Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
PROGRAMME
to
INDUSTRY & COMMUNITY
KTP GRANT SCHEME THIRD ROLLING PLAN
(2013-2014)
Prepared By:
Knowledge Transfer Programme Committee
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
CONTENT
1.
Overview
2.
Policy
3.
4.
Model of Implementation
5.
Implementation Plan
6.
Impact Measurement
7.
8.
9.
OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW (CONTD)
Requirements
How Malaysian HEIs can assist in delivering and transferring knowledge
created in their institutions to the industry and or community.
Differentiation need to be made as not to overlap with other CAPs
which can also contain elements of KT such as commercialisation,
entrepreneurship and employability CAPs.
The knowledge to be transferred need to be based on certain
fundamentals which need to be determined.
OVERVIEW (CONTD)
THE WORKSHOP
OVERVIEW (CONTD)
KTP LAUNCHING CEREMONY
POLICY
BACKGROUND OF KTP
POLICY
POLICY
OBJECTIVE OF KTP
To recognize and promote the transfer of knowledge
via the exchange of creative and innovative ideas,
research findings, experiences and skills between
IPTA, industries, government agencies and the wider
community.
POLICY
GOAL OF KTP
To enable the development and improvement of the
quality of products, services and policies to be
shared for mutual benefits between the stakeholders
i.e. academia, industry, community and the
graduate/postgraduate intern.
POLICY
POLICY
Issues
Challenges
POLICY
POLICY
SWOT ANALYSIS
STRENGTHS
Expertise and Capacity of academicians and nonacademicians in the University
University as a pool of innovative ideas
Abundance of volunteerism among university students
and staff
The autonomy to engage the community
Long and proven track records in community engagement
and services
WEAKNESSES
Lack of formalisation of partnership and commitment
from the experts in the University
Measurement of impact of social innovation projects
especially the intangibles
Documentation of all KTP projects
Wide and varying definitions of the scope of the
knowledge transfer
No clear connection with the target groups
Level of rewards and recognition varies between
universities
Lack of governance and leadership at University level in
support of KTP in community engagement
Varying ecosystems within individual universities
OPPORTUNITIES
Potential to enhance & enrich current knowledge
through KTP initiatives exist
The need to preserve good and noble values and passion
in existing initiatives
Enhancing meaningful community services in community
engagement
Paradigm shift from current service-oriented to
scholarly-oriented community project.
Empowerment and capacity building of the recipient
groups
Possible partnership with more focused NGOs
Reciprocity of knowledge transfer and exchange
THREATS
No clear policy in existence to support KTP in community
Reluctance of the academic staff to engage in the
knowledge transfer
Lack of commitment and support by certain industryies
on community engagement
POLICY
POLICY
Through
POLICY
POLICY
POLICY
Timeline
Responsibility
Jan 2011
Jan 2011
Mac 2011
National
projects
First
Rolling
Plan
Mac 2011
IPTA
POLICY
Second
KTP Launching
Rolling
Plan
Responsibility
IPTA,USM
& MoHE
Roadshow
Committee &
IPTA
IPTA,USM
& MoHE
IPTA,USM
& MoHE
IPTA,USM
& MoHE
POLICY
EDU
ECO
GT
DG
IRC
MODELS OF IMPLEMENTATION
o KTP Programme shall include the involvement of the following :
KPI
MEASUREMENT
KTP
KTP
ACADEMI
ACADEMI
A
A
KTP
KTP
INTERN
INTERN
KTP
KTP
INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY //
COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY
Graduate
Graduate/ /
Postgraduate
Postgraduate
Intern
Intern
STRATEGIC
INNOVATIO
N
Community/
Community/
Industry
Industry
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The projects for the third phase of the 10th Malaysian Plan would be
roll-out based on the following details with the cost breakdown for
the implementation plans is as follows:
DURATION
IPTAs
INVOLVED
2 years
(2013-2014)
20
IMPACT MEASUREMENT
KRA will be determined by MoHE
Impact measurement to be approved by KTP Project Committee
Impact measurement every three months through Periodic
Progress Report of Project Leader
every six months through Periodic
Progress Report of partner (industry /
community)
Impact Measurement
Proxy Indicator
(Intermediate
Measurement)
% improvement in public
examination identified
Acceptance of curriculum by
industry and applied by Education
institutions
Progress reporting
Output
Impact
Capacity building
Concept of KTP
Definition of KTP grant
Purpose of KTP grant
KRA of KTP
Condition for application
Procedure of application
Evaluation criteria
Financial and budgetary
consideration
Output of project (No. involved)
Outcome/impact of project
(benefit)
Announcement date of opening
and closing
Roadshow
Evaluation
Result and disbursement of grant
Monitoring
Other matters
KTP
KTP INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES 2.0
2.0 VERSION
VERSION
KTP
KTP INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY APPLICATION
APPLICATION FORM
FORM 2.0
2.0 VERSIO
VERSIO
N
N
KTP
KTP FLAGSHIP
FLAGSHIP INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY APPLICATION
APPLICATION FORM
FORM 22
.0
.0 VERSION
VERSION
KTP
KTP COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES 2.0
2.0 VERSION
VERSION
KTP
KTP COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY APPLICATION
APPLICATION FORM
FORM 2.0
2.0 VERS
VERS
ION
ION
KTP
KTP FLAGSHIP
FLAGSHIP COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY APPLICATION
APPLICATION FORM
FORM
2.0
2.0 VERSION
VERSION
COMMUNITY - 230
NO.
INDUSTRY
COMMUNITY
1.
14
118
2.
52
54
23
34
4.
20
5.
95
230
TOTAL
COMMUNITY - 16
INDUSTRY- 28
Total of Project = 44
NO.
TOTAL
1.
Education
-Raising level of education in certain
areas
2.
12
3.
11
4.
5.
TOTAL
28
NO.
TOTAL
1.
Education
-Raising level of education in certain
areas
2.
3.
4.
5.
TOTAL
16
COMMUNITY - 238
NO.
KRA
INDUSTRY
COMMUNITY
1.
33
2.
95
42
3.
126
4.
40
36
5.
10
152
238
TOTAL
FLAGSHIP - 20
COMMUNITY - 28
INDUSTRY- 44
Total of Project = 92
NO.
1.
2.
3.
Education
-Raising level of education
in certain areas
Economic gains for
sectors of industry in
identified sector
Sustainability and Green
technology Initiatives
4.
The Disadvantaged
Groups
5.
Developing Industry
Relevant Curriculum (for
High Impact sector)
TOTAL
PROJECT
FLAGSHIP
24
11
15
44
20
NO.
1.
2.
PROJECT
16
4.
5.
3.
TOTAL
28
1 NOVEMBER 2012
depends on PTJ
7 DECEMBER 2012
Application Evaluation
& Selection Period
14 JANUARY 2013
Announcement of
successful applications:
21 JANUARY 2013
Bottom Up
38 projects for Industry RM7.6 million
17 projects for Community RM3.4 million
Top Down
21 Flagship projects for Industry RM4.2 million
9 Flagship projects for Community RM1.8 million
Thank