This document provides an overview of cold in-place recycling (CIPR) technology. CIPR involves scarifying existing pavement layers up to 350mm depth and adding stabilizing agents like cement or bituminous materials before relaying the material. CIPR provides a more cost-effective rehabilitation alternative compared to full reconstruction. The document discusses CIPR research programs in Malaysia, suitable distress conditions for CIPR, materials used, design considerations, construction process, quality control requirements, and advantages of CIPR.
This document provides an overview of cold in-place recycling (CIPR) technology. CIPR involves scarifying existing pavement layers up to 350mm depth and adding stabilizing agents like cement or bituminous materials before relaying the material. CIPR provides a more cost-effective rehabilitation alternative compared to full reconstruction. The document discusses CIPR research programs in Malaysia, suitable distress conditions for CIPR, materials used, design considerations, construction process, quality control requirements, and advantages of CIPR.
This document provides an overview of cold in-place recycling (CIPR) technology. CIPR involves scarifying existing pavement layers up to 350mm depth and adding stabilizing agents like cement or bituminous materials before relaying the material. CIPR provides a more cost-effective rehabilitation alternative compared to full reconstruction. The document discusses CIPR research programs in Malaysia, suitable distress conditions for CIPR, materials used, design considerations, construction process, quality control requirements, and advantages of CIPR.
In this technique, the recycling machine scarifies the existing pavement layers, to maximum depth of 350mm, then adds either cement or bituminous materials or both as stabilizing additives before relaying it back on the same pavement area in a single process. CIPR provides a more cost- effective alternative to pavement rehabilitation that requires partial or total reconstruction . BACKGROUND OF CIPR Pavement Recycling has been used in Malaysia since 28 years ago 1985 - Rehabilitation of FT02 between Kuala Lumpur and Kuantan (Temerloh) 1988 - FT 08 between Pagar Sasak and Merapoh, Pahang using cement as a stabilising agent 2002 Jalan Felda Bukit Sagu in Pahang (Foamed bitumen) Until now more than 300 km length of CIPR projects were successfully completed by HCM and Roadcare in Malaysia COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR)
RESEARCH PROGRAM RESEARCH PROGRAM The research program on Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) was initiated in 2004 and completed in 2012.
Collaboration between the Public Works Department and Kumpulan IKRAM Sdn. Bhd.
The research activities involved site construction, field test, laboratory test and simulation test.
Four stabilizing agents namely cement, lime, emulsion and foamed asphalt are employed in this research. RESEARCH PROGRAM This research aims to find out the fundamental properties of stabilized reclaimed pavement obtained through the Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) technique and the most cost effective stabilization technique for reclaimed pavement.
The results from this research are used to predict the performance of FDR pavements in Malaysia.
A guideline on the design and construction of FDR pavement will be produced based on the results of this research.
CIPR WHERE TO USE?
Severe Crocodile Cracks Rutting or Deformation Pumping MAJOR DISTRESS Structural failure CIPR WHERE TO USE?
BLOCK CRACKING INSUFFICIENT PAVEMENT STRUCTURE DEEP RUTTING or DEFORMATION SEVERE CRACKS AND POTHOLE MATERIALS Materials used in CIPR
Existing pavement material Imported pavement material (where required) Stabilising agents
MATERIALS Stabilising agents used in CIPR Cement Emulsion (QS3E) Foamed Bitumen Other additives COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR)
PAVEMENT EVALUATION, DESIGN AND COST ANALYSIS PAVEMENT EVALUATION Data Collection / Testing Analysis Design PROCESS OF PAVEMENT EVALUATION Comprehensive Analysis D or ND Test S.C.S. Laboratory test Analysis of Data Identify Primary Modes of Distress Implementation Economy? Suitability? Treatment Method PENDOS Output NO OK PAVEMENT EVALUATION PAVEMENT EVALUATION
-FWD -Testpit -Coring/DCP -Axle load study PAVEMENT DESIGN Empirical Componen Analysis using Arahan Teknik Jalan 5/85 as a guideline Mechanistic analysis method using software Rubicon Mix design using samples taken from test pit at site COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (Cement)
Proposed Design Conventional Design 40 mm ACWC (overlay) 160 mm ACBC CIPR- Cement Partial Reconstruction (Remove Asphalt layer) 340 mm 200mm CIPR (cement) 300 mm 50mm ACWC + 60mm ACBC (overlay) Sub-grade layer Design Comparison COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR - with Cement) Cost Analysis * Unit Rate used in cost analysis Asphaltic Concrete Wearing Course (ACWC20) Asphaltic Concrete Binder Course (ACBC28) Prime Coat Tack Coat Milling existing asphalt layers not exceeding 150mm depth Cold In-Place Recycling (CIPR) not exceeding 200mm depth using 4% cement (CTB) Description of Works Unit Rate (RM) cu.m cu.m sq.m sq.m sq.m sq.m 657.14 636.57 17.40 20.90 1.76 1.65 * Based on schedule of rates for road maintenance in Peninsular Malaysia COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR - with Cement) Cost Analysis Conventional Design (Mill and Pave)
Cost/m
(RM)
40mm ACWC (overlay) Milling 150mm Deep
=
17.40
80mm ACBC
Prime Coat
= 1.76
80mm ACBC
ACBC 160mm
=
101.85
Tack Coat (2layers)
= 3.30
ACWC 40mm (overlay) = 26.27
Cost per sq.m = RM 150.58
Existing Road Base
Sub base
COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR - with Cement)
