Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
en nios
Results
The mean follow-up was for 12 months.
There were no intraoperative or postoperative
complications.
All the fractures healed satisfactorily and were united
at the time of radiological assessment at three
months.
There were no angular deformities at review. There
were no cases of avascular necrosis, nonunion or
epiphyseal overgrowth.
The skin wounds healed well and the cosmetic
appearance was acceptable. In all patients there was
a full range of movement.
Conlcussion
Treatment of minimally displaced
lateral condyle fractures is somewhat
controversial.
However, as the elbow structures in
this age group are incompletely
ossified, determining the amount of
displacement can be difficult, and
the amount can be misleading.
Results
Radiological hypertrophy of the lateral condyle
was present in 45 cases (42 %).
Three patients developed a pseudo-cubitus
varus deformity.
Further four patients developed a true cubitus
varus.
There was one case of superficial infection of the
K-wires and one case of delayed union.
At the latest follow-up, 96 % of the patients
achieved an excellent final result and 4 % a good
final result.
Methods:
We prospectively treated sixty-three
unstable and assessed the quality of
closed reduction.
Results:
Thirteen of seventeen stage-3 fractures were
reduced to 1 mm of residual displacement. Thirty
of forty stage-4 fractures and three of six stage-5
fractures were reduced to 2 mm of displacement.
In ten of forty stage-4 fractures and three of six
stage-5 fractures, closed reduction to within 2 mm
failed and open reduction and internal fixation was
performed. There were no major complications
such as osteonecrosis of the trochlea or capitellum,
nonunion, malunion, or early physeal arrest.
Conclusions
Closed reduction and internal fixation is an
effective treatment for unstable displaced
lateral condylar fractures of the humerus in
many children. If fracture displacement
after closed reduction exceeds 2 mm,
open reduction and internal fixation is
recommended.
Results
All nonunions united. There were no
cases of avascular necrosis. A lateral
condylar spur formation was
radiographically visible in 3 cases but
had no cosmetic or functional
significance. All patients were
painfree. The range of motion was
unchanged or improved in all cases.
Results
Conservative treatment was
exclusive to cases of lateral condyle
displacement equal to or less than
1mm. All other fractures were
managed by surgical open reduction
and fixation using cross-pinning.
There was no statistically significant
difference in clinical or radiological
outcome between conservative and
surgical management.
Discussion
Lateral humeral condyle fracture is difficult
to diagnose in children.
The majority of poor results reported in
literature relate to inadequate initial
treatment.
Given a radiological aspect of hemarthrosis
of the elbow, the emergency physician
prescribes multiple X-ray views of the
affected elbow.
Conclusion
When compared to metal fixation, bioabsorbable
fixation of lateral condyle fractures of the elbow was
safe. It also is costeffective when for hardware removal,
a second anaesthetic is planned.
No clinically relevant specific complication or adverse
reaction could be attributed directly to the
bioabsorbable material. More than four years after
surgery, the functional outcome was excellent.
Nonsignificant radiographic bone modifications around
the fracture were noted in both groups. Using
bioabsorbable material for the surgical treatment of
lateral condyle fractures of the elbow appeared as a
satisfying alternative to metal K-wires.