$83,882

$660,746

$1,716,410

1150.04%

2170.20%

234.19%

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

42

Aligning Strategy & Operational Direction

In Closing
Alignment Breeds Success
It requires:

Context (actionable vision & objectives )


Collaboration (across functional areas)
Concentration (dedicated focus)

It requires an approach that is logical,


practical and comprehensive.

Dec 4, 2016

Copyright Michael R. Wood - 2008

43

También podría gustarte