Cost/m
(RM)
50mm ACWC (overlay)
Recycle 200mm with 4 % Cement
= 20.90
60mm ACBC Prime Coat = 1.76
ACBC 60mm
=
38.19
Tack Coat (1 layers)
= 1.65
200mm Recycle ACWC 50mm (overlay)
=
32.85
Cost per sq.m = RM 95.35
Existing Road Base
Sub base
Proposed Design (Cement Treated base) (overlay) Cost Analysis Existing Pavement Structure Conventional Design (Partial Reconstruction- Remove Asphalt Layer) 50 mm ACWC (overlay) Sub-grade layer 150 mm ACBC 150 mm Asphalt Road Base 350 mm Cost per m 2 = RM 95.35 350 mm 200mm CIPR (cement) 300 mm Proposed Design (CIPR-Cement) 50mm ACWC + 60mm ACBC (overlay) Required overlay 135mm Mill and replace 150 mm COST COMPARISON (Structural Component Analysis) Cost per m 2 = RM 150.58 COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR)
TYPICAL TYPE OF RECYCLER RECYCLER WITH TAMPING SCREED RECYCLER WITHOUT TAMPING SCREED COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (Cement)
TYPICAL TYPE OF RECYCLER Direct Injection of Cement Using WM1000 (Slurry) At Pasir Puteh Kelantan Manually Spread Mechanical Spreader COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (Cement)
PLACING THE RECYCLED MATERIAL & COMPACTION PLACING THE RECYCLED MATERIAL INITIAL COMPACTION COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (Cement) TRIMMING & COMPACTION TRIMMING (if necessary) FINAL COMPACTION COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (Lime) COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (Foamed Bitumen)
To ensure final product conforms to specification Test include Measurement of relevant strength (Resilient Modulus, ITS, UCS) Field density test Measurement of layer thickness QUALITY CONTROL Field Test Prepare of Sample Testing Field Density Test in progress to check degree of compaction Strength of material test Unconfined Compressive Strength Test (UCS) QUALITY CONTROL General Requirements for Cold Recycling No. Parameters Test Method Requirements 1. Field Compaction REAM-SP 1/2005 Clause 1.5.3 Table 1.8, BS 1377 (Sand Replacement Method) a)
95% for natural gravel / crushed aggregates. b)
97% for mixture of crushed aggregates and Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) c) 98% for RAP of Job Standard Mixture (JSM) 2. Cement Application Rate REAM-SP 1/2005 Clause 1.5.3 Table 1.8 10% of target rate QUALITY CONTROL General Requirements for Cold Recycling No. Parameters Test Method Requirements 3. Depth of Recycling REAM-SP 1/2005 Clause 1.5.3 Table 1.8 10mm of target depth 4. Thickness of Recycled Layer REAM-SP 1/2005 Clause 1.5.3 Table 1.8
20% of the Optimum Moister Content determined from AASHTO test T180 QUALITY CONTROL Requirements for Cement Stabilised Cold In-Place Recycled Layer Material Parameter Requirement Unconfined Compression Test (UCS), in accordance with B.S 1881, part 116. 7- day strength, moist curing @ 25 o C, height/width 1:1 Minimum 97% of Mod. AASHTO density Range (MPa) (minimum and maximum limits) 2 5 Indirect tensile test (ITS) on 150mm diameter briquette cured as for UCS specimens, in accordance with AASHTO T-198 Minimum 97% of Mod. AASHTO density Minimum (MPa) 0.2 Maximum cement content by weight 5% QUALITY CONTROL Requirements for Bitumen Emulsion Treated Cold In-Place Recycled Layer Material Parameter Requirement Unconfined Compression Test (UCS), in accordance with B.S 1881, part 116. 7-day strength, moist curing @ 25 o C, height/width 1:1 Minimum 97% of Mod. AASHTO density 0.7 Indirect tensile test (ITS) on 100mm diameter briquette cured at 40 o C for 72 hours, in accordance with AASHTO T-198 Marshall compaction (75 blows per side)
0.2 Indirect tensile test (ITS) on cured briquettes soaked for 24 hours as above Marshall compaction (75 blows per side) 0.15 Minimum Tensile Strength Retained (TSR) 75% Maximum added cement content by weight 2% QUALITY CONTROL Requirements for Foamed Bitumen Treated Cold In-Place Recycled Layer Material
Parameter Minimum Strength (MPa) Unconfined Compression Test (UCS), in accordance with B.S 1881, part 116. 7-day strength, moist curing @ 25 o C, height/width 1:1 Minimum 97% of Mod. AASHTO density 0.7 Indirect tensile test (ITS) on 100mm diameter briquette cured at 40 o C for 72 hours, in accordance with AASHTO T-198 Marshall compaction (75 blows per side)
0.2 Indirect tensile test (ITS) on cured briquettes soaked for 24 hours as above Marshall compaction (75 blows per side) 0.15 Minimum Tensile Strength Retained (TSR) 75% Maximum added cement content by weight 2% COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR) Advantages 1. Faster and more efficient as minimal excavation and dump trucks required; 2. Reused of existing materials and reduces new construction materials and transport cost; 3. The technique can give equivalent pavement structure condition and cost saving compare with conventional method; 4. Increases the shear strength and reduces the moisture susceptibility of granular materials; 5. Flexible and fatigue resistant (Foamed Bitumen and Emulsion); 6. Cost savings with approximately 25% - 55%. Advantages 7. Consistent Mixing 8. Precise control of layer thickness. 9. Less reliance on fine weather conditions. 10. Greatly reduced traffic disruption and improved safety COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR) COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING (CIPR) Disadvantages 1. Doesnt solve problems with base course or subgrade 2. Material and construction variation is greater than for conventional rehabilitation techniques. 3. The CIPR mixture need to be cured for a period of time in order to gain strength. 4. Difficulty of controlling the density during works. Before Construction During Construction After Construction COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING PROCESS COLD IN PLACE RECYCLING IN PROGRESS THANK YOU