Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
were coerced or forced to vote for who apparently won. Trough July & August the highest authority in this area will have to decide whether to annul the election to the accumulation of evidence that there are irregularities but they dont want to see. Mexican society is expressing dissatisfaction as it had never done thanks to social networks and is taking the streets by hundreds of thousands without being summoned by any political party or leader.
Dont fuck me, Ive just arrived
2.
Gifts for votes. Reports presents everything from cell phones and small appliances or domestic appliances to building materials to the poorest people.
Hauling people to take her to vote. The NGO Civic Alliance was accredited as an observer mentioned that there were 14% of the voting booth that were present. Coercion of the vote. Reports of vote coercion through intimidation, threats of job consequences or threats of physical violence outside of the boxes.
3.
4.
5.
Violation of the secret ballot. Situations in which the voters were questioned for whom they would vote or who voted. The NGO Civic Alliance reports that in 21% of the voting booth that were present voters were unable to vote in secret and I quote: "We note that the main deficiency was the use of accompanying children going with different people, to ascertain by whom marked their ballot The same report says The pressure was in favor of the PRI-PVEM in 71% of cases.
Campaign spending. The perception of spending wildly excessive and illegal campaign. Billions of pesos without exaggeration. Many citizens also have the perception that the PRI-PVEM received funding from drug money. Favoritism and manipulation of information on media. Accusations that the media, particularly television (Televisa and TV Azteca) and newspapers (many with strong economic interests) favored the PRI-PVEM campaign with spaces and commentators thus making a nomination. Handling of surveys / polls as propaganda. The polling houses remained the candidate of the PRI-PVEM with a nonexistent gap with its competitors to the end, being that the final distance (even with all the above) was 6.4%. They stood up to above 18.4%. (See image attached) Electoral violence. Attacks on those who expressed their disagreement with the candidate of the PRI-PVEM during campaigns (for the first time in the history of the country were organized marches of tens of thousands of people for the sole purpose of rejecting a candidate even before the election). Attacks on election observers and assassinations of political leaders.
6.
7.
8.
9.
For this and several other things that we are asking to annul the election. It is not just reaching another, but because we should not allow someone to become president of our country so tricky. The authority who is holding this decision is not nor has been unfair, so we appealed to national and international dissemination of these facts to press.
The newspaper El Universal, Excelsior, Milenio and El Sol de Mexico predicted a 17.1%, 16%, 18.4% and 15.2% advantage for the candidate of the PRI-PVEM respectively.
Nor mentioned any of the information that the most serious British newspaper The Guardian revealed about 26.6 million that the candidate of the PRI-PVEM broadcaster Televisa paid to position and discredit the opposition candidate.! (2nd week in June